Livestock in Hawaii by L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Livestock in Hawaii by L UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII RESEA.RCH PUBLICATION No.5 A Survey of Livestock in Hawaii BY L. A. HENKE AUGUST, 1929 PubUshed by the University of Hawaii Honolulu • Ali TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Page Horses in Hawaii __ __ __ __ __ _...... 5 First horses to Hawaii _ __ _._._._ _._ ._ -- - ----.-............ 5 Too many horses in 1854 _.. __ __ ._ __ _. 5 Thoroughbred horse presented to Emperor of Japan.-_ _...... 6 Arabian horses imported in 1884 _.. _ _._ __ .. ____- --... 6 Horse racing in Honolulu fifty years ago -- .. -..- -.- ---..- -... 6 Horse racing at Waimanalo _._._ __ _._ ___.. _ '-'-" ..".""'-.' 6 Some men who fostered horse raising in early· days................................ 6 Some early famous horses _ _._ ___ _..... 6 Horner ranch importations _ __ __ .__ ____.. _.. '.".'_'.. ".""'."." 7 Ranches raising light horses __ --............. 8 Some winners at recent I-Iawaii fairs .. ___ _._................................. 8 I-Ieavy horses and nlules __ ___ _._ _................................ 8 Cattle in Hawaii ___-- _. __ .. _._................... 8 First cattle in Hawaii _ __ .. _ __ ._. ___- -.......... 8 First cattle were longhorns _ _._ _ __ ____ _..... 9 Angus cattle _ _. __ __..__ -.. _._ _._ .. __ _. 9 Ayrshire cattle.. -- __ ________.._ __ _._._._._........... 11 Brown Swiss cattle ___ __ _.. _____.. _..... 11 Devo,n cattle __ __ ___.. __ _ __ 11 Dexter cattle __ ___ _...................... 12 Dutch Belted cattle _ __ ._._ .. __ .. _ __ _................ 12 Hereford cattle .. __ __ __ __ _.............................. 12 Holsteil1 cattle --_____ __ 14 Shorthorn cattle --_____ _._ .. __ _____ 15 Sheep and Goats in I-Iawaii _ __ _._ ._ _ _._ _ 16 First sheep introduced __.. ___ __ 16 Report of l\1inister of Interior in 1845 ______ _._ _.. 16 Government sheep in 1845 _._ _ _ 16 Sheep situation in 1852 .. --_ _._ ___.. _.. __ 16 South Down sheep _._ __ _._ __ _ 17 Sheep ranch on Waimea Plains in 1856 _ __ _ 17 Saxon-lVlerino sheep introduced _______ 17 Merino sheep from Germany ._ ____ __ _.. _ 17 Gift of sheep from Emperor of France._ _.._ __ 17 Sheep to Niihau by British vessel __ __.. 18 Tunis sheep introduced -____ __ __ _.. 18 First goats to Hawaii ______..___ _.. 18 Swil1e in Hawaii _ -- -- -- -.- - 18 Go,vernmel1t hogs -- -- _. __ _ _....... 18 Hogs shipped to California in 1853 --_.. _._ 18 Berkshires in Hawaii in 1855 - -___ 19 iv'.. Page Government Cattle, Horses and Sheep . .. .. .. _ -'---". 19 Government sheep in 1845 .... ... _. ---_ ._._. __ .".. __ . 19 Cattle at Wailuku in 1845 . .. ._. .. .. .. __ .__ .__ . ... 19 Governtnent cattle at Waimea in 1847 . .. ._ .. .... .. 19 Offer of sale of cattle to Government in 1847 .... _. ..... _. __ .._.. __ .__ _._ .... 19 Care of Government cattle in 1848 . .. .. .__ .__ .. __ -.---- . 19 Use of Government horses requested . .. __ . .. _. .__ . .. .-.. 20 Request to purchase Government horses on Kauai . ._.. __ ..._... __ .. 20 Request to purchase Government cattle at Waimea ------- ._ .. _. .. __ .. 20 Sale of government cattle .._.. ... ... _. ._.. __ ..... ._ _.. _. __ ---. .._.. --._._ .. 20 Wild cattle rights leased in 1870 .. __ . .. ._. ....__ .. -._. .. 20 Mountain land leases much in demand .. .. .... .