DOCSLIB.ORG

Reimagining Pakistan's Militia Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reimagining Pakistan's Militia Policy Atlantic Council SOUTH ASIA CENTER ISSUEBRIEF BY YELENA BIBERMAN Reimagining Pakistan’s Militia Policy APRIL 2015 If ever a turning point seemed inevitable in Atlantic Council South Asia Center Pakistan’s militia policy, it was in the aftermath of the Peshawar school massacre in December 2014. The South Asia Center serves as the Atlantic Council’s focal point for work on greater South Asia Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) killed 152 people, as well as its relations between these countries, the 133 of them children, in the bloodiest terrorist neighboring regions, Europe, and the United States. attack in Pakistan’s history.1 The carnage sparked The US-Pakistan Program was funded by the an unprecedented national dialogue about the Carnegie Corporation of New York. costs and contradictions of the Pakistani political and military establishment’s reliance on violent Pakistan’s post-Peshawar collaboration with proxies, such as the Afghan Taliban (from which Afghanistan signals a willingness to halt the the TTP originates), for security. long-standing policy of nurturing and sending Pakistani leaders vowed to take serious measures violent proxies across the border. However, this to ensure that such a tragedy would never breakthrough makes all the more conspicuous happen again. Those measures include a military the absence of a similar arrangement with India. crackdown in the tribal areas, reinstatement of the What Sharif did not include in his to-do list for death penalty, establishment of a parallel system of “the war against terrorism till the last terrorist 4 military courts to try terrorism cases, and enlisting is eliminated” is a crackdown on the anti-India the help of the Afghan army. Pakistan’s Prime militias operating with impunity on Pakistani soil. Minister Nawaz Sharif promised that his country would no longer differentiate between “good” vowed on Pakistan’s national television to take and “bad” Taliban.2 In return, Afghanistan began revengeLashkar-e-Taiba on India leader for the Hafiz Peshawar Muhammad massacre. Saeed tracking down individuals suspected by Pakistan Lashkar-e-Taiba is a leading anti-India militant of being involved in the Peshawar attack.3 group headquartered near the Pakistani city of that killed 164 people and wounded over 300. 1 “Peshawar Attack: Schools Reopen after Taliban IndianLahore. television It carried network out the 2008 NDTV Mumbai noted that attacks not Massacre,” BBC News, January 13, 2015, http://www.bbc. a single Pakistani politician condemned Saeed’s com/news/world-asia-30773120. statements.5 2 “Pakistan’s Prime Minister Promises Day of Reckoning with Militias,” Guardian, December 17, 2014, http://www. theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/17/pakistan-prime- 4 “Pakistan School Attack: PM Sharif Vows to End minister-reckoning-militants. ‘Terrorism,’” BBC News, December 17, 2014, http://www. 3 Hamid Shalizi, Jessica Donati, and Katharine Houreld, “Five bbc.com/news/world-asia-30517904. Pakistani Men Held in Afghanistan Over School Massacre: http://www.reuters. India,” NDTV, December 17, 2014, http://www.ndtv.com/ 5 “Hafiz Saeed on TV Threatens Terror Attacks against Officials,” Reuters, January 18,. 2015, . com/article/2015/01/18/us-afghanistan-pakistan- india-news/hafiz-saeed-on-tv-threatens-terror-attacks- idUSKBN0KR0DL20150118 against-india-714518 Yelena Biberman is a Visiting Assistant Professor of Government at Skidmore College and US-Pakistan Program Exchange Fellow at the Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center. What explains the persistence of Pakistan’s ideological beliefs. differentiating approach to militias in the face 8 of the Peshawar massacre? What are the costs Author Ahmed Rashid describes Pakistan as “an of playing the good-bad militia game? What can abnormal state” for using “Islamic militants— be done to end Pakistan’s dependency on armed jihadi groups, nonstate actors—in addition to nonstate groups? diplomacy and trade to pursue its defense and foreign policies.”9 Other epithets range from Conventional wisdom regarding Pakistan’s the more generous “hard” and “warrior” to security policy emphasizes the country’s the less generous “ideological,” “rentier,” and ideological and historical idiosyncrasies. However, “failing.” Pakistan was critical to the success of in doing so, it obscures rather than illuminates the