1325 Arch Street – Landmark Or Structure of Merit (#LMIN2020-0008)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1325 Arch Street – Landmark Or Structure of Merit (#LMIN2020-0008) ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 L ANDMARKS P RESERVATION C OMMISSION S t a f f R e p o r t FOR COMMISSION ACTION AUGUST 5, 2021 1325 Arch Street – The Schneider/Kroeber House Landmark application #LMIN2020-0008 for the consideration of City Landmark or Structure of Merit designation status for a single-family residence constructed in 1907 – APN 060-2465-027-00 I. Application Basics A. Land Use Designations: Zoning: R-1(H), Single-Family Residential/Hillside Overlay B. CEQA Determination: Exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 C. Parties Involved: • Initiated by: Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) • Recorder: Steve Finacom, Commissioner • Property Owner: Golden Bear, LLC 1325 Arch Street Berkeley, CA D. Staff Recommendation: Hold a public hearing and consider final action on this request. 1947 Center Street, 2nd Fl., Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.7410 TDD: 510.981.7474 Fax: 510.981.7420 ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 1325 ARCH STREET LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION Page 2 of 10 August 5, 2021 Figure 1: Vicinity Map – highlighting nearby City Landmarks and Structures of Merit Project Site North ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1325 ARCH STREET August 5, 2021 Page 3 of 10 Figure 2: Subject property, current conditions – primary (west) facade (Photo by C. Enchill) ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 1325 ARCH STREET LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION Page 4 of 10 August 5, 2021 Figure 3: Subject property, architectural drawing by Maybeck & White Architects– primary (west) facade (no date) Figure 4: Subject property, rendering by unknown author, no date ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1325 ARCH STREET August 5, 2021 Page 5 of 10 II. Application Chronology At the regular meeting on October 1, 2020, LPC received a memorandum from Commissioners Finacom and Schwartz, requesting that the Commission initiate the subject property for City Landmark or Structure of Merit status. The Commission voted 7-0-1-1 to initiate this consideration in accordance with Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Section 3.24.120. On October 20, 2020, staff sent a letter to the property owner informing them of the initiation and public hearing on December 3, 2020. At the December meeting, LPC opened the hearing in accordance with the timeframe required under the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance [Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Section 3.24.130], but continued the hearing in order to grant additional time for Commissioner Finacom to prepare a Landmark application. On July 15, 2021, Commissioner Finacom submitted the Landmark application for this property, and it is provided as Attachment 1 of this report. On July 26, 2021, staff mailed and posted 10-day advance notices for tonight’s meeting, in accordance with BMC Section 3.24.140. III. Historic Resource Status The subject property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NR) or the California Register of Historic Properties. However, it does appear on the State Historic Resources inventory with a status code “3S,” indicating that it appears to be eligible for listing on the NR as an individual property. Nearby City Landmarks include the Wallace Sauer House (1905) at 1340 Arch Street, the Scrarich Hunrich Grocery (1908) at 2270 Rose Street, and the Byrne House and Grounds, Napoleon Bonaparte (1868) at 1301 Oxford Street; see Figure 1. IV. Property Description The subject property is an approximately 6,500-sq. ft., interior lot on the east side of the 1300-block of Arch Street, located in the Berkeley Hills neighborhood. The rectangular parcel is oriented in the east-west direction and slopes steeply upward from Arch Street. It is covered with mature vegetation, dense in some areas, and features a detached, one-car garage with a roof deck at the front property line and a 2 ½-story main building located roughly in the center of the parcel, setback from Arch Street by approximately 26 ft. and from the rear property line by approximately 12 ft. A low, rhyolite stone retaining wall with a wood fence above and gate with a trellis are located in the front yard and positioned immediately adjacent to the sidewalk; see Figures 2 and 4. Construction of the approximately 3,500-sq. ft., single-family residence was completed in 1907. It was designed by the firm Maybeck & White Architects, led by renowned ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 1325 ARCH STREET LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION Page 6 of 10 August 5, 2021 Berkeley architect Bernard Maybeck. The Landmark application provided as Attachment 1, includes a detailed description of the building and grounds. In order to provide only a brief description here, staff points out that the building follows a rectangular plan, raises two-to-three stories (on east-west sloping terrain) and features a cross gable roof with wide projecting eaves held up by exposed rafter tails and brackets. The entire building exterior is composed of unpainted wood board siding and trim; the siding is horizontal on the lower levels and vertical on the third story. The building has wood windows and doors throughout, and wide, projecting decks and porches with wood cut-out railings. The primary, street-facing façade is the three-story west elevation that is comprised of a gable wall end and a partial cross gable, a door, three windows, and a deck at the uppermost level; two windows on either side of a centered, double door served by a projecting deck on the middle level; and two windows on either side of a double door at the lower level, which is obscured by vegetation. The building is an example of the First Bay Tradition architectural style, and the Landmark application recorder further identifies its design as a specific example of the Chalet style within Maybeck’s body of work. Brief History since 1907. The building was commissioned by the original owners and occupants, Albert (1863?