DOCSLIB.ORG

Property Portfolio Overview As of January 1 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Property Portfolio Overview as of January 1 2010 June 8 2010 Executive summary Total net sellable area(1) decreased by approximately 22% to 11.59MM square meters (14.89MM as of April 1 2009), of which 96% is represented by residential area; Total landbank decreased by 3.3MM sqm since last appraisal date due to contracted presales, divested non-core projects and partially abandoned projects; 13% decrease in market portfolio value to US$2.48bn (April 1 2009: US$2.86bn) due to changes in the following assumptions: – postponed launches of perspective projects, especially in Russia‟s regions (by two and more years); – conservative assumptions applied towards upward trend in selling prices and construction costs in subsequent periods (these are dependent upon underlying average oil price assumptions derived from forecasts of leading investment banks and agencies); – remaining incumbencies on existing projects, where apartments have been already presold; Market portfolio value per square meter increased to US$214 (April 1 2009: US$192). Discount rate on projects remained flattish (20% on average for properties in the course of development vs. 21% YoY; 27% on average for properties held for future development vs. 26% YoY), while at the same time Russian risk free rate significantly contracted over the period and CB rate also declined by 5.25ppt down to 7.75% YTD; Operational horizon at around 5 years in Moscow and Moscow region remains appropriate and safe. (1) unsold area 2 Portfolio overview 3 Landbank highlights as of January 1 2010 NSA (PIK Project portfolio summary (as Unsold area, Market value, share), Project portfolio split by geography of Jan 01 2010) '000 sqm US$MM '000 sqm Properties completed and partially 53 17 18 By Unsold area By Market Value sold Moscow Other Properties in the course of 6,383 3,793 1,511 regions development Other regions 12% 13% Properties planned for future 7,784 7,784 951 development Moscow Total PIK Group Portfolio as of 51% Region 55% 14,220 11,594 2,480 37% 32% Jan 01 2010 Moscow Note: Based on current land bank; assuming no additional land acquisitions going forward, excluding potential construction services Region Moscow Total: 11 594 (‘000 sqm) Total: $2 480 MM Source: CBRE Portfolio dynamic over time by geography (market Portfolio dynamic over time value per sqm, US$) 3 215 16 14.9MM sqm 1 200 1 829 14.2MM sqm -22% $1,000/sqm 14 1 000 $865/sqm 11.6MM sqm 12 800 10 $865/sqm 8.8MM sqm 1 024 942 971 8 $2.9bn 600 886 $8.8bn $12.3bn $2.9bn $2.5bn 6 $8.8bn $12.3bn 400 473 (MM sqm) (MM 4 $8.8bn $192/sqm$214/sqm 200 303 2 223 $192/sqm 186 0 0 56 53 Jan 01 2007 Jan 01 2008 Apr 01 2009 Jan 01 2010 Jan 01 2007 Jan 01 2008 Apr 01 2009 Jan 01 2010 Land bank (MM sqm) Market value per sqm Moscow Moscow region Other regions Source: CBRE Source: CBRE 4 CBRE valuation highlights Valuation Report as of April 01 2009 Valuation Report as of January 01 2010 RUB exchange rate: 33.9032 RUB/USD RUB exchange rate: 30.1851 RUB/USD Price growth estimates: Price growth estimates Price growth estimates: Price growth estimates 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ Moscow 0% 6.4% 10.9% 9.2% 0% Moscow 0% 0% 10% 8% 3% 0% Moscow Region 0% 4.2% 10.8% 9.9% 0% Moscow Region 0% 0% 9% 7% 2% 0% Rostov Region 0% 0.6% 10.5% 9.8% 0% Rostov Region 0% 0% 14% 12% 5% 0% Kaliningrad Region 0% 3.0% 9.0% 8.1% 0% Kaliningrad Region 0% 0% 14% 12% 5% 0% Kaluga Region 0% 5.9% 11.3% 8.2% 0% Kaluga Region 0% 0% 10% 8% 5% 0% Krasnodar Area 0% 7.0% 8.9% 7.5% 0% Krasnodar Area 0% 0% 10% 7% 4% 0% Omsk Region 0% 2.3% 8.3% 6.5% 0% Omsk Region 0% 0% 12% 10% 3% 0% Permsky Area 0% 8.7% 9.2% 7.4% 0% Permsky Area 0% 0% 12% 7% 3% 0% St. Petersburg 0% 5.0% 11.2% 10.2% 0% St. Petersburg 0% 0% 15% 12% 4% 0% Udmurt Republic 0% 6.3% 8.9% 6.4% 0% Yaroslavl Region 0% 0% 12% 8% 1% 0% Nizhny Novgorod Region 0% 6.3% 9.4% 6.5% 0% Yaroslavl Region 0% 13.3% 8.9% 6.2% 0% Construction cost growth estimates: Construction cost growth estimates: Construction cost growth estimates Construction cost growth estimates 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ Moscow 0% 4.2% 7.2% 6.1% 0% Moscow 0% 0% 8% 6% 1% 0% Moscow Region 0% 3.0% 7.6% 7.0% 0% Moscow Region 0% 0% 7% 5% 0% 0% Rostov Region 0% 0.0% 7.0% 6.4% 0% Rostov Region 0% 0% 11% 9% 2% 0% Kaliningrad Region 0% 2.5% 7.5% 6.8% 0% Kaluga Region 0% 3.8% 7.3% 5.3% 0% Kaliningrad Region 0% 0% 10% 8% 1% 0% Krasnodar Area 0% 5.2% 6.6% 