DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2008 Annual Report Center for Language and Cognition Groningen Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen 2 Contents Foreword 5 Part One 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Institutional Embedding 9 1.2 Profile 9 2 CLCG in 2008 10 2.1 Structure 10 2.2 Director, Advisory Board, Coordinators 10 2.3 Assessment 11 2.4 Staffing 11 2.5 Finances: Travel and Material costs 12 2.6 Internationalization 12 2.7 Contract Research 13 3 Research Activities 14 3.1 Conferences, Cooperation, and Colloquia 14 3.1.1 TABU-day 2008 14 3.1.2 Groningen conferences 14 3.1.3 Conferences elsewhere 15 3.1.4 Visiting scholars 16 3.1.5 Linguistics Colloquium 17 3.1.6 Other lectures 18 3.2 CLCG-Publications 18 3.3 PhD Training Program 18 3.3.1 Graduate students 21 3.4 Postdocs 21 Part Two 4 Research Groups 25 4.1 Computational Linguistics 25 4.2 Discourse and Communication 39 4.3. Language and Literacy Development Across the Life Span 49 4.4. Language Variation and Language Change 61 4.5. Neurolinguistics 71 4.6. Syntax and Semantics 79 Part Three 5. Research Staff 2008 93 3 4 Foreword The Center for Language and Cognition, Groningen (CLCG) continued its research into 2008, making it an exciting place to work. On behalf of CLCG I am pleased to present the 2008 annual report. Highlights of this year s activities were the following. Five PhD theses were defended: • Starting a Sentence in Dutch: A corpus study of subject- and object-fronting (Gerlof Bouma). • Open your eyes and listen carefully. Auditory and audiovisual speech perception and the McGurk effect in Dutch speakers with and without aphasia (Julia Klitsch). • Restructuring and Infinitival Complements in Dutch (Janneke ter Beek). • Off-line Answer Extraction for Question Answering (Jori Mur). • Automatic Lexico-Semantic Acquisition for Question Answering (Lonneke van der Plas). Twelve new PhD projects started: • four in computational linguistics (two externally funded): on computational modeling of lexical acquisition, on text generation from abstract dependency structures, on corpus based machine translation, and on phylogenetic investigations in language relatedness. • two in syntax and semantics (one externally funded): on word order in early child language, and on using cognitive modeling to study language acquisition. • two in discourse and communication : on language and aging, and on the role of prosody in pronoun resolution: evidence from psycholinguistics and neuroimaging. • three in language and literacy development across the life span: on explaining knowledge change through writing, on the analysis of learnability of picture books and stories for pre- school children, and on L2-acquisition of grammatical gender: role of the L1 and age of acquisition. • one in language variation and change: on regional syntax variation in Moselle- Franconian. Two NWO projects completed their last year: • on automated question answering (Gosse Bouma), • on script analysis tools for the cultural heritage (John Nerbonne). Thirteen NWO projects continued: • on asymmetries in grammar (Hendriks, VICI), • on dependency in universal grammar (Jan-Wouter Zwart), • on language, multilingualism and integration (Kees de Bot and Monika Schmid), • on modeling textual organization (Egg and Redeker), • on linguistic determinants of mutual intelligibility in Scandinavia (Charlotte Gooskens), • on grafting in syntax and on parataxis (Mark de Vries), • on the determinants of dialect differerences (John Nerbonne and Hermann Niebaum), • on the determinants of intelligibility in Flanders and in the Netherlands (John Nerbonne and Charlotte Gooskens), • on activities and interactions in preschools (Kees de Glopper), • on picture books and the social-emotional development of infants (Kees de Glopper), • on learning and interaction with diversity in the classroom (Kees de Glopper), and • on production in Turkish-Dutch aphasia (Roelien Bastiaanse), and • the developmental dyslexia project (Frans Zwarts) entered its tenth year. 5 Seven language resource projects (STEVIN) were active. Three of them ended in 2008: • D-Coi led by Gertjan van Noord on corpus annotation, • Irme led by Gertjan van Noord on lexical affinities, • COREA led by Gosse Bouma on anaphoric resolution. One continued: • LASSY led by Gertjan van Noord on syntactic annotation. Three new projects startet: • DAISY led by