DOCSLIB.ORG

Overall Donor Ranking As 31 December 2020 in USD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overall Donor Ranking As 31 December 2020 in USD 2020 Pledges to UNRWA's Programmes (Cash and In-kind) - Overall Donor Ranking as 31 December 2020 In USD Programme Budget Non Programme Budget TOTAL RANK Donor Programme Total Programme Budget SSNP In-kind Budget EA oPt Syria Appeal Projects Covid-19 Germany 70,108,549 0 0 70,108,549 39,129,287 28,178,624 39,795,043 33,172,836 210,384,339 1 EU 95,605,399 0 0 95,605,399 1,155,524 46,688,821 161 13,609,330 157,059,235 2 UK 53,017,612 0 0 53,017,612 1,328,346 9,139,141 644,335 0 64,129,434 3 Sweden 56,036,602 0 237,903 56,274,505 2,590,942 1,554,565 0 0 60,420,012 4 Japan 15,932,688 9,573 245,573 16,187,833 7,071,644 4,105,981 4,169,110 1,545,454 33,080,021 5 Switzerland 23,030,475 0 381,375 23,411,850 0 0 250,810 5,867,153 29,529,812 6 Saudi Arabia 28,933,333 0 0 28,933,333 0 0 0 0 28,933,333 7 Norway 16,545,592 0 0 16,545,592 0 10,076,350 133,815 1,131,844 27,887,600 8 CERF 0 0 0 0 22,293,277 600,000 976,441 1,000,000 24,869,718 9 Canada 18,376,723 0 0 18,376,723 0 3,852,080 765,697 1,088,907 24,083,407 10 France 18,131,721 818,777 111,138 19,061,636 1,386,959 1,091,703 308,112 1,137,656 22,986,067 11 Netherlands 21,517,245 0 0 21,517,245 0 0 613,569 0 22,130,814 12 Turkey 10,000,000 899,910 0 10,899,910 9,661,115 0 0 0 20,561,025 13 Italy 9,828,212 0 129,852 9,958,064 2,986,858 4,206,983 562,195 0 17,714,100 14 Denmark 15,612,280 0 0 15,612,280 0 0 104,875 0 15,717,155 15 Spain (including Regional Governments) 10,567,287 416,887 92,555 11,076,729 860,164 747,532 1,289,740 384,097 14,358,262 16 Belgium (including Government of Flanders) 7,055,684 0 0 7,055,684 0 2,702,703 3,444,901 0 13,203,288 17 Finland 10,242,571 0 110,000 10,352,571 0 0 0 0 10,352,571 18 Ireland 7,818,438 0 23,200 7,841,638 0 1,091,703 0 0 8,933,341 19 Australia 8,393,204 0 0 8,393,204 0 0 0 0 8,393,204 20 Qatar 8,000,000 0 0 8,000,000 0 0 0 0 8,000,000 21 Jordan 0 0 7,392,615 7,392,615 0 0 0 0 7,392,615 22 OCHA 0 0 0 0 0 4,938,720 174,390 1,958,759 7,071,869 23 WHO 0 0 202,980 202,980 0 0 33,000 5,368,861 5,604,841 24 Luxembourg 5,572,075 0 0 5,572,075 0 0 0 0 5,572,075 25 Austria 2,663,748 0 0 2,663,748 0 2,356,348 29,412 0 5,049,507 26 India 5,000,000 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 5,000,000 27 Palestine 0 0 4,176,174 4,176,174 0 0 0 10,000 4,186,174 28 WFP 0 0 0 0 0 3,825,701 0 0 3,825,701 29 China 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 2,291,904 3,291,904 30 UNRWA USA National Committee 878,000 0 0 878,000 1,358,000 0 162,550 609,500 3,008,050 31 Islamic Relief USA 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,740,000 0 2,740,000 32 King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Centre 0 0 0 0 1,455,000 0 0 1,000,000 2,455,000 33 Russia 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 34 UNICEF 0 0 120,751 120,751 0 283,325 984,111 386,000 1,774,187 35 UNRWA Spanish Committee 1,663,407 0 0 1,663,407 0 0 0 2,172 1,665,579 36 Qatar Charity 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 1,500,000 37 Republic of Korea 1,164,611 0 0 1,164,611 0 0 0 0 1,164,611 38 UN-HABITAT 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 60,000 0 1,060,000 39 UAE 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 40 Education Cannot Wait Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 41 Muslim World League 557,096 0 0 557,096 0 0 442,904 0 1,000,000 42 Al Ansari