US war in Afghanistan. But specialists and the strategic logic behind states’ use of militias. insiders are now warning Washington that its The enduring security dilemma underlying the relationship with Islamabad had always been Pakistan-India relationship motivates both sides based on misunderstanding and ambiguity—or, to rely on unconventional means to achieve their as Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United policy goals. Government-backed militias are likely to remain pervasive in South Asia until the broader delusions”10—rather than shared values. At the issues of regional security are addressed. heartStates of Husain the Americans’ Haqqani put misperception it, “magnificent of their Pakistani counterparts, according to the emerging Causes conventional wisdom, is the false assumption that Pakistan’s militia policy attracted considerable Pakistan is a normal country. attention in Washington when, in 2007, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) discovered that its “staunch ally” had all along been supporting the Taliban.6 With the discovery that Osama bin Laden CONVENTIONAL WISDOM had been in hiding near the country’s equivalent REGARDING PAKISTAN’S of West Point, understanding Pakistan acquired SECURITY POLICY EMPHASIZES an unprecedented sense of urgency. American THE COUNTRY’S IDEOLOGICAL strategists felt betrayed and needed answers, AND HISTORICAL which their Pakistani counterparts were unwilling to provide. What followed was a surge in expert IDIOSYNCRASIES. HOWEVER, explanations. Most of them blamed the country’s IN DOING SO, IT OBSCURES distinctive history, culture, or ideology. RATHER THAN ILLUMINATES The leading accounts of Pakistan’s betrayal have THE STRATEGIC LOGIC BEHIND pointed to the country’s “obsession” with India, STATES’ USE OF MILITIAS. insatiable geopolitical appetite, national identity crisis, powerful and opportunistic military, and weak and corrupt civilian institutions. Historian Pakistan’s history and culture are indeed distinct, Ayesha Jalal notes that a “national paranoia” is as are those of other countries. Militia sponsorship taking hold of a country that has yet to develop and diplomatic double-dealing are global, not “historical consciousness.”7 Political scientist T.V. Paul observed that, in addition to Pakistan’s proxies is a staple of unconventional warfare, strategic circumstances (i.e., the geostrategic whichPakistan-specific, has long been practices. practiced The by use countries of nonstate curse), the country suffers from a political and ranging from Great Britain and the United States military elite that based its calculations not on prudence and pragmatism, but rather on hyper-realpolitik assumptions and deeply held The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). 89 T.V.Ahmed Paul, Rashid, Pakistan on the Brink: The Future of 6 Carlotta Gall, The Wrong Enemy: America in Afghanistan, America, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (New York: Penguin 2001-2014 Books, 2013). p. 159. 10 Husain Haqqani, Magnificent Delusions: Pakistan, the United 7 Cited in Maleeha(Boston: Lodhi, Houghton Pakistan: Mifflin Beyond Harcourt, the ‘Crisis 2014), State’ States, and an Epic History of Misunderstanding (New York: (London: Hurst & Company, 2011), p. 11. PublicAffairs, 2013). 2 ATLANTIC COUNCIL Two girls head back to school in Peshawar, Pakistan, January 2015. Schools across Pakistan were closed after a December 16 attack on Peshawar’s Army Public School in which 152 people were killed. Photo credit: Reuters/Khuram Parvez. to Mozambique and Afghanistan. A recent study Pakistan’s unwillingness to crack down on counted 332 pro-government militias operating all terrorist groups is more a product of cold in nearly every region of the world between calculation than ideological shortsightedness. While the United States has been waging a war them under the aegis of a state institution.11 1982 and 2007, with at least 64 percent of and expand regional power. A retired senior US unconventional warfare as “activities conducted on terror, Pakistan has been fighting to maintain toThe enable US Special a resistance Operations movement Command or insurgency defines behind Pakistan’s use of Taliban militants: “Part to coerce, disrupt, or overthrow a government or ofcounterterrorism it was to keep the official situation summed in Afghanistan up the logic off- occupying power by operating through or with balance so that Pakistan could play a larger role in an underground, auxiliary, and