Dancing Backwards in High Heels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Political Risk Alert (30 Oct. 2019)
Political Risk Alert (30 Oct. 2019) Argentina: Election outcome means early start on debt challenge Event: Alberto Fernandez achieved a comfortable first-round victory over incumbent President Mauricio Macri on October 27. Significance: Avoiding the need for a second round should help to speed up efforts to tackle the economic crisis and bring forward the start of debt renegotiations with creditors. Fernandez’s economic transition team is closer to him than to his vice-president-elect, former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner (CFK). However, the extent to which the populist-leaning CFK will dominate the new administration is a major concern for investors, as is the outlook for talks with the IMF. Meanwhile, the political alliance that backed Macri’s pro-business stance looks close to disintegrating. Analysis: Fernandez won a clear margin of 48% to 40%, although this was smaller than suggested by recent polling. However, the fact that Macri improved his performance by some 8 percentage points is due to the votes he won from smaller parties' candidates, increasing polarisation between his allies and those of Fernandez. Generally regarded as far more moderate than CFK, Fernandez will find himself limited in his policy choices by both economic constraints and demands of more radical Kirchnerist groups such as the youth movement La Campora. Given his own lack of an independent support base, those groups will not hesitate to emphasise that his election victory was due to Kirchnerist backing. This shift in post-election emphasis towards CFK has already begun. After first ceding the presidential candidacy and then maintaining a low profile during the campaign in a bid to downplay the controversies that surround her, CFK was very much centre stage on election night, and the Frente de Todos celebrations were dominated by images of CFK and her late husband, former President Nestor Kirchner. -
Download PDF Van Tekst
In het land der blinden Willem Oltmans bron Willem Oltmans, In het land der blinden. Papieren tijger, Breda 2001 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/oltm003inhe01_01/colofon.php © 2015 dbnl / Willem Oltmans Stichting 2 voor Jozias van Aartsen Willem Oltmans, In het land der blinden 7 1 Start Op 10 augustus 1953 besteeg ik voor het eerst de lange trappen naar de bovenste verdieping van het gebouw van het Algemeen Handelsblad aan de Nieuwezijds Voorburgwal in Amsterdam om mijn leven als journalist te beginnen. Chef van de redactie buitenland was dr. Anton Constandse. Van 1946 tot en met 1948 had ik de opleiding voor de diplomatieke dienst gevolgd van het Nederlands Opleidings Instituut voor het Buitenland (NOIB) op Nijenrode. Van 1948 tot en met 1950 volgde ik op het Yale College in New Haven, Connecticut, de studie Political Science and International Relations. Inmiddels 25 jaar geworden twijfelde ik steeds meer aan een leven als ambtenaar van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Was ik niet een te vrijgevochten en te zelfstandig denkende vogel om zonder tegensputteren of mokken braaf Haagse opdrachten uit te voeren waar ik het wellicht faliekant mee oneens zou zijn? Van een dergelijke incompatibilité d'humeurs zou immers alleen maar gedonder kunnen komen. Op het Yale College had ik in dit verband al het een en ander meegemaakt. In 1949 was ik tot praeses van de Yale International Club gekozen, een organisatie voor de in New Haven studerende buitenlandse studenten. Nederland knokte in die dagen onder de noemer van ‘politionele acties’ tegen Indonesië. Ik nodigde ambassadeur F.C.A. -
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33. -
GENERAL ELECTIONS in NETHERLANDS 12Th September 2012