5.6% 0% Kaluga Region 0% 0% 6% 4% 1% 0% Omsk Region 0% 1.9% 6.8% 5.3% 0% Krasnodar Area 0% 0% 7% 4% 1% 0% Permsky Area 0% 7.1% 7.6% 5.8% 0% Omsk Region 0% 0% 10% 8% 1% 0% St. Petersburg 0% 2.0% 8.1% 7.1% 0% Permsky Area 0% 0% 8% 4% 1% 0% Udmurt Republic 0% 4.2% 5.9% 4.2% 0% St. Petersburg 0% 0% 10% 8% 0% 0% Nizhny Novgorod Region 0% 5.5% 8.2% 5.7% 0% Yaroslavl Region 0% 0% 10% 6% 0% 0% Yaroslavl Region 0% 11.3% 7.6% 5.2% 0% Estimates of the financing terms for the properties construction: Estimates of the financing terms for the properties construction: – 70% debt (18% interest during, 14% after construction) – 60% debt (14% interest during, 12% after construction) – 30% equity – 40% equity Discount rate: Discount rate: – Average rate of 26% for properties held for future development (range 14-35%); – Average rate of 27% for properties held for future development (range 18-35%); – Average rate of 21% for properties in the course of development (range 12-35%). – Average rate of 20% for properties in the course of development (range 14-30%). Based upon sensitivity analysis conducted by CB Richard Ellis: - 1% decrease in the discount rate leads to an increase in portfolio value by 4.4%; - 2% decrease in the discount rate leads to an increase in portfolio value by 9.1%. Source: CBRE, Company data 5 Adjustments in project portfolio Unsold area, ‘000 sqm Total as of April 01 2009 14,894 (1) Non-core projects divested • Marine façade: 261 (1.8% of total) • North-Western Towers: 113 (0.8% of total) to settle debt: • Others: 10 (0.1% of total) 14,510 Adjusted by proportion of rights obtained (actually paid) Proportion, % Omsk, Rokossovskogo str. 40% 1,419 (9.6% of total) Projects considered to Yaroslavl, Dzerzhinskiy District 40% 167 (1.2% of total) partially abandon: Yaroslavl, Frunzenskiy District (Sokol) 40% 402 (2.7% of total) Nizhny Novgorod, Geroya Shnitnikova str 20% 190 (1.3% of total) Adjusted by proportion of rights retained after co-investment Rostov-on-Don, Schepkinskoe Field 50% 265 (1.8% of total) 12,067 Sqm sold: • 492 (3.3% of total)(2) 11,575 Others attributed to cumulative NSA changes • 19 (0.1% of total) in projects portfolio: Total as of January 01 2010 11,594 Note: (1) as % of total project portfolio as of April 1 2009 (2) audited IFRS results, Note 8 Source: CBRE, Company data 6 Top 15 projects account for 79% of value and 33% of unsold NSA Est. NSA, Unsold Market Market PIK share, Rating Project Phase Type Location completion ‘000 area, value, value, ‘000 sqm date sqm ‘000 sqm US$MM US$/ sqm Mitnaya, 13 (English High-end 70 48 357 1 (1) active construction Moscow 1Q2012 99 7,370 Town) Residential (1Q2012) (70) (63) (338) (5,326) Mass Market Moscow 1,134 650 311 2 (2) Khimki, Novokurkino active construction 4Q2014 1,135 478 Residential Region (4Q2014) (1,151) (680) (326) (480) 2Q2019 Mytischi, Yaroslavsky Mass Market Moscow 868 726 190 262 3 (4) active construction (1Q2019) 1,197 District Residential Region (788) (729) (166) (228) High-end 252 252 184 4 (3) Mantulinskaya 7 predevelopment Residential Moscow 4Q2021 252 729 (4Q2017) (260) (260) (172) (662) /Commercial Kommunarka, Leninsky Mass Market Moscow 1,023 1,023 158 5 (5) predevelopment, 1Q2027 1,055 155 Region Residential Region (4Q2020) (1,023) (1,023) (155) (152) High-end 4Q2017 165 163 150 6 (7) Moscow, Kuntsevo to be reactived Moscow 167 922 Residential (4Q2014) (165) (163) (112) (691) Khimki, Sovkhoznaya Mass Market Moscow 334 318 104 7 (13) active construction 4Q2016 411 328 str. Residential Region (4Q2013) (334) (334) (64) (193) Michurinsky pr-t., High-end Moscow 65 65 95 8 (12) predevelopment 4Q2013 65 1,464 district 5-6 Residential (1Q2012) (62) (62) (72) (1,169) Mass Market 139 139 82 9 (11) Perovskaya str., 66 predevelopment Moscow 1Q2016 139 589 Residential (2Q2015) (139) (139) (73) (523) High-end Kutuzovsky prospekt, 101 101 81 10 (10) predevelopment Residential, Moscow 2Q2017 101 799 14А (Park-City) (4Q2015) (101) (101) (76) (747) Commercial Marshala Zakharova str., Mass Market 68 68 51 11 (21) predevelopment Moscow 3Q2014 68 749 own.7 Residential (4Q2013) (78) (78) (33) (419) Varshavskoye highway, Mass Market 115 115 49 12 (27) predevelopment Moscow 4Q2019 115 426 own.141 Residential (3Q2015) (106) (106) (21) (194) Mass Market 43 43 48 13 (18) Mironovskaya str., 46 predevelopment Moscow 2Q2013 43 1,119 Residential (4Q2012) (43) (43) (40) (927) Ak.
Recommended publications
  • Street Retail Segment, a Number of Retail Sectors Kept Disappearing from the Traditional Tenant Pool