guerrilla force in deciding what happened ultimately in that part of a denied area.”12 In other words, militias are a key the world . their [Pakistani strategists’] approach component of covert operations conducted below was not to rely on diplomacy or engagement as the surface of regular military and diplomatic the key way to resolve issues. Their approach was dealings. Solving the puzzle of Pakistan’s to operate using chaos as a principal weapon.”13 relationship with militias requires recognizing the banality, ubiquity, and strategic logic of violence outsourcing. When US officials requested that Pakistan restrain militarycross-border capacity. infiltration14 These by maneuvers militants, (i.e.,Pakistani “hiding 11 Sabine C. Carey,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Radical Islam: the Challenge in Pakistan & Beyond” Ambassador
    ABRIDGED TRANSCRIPT “Radical Islam: The Challenge in Pakistan & Beyond” Ambassador Husain Haqqani Pakistani Ambassador to the U.S. Jeffrey Goldberg The Atlantic April 2011 MICHAEL CROMARTIE: Our speaker is the Pakistani Ambassador to the United States. He’s the author of a highly praised academic book called Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military. He is a former journalist, but also a former academic at Boston University where he was an associate professor at the Center for International Relations. We could not have anyone both as a practitioner and as a scholar better to speak to our subject this morning than Ambassador Haqqani. AMBASSADOR HUSAIN HAQQANI: Thank you very much, Michael. Let me just start by saying that there are two or three things about Radical Islam that need to be understood and are not all widely understood in the United States. Radical Islam has to be distinguished from Islam as practiced by over a billion people. One billion Muslims are not radical, and that needs to be understood, nor have many of the things that are associated with Radical Islam been part of normal Muslim practice for 1,400 years. There is a tendency in the United States these days to try and sort of link things that are happening in the modern times to things that happened in the medieval times, ignoring the fact that in the medieval times whether you were Christian or Muslim, you behaved a certain way which you do not do in the modern times. The Radical Islam phenomenon has to be understood in its actual context, which is political and not religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Terrorism Dilemma
    14 HUSAIN HAQQANI Pakistan’s Terrorism Dilemma For more than a decade, Pakistan has been accused of sup- porting terrorism, primarily due to its support for militants opposing Indian rule in the disputed Himalayan territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Until September 11, 2001, Islamabad was also the principal backer of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. Although Pakistan has now become a key U.S. ally in the war against terrorism, it is still seen both as a target and staging ground for terrorism. General Pervez Musharraf ’s military regime abandoned its alliance with the Taliban immediately after the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. U.S. forces were allowed the use of Pakistani air bases for operations in Afghanistan. Pakistani intelligence services provided, and continue to provide, valuable information in hunting down Taliban and al-Qaeda escapees. The Pakistani military is cur- rently working with U.S. law enforcement officials in tracking down terrorists in the lawless tribal areas bordering Afghanistan. In a major policy speech on January 12, 2002, Musharraf announced measures to limit the influence of Islamic militants at home, including those previously described by him as “Kashmiri free- dom fighters.” “No organizations will be able to carry out terrorism 351 352 HUSAIN HAQQANI on the pretext of Kashmir,” he declared. “Whoever is involved with such acts in the future will be dealt with strongly whether they come from inside or outside the country.”1 Musharraf ’s supporters declared his speech as revolutionary.2 He echoed the sentiment of most Pakistanis when he said, “violence and terrorism have been going on for years and we are weary and sick of this Kalashnikov culture … The day of reckoning has come.” After the speech, the Musharraf regime clamped down on domes- tic terrorist groups responsible for sectarian killings.3 But there is still considerable ambivalence in Pakistan’s attitude toward the Kashmiri militants.
