DOCSLIB.ORG

Presentation of the Consolidated IFRS Results for 6 Months Ended June 30 2010 and Revaluation of Portfolio of Properties As of July 01 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Presentation of the consolidated IFRS results for 6 months ended June 30 2010 and revaluation of portfolio of properties as of July 01 2010 4 October 2010 Speakers: Andrey Rodionov, CFO Viktor Szalkay, IRO Content Title 1 Introduction 3 Sales & Marketing Update 6 Portfolio Overview 10 Financial Overview 15 Appendix 19 Top-15 Projects Overview 20 Disclaimer 30 2 Introduction 3 Proven execution in Russian real estate Key statistics 2007 2008 2009 1H09 1H10 Leading integrated homebuilder in Russia; Key operating indicators Focused on affordable residential housing Total housing completions ('000 sqm) (1) 1542 813 884 174 245 New sales contracts to customers (PIK share) 825 520 123 24 159 segment on Moscow Metropolitan market; ('000 sqm) (1) Transferred to customers (PIK share) ('000 sqm) (2) 992 378 492 110 152 Proven track record with over 10MM sq, meter completions (equivalent to over 170,000 units); Key financial indicators Consolidated Group revenue, US$MM (3) 2313 1355 1300 363 503 Founded in 1994, public since June 2007. Consolidated Group adjusted EBITDA, US$MM (3) 571 124 138 (13) (81) Note: 1. Management accounts 2. as per recognition criteria adopted under IFRS 3. 2007, 2008, 2009, 1H09, 1H10 P&L data was converted at 25.55, 24.86, 31.68, 33.05, 30.06 RUR/US$ exchange rates respectively Estimated market share in 2005-2010E (%) Volume of completed housing in 2000-2009 (sqm) 20% Russia Moscow Moscow Region PIK Group (thousand sq.m.) 16,0% 14,7% 15,0% 70 Russia (million sq.m.) 63,8 1800 16% 14,4% 61,0 59,8 1600 60 50,2 10,7% 11,3% 12% 1 542 1400 10,5% 13,9% 50 41,0 43,6 8,3% 1200 33,8 36,4 1 244 6,7% 40 31,7 1000 8% 8,7% 30,3 800 3,9% 4,3% 4,1% 30 884 3,1% 2,8% 827 813 600 4% 2,2% 20 400 2,9% 514 497 10 409 200 0% 261 0 167 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010E 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Note: market share is calculated as PIK completions divided by total completions in a specific region excluding individual housing Source: Rosstat, Company data construction. See below Russia: PIK completions of 1MM divided by estimated Russia completions of 24.5MM sqm Moscow: PIK completions of 0.3MM sqm divided by Moscow estimated completions of 2MM sqm; Moscow Region: PIK completions of 0.6MM sqm divided by Moscow Region estimated completions of 4MM sqm Source: Rosstat, Company data, 2010E are based on federal housing program 4 Sales & Marketing Update 5 Beginning of the next real estate cycle after bottoming out Starting summer 2009, positive signals were recorded showing that the Russian residential market bottomed out: Primary affordable housing market Average – maximum selling price decline vs. pre-crisis levels reached 23% price, Change since Change since in roubles, 45% in USD terms; Data as of July 1 2010 RUB/sq m MoM change ,% Oct 2009,% Sept 2008,% – in May-June 2009, residential prices in Moscow metropolitan Moscow 113 200 +0,7% +1,0% -6,3% Moscow Region 65 200 -0,4% +0,5% -6,9% market stabilized; Khimki 88 700 +0,6% +2,2% -7,3% Mytishchi 79 700 -1,4% +1,3% +1,0% – customer sentiment has changed; Dolgoprudny 77 200 0,0% +3,3% -5,2% – transaction