    Street Retail Segment, a Number of Retail Sectors Kept Disappearing from the Traditional Tenant Pool

    15 years on the Russian Retail Property Market RUSSIAN RETAIL PROPERTY MARKET REPORT 2013 HIGHLIGHTS Retail Property Market Report by MAGAZIN MAGAZINOV 2013 The year of 2013, especially the end of it, was marked by the lowered consumption rate among Russian consumers. Anticipation of a new crisis wave and negative predictions for the year of 2014 lead to a significant decrease in the consumer confidence index, shifting the focus of consumer behavior from buying to saving. Nevertheless, it is still too early to forecast negative trends for the market. There needs to be a more careful analysis of the trend data gathered in Q1–Q2 2014. In 2013 Moscow retail property market witnessed the unprecedentedly low amount of newly commissioned space with the unusually high amount of it planned for 2014. Provided that at least 50% of the space announced appears on the market in 2014, this will break the record of 2009. Last year Tashir Group of Companies became the most active developer on the capital's market with the two new shopping centers having become the largest openings of 2013. These amounted for 60% of the total GLA commissioned in 2013. Moscow retail property market demonstrates a clear cyclical pattern in the developer activity. Periods of recession - which usually last about 4 years - are followed by 1–2 years of active new retail space commission. Besides, for each new cycle the oscillatory amplitude grows larger. For example, after 4 years of stagnation and unprecedentedly low levels of new retail space development on the Moscow market (from 2005 till 2008), the next two years witnessed a burst of activity and record amounts of new retail space supply.
  • Become More Skillful Every Day. There Is No Limit to Perfection. Hagakure

