Isolationism, Populism, and Infectious Disease: of Particular Concern for the Future of International Public Health

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Isolationism, Populism, and Infectious Disease: of Particular Concern for the Future of International Public Health Journal of Infection and Public Health 11 (2018) 444–445 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Infection and Public Health j ournal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jiph Letter to the Editor Isolationism, populism, and infectious disease: Of particular concern for the future of international public health Uncertainty over international emergency efforts to combat global infectious disease threats are the tweets response under the Trump regime made by Trump when two US aid workers, physician Kent Brantly and nurse Nancy Writebol, contracted Ebola in Liberia [20]. Out- I am a rock, lined below are three of his most infamous tweets on this issue: I am an island. “Ebola patient will be brought to the U.S. in a few days – now I I’ve built walls, know for sure that our leaders are incompetent. KEEP THEM OUT A fortress, steep and mighty, OF HERE!” That none may penetrate. [1] “Stop the EBOLA patients from entering the U.S. Treat them, at Recent electoral and referendum decisions in both the United the highest level, over there. THE UNITED STATES HAS ENOUGH States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have brought PROBLEMS!” into sharp focus a growing resistance to an international orienta- tion among an increasing number of states. A dramatic example “The U.S. cannot allow EBOLA infected people back. People that of this can be seen in the result of the so-called ‘Brexit’ refer- go to far away places to help out are great-but must suffer the endum decision in the United Kingdom (UK) that will ensure its consequences!” [21] departure from the European Union. Nationalism and racism were It was presumably in response to such comments that Samantha undoubtedly crucial elements fueling the outcome of this populist Power, former US ambassador to the UN, stated in a recent inter- vote [2]. A similar example of successful marketing of isolation- view “I would worry, in the face of an epidemic like Ebola, that ism and nationalism can be seen in the electoral triumph of Donald there would be a knee-jerk ‘let’s close our borders, let the people Trump to the presidency of the United States of America. Trump’s of West Africa tend to themselves” [22]. The Trump administration campaign was based on a particularly potent mixture of grassroots does not appear to understand that disease anywhere is a threat to xenophobia and nostalgia [3]. Trump’s campaign identified Mexi- health everywhere. can immigrants as criminals and rapists and focused on promising The insular xenophobic nationalism demonstrated by the new to build a wall (“Build The Wall”) to protect an America that he sug- US government provides an almost perfect antithesis to fundamen- gested would once again be a great country (“Make America Great tal philosophies in Public Health. This approach, combined with the Again”) [4–6]. Trump regime’s apparent lack of a moral compass [23], its disregard These incidents are far from being isolated events. In France for objective reality [24–26], and propensity toward erratic knee- the far right is gaining significant ground under the leadership of jerk responses [16–18,21], seriously endangers future international Marine Le Pen who espouses blatant Islamophobia [7]. Similar racist cooperative public health efforts. ideologies are being promulgated in the Netherlands and Denmark with growing populist electoral success [8,9]. Funding The impact of this growing racist insularity on international efforts to control potential infectious disease epidemics may be No funding sources. considerable. It should be acknowledged that the US was cru- cially involved in international efforts to control the recent Ebola Competing interests outbreak in West Africa [10–13]. However, Trump’s nationalist and isolationist agenda will undoubtedly undermine, if not erad- None declared. icate, US commitment to future participation in combatting such outbreaks (“America First”). It must be acknowledged that future international cooperation involving the US seems to be in jeop- Ethical approval ardy in a range of arenas. For example, the Trump administration has consistently attacked international organizations such as the Not required. United Nations (UN) [14,15]. Trump’s hastily implemented Muslim Ban, which denied access References to the US to citizens from seven Muslim countries (Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Iraq) demonstrates the new [1] Lines from the song I Am A. Rock Paul Simon and Art Garfunkle fromthe 1966 album Sounds of Silence. regimes defensive and blinkered thinking [16–18]. Interestingly, [2] Chakraborty A. After a campaign scarred by bigotry, it’s become OK to be racist although this executive order was quickly overturned, it has since in Britain. The Guardian 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/ been followed by a similar ban, this time targeted at six of the orig- jun/29/frenzy-hatred-brexit-racism-abuse-referendum-celebratory-lasting- damage. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. inal seven countries identified in the first ban (Iraq is no longer [3] The Observer. The Observer view on bullying, aggressive, nationalist Don- included in the list) [19]. ald Trump. The Observer 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.07.011 1876-0341/© 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Letter to the Editor / Journal of Infection and Public Health 11 (2018) 444–445 445 2017/jan/22/observer-view-donald-trump-inauguration. [Accessed 11 March [18] Houghton F. Learning from the ‘Muslim ban’: implications of the Trump presi- 2017]. dency for international public health. N Z Med J 2017;130(1451). [4] Jacobs B. Trump says Mexico ‘rapist’ comments were planned in deposition [19] Kaleem J. Six states are challenging Trump’s travel ban in court. Los Angeles video. The Guardian 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/ Times 2017. http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential- 30/trump-comments-mexico-rapists-planned-deposition-video. [Accessed 11 washington-updates-washington-new-york-states-will-take-1489088278- March 2017]. htmlstory.html. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. [5] Glenza J. US is paying for border wall because Mexico will pay ‘later’, Trump [20] Achenbach J, Dennis B, Hogan C. American doctor infected with Ebola says. The Guardian 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/ returns to U.S. The Washington Post 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ 06/donald-trump-mexico-border-wall-congress-america-pay. [Accessed 11 national/health-science/us-confirms-2-americans-with-ebola-coming-home- March 2017]. for-treatment/2014/08/01/c20a27cc-1995-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265 story. [6] McCarthy T. Can Trump really make America great again? The Guardian 2017. html?utm term=.abc1fcc618a7. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/17/donald-trump-america- [21] Bernstein L. Trump wanted to keep Americans critically ill with Ebola out great-again-northampton-county-pennsylvania. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. of the U.S. The Washington Post 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ [7] Slawson N. Marine Le Pen leads gathering of EU far-right leaders in Koblenz. The news/to-your-health/wp/2016/08/24/trump-wanted-to-deny-u-s-care-to- Guardian 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/17/donald- americans-critically-ill-with-ebola/?utm term=.9f879694b4f0. [Accessed 11 trump-america-great-again-northampton-county-pennsylvania. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. March 2017]. [22] RTE. Samantha power on challenges presented by ethnic conflicts to [8] Graham-Harrison E. Progressive Muslims take on rightwards shift in Dutch pol- the UN. RTE; 2017. https://www.google.com/amp/www.rte.ie/amp/848520/ itics. The Observer 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/29/ ?client=safari. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. dutch-muslims-mark-rutte-geert-wilders-netherlands. [Accessed 11 March [23] Johnson J. Trump says ‘torture works,’ backs waterboarding and ‘much worse’. 2017]. The Washington Post 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ [9] Zucchino D. ‘I’ve become a racist’: migrant wave unleashes Danish tensions over trump-says-torture-works-backs-waterboarding-and-much-worse/2016/ identity. New York Times 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/06/world/ 02/17/4c9277be-d59c-11e5-b195-2e29a4e13425 story.html?tid=a inl&utm europe/denmark-migrants-refugees-racism.html? r=0. [Accessed 11 March term=.2f848e066e24. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. 2017]. [24] Hunt E. Trump’s inauguration crowd: Sean Spicer’s claims versus the evi- [10] Frieden TR, Damen IK. Ebola in West Africa—CDC’s role in epidemic detection, dence. The Guardian 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/ control, and prevention. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;22(11). jan/22/trump-inauguration-crowd-sean-spicers-claims-versus-the-evidence. [11] U.S. Department of Defense. DOD helps fight ebola in Liberia and West Africa. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. U.S. Department of Defense; 2017. http://archive.defense.gov/home/features/ [25] Topping A. ‘Sweden, who would believe this?’: Trump cites non-existent ter- 2014/1014 ebola/. [Accessed 11 March 2017]. ror attack. The Guardian 2017 [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/ [12] The White House Office of the Press Secretary. Fact sheet: U.S. response to feb/19/sweden-trump-cites-non-existent-terror-attack. [Accessed 11 March the ebola epidemic in West Africa. The White House Office of the Press Secre- 2017]. tary; 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/ [26] Schmidt S, Bever L. Kellyanne Conway cites ‘Bowling Green massacre’ that 16/fact-sheet-us-response-ebola-epidemic-west-africa. [Accessed 11 March never happened to defend travel ban.
