Arxiv:2009.07266V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 15 Sep 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version September 16, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 An Earth-like stellar wind environment for Proxima Centauri c Julian´ D. Alvarado-Gomez´ 1, ∗ and Jeremy J. Drake2, y Cecilia Garraffo,3, 2 Ofer Cohen,4 Katja Poppenhaeger,1, 5 Rakesh K. Yadav,6 and Sofia P. Moschou2 1Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany 2Center for Astrophysics j Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3Institute for Applied Computational Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 4University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Department of Physics & Applied Physics, 600 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA 5University of Potsdam, Institute for Physics and Astronomy, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA (Accepted September 16, 2020) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT A new planet has been recently discovered around Proxima Centauri. With an orbital separation of ∼ 1:44 au and a minimum mass of about 7 M⊕, Proxima c is a prime direct imaging target for atmospheric characterization. The latter can only be performed with a good understanding of the space environment of the planet, as multiple processes can have profound effects on the atmospheric structure and evolution. Here, we take one step in this direction by generating physically-realistic numerical simulations of Proxima's stellar wind, coupled to a magnetosphere and ionosphere model around Proxima c. We evaluate their expected variation due to the magnetic cycle of the host star, as well as for plausible inclination angles for the exoplanet orbit. Our results indicate stellar wind dynamic pressures comparable to present-day Earth, with a slight increase (by a factor of 2) during high activity periods of the star. A relatively weak interplanetary magnetic field at the distance of Proxima c leads to negligible stellar wind Joule heating of the upper atmosphere (about 10% of the solar wind contribution on Earth) for an Earth-like planetary magnetic field (0:3 G). Finally, we provide an assessment of the likely extreme conditions experienced by the exoplanet candidate Proxima d, tentatively located at 0:029 au with a minimum mass of 0:29 M⊕. Keywords: stars: activity | stars: individual (Proxima Centauri) | stars: late-type | stars: winds, outflows 1. INTRODUCTION times closer than in the case of our own solar system The space weather in M dwarf planetary systems (e.g. Kopparapu et al. 2013, 2014 Shields et al. 2016). presents a particularly challenging case for exoplanet Specifically, the habitable zone semi-major axis (a) 2 atmospheres. The diminutive bolometric luminosity follows a / Lbol (Kopparapu et al. 2013). On the arXiv:2009.07266v1 [astro-ph.SR] 15 Sep 2020 other hand, stellar wind mass loss rates are thought to (Lbol) of M dwarfs means their temperature-based hab- itable zones, within which liquid water can be sustained, scale with X-ray luminosity with a power greater than one (i.e., M_ / L1:34, Wood et al. 2005). In this way, lie close to the central star|as much as ten or more F X the wind through a unit surface area at the main se- _ 2 quence habitable zone distance scales like MF=a / 1:34 1:34 3:5 Corresponding author: J. D. Alvarado-G´omez& J. J. Drake L =Lbol / L =M . Therefore, the stellar wind in- X X F (These authors contributed equally to this work). tensity within the habitable zone increases with decreas- [email protected], [email protected] ing stellar mass. Moreover, M dwarfs remain magneti- ∗ 7 @AstroRaikoh j Karl Schwarzschild Fellow cally very active (i.e., high LX=Lbol values) over much y 7 @cosmodrake longer timescales than higher mass stars (e.g. Wright 2 Alvarado-Gomez´ & Drake et al. et al. 2011, Davenport et al. 2019), so that the integrated (S´egransanet al. 2003, Kiraga & Stepien 2007, Anglada- exposure to the most intense stellar winds is commen- Escud´eet al. 2016). surately greater. Proxima hosts our nearest exoplanetary system and A number of studies employing detailed and realis- presents a unique opportunity for exoplanet characteri- tic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of stellar zation. The first planet discovered in the system, Prox- winds have examined the effects of space weather on ima b, is estimated to be of at least 1:17 Earth masses exoplanets, including those in M dwarf systems (e.g. Vi- (Su´arezMascare~noet al. 2020) and has an orbital period dotto et al. 2014, Cohen et al. 2014, Alvarado-G´omez of 11:2 days, with a semi-major axis of only 0:049 au et al. 2019b). For habitable zone planets around M (Anglada-Escud´eet al. 2016). This orbit is approxi- dwarfs, models predict stellar wind dynamic pressures mately twenty times closer to Proxima than the Earth up to four orders of magnitude greater than experienced is to the Sun. Proxima b does not transit Proxima Cen- by the present-day Earth, together with orders of magni- tauri from the vantage point of the solar system (Jenkins tude pressure variations on sub-orbital timescales of one et al. 2019) and its orbital inclination, and consequently to a few days (Vidotto et al. 2014, Garraffo et al. 2016, its mass, are presently unknown. 