volume increased and became recurring on a daily Lubertsy 64 500 +0,1% -1,5% -10,8% Lobnya 53 300 -1,6% +0,2% -17,6% basis; Dmitrov 46 200 -1,4% +4,5% -10,2% St, Petersburg 71 400 +1,1% 0,0% -22,2% – in December 2009, secondary market transactions in Moscow Russia’s regional cities (~1MM pp) 38 000 -0,9% -2,5% -23,7% Nizhniy Novgorod 47 300 -3,2% -5,2% -20,8% doubled vs. 2009 average; Yekaterinburg 47 300 +0,3% -1,8% -19,8% Novosibirsk 42 000 -0,5% -4,8% -16,6% – secondary market mortgage transactions in April 2010 reached Samara 34 500 -4,8% -15,7% -23,7% pre-crisis level; and Rostov-on-Don 38 900 -1,9% -5,0% -24,6% Ufa 38 100 +0,5% +0,1% -21,7% – pent-up demand on the secondary market showed higher Perm 35 700 -0,5% -3,9% -33,7% Kazan 37 900 +1,8% +8,1% -1,1% transaction volumes in 1H2010 than in almost any of the Tumen 37 100 +1,9% +0,7% -18,9% previous periods. Volgograd 36 700 +0,5% +2,2% -35,8% Chelyabinsk 32 500 -2,1% +0,9% -23,5% In line with PIK past estimations, the market recovery in 2010 is Omsk 28 200 +0,3% -0,1% -20,5% coming through increasing transaction volume at flat prices Source: Company Data, Company Research Moscow primary market performance in affordable housing (%) Transaction volume on Moscow secondary(1) market (units) Max price decline from pre-crisis highest level incl.hidden discounts Current price vs. pre-crisis highest level 12 000 2007 2008 USD/sqm RUB/sqm 2009 2010 10 000 0% -5% -5% 8 000 -18% -10% -23% -15% 6 000 -20% -45% -25% 4 000 -30% 2 000 -35% -40% 0 -45% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -50% Note: (!) existing home sales after title registration Source: IntermarkSavills Source: Federal Registration Chamber 6 Undergoing moderate market recovery in affordable housing segment PIK enjoys the benefits of the undergoing market Cash collections dynamics over time (RUB BN) (1) recovery in affordable housing segment: – total cash collections for the first six months of 12M08 44,8 13,5 3,5 61.9 2010 doubled YoY; 12M09 9,4 12,6 0,4 22.4 – cash collections from sale of apartments for the same period showed a five-fold YoY increase; 6M09 1,7 4,1 0,2 6.1 * 6M10 8,7 3,8 0,3 12.8 – total cash collections for 3Q10 were up by 75% 75% compared to 1H10; and 9M09 6,2 7,7 0,3 14.2 – contracted retail volume continued to gain 9M10E 13,6 8,2 1,1 22.3 momentum and reached sustainable monthly 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 levels (see next slide). Sales of apartments Construction services Others Note: *9M10 cash collections represent cash collection up to September 20 2010 Note: (1) excluding offsets, 9M10 cash collections represent cash collection up to September 20 2010 Source: Company data, Management accounts Breakdown of retail sales (units) Total contracted retail volume (RUB MM) 231 238 flats + ground floors/retail premises 222 855 804 parking 133 133 528 Total (FY09) – 1,386 (incl. 600 parking) 125 Total (FY09) – RUB4.5bn 471 375 310 66 66 154 244 57 58 152 217 209 227 37 147 96 91 20 70 44 53 55 43 39 30 10 19 Source: Company Data, Management Accounts, extracted as of August 2010 Source: Company Data, Management Accounts, extracted as of August 2010 7 9M 2010E update: clear-cut pick-up in demand from retail customers Average retail realized prices, 8M10 (ths,RUB / sqm) In 8M10, total contracted retail