-1928) and Mary Schneider, who owned the property at least until Albert Kroeber (1876-1960) and Theodora (nee Kracaw) Kroeber (1897 -1979) purchased it in the 1920s and owned it -- jointly or solely -- until the latter’s death. Thereafter, several owners are recognized: John Harrison Quinn (b. 1940), Lisa Stadelhofer, Ceila Ramsay and Kent Rasmussen, and (currently) Golden Bear LLC, a hospitality enterprise. After its initial construction in 1907, the building was expanded in 1933 to include a rear, two-story addition and the aforementioned garage, which is composed of formed concrete. The design of these features has not been attributed to an architect, and the Landmarks application cites the builder as Richard H. Williams. Based on historic photographs, a second-story deck on the south (side) elevation was enclosed and converted to a sleeping porch. Beyond these exterior changes, there are no other exterior building alternations described in the Landmark record or documented in the City permit archives. A complete and extensive property history is provided in the Landmark application; see Attachment 1. V. Analysis and Evaluation The analysis section of this report will refer to the research and information provided in the Landmark application (Attachment 1) regarding the subject property’s historic context and existing conditions. This section analyzes the extent to which the property ITEM 6 LPC 08-05-21 LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1325 ARCH STREET August 5, 2021 Page 7 of 10 appears to meet significance criteria set forth in the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance (LPO), Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 3. Historic Context1. Given its 1907 date of completion and type of construction (e.g.: residential/single-family), the subject site is associated with the theme of residential development. Its period of significance is understood to have begun with its construction in 1907, and estimated to have lasted until the time of its first documented structural alteration in 1933. Additionally, persons worthy of study occupied the subject residence from 1928 to 1979, so this time period must also be reviewed for possible significance. Landmarks Preservation Ordinance Significance Criteria. When it designates a property as a Landmark, Historic District, or Structure of Merit, the Commission must find that the property meets one or more of the required criteria codified in LPO, BMC Section 3.24.110. These criteria are relatively specific and appear to align with California Register and National Register criteria. The significance criteria for a Structure of Merit are broader than those for Landmarks status, and include properties that qualify individually as good examples of architectural design, or that qualify as contributors to the context of a larger streetscape or area. The Landmark application for the residence at 1325 Arch Street is dense with information and provides evidence for the Commission’s consideration of the property for designation as a City of Berkeley Landmark primarily for its exceptional architectural design and extant condition wherein it retains its original building features. The application provides additional information for the consideration of other criteria, including cultural and historical value. Each of these significance criterions is discussed below. Landmark criterion – Architectural Merit Based on the research and evidence presented in the Landmark application, the residential property at 1325 Arch Street appears to meet the LPO Landmark designation criterion for architectural merit owing to its design by Berkeley’s premiere architect Bernard Maybeck and its high degree of historical integrity. Specifically, the property is found to
Recommended publications
  • A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3d5n99tn No online items Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Processed by Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron; machine-readable finding aid created by James Lake The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, University of California --History, UC BerkeleyGeographical (by Place) --University of California --University of California BerkeleySocial Sciences --AnthropologySocial Sciences --Area and Interdisciplinary Studies --Native American Studies Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 1 Papers, 1869-1972 Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Collection number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: James Lake © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: A. L. Kroeber Papers, Date (inclusive): 1869-1972 Collection Number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 Creator: Kroeber, A. L. (Alfred Louis), 1876-1960 Extent: Originals: 40 boxes, 21 cartons, 14 volumes, 9 oversize folders (circa 45 linear feet)Copies: 187 microfilm reels: negative (Rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Clifford-Ishi's Story