    [Show full text]
  • The War of Ideas for the Muslim World
    Event Transcript “T HE WAR OF IDEAS FOR THE MUSLIM WORLD ” With HUSAIN HAQQANI Visiting Scholar, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace & Co-chair, Project on Islam and Democracy, Hudson Institute The following is an edited transcript of an event sponsored by Hudson Institute’s Center on Islam, Democracy, and the Future of the Muslim World on October 22, 2004. The center, which is directed by Hudson senior fellow Dr. Hillel Fradkin, was established in 2004 to research and analyze the ideological dimension of Islamism and radical Islam, and to encourage and support the development of moderate and democratic alternatives within the Muslim world. This event was the first in a series of lectures sponsored by the center’s Project on Islam and Democracy. HILLEL FRADKIN: Good afternoon. I’d like to welcome you to Hudson Institute. I'm Hillel Fradkin, the director of Hudson Institute’s Center on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World. That's a mouthful. Before putting you in the able hands of our speaker, I wanted to say a couple of things about this center and how it provides the context for today’s talk. The center has a variety of concerns and a variety of projects that stem—it will surprise no one— from the events of 9/11 and the policy issues for America, both abroad and at home. One of the most important of the center’s projects is a project on Islam and Democracy. It is concerned with what has been called “The War of Ideas.” I’ll say in passing, I think there’s actually several of such wars—that is, there are several wars of ideas going on at the present, or should be going on at present.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Pakistan's Internal Dynamics
    the national bureau of asian research nbr special report #55 | february 2016 mapping pakistan’s internal dynamics Implications for State Stability and Regional Security By Mumtaz Ahmad, Dipankar Banerjee, Aryaman Bhatnagar, C. Christine Fair, Vanda Felbab-Brown, Husain Haqqani, Mahin Karim, Tariq A. Karim, Vivek Katju, C. Raja Mohan, Matthew J. Nelson, and Jayadeva Ranade cover 2 NBR Board of Directors Charles W. Brady George Davidson Tom Robertson (Chairman) Vice Chairman, M&A, Asia-Pacific Vice President and Chairman Emeritus HSBC Holdings plc Deputy General Counsel Invesco LLC Microsoft Corporation Norman D. Dicks John V. Rindlaub Senior Policy Advisor Gordon Smith (Vice Chairman and Treasurer) Van Ness Feldman LLP Chief Operating Officer President, Asia Pacific Exact Staff, Inc. Wells Fargo Richard J. Ellings President Scott Stoll George F. Russell Jr. NBR Partner (Chairman Emeritus) Ernst & Young LLP Chairman Emeritus R. Michael Gadbaw Russell Investments Distinguished Visiting Fellow David K.Y. Tang Institute of International Economic Law, Managing Partner, Asia Karan Bhatia Georgetown University Law Center K&L Gates LLP Vice President & Senior Counsel International Law & Policy Ryo Kubota Tadataka Yamada General Electric Chairman, President, and CEO Venture Partner Acucela Inc. Frazier Healthcare Dennis Blair Chairman Melody Meyer President Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Honorary Directors U.S. Navy (Ret.) Chevron Asia Pacific Exploration and Production Company Maria Livanos Cattaui Chevron Corporation Lawrence W. Clarkson Secretary General (Ret.) Senior Vice President International Chamber of Commerce Pamela S. Passman The Boeing Company (Ret.) President and CEO William M. Colton Center for Responsible Enterprise Thomas E. Fisher Vice President and Trade (CREATe) Senior Vice President Corporate Strategic Planning Unocal Corporation (Ret.) Exxon Mobil Corporation C.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Headlines June 29, 2011 Washington, DC Husain
    Beyond the Headlines June 29, 2011 Washington, DC Husain Haqqani Ambassador of Pakistan to the US Karen DeYoung Associate Editor, The Washington Post A Conversation on US-Pakistani Relations Patricia Ellis: Good evening everyone and welcome. I’m Patricia Ellis, President of the Women’s Foreign Policy Group. We promote women’s leadership and women’s voices on pressing international issues of the day, such as our topic for tonight, US-Pakistan relations. On behalf of the WFPG and our board members who are present tonight—Dawn Calabia, Gail Kitch, Donna Constantinople and Theresa Loar—I want to welcome everybody here. We’re so glad that you could join us for this [Beyond] the Headlines event—these are events on hot issues in the news. And recently we’ve done events on Egypt, Libya, women in the Middle East, and our event tonight is with Ambassador Husain Haqqani, the Pakistani Ambassador to the US, who will be joined by our friend and frequent speaker and moderator, Washington Post senior national security correspondent Karen DeYoung, for a conversation on US-Pakistan relations. The event could not be more timely, as we all know, given the increased tensions in the relationship between the two countries following the killing of Osama Bin Laden. We’re so pleased to have the Ambassador with us tonight to explore the complexities and the importance of this relationship, and extremely lucky to have Karen back. I want to recognize a few guests who are here with us tonight: Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy, Judith McHale [Applause], Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, Deborah McCarthy [Applause], members of our Corporate Advisory Council, and of course our many ambassadors and diplomatic colleagues, who we work very closely with throughout the years on our embassy events.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends, Foes, and Future Directions: U.S. Partnerships in a Turbulent World: Strategic Rethink
