DOCSLIB.ORG

Papers from the 2014 Fields of Conflict Conference and Preservation Workshop Steven D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 2016 Preserving Fields of Conflict: Papers from the 2014 Fields of Conflict Conference and Preservation Workshop Steven D. Smith University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/anth_facpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in 2016. Smith, Steven D., ed. Preserving Fields of Conflict: Papers from the 2014 Fields of Conflict Conference and Preservation Workshop. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina--South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2016. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2016 by University of South Carolina--South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRESERVING FIELDS OF CONFLICT: PAPERS FROM THE 2014 FIELDS OF CONFLICT CONFERENCE AND PRESERVATION WORKSHOP STEVEN D. SMITH, EDITOR South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina 1321 Pendleton St. Columbia, SC 29208 PRESERVING FIELDS OF CONFLICT: PAPERS FROM THE 2014 FIELDS OF CONFLICT CONFERENCE AND PRESERVATION WORKSHOP STEVEN D. SMITH, EDITOR South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology Columbia, South Carolina 1321 Pendleton St. Columbia, SC 29208 Funded by: Grant GA2287-13-023 American Battlefield Protection Program Heritage Preservation Services Division National Park Service Washington, DC Southeast Archeological Center, National Park Service Tallahassee, Florida Department of Anthropology University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 2016 This material is based upon work assisted by a grant from the Department of Interior, National Park Service, American Battlefield Protection Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Interior. Photo Credits: Unless otherwise noted, all photos and images are owned by the respective authors. ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY From 12 through 15 March 2014 conflict archeologists and preservationists met in Columbia, South Carolina, to present 54 papers and 14 posters at the 8th Biennial Fields of Conflict Conference. In conjunction with the conference, a workshop was held on the preservation of battlefields across the globe entitled “Call to Action: National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Battlefield Preservation Workshop.” The 33 papers in this volume are extended abstracts of those papers presented in a popular format. The goal of this volume is to make conflict archeology assessable to the public and raise the awareness of the critical importance of battlefield preservation. iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................. Kristen McMasters ................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. xi Introduction to the Volume Steven D. Smith ...................................................................................................................................... 1 From Metal Detecting to a New Museum at Monmouth Battlefield Park: The Story of BRAVO Daniel Silivich ................................................................................................................................... 7 Better Training = Better Battlefield Interpretation: The AMDA and APP Classes Christopher T. Espenshade and Patrick Severts .....................................................................................11 Conservation Through Recognition: Material Culture Research as a Heritage Management Tool for Conflict Sites Natasha Ferguson ..................................................................................................................................17 The Extensive Battlefield of Kalkriese (Varus Battle 9 AD): A Challenge for Archeological Research and Monument Preservation Achim Rost and Susanne Wilbers-Rost ..................................................................................................25 Preserving the Dacian Landscape: Documenting Roman and Dacian Military Fortifications in Romania .............. Jeremy C. Miller ...................................................................................................................................31 Landscape of Conflict in 12th-Century Gwynedd ................................................................................................. Jacqueline Veninger ...............................................................................................................................39 Guns on the Battlefields of Late Medieval Europe: Archeological Evidence for the Origins of Firepower Glenn Foard ...................................................................................................................................47 The Slingstones and Arrows of Unfortunate Outrage: Vazquez De Coronado in the Rio Grande Valley, 1540-1542 Matthew F. Schmader............................................................................................................................51 Rough People in a Rough Situation: Mixton War (1541-1542) and Caxcanes ....................................................... Angélica María Medrano Enríquez .........................................................................................................59 Contemporary Military Concepts as Interpretive Frameworks for Understanding the Conduct of Historical Warfare Nathan H. Ledbetter ..............................................................................................................................65 v Battlefield Protection in Germany and the Lützen Project André Schürger ...................................................................................................................................69 Historical and Archeological Investigations of 1812-1813 Cantonment Saranac, Plattsburgh, New York Timothy Abel ...................................................................................................................................75 Archeology and the Second Battle of Sackets Harbor: Why the Militia Deserves its Due ..................................... Matthew Kirk and Corey D. McQuinn ....................................................................................................79 “I Tremble for the Fate of the Greenbrier People”: Border Conflict in Revolutionary Era West Virginia W. Stephen McBride and Kim A. McBride ..............................................................................................85 Modeling Small Arms Projectile Distribution on 18th and 19th Century Battlefields Garrett W. Silliman and Brandon Batt ...................................................................................................91 A Mnemonic Artifact: A 1777 Cheval De Frise from the Delaware River Battlefield Nicole Wittig and Lawrence Babits ..................................................................................................... 101 Stirring the Hornet’s Nest: Recent Conflict Archeology in Wilkes County, Georgia Daniel T. Elliott ................................................................................................................................ 107 Locating the Lost American Revolutionary Battle of Brier Creek, Georgia Daniel Battle ................................................................................................................................ 113 Revolutionary Savannah or Just Another Ghost Tour? ......................................................................................... Rita Folse Elliott ................................................................................................................................ 119 The Search for Williamson’s Plantation Battlefield Michael C. Scoggins and Steven D. Smith ............................................................................................ 125 A Closer Look at the Battle of Palo Alto: Historic Background Rolando L. Garza ................................................................................................................................ 129 The Archeology of the 1846 Mexican American War Battle of Palo Alto .............................................................. John E. Cornelison, Jr., Rolando L. Garza, Guy L. Prentice, and Michael A. Seibert .............................. 135 Determining Battle Lines: A pXRF Study of the Lead Shot from the Battle of Palo Alto Michael Seibert, John Cornelison, Rolando Garza, Sarah Kovalaskas, and Bruce Kaiser ...................... 143 Skeletal Analysis of Mexican Soldiers from the Battle of Resaca De La Palma Daniel J. Wescott ...............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Battle of the Shallow Ford