    ISHI’S STORY From: James Clifford, Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the 21st Century. (Harvard University Press 2013, pp. 91-191) Pre-publication version. [Frontispiece: Drawing by L. Frank, used courtesy of the artist. A self-described “decolonizationist” L. Frank traces her ancestry to the Ajachmem/Tongva tribes of Southern California. She is active in organizations dedicated to the preservation and renewal of California’s indigenous cultures. Her paintings and drawings have been exhibited world wide and her coyote drawings from News from Native California are collected in Acorn Soup, published in 1998 by Heyday Press. Like coyote, L. Frank sometimes writes backwards.] 2 Chapter 4 Ishi’s Story "Ishi's Story" could mean “the story of Ishi,” recounted by a historian or some other authority who gathers together what is known with the goal of forming a coherent, definitive picture. No such perspective is available to us, however. The story is unfinished and proliferating. My title could also mean “Ishi's own story,” told by Ishi, or on his behalf, a narration giving access to his feelings, his experience, his judgments. But we have only suggestive fragments and enormous gaps: a silence that calls forth more versions, images, endings. “Ishi’s story,” tragic and redemptive, has been told and re-told, by different people with different stakes in the telling. These interpretations in changing times are the materials for my discussion. I. Terror and Healing On August 29th, 1911, a "wild man,” so the story goes, stumbled into civilization. He was cornered by dogs at a slaughterhouse on the outskirts of Oroville, a small town in Northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11; June 2013 "I Heard Your Singing": Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe Jay Hansford C. Vest, Ph.D. Enrolled member Monacan Indian Nation Direct descendent Opechanchanough (Pamunkey) Honorary Pikuni (Blackfeet) in Ceremonial Adoption (June 1989) Professor of American Indian Studies University of North Carolina at Pembroke One University Drive (P. O. Box 1510) Pembroke, NC 28372-1510 USA. The moving and poignant story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian, has manifested itself in the film drama The Last of His Tribe (HBO Pictures/Sundance Institute, 1992). Given the long history of Hollywood's misrepresentation of Native Americans, I propose to examine this cinematic drama attending historical, ideological and cultural axioms acknowledged in the film and concomitant literature. Particular attention is given to dramatic allegorical themes manifesting historical racism, Western societal conquest, and most profoundly anthropological indifference, as well as, the historical accuracy and the ideological differences of worldview -- Western vis-à-vis Yahi -- manifest in the film. In the study of worldviews and concomitant values, there has long existed a lurking "we" - "they" proposition of otherness. Ever since the days of Plato and his Western intellectual predecessors, there has been an attempt to locate and explicate wisdom in the ethnocentric ideological notion of the "civilized" vis-à-vis the "savage." Consequently, Plato's thoughts are accorded the standing of philosophy -- the love of wisdom -- while Black Elk's words are the musings of the "primitive" and consigned to anthropology -- the science of man. Philosophy is, thusly, seen as an endeavor of "civilized" Western man whom in his "science of man" or anthropological investigation may record the "ethnometaphysics" of "primitive" or "developing" cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21: Literature: John Muir
    Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 21 Literature: John Muir John Muir's exceptional mental and physical stamina enabled him to rigorously pursue, often in solitary fashion, the exploration of California's mountains. In the Fall of 1874 and the Spring of 1875 he climbed Mt. Shasta three times. Among the entries listed in this section are Muir's pocket notebooks kept during these climbs. His 1875 notebook contains many detailed drawings of the Shasta region. In one case, on April 28, 1875, he drew from the summit of Mt. Shasta a picture depicting an approaching storm, a storm similar to the one which would two days later, on another climb of the mountain, trap him and his climbing partner Jerome Fay on the summit of Mt. Shasta. Also listed in this section are the reports of A. F. Rodgers, who had hired Muir and Fay in the Spring of 1875 to go and take summit barometric readings. Rodgers wrote a fascinating report which vividly details the appearance and condition of Muir and Fay immediately following the overnight ordeal on April 30, 1875. Muir himself wrote stories of the ordeal that were published in several sources, including Harper's Magazine in 1877 and Picturesque California in 1888. Many of Muir's other published works describe Mt. Shasta. His earliest Mt. Shasta writings were a series of five articles printed in the San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin in 1874 and 1875; these have been edited and published by Robert Engberg as part of John Muir: Summering in the Sierra (not the same book as Muir's own book My First Summer in the Sierra).