Holding L.L.C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 43 Poland 792,645 0 0 792,645 0 0 0 0 792,645 44 Mexico 750,000 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 45 Novo Nordisk 0 0 704,550 704,550 0 0 0 31,500 736,050 46 Foundation to Promote Open Society (FPOS) 150,000 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 550,000 700,000 47 Norwegian Refugee Council 0 0 688,686 688,686 0 0 0 0 688,686 48 Monaco 0 0 131,404 131,404 0 2,198 428,857 54,289 616,748 49 New Zealand 595,300 0 0 595,300 0 0 0 0 595,300 50 Development Action without Borders, Naba'a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 573,640 573,640 51 International Islamic Charitable Organization (IICO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 519,292 0 519,292 52 UNDP 0 0 0 0 0 81,726 0 411,322 493,048 53 RedR Australia 0 0 471,932 471,932 0 0 0 0 471,932 54 Syria 0 0 457,279 457,279 0 0 0 0 457,279 55 Oman 0 0 0 0 216,262 0 216,375 0 432,637 56 Iceland 196,974 0 0 196,974 0 0 118,065 0 315,039 57 Estonia 308,911 0 0 308,911 0 0 0 0 308,911 58 Azerbaijan 300,000 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 59 UNHCR 0 0 0 0 0 255,172 0 0 255,172 60 Czech Republic 0 0 0 0 128,055 103,492 0 0 231,547 61 Southern New Hampshire University 0 0 0 0 0 0 225,000 0 225,000 62 Lebanon 0 0 224,931 224,931 0 0 0 0 224,931 63 UNESCO 62,416 0 158,258 220,674 0 0 0 0 220,674 64 Campaign For the Children of Palestine, Japan 0 0 218,614 218,614 0 0 0 0 218,614 65 Indonesia 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 66 Hasene International e.V 53,456 0 0 53,456 0 0 111,086 21,716 186,258 67 Handicap International 0 0 171,900 171,900 0 0 0 0 171,900 68 Cyprus 168,000 0 0 168,000 0 0 0 0 168,000 69 Malaysia (including Zakat Pulau Pinang-ZPP) 120,000 0 0 120,000 0 0 13,347 0 133,347 70 RKK 11,640 0 53,012 64,652 0 0 65,000 0 129,652 71 IDB 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 72 Kuwait Red Crescent Society 0 0 0 0 65,000 0 0 50,000 115,000 73 Brunei Darussalam 114,712 0 0 114,712 0 0 0 0 114,712 74 Canadian Palestinian Professional Foundation 0 0 0 0 0 0 107,336 0 107,336 75 Liechtenstein 103,093 0 0 103,093 0 0 0 0 103,093 76 Kazakhstan 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 77 The Big Heart Foundation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 78 Malta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83,910 83,910 79 Portugal 81,350 0 0 81,350 0 0 0 0 81,350 80 Friends of Birzeit University (Fobzu) 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,907 0 78,907 81 Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,263 77,263 82 Brazil 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 83 Thailand 70,000 0 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 70,000 84 Muslim Hands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62,495 62,495 85 UNFPA 0 0 62,189 62,189 0 0 0 0 62,189 86 Lithuania 54,289 0 0 54,289 0 0 0 0 54,289 87 Slovenia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,289 54,289 88 Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization 0 0 50,202 50,202 0 0 0 0 50,202 89 Bahrain 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 90 Bangladesh 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 91 Vietnam 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 92 Greece 44,867 0 0 44,867 0 0 0 0 44,867 93 Romania 44,300 0 0 44,300 0 0 0 0 44,300 94 Save the children 0 0 37,994 37,994 0 0 0 0 37,994 95 Deutsche Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,000 