    Become More Skillful Every Day. There Is No Limit to Perfection. Hagakure

    STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESS IN MOSCOW Become more skillful every day. There is no limit to perfection. Hagakure A PROPOS Robbie Williams was wrong when he referred to a Russian Today, these crimson jackets can only been businessman as “a modern Rasputin” in his famous hit found in museums. Modern Russian businessmen “Party Like a Russian.” But he’s not the only one to think have stopped wearing clothes that were popular so. A lot of businessmen abroad are convinced that doing among their predecessors in the 90s. Along with business in Russia is dangerous because anarchy and their appearance, their attitudes have changed lawlessness reign here. This is in spite of the fact that Russia as well. These days, Russian businessmen want keeps climbing up in the Doing Business rating, which is more than to make a lot of money. According to published every year by the World Bank. In just one year, one representative from the All-Russian Non- Russia jumped from 35th to 31st place. And keep in mind Governmental Organization of Small and Medium- that back in 2012, Russia was in 120th place! Unfortunately, Sized Business Opora Russia, a modern entrepreneur old habits die hard. As Karl Marx once pointed out, is, first and foremost, someone who is open to new “a person’s mind is the strongest fortress.” information. They have a different perspective on the world. Moreover, an entrepreneur's reputation Actually, the times when the first thing a foreign plays a much bigger role than it used to. Honesty and businessman did after coming to Russia was hire a reliability are valued, and partners who have stood bodyguard are long gone.
  • ON the ROAD City Moscow

    ON the ROAD City Moscow

    a a a s r Hotel Hilton i a y t k li s D vo o u M t o e l li k va a t y u u uc ry k o 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa e Ragout a a h p r k e a i y e h s e ulitsa Fadeeva t p s ga a v a s 4-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa ele p k p M D o y i s e 3 Sad r r a tsa ova k s e s uli p - naya Samotechnaya ulitsa ya NII Skoroy Pomoshchi a it ya tech Sadovaya -S s S u l 1-ya Brestskaya ulitsa ovaya Samo uk ’ kor Sad ha l p lo u 1 rev Sklifosovskogo e S Kazansky s t n k ulitsa Chayanova 1 ka y a ya p a az T u s T v lit y vokzal sa o h t e a i r K n l s lok h iy u k y s B ’ p a l - Kalanchevskaya ulitsa l a y reu eu e o e r 1 o r a p A. A. Chernikhov Design e Dokuchaev pereulok y 6 l iy e n B a Y y ’ u e s am h p and Architecture Studio l k z o u h r Sukharevskaya s O v k o s v k o y o a h y y K k a i h a u L c li r Ryazanskiy proezd ts a e n Novoryazanskaya ulitsa 1-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa s t a t la li n u a a iy o y l a K n Tsventoy bul’var u l’ p Sadovaya-Spasskaya ulitsa fa e m e r iu ultisa Petrovka r e a r e T p 52 k r Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya ulitsa 53 ya u n a a ulitsa Malaya Dmitrovka k v l iy o o e o lok v n l d reu ’ n pe k t Mayakovskaya eu Sa Maliy Karetniy l a e m r u s r 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa pe b S iy V n y y o a o r s n he o t ulitsa Mashi poryvaevoy z i t t l ru ni pereulok 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa etniy e O dniy Kar k u k Sad e v ereulo Orlikov pereulok o r arevskiy p Vasilyevskaya ulitsa S s kh Daev pereulok v T Bol’shoy Su 64 Ermitazh T o s Krasnovorotskiy proezd s v Mosproekt-2 k e i Tishinskaya ulitsa Yuliusa Fuchika y t p Pushkinskaya
  • Valuation Report PO-36/2017

