The Education Equality Task Force in Its Speech from the Throne on May 9, 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Education Equality Task Force in Its Speech from the Throne on May 9, 2002 Education Equality December 10, 2002 Task Force P.O. BOX 22 The Honourable Elizabeth Witmer 77 Wellesley Street West Minister of Education Toronto, Ontario M7A 1N3 Tel (800) 438-6440 (416) 325-6009 Fax (416) 212-1037 Dear Minister, Le Groupe d’étude sur l’égalité en I am pleased to present the report of the Education Equality Task matière d’éducation Force, Investing in Public Education: Advancing the Goal of Continuous Improvement in Student Learning and Achievement. C.P. 22 77, rue Wellesley Ouest Toronto (Ontario) Thank you for giving me an opportunity to serve the people of M7A 1N3 Ontario by conducting this review of the Province’s education funding Tél. : 800 438-6440 formula. Thank you also for your support and encouragement 416 325-6009 throughout the course of my work. Téléc. : 416 212-1037 Sincerely, Mordechai Rozanski Dr. Mordechai Rozanski I Contents Preface . 3 1. Task Force Mandate and Process . 5 Mandate . 5 Expert Advisers . 5 Stakeholder Advisory Committee . 6 Research and Consultation Process . 6 2. Education Funding in Ontario . 9 Background . 9 Student-Focused Funding: The Current Formula . 11 3. Context for Considering the Issues and Making Recommendations . 14 Roles and Responsibilities in Ontario’s Education System . 14 Guiding Principles for the Funding Formula . 17 4. Issues and Recommendations . 21 Introductory Comments . 21 Benchmarks . 23 Effectiveness of the Formula for Distributing Funds among Boards . 25 Boards’ Flexibility with Respect to Local Expenditures . 38 School Renewal (Pupil Accommodation) . 40 Special Education . 43 Student Transportation . 48 Teachers’ Qualifications and Experience . 50 Technology . 51 Governance . 53 5. List of Recommendations and Summary of Estimated Costs . 54 List of Recommendations . 54 Summary of Estimated Costs . 59 Notes . 60 Appendices A. Task Force Chair and Expert Advisers . 63 B. Stakeholder Advisory Committee . 64 C. Discussion Points to Frame the Research and Consultation Process . 66 D. Components of the Student-Focused Funding Formula . 69 E. Participants in Roundtable Discussions . 74 F. Participants in Meetings with Provincial Stakeholder Associations . 81 G. Individuals and Organizations That Made Presentations and/or Provided Written Submissions . 85 H. Approach Used to Estimate the Cost of Updating the Benchmarks . 95 I. Estimated Cost of Updating Benchmarks and Proposed New Investments – by Grant . 97 J. Estimated Cost of Updating Benchmarks – by Benchmark . 99 Select Bibliography . 104 2 Investing in Public Education Preface The government announced the Education Equality Task Force in its Speech from the Throne on May 9, 2002. I was appointed to review the province’s student- focused funding formula and to make recommendations on ways to improve equity, fairness, certainty, and stability in the funding of Ontario’s students and schools. Since my appointment, I have considered this review an opportunity to affirm and strengthen Ontario’s publicly supported education system by advancing its goal – continuous improvement in student learning and achievement. Since the funding formula is one of the instruments for advancing this goal, my report focuses on improving the formula so that it provides school boards and schools with the means to achieve our education objectives. The journey from my appointment in May to the publication of this report has been a rewarding and enlightening one for me. More than anything, I have been impressed by the intense desire for high-quality public education among all education stakeholders in Ontario’s widely varied communities. I have not made this journey alone. My understanding of public education and its goals has been greatly enhanced by conversations with, and by reading the work of, several important education “thinkers” and “practitioners,” including internationally respected researchers and former ministers and deputy ministers of education. I received thoughtful advice on the issues in my mandate from a panel of expert advisers, all of whom have a broad level of expertise acquired through long careers in Ontario’s education system, and from a Stakeholder Advisory Committee made up of representatives of Ontario’s major education stakeholders. Chapter 1 and Appendices A and B provide more information on these advisers. I also received hundreds of oral and written submissions on a wide range of education and education funding issues from individuals, school boards, and education and other organizations during roundtable discussions and in public consultations throughout the province. Since students are, after all, the focus of Ontario’s education funding formula and this report, I am grateful that I was able, while conducting public hearings around the province, to visit some of Ontario’s schools and to meet students and their teachers and principals. The views of all of these people were most helpful as I deliberated the issues and wrote my report. Report of the Education Equality Task Force – 2002 3 This report could not have been produced without the dedicated assistance of a