__ ... .. __ ._._._._ .. 20 Glimpses of Hawaii Cowboys, Ranches and Livestock Since 1793_ --.. 21 Wall to confine cattle built in Kona _ __ . ._. __ .. 21 Cowboys introduced .. __ .... .. ._. ...__ .._.._.. ._ .._.._..._.. 21 Longhorns on Oahu about 1840 .__ ._. __ .__ ._. .. __ ... ~--.--. __ .. 21 First beef exported .- ... _. .. __ . .. .. _..... .. .. .. _. .. 21 The grazing situation in 1851 ... .. ._. .. 22 Estimate of livestock in 1851 . .. .. ... ._ ... _. 22 Cattle industry of Hawaiian Islands in 1852 ._._ ._. .. .__ .._ 22 Cattle worth five dollars in 1853 __ __.. __ ._ _.. __ . ._. .. 23 Hawaiian beef for sale ._ .... __ .. __ ... .__ ...__ . .. _. ..._.... __ .__ 23 Bullock catchers .....-.- .. .... __ ._. ._. .. ... .... 23 Cattle hunting .-. .. ._._.. .. ... _. __ ._ .. __ -. __ .. __ . ..... .__ .__ .. .. 23 A cattle hunting camp . .. _. .__ .. _.. __ .. __ ._. .... __ .... .. ._. __ . .. .. 23 Longhorns on Kauai in 1860 . .. _. .. _._. .. .. .__ ._ ... 24 Tallow plant at Kawaihae . .- . ...._ _. ._ .. .__ .- .-.- ... _. 24 Many cattle on Oahu before annexation . .. __ ._. .... ... ._. __ . ._. 24 Livestock in Hawaii at different periods _._._. __ .. __ ... .. ... _.. __ . 24 Livestock exports from Hawaii before 1900 ._. ... _._ .. __ ..__ .. ._. 25 Cattle and sheep slaughtered in Honolulu ... __ .. __ . ._._ .. _. ._._._._._. .__ .... _. 25 Graziers' meeting in 1902 -.._.._ .. ._. __ ._ .. ..__ . ._. __ . 25 SECTION TW:O The Leading Beef Ranches -.. -- .. -.--... -----.-----.-- .. -.-------.---.- ..--.--.----.----. .. __ ._ .. _. ..... 26 Hawaii Greenwell Ranches .-.--------_.. -. __ ._._._ .. _. __ ..__ ._. .__ .. ._. __ ._ ..... .. _. 26 IIonokaa Sugar Company Ranch -.-.-- . .._.. .. .. ._ 27 Huehue Ranch .-... --..-.-.....-.--.-....-.. ----. ..__ .__ ._._._-.--.----... ------ __ . _. 28 Kaalualu Ranch ---.-.- .. -- .. -.-- .. -.- .. ---- ---.-_ .. _. __ ._--- --.-- ._. _.. 28 Kahua Ranch .-- ...-.. -.- .. --.- .. -.--.. -- .. -.-.---.. -.- .. -- -. __ .__ .__. .. .__ ._ 29 I(ahuku Ranch -.. -.- .. ----.- .. --------..-.-- -- .. ~ ..----.-.-..-----.---- ----- _ __ .__ .__ 30 Keauhou Ranch __ .. .. __ .__ . ... ..__ ..__ .__ ... __ -...- ---- ..-...__ .. _. 31 Keaau Ranch .. -.--- .. ---- ---.- --- ---.---.---.--.-.---- . .. .. __ .. _ _. 32 Kukaiatt Ranch -----.-- .. --- ..-.. --.-- .. -- ----------.. ---- ..---.----.---------.- __ .. __ .. .._ 33 l\1cWayne Ranch -- - --------.--.------------" __ ._ __ . .. __ .. _ -- ._. ._ 34 Olelomoana Ranch --.------- .. -.-----.-------- --- ... --.------.--.. --.--- .. _. __ _.. __ . 35 Kapapala Ranch -.--.-.-.---------.--.--- -- ..-.-.--.-.----. ..__ ..__ .__ __ .. 35 Parker Ranch .-- .. - -.-------.- ... -.. --------.--.- -------.. ----... .. .. ._._ .. 37 Puakea and Puuhue Ranches ....---------.-.---- ..... ---.- .. ---.-- -.-_._. ..__ ._. 40 Puu 00 Ranch .-.-----.. -.-.---.. -.. -.-----------. __.. .. __ -_. __ . ._ .. __ .. ... _.. 42 Puuwaawaa Ranch ---.--- ..-----.-------.--------_. __ ._. .. .. _---.-.-_._ ..... _. __ .. _. 43 Kahoolawe Kahoolawe Ranch ..-.. -.- -- - --.---- ..-..-.----.----.--- ----.--.--.-..- __ _ 44 v Page Kauai Grove Farm Company Cattle Ranch _ _. __ __ 45 Kekaha Sugar Company Ranch ~ 46 Kilauea Ranch _ __ _ 47 The Koloa .Sugar Company Ranch ._ _ 47 Lihue Plantation Ranch _.._...................................... 