29,194 37,194 96 ANERA 0 0 36,092 36,092 0 0 0 0 36,092 97 World Federation of KSIMC 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,300 0 33,300 98 FundaciÓn Real Madrid, Spain 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,580 0 22,580 99 Latvia 20,812 0 0 20,812 0 0 0 0 20,812 100 Egypt 20,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 101 Holy See 20,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 102 Slovakia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,797 16,797 103 Kutxa Foundation, Spain 16,755 0 0 16,755 0 0 0 0 16,755 104 Bancaja-Bankia Foundation 14,134 0 0 14,134 0 0 0 0 14,134 105 Pakistan 13,690 0 0 13,690 0 0 0 0 13,690 106 Queen Margaret University 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,351 0 12,351 107 Gulf for Good 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,227 10,227 108 Caja Navarra Foundation 0 8,288 0 8,288 0 0 0 0 8,288 109 Islamic Help 0 6,305 0 6,305 0 0 0 0 6,305 110 Landmark Amman Hotel 5,088 0 0 5,088 0 0 0 0 5,088 111 Gazze Destek Derneği (GDD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,750 0 4,750 112 Vitamin Angels 0 0 2,694 2,694 0 0 0 0 2,694 113 United Nations 30,550,904 0 0 30,550,904 0 0 0 0 30,550,904 Private Sector Funding * 1,101,003 0 2,264,095 3,365,097 1,368,761 20,832 38,470 695,761 5,488,921 Total 561,486,889 2,159,740 18,957,948 582,604,577 95,555,193 126,903,701 60,807,885 74,461,873 940,333,229 * Private Sector Funding includes contributions from individual donors..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E Me Rg Ency F Ood a Ss Is Ta
    Amran Sa'ada Sana'a Marib d June 2016 e - CARE International Yemen - Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development - Civil Confederacy - Islamic Relief Yemen n - Enjaz foundation fpr development - Danish Refugee Council c - Islamic Relief Yemen - Global ChangeMakers Yemen a Saudi Arabia - Life and Peace Coalition Total Number of Beneficiaries in need of - Qatar Charity - Islamic Relief Yemen - Islamic Relief Yemen - Qatar Charity y n - Life and Peace Coalition - Life and Peace Coalition t - Mercy Corps Æ Emergency Food Assistance i - Sama Al Yemen c - Norwegian Refugee Council - Qatar Charity r a - Responsiveness for Relief and Development - Oxford Committee for Famine Relief - Sanid Org. for Relief and Development Al Jawf - World Food Programme u 7.6 M t - Sama Al Yemen - Adventist Development and Relief Agency - Qatar Charity c - World Food Programme - Social Association for Development - Sanid Org. for Relief and Development s - Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development e - World Food Programme Total Number of Beneficiaries Reached i - Qatar Charity - Social Association for Development S - International Organization for Migration - World Food Programme 4.0 M s d Hajjah - Islamic Help United Kingdom s o - Abs Development Organization - World Food Programme Amanat Al Asimah o - Action Contra La Faim 6 - Direct Aid A - CARE International Yemen F 1 - Life and Peace Coalition - Bunia Social Charities Association e - Life Flow for Peace & Development Organization 0 - Global ChangeMakers Yemen d h - National Foundation for Development and Human Rights 2 t - National Foundation for Development and Human Rights - Norwegian Refugee Council o - National Prisoner Foundation e SA'ADA y - Oxford Committee for Famine Relief - Qatar Charity n b - Social Association for Development o - Relief International u 5% - United Nations Children's Fund d - Sanid Org.
