3.0 Precontact Review
3-1 3.0 PRECONTACT REVIEW A discussion of the regional prehistory is included in cultural resource reports in order to provide a framework within which to examine the local archaeological record. Archaeological sites are not individual entities, but were once part of a dynamic cultural system. As a result, individual sites cannot be adequately examined or interpreted without reference to other sites and resources in the general area. In general, archaeologists summarize the prehistory of a given area (i.e., the archaeological region) by outlining the sequence of archaeological cultures through time. Archaeological cultures are defined largely in geographical terms, but also reflect shared environmental and cultural traits. The Wekiva Parkway/SR 46 Realignment PD&E Study area is situated within the East and Central Lake archaeological region, as defined by Milanich and Fairbanks (1980) and Milanich (1994) (Figure 3.1). The spatial boundaries of the region are somewhat arbitrary, and it is after 500 B.C. that characteristic regional differences become more evident in the archaeological record. There are differences, however, evident as early as the Middle Archaic period when the characteristic Mount Taylor horizon develops along the St. Johns River. The Paleo-Indian, Archaic, Formative, Mississippian, and Acculturative stages have been defined based on unique sets of material culture traits such as characteristic stone tool forms and ceramics, as well as subsistence, settlement, and burial patterns. These broad temporal units are further subdivided into culture horizons, phases or periods: Paleo- Indian (Clovis, Suwannee, Dalton?), Early Archaic (Bolen, Kirk), Mount Taylor, Orange, St. Johns I, St. Johns Ia, St.
[Show full text]