volume saw a ~5.3x 113,5 YoY growth in money terms; 101,7 96,4 98,2 98,5 92,7 92,3 92,8 Average monthly sales in 8M10 came to 311 units(1) vs. 81 units YoY; 68,1 67,7 67,3 63,6 63,9 65,7 63,9 65,9 Average daily sales(2) were at 15.4 units vs. 4.0 units (3) YoY and 38,3 35,6 34,3 37,1 37,4 36,1 32,8 31,1 In September 2010, following successful marketing sales campaign, average daily sales reached 21,6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug units. Moscow Moscow region Other regions Note: (1) units = flats + ground floors + parking lots Note: weighted average realized price is calculated as total sales divided by units weighted on projects (2) taking into account only business days Source: Company Data, Management Accounts (3) 12.4 units excluding parking lots vs.1.8 units YoY Breakdown of retail sales by region, 9M10E (units) Total contracted retail volume, 9M10E (MM RUB) Flats + ground floors Parking lots Moscow Moscow, Moscow 475 Region, Other Regions Moscow Region 75% 401 Other Regions 382 361 338 337 8M10 average monthly = 311 247 231 8M10 average monthly = 1,193 2 500 260 349 ~3.8x 190 266 341 298 159 1 557 1 488 ~5.3x 204 1 362 1 407 1 426 131 8M09 average monthly = 81 936 8M09 average monthly = 225 636 730 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept E Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept E Source: Company Data, Management Accounts, extracted as of September 2010 Source: Company Data, Management Accounts, extracted as of September 2010 8 Mortgages to be the next strong catalyst for the continuing market recovery . The Russian Government undertakes a set of measures to support mortgage market development and to make mortgages more affordable; . End of 2009, PIK entered into partnership agreement with Sberbank to provide mortgages on one PIK project. In September 2010, this programme was further extended. Similar programmes were launched with VTB24 and others (e.g. Svyazbank, BSGV, HFB); . In June 2010, PIK signed an agreement with Gazprombank, stipulating mortgages(1) on new properties under construction, which resulted in a significant increase in the share of sales funded by mortgages. Note: (1) RUB interest rate of 13%; LTV = 80%; maturity of up to 25 years Sberbank’s mortgage branch at PIK’s customer area on Barrikadnaya str, 19 Share of PIK sales funded by mortgages in Moscow Metropolitan area Total mortgage credits issued on a monthly basis (units) in 8M10 (% of total) Mortgage programmes with 2009 (Russia, '000 units, lhs) 16% Gazprombank on new 40 2010 (Russia, '000 units, lhs) 1400 2009 (Moscow, units, rhs) 14% properties under construction 35 2010 (Moscow, units, rhs) 1200 12% Mortgage programmes with a 30 number of banks on already 1000 10% constructed properties 25 800 8% 20 6% 600 15 4% 400 10 2% 5 200 0% 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec flat terms Source: management accounts Source: CBRF 9 Portfolio Overview 10 Landbank highlights as of July 1 2010 Portfolio dynamic Portfolio breakdown by geography 16 14.9MM sqm 1 200 14.2MM sqm By Unsold area By Market Value $1,000/sqm 14 Moscow Other $865/sqm 1 000 11.6MM sqm regions 12 10.8MM sqm 13% 12% 800 10 8.8MM sqm Moscow
Recommended publications
  • Street Retail Segment, a Number of Retail Sectors Kept Disappearing from the Traditional Tenant Pool