    [Show full text]
  • Philanthropy Law Report
    QATAR Philanthropy Law Report International Center for Not-for-Profit Law 1126 16th Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 452-8600 www.icnl.org Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Recent Developments ..................................................................................................................... 3 Relevant Laws ................................................................................................................................. 5 Constitutional Framework .............................................................................................................. 5 National Laws and Regulations Affecting Philanthropic Giving ...................................................... 5 Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Organizational Forms for Nonprofit Organizations ...................................................................... 10 Registration of Domestic Nonprofit Organizations ...................................................................... 11 Registration of Foreign Nonprofit Organizations ......................................................................... 16 Nonprofit Organization Activities ................................................................................................. 16 Termination, Dissolution, and Sanctions .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Origination, Organization, and Prevention: Saudi Arabia, Terrorist Financing and the War on Terror”
    Testimony of Steven Emerson with Jonathan Levin Before the United States Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs “Terrorism Financing: Origination, Organization, and Prevention: Saudi Arabia, Terrorist Financing and the War on Terror” July 31, 2003 Steven Emerson Executive Director The Investigative Project 5505 Conn. Ave NW #341 Washington DC 20015 Email: [email protected] phone 202-363-8602 fax 202 966 5191 Introduction Terrorism depends upon the presence of three primary ingredients: Indoctrination, recruitment and financing. Take away any one of those three ingredients and the chances for success are geometrically reduced. In the nearly two years since the horrific attacks of 9/11, the war on terrorism has been assiduously fought by the US military, intelligence and law enforcement. Besides destroying the base that Al Qaeda used in Afghanistan, the United States has conducted a comprehensive campaign in the United States to arrest, prosecute, deport or jail those suspected of being connected to terrorist cells. The successful prosecution of terrorist cells in Detroit and Buffalo and the announcement of indictments against suspected terrorist cells in Portland, Seattle, northern Virginia, Chicago, Tampa, Brooklyn, and elsewhere have demonstrated the resolve of those on the front line in the battle against terrorism. Dozens of groups, financial conduits and financiers have seen their assets frozen or have been classified as terrorist by the US Government. One of the most sensitive areas of investigation remains the role played by financial entities and non-governmental organizations (ngo’s) connected to or operating under the aegis of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Since the July 24 release of the “Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001,” the question of what role Saudi Arabia has played in supporting terrorism, particularly Al Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks, has come under increasing scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Qatar Charity in Niger: Biopolitics of an International Islamic NGO
    WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 73 Qatar Charity in Niger: Biopolitics of an international Islamic NGO Chloe Dugger [email protected] February 2011 Refugee Studies Centre Oxford Department of International Development University of Oxford Working Paper Series The Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series is intended to aid the rapid distribution of work in progress, research findings and special lectures by researchers and associates of the RSC. Papers aim to stimulate discussion among the worldwide community of scholars, policymakers and practitioners. They are distributed free of charge in PDF format via the RSC website. Bound hard copies of the working papers may also be requested from the Centre. The opinions expressed in the papers are solely those of the author/s who retain the copyright. They should not be attributed to the project funders or the Refugee Studies Centre, the Oxford Department of International Development or the University of Oxford. Comments on individual Working Papers are welcomed, and should be directed to the author/s. Further details may be found at the RSC website (www.rsc.ox.ac.uk). The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect RSC views. RSC does not warrant in anyway the accuracy of the information quoted and may not be held liable for any loss caused by reliance on the accuracy or reliability thereof. RSC WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 73 2 Contents List of Figures 4 List of Abbreviations and Acronyms 5 Glossary 5 1 Introduction 6 Contribution of the study 7 Structure of the