    [Show full text]
  • Hi Good Report
    CHAPTER THREE EARLIEST PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS about Harmon Augustus Good List of Documents 1 Letter from Alexander R. Barrington to William Barrington Feb. 29, 1856 2 Letter from Harmon A. Good to Governor Leland Stanford August 8, 1862 3 Harmon Good’s Newspaper Obituaries (6) May 7, 14 and May 27, 1870 4 “The Adventures of Captain Hi Good” by Dan Delaney, June 7, 1872 5 “The Kom’-bo” by Stephen Powers, 1877 6 “Indian Difficulties” by Harry L. Wells and W. L. Chambers, 1882 7 Fighting the Mill Creek Indians, Ch. XV, by Robert Anderson, 1909 8 “The Yana Indians” by Thomas Waterman, 1918, with informants William J. Seagraves (1915) & Almira (Brown) Williams (1912) 9 “The Murder of Hi Good” from The Last of the Mill Creeks by Simeon Moak, 1923 10 “The Long Concealment” from Ishi In Two Worlds by Theodora Kroeber, 1961 Document #1 -233- Figure 135. Lower Deer Creek where she divides into channels for about a one stretch mile before reuniting, while veering through Sections 22 and 27 of Tehama County’s Las- sen Township 25N, R1W (See also Fig.152 map of the same on page 266). In the far middle distance, Deer Creek can be barely seen heading to the right, in a westerly direc- tion to empty into the Sacramento River. Photo by author taken March 17, 2007. Hi Good’s former ranch location (SE ¼ of Section 33), is in the distance (far left), Alexander Robb Barrington’s former “Rio Alto Ranch” (160 acres) is in the distant middle, while Good’s sheep camp (study area, CA-TEH-2105H) is out of view in this photo, to the north (far right) about 1 ½ miles distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 Peabody Essex Museum David P
    Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 Peabody Essex Museum David P. Bradley, White Earth Ojibwe (1954 - ) Salem in History, 2006 Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 David P. Bradley, White Earth Ojibwe (1954 - ) Santa Fe, N.M. Mixed Media on Board Gift of Mr. & Mrs. James N. Krebs, 2001 E301825 H I S T O R I C A L C O N T E X T Ishi (c.1860-1916) was the last living member of the Yahi tribe, the southernmost tribe of the Yana people who inhabited northern California and the Sacramento Valley.The California gold rush and influx of foreign- ers contributed to the quick demise of the Yana tribes through conflict and disease. Apparently the last surviving Yahi, Ishi journeyed into white society, and was brought to the Museum of Anthropology in San Francisco by anthropologist Alfred Lewis Kroeber. He worked as both a janitor and as a “living exhibit,” making arrowheads in front of paying museum visitors and helping researchers record the Yana language.This survivor did not divulge information about his deceased family, however, and he did not even reveal his own name. “Ishi” means “man” in Yana. The mysterious person known as Ishi did in 1916, a victim of tuberculosis, which was foreign to the Yahi. Rumors spread that Ishi’s brain had been preserved after his death, but it wasn’t until 1999 that his pickled brain was found in a Smithsonian museum warehouse.This prompted much controversy and political debate.The Smithsonian agreed to return Ishi’s brain to surviving Native American tribes closely related to the Yahi, and it was buried with Ishi’s body in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Ishi's Brain: After an Unsettling Discovery, Anthropologists Reconsider a Legendary Friendship by Christopher Shea Lingua Franca February 2000
    The Return of Ishi's Brain: After an Unsettling Discovery, Anthropologists Reconsider a Legendary Friendship By Christopher Shea Lingua Franca February 2000 IN CALIFORNIA, EVERY SCHOOLCHILD learns the story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian. On August 29, 1911, he stumbled out of the woods in Oroville, California, 180 miles northeast of San Francisco, his hair singed black in a display of mourning. It was a shocking event: Native Americans, it was thought, had long since been driven onto reservations or onto the margins of white settlements. According to the best-known version of the Ishi story, barking dogs awakened workers at an Oroville slaughterhouse early in the morning. The butchers found a man cowering, near starvation, beside a corral leading into the building. They called the local sheriff, who handcuffed the Indian and brought him to the town jail for safekeeping. As word spread about Oroville's new resident, Northern Californians streamed into town to gawk at "the last wild Indian in North America." The Oroville officials contacted the University of California, which dispatched an anthropologist, T.T. Waterman, to the scene. He pronounced Ishi a "Stone Age man"—a sobriquet that stuck to him for life—and took him back to San Francisco by train. Waterman and his fellow anthropologists housed Ishi in a room in the university's museum and set about learning as much of his story as they could. He remained in the museum, working as a janitor and putting on the occasional flint- making show—sometimes for crowds of hundreds—until 1916, when he succumbed to tuberculosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Augustus Keeler Papers, 1858-1949