GENERAL ELECTIONS IN NETHERLANDS 12th September 2012 European Elections monitor Victory for the pro-European parties in the General Elections in the Netherlands Corinne Deloy Translated by helen Levy The People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the liberal party led by outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte came first in the general elections on 12th September in the Netherlands. The party won 26.5% of the vote, the highest score in its history and won 41 seats (+10 than in the previous elections that took place on 9th June 2010). “It is an Results exceptional victory because he is the leader of the biggest party in office. There are many European countries in which the leaders lost the elections as this crisis rages,” analyses Andre Krouwel, a political expert at the Free University of Amsterdam. The liberals took a slight lead over the Labour Party (PvdA) led by Diederik Samsom, which won 24.7% of the vote and 39 seats (+9). At first the electoral campaign, which focused on the crisis, turned to the advantage of the most radical opposition forces, and those most hostile to the European Union (Socialist Party and the Freedom Party). Over the last few days however the situation developed further and the pro-European forces recovered ground. Together the Liberals and Labour rallied 80 seats, i.e. an absolute majority in the States General, the lower chamber in the Dutch Parliament. The populist parties suffered a clear rebuttal. On Turnout was slightly less than that recorded in the the right the Freedom Party (PVV) won 10.1% of last general elections on 9th June 2010 the vote, taking 15 seats (-9). -
Argentina Devalues Currency; Braces for Opposition Attacks Andrã©S Gaudãn
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiSur Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 2-14-2014 Argentina Devalues Currency; Braces for Opposition Attacks Andrés GaudÃn Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur Recommended Citation GaudÃn, Andrés. "Argentina Devalues Currency; Braces for Opposition Attacks." (2014). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ notisur/14215 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiSur by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 79218 ISSN: 1060-4189 Argentina Devalues Currency; Braces for Opposition Attacks by Andrés Gaudín Category/Department: Argentina Published: 2014-02-14 Following Argentine legislative elections that narrowed the gap between the opposition and the ruling party, power groups and major media have pushed President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (CFK) to devalue the country’s currency. Though opposition parties gained ground, they did not win the election. The government had held that its efforts to maintain monetary stability was a major achievement allowing it to enrich foreign-exchange reserves and develop social policy. However, on Jan. 24, persistent market movement culminated with the end of monetary stability, one of the pillars of the Kirchner administrations that began in 2003 with the late President Néstor Kirchner (2003-2007) and continued under his wife who was elected following his death in 2007. The same day as the devaluation, economist Raúl Dellatorre said, "The government had to face a most difficult economic decision, one it had always rejected because of predictable regressive consequences. -
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE_PV(2005)0118_1 MINUTES Meeting of 18 January 2005, 9.00 – 12.30 and 15.00 – 18.30, and 19 January 2005, 9.00 – 12.30 and 15.00 – 18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.00 on Tuesday 18 January 2005, with Jean-Louis Bourlanges (Chair) in the chair. Public seminar: ‘Promoting better quality in criminal justice in Europe’ (Costa report): Tuesday 18 January 2005, 15.00 – 16.30, ASP 3 E 2 1. Adoption of draft agenda The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements 3. Presentation of the Luxembourg Presidency’s work programme and priorities by Luc Frieden and Nicolas Schmit, co-Presidents-in-Office of the Justice and Home Affairs Council