    Street Retail Segment, a Number of Retail Sectors Kept Disappearing from the Traditional Tenant Pool

    15 years on the Russian Retail Property Market RUSSIAN RETAIL PROPERTY MARKET REPORT 2013 HIGHLIGHTS Retail Property Market Report by MAGAZIN MAGAZINOV 2013 The year of 2013, especially the end of it, was marked by the lowered consumption rate among Russian consumers. Anticipation of a new crisis wave and negative predictions for the year of 2014 lead to a significant decrease in the consumer confidence index, shifting the focus of consumer behavior from buying to saving. Nevertheless, it is still too early to forecast negative trends for the market. There needs to be a more careful analysis of the trend data gathered in Q1–Q2 2014. In 2013 Moscow retail property market witnessed the unprecedentedly low amount of newly commissioned space with the unusually high amount of it planned for 2014. Provided that at least 50% of the space announced appears on the market in 2014, this will break the record of 2009. Last year Tashir Group of Companies became the most active developer on the capital's market with the two new shopping centers having become the largest openings of 2013. These amounted for 60% of the total GLA commissioned in 2013. Moscow retail property market demonstrates a clear cyclical pattern in the developer activity. Periods of recession - which usually last about 4 years - are followed by 1–2 years of active new retail space commission. Besides, for each new cycle the oscillatory amplitude grows larger. For example, after 4 years of stagnation and unprecedentedly low levels of new retail space development on the Moscow market (from 2005 till 2008), the next two years witnessed a burst of activity and record amounts of new retail space supply.
  • Become More Skillful Every Day. There Is No Limit to Perfection. Hagakure

    Become More Skillful Every Day. There Is No Limit to Perfection. Hagakure

    STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESS IN MOSCOW Become more skillful every day. There is no limit to perfection. Hagakure A PROPOS Robbie Williams was wrong when he referred to a Russian Today, these crimson jackets can only been businessman as “a modern Rasputin” in his famous hit found in museums. Modern Russian businessmen “Party Like a Russian.” But he’s not the only one to think have stopped wearing clothes that were popular so. A lot of businessmen abroad are convinced that doing among their predecessors in the 90s. Along with business in Russia is dangerous because anarchy and their appearance, their attitudes have changed lawlessness reign here. This is in spite of the fact that Russia as well. These days, Russian businessmen want keeps climbing up in the Doing Business rating, which is more than to make a lot of money. According to published every year by the World Bank. In just one year, one representative from the All-Russian Non- Russia jumped from 35th to 31st place. And keep in mind Governmental Organization of Small and Medium- that back in 2012, Russia was in 120th place! Unfortunately, Sized Business Opora Russia, a modern entrepreneur old habits die hard. As Karl Marx once pointed out, is, first and foremost, someone who is open to new “a person’s mind is the strongest fortress.” information. They have a different perspective on the world. Moreover, an entrepreneur's reputation Actually, the times when the first thing a foreign plays a much bigger role than it used to. Honesty and businessman did after coming to Russia was hire a reliability are valued, and partners who have stood bodyguard are long gone.
  • ON the ROAD City Moscow

    ON the ROAD City Moscow

    a a a s r Hotel Hilton i a y t k li s D vo o u M t o e l li k va a t y u u uc ry k o 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa e Ragout a a h p r k e a i y e h s e ulitsa Fadeeva t p s ga a v a s 4-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa ele p k p M D o y i s e 3 Sad r r a tsa ova k s e s uli p - naya Samotechnaya ulitsa ya NII Skoroy Pomoshchi a it ya tech Sadovaya -S s S u l 1-ya Brestskaya ulitsa ovaya Samo uk ’ kor Sad ha l p lo u 1 rev Sklifosovskogo e S Kazansky s t n k ulitsa Chayanova 1 ka y a ya p a az T u s T v lit y vokzal sa o h t e a i r K n l s lok h iy u k y s B ’ p a l - Kalanchevskaya ulitsa l a y reu eu e o e r 1 o r a p A. A. Chernikhov Design e Dokuchaev pereulok y 6 l iy e n B a Y y ’ u e s am h p and Architecture Studio l k z o u h r Sukharevskaya s O v k o s v k o y o a h y y K k a i h a u L c li r Ryazanskiy proezd ts a e n Novoryazanskaya ulitsa 1-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa s t a t la li n u a a iy o y l a K n Tsventoy bul’var u l’ p Sadovaya-Spasskaya ulitsa fa e m e r iu ultisa Petrovka r e a r e T p 52 k r Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya ulitsa 53 ya u n a a ulitsa Malaya Dmitrovka k v l iy o o e o lok v n l d reu ’ n pe k t Mayakovskaya eu Sa Maliy Karetniy l a e m r u s r 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa pe b S iy V n y y o a o r s n he o t ulitsa Mashi poryvaevoy z i t t l ru ni pereulok 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa etniy e O dniy Kar k u k Sad e v ereulo Orlikov pereulok o r arevskiy p Vasilyevskaya ulitsa S s kh Daev pereulok v T Bol’shoy Su 64 Ermitazh T o s Krasnovorotskiy proezd s v Mosproekt-2 k e i Tishinskaya ulitsa Yuliusa Fuchika y t p Pushkinskaya
  • Valuation Report PO-36/2017