    Valuation Report PO-36/2017

    Valuation Report PO-36/2017 A portfolio of real estate assets in Russia (St Petersburg, Moscow, Yekaterinburg) and Germany (Leipzig, Landshut, Munich) Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Ǩ, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Lyudmila Fradina, Tel. +7 812 3856106, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report Ň A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany Ň KF Ref: PO-36/2017 Ň Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Ň Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia and in Munich, Leipzig and Landshut, Germany. Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
  • Booklet En.Pdf

    Booklet En.Pdf

    ENGEOCOM’s significant contribution to the largest Moscow, Russian and international projects is a given fact… Hard work and creativity of thousands of employees are duly and highly rewarded; we are constantly moving up in our difficult and beloved business… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder METRO CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTION COMPLEX IN LOBNYA ROAD CONSTRUCTION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION AIRFIELD AND AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION HYDROTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION LICENSES, WARRANTS, CERTIFICATES TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 About the Company 14 Projects 19 Metro Construction 39 Production Complex in Lobnya 47 Road Construction 63 Civil Construction 93 Airfield and Airport Construction 103 Hydrotechnical Construction 109 Licenses, Warrants, Certificates Construction is a beautiful business because you leave things that will be used for years to come… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder ABOUT THE COMPANY ENGEOCOM Association JSC is one of Russia’s largest construction holdings. The company was established in 1989 and since its foundation has been focusing on design and development of the most challenging facilities. ENGEOCOM brand today encompasses operations of several enterprises with more than 6 thousand employees. Over 27 years, the holding has successfully implemented more than 250 projects in Russia and beyond. The company’s competitive advantage is the application of innovative technologies and tailor-made design solutions. The key areas of activity are metro construction, civil and road construction, and airfield construction. Over years, ENGEOCOM has succeeded in both keeping and significantly strengthening its positions on the Russian construction market. The association has turned into a multi-industry holding. The company has an extensive experience in carrying out major projects of development and refurbishment of transport infrastructure.
  • The Old Gets Older, and the New Grows Russian Proverb

    The Old Gets Older, and the New Grows Russian Proverb

    STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESS IN MOSCOW The old gets older, and the new grows Russian proverb A PROPOS It’s difficult to find a city in the world that’s developing as In other words, we don’t know what would have hap- quickly as Moscow right now. It seems that it’s changing for pened to Khrushchyovkas in the future had the brave and the better every 24 hours. Every day there is something new grandiose renovation program not been approved last year. in the Russian capital: a new metro station opens, a new Just think: after it’s complete, people who currently live in road is being built, a new cafe or concert hall… It’s almost 350,000 apartments will be relocated to new, comfortable, like no change comes as a surprise anymore. At least that’s environmentally friendly housing. what everybody thought until last summer — until Sergey But this program will entail more than just the construction Sobyanin approved the renovation program on August 1, of new homes. It will also create an appealing, high-quality 2017. According to the program, over 5,000 residential urban environment in the renovated districts. buildings will be demolished within the next fifteen years. This number is shocking, considering that in most countries The scope of the renovation program is so broad that it will demolishing just one building would be a problem. require investments that, according to various estimates, may amount to $50 billion. It’s not a small sum of money. The project concerns old residential buildings — the Can foreign investors invest in this program? This question is so-called “Khrushchyovkas.” The buildings got this name worth asking.
  • Valuation Report PO-20/2016

    Valuation Report PO-20/2016

    Valuation Report PO-20/2016 A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 10, 2017 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Б, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Maria Chernook, Tel. +7 812 3205654, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report │ A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia │ KF Ref: PO-20/2016 │ Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC │ Date of issue: March 10, 2017 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
  • Presentation of the Consolidated IFRS Results for 6 Months Ended June 30 2010 and Revaluation of Portfolio of Properties As of July 01 2010

    Presentation of the Consolidated IFRS Results for 6 Months Ended June 30 2010 and Revaluation of Portfolio of Properties As of July 01 2010