LIBE/6/25400 - Exchange of views Speakers: Luc Frieden and Nicolas Schmit (Luxembourg Presidency), Sarah Ludford, Martine Roure, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Michael Cashman, Ewa Klamt, Inger Segelström, Barbara Kudrycka, Agustín Díaz De Mera García Consuegra, Antoine Duquesne, Kathalijne Buitenweg, Mario Borghezio and Jean-Louis Bourlanges. PV\612568EN.doc PE372.176v01-00 EN EN Tuesday 18 January 2005, 16.30 – 18.15: Joint debate 4. Follow-up to the European Council meeting of 17 December 2004 on the fight against terrorism, in the presence of Luc Frieden, Luxembourg Presidency, and Gijs de Vries, European Union Counter-Terrorism Coordinator Speakers: Luc Frieden (Luxembourg Presidency), Gijs de Vries (European Union Counter-Terrorism Coordinator), Rosa Díez González, Stavros Lambrinidis, Mario Borghezio, Johannes Voggenhuber, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Johannes Blokland, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Edith Mastenbroek and Antoine Duquesne. -
Presentación De Powerpoint
ANÁLISIS DEL ESCENARIO POLÍTICO Y PERSPECTIVAS Noviembre de 2019 UNA MIRADA A LOS RESULTADOS ELECTORALES QUÉ PUEDE ESPERAR EL SECTOR DE CADA UNO DE LOS CANDIDATOS RESULTADO 2019 RESULTADO 2019 Según triunfo por municipio Según triunfo por municipio RESULTADO TOTAL PAÍS* Fernández Kirchner Macri Pichetto Lavagna Urtubey Del Caño Del Pla P.A.S.O. GENERAL G. Centurión Hotton Espert Rosales Otros * Escrutinio Definitivo (Elección General) Fuente: Synopsis en base a Cámara Nac. Electoral QUÉ PUEDE ESPERAR EL SECTOR DE CADA UNO DE LOS CANDIDATOS 1.668.540 VOTOS LAS DOS PRINCIPALES FUERZAS SE REPARTIERON FRENTE DE TODOS JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO PASO GENERAL JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO SE LLEVÓ EL FRENTE DE TODOS JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO CONSENSO FEDERAL FIT FRENTE NOS UNITE MOV. AL SOCIALISMO QUÉ PUEDE ESPERAR EL SECTOR DE CADA UNO DE LOS CANDIDATOS DIFERENCIA EN % DE VOTOS ENTRE PASO Y GENERAL PARA JXC DIFERENCIA DE VOTOS ENTRE PASO Y GENERAL PARA JXC EN % DE VOTOS POR PROVINCIA EN CANTIDAD DE VOTOS POR PROVINCIA Salta 75,6 Buenos Aires 561.617 Jujuy 53,4 Cordoba 370.992 Chaco 50,7 Santa Fe 252.148 Santa Cruz 47,0 Capital Federal 167.965 Tucumán 43,5 Mendoza 155.112 San Luis 40,7 Salta 111.064 Mendoza 37,6 Tucumán 103.955 Santa Fe 37,3 Chaco 85.873 Sgo. del Estero 37,0 Entre Rios 85.391 Cordoba 36,8 Jujuy 63.350 Neuquen 36,4 Misiones 61.415 San Juan 36,2 San Juan 42.211 Misiones 34,8 Corrientes 41.990 Chubut 31,8 San Luis 39.528 Catamarca 31,4 Neuquen 39.526 T. -
Lobbyen Rutte-Kabinetten in Brussel Voor Burgers, of Voor Belangen?
Lobbyen Rutte-kabinetten in Brussel voor burgers, of voor belangen? Door Gastauteur - 1 september 2021 Geplaatst in Boeken - Europese Unie Op 8 september verschijnt het boek ‘Sluiproute Brussel’. Journaliste Lise Witteman beschrijft hoe de Rutte-kabinetten in de Europese achterkamers ijveren voor bedrijven en brancheorganisaties. In Wynia’s Week een voorpublicatie. Hoe Nederland lobbyde voor biometrische paspoorten en Frans Timmermans dreigde lakei van het bedrijfsleven te worden. door Lise Witteman Partijvoorzitter Ivo Opstelten mocht in 2008 dan een marketingbureau in de arm hebben genomen om uit te vogelen wat de VVD-prioriteiten zijn, in feite droeg Ruttes oude rivaal Rita Verdonk ze toen al jaren uit, vanuit de grond van haar hart. ‘IJzeren Rita’ stond pal voor een streng migratiebeleid en voor compromisloze handhaving. Als minister van Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie tijdens het kabinet-Balkenende II van CDA, VVD en D66 (2003-2006) zette de populaire VVD’er niet alleen in eigen land, maar ook in Europees verband in op een hard-rechts beleid. In Brussel wedijverde ze voor strengere migratiemaatregelen en uitbreiding van handhavings- en opsporingsbevoegdheden voor politie en justitie. Daarmee vergaarde ze in korte tijd zowel een grote schare fans als hartstochtelijke tegenstanders. Het geweten van Verdonk GroenLinks-Europarlementariër Kathalijne Buitenweg behoorde van meet af aan tot die laatste groep. Wynia's week: Lobbyen Rutte-kabinetten in Brussel voor burgers, of voor belangen? | 1 Lobbyen Rutte-kabinetten in Brussel voor burgers, of voor belangen? Volgens haar werd Nederland dankzij Verdonk Europees koploper in inhumaan asielbeleid. ‘Zelfs Berlusconi, die vele tienduizenden liet lijden, heeft een zuiverder geweten dan Rita Verdonk,’ zo liet ze zich in 2004 uit tegenover dagblad Trouw. -