48 Makaweli Ranch __ __ 48 Princeville Plantation Company _.. __ 49 William Hyde Rice Ranch 50 Lanai Lanai Ranch __ _._._ __ 51 Molokai Hawaiian Homes Commission _ __ _.. __ _.. 52 J\10lokai Ranch _._ _ S2 Maui Gro·ve Ranch _ ~ _ 54 Hawaiian Commercial and Sugar Company Ranch and Dairy S5 Haleakala Ranch ._ .. __ . "._"_.. _'._'.' ..'.'..".."'" S6 Honolua Ranch .___ .__ 57 I(aonoula Ranch __ __ .__ 58 Pioneer Mill Company Ranch and Dairy _ __ _ S9 Ulupalakua Ranch . ._. __ ._ __.. __ __ _-_ __ 60 Niihau Niihau Ranch __ _. __ .. __ _ _ 60 Oahu I{aneohe Ranch _ _._._ 62 Oahu Railway and Land Company Ranches.. __ 63 Waianae Company Ranch _-__ ._ 64 SECTION THREE Beef Production in Hawaii Area, cattle marketed annually, etc. ._ _.. _ "" 66 Ratio between ranch area and cattle "'..' 66 Average weight and per cent of total cattle marketed annually 67 Dressed beef per acre per year ; 68 Dairying in Hawaii Dairy production data -..-- __ 70 Average production per cow - -.-.- - _ 71 Per capita milk consumption _ 72 Butter and cheese - 73 Disease among dairy cattle - -........................................................... 73 ~~r~~s i:n~a~~~~s a~tp~~~~~~\~~e ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~~ Sheep in Hawaii at present time -.. -.- ..- -- -- __ __ 75 Livestock in 1910 and 1920 --- -- - 77 Value of livestock in 1928 77 Value of livestock and livestock products produced in 1928 in Hawaii 77 Value of livestock and livestock products shipped to Hawaii in 1928 78 Animal products shipped from Hawaii, 1919-1928 78 Animals and animal products shipped to Hawaii, 1919-1928 79 IN1'RODUCTION Production of livestock has long been a big factor in the commercial and industrial life of the people of flawaii. 1~he livestock in the territory is conservatively valued at $11,600,000 at the present tin1e and the animals and animal products marketed by the ranchers and dairyn1en of Hawaii in 1928 were valued at about $5,250,000. The purpose of this investigation was to gather the outstanding facts concerning livestock in Hawaii from the time of the first introd1.Jctions to the present time. Published information on these points is meager and what little does exist is scattered through various publications of early days, of which only a few copies exist and these are not readily accessible to the public. This survey was started a year ago and during this titne the writer has had an opportunity to visit many of the leading ranches and ranchtnen in the territory and thus get n1uch first hand information from them which has never before been published. Without the cooperation of these tnen, some of whom are still engaged in ranching and others retired, the information presented here could not have been secured and I wish to express my great appreciation to them for their generous help. Their names appear scattered through the pages of this publication as managers or former n1anagers of ranches, or government officials of I-Iawaii. Practically all of the inforn1.ation pertaining to the period before 1860 "vas secured from the A.rchives of Hawaii, largely from letters in the files of the Interior Department of the Kingdom of Hawaii and news stories appearing in publications of that tillIe, chiefly "The Polynesian" and "The Adver­ tiser." I owe thanks to Mr. A. P. Taylor and his staff for their help in making this n1aterial available.