Gertjan van Noord on language generation and summarization, • PaCo led by Jörg Tiedemann on machine translation, • DUOMAN led by Gertjan van Noord on sentiment analysis of on-line media content. Three internationally funded projects continued: • one led by John Nerbonne aimed at measuring linguistic differences, funded by the German Volkswagen Foundation (in collaboration with Tübingen and Sofia); • one led by Angeliek van Hout and Bart Hollebrandse aimed at characterizing the structural complexity in language, funded by the European Community (in collaboration with Berlin, Postdam, Manchester and St. Andrews); • and one project entered its last year led by Roelien Bastiaanse aiming at language processing, motor sequencing and working memory in Parkinson’s Disease, funded by the International Parkinson Foundation. CLCG hosted nine visiting scholars, and organized twelve colloquia on a broad range of topics. Eight international scientific meetings were hosted in Groningen, including the traditional Groningen TABU dag, and Groningen researchers were involved in the organization of nineteen other scientific events elsewhere. CLCG completed the funded cooperation with the Ohio State University , San Diego and the University of Massachusetts, and continued cooperation with Tübingen. Prof. dr. ir. John Nerbonne CLCG director Groningen, March 2009 6 Part One 7 8 1 Introduction The Center for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG) is a research institute within the Faculty of Arts of the University of Groningen. It is home to all the linguistic research carried out within this faculty. This report summarizes the institute s activities during 2008. A substantial appendix, including a full list of publications of all CLCG members in 2008, their lectures and other professional activities, may be found on the institute s website, http://www.rug.nl/let/onderzoek/onderzoekinstituten/clcg/ (see the section on “Annual Reports”). 1.1 Institutional Embedding The institute is part of the Faculty of Arts, and all of its members are employed there. Many researchers also participate in Groningen s Center for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), a local interdisciplinary research school that brings together research from five different faculties of the University of Groningen. Many of the CLCG members likewise choose to participate in the national graduate school in Linguistics, LOT (Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalwetenschap). One of the major tasks of BCN and LOT is offering training courses to PhD students. Various PhD students attend courses that are organized by BCN and LOT, while some senior researchers teach such courses. CLCG began preparations to participate in the Graduate School for the Humanities in 2009. 1.2 Profile CLCG recognizes special responsibilities in the following four areas: • Linguistic research must work hand in hand with the instructional needs of the faculty, particularly in the modern European languages (Germanic, Romance, Slavic and Finno- Ugric). • CLCG has a special responsibility for Dutch languages and dialects, especially the minority languages spoken in the Northern Netherlands that is to say Frisian and Lower Saxon. The university recognizes this special responsibility. • Applications justify linguistic research (as well as progress in understanding). This is important for developmental linguistics, aphasiology, communications, and computational linguistics. • CLCG is in a unique position to contribute to progress through cooperation with the cognitive neurosciences in Groningen. While this opportunity is concentrated in neurolinguistics, most other CLCG groups have research with neurolinguistic implications, including language development, communication and discourse, and theoretical and computational linguistics. CLCG seeks to meet these responsibilities especially by recruiting appropriate expertise whenever vacancies arise. 9 2 CLCG in 2008 2.1 Structure The Research Staff is listed in the last chapter. In 2008 CLCG consisted of six research groups, organized by subdiscipline: • Computational Linguistics (CL) • Discourse and Communication (DC) • Language and Literacy development across the Life Span (LANSPAN) • Language Variation and Language Change (LVLC) • Neurolinguistics (NL) • Syntax and Semantics (SS) Dr. Alexandra Lenz joined the LVLC group as a Rosalind Franklin fellow. Prof. Tette Hofstra retired in May, and Dr. Markus Egg left in December to assume a chair at the Humboldt University. 