DOCSLIB.ORG

The Confederate Battle Flag: a Symbol of Truth & Freedom!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Confederate Battle Flag: a Symbol of Truth & Freedom! ODV March 2017 Edited By: Vol 1: Issue 10 Old Dominion Voice Travis Toombs The Confederate Battle Flag: A Symbol of Truth & Freedom! “We should honor this flag today because it honors the principles for which our forefathers fought and died – truth, liberty, freedom, right, and faith.” - Pastor John Weaver (click here) (click here) The Official Newsletter of the Virginia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans There is more than just one Confederate Flag First National Confederate Flag Second National Confederate Flag 1861 Prototype, Confederate Army of the Third National Confederate Flag Potomac Battle Flag 1861 Silk , Confederate Army of the Potomac 1862 Cotton, Confederate Army of the Battle Flag Potomac Battle Flag There is more than just one Confederate Flag 1862 1st Wool Bunting Issue, Confederate 1862 2nd Wool Bunting Issue, Confederate Army of Northern Virginia Battle Flag Army of Northern Virginia Battle Flag 1863 3rd Wool Bunting Issue, Confederate 1865 7th Wool Bunting Issue, Confederate Army of Northern Virginia Battle Flag Army of Northern Virginia Battle Flag “Hardee’s Corps Flag,” Confederate Army of “Polk’s Corps Flag,” Confederate Army of Tennessee Tennessee There is more than just one Confederate Flag “Taylor’s Flag,” Confederate “Van Dorn’s Flag,” Confederate Trans-Mississippi Department Trans-Mississippi Department Style of Forrest’s Cavalry Corps Confederate Confederate Battle Flag from Missouri Flag “Cherokee Braves Flag,” Confederate Flag General Lee’s Headquarters Confederate representing 5 Native American tribes Flag, 1861 - 1863 Table of Contents ● Commander’s Report pg. 7 ● Heritage Defense Report pg. 8 “ S T O H N ● Chaplain’s Comments pg. 9 E S ● Thoughts of a Millennial pg.10 O of ○ WHO Do The Confederate Flags Represent? L D C ● 1st Brigade Report pg.12 O D N ● 2nd Brigade Report pg.14 O F ● 3rd Brigade Report pg.16 M E ● 4th Brigade Report pg.18 I D N E ● 5th Brigade Report pg.22 ● 6th Brigade Report pg.25 I R O A ● 7th Brigade Report pg.28 N T “ E ● 155 Years Ago pg.32 ○ March 1862 D V ● Confederate Flag Day pg.33 I E ● 2017 Division Convention pg.36 V T ● 100th Anniversary Monument pg.41 I E S R ● Division Belt Buckles pg.42 I A ● Confederate Calendar pg.43 O N N S ● Auld Lang Syne pg.45 ○ Written by Pastor John Weaver Charge to the Sons of Confederate Veterans “To you, Sons of Confederate Veterans, we will commit the vindication of the Cause for which we fought. To your strength will be given the defense of the Confederate soldier’s good name, the guardianship of his history, the emulation of his virtues, the perpetuation of those principles which he loved and which you love also, and those ideals which made him glorious and which you also cherish.” Lt. General Stephen Dill Lee Commander-in-Chief United Confederate Veterans April 24, 1906 (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) Virginia Division Executive Council Officers Commander 1st Lt. Commander Tony Griffin Edwin Ray 2nd Lt. Commander Quartermaster Johnny Neville Ron Moore Archivist Adjutant Russ Edwards Greg Mays Chaplin Inspector Fred Chiesa Bob Shirley Jr. Treasurer Chief of Heritage Defense Bill Graham B. Frank Earnest Past Commander Past Commander L. Tracy Clary J. Michael Pullen Commander’s Report Commander Tony Griffin - [email protected] Compatriots, issue and on our Facebook page and plan to be there. I've been hearing a lot of Don't forget to register for the Division concerns over Convention to be held April 21 - 23 at the monument the Berry Hill Resort in South Boston. issue in The John M. Jordan Camp #581 has Charlottesville. done an outstanding job setting up this Let me say that event at this historic plantation. we are Consider sending a delegate and proceeding with this in accordance having your Camp put in for the with the advice from our legal team. Outstanding Camp Award. There are those that are saying that we didn't do as we promised. My We are still in the process of getting answer is, YES we did! We were ready the Division website up and running. to file the morning after the Until that time, updates will be placed Charlottesville City council meeting on the Division Facebook page and made their decision to remove the The John M. Jordan Camp has made monument if necessary. Their actions space for the newsletter to be posted did not make it necessary to file on their web page at immediately and it allows us to make http://johnmjordanscv.org/ for those sure that we have an appropriate plan that don't use Facebook. We will also in place to ensure victory over these be putting information out on the people that desire to destroy Our Virginia Courier