Recommended publications
  • Breed Relationships and Definition in British Cattle
    Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/hdy Breed relationships and definition in British cattle: a genetic analysis P Wiener, D Burton and JL Williams Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK The genetic diversity of eight British cattle breeds was not associated with geographical distribution. Analyses also quantified in this study. In all, 30 microsatellites from the FAO defined the cohesiveness or definition of the various breeds, panel of markers were used to characterise the DNA with Highland, Guernsey and Jersey as the best defined and samples from nearly 400 individuals. A variety of methods most distinctive of the breeds. were applied to analyse the data in order to look at diversity Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800566 within and between breeds. The relationships between Publishedonline25August2004 breeds were not highly resolved and breed clusters were Keywords: British cattle; breeds; diversity; microsatellites Introduction 1997; MacHugh et al, 1994, 1998; Kantanen et al, 2000; Arranz et al, 2001; Bjrnstad and Red 2001; Beja-Pereira The concept of cattle breeds, rather than local types, is et al, 2003). said to have originated in Britain under the influence of The goal of this study was to use microsatellite Robert Bakewell in the 18th century (Porter, 1991). It was markers to characterise diversity levels within, and during that period that intensive culling and inbreeding relationships between, a number of British cattle breeds, became widespread in order to achieve specific breeding most of which have not been characterised previously.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    the Practical Farmer A quarterly publication of Practical Farmers of Iowa Vol. 27, No. 1 | Winter 2012 Wyatt Wheeler hides in the hay at a pasture walk held at Jake and Amber Wheeler’s farm near Monroe this winter. In this issue How specialty crops can supplement farm income Savings Incentive Program: 25 new farmers embark on 2-year quest Field crops: Profit more by using less, without sacrificing yield Special 2012 PFI Annual Conference photo section Solar PV pays off for PFI members PFI Board of Directors We love to hear from you! Please feel free to contact your board members or PFI staff . Contents DISTRICT 1 (NORTHWEST) Gail Hickenbottom, Treasurer David Haden 810 Browns Woods Dr . Letter from the Director . 3 4458 Starling Ave . West Des Moines, IA 50265 Primghar, IA 51245 515 .256 .7876 712 .448 .2012 Horticulture . 4–5 highland33@tcaexpress .net ADVISORY BOARD Dan Wilson, PFI Vice-President Larry Kallem 2011 Beginning Farmer Retreat . .6–7 4375 Pierce Ave . 12303 NW 158th Ave . Paullina, IA 51046 Madrid, IA 50156 712 .448 .3870 515 .795 .2303 PFI Leaders . 8–9 the7wilsons@gmail .com Dick Thompson 2035 190th St . DISTRICT 2 (NORTH CENTRAL) Boone, IA 50036 Savings Incentive Program . .10–11 Sara Hanson 515 .432 .1560 2505 220th Ave . Field Crops . .12–13 Wesley, IA 50483 PFI STAFF 515 .928 .7690 dancingcarrot@yahoo .com For general information and staff Climate Change . 14–15. connections, call 515.232.5661. Tim Landgraf, PFI President Individual extensions are listed in 1465 120th St . 2012 PFI Annual Conference . 16-19 Kanawha, IA 50447 parentheses after each name.