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf0290010m No online items Guide to the Charles Augustus Keeler Papers, 1858-1949 Processed by Mary Ellen Jones The Bancroft Library © 1996, 2017 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Note History --History, California --History, Bay AreaGeographical (by Place) --California --Bay AreaArts and Humanities --Literature --Poetry Guide to the Charles Augustus BANC MSS C-H 105 1 Keeler Papers, 1858-1949 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Charles Augustus Keeler Papers, creator: Keeler, Charles Augustus, 1871-1937. Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS C-H 105 Physical Description: 22.5 linear feet (12 boxes, 14 cartons, 3 volumes) Date (inclusive): 1858-1949 Abstract: Correspondence, writings, diaries, notes, and clippings concerning Keeler's literary works and his life in Berkeley. Correspondents include: William Frederic Bade, Mary Bird Clayes, Ina Donna Coolbrith, Mary Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Bernard Maybeck, C. Hart Merriam, John Muir, and August Vollmer. Language of Material: English For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Access Collection is open for research. Acquisition Information The initial gift of Charles Keeler Papers was a gift to the Library from Mrs. Merodine Keeler McIntyre and Miss Eloise Keeler, September 9, 1958. Additional materials were received from Mrs. McIntyre August 26, 1968 and March 9, 1971. A collection of six autograph poems, given to the Rare Books and Special Collections Division of the Main Library by Charles Keeler, was transferred to the Manuscripts Division in November 1961 and has been placed in the Keeler Papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Relating to the Unnaming of Kroeber Hall
    Documents relating to the unnaming of Kroeber Hall compiled by Andrew Garrett, May 2021 This is a collection of five documents created at the University of California, Berkeley in rela- tion to the unnaming of Kroeber Hall. The unnaming was proposed in 2020 and approved in 2021. In this collection are the following: 1. Pages 2-8: Proposal to Un-Name Kroeber Hall, author(s) anonymous, together with a letter of introduction and endorsment by Paul Alivisatos, Sabrina Agarwal, et al., July 1, 2020 2. Pages 9-42: Public comments (“received as of September 2, 2020”) on the Proposal to Un-Name Kroeber Hall 3. Pages 43-49: Recommendation from Building Name Review Committee to Chancellor Carol T. Christ, October 30, 2020 4. Pages 50-52: Recommendation from Chancellor Christ to President Michael Drake, November 30, 2020 5. Pages 53-54: Campus memorandum from Chancellor Christ, January 26, 2021 Documents 1-3 are from https://chancellor.berkeley.edu/task-forces/building-name-review- committee/building-name-review-kroeber-hall (accessed January 27, 2021). Document 4 was provided by the Office of the Chancellor (email, April 5, 2021). Document 5 was sent by email to the UC Berkeley campus community. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ July 1, 2020 UC Berkeley Building Name Review Committee transmitted via electronic mail to [email protected] We, the undersigned, endorse the conclusions of the July 1, 2020 Proposal to Un-name Kroeber Hall. Alfred Kroeber is not an appropriate symbol for the University of California, Berkeley or any welcoming campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For me there are several layers of “thanks with appreciation” about my learning and re- thinking the Ishi saga over time. A wide swath of territory in northern California was involved. Help I received in researching several subject areas must be addressed. There was the preliminary scholarship of Ishi’s life-story profled shortly after Ishi’s contact years (1911-1916). This layer of gratitude I extend to Thomas T. Waterman (1918b) Alfred L. Kroeber (1925) and Saxton T. Pope Sr.. (1920). Contributor in 1915 was linguist Edward Sapir who “captured his readiest language, the southernmost Yana language, christened the Yahi language. There was afterwards a hiatus of almost ffty years when