    Battle of the Shallow Ford

    Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem North Carolina State Society Sons of the American Revolution The Bethabara Bugler Volume 1, Issue 22 November 1, 2020 Chartered 29 October 1994 Re-Organized 08 November 2014. The Bethabara Bugler is the Newsletter of the Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem. It is, under normal circumstances, published monthly (except during the months of June, July, and August when there will only be one summer edition). It will be distributed by email, usually at the first of the month. Articles, suggestions, and ideas are welcome – please send them to: Allen Mollere, 3721 Stancliff Road, Clemmons, NC 27012, or email: [email protected]. ----------------------------------------- Bethabara Chapter Meetings As you are aware, no Bethabara Chapter SAR on-site meetings have been held recently due to continuing concerns over the Corona virus. On September 10, 2020, the Bethabara Chapter did conduct a membership meeting via Zoom. ----------------------------------------- Page 1 of 19 Commemoration of Battle of the Shallow Ford Forty-seven individuals wearing protective masks due to the Covid-19 pandemic, braved the inclement weather on Saturday, October 10, 2020 to take part in a modified 240th Commemoration Ceremony of the Battle of the Shallow Ford at historic Huntsville UM Church. Hosted by the Winston-Salem Bethabara Chapter of the Sons of The American Revolution (SAR), attendees included visitors, Compatriots from the Alamance Battleground, Bethabara, Nathanael Greene, Catawba Valley, and Yadkin Valley SAR Chapters as well as Daughters of The American Revolution (DAR) attendees from the Battle of Shallow Ford, Jonathan Hunt, Leonard's Creek, Colonel Joseph Winston, and Old North State Chapters.
  • First Evidence of Farming Appears; Stone Axes, Antler Combs, Pottery in Common Use

    First Evidence of Farming Appears; Stone Axes, Antler Combs, Pottery in Common Use