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants by Organization
    2014 ANNUAL WFP PARTNERSHIP CONSULTATION List of participants by organization: ACTIONAID Mr. Bijay Kumar Country Director for ActionAid Kenya Mr. John Abuya Head of International Humanitarian Action and Resilience Team Donna Muwonge Multilateral Partnerships Manager – International Partnership Development ACTED Mr. Luca Pupulin Director of Programmes ACTION CONTRE LA FAIM Mr. Mike Penrose Executive Director Mr. Vincent Taillandier Director of Operations ADRA Mr. Frank Teeuwen Director, United Nations Liaison Officer AGA KHAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK Mr. Aly Nazerali CEO and Senior Advisor for Policy, Communications and Institutional Relations Mr. Najmi Kanji Programme Director, Special Programmes AVSI Mr. Alberto Piatti Secretary General Ms. Maria Teresa Gatti Knowledge Center & Communication Manager BASIC EDUCATION AND EMPLOYABLE Mr. Hamish Khan Managing Director SKILL TRAINING (BEST) THE CASH LEARNING PARTNERSHIP Ms. Sara Almer Coordinator (CALP) Ms. Nadia Zuodar Technical Coordinator 2014 ANNUAL WFP PARTNERSHIP CONSULTATION CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK Mr. Jim Cornelius Executive Director CANADIAN HUNGER FOUNDATION Mr. Stewart Hardacre President & CEO (CHF) Ms. Adair Heuchan Board Director CARE CANADA Ms. Jacquelin Wright Vice President of International Programs Ms. Jessie Thomson Director, Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Team CARE USA Mr. Justus Liku Senior Advisor for Emergency Food and Nutrition Security CARITAS INTERNATIONALIS Ms. Floriana Polito Humanitarian Policy Officer CONCERN WORLDWIDE Mr. Dominic MacSorley CEO Ms. Olive Towey Head of Advocacy COORDINADORA ONG PARA EL Mr. François Parnaud ACF - WFP HQ contract referent DESARROLLO ESPANA Mr. Vincent Stehli Director of Operations, ACF Spain Mr. Julien Jacob Food Security and Livelihoods Advisor, ACF Spain DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL Mr. Rasmus Stuhr Jakobsen Chief, Division of Emergency Safety and Supply FOCUS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC EVALUATION FAO/WFP Joint Evaluation of Food Security Cluster Coordination in Humanitarian Action
    measuring results, sharing lessons results, measuring sharing STRATEGIC EVALUATION FAO/WFP Joint Evaluation of Food Security Cluster Coordination in Humanitarian Action A Strategic Evaluation Evaluation Report August 2014 Prepared by Julia Steets, Team Leader; James Darcy, Senior Evaluator; Lioba Weingärtner, Senior Evaluator; Pierre Leguéné, Senior Evaluator Commissioned by the FAO and WFP Offices of Evaluation Report number: OEV/2013/012 Acknowledgements The evaluation team would like to thank all of those who provided support and input for this evaluation. We are particularly grateful for the clear guidance and constructive cooperation of the evaluation managers, the extensive support of the Food Security Cluster’s Global Support Team, the input and feedback of the Reference Group, the excellent facilitation of all of our country missions by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Food Programme (WFP) and the many individuals working for the United Nations, and the international and national NGOs and governments that provided their time and insights by participating in the survey and in interviews. Our special thanks go to Rahel Dette and Maximilian Norz, who provided valuable research support. Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the World Food Programme (WFP). Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by FAO or WFP of the opinions expressed. The designations employed and the presentation of material in the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO or WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • 20201231 Irq 2020 Humanitari