    STRATEGIC RETHINK FRIENDS, FOES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS U.S. Partnerships in a Turbulent World Hans Binnendijk C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1210 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9220-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report is the third in a series of volumes in which RAND explores the elements of a national strategy for the conduct of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE: “Magnificent Delusions: Pakistan, the United States and an Epic History of Misunderstanding”*
    LECTURE: “Magnificent Delusions: Pakistan, the United States and an Epic History of Misunderstanding”* Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Director of the Center of International Relations, and Professor of the Practice of International Relations at Boston University. October 25th, 2013, 5 p.m., Marshall Building, room 490. Bio Sketch: Husain Haqqani is a Pakistani scholar and public figure who most recently served as Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States from 2008-2011. He is widely credited with managing a difficult partnership during a critical phase in the global war on terrorism. Haqqani started his public life as an Islamist student leader and has, over the years, emerged as a strong voice for democracy and civilian control of the military in Pakistan and an exponent of liberal values in the Muslim world. His distinguished career in government includes serving as an advisor to three Pakistani Prime ministers, including Benazir Bhutto, who described him as a loyal friend in her last book ‘Reconciliation.’ He also served as Pakistan’s Ambassador to Sri Lanka in 1992-93. Ambassador Haqqani is the author of the book ‘Pakistan between Mosque and Military’ and hundreds of articles published in major international newspapers, magazines and scholarly journals. He is currently Senior Fellow and Director for South and Central Asia at the Hudson Institute. Haqqani also co-edits the journal ‘Current Trends in Islamist Ideology’ published by Hudson Institute’s Center for Islam, Democracy and Future of the Muslim World. *Sponsored by the: School of Sociology, School of Government and Public Policy, Confluencecenter for Creative Inquiry, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Department of History, School of Geography and Development, and the School of Middle Eastern and North African Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Pakistan-Afghanistan Stalemate
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Barnett R. Rubin and Abubakar Siddique The United States Institute of Peace has been working on the stabilization and reconstruction of Afghanistan since 2002. Institute initiatives focus on security, the rule of law, conflict resolution, building civil society, and education in Afghanistan and Afghanistan’s relations with its neighbors. The Institute’s Afghanistan Working Group, chaired by Dr. Barnett R. Rubin, is composed of government officials Resolving the Pakistan- and nongovernmental organizations that discuss critical issues facing Afghanistan with top experts and policymakers and work directly to help the Afghan people build a peaceful and prosperous society. Afghanistan Stalemate The idea for this report started with discussions by Barnett Rubin with delegates to the Afghan constitutional Loya Jirga, President Hamid Karzai, and journalist Ahmed Rashid in December 2003. In spring and summer 2004 Abubakar Siddique conducted field work on the current positions of the diverse stakeholders in this complex region. During subsequent trips the coauthors carried out additional research, most recently in July–August 2006, when Rubin visited Afghanistan and Siddique visited Pakistan. Grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the Royal Government of Norway, and the Government of the United Kingdom supported the research. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Afrasiab Khattak and Ahmed Rashid in Pakistan and Omar Zakhilwal, Rasul Amin, Hamed Wardak, and Humayun Hamidzada in Afghanistan. They also thank many anonymous informants and commentators from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Endowment Update:Endowment
    Hudson Institute “Hudson Institute is one of America’s foremost policy re- search centers, known and respected around the globe, a leader in innovative thinking and creative solutions for the challenges of the present and the future.” – Henry Kissinger PROSPECTUS / 2007 table of contents Why You Should Support Hudson Institute ..................2 A Letter from Chairman Allan R. Tessler An Overview of Hudson’s Impact ...........................3 Mission Statement ..........................................4 About Hudson Institute .....................................5 A Think Tank with a Presence in Washington and New York ..............................................6 How We Succeed ..........................................7 Research and Commentary Media Appearances Events and International Conferences Congressional Testimony Briefings Hudsonians in Government Service Major Accomplishments ...................................12 Current Areas of Research .................................18 Sources of Revenue and Breakdown of Expenses............19 Hudson Leadership and Trustees ...........................20 HUDSON INSTITUTE why you should support hudson institute A Letter from Chairman Allan R. Tessler As Chairman of the Board of Hudson Institute, I would like to explain why Hudson is a unique organization—and why it deserves your financial support. For four-and-one-half decades, Hudson has provided original, cutting-edge research on critical policy issues to an impressive, international array of policymakers and opinion leaders. During