Recommended publications
  • Day-By-Day Digest of President Trump's 100 Days of Failure
    Day-By-Day Digest Of President Trump’s 100 Days of Failure Friday, April 21, 2017: Trump Signs Executive Order Signaling Further Deregulation Of Banking Industry Thursday, April 20, 2017: Another Person Dies In Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Custody Thursday, April 20, 2017: Investigation Of Trump's Luxury Properties Reveals Vast Potential To Buy Influence Over The President Wednesday, April 19, 2017: Headed By Trump Appointee, The FCC Weakens Internet Regulations In Favor Of Telecommunications Industry Tuesday, April 18, 2017: Trump Administration Admits It Expelled DREAMer Who grew Up In America Despite His Protected Status Tuesday, April 18, 2017: Trump Congratulates The President Of Turkey On Winning What Democracy Watchers Are Condemning As A Power Grab Tuesday, April 18, 2017: Trump Mixes Up The Current Leader Of North Korea With The Country's Past Leaders Monday, April 17, 2017: Flouting The Public's Demands, The White House Reiterates Trump's Refusal To Disclose His Tax Returns Saturday, April 15, 2017: Circumventing Ethics Rules, Trump Fills His White House With More Former Lobbyists And Industry Operatives Friday, April 14, 2017: Trump White House Shrouds Itself In Secrecy, Refuses To Release Visitor Logs To The Public Friday, April 14, 2017: Trump's Justice Department Uses Fake Repeal Of Anti-LGBT Bill To Further Turn Its Back On The Transgender Community Thursday, April 13, 2017: Trump Signs Bill Emboldening States To Discriminate Against Women's Healthcare Providers Like Planned Parenthood Thursday,
    [Show full text]
  • Debating the Research Agenda Around Fake News. Presented at the 2018 This Is Not a Fake Conference!, 5 June 2018, London, UK
    BAXTER, G. and MARCELLA, R. 2018. Debating the research agenda around fake news. Presented at the 2018 This is not a fake conference!, 5 June 2018, London, UK. Debating the research agenda around fake news. BAXTER, G., MARCELLA, R. 2018 This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk Information Search Engagement and ‘Fake News’ Debating the research agenda around ‘Fake News’ Rita Marcella and Graeme Baxter School of Creative and Cultural Business Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen ‘Post-Truth’: Oxford Dictionaries International Word of the Year 2016 First attributed to Steve Tesich in 1992, describing US Government’s involvement in Watergate, the Iran- Contra affair, and the First Gulf War Much of its use in 2016 related to the UK’s EU membership referendum (‘Brexit’) and the US presidential campaign ‘Fake news’ and ‘alternative facts’ now widely used terms (‘fake news’ was Collins Dictionary’s 2017 word of the year) Research perspectives Economics - Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 31(2), 211-36. Media Studies - Borden, S. L., & Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from “fake” news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics , 22(4), 300-314. Communications - Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity”. Journal of Communication Inquiry , 36(3), 246-262. Computer Science - Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L., & Chen, Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 52(1), 1-4.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Lawyers in Government Beyond the Representation Role
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2019 Regulation of Lawyers in Government Beyond the Representation Role Ellen Yaroshefsky Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ellen Yaroshefsky, Regulation of Lawyers in Government Beyond the Representation Role, 33 NOTRE DAME J. L. ETHICS & PUB. POL’Y 151 (2019) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/1257 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGULATION OF LAWYERS IN GOVERNMENT BEYOND THE CLIENT REPRESENTATION ROLE ELLEN YAROSHEFSKY* INTRODUCTION In February 2017, fifteen legal ethicists filed a complaint against Kellyanne Conway, Senior Counselor to the President,' alleging that a number of her pub- lic statements were intentional misrepresentations. The complaint filed in the District of Columbia, one of the two jurisdictions where Ms. Conway is admitted to practice, acknowledged that there are limited circumstances in which lawyers who do not act in a representational capacity are, and should be, subject to the anti-deceit disciplinary rules.2 The complaint stated: As Rule 8.4(c) states, "It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to [elngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation." This is an admittedly broad rule, as it includes conduct outside the practice of law and, unlike 8.4(b), the conduct need not be criminal.