    IRAQ 2020 Humanitarian Funding Overview As of 31 December 2020 US$662.2M US$609.1¹ (US$99.6M) TOTAL HRP & COVID-19 FUNDING RECEIVED FOR COVID-19 FUNDING RECEIVED FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 92% HRP & COVID-19 as of 31 December 2020 (US$264.8M) FUNDED US$53.1M (US$165.2M) TOTAL COVID-19 COMPONENT8 HRP & COVID-19 UNMET COVID-19 FUNDING UNMET REQUIREMENTS as of 31 December 2020 BY CLUSTER FOR HRP & COVID-19 (US$) US$846.6M TOTAL FUNDING RECEIVED Cluster Funding received Overall HRP & COVID Requirements as of 31 December 2020 Total COVID-199 Received Gap Total COVID-199 US$609.1M HRP & COVID-19 FUNDING THROUGH 2020 HRP CCCM 4.2M (0.6M) 25.6M (24.2M) 71.9% 28.1% US$237.5M Education 9.8M (0.4M) 30.9M (2.6M) FUNDING OUTSIDE 2020 HRP & COVID-19² 25.9M (10.2M) EL 18.3M (2.0M) BY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES (SO)4 SO1 SO2 Combined FSC 31.6M (5.8M) 83.1M (21.2M) 3% ADDITIONAL COVID-19 REQUEST³ Health 42.4M (21.6M) 103.8M6 (65.4M) Protection, $519.8 $142.4 34.8M (0.8M) 97.7M (53.5M) 48% million HLP &MA million 49% CP 14.0M (3.3M) 39.2M (5.1M) 20.1M (5.2M) 31.6M (12.6M) COVID-19 COMPONENT GBV ($122.4M) WITHIN SO1 & SO2 Shelter/NFI 8.1M (0M) 50.8M (7.6M) BREAKDOWN OF CASH FUNDING REQUESTS BY CLUSTER5 24.7M WASH (5.4M) 52.0M (19.4M) 3% 2% 0.02% 7% MPCA 10.9M (8.0M) 86.2M (43.0M) 12% $213 41% CCS 6.5M - 15.0M - million Not specified 323.9M (34.2M) 77.7M 34% MPCA FS Protection EL Multiple clusters 59.9M (12.4M) 14.1M WASH SNFI Education BY DONOR (US$) (TOP TEN DONORS) US$609.1 million HRP FUNDING RECEIVED 330.7M $ HRP Funding BY PARTNER TYPE 4% 3% 6% 15% 71 partners7 49.3M 37.7M 34.9M 72% 25.7M 19.6M 16.4M 16.0M 9.1M 9.0M INGO UN NNGO European United USA Germany Canada Commission Japan Norway Australia Kingdom Netherlands Kuwait Pooled fund IO 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports for Peace and Development
    صدقاتكم نوصلها هدايا للمستحقين We Deliver it Your Sadaqah to Those Most is a Gift Deserving + 250,000 مستفيد ًسنويا +100,000 Beneficiaries مستخدم Users Per Year RACA License No: 904/2019 اآلن يمكنــك أن تطلــب مــن مكانــك خدمــة المحصــل المنزلــي لتحصيــل تبرعــك عبــر مســح رمــز QR مــن جوالــك NOW We Come to Your Home Now Scan QR Code to Request a QC Representative طرق التبرع qcharity.org 44667711 qch.qa.app Qatar Charity is a leading Dignity international non-gov- for All ernmental organization working in the field of hu- manitarian aid and devel- opment since 1992; and was established in compliance with the laws regulating the non-profit sector in the State of Qatar. الخيرية قطر عن تصدر دورية مجلة دورية تصدر عن قطر الخيرية Editorial وعشرونby Qatar Charity أثنانMagazine العدد Periodic هـ 1441 23 رمضان.Issue No م 2020 أبريل أبريل Muharram 1442 AH - September 2020 The new issue of the “Ghiras” magazine comes out while the GENERAL SUPERVISOR coronavirus pandemic is still a serious threat to humankind across AHMED AL-ALI the globe, which has posed further challenges to humanitarian and charitable organizations in delivering services to the affected. Editor - in - Chief In this issue, readers will find a doctor, infected with COVID-19, Ali AL-RASHID from Qatar Charity’s field teams, setting an example in humanitarian action by continuing his work remotely despite the Managing Editor complications of the infection. TAMADOR AL-QADI It should also be noted that the pandemic could not prevent these institutions from carrying out their humanitarian duties at the EDITOR - CUM- TRANSLATOR time of certain crises like the massive explosion that has rocked MOHAMMAD ATAUR RAB the port area of Beirut.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Mobilization Strategy 2019-2021 2 Resource Mobilization Strategy 2019-2021 United Nations Relief and Works Agency 3
    united nations relief and works agency 1 resource mobilization strategy 2019-2021 2 resource mobilization strategy 2019-2021 united nations relief and works agency 3 resource mobilization strategy 2019-2021 4 resource mobilization strategy 2019-2021 © 2019 UNRWA About UNRWA UNRWA is a United Nations agency established by the General Assembly in 1949 and mandated to provide assistance and protection to some 5.4 million registered Palestine refugees. Its mission is to help Palestine refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank and the Gaza Strip achieve their full human development potential, pending a just and lasting solution to their plight. UNRWA services encompass education, health care, relief and social services, camp infrastructure and improvement, and microfinance. Cover photo: Palestine refugee students at the UNRWA Jalazone Girls’ School in the West Bank. © 2018 UNRWA Photo by Marwan Baghdadi united nations relief and works agency 5 acronyms and abbreviations AOR Annual Operations Report UNGA United Nations General Assembly ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations UNSG United Nations Secretary-General AU African Union WBG World Bank Group BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa WBMDTF World Bank Multi Donor Trust Fund CEAPAD Cooperation among East Asian Countries for Palestinian Development CERF UN Central Emergency Response Fund CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CSO Civil Society Organization EU European Union ERCD External Relations and Communication Department IDB Islamic Development Bank IFIs International
    [Show full text]
  • Qatar Charity and the United Nations Download