mailing list. Heritage and violate the laws of Virginia at the same time. We will There are a lot of events coming up in notify you of the actions taken at the the next few months and have been or appropriate time. We have the backing will be posted on the Courier and the of our International SCV and CiC Tom Facebook page. Strain has put out notifications stating their backing. We will defeat these I hope to see a lot of you next miscreants! Saturday at Oakwood. Saturday March 4th is national Deo Vindice, Confederate Flag Day. The Virginia Tony Division is hosting our program at Oakwood Confederate Cemetery in Richmond at 2 PM. There will be a speaker, cannons and lots of Confederate Flags, see the flier in this 7 - Old Dominion Voice March 2017 Heritage Defense Chief of Heritage Defense Frank Earnest - [email protected] Compatriots, ideas on how to deface it. If you are reading Many of you have asked if the Virginia this report you are Division will take legal action and when. We probably doing so are being represented and advised by legal by way of counsel. We will take the proper steps and Facebook. Due respond at the right time. to very unfortunate We (the Virginia Division Executive Council) circumstances the have had representation at all Charlottesville Virginia Division City Council Meetings that have dealt with web site this issue. Treasurer Bill Graham, Brigade has not been fully functioning for some time. Commander Michael Virts, and even Our Commander Tony Griffin and others are Chaplain Fred Chiesa have been at these working diligently to restore the site to full meetings. The members of the DEC and up to date operations. represent YOU the members of the Virginia Division SCV and no one else. We have Until then the John M. Jordan Camp # 581 made no bold public threats, we don't shout has offered space on their web site for the out at these meetings, and we don't get Old Dominion Voice. dragged from the council chamber by the Please tell your compatriots who do not have police. access to Facebook to go to their web site. We have and will continue to keep you Again, if you are reading this on Facebook informed. We will not make public statements you should know almost as much as I do that will help our enemies. The SCV is the about the situation in Charlottesville. The oldest male and foremost Confederate Division has done all it can to keep you Heritage Defense Organization. No other informed. City Councils do not decide organization can say that they were given controversial issues in one session. They their charge by the Confederate Veterans can also be evasive about when they will themselves. Simply put, the SCV is the NRA vote on these issues. It is amazing how of Southern Heritage. those who call for openness can try so hard to keep everyone in the dark. The This is not our first fight, nor will it be our last. Charlottesville City Council put out the word We will continue to base our actions on the that they would not take a vote on February 6 "Charge" given to us by General Stephen D. to move the General Lee Statue/Monument. Lee. I am glad that I was there to hear them take B. Frank Earnest the very vote that they said they would not Heritage Defense Coordinator take that night. If you heard that the vote was 3 to 2, don't get the wrong idea. The 2 no votes had to do with logistics, finances, and other concerns. Those 2 (the Mayor and 1 councilman) also have hateful, bigoted views of our Southern Heritage. If the statue / monument is not moved they have other 8 - Old Dominion Voice March 2017 Chaplain’s Comments Chaplain Fred Chiesa - [email protected] Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you. Yes we are to honor our parents. “Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee” (Ex. 20:12). Does this mean just our parents or does it include our great or great-great or great-great-great parents? All of them must be honored because we are descended by blood from them. Honor is due to our God in three persons, our elderly and our parents of every generation we know about, yes even our Confederate ones. Oh, what they sacrificed for us and their country. President Jefferson Davis gave what should be a warning to us when he said, “Nothing fills me with deeper sadness than to see a Southerner apologizing for the defense we made of our inheritance.” 9 - Old Dominion Voice March 2017 Thoughts of a Millennial WHO Do The Confederate Flags Represent? By: Travis Toombs - [email protected] The argument of WHAT the Confederate Flags represent is an argument that just about all of us have had.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The State Flag of Georgia: the 1956 Change in Its Historical Context