2.2 Director, Advisory Board, Coordinators Prof.dr.ir. J. Nerbonne succeeded Prof.dr. G.J. de Haan as director of the Center for Language and Cognition Groningen in 1999 and was reappointed in 2007 for another 4 years. The Advisory Board of the CLCG chose Dr. C.J.W. Zwart as its chair in 2008 as the successor of Prof. dr. C.L.J. de Bot, who gave up his chair to avoid conflicting positions when he became director of BCN. The board advises the director on policy matters and consists of the full professors and the coordinators of the research groups, listed below. Prof.dr. Y.R.M. Bastiaanse Prof dr. C.L.J. de Bot Dr. M. Egg Prof.dr. C.M. de Glopper Prof.dr. G.J. de Haan Prof.dr. C.T. Hasselblatt Prof. dr. J. Hoeksema Prof.dr. T. Hofstra Prof.dr. J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graduate Student Handbook 2021-2022
    Northern Illinois University Department of English Graduate Student Handbook 2021-2022 Photo by Michael Day 1 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. ADMISSION TO THE M.A. AND PH.D. PROGRAMS 6 2.1. Applying for Admission and Admission Requirements 6 2.1.1. For Master’s Degrees – Native English-Speaking Applicants 6 2.1.2. For Master’s Degrees – Non-Native English-Speaking Applicants 7 2.1.3. For the Ph.D. – Native English-Speaking Applicants 7 2.1.4. For the Ph.D. – Non-Native English-Speaking Applicants 7 2.1.5. For Students-at-Large 7 3. MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH 9 3.1. Advising 9 3.2. Tracks 9 3.2.1. Track I (Foreign Language requirement) 9 3.2.2. Track II (No Foreign Language requirement) 10 3.3. Areas of Study 11 3.3.1. British and American Literature 11 3.3.2. English Education 12 3.3.3. Film and Literature 13 3.3.4. Linguistics 14 3.3.5. Literature and Rhetoric/Writing 15 3.3.6. Rhetoric and Writing 16 3.3.7. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) 16 3.4. Independent Reading (ENGL 698) 17 3.4.1. Proposals 17 3.4.2. Procedures 17 3.5. Comprehensive Examinations for the M.A. Degree 18 3.5.1. Examination Areas 18 3.5.2. Procedures for the Examination 19 3.5.3. Grading of the Examination 19 3.6. The M.A. Thesis 20 3.6.1. Timing of the Thesis 20 3.6.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Trees and Birds : a Festschrift for Gisbert Fanselow
    J. M. M. Brown | Andreas Schmidt | Marta Wierzba (Eds.) OF TREES AND BIRDS A Festschrift for Gisbert Fanselow Universitätsverlag Potsdam OF TREES AND BIRDS J. M. M. Brown | Andreas Schmidt | Marta Wierzba (Eds.) OF TREES AND BIRDS A Festschrift for Gisbert Fanselow Universitätsverlag Potsdam Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de/ abrufbar. Universitätsverlag Potsdam 2019 http://verlag.ub.uni-potsdam.de/ Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam Tel.: +49 (0)331 977 2533 / Fax: 2292 E-Mail: [email protected] Soweit nicht anders gekennzeichnet ist dieses Werk unter einem Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag lizenziert: Namensnennung 4.0 International Um die Bedingungen der Lizenz einzusehen, folgen Sie bitte dem Hyperlink: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Umschlaggestaltung: Sarah Pertermann Druck: docupoint GmbH Magdeburg ISBN 978-3-86956-457-9 Zugleich online veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der Universität Potsdam: https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42654 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426542 Contents Preface ................................. xiii J.M. M. Brown, Andreas Schmidt, Marta Wierzba I Morphological branch 1 The instrumental -er suffix ..................... 3 Susan Olsen Bienenfresserortungsversuch: compounding with clause-embedding heads .................... 15 Barbara Stiebels Leben mit Paradoxien ........................ 27 Manfred Bierwisch Zur Analysierbarkeit adverbieller Konnektive ......... 37 Ilse Zimmermann Measuring lexical semantic variation using word embeddings ........................ 61 Damir Cavar II Syntactic branch 75 Intermediate reflexes of movement: A problem for TAG? .. 77 Doreen Georgi Towards a Fanselownian analysis of degree expressions ... 95 Julia Bacskai-Atkari v A form-function mismatch? The case of Greek deponents .
    [Show full text]
  • Hunsrik-Xraywe.!A!New!Way!In!Lexicography!Of!The!German! Language!Island!In!Southern!Brazil!