key group of support staff and consultants: • The task force’s highly efficient project co-ordinator, Norm Forma, quickly assembled a top-notch task force staff, engaged key consultants, arranged a wide-ranging consultation process in a very short period of time, responded quickly to all my needs, and kept me firmly on track. • Enid Slack, an economic consultant with an impressive track record as a member of an Education Funding Review Panel in British Columbia and of David Crombie’s Who Does What Panel for the Ontario government, provided sensitive and practical advice on a wide range of issues. • Ken Snowdon, who most recently served as Vice-President, Policy and Analysis, at the Council of Ontario Universities and who has years of experience with funding formulas, cost analyses, and research into higher education issues, conducted important research and advised me on many of the issues. • Pat Tolmie, who has edited many education task force reports, including sev- eral for the Education Improvement Commission, offered valuable editorial advice and guidance in the crafting of this report. I want to thank the following staff of the Ministry of Education: Suzanne Herbert, Deputy Minister; Norbert Hartmann, Assistant Deputy Minister for Special Pro- jects; Judith Wright, Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Planning and Programs; and Peter Gooch, Drew Nameth, Allan Doheny, and Wayne Burtnyk of the Ele- mentary/Secondary Business and Finance Division. Finally, I would like to thank the Honourable Elizabeth Witmer, Minister of Education, for her support and for encouraging me to offer candid advice on ways to improve Ontario’s education funding formula. Mordechai Rozanski Guelph, Ontario November 28, 2002 4 Investing in Public Education 1.Task Force Mandate and Process Mandate As I noted in my “Preface,” the Education Equality Task Force was announced in the Speech from the Throne on May 9, 2002. The government appointed me to review the province’s education funding formula and to make recommendations, to be considered for the 2003–04 school year, on ways to improve equity, fairness, certainty, and stability in the funding of Ontario’s students and schools. I was asked to review six aspects of the funding formula: 1. the effectiveness of the model for distributing funding between different types of boards (for example, between urban and rural boards, between small and large boards) 2. the structure of cost benchmarks (for example, does per pupil funding reflect appropriate per pupil costs?) 3. the degree of local expenditure flexibility school boards should have 4. approaches to addressing school renewal (for example, maintenance, repairs, renovations) 5. whether the current approach to funding special education is the most responsive way to meet students’ needs 6. the approach to funding student transportation, including ways to maximize opportunities for shared busing services between school boards that serve the same communities In addition, I was asked to ensure that my recommendations: • promote the principles on which the funding mechanism was built, which include fairness, equity, responsiveness to learners’ needs, and accountability • improve the stability of the education system • respect the legislative and constitutional framework for education in Ontario, which includes public, Catholic, French-language, and English-language school boards • take into account the fiscal situation of the Province Expert Advisers I was assisted in my work by a five-member team of independent expert advisers: Ann Vanstone, Patrick Slack, Lynn Beyak, Brian Cain, and Mariette Carrier-Fraser. Their biographies appear in Appendix A, as does mine. Report of the Education Equality Task Force – 2002 5 Each of these experts possesses broad experience acquired during a career of service in Ontario’s education system. Together they have served as a key resource, working directly with me as I met with stakeholders and the public, reviewed research and submissions, and developed my recommendations. All of the advisers are independent volunteers not currently employed in the education sector. Stakeholder Advisory Committee I was also assisted by a 31-member Stakeholder Advisory Committee. This committee was composed of representatives from major education-related organizations, including those representing parents, students, teachers, principals, trustees, directors of education, and school board supervisory officials. Their names and affiliations can
Recommended publications
  • V119-1985To1986-331.Pdf