    The State Senate Senate Research Office Bill Littlefield 204 Legislative Office Building Telephone Managing Director 18 Capitol Square 404/ 656 0015 Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Martha Wigton Fax Director 404/ 657 0929 The State Flag of Georgia: The 1956 Change In Its Historical Context Prepared by: Alexander J. Azarian and Eden Fesshazion Senate Research Office August 2000 Table of Contents Preface.....................................................................................i I. Introduction: National Flags of the Confederacy and the Evolution of the State Flag of Georgia.................................1 II. The Confederate Battle Flag.................................................6 III. The 1956 Legislative Session: Preserving segregation...........................................................9 IV. The 1956 Flag Change.........................................................18 V. John Sammons Bell.............................................................23 VI. Conclusion............................................................................27 Works Consulted..................................................................29 Preface This paper is a study of the redesigning of Georgia’s present state flag during the 1956 session of the General Assembly as well as a general review of the evolution of the pre-1956 state flag. No attempt will be made in this paper to argue that the state flag is controversial simply because it incorporates the Confederate battle flag or that it represents the Confederacy itself. Rather, this paper will focus on the flag as it has become associated, since the 1956 session, with preserving segregation, resisting the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and maintaining white supremacy in Georgia. A careful examination of the history of Georgia’s state flag, the 1956 session of the General Assembly, the designer of the present state flag – John Sammons Bell, the legislation redesigning the 1956 flag, and the status of segregation at that time, will all be addressed in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVELLER Award Winning Publication of the General Robert E
    TRAVELLER Award Winning Publication of the General Robert E. Lee Camp, #1640 Sons of Confederate Veterans, Germantown, TN Duty, Honor, Integrity, Chivalry DEO VINDICE! August 2020 in political circles, cannot financially support key candidates that might be our advocate and essentially has CAMP MEETING no leverage for or against anyone currently in office. August 10, 2020 Mike cited a shining example of an organization that has made great use of this structure to their advantage is the Speaker: Lee Millar NRA. They are an advocacy group with a business model Topic: Forrest Funeral and Statue Re- built to “play the game” that needs to be played if you Dedication Update want to get anything accomplished. We, the SCV, are a historical group with advocacy needs that we have no 7:00 PM chance in today’s world of meeting being structured as we are. He’s right about that. To be perfectly frank, we John Green Library are an ad-hoc collection of letter writers, emailers and 205 Mills Street, Collierville, TN phone callers. We stay after it and are passionate, but it’s not working. What are your thoughts? Perhaps we can Don’t miss our next meeting! discuss at the next Camp meeting. A few of the ideas I had brought to the meeting were: Commander’s Corner 1. Put pressure, especially if you are a member, on This month’s edition will be shorter than usual and direct recognized and influential historical organizations to the unpleasant topic of our scorecard lately in the effort (like Battlefield Trust, formerly Civil War Trust or to stop the destruction of all our Southern Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutional Determinants of Southern Secession Mario Chacon
    The Institutional Determinants of Southern Secession Mario Chacon and Jeffrey Jensen Working Paper # 0001 March 2017 Division of Social Science Working Paper Series New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island P.O Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, UAE https://nyuad.nyu.edu/en/academics/divisions/social-science.html The Institutional Determinants of Southern Secession Mario Chacony Jeffrey Jensenz March 2017 Abstract We use the Southern secession movement of 1860-1861 to study how elites in democracy enact their preferred policies. Most states used specially convened conven- tions to determine whether or not to secede from the Union. We argue that although the delegates of these conventions were popularly elected, the electoral rules favored slaveholders. Using an original dataset of representation in each convention, we first demonstrate that slave-intensive districts were systematically overrepresented. Slave- holders were also spatially concentrated and could thereby obtain local pluralities in favor of secession more easily. As