    Valuation Report PO-36/2017

    Valuation Report PO-36/2017 A portfolio of real estate assets in Russia (St Petersburg, Moscow, Yekaterinburg) and Germany (Leipzig, Landshut, Munich) Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Ǩ, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Lyudmila Fradina, Tel. +7 812 3856106, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report Ň A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany Ň KF Ref: PO-36/2017 Ň Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Ň Date of issue: March 12, 2018 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia and in Munich, Leipzig and Landshut, Germany. Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure Ɣ Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below Ɣ Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
  • Property Portfolio Overview As of January 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview As of January 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview as of January 1 2010 June 8 2010 Executive summary Total net sellable area(1) decreased by approximately 22% to 11.59MM square meters (14.89MM as of April 1 2009), of which 96% is represented by residential area; Total landbank decreased by 3.3MM sqm since last appraisal date due to contracted presales, divested non-core projects and partially abandoned projects; 13% decrease in market portfolio value to US$2.48bn (April 1 2009: US$2.86bn) due to changes in the following assumptions: – postponed launches of perspective projects, especially in Russia‟s regions (by two and more years); – conservative assumptions applied towards upward trend in selling prices and construction costs in subsequent periods (these are dependent upon underlying average oil price assumptions derived from forecasts of leading investment banks and agencies); – remaining incumbencies on existing projects, where apartments have been already presold; Market portfolio value per square meter increased to US$214 (April 1 2009: US$192). Discount rate on projects remained flattish (20% on average for properties in the course of development vs. 21% YoY; 27% on average for properties held for future development vs. 26% YoY), while at the same time Russian risk free rate significantly contracted over the period and CB rate also declined by 5.25ppt down to 7.75% YTD; Operational horizon at around 5 years in Moscow and Moscow region remains appropriate and safe. (1) unsold area 2 Portfolio overview 3 Landbank highlights as of January 1 2010 NSA
  • Booklet En.Pdf

    Booklet En.Pdf

    ENGEOCOM’s significant contribution to the largest Moscow, Russian and international projects is a given fact… Hard work and creativity of thousands of employees are duly and highly rewarded; we are constantly moving up in our difficult and beloved business… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder METRO CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTION COMPLEX IN LOBNYA ROAD CONSTRUCTION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION AIRFIELD AND AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION HYDROTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION LICENSES, WARRANTS, CERTIFICATES TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 About the Company 14 Projects 19 Metro Construction 39 Production Complex in Lobnya 47 Road Construction 63 Civil Construction 93 Airfield and Airport Construction 103 Hydrotechnical Construction 109 Licenses, Warrants, Certificates Construction is a beautiful business because you leave things that will be used for years to come… Mikhail Rudyak, Company Founder ABOUT THE COMPANY ENGEOCOM Association JSC is one of Russia’s largest construction holdings. The company was established in 1989 and since its foundation has been focusing on design and development of the most challenging facilities. ENGEOCOM brand today encompasses operations of several enterprises with more than 6 thousand employees. Over 27 years, the holding has successfully implemented more than 250 projects in Russia and beyond. The company’s competitive advantage is the application of innovative technologies and tailor-made design solutions. The key areas of activity are metro construction, civil and road construction, and airfield construction. Over years, ENGEOCOM has succeeded in both keeping and significantly strengthening its positions on the Russian construction market. The association has turned into a multi-industry holding. The company has an extensive experience in carrying out major projects of development and refurbishment of transport infrastructure.
  • The Old Gets Older, and the New Grows Russian Proverb