    I LyJL^JJLK p <4- Ontario JOURNALS OF THE Legislative Assembly OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO From 4th of June to 18th of June 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 2nd of July to 12th of July 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 15th of October to 20th of December 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 6th of January to 12th of February 1986 Both Days Inclusive IN THE THIRTY-FOURTH AND THIRTY-FIFTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY QUEEN ELIZABETH II BEING THE First Session of the Thirty-Third Parliament of Ontario SESSION 1985-86 VOL. CXIX INDEX Journals of the Legislative Assembly, Ontario 34-35 ELIZABETH II, 1985-86 1st Session Thirty-Third Parliament DJOURNMENT DEBATES: July 9 (two matters), July 11, November 5 (two matters), December 5 (two matters), December 10 (two matters), December 12 (two matters), Decem- ber 19, January 7, 21 , 23, 28. Aexander, Honourable Lincoln: Appointment as Lieutenant Governor remarks on, (Oct. 15), 71. gOARD OF INTERNAL ECONOMY: Order-in-Council re membership of, (June 7, July 5, Oct. 28, Dec. 9), 26. 46. 92, 144. Budget Debate: 1. Motion for approval, (Oct. 24), 87. Carried, (Feb. 12), 232. Amendment moved, (Oct. 25), 90. Lost, (Feb. 12), 231. 2. Dates debated October 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, November 1 , 4, February 12. By-Election: Warrant for issued, (Oct. 15), 71. fiiil iv index 1985-86 1 ABINET OFFICE ESTIMATES: Cabinet Office Programme. Deemed reported and concurred in (Feb. 12), 221. Francophone Affairs Programme see Francophone Affairs. Commission on Redistribution: Debate on the motion for Consideration of Objections to the Report of (July 5, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Informer
    Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF FORMER PARLIMENTARIANS SUMMER 2017 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. SUMMER 2017 Table Of Contents Interview: Leona Dombrowsky Page 3 Interview: Steve Mahoney Page 5 Obituary: Gerry Martiniuk Page 8 AGM Recap Page 10 Hugh O’Neil Frienship Garden Page 11 Interview: Bill Murdoch Page 13 Interview: Phil Gillies Page 16 Interview: Sharon Murdock Page 19 Interview: Rolando P. Vera Rodas Page 21 Ceremonial Flag Raising Area Page 23 Margaret Campbell Page 24 Tributes Page 26 Contact Us Page 27 2 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. Interview: Leona Dombrowsky M. P. P. Liberal, Cabinet Minister Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington 1999-2007 Prince Edward-Hastings 2007-2011 “It is critical to have an understanding that everything we do has an impact, either positive or negative on the environment.” Leona Dombrowsky’s interest in politics started with dinner table talk when she was young. While her parents were not involved in partisan politics, they were always interested in the issues of the day and hence Leona, growing up in the French Settlement north of Tweed, developed an interest in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislators and Legislatures of Ontario : a Reference Guide
    Msktor^s Ijegisl/itivcUkmy isktors a ofOntum a tvfenmceguide n/oCume 4/1984-1991 dt m m. Ontario Le^sktiveL3mt Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Forman, Debra, 1956- Legislators and legislatures of Ontario 4. 1984-1991. Contents: v. 1. 1792-1866. - v. 2. 1867-1929. ~ v. 3. 1930-1984. - v. - 0-7743- ISBN 0-7743-9021-2 (set). - 0-7743-9022-0 (v. 1). - 0-7743-9023-9 (v. 2). 9024-7 (v. 3). - 0-7729-9328-9 (v. 4). 3. 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly-History. 2. Ontario-Politics and government. Legislators-Ontario-History. I. Ontario. Legislative Library. II. Title. JL273.F6 1984 328.713'09 84-093008-9 1 1 Contents Foreword v Introduction vii Errata viii General Elections 1984-1991 1 Presidentsof the Executive Council 1984-1991 2 Alphabetical Index of Members 1792- 1991 3-27 Executive CouncUs of Ontario 1 984- 1 99 29-5 Death Notices Former Ontario MPPs 1984-1991 53-54 32nd Legislature 55-87 33rd Legislature 88-109 34th Legislature 110-181 35th Legislature 182-201 ® IV Foreword Approximately 5,200 men and women have served as Members of the House of Assembly of the Province of Upper Canada (1792-1841), as Members from Canada West in the Legislative Assembly of the united Province of Canada (1841-1867), and as Members of the legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario (1867-1991). In the past, identification or verification of a particular Member, Legislature or Electoral District has proved to be a tedious and time-consuming task for those researching Ontario's political history because the information is scattered in a great many sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from a Massive Climate Achievement
    ONTARIO CLEAN AIR ALLIANCE RESEARCH Lessons learned from a massive climate achievement by Brad Cundiff April 2015 160 John Street Suite 300 Toronto, Ontario M5V 2E5 Phone: 416-260-2080 [email protected] ONTARIO CLEAN AIR cleanairalliance.org ALLIANCE RESEARCH Special thanks to the Ivey Foundation and the Metcalf Foundation for their generous financial support. Report distribution partner: Ontario’s Coal Phase Out: Lessons learned from a massive climate achievement ©2015 Ontario Clean Air Alliance Research Author: Brad Cundiff, Green Living Communications Cover photograph: Demolition of Lakeview coal plant by Toronto Star Preface When we started the campaign to get rid of dirty coal, few thought we would succeed. Eliminating coal use meant getting the province’s giant electric utility to abandon a source of cheap, albeit highly polluting, energy. It meant convincing political leaders that Ontario could make the transition to cleaner electricity sources without the lights going out and bills soaring. And it meant massively increasing public understanding of the threat posed by coal, its role in the province’s electricity system, and cleaner alternatives. Coal’s oversized pollution footprint, however, also made it a huge opportunity to drive massive improvements in air quality and to make major progress in reducing climate destabilizing emissions. The task, then, was to tell an effective story about what could be gained by shifting away from coal and how we could keep the lights on without it. Our success in doing that was thanks to efforts of many people and organizations who believed in our vision of a coal-free Ontario. I would particularly like to thank the Ontario Medical Association and the Toronto Public Health, especially the late Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wed 31 May 2000 / Mer 31 Mai 2000