    [Show full text]
  • Superior Germ Plasm in Dairy Herds
    Superior Germ Plasm in Dairy Herds By R. R. Graves^ Principal Specialist in Dairy Cattle Breedings and M. H. Fohrman^ Senior Dairy Hushandman^^ Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Feedingj and Management^ Bureau of Dairy Industry WITH more than 26 million dairy cows spread over the entire United States, a survey of herds for superior germ plasm is a tremendous undertaking. How the survey which is the subject of this article was conducted among agricultural experiment stations and the owners of more than a thousand commercial herds is described in later pages. It is sufficient at this point to say that no similar project on so large a scale had previously been attempted in this country. Hitherto the genetic study of dairy cattle has been restricted for the most part to analysis of the hereditary make-up of the individual sire or dam. Some attempts have been made in studies in the Bureau of Dairy Industry, and more recently by the Holstein-Friesian Association, to show the inheritance for production being built in some herds through the use of a number of sires. To analyze all the sires used in herds during the entire period of record keeping, however, and to show the female lines of descent and their relationship to the various sires in a large number of herds, is pioneer work in the field of animal breeding. In the present state of genetic knowledge relating to livestock, many might call it premature to attempt a survey of progress in breeding superior germ plasm in dairy-cattle herds in which records of production have been kept over a period of years.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 32013.Qxd 7/28/2017 3:06 PM Page 1
    Aug 3, 2017_Jan 32013.qxd 7/28/2017 3:06 PM Page 1 South Carolina MARKET BULLETIN South Carolina Department of Agriculture Volume 91 August 3, 2017 Number 15 Next Ad Deadline: August 8, 2017, Noon agriculture.sc.gov Market Bulletin Office: 803-734-2536 Seasonal Featured Products Hugh E. Weathers Commissioner South Carolina Photo by Jill Derrick State Farmers Market The Land family not only grow their own fruit, they also ferment it, distill it, bottle it, label it 3483 Charleston Hwy. and sell it at the Chattooga Belle Farm Distillery, which is one of the many facets of their farm. West Columbia, SC 29172 Advocates 803-737-4664 cantaloupes, peaches, squash, Chattooga Belle Farm: Paradise in the Upstate for Agriculture tomatoes, watermelons LONG CREEK--Chattooga Belle Farm’s of more caregivers, so Land is continuously Twelve years ago, an effort Greenville most valuable assets are intangible: the joy seeking more farm workers and creating jobs to establish a coalition of State Farmers Market 1354 Rutherford Rd. and commitment of the family who own it, the in the Upstate. industry organizations to Greenville, SC 29609 stunning views, and the diversity that keeps Land manages the farming, building, retail help market and promote 864-244-4023 people coming back to this paradise. and service divisions of the business. He says South Carolina products bedding plants, dairy products, When Ed Land decided in 2008 that it was when you are operating a business, it is beyond the normal scope flowers, peaches, watermelons time for a career change, he turned his eyes your job to be a part of every aspect of that of the Department was towards 138 acres of land in Oconee County.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Japanese American Internment Experience in Hawaii and Arkansas Caleb Kenji Watanabe University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2011 Islands and Swamps: A Comparison of the Japanese American Internment Experience in Hawaii and Arkansas Caleb Kenji Watanabe University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Asian American Studies Commons, Other History Commons, and the Public History Commons Recommended Citation Watanabe, Caleb Kenji, "Islands and Swamps: A Comparison of the Japanese American Internment Experience in Hawaii and Arkansas" (2011). Theses and Dissertations. 206. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/206 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ISLANDS AND SWAMPS: A COMPARISON OF THE JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT EXPERIENCE IN HAWAII AND ARKANSAS ISLANDS AND SWAMPS: A COMPARISON OF THE JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT EXPERIENCE IN HAWAII AND ARKANSAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Caleb Kenji Watanabe Arkansas Tech University Bachelor of Arts in History, 2009 December 2011 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT Comparing the Japanese American relocation centers of Arkansas and the camp systems of Hawaii shows that internment was not universally detrimental to those held within its confines. Internment in Hawaii was far more severe than it was in Arkansas. This claim is supported by both primary sources, derived mainly from oral interviews, and secondary sources made up of scholarly research that has been conducted on the topic since the events of Japanese American internment occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Global Brown Swiss Cattle Population Structure
    Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Characterization of the global Brown Swiss cattle population structure Worede Zinabu Gebremariam Examensarbete / Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Master’s Thesis, 30 HEC Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Erasmus Mundus Programme 407 – European Master in Animal Uppsala 2013 Breeding and Genetics Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Characterization of the global Brown Swiss cattle population structure Worede Zinabu Gebremariam Supervisors: Hossein Jorjani, SLU, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Examiner: Örjan Carlborg, SLU, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Credits: 30 HEC Course title: Degree project in Animal Science Course code: EX0556 Programme: Erasmus Mundus Programme - European Master in Animal Breeding and Genetics Level: Advanced, A2E Place of publication: Uppsala Year of publication: 2013 Name of series: Examensarbete / Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 407 On-line publication: http://epsilon.slu.se Key words: Inbreeding, population size, founder, ancestor, Brown Swiss Contents CONTENT LIST ................................................................................................... 0 ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………...2 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Fall ADCA Dexter Bulletin
    Regional Directors Aane.. ic a n Region I Missouri and Jllinoi. J ohn Knoche. RR # I, Box 214A, LaGrange, MO 63448 Dexte.. Cattle (573) 655-4152 knot:[email protected] Term Expires: 11/2003 Association Region 2 Oregon and Idaho Anna Poole, 13474 Agate Road, Eagle Point. OR 97524 26804 Ebenezel" (541) 826-3467 [email protected] Term Expjres: I 1/2003 Concol"dia, MO 64020 Region 3 Washington, British Columbia, Hawaii, and Alaska Mark Youngs, 19919 - 80th Avenue, N.E., Bothell, WA 98011 (206) 489-1492 Term Expires: 11/2003 2001 Officers Region 4 Colorado, Nebraska. Wyoming, and Utah President Carol Am1 Trayno1·, 749 24 3/4 Road, Grand Junction, CO g 1505 Patrick Mitchell (970) 241-2005 [email protected] Term Expires: 11/2003 7164 Barry Street Hudsonvill e. M l 49426 Region 5 Montana, Alberta, and Saskatchawan (616) 875-7494 Allyn Nelson, Box 2. Colinton, Alberta, Canada TOG ORO shamrockacres@ hotmai I .com (780) 675-9295 [email protected] Term Expires: I I /2003 Vice President Region 6 Kansas. Oklahoma. and Texas Kathleen Smith Marvin Johnson . P.O. Box 441. Elkhart. KS 67950 351 Lighthall Road (580) 696-4836 papnjohn @clkhart.com Term Expires: I 1/200 I Ft. Plain, NY 13339 (5 18) 993-2823 Region 7 lndiana, KenLucky. and Ohio Kesmith @telenct.nct Sta n Cass. 19338 Pigeon Roost Rd., Howard. OH 43028 (740) 599-2928 [email protected] Term Expires: 11/200 I Secretarv- Treasurer Rosemary Fleharty Region 8 Alabama. Arkansas. Georgia. Florida. Louisiana. Mississippi. N. Carolina. 26804 Ebenezer S. Carolina, and Tenne~see Concordia.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting and Managing Suspected Admixture and Genetic Drift in Domestic Livestock: Modern Dexter Cattle - a Case Study