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Barriers to Dismantling the Militant Infrastructure in Pakistan
    [PEACEW RKS [ DOMESTIC BARRIERS TO DISMANTLING THE MILITANT INFRASTRUCTURE IN PAKISTAN Stephen Tankel ABOUT THE REPORT This report, sponsored by the U.S. Institute of Peace, examines several underexplored barriers to dismantling Pakistan’s militant infrastructure as a way to inform the understandable, but thus far ineffectual, calls for the coun- try to do more against militancy. It is based on interviews conducted in Pakistan and Washington, DC, as well as on primary and secondary source material collected via field and desk-based research. AUTHOR’S NOTE:This report was drafted before the May 2013 elections and updated soon after. There have been important developments since then, including actions Islamabad and Washington have taken that this report recommends. Specifically, the U.S. announced plans for a resumption of the Strategic Dialogue and the Pakistani government reportedly developed a new counterterrorism strategy. Meanwhile, the situation on the ground in Pakistan continues to evolve. It is almost inevitable that discrete ele- ments of this report of will be overtaken by events. Yet the broader trends and the significant, endogenous obstacles to countering militancy and dismantling the militant infrastruc- ture in Pakistan unfortunately are likely to remain in place for some time. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Stephen Tankel is an assistant professor at American University, nonresident scholar in the South Asia program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and author of Storming the World Stage: The Story of Lashkar- e-Taiba. He has conducted field research on conflicts and militancy in Algeria, Bangladesh, India, Lebanon, Pakistan, and the Balkans. Professor Tankel is a frequent media commentator and adviser to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan After America's Withdrawal
    Afghanistan After America’s Withdrawal FDD Featuring Amb. Husain Haqqani, David Kilcullen, and Bill Roggio Moderated by Nancy Youssef EVENTS Introduction by Clifford D. May MAY: Hello and thanks for joining us. I’m Cliff May, FDD’s Founder and President. Today’s discussion comes at a critical moment. The withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Afghanistan is proceeding rapidly – without much attention to the likely consequences. As my colleagues at FDD’s Long War Journal have meticulously reported: In the past week alone, the Taliban have taken control of at least 10 district centers in four different regions of Afghanistan. I argue in my most recent column that the odds that the Afghan government will survive without American air support, intelligence, training, and other assistance are not good. I quote General H.R. McMaster who recently said he was puzzled by how many Americans have fallen for the delusion “that wars end when we leave – as if the Taliban will look around [and say]: ‘Hey, the Americans are gone. Let’s just stop fighting!’” I quote also Leon Panetta who has noted that if we abandon to the tender mercies of the Taliban those who have struggled alongside us, in particular, Afghan translators, “that sends a terrible message” to both our allies and our adversaries. You’ll find my column on FDD’s website, among other outlets. We have an expert panel with us today to discuss what’s happening and likely to happen in Afghanistan, and its ramifications for Afghans and for Americans. Husain Haqqani is a senior fellow and director for South and Central Asia at Hudson Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcing Aid Conditions Without Cutting Ties
    A New U.S. Approach to Pakistan: Enforcing Aid Conditions Without Cutting Ties Husain Haqqani, Hudson Institute February 2017 Lisa Curtis, The Heritage Foundation Briefing Paper A New U.S. Approach to Pakistan: Enforcing Aid Conditions without Cutting Ties Husain Haqqani Director for South and Central Asia Hudson Institute Lisa Curtis Senior Research Fellow, Asian Studies Center The Heritage Foundation © 2017 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Preface 3 Background 5 Policy Recommendations 9 Conclusion 13 Acknowledgements 15 A New U.S. Approach to Pakistan Preface he new Trump Administration must review its policies toward Pakistan in order to more effectively contain, and eventually eliminate, the terrorist threats that T continue to emanate from the country. The activities and operations of diverse terror groups on and from Pakistani soil, and the government's failure to rein them in, threaten vital U.S.
    [Show full text]