    BC c.5000 - Neolithic (new stone age) Period begins; first evidence of farming appears; stone axes, antler combs, pottery in common use. c.4000 - Construction of the "Sweet Track" (named for its discoverer, Ray Sweet) begun; many similar raised, wooden walkways were constructed at this time providing a way to traverse the low, boggy, swampy areas in the Somerset Levels, near Glastonbury; earliest-known camps or communities appear (ie. Hembury, Devon). c.3500-3000 - First appearance of long barrows and chambered tombs; at Hambledon Hill (Dorset), the primitive burial rite known as "corpse exposure" was practiced, wherein bodies were left in the open air to decompose or be consumed by animals and birds. c.3000-2500 - Castlerigg Stone Circle (Cumbria), one of Britain's earliest and most beautiful, begun; Pentre Ifan (Dyfed), a classic example of a chambered tomb, constructed; Bryn Celli Ddu (Anglesey), known as the "mound in the dark grove," begun, one of the finest examples of a "passage grave." c.2500 - Bronze Age begins; multi-chambered tombs in use (ie. West Kennet Long Barrow) first appearance of henge "monuments;" construction begun on Silbury Hill, Europe's largest prehistoric, man-made hill (132 ft); "Beaker Folk," identified by the pottery beakers (along with other objects) found in their single burial sites. c.2500-1500 - Most stone circles in British Isles erected during this period; pupose of the circles is uncertain, although most experts speculate that they had either astronomical or ritual uses. c.2300 - Construction begun on Britain's largest stone circle at Avebury. c.2000 - Metal objects are widely manufactured in England about this time, first from copper, then with arsenic and tin added; woven cloth appears in Britain, evidenced by findings of pins and cloth fasteners in graves; construction begun on Stonehenge's inner ring of bluestones.
  • East-West Film Journal, Volume 3, No. 2

    East-West Film Journal, Volume 3, No. 2

    EAST-WEST FILM JOURNAL VOLUME 3 . NUMBER 2 Kurosawa's Ran: Reception and Interpretation I ANN THOMPSON Kagemusha and the Chushingura Motif JOSEPH S. CHANG Inspiring Images: The Influence of the Japanese Cinema on the Writings of Kazuo Ishiguro 39 GREGORY MASON Video Mom: Reflections on a Cultural Obsession 53 MARGARET MORSE Questions of Female Subjectivity, Patriarchy, and Family: Perceptions of Three Indian Women Film Directors 74 WIMAL DISSANAYAKE One Single Blend: A Conversation with Satyajit Ray SURANJAN GANGULY Hollywood and the Rise of Suburbia WILLIAM ROTHMAN JUNE 1989 The East- West Center is a public, nonprofit educational institution with an international board of governors. Some 2,000 research fellows, grad­ uate students, and professionals in business and government each year work with the Center's international staff in cooperative study, training, and research. They examine major issues related to population, resources and development, the environment, culture, and communication in Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center was established in 1960 by the United States Congress, which provides principal funding. Support also comes from more than twenty Asian and Pacific governments, as well as private agencies and corporations. Kurosawa's Ran: Reception and Interpretation ANN THOMPSON AKIRA KUROSAWA'S Ran (literally, war, riot, or chaos) was chosen as the first film to be shown at the First Tokyo International Film Festival in June 1985, and it opened commercially in Japan to record-breaking busi­ ness the next day. The director did not attend the festivities associated with the premiere, however, and the reception given to the film by Japa­ nese critics and reporters, though positive, was described by a French critic who had been deeply involved in the project as having "something of the air of an official embalming" (Raison 1985, 9).
  • Summary of Proposed National Register/Georgia Register Nomination

    Summary of Proposed National Register/Georgia Register Nomination

    SUMMARY OF PROPOSED NATIONAL REGISTER/GEORGIA REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Name: Brier Creek Battlefield 2. Location: Approximately one mile south of Old River Road along Brannen Bridge Road, Sylvania vicinity, Screven County, Georgia 3a. Description: Brier Creek Battlefield is located largely within the state of Georgia’s Tuckahoe Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Screven County. The battlefield is delineated in the Georgia Archaeological Site Files as archaeological Site 9SN254. The National Register historic district boundary comprises 2,686 acres of this site: 2,521.3 acres are owned by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources as part of the Tuckahoe WMA, while 164.7 acres are privately owned by Warsaw Pines and Timberland LLC, in a silviculture area known locally as Chisolm Farm. These two tracts contain thirteen contributing resources and one noncontributing resource, all of which are archaeological sites, clustered in the western half of the district. The battlefield is located on a natural peninsula formed by the confluence of Brier Creek and the Savannah River. The topography is relatively low and flat, and vegetation consists of mature stands of planted loblolly pine trees actively managed for silviculture. Anhydric soils in the peninsula are surrounded by wet, swampy cypress forests which border Brier Creek and the Savannah River. A dirt road loops the peninsula, running southeast from Brannen Bridge Road. The property’s integrity of location and association are evidenced by historic documentation along with the recovery of military artifacts during archaeological studies, while the open pine forest, bordering cypress swamps, and the battlefield’s overall rural character effectively portray integrity of setting and feeling.
  • How Strong Was Strong Mountain? Preliminary Remarks on the Possible Location of the Mamluk Siege Position at Montfort Castle