Ishi, the man, was almost forgot- ten, save for Pope’s 1925 Hunting with the Bow and Arrow. In 1949, some readers heard anew about Ishi from W. H. Hutchinson’s “Ishi – The Unconquered” published in Natural History, Vol. 58. Theodora Kroeber made Ishi famous for a second time by writing. in 1961, Ishi In Two Worlds (University of California Press) and by publishing in the Book Section of the Reader’s Digest (December 1961) her condensed version of her book. I credit Theodora Kroeber for inspiring me about Ishi. That traditional California Indians could successfully “call in” to them the animals from the forest foor intrigued me. If they knew that much about the animal world, what more did they know about the Land? Promoting the Ishi story were Robert Heizer and Albert Elsasser. I acknowledge both of them for collecting, reviewing, and publishing data about Ishi that I have used.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NOV 2 O Ip
    Untttd States Department of the Interior National Park Service .- F C. fr 1 \/ ',r. National Register of Historic Places NOV 2 o ip SEP 3 0 I992i Registration Form NATIONAL REGISTER OHP Thla form to for uaa In nominating or requeetlng datarmlnatlona of eligibility for Individual propartiaa or dietrtcts. Saa Inetructton* in tor CompfcMng rVettona/ ftaofefar forma (National Register Bulletin 16). Complata aach Ham by marking "»" in tha appropriate box or by antahng tha raquaatad Information. H an rtam doaa not apply to tha proparly baing doeumantad, antar "N/A" for "not applicable." For functtone, atytee, matartalt, and areas of aignlficanca, antar onry tha catagorlaa and aubcatagoriaa liatad in tha Instructions. For additional apaoa uaa oomlnuatlon ahaatt (Form I0»800a). Typa all entries 1. Name of Property ""* hlatorlc nama Qlovne Court Hr>i-el othar names/sits number Cloyne Court 2, Location atn>et & number 2600 Ridae Road Nl^ not for publication Olft , town Berkeley jJT_ vicinity ftata coda CA oounty Alameda ood llDOOdt Claaalflcatlon Ownarahlp of Proparly Category of Proparty Numbar of Raaourota within Proparty prlvata bulldlng(a) Contributing Nonoontrlbutlng public-local district ^ bulldlngi publlc-Stata •Ita attai public-Federal atruoiura _ alructura i _ objact ,objacti .Total Nama of ralatad multlpla proptrty Hating: Numbtr of contributing raaourcaa pravlouily liatad In tha National Raglatar _. Q___ 4. Btata/Fadaril Agancy Cartlflcatlon Aa the designated authority under the National Hiatoric Preservation Act of 1066, as amended, I hereby certify that this Ol nomination CD requeat for determination of eligibility meats tha documentation atandarda for registering properties In the National Register of HiejSric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements aet forth In 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Ina Coolbrith Chit Chat Club
    La Miglior Fabbra: Ina Coolbrith and the Provenance of Bay Area Literature On April 29, 1893, Ina Coobrith, poet, writer, librarian, and doyen of San Francisco’s literary scene, traveled to the southeastern section of Oakland — to Fruitvale, an area celebrated for its cherry and apricot orchards. There she met David Lesser Lezinsky, a young poet with a passion for sociology and psychology, and Edmund Russell, a portrait painter — of fashionable society women — who preferred to wear silk robes and heeled shoes. They met to ascend the Oakland hills to visit the home of Joaquin Miller. Recognizing Russell’s being unable to walk through the countryside in what his companions characterized as “kids pumps,” Lezinsky rented a small horse and cart — and a small young driver — to transport Ina and Russell — slowly up the hill. Lezinsky and a reporter for the Stockton Evening Mail made their way on the well-trodden path to “The Hights,” Joaquin’s Miller’s compound, nested in the hills. The compound featured four whitewashed structures: one for dining, another for work and sleep, and another — for his mother. Miller reserved the fourth — and largest — structure for the gardener and to support his work tending to the landscape and especially the terraces of roses. Miller drew numerous visitors to the “Hights” — each eager to catch a glimpse of this tall man who fashioned his appearance in a manner causing him to look like Walt Whitman on steroids — but with little of the poetic muscularity of America’s “Good Grey Poet.” Joaquin Miller was one of the most famous and readily recognized poets of the West in the last quarter of the 19th century, but few admirers at that time knew that Ina Coolbrith had prompted 1 Miller to change his name — from “Cincinnatus Hiner Miller.” Miller was born c.
    [Show full text]