    No. 64 No 64 ISSN 1180-2987 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario First Session, 37th Parliament Première session, 37e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Wednesday 31 May 2000 Mercredi 31 mai 2000 Speaker Président Honourable Gary Carr L’honorable Gary Carr Clerk Greffier Claude L. DesRosiers Claude L. DesRosiers Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Copies of Hansard Exemplaires du Journal Information regarding purchase of copies of Hansard may Pour des exemplaires, veuillez prendre contact avec be obtained from Publications Ontario, Management Board Publications Ontario, Secrétariat du Conseil de gestion, Secretariat, 50 Grosvenor Street, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 50 rue Grosvenor, Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1N8. Par 1N8. Phone 416-326-5310, 326-5311 or toll-free téléphone : 416-326-5310, 326-5311, ou sans frais : 1-800-668-9938.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety in Ontario
    CA6 •• pca ... • N22 V.3 1994 A BLUEPRINT FOR JUSTICE and COMMUNITY SAFETY IN ONTARIO NEW DIRECTIONS NEW DIRECTIONS A BLUEPRINT FOR JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY SAFETY IN ONTARIO Mike Harris Leader Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 A Message from Mike Harris 3 About Our Task Force 5 The Agenda (including Highlights) 7 Root Causes of Crime Societal Problems Violence in the Media Drugs 11 The Public's Role Parental Responsibility Personal Responsibility 13 Education Violence in Schools Educating Against Crime 15 Community Involvement Community Action Safe Neighbourhoods 17 Crimes Against the Person Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Child Sexual Abuse Elder Abuse ENSURING JUSTICE 21 Young Offenders The Young Offenders Act Sentencing of Young Offenders 23 Sentencing Sentencing Guidelines Conditional Release 25 Bail and Parole 26 Court Management 26 Martin Report 27 Diversion 27 Police Staff Levels Other Support 29 Dangerous Offenders 30 Psychiatric Facilities RESPECTING VICTIMS' RIGHTS 33 The Victims' Bill of Rights 34 Victim Assistance Committee 34 Victims'Input 35 Coroners' Inquests CONCLUSION READER'S RESPONSE FORM A MESSAGE FROM MIKE HARRIS On the inside cover of this blueprint is a list of names. Some are experts Every person in Ontario is on crime prevention, others are victims of crime. Some are representatives of entitled to security of their community safety organizations, others are independent citizens. person, property and family. What all of these people have in common is that their concern about issues involving crime, justice and community safety brought them to one of our public meetings to speak out. In preparing this document, the Ontario P.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 633058129179308750 Christop
    By Christopher Twardawa [email protected] To be presented to the Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform January 2007 Version ONE-070.131 www.ctess.ca www.TwardawaModel.org Any opinion or view presented in the document is that of and only of the author, Christopher Twardawa, and may not necessarily reflect those of any organization he is or has been associated with. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part is permitted, provided the source (Christopher Twardawa and www.ctess.ca or www.TwardawaModel.org ) is fully acknowledged. © Christopher Twardawa, 2007 TwardawaModel.org CTESS.ca Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. Christopher Twardawa Electoral System Solution ii TwardawaModel.org CTESS.ca About CTESS The Christopher Twardawa Electoral System Solution (CTESS) is the creation of its author – Christopher Twardawa and is designed to provide a better electoral system than what Canada and its provinces now have. With the belief that the current system is good but requires improvements, CTESS strengthens it by identifying deficiencies and proposing innovations. Unlike any other electoral system currently in use and which all have tradeoffs, CTESS has no tradeoffs and therefore eliminates the need to change electoral systems as a whole. Christopher first started thinking about this after the 1993 Canadian federal elections, since the results of those elections appeared to him to be inconsistent with how the voters voted. Ten years later in 2003, while still in university, he came up with the current model (the Twardawa Model) which is a simple yet considerate and sophisticated model. It can be applied to any democratic state under the Westminster model of government and similar systems.