    Detecting and managing suspected admixture and genetic drift in domestic livestock: modern Dexter cattle - a case study Timothy C Bray Cardiff University C a r d if f UNIVERSITY PRIFYSCOL C a e RDY|§> A dissertation submitted to Cardiff University in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UMI Number: U585124 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585124 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Table of Contents Page Number Abstract I Declaration II Acknowledgements III Table of Contents IV Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1. introduction 2 1.1. Molecular genetics in conservation 2 1.2. Population genetic diversity 3 1.2.1. Microsatellites 3 1.2.2. Within-population variability 4 1.2.3. Population bottlenecks 5 1.2.4. Population differentiation 6 1.3. Assignment of conservation value 8 1.4. Genetic admixture 10 1.4.1. Admixture affecting conservation 12 1.5. Quantification of admixture 13 1.5.1. Different methods of determining admixture proportions 14 1.5.1.1. Gene identities 16 1.5.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculture Classified List of Projects Agricultural Experiment Stations 1930
    j UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION No. 89 WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER, 1930 CLASSIFIED LIST OF PROJECTS OF THE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS 1930 COMPILED IN THE OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS For «ale by th« Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - Price 3S cent« U. s. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY—A. M. Hyde DIRECTOR OF SCIENTIFIC WORK—A. F. Woods OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS—^W. H. Evans, Acting Chief THE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS ALABAMA.—Auburn, M. J. Funchess, Director. ALASKA.—Sitka, H. W. Alberts, Director. ARIZONA.—Tucson, E. D. Ball, Director. ARKANSAS.—Fayetteville, Dan T. Gray, Director. CALIFORNIA.—Berkeley, C. B. Hutchison, Director. COLORADO.—Fort Collins, C. P. Gillette, Director. CONNECTICUT.—New Haven, W. L. Slate, Director; Storrs, W. L. Slate, Director. DELAWARE.—Newark, C. A. McCue, Director. FLORIDA.—Oainesville, Wilmon Newell, Director. GEORGIA.—Experiment, H. P. Stuckey, Director. GUAM.—Guam, C. W. Edwards, Director. HAWAII.—Honolulu, J. M. Westgate, Director. IDAHO.—Moscow, E. J. Iddings, Director. ILLINOIS.—Urbana, H. W. Mumford, Director. INDIANA.—La Fayette, J. H. Skinner, Director. IOWA.—Ames, C. F. Curtiss, Director. KANSAS.—Manhattan, L. E. Call, Director. KENTUCKY.—Lexington, T. P. Cooper, Director. LOUISIANA.—Baton Rouge, C. T. Dowell, Director. MAINE.—Orono, W. J. Morse, Director. MARYLAND.—College Park, H. J. Patterson, Director. MASSACHUSETTS.—Amherst, F. J. Sievers, Director. MICHIGAN.—East Lansing, V. R. Gardner, Director. MINNESOTA.—university Farm, 8t. Paul, W. C. Coffey, Director. MISSISSIPPI.—A. and M. College, W. R. Perkins, Director. MISSOURI.—Columbia, F. B. Mumford, Director. MONTANA.—Bozeman, F. B. Linfleld, Director. NEBRASKA.—Lincoln, W. W. Burr, Director. NEVADA.—Reno, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ayrshire Breed of Cattle
    64 65 Society's Ayr branch for lectures, recitals and small exhibitions. The top floor will be adapted as a caretaker's fiat and a kitchen, cloakroom, etc., will be accommodated in the wing. The Ayrshire Breed of Cattle. About £2,500 will be needed to complete the work of restoration, A Lecture to the Society on 10th March, 1949. and an appeal to the public for subscriptions was launched by the Saltire Society in December, 1948. Nothing but the subscription By Hugh Bone, Esq., of a sufficient sum now stands in the way of the restoration of this interesting building to a place in the life of AJT and a condition Lately Secretary of the Ayrshire Cattle Herd Book Society worth}' of its 400 j-ears of historj*. of Great Britain and Ireland. The origin and early historj' of the Ayrshire Breed of Cattle have been dealt with by many writers. I propose here to deal with the origin and development of the breed, and how the Ayrshire cow has been improved to its present high state of efficency as a. producer of high quality milk. Earty writers state that the original strain was imported from ADDITIONS to the BIBLIOGRAPHY of AYRSHIRE DURING 1949. abroad—Holland, Scandinavia, and even Spain being mentioned. In the case of the Dutch theory of origin, it is asserted that animals FERGUSSON (JAMES). " Lowland Lairds." FABER & FABER, 16/-. of the Teeswater or Holderness breed were introduced into AjTshire. These breeds were supposed to have derived their origin from a Much of Scotland's history has been made, and many of her cross with some large bulls imported from Holland into Yorkshire greatest national leaders bred, by a class which modern governments about 1700.
    [Show full text]