Begrotingsbehandelingen 2018
Begrotingsbehandelingen 2018 38 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Bijzonderheden 18 september 19 en 21 2 tot 4 4 december september oktober Sociaal Volksgezondheid, Inbrengdatum voor Beantwoording feitelijke vragen door Ministerie van VWS voor Plenaire Plenaire behandeling Wetgevingsoverleg over Wetgevingsoverleg over De vaste commissie VWS heeft Welzijn en Sport feitelijke vragen over behandeling. van ontwerpbegroting begrotingsonderdeel begrotingsonderdeel besloten dit jaar geen gebruik te de ontwerpbegroting VWS in week 42 Jeugd 12 november Sport en Bewegen maken van rapporteurs. Volksgezondheid, (16 - 18 oktober). 10.00 - 17.00 uur. 19 november Welzijn en Sport op 10.00 - 17.00 uur. 26 september 2018. Sociale Zaken en Inbrengdatum voor Beantwoording feitelijke vragen door Ministerie van SZW voor Plenaire behandeling. Wetgevingsoverleg over Plenaire behandeling De vaste commissie SZW Werkgelegenheid feitelijke vragen over begrotingsonderdeel van ontwerpbegroting ziet af van het aanwijzen van de ontwerpbegroting Inburgering en SZW in week 48 rapporteurs. Sociale Zaken en integratie 19 november (27 - 29 november). Werkgelegenheid op 17.00 - 22.00 uur of 17 oktober. 26 november 15.30 - 20.30 uur. Bestuur Binnenlandse Inbrengdatum voor Inbrengdatum voor Beantwoording Plenaire behandeling Wetgevingsoverleg over De vaste commissie BZ heeft Zaken feitelijke vragen op feitelijke vragen op feitelijke vragen door van ontwerpbegroting begrotingsonderdeel besloten dit jaar geen gebruik te het gebied van de het gebied van de Ministerie van BZK voor BZ in week 42 Wonen en Ruimte maken van rapporteurs. ontwerpbegroting de ontwerpbegroting Plenaire behandeling. (16 - 18 oktober). 12 november Koning en Algemene Staten-Generaal, 18.30 - 22.30 uur. Zaken op dinsdag Overige Hoge Colleges 25 september 14.00 uur. -
Chapter 36 Netherlands: the Pedophile Kingdom and Sodom and Gomorrah of the Modern World Joachim Hagopian
Chapter 36 Netherlands: The Pedophile Kingdom and Sodom and Gomorrah of the Modern World Joachim Hagopian Cover Credit: Nora Maccoby with permission http://www.noramaccoby.com/ The lineage of former Holy Roman and French nobility comprises today’s House of Orange-Nassau ruling over the constitutional monarchy of the Netherlands. The Dutch royalty owns major multinational corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Philips Electronics and Holland-America Line.1 The royal family has evolved its interests as a high-level authority currently operating as a branch of the Vatican’s Roman empire, wielding considerable influence over such powerful entities as the Rand Corporation, Koch Industries, Princeton University (founded in honor of the House of Orange), some of the world’s largest banks including AMRO and investment firms like BlackRock,2 the largest financial asset management institution on the planet, worth an estimated $7.4 trillion in client assets.3 Coincided by design with the planned Corona scamdemic, this year BlackRock’s been busily bailing out the US Federal Reserve, buying billions worth of bonds to keep the house of cards economy from imploding, in one fell swoop in April seizing control over the US Treasury and Federal Reserve.4 This private, unelected monolith has monopoly control now over the entire US economy as the centralized economic chokehold over the global masses prepares to tighten its death grip noose over humanity.5 As the long planned implosion of the world economy goes up in smoke, by engineered design, this latest power grab amidst the so called pandemic crisis is all about consolidation of power and control into fewer and fewer hands, lending new meaning to the thoroughly bankrupted USA Corporation owned and operated by the financial juggernaut of “the Crown.”6 The stakes have never been higher in 2020. -