    [Show full text]
  • House Master Template
    No. 25 No 25 ISSN 1180-2987 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario Fourth Session, 37th Parliament Quatrième session, 37e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Thursday 12 June 2003 Jeudi 12 juin 2003 Speaker Président Honourable Gary Carr L’honorable Gary Carr Clerk Greffier Claude L. DesRosiers Claude L. DesRosiers Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Copies of Hansard Exemplaires du Journal Information regarding purchase of copies of Hansard may Pour des exemplaires, veuillez prendre contact avec be obtained from Publications Ontario, Management Board Publications Ontario, Secrétariat du Conseil de gestion, Secretariat, 50 Grosvenor Street, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 50 rue Grosvenor, Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1N8. Par 1N8. Phone 416-326-5310, 326-5311 or toll-free téléphone : 416-326-5310, 326-5311, ou sans frais : 1-800-668-9938.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province Of
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, 1997-98 35 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Hon. Noble A. Villeneuve DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE Voted Salaries and Wages ($41,800,393) Temporary Help Services ($491,422): Accounts under $50,000—491,422. Note: Recoveries from Other Ministries and Activities ($240,000): AGRICORP, 240,000. Employee Benefits ($15,064,661) Payments for: Canada Pension Plan, 907,132; Dental Plan, 538,450; Employer Health Tax, 869,668; Employment Insurance, 1 ,285,499; Group Life Insurance, 87,704; Long Term Income Protection, 6 1 1 ,240; Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Plan/Public Service Pension Plan, 2,8 1 4,066; Supplementary Health and Hospital Plan, 638,391; Unfunded Liability - Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Plan/Public Service Pension Plan, 3,132,563. Other Benefits: Attendance Gratuities, 205,861; Maternity/Parental/Adoption Leave Allowances, 490,340; Severance Pay, 2,699,729; Miscellaneous Benefits, 358,429; Accounts under $50,000—65,216. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 360,373. Note: Recoveries from Other Ministries and Activities, 358,809. Travelling Expenses ($2,422,395) Hon. Noble A. Villeneuve, 9,722; Frank Ingratta, 1 1 ,588; K. Knox, 9,634; W. Allen, 20,809; D. K. Alles, 1 1,196; P. M. Angus, 23,582; M. E. Appleby, 10,811; S. Banks, 10,957; J. R. Bird, 15,637; D. J. Clarke, 10,636; J. C. Clarke, 14,672; J. L. Cushing, 20,704; J. R. Dalrymple, 17,607; C. R. Duelow, 15,494; R. J. Dunlop, 11,611; R. E. Forrest, 17,367; I. G. Giddings, 12,552; P.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Selection As Strategic Dissent in the Ontario Legislature
    Weapons of the (Politically) Weak? Speaker Selection as Strategic Dissent in the Ontario Legislature Paper prepared for the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA) Annual Conference. Wilfrid Laurier University. Waterloo, Ontario. May 16-18, 2011. By Zac Spicer PhD Candidate [email protected] The University of Western Ontario and John L. Nater PhD Candidate [email protected] The University of Western Ontario Work in progress – do not cite without the permission of the authors Abstract: The majority of academic studies examining legislative dissent have focused on public acts of dissent – that is, legislators physically standing and voting against their party or criticizing them in the media. This is understandable, as nearly all votes in legislatures are public. However, there is a lone secret ballot vote conducted in legislatures: the vote to elect a Speaker. In this paper, we examine Speaker selection in Ontario and find that in the seven votes to select a Speaker since the Ontario legislature began using a secret ballot, the Premier has rarely seen his choice for Speaker elected. In four out of seven votes, their caucus has voted against them. We ask why this private act of dissent is more common than public