    How Strong Was Strong Mountain? Preliminary Remarks on the Possible Location of the Mamluk Siege Position at Montfort Castle

    CHAPTER 26 How Strong was Strong Mountain? Preliminary Remarks on the Possible Location of the Mamluk Siege Position at Montfort Castle Rafael Lewis During a topographic and landscape archaeology sur- logical site to the broader landscape, including every vey, thoughts on Montfort Castle’s topographical infe- archaeological feature in it. The field methods used riority led to some preliminary1 ideas on the manner in Landscape Archaeology and the Archaeology of in which the Teutonic Order dealt with this crucial Conflicts includes the equal examination of all man- weakness, and what would have been the best loca- made features, not excluding modern elements which tion for the Mamluks to position their siege machinery are documented and studied. The underlying concept and camps during the two assaults of the castle in May of this approach is that in order to understand the 1266 and June 1271.2 meaning of a single find or feature, we need to under- Montfort Castle is isolated from main roads, com- stand the environment in which they were found and mercial centres and major settlements. The problem how they relate to it. The manner in which objects of its isolated location has been raised in the past.3 In are scattered in the landscape is examined strati- order to better understand the castle in its setting, I graphically, but also according to their focal, discrete or decided to go beyond the well-secured boundaries of expanded nature. A path, for example, can usually be the castle’s walls, to raise my head (methodologically) described as a discrete or expanded feature, but a road from the trenches, bulks and archaeological artefacts, junction where a few such features meet, is usually of and look at this specific topic of inquiry from a wide a focal nature.
  • Commagenorum

    Commagenorum

    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
  • Baine's [!] History of the Late

    Baine's [!] History of the Late

    y'^^^^ > .3 ^.. v-^^ .o< ^ r^: c"^ 00 ,*^ v: 0" ^ * ^t. v^^ :^, A^ iv '=t ^^ 00^ oH vO V,-^ •^.-^77;^^G^ Oo. A -f. ?: -%.%^ °-'>^i^'.' ^>- 'If, . -vV 1 "'r-t/t/'*^ "i" v^ .''^ «^r "^ - /^ ^ *<, s^ ^0 ^ ^ s}> -r;^. ^^. .- .>r-^. ^ '^ '^. ,^^«iy' c « O. ..s^J^ i^ » ,,$^ 'V. aN^' -. ^ ^ s , o * O , ^ y 0" .. °^ :f' .1 / BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND GREAT BRITAIN; WITH A CTJllTlCAli ATTEXmX, &c BY EBENEZER HARLOW CUMMINS, A. M. BALTIMOBE: riinted by Benja. Edes, corner of Second and Ga/.streets 1820. ADVERTISEMENT. Since the late hostilities with Great Britain, several books have been published in the United States purporting to be histories of tiie war. No one of tliem, it is believed, can be received as generally authentic: the whole adding little to the literary char- acter of the country. Of those most g-en'^rally circulated, we can speak the least favourably, as specimens of history, which means something more than compilations from newspapers, or a tirade of epithets stigmatising our adversaries. Two or three stipendi- aries occupied the fore ground in the race of the booksellers for the market of the United States, producing interesting though coarse compilations; which, while the feelings created by the war were still in Hvely existence, were read with sensations of pleas- ure. But no one now will ascribe to their works, the name, much less the character of history. Weems' life of Marion, in which the author has collated and embellished many interesting events, with the view to a popular book, has greatly superiour pretensions to either. With enough of fact to challenge, at this late day, the credence of most readers, it excels in all kinds of jest and fancy; and administers abundantly of the finest entertain- ment to the lovers of fun.
  • North Carolina Archaeology