    Dialectologia.!Special-issue,-IV-(2013),!147+180.!! ISSN:!2013+2247! Received!4!June!2013.! Accepted!30!August!2013.! ! ! ! ! HUNSRIK-XRAYWE.!A!NEW!WAY!IN!LEXICOGRAPHY!OF!THE!GERMAN! LANGUAGE!ISLAND!IN!SOUTHERN!BRAZIL! Mateusz$MASELKO$ Austrian$Academy$of$Sciences,$Institute$of$Corpus$Linguistics$and$Text$Technology$ (ICLTT),$Research$Group$DINAMLEX$(Vienna,$Austria)$ [email protected]$ $ $ Abstract$$ Written$approaches$for$orally$traded$dialects$can$always$be$seen$controversial.$One$could$say$ that$there$are$as$many$forms$of$writing$a$dialect$as$there$are$speakers$of$that$dialect.$This$is$not$only$ true$ for$ the$ different$ dialectal$ varieties$ of$ German$ that$ exist$ in$ Europe,$ but$ also$ in$ dialect$ language$ islands$ on$ other$ continents$ such$ as$ the$ Riograndese$ Hunsrik$ in$ Brazil.$ For$ the$ standardization$ of$ a$ language$ variety$ there$ must$ be$ some$ determined,$ general$ norms$ regarding$ orthography$ and$ graphemics.!Equipe!Hunsrik$works$on$the$standardization,$expansion,$and$dissemination$of$the$German$ dialect$ variety$ spoken$ in$ Rio$ Grande$ do$ Sul$ (South$ Brazil).$ The$ main$ concerns$ of$ the$ project$ are$ the$ insertion$of$Riograndese$Hunsrik$as$official$community$language$of$Rio$Grande$do$Sul$that$is$also$taught$ at$school.$Therefore,$the$project$team$from$Santa$Maria$do$Herval$developed$a$writing$approach$that$is$ based$on$the$Portuguese$grapheme$inventory.$It$is$used$in$the$picture$dictionary! Meine!ëyerste!100! Hunsrik! wërter$ (2010).$ This$ article$ discusses$ the$ picture$ dictionary$
    [Show full text]
  • Adverbial Reinforcement of Demonstratives in Dialectal German
    Glossa a journal of general linguistics Adverbial reinforcement of COLLECTION: NEW PERSPECTIVES demonstratives in dialectal ON THE NP/DP DEBATE German RESEARCH PHILIPP RAUTH AUGUSTIN SPEYER *Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Philipp Rauth In the German dialects of Rhine and Moselle Franconian, demonstratives are Universität des Saarlandes, reinforced by locative adverbs do/lo ‘here/there’ in order to emphasize their deictic Germany strength. Interestingly, these adverbs can also appear in the intermediate position, i.e., [email protected] between the demonstrative and the noun (e.g. das do Bier ‘that there beer’), which is not possible in most other varieties of European German. Our questionnaire study and several written and oral sources suggest that reinforcement has become mandatory in KEYWORDS: demonstrative contexts. We analyze this grammaticalization process as reanalysis of demonstrative; reinforcer; do/lo from a lexical head to the head of a functional Index Phrase. We also show that a German; Rhine Franconian; functional DP-shell can better cope with this kind of syntactic change and with certain Moselle Franconian; Germanic; serialization facts concerning adjoined adjectives. Romance; dialectal German; grammaticalization; reanalysis; NP; DP; questionnaire TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rauth, Philipp and Augustin Speyer. 2021. Adverbial reinforcement of demonstratives in dialectal German. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 4. 1–24. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5334/gjgl.1166 1 INTRODUCTION Rauth and Speyer 2 Glossa: a journal of In colloquial Standard German, the only difference between definite determiners (1a) and general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1166 demonstratives is emphatic stress in demonstrative contexts (1b).
    [Show full text]
  • SOEP-IS 2018—ILANGUAGE: Variables from Innovative Language Modules
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics DIW Berlin / SOEP (Ed.) Research Report SOEP-IS 2018 - ILANGUAGE: Variables from innovative language modules SOEP Survey Papers, No. 851 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: DIW Berlin / SOEP (Ed.) (2020) : SOEP-IS 2018 - ILANGUAGE: Variables from innovative language modules, SOEP Survey Papers, No. 851, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/219075 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Am-Progressives in Swabian: Some Evidence for Noun Incorporation
    AM-PROGRESSIVES IN SWABIAN: SOME EVIDENCE FOR NOUN INCORPORATION Bettina Spreng University of Saskatchewan 1. Introduction This paper summarizes the initial findings of an investigation into the syntactic and semantic properties of progressive constructions in Swabian, an Alemannic dialect of German. It is spoken in the Southwest of Germany in the state of Baden Württemberg and in parts of Bavaria. The data is elicited from speakers of a variant of Swabian spoken in Upper Swabia, an area surrounding the city of Ravensburg, located north of Lake Constance. Data was elicited from three female speakers of different ages (48, 69, 75) with low mobility. There is very little in-depth work on the syntactic properties of Swabian and, to my knowledge, no work on this particular variant. The construction that is being investigated is found in various dialects and registers of German but tends to be relegated to footnotes or assumed to be restricted to dialects in the Rhineland