acts of dissent, testing three factors identified as likely to increase dissent: party popularity, cabinet size and the percentage of new MPs entering the party at each legislative term. We find that individual level indicators best explain the paradox of private acts of dissent and that the Speaker selection process involves three groups of actors, each with their own preference order in decision-making: 1) the government backbench, 2) the Premier‘s Office, the Premier and Cabinet and 3) the opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals of the Legislative Assmbly of the Province of Ontario, 1987-1989, Being the First Session
    c/i 2. y 3-57 c. 9 REJ Ontario JOURNALS OF THE Legislative Assembly OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO From November 3rd, 1987 to January 7th, 1988 Both Days inclusive and from February 8th to February llth, 1988 Both Days inclusive and from April 5th to June 29th, 1988 Both Days inclusive and from October 17th, 1988 to March 2nd, 1989 Both Days inclusive BEING THE First Session of the Thirty-Fourth Parliament of Ontario SESSION 1987-88-89 IN THE THIRTY-SIXTH, THIRTY-SEVENTH AND THIRTY-EIGHTH YEARS OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY QUEEN ELIZABETH II VOL. CXXI INDEX Journals of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario 36-37-38 ELIZABETH II, 1987-88-89 - - First Session Thirty-fourth Parliament ADJOURNMENT DEBATES: November 17, 19, 24; December 8, 10, 1987; April 14, 1988; January 12, 1989. ARMENIAN EARTHQUAKE: Canadian and Ontario flags flown at half-mast in remembrance of those who lost their lives December 12, 1988. B BOARD OF INTERNAL ECONOMY: Order in Council appointing Chairman and Commissioners November 4, 1987. Order in Council deleting the name of one Commissioner and substituting the name of another in lieu thereof February 13, 1989. BUDGET DEBATE: Budget and Budget Papers, 1988 tabled April 20, 1988. Dates considered April 25, 26, 27, 28; May 4, 5, 9, 19, 30; June 2, 1988; Feb- ruary 22; March 2, 1989. [iii] iv INDEX 1987/88/89 Motion for approval April 25, 1988; carried on division March 2, 1989. Amendments to motion for approval April 26, 1988; lost on division- March 2, 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Dear All Former Members, Especially Recent Joiners of Our Special Group of Parliamentarians
    Summer 2019 Dear all Former Members, especially recent joiners of our special group of Parliamentarians. Our office is located at the Whitney Block, in room 1612. It is a good place to stop by, have coffee and put your feet up for a while. Office hours: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Tuesday to Friday. THE DOOR IS OPEN, COME SAY HELLO! COMFORTABLE FURNITURE & FRESH COFFEE. Give us a call first, 416-325-4647 just to make sure someone will be around to greet you. InFormer | Summer 2019 NOTICE Pg.4 Special Events: AGM & DSA Interview Dr. Bette Stephenson INTERVIEWS Pg.5 to 8 Margaret Marland Pg.9 to 13 Sophie Kiwala Pg.14 to 16 Wayne Lessard Pg.17 to 22 Louise Lebeau JUST IN Pg.23 OAFP YouTube account FEATURE Pg.24 to 26 Two Interns Explore Queen's Park YOUR ATTENTION, PLEASE! Pg.27 FAQ about your Travel Insurance A Special Birthday Announcement OBITUARIES Pg.28 to 29 Julia Munro Pg.30 to 31 Hugh Edighoffer Pg.32 to 33 Dr. Harry Parrott Pg.34 to 35 David Caplan NOTICE A Special Day in the Life of the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians Monday, October 28th, 2019 Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Distinguished Service Award Ceremony (DSA) This year's recipient of our DSA is: Dr. Bette M. Stephenson (MPP 1975-87) Details about this important day will be sent out later. Dr. Bette Stephenson Dr. Bette Stephenson broke down many gender barriers during her 12- year tenure in Ontario’s Parliament. She was the first woman to serve as Min- ister of Labour, Minister of Education, Minister of Colleges and Universities, as well as Chair of the Management Board, Treasurer, and Deputy Premier.
    [Show full text]