    North Carolina Archaeology

    North Carolina Archaeology Volume 65 2016 North Carolina Archaeology Volume 65 October 2016 CONTENTS Don’t Let Ethics Get in the Way of Doing What’s Right: Three Decades of Working with Collectors in North Carolina I. Randolph Daniel, Jr. ......................................................................................... 1 Mariners’ Maladies: Examining Medical Equipage from the Queen Anne’s Revenge Shipwreck Linda F. Carnes-McNaughton ........................................................................... 28 Archival Excavations from Dusty File Cabinets, Part I: Unpublished Artifact Pattern Data of Colonial Period Households, Dependency Buildings, and Public Structures from Colonial Brunswick Town Thomas E. Beaman, Jr. ...................................................................................... 53 Preface: Identifying and Defining North Carolina’s Archaeological Heritage through Remote Sensing and Geophysics John J. Mintz and Shawn M. Patch .................................................................... 90 The Role of GPR in Archaeology: A Beginning Not an End Charles R. Ewen ................................................................................................. 92 Three-dimensional Remote Sensing at House in the Horseshoe State Historic Site (31MR20), Moore County, North Carolina Stacy Curry and Doug Gallaway ..................................................................... 100 An Overview of Geophysical Surveys and Ground-truthing Excavations at House in the Horseshoe (31MR20), Moore County, North
  • Henry D. Tiioreau

    Henry D. Tiioreau

    84 HENRY D. TIIOREAU ago you could see the top of a pitchpine, of the kind called yellow pine hereabouts, though it is not a distinct species, projecting above the surface in deep water, many rods from the shore.It was even supposed by some that the pond had sunk, and this was one of the primitive forest that formerly stood there.I find that even so long ago as 179Q, in a "Topographical Descrip- tion of the Town of Concord," by one of its citizens, in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical So- ciety, the author, after speaking of Walden and White Ponds, adds, "In the middle of the latter may be seen, when the water is very low, a tree which appears as if it grew in the place where it now stands, although the roots are fifty feet below the surface of the water; the top of this tree is broken off, and at that place measures four- teen inches in diameter." In the spring of '4I talked with the man who lives nearest the pond in Sudbury, who told me that it was he who got out this tree ten or fifteen years before. As near as he could remember, it stood twelve or fifteen rods from the shore, where the water was thirty or forty feet deep. It was in the winter, and he had been getting out ice in the forenoon, and bad resolved that in the afternoon, with the aid of his neigh- bors, he would take out the old yellow pine. He sawed a channel in the ice to'ard the shore, and hauled it over and along and out on to the ice withoxen; but, before lie had gone far in his work, he was surprised to find that it was wrong end upward, with the stumps of the branches pointing down, and the small end firmly fastened in the sandy bottom.It was about a foot in diameter at the big end, and he had expected to geta good saw-log, but THE PONDS 85 it was so rotten as to be fit only for fuel, if for that.
  • Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE VOL

    Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE VOL

    Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE VOL. 24, NO. 2, DECEMBER 2020 Battlefield Archaeology Book––Francis Marion and the Snow’s Island Community RESEARCH Small Arms Evidence from Star Fort Numismatic History of Charlesfort/Santa Elena: Plantation Era New Mound at Mulberry Archaeology in South Carolina Book MARITIME RESEARCH MRD Features in National Geographic TV Channel Drain the Oceans Season 3 A Mystery Object from Mississippi SAVANNAH RIVER By Chester B. DePratter, Director of Research ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH In 1976, I first became interested in colleagues, Charles Hudson and Marvin PROGRAM Hernando de Soto and the expedition he Smith, and I have published papers on Public Outreach in Time of Covid led through the Southeast when I was the 1539-1543 route that Soto and his men SCIAA ANNUAL REPORT just beginning work on my Ph.D. at the took from their landing in Tampa Bay, A New Feature in Legacy University of Georgia. In the 44 years that Florida, to the departure of the expedition have passed since then, my friends and survivors down the Mississippi River HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY A New Feature in Legacy MYSTERY ARTIFACT, See Page 4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH TRUST (ART) AND SCIAA DONORS ENDOWMENT OPPORTUNITIES Stanley South Student Archaeological Research Endowment Fund Thank you for your generous support of the Archaeological Research Trust (ART) Endowment Fund and the printing of Legacy. Please send donations in the enclosed envelope to Nena Powell Rice USC/SCIAA, 1321 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, indicating whether you want to continue receiving Legacy and include your email address. All contributions are appreciated. Please visit our website at: http://www.
  • Jamaica Plain Gazette • MAY 28, 2021