2017), intense Joule heating (Cohen et al. 2014, 2018), Proxima b is in Proxima's classically-defined \habit- severe atmospheric loss (Dong et al. 2017, Garcia-Sage able zone", having an equilibrium temperature of 234 K et al. 2017), and transitions into and out of sub-Alfv´enic (Anglada-Escud´eet al. 2016), which is slightly cooler wind conditions on orbital timescales (Cohen et al. 2014, than that of Earth (255 K). Several studies have ex- Garraffo et al. 2017). amined its likely irradiation history and possible cli- Here, we study the steady stellar wind environment of mate and evolution in relation to potential habitability the new-found planetary companion around our near- (e.g. Ribas et al. 2016, Turbet et al. 2016). est star (Proxima c, Damasso et al. 2020). The discov- Analysis of radial velocity variations by Damasso et al. ery of a planetary system around Proxima (Anglada- (2020) suggested the presence of a secondary ∼ 6−7 M⊕ Escud´eet al. 2016) represented a watershed moment in planet in a ∼ 5 yr orbit around Proxima. Follow-up exoplanetary research|a stark confirmation that plan- studies have placed limits on the properties of Prox- etary systems are very common in the universe with ima c, measuring anomalies in Proxima's astromet- the tantalizing prospect of potentially being reachable ric proper motion (Kervella et al. 2020, Benedict & by an interstellar probe (e.g. Heller et al. 2017, Parkin McArthur 2020a), as well as direct imaging from ground- 2018). We construct three-dimensional MHD models of based observations (Gratton et al. 2020). Combining all the magnetized stellar wind of Proxima using a state- the available constraints, Benedict & McArthur (2020b) of-the-art computational framework and a surface mag- obtained the most up-to-date set of orbital parameters, netic field map derived from sophisticated dynamo simu- placing it in a circular orbit (e ' 0) at approximately lations tuned to the case of Proxima (Yadav et al. 2016). 1:44 au (∼ 5:3 yr orbital period). We use the models to investigate the conditions expe- A recent study reports a small radial velocity pertur- rienced by Proxima c, which is estimated to have a mass bation of Proxima which, assuming a planetary origin, of about seven times that of Earth, orbiting at a dis- would indicate an additional low-mass object (M sin i ' tance comparable to Mars in the solar system (Damasso 0:29 M⊕) at a distance of ∼ 0:029 au (Su´arezMascare~no et al. 2020). We evaluate how the stellar wind proper- et al. 2020). If confirmed, it would become the inner- ties change with the magnetic activity level of the host most known planet of the system, orbiting closer than star, and compare our results to those of previous stud- Proxima b and just short of the optimistic habitable ies on other exoplanet systems. Finally, we touch upon zone (∼ 0:03 − 0:09 au, Kane & Gelino 2012). the case of Proxima d, a tentative additional planetary Harsh circumstellar conditions are expected in the sys- candidate of the Proxima system that would be the clos- tem. Proxima itself is a flare star and displays optical, est known planet to the star, lying within the orbit of UV and X-ray variability that is consistent with a stellar Proxima b (Su´arezMascare~noet al. 2020). activity cycle with a period of about 7 years (Wargelin et al. 2017). The amplitude of the cycle in the stellar X-ray luminosity is of the order of ±50% in an energy 2. THE PROXIMA CENTAURI SYSTEM band of 1.2-2.4 keV, and somewhat lower in softer X- rays at energies 0.2-1.2 keV at approximately ±20%. Proxima Centauri, also just known as Proxima, is an This means that apart from flares, which occur often M5.5 dwarf with an effective temperature of 3042 K, on Proxima (e.g. Fuhrmeister et al. 2011, Vida et al. a mass of 0:122 M , a radius of 0:154 R , a rotation period of 83 days, and an estimated age of 4:85 Gyr An Earth-like stellar environment for Proxima Centauri c 3 2019), the quiescent X-ray environment of the planets minimum (450 G) and maximum (750 G) to match the also changes over time. limits from Zeeman broadening observations of Proxima Unlike the coronal properties, only limits are available (hBiS = 600 ± 150 G; Reiners & Basri 2008).