PRIMARY ELECTIONS Special Report
PRIMARY ELECTIONS Special Report WHAT IS AT STAKE? Provincial Elections President 24 130 National Representatives Provinces of Catamarca, Buenos Aires, and the City of Vicepresident National Senators Buenos Aires held primary elections to governor while Santa Cruz had general election. NATIONAL PROVISIONAL RESULTS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTIONS s 47.65% PARTICIPATION: 75,78% Alberto Fernández – Cristina Fernández de Kirchner 32.08% Mauricio Macri - Miguel Ángel Pichetto 8.22% Roberto Lavagna – Juan Manuel Urtubey 2.86% Nicolás del Caño – Romina del Pla 2.63% Juan J. Gómez Centurión – Cynthia Hotton 2.18% José Luis Espert – Luis Rosales ELECTORAL THRESHOLD 1.5% 0.71% Manuela Castañeira – Eduardo Mulhall 0.24% Alejandro Biondini – Enrique Venturino 0.14% Raul Albarracín – Sergio Pastore 0.13% José Antonio Romero Feris – Guillermo Sueldo POLITICAL SUPPORT KEYS #1 THE CENTER REGION VOTE #2 BUENOS AIRES SUPPORT #3 THE REST OF THE COUNTRY The National Government In the first section of the Other provinces, mainly driven expected to count with greater province of Buenos Aires, by the support of several support in Córdoba and Santa bastion of Cambiemos in 2015 Peronist governors, also added Fe, that along with Mendoza, and 2017, the officialism got an important part of votes that would provide a number of adverse results from expected summed up in the final result votes to face the tight scenario while in the other two -of an led Alberto Fernández to win in the province of Buenos Aires, average lower income-, the with several points ahead. but finally it turned the opposite Frente de Todos prevailed with way. -
Who Revived the Basic Income Debate? Investigating the Role of Social Media in the Political Agenda-Setting Process
Who revived the basic income debate? Investigating the role of social media in the political agenda-setting process Naam: Erwin Gielens ANR: 853440 Collegejaar: 2017-2018 Research master social and behavioral sciences Sociology track Begeleider: dr. F. Roosma 1 Abstract This study addresses the lack of scholarly attention for the role of social media in the political agenda- setting process. It is expected that social media help draw attention of politicians by making some issues more visible and increasing their urgency. Taking the basic income debate on Twitter as a case study, I find that high public attention coincides with high political attention, although debate integration and leadership do not meaningfully predict these spikes in attention. The content of conversations reveals that politicians engage in discussion because Twitter cues the public relevance of particular issue, facilitates the diffusion of information and lowers barriers to participation in public debate. Politicians that support the issue are more likely to respond to public attention, while opposing politicians tend to refrain from engagement until impending political consequences make the issue urgent. The overall implication is that social media can modulate the impact of traditional media coverage on political agendas. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have seen the light of day without the invaluable help of many friends, family and colleagues. First and foremost, my gratitude goes out to dr. Femke Roosma and prof. dr. Peter Achterberg, my supervisors who helped to assemble, develop and finetune the idea that finally made its way to print. Their supervision struck me as a good cop – bad cop experience, marked by the encouraging words of dr.