a result of these electoral biases, less than 10% of the electorate was sufficient to elect a majority of delegates in four of the six original Confederate states. We also show how delegates representing slave-intensive counties were more likely to support secession. These factors explain the disproportionate influence of slaveholders during the crisis and why secessionists strategically chose conventions over statewide referenda. We thank Howard Rosenthal, Scott Gates, Abdul Noury, Ana Arjona, Laurel Har- bridge, Jeff Timmons, Jim Alt, David Stasavage, Leonid Peisakhin, and seminar partici- pants at the 2014 MPSA Annual Conference, the EPSA Conference 2014, Universidad del Rosario, and Northwestern University for their helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Duelling in the United States
    The Woman's College of The University of North Carolina LIBRARY COLLEGE COLLECTION CQ no. 652 Gift of MARTIN LUTHER WILSON " WILSON, MARTIN LUTHER. A Survey of Duelling in the United States. (1969). Directed by: Dr» Richard Bardolph. pp. t2» This thesis was undertaken to study duelling as an aspect of social history in the United States. The aim of the researciier was to go beyond mere cnronicling of particu- lar duels, in an effort to ascertain feelings and attitudes toward the practice. To obtain such information, both pub- lished and unpublished sources were consulted, to reconstruct the story of duelling as it developed in America. The duel grew out of European practices, particularly the chivalry associated with knighthood. The custom was later transported to America by European settlers, though few duels occurred before the American Revolution. The presence of aristocratic European officers in America during that con- flict influenced natives, who retained the duelling custom. The duel was present in all sections of the new nation until Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton in 160^-. At that point the duel lost favor in the Northern states, but held on pri- marily in the Southern states. Northern political leaders and military men continued to duel from time to time, however. For conducting the duelling ritual, there were various sets of written rules, the most widely used being those compiled by Governor John Lyde Wilson of South Carolina. These rules laid down the principles that duels should be only betv/een social equals, that all negotiations be con- ducted by seconds chosen for that purpose, and that the ( actual encounter be carried out fairly under rules agreed upon beforehand.
    [Show full text]
  • President-Elect in Springfield (1860-1861)
    Chapter Seventeen “I Will Suffer Death Before I Will Consent to Any Concession or Compromise”: President-elect in Springfield (1860-1861) During the four months separating his election from his inauguration, Lincoln faced the daunting challenge of Southern secession. Though he would not officially take power until March 1861, his party looked to him for guidance. Like most Republicans, he was startled when the Cotton States made good their supposedly idle threats to withdraw from the Union.1 Should they be allowed to go in peace? Should they be forcibly resisted? Should they be conciliated or appeased? What compromise measures might preserve national unity without sacrificing the party’s principles? Radicals like Zachariah Chandler believed “all will be well” if Lincoln would only “‘Stand like an Anvil when the sparks fall thick & fast, a fiery shower,’” but some Republicans feared that he would not do so.2 A few days after the election, Charles Francis Adams viewed Southern threats to secede as a means “to frighten Mr Lincoln at the outset, and to compel him to declare himself in opposition to the principles of the party that has elected him.” Adams confessed that the awaited the president-elect’s 1 David M. Potter, Lincoln and His Party in the Secession Crisis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1942), 75-80. 2 Zachariah Chandler to Lyman Trumbull, Detroit, 13 November 1860, Trumbull Family Papers, Lincoln Presidential Library, Springfield. Chandler was quoting, somewhat inaccurately, from a poem by George Washington Doane. 1875 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 1, Chapter 17 reaction “with some misgivings,” for “the swarms that surround Mr Lincoln are by no means the best.”3 Adams need not have worried, for Lincoln sided with the “stiff-backed” Republicans in rejecting any concession of basic principle, just as he had rebuffed those eastern Republicans who two years earlier had supported the reelection of Douglas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fire-Eaters, the South, and Secession. (Volumes I and II)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1988 The irF e-Eaters, the South, and Secession. (Volumes I and II). Eric Harry Walther Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Walther, Eric Harry, "The irF e-Eaters, the South, and Secession. (Volumes I and II)." (1988). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4548. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4548 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. U M I film s the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send U M I a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these w ill be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted m aterial had to be removed, a note w ill indicate the deletion. Oversize m aterials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections w ith sm all overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Azu Etd Mr 2011 0090 Sip1 M.Pdf
    Expectant Immediatism: The South Carolina Secession Movement, 1859-1861 Item Type Electronic Thesis; text Authors Harvey, Sean Parulian Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 01:20:16 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/144326 Table of Contents Introduction: A Reputation for Disunion .............................................................................................. 1 Part I: To Sow the Seeds of Disunion: Christopher Memminger’s Mission to Virginia .......................... 10 Part II: The Ties that Bind: The Association of 1860, Circular Letters and Fort Sumter ......................... 25 Conclusion: Expectations Fulfilled ...................................................................................................... 36 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Introduction: A Reputation for Disunion In the fall of 1860, South Carolinians thought they were living in precarious times. A group of concerned citizens, ever‐fearful of the growing power of the Republican Party, met in the waterfront town of Charleston, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendering Secession: Women and Politics in South Carolina, 1859- 1861
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Spring 2020 Gendering Secession: Women and Politics in South Carolina, 1859- 1861 Melissa DeVelvis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation DeVelvis, M.(2020). Gendering Secession: Women and Politics in South Carolina, 1859- 1861. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5709 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENDERING SECESSION : WOMEN AND POLITICS IN SOUTH CAROLINA , 1859- 1861 by Melissa DeVelvis Bachelor of Arts University of Georgia, 2014 Bachelor of Arts University of Georgia, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2020 Accepted by: Mark M. Smith, Major Professor Woody Holton III, Committee Member Marjorie Spruill, Committee Member Sarah Gardner, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Melissa DeVelvis, 2020 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION To my sisters, Addie and Paige. Agents of chaos. The DeVelvi triumvirate. You've had my heart from the very beginning. Every day I strive to be a person worthy of your love and friendship. The best version of myself is one that you're proud of. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank OneNote, dry shampoo, my dog, hot yoga, and Radiohead. I feel like a certain amount of levity is necessary under the circumstances, as we experience a global pandemic in the form of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phillips, Ulrich B., Ed. the Correspondence of Robert Toombs
    Phillips, Ulrich B., ed. The Correspondence of Robert Toombs, Alexander H. Stephens, and Howell Cobb. Washington, D.C.: American Historical Association, 1913. Linton and growing support for Douglas, 500 Saddened by northern elections results, blames this on Buchanan break with Douglas, 501 Stephens speaking for Douglas, secessionists, 501-2 Georgia, election, Breckinridge, not surprised by Lincoln's election, 502-3 Stephens, Hopes for maintaining rights in the Union, dangers of revolution, 504-5 Cobb, secession, Lincoln, Republicans, black equality, fugitive slave law, 505-16 Cobb resigns from cabinet, does not blame Buchanan, 518-19 Cobb, speaking for secession elections, 518-19 Robert Toombs, on the crisis and secession, timing, 519-22 William Henry Trescott, secession, 522 Mrs. Jacob Thompson on resignations and excitement in Washington, society, 522-24 Howell Cobb, speaking appointments, 524 Robert Toombs, Republicans rejected all compromise including Crittenden proposal, committee of thirteen, 525 Shot and shell for Confederate government, 525-26 Stephens, colonization, constitution, secession of Georgia likely, 526 Toombs on cabinet resignations, 528 William Porcher Miles, secession, Sumter, resistance, 528-29 William Henry Trescott, cabinet resignations, Buchanan, Anderson, Sumter, secession of Georgia, organization of a southern government, 530-31 Jacob Thompson, Buchanan, Holt, Star of the West, Sumter, Winfield Scott, secession, new confederacy, 531-33 Texas, secession, Houston hostile, 533 Raphael Semmes, serve in Confederate