    [Show full text]
  • What's a 'Covfefe'? Trump Tweet Unites a Bewildered Nation
    POLITICS What’s a ‘Covfefe’? Trump Tweet Unites a Bewildered Nation By MATT FLEGENHEIMER MAY 31, 2017 open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com An image of President Trump’s Twitter account. “Despite the constant negative press covfefe,” the post began, at 12:06 a.m. And there it ended. WASHINGTON — And on the 132nd day, just after midnight, President Trump had at last delivered the nation to something approaching unity — in bewilderment, if nothing else. The state of our union was … covfefe. The trouble began, as it so often does, on Twitter, in the early minutes of Wednesday morning. Mr. Trump had something to say. Kind of. “Despite the constant negative press covfefe,” the Twitter post began, at open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com 12:06 a.m., from @realDonaldTrump, the irrepressible internal monologue of his presidency. And that was that. A minute passed. Then another. Then five. Surely he would delete the message. Ten. Twenty. It was nearly 12:30 a.m. Forty minutes. An hour. The questions mounted. Had the president’s lawyers, so eager to curb his stream-of-consciousness missives, tackled the commander in chief under the cover of night? Perhaps, some worried aloud, Mr. Trump had experienced a medical episode a quarter of the way through his 140 characters. Or maybe he had simply gazed upon his work, paused and thought: “Yes. Nailed it.” No one at the White House could immediately be reached for comment open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Experts Say Conway May Have Broken Ethics Rule by Touting Ivanka Trump'
    From: Tyler Countie To: Contact OGE Subject: Violation of Government Ethics Question Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:26:19 AM Hello, I was wondering if the following tweet would constitute a violation of US Government ethics: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/829356871848951809 How can the President of the United States put pressure on a company for no longer selling his daughter's things? In text it says: Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by @Nordstrom. She is a great person -- always pushing me to do the right thing! Terrible! 10:51am · 8 Feb 2017 · Twitter for iPhone Have a good day, Tyler From: Russell R. To: Contact OGE Subject: Trump"s message to Nordstrom Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 1:03:26 PM What exactly does your office do if it's not investigating ethics issues? Did you even see Trump's Tweet about Nordstrom (in regards to his DAUGHTER'S clothing line)? Not to be rude, but the president seems to have more conflicts of interest than someone who has a lot of conflicts of interests. Yeah, our GREAT leader worrying about his daughters CLOTHING LINE being dropped, while people are dying from other issues not being addressed all over the country. Maybe she should go into politics so she can complain for herself since government officials can do that. How about at least doing your jobs, instead of not?!?!? Ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess it's just easier to do nothing, huh? Sincerely, Russell R. From: Mike Ahlquist To: Contact OGE Cc: Mike Ahlquist Subject: White House Ethics Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 1:23:01 PM Is it Ethical and or Legal for the Executive Branch to be conducting Family Business through Government channels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics Resistance
    The Ethics Resistance BRIAN SHEPPARD* ABSTRACT Legal ethics complaints have been ®led against several of the high-ranking lawyers in the Trump Administration, often in their home states. While individ- ual complaints have caught the public eye, the collective movement to use legal ethics to resist Trumpism has escaped attention. This is not altogether surpris- ing: legal ethics rules have not historically been an attractive tool for political change. Perhaps, desperate times have called for desperate measures. This ªEthics Resistanceº will face signi®cant opposing forces. Legal ethics complaints seldom result in punishment. Further, the agencies that are asked to investigate these high-pro®le and controversial matters will not be eager to leave their comfort zones; they are accustomed to complaints from clients who are unhappy with their lawyers over straightforward matters like unreturned phone calls or high fees. There will also be loud dissenting voices from those who will see