    Presentation of the consolidated IFRS results for 6 months ended June 30 2010 and revaluation of portfolio of properties as of July 01 2010 4 October 2010 Speakers: Andrey Rodionov, CFO Viktor Szalkay, IRO Content Title 1 Introduction 3 Sales & Marketing Update 6 Portfolio Overview 10 Financial Overview 15 Appendix 19 Top-15 Projects Overview 20 Disclaimer 30 2 Introduction 3 Proven execution in Russian real estate Key statistics 2007 2008 2009 1H09 1H10 Leading integrated homebuilder in Russia; Key operating indicators Focused on affordable residential housing Total housing completions ('000 sqm) (1) 1542 813 884 174 245 New sales contracts to customers (PIK share) 825 520 123 24 159 segment on Moscow Metropolitan market; ('000 sqm) (1) Transferred to customers (PIK share) ('000 sqm) (2) 992 378 492 110 152 Proven track record with over 10MM sq, meter completions (equivalent to over 170,000 units); Key financial indicators Consolidated Group revenue, US$MM (3) 2313 1355 1300 363 503 Founded in 1994, public since June 2007. Consolidated Group adjusted EBITDA, US$MM (3) 571 124 138 (13) (81) Note: 1. Management accounts 2. as per recognition criteria adopted under IFRS 3. 2007, 2008, 2009, 1H09, 1H10 P&L data was converted at 25.55, 24.86, 31.68, 33.05, 30.06 RUR/US$ exchange rates respectively Estimated market share in 2005-2010E (%) Volume of completed housing in 2000-2009 (sqm) 20% Russia Moscow Moscow Region PIK Group (thousand sq.m.) 16,0% 14,7% 15,0% 70 Russia (million sq.m.) 63,8 1800 16% 14,4% 61,0 59,8 1600 60 50,2 10,7% 11,3% 12% 1 542 1400 10,5% 13,9% 50 41,0 43,6 8,3% 1200 33,8 36,4 1 244 6,7% 40 31,7 1000 8% 8,7% 30,3 800 3,9% 4,3% 4,1% 30 884 3,1% 2,8% 827 813 600 4% 2,2% 20 400 2,9% 514 497 10 409 200 0% 261 0 167 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010E 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Note: market share is calculated as PIK completions divided by total completions in a specific region excluding individual housing Source: Rosstat, Company data construction.
  • Report and Valuation for Sistema Hals

    Report and Valuation for Sistema Hals

    REPORT AND VALUATION FOR SISTEMA HALS BOL. TATARSKAYA, 115184, MOSCOW RUSSIA OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: “THE MARGARITA PROPERTIES” 1ST JANUARY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE OF INSTRUCTIONS .............................................................................................................3 2. BASIS OF VALUATION......................................................................................................................4 3. TENURE AND TENANCIES ............................................................................................................4 4. NET ANNUAL RENT..........................................................................................................................5 5. TOWN PLANNING..............................................................................................................................6 6. STRUCTURE...........................................................................................................................................6 7. SITE AND CONTAMINATION .......................................................................................................7 8. PLANT AND MACHINERY...............................................................................................................7 9. INSPECTIONS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ..............................................................................7 10. GENERAL PRINCIPLES...................................................................................................................7 11. SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS,
  • Property Portfolio Overview As of July 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview As of July 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview as of July 1 2010 October 04 2010 Executive summary Total net selling area (1) decreased by approximately 7% to 10.76mln square meters (January 01 2010: 11.59mln sq meters), of which 97% is represented by residential area; Decrease of 832,000 sq meters was mainly due to: – pre-sales of approx. 159,000 sq meters (including retail sales of approx 94,000 sqm as reported on July 7 2010) for the first six months ended June 30 2010; – changed master plans for certain residential projects located in the Moscow metropolitan area for the total amount of approx. 383,000 net selling sq meters(2); – reduction of interest in a number of low margin regional projects at an early stage of predevelopment, totaling approx. 290,000 net selling sq meters; Post these disposals, the market value of the remaining portfolio increased by 3% to US$2.56bn (January 01 2010: US$2.48bn) as more active development activities triggered value accretion. Market portfolio value per square meter was up by 11% increased to US$238 (January 01 2010: US$214). Average discount rates on projects went down by 1ppt (19% on average for properties in the course of development vs. 20% as of January 01 2010; 26% on average for properties held for future development vs. 27% as of January 01 2010); Operational horizon at around 5 years in Moscow and Moscow region remains appropriate and safe. (1) unsold area; (2) master plan changes were driven by replacing poured concrete with pre-fabricated buildings, which are faster and cheaper to build, but have