    The Old Gets Older, and the New Grows Russian Proverb

    STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESS IN MOSCOW The old gets older, and the new grows Russian proverb A PROPOS It’s difficult to find a city in the world that’s developing as In other words, we don’t know what would have hap- quickly as Moscow right now. It seems that it’s changing for pened to Khrushchyovkas in the future had the brave and the better every 24 hours. Every day there is something new grandiose renovation program not been approved last year. in the Russian capital: a new metro station opens, a new Just think: after it’s complete, people who currently live in road is being built, a new cafe or concert hall… It’s almost 350,000 apartments will be relocated to new, comfortable, like no change comes as a surprise anymore. At least that’s environmentally friendly housing. what everybody thought until last summer — until Sergey But this program will entail more than just the construction Sobyanin approved the renovation program on August 1, of new homes. It will also create an appealing, high-quality 2017. According to the program, over 5,000 residential urban environment in the renovated districts. buildings will be demolished within the next fifteen years. This number is shocking, considering that in most countries The scope of the renovation program is so broad that it will demolishing just one building would be a problem. require investments that, according to various estimates, may amount to $50 billion. It’s not a small sum of money. The project concerns old residential buildings — the Can foreign investors invest in this program? This question is so-called “Khrushchyovkas.” The buildings got this name worth asking.
  • Valuation Report PO-20/2016

    Valuation Report PO-20/2016

    Valuation Report PO-20/2016 A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 10, 2017 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Б, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Maria Chernook, Tel. +7 812 3205654, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report │ A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia │ KF Ref: PO-20/2016 │ Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC │ Date of issue: March 10, 2017 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements.
  • Report and Valuation for Sistema Hals

    Report and Valuation for Sistema Hals

    REPORT AND VALUATION FOR SISTEMA HALS BOL. TATARSKAYA, 115184, MOSCOW RUSSIA OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: “THE MARGARITA PROPERTIES” 1ST JANUARY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE OF INSTRUCTIONS .............................................................................................................3 2. BASIS OF VALUATION......................................................................................................................4 3. TENURE AND TENANCIES ............................................................................................................4 4. NET ANNUAL RENT..........................................................................................................................5 5. TOWN PLANNING..............................................................................................................................6 6. STRUCTURE...........................................................................................................................................6 7. SITE AND CONTAMINATION .......................................................................................................7 8. PLANT AND MACHINERY...............................................................................................................7 9. INSPECTIONS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ..............................................................................7 10. GENERAL PRINCIPLES...................................................................................................................7 11. SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS,
  • Property Portfolio Overview As of July 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview As of July 1 2010

    Property Portfolio Overview as of July 1 2010 October 04 2010 Executive summary Total net selling area (1) decreased by approximately 7% to 10.76mln square meters (January 01 2010: 11.59mln sq meters), of which 97% is represented by residential area; Decrease of 832,000 sq meters was mainly due to: – pre-sales of approx. 159,000 sq meters (including retail sales of approx 94,000 sqm as reported on July 7 2010) for the first six months ended June 30 2010; – changed master plans for certain residential projects located in the Moscow metropolitan area for the total amount of approx. 383,000 net selling sq meters(2); – reduction of interest in a number of low margin regional projects at an early stage of predevelopment, totaling approx. 290,000 net selling sq meters; Post these disposals, the market value of the remaining portfolio increased by 3% to US$2.56bn (January 01 2010: US$2.48bn) as more active development activities triggered value accretion. Market portfolio value per square meter was up by 11% increased to US$238 (January 01 2010: US$214). Average discount rates on projects went down by 1ppt (19% on average for properties in the course of development vs. 20% as of January 01 2010; 26% on average for properties held for future development vs. 27% as of January 01 2010); Operational horizon at around 5 years in Moscow and Moscow region remains appropriate and safe. (1) unsold area; (2) master plan changes were driven by replacing poured concrete with pre-fabricated buildings, which are faster and cheaper to build, but have