    Jamaica Plain Gazette • MAY 28, 2021

    Ellen + Janis Building Community Together #1 Team in Jamaica Plain and Roslindale in 2020* Real Estate Team 617.256.8455 ellenandjanis.com * Source: MLS-PIN EGLESTON SQUARE LIBRARY REDESIGN, PAGE 10 Vol. 30 No. 8 28 Pages • Free Delivery Our offices will be 25 Cents at Stores closed Monday, May Jamaica Plain 31 in observance of Memorial Day Advertising deadline Printed on is Friday @ 4pm Recycled Paper AZETTE 617-524-2626 G MAY 28, 2021 WWW.JAMAICAPLAINGAZETTE.COM ESAC awarded Complaints filed against $100,000 Cummings grant project on Washington St. BY LAUREN BENNETT project. STAF REPORT The brewery was not party to Monty Gold, the owner of the the lawsuit against the project at Ecumenical Social Action building at 3377 Washington St., 3368 Washington St. Committee is one of 140 local home to Turtle Swamp Brewing, The project at 3371 Washing- nonprofits to receive grants has filed another suit against the ton St., proposed by the Jamai- through Cummings Foundation›s Zoning Board of Appeal (ZBA) ca Plain Neighborhood Devel- $25 Million Grant program. decision to approve the afford- opment Corporation (JPNDC), The Boston-based organization able senior housing project at along with New Atlantic Devel- was chosen from a total of 590 3371-3375 Washington St. This opment, is to build a five story, applicants during a competitive lawsuit comes a little over a week 38 unit affordable senior hous- review process. It will receive after settling a suit regarding ing development on the site, as $100,000 over 4 years. the affordable housing project at well as create a new commercial Since 1965, Ecumenical Ecumenical Social Action Committee Executive Director, Dr.
  • Nadia CV 09:17:19

    Nadia CV 09:17:19

    Nadia C. Neff, PhD Student Department of Anthropology [email protected] University of New Mexico (970) 488 – 9932 Anthropology Annex B06E Albuquerque, New Mexico EDUCATION AND TRAINING University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM PhD Student 2019 – present Department of Anthropology Archaeology Subfield Fort Lewis College Durango, CO Visiting Instructor of Anthropology 2017 – 2019 Department of Anthropology University of York York, United Kingdom Master of Science, Bioarchaeology 2014 – 2016 Department of Archaeology Graduated with Merit Fort Lewis College Durango, CO Bachelor of Art, Anthropology 2009 – 2013 Department of Anthropology Graduated with Honors RESEARCH EXPERIENCE PhD Student 2019 - present University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Advisors: Dr. Osbjorn Pearson, Dr Keith Prufer Rodents! Using stable isotopes to model dietary and environmental change from the Paleoindian period to the Mayan Collapse in modern Belize. – Currently studying the utility of using stable isotopes in rodent remains as a proxy for studying human dietary and environmental activity. Masters Student 2014 – 2016 University of York, York, United Kingdom Advisor: Dr. Matthew Collins Identifying potential sites of conflict through the analysis of possible human bone fragments via ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry). – Studied the applications of using ZooMS for the identification of human bone fragments in archaeological and forensic contexts. Nadia C. Neff | [email protected] | (970) 488 – 9932 1 – Combined traditional field survey and documentation methods with biomolecular protein analysis to create human bone scatter maps to identify possible sites of conflict. – Research based on a case study involving the Battle of Towton (1461) site. Collagen extraction method testing in highly degraded bone fragments – Tested collagen extraction methods (HCl demineralization versus AmBiC surface washing) on highly degraded bone fragments found in surface and top soil finds.