    Editorial In accordance with its vision and mission, Qatar Charity has realized since its inception the impor- tance of cooperation and building strategic partnerships with United Nations and international organizations to address the challenges of development and humanitarian work worldwide. This has become increasingly important as the world has witnessed an increase in the numbers of displaced people and refugees in recent years due to the outbreak of armed conflicts in many regions. This un- derlines the need for coordination with the humanitarian actors in various fields of relief work. This way, Qatar Charity has become an integral part of the international humanitarian system, seeking to serve and provide a decent life for every human being, and protect them from the grave effects of ignorance, poverty and violence. We have therefore decided to dedicate the editorial of this issue of Ghiras Magazine to highlighting Qatar Charity’s impressive record of achievements in the field of cooperation with international and UN organizations. In this regard, 93 cooperation and partnership protocols have been signed with 28 countries by the end of July this year, including 11 strategic cooperation agreements worth USD 126 million. The topics and facts discussed in this feature highlight how these partnerships contributed to the success of Qatar Charity in implementing large-scale integrated development programs such as the “Food Security” project and contributing to combating poverty and mitigating the effects of famine and drought in Niger over a period of seven years (2010 – 2017). These partnerships also reflect in Qatar Charity’s ranking first for several years among international humanitarian NGOs providing re- lief aid to the Syrian people, according to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS) report of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
    [Show full text]
  • Total Confirmed Pledges and Funds Received Towards UNRWA's Programmes As 30 December 2020
    2020 Total Confirmed Pledges and Funds received towards UNRWA's Programmes as 30 December 2020 TOTAL US$ Donor Confirmed Pledges Received Australia 8,393,204 8,393,204 Austria 5,049,494 5,049,494 Azerbaijan 300,000 300,000 Bahrain 50,000 50,000 Bangladesh 50,000 50,000 Belgium (including Government of Flanders) 13,203,288 13,080,662 Brunei Darussalam 114,712 114,712 Bulgaria 77,263 77,263 Brazil 75,000 75,000 Canada 24,083,407 24,083,407 China 3,291,904 3,291,904 Cyprus 168,000 168,000 Czech Republic 231,547 231,547 Denmark 15,717,155 15,717,155 EU 156,534,758 137,105,481 Egypt 20,000 20,000 Estonia 308,911 308,911 Finland 10,352,571 10,352,571 France 22,986,067 22,915,709 Germany 209,046,062 169,376,106 Greece 44,867 44,867 Holy See 20,000 20,000 Iceland 315,039 315,039 India 5,000,000 5,000,000 Indonesia 200,000 200,000 Ireland 8,933,341 8,933,341 Italy 17,689,912 16,431,612 Japan 33,081,492 31,247,752 Jordan 7,392,615 7,392,615 Kazakhstan 100,000 100,000 Republic of Korea 1,164,611 1,164,611 Latvia 20,812 20,812 Lebanon 224,931 224,931 Liechtenstein 103,093 103,093 Lithuania 54,289 54,289 Luxembourg 5,572,075 5,572,075 Malaysia 120,000 120,000 Malta 83,910 83,910 Mexico 750,000 0 Monaco 609,007 322,269 Netherlands 22,130,814 21,738,460 New Zealand 595,300 595,300 Norway 27,882,558 27,871,193 Oman 432,637 432,637 Pakistan 13,690 13,690 Palestine 4,186,174 4,186,174 Poland 792,645 792,645 Portugal 79,737 20,000 Qatar 8,000,000 8,000,000 Romania 44,300 44,300 Russia 2,000,000 2,000,000 Saudi Arabia 28,933,333 28,933,333 Slovenia 54,289
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency Response Plan As of 10 August 2010
    SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN INTER-AGENCY COMMON HUMANTIARIAN ACTION PLANS ACF GOAL MACCA TEARFUND ACTED GTZ Malteser Terre des Hommes ADRA Handicap International Medair UNAIDS Afghanaid HELP Mercy Corps UNDP AVSI HelpAge International MERLIN UNDSS CARE Humedica NPA UNESCO CARITAS IMC NRC UNFPA CONCERN INTERSOS OCHA UN-HABITAT COOPI IOM OHCHR UNHCR CRS IRC OXFAM UNICEF CWS IRIN Première Urgence WFP DRC Islamic Relief Worldwide Save the Children WHO FAO LWF Solidarités World Vision International 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Table I. Summary of Requirements – By Cluster ................................................................................... 4 2. CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES.................................................................................... 5 2.1 CONTEXT AND RESPONSE TO DATE.............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 FUNDING TO DATE...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES AND NEEDS ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 8 2.4 SCENARIOS ............................................................................................................................................. 10 3. COMMON HUMANTIARIAN ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]