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2015 (September 2014 - August 2015)
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2015 (September 2014 - August 2015) Headquarters & Museum The National Society of The Colonial Dames of America LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN Dear Friends, This year marked the launch of a renewed brand for Dumbarton House, setting forth our identity as a national headquarters and museum telling The Story of Courage, Preservation, and the Rise of a Nation. You’ll find this new visual identity reflected in the redesigned “look” of this year’s Annual Report, but elements of the brand were apparent throughout the year in the work accomplished here at Dumbarton House. Courage: In our headquarters role, we supported the NSCDA—a group of women who have had the courage to save so many important historical buildings and artifacts over the past 124 years—its 44 Corporate Societies, and over 15,000 individual members nationwide. Biennial Council meetings and workshops brought over 300 members to the Washington, DC region last fall and launched an ambitious new Strategic Plan for the Society. Preservation: Efforts to maintain and restore our 216 year old historic house and grounds this year included rebuilding our lovely Upper Terrace Balustrade to correct dangerous structural instabilities. Meanwhile, work commenced inside on readying the museum’s Lower Passage staircase to accept period appropriate carpeting. The Rise of a Nation: The museum collection grew with the acquisition of a number of new artifacts—allowing us to tell a more complete story of the early days of our country and its new capital city; while engaging new educa- tional and community programs helped neighbors, tourists, and students learn about this often overlooked period of American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2010 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 4-2010 Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2010 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report, April 2010". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm/2/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Annual Program, 24 April 2010 PRESIDENTS THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY 1937–1943 .............................................................................M.L. Bonham 1944–1953 ................................................................... J. Heyward Gibbes 1954 ................................................................................ Samuel L. Prince 1954–1960 ........................................................ Caroline McKissick Belser 1960–1963 ................................................................. James H. Hammond 1963–1966 ................................................................. Robert H. Wienefeld 1966–1969 ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flags of the Confederate States of America
    Flags of the Confederate States of America This article is about historical uses of ags asso- ciated with the Confederate States of America. For modern uses, see Modern display of the Confederate ag. There were three successive national ag designs that served as the ocial national flags of the Confeder- ate States of America (the "Confederate States" or the "Confederacy") during its existence from 1861 to 1865. Since the end of the American Civil War, private and of- cial use of the Confederacy's ags, and of ags with derivative designs, has continued under philosophical, political, cultural, and racial controversy in the United States. These include ags displayed in states; cities, towns and counties; schools, colleges and universities; private organizations and associations; and by individu- als. The state ag of Mississippi features the familiar Con- federate battle ag in the canton, or upper left corner, the only current U.S. state ag to do so. Georgia’s state ag is very similar to the rst national ag of the Confeder- acy, the “Stars and Bars"; a prior design incorporating the Confederate battle ag was in use from 1956 until 2001. Three versions of the flag of the Confederate States of Amer- ica and the Confederate Battle Flag are shown on this printed poster from 1896. The “Stars and Bars” can be seen in the up- 1 National flags per left. Standing at the center are Stonewall Jackson, P. G. T. Beauregard, and Robert E. Lee, surrounded by bust portraits of 1.1 First national flag: “The Stars and Jefferson Davis, Alexander Stephens, and various Confederate army officers, such as James Longstreet and A.
    [Show full text]