area, especially Cologne (Duden 2005). It is thus often named the Rhenish Progressive ‘Rheinische Verlaufsform’ in some of the descriptive and theoretical literature (Thieroff 1992, Vater 1994). However, the construction may be found in various variants of German including written German (Gárgyán 2014) despite many descriptive grammars insisting that it is restricted to one or two dialect areas or to the vernacular (Fagan 2009, Duden 2005). It thus deserves a closer look. The construction I am particularly interested in is the AM- progressive that seems to share some properties with the BEIM-progressive. Some work addressing the construction has been done for individual dialects such as Colognian (Bhatt and Schmidt 1993), Standard, Ruhr, and Low German (Andersson 1989), and Hessian (Flick and Kuhmichel 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Contents German Pronunciation &Accents
    Contents German Pronunciation &Accents Geo-social Applications of the Natural Phonetics & Tonetics Method 9 1. Foreword 10 The meaning of International German 11 Why doing Phonetics? H Typography & canlPA symbols 17 2. Pronunciation & Phonetics 20 7he Phonetic Method 29 3- The phono-articulatory apparatus 33 The vocalfolds 3« Resonators (five cavities) 39 The lips 43 4- The Classification of sounds 47 5- Vowels & vocoids 52 7he vowels & diphthongs of international German 55 6. Consonants & contoids 56 Places and manners of articulation 59 7- The consonants of international German 59 Nasals 60 Stops 61 Stop-strictives (or 'affricates') 62 Constrictives (or fricatives') 63 Approximants 64 Laterals 65 8. Structures 65 Taxophonics 69 Stress 75 9- Reduced forms 87 10. Intonation «9 Tunings 90 Protunes 90 Tunes 93 German intonation 99 11. Some texts in phonotonetic transcription (3 http://d-nb.info/1053287356 6 German Pronunciation & Accents Native accents 105 12. Neutral German pronunciation 105 Vowels & Diphthongs 111 Consonants 112 Nasals 116 Stops 122 Stop-strictives (or affricates') 123 Constrictives (or 'fricatives') 126 Approximants 126 Laterals 127 Intonation 129 13- Traditional German pronunciation 133 14. Mediatic German pronunciation 143 15- North-east Germany 149 16. Austria 155 17- Switzerland 163 18. South Tyrol (or Alto Adige, Italy) Regional accents 171 19- Germany (18) 179 Far North-west (Schleswig-Holstein: Kiel) 181 North Saxony (Hamburg) 183 yffestphalia (Düsseldorf) 185 North Rhenia (Essen) 187 Eastphalia (Hannover) 18p Mecklenburg (Rostock) lpo Brandenburg (Berlin) 194 Middle Rhenia (Cologne/Köln) 198 South Rhenia (Trier) 199 Hesse (Frankfurt) 201 Palatinate (Mannheim) 202 'Thuringia (Erfurt) 204 Saxony (Dresden) 208 Franconia (Würzburg) 211 South Franconia (Karlsuhe) 213 Swabia (Stuttgart) 216 Baden (Freiburg) 218 North Bavaria (Amberg) 220 Bavaria (Munich/München) 223 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocalisations: Evidence from Germanic Gary Taylor-Raebel A
    Vocalisations: Evidence from Germanic Gary Taylor-Raebel A thesis submitted for the degree of doctor of philosophy Department of Language and Linguistics University of Essex October 2016 Abstract A vocalisation may be described as a historical linguistic change where a sound which is formerly consonantal within a language becomes pronounced as a vowel. Although vocalisations have occurred sporadically in many languages they are particularly prevalent in the history of Germanic languages and have affected sounds from all places of articulation. This study will address two main questions. The first is why vocalisations happen so regularly in Germanic languages in comparison with other language families. The second is what exactly happens in the vocalisation process. For the first question there will be a discussion of the concept of ‘drift’ where related languages undergo similar changes independently and this will therefore describe the features of the earliest Germanic languages which have been the basis for later changes. The second question will include a comprehensive presentation of vocalisations which have occurred in Germanic languages with a description of underlying features in each of the sounds which have vocalised. When considering phonological changes a degree of phonetic information must necessarily be included which may be irrelevant synchronically, but forms the basis of the change diachronically. A phonological representation of vocalisations must therefore address how best to display the phonological information whilst allowing for the inclusion of relevant diachronic phonetic information. Vocalisations involve a small articulatory change, but using a model which describes vowels and consonants with separate terminology would conceal the subtleness of change in a vocalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    What moves where under Q movement? özge Yiicel* 1. Introduction1 In the present study, I would like to scrutinize the syntactic position occupied by the Turk- ish interrogative clitic ml as it occurs in main yes/no questions, w/i-echo questions and embedded clauses. We consider Turkish yes/no questions to trigger Focus Phrases and adopt Rizzi's (1997, 2001) Split CP Hypothesis to account for the occurrence of the Q(uestion) particle ml both in matrix clauses and in embedded clauses. Accordingly, the C system to consists of different layers such as Force P(hrase), Foc(us) P(hrase), Top(ic) P(hrase), and Fin (iteness) P(hrase), the heads of Focus and Topic to be triggered when there is a topic and focus constituent in the structure. The Force head functions to type the clause declarative, interrogative, exclamative, imperative, and etc., whereas the FinP demonstrates whether the clause is finite or non-finite: (1) ... Force ...(Topic)... (Focus)... Fin IP We propose the Q particle in Turkish yes/no questions occupy a position distinct from and lower than the position of a potential declarative complementizer such as diye or ki in embedded yes/no questions. We further investigate if it is possible for the Q particle ml to function as the Force head when it occurs at the clause periphery in main yes/no ques- tions and in embedded clauses where ml types the main clause interrogative. There are certain challenges to this claim to be investigated further. Turkish is an agglutinative SOV language with a free word order.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehbein/Simsek, Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics
    TURCOLOGICA Herausgegeben von Lars Johanson Band 103 2015 Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics Edited by Deniz Zeyrek, Çiğdem Sağın Şimşek, Ufuk Ataş, and Jochen Rehbein 2015 Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. For further information about our publishing program consult our website http://www.harrassowitz-verlag.de © Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden 2015 This work, including all of its parts, is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the limits of copyright law without the permission of the publisher is forbidden and subject to penalty. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. Printed on permanent/durable paper. Printing and binding: Hubert & Co., Göttingen Printed in Germany ISSN 0177-4743 ISBN 978-3-447-10523-1 Contents Editorial note and acknowledgement................................................................. xi Preface ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consonant and Vowel Gradation in the Proto-Germanic N-Stems Guus, Kroonen
    Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems Guus, Kroonen Citation Guus, K. (2009, April 7). Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14513 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14513 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 7 april 2009 klokke 16:15 uur door GUUS JAN KROONEN geboren te Alkmaar in 1979 Promotor: Prof. dr. A.M Lubotsky Commissie: Prof. dr. F.H.H. Kortlandt Prof. dr. R. Lühr (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) Dr. H. Perridon (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Prof. dr. A. Quak Þá er þeir Borssynir gengu með sævar strǫndu, fundu þeir tré tvau ok tóku upp tréin ok skǫpuðu af menn: gaf hinn fyrsti ǫnd ok líf, annarr vit ok hræring, þriði ásjónu ok málit ok heyrn ok sjón. Hár, Gylfaginning The Leiden theory explains religion as a disease of language and predicts the existence of God and other such parasitic mental constructs as artefacts of language. George van Driem, 2003 Table of contents Preface................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Language Processing and Syntactic Differentiation: a Corpus Case Study
    ABSTRACT NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND SYNTACTIC DIFFERENTIATION: A CORPUS CASE STUDY Melissa Wright, M.A. Department of English Northern Illinois University, 2017 Gulsat Aygen and Reva Freedman, Thesis Co-Directors This study analyzed syntactic structures retrieved from Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray. Specifically, the constituents and parts of speech within two types of text in the novel – dialogue and descriptive/explanatory – were examined, with the hypotheses that, between the dialogue and the descriptive texts within the narrative, one type would display longer syntactic structures and more embedded clauses, and that specific conjunctions occur more frequently within structures with these clauses. This study utilized natural language processing (NLP) to investigate syntactic length and frequency of parts of speech in the character dialogue and descriptive passages in this narrative. The hypotheses prove to be true, and I prove that Wilde’s character dialogue provides simpler and smaller syntactic structures than the descriptive passages. The findings in this study illustrate the importance of context when studying linguistic features – within a conversation, it may be a subconscious expectation that speakers will employ simpler constructions due to working memory (WM) load; however, when reading a descriptive passage within a written work, such limitations may not apply. The results of this study can enable future researchers to investigate linguistic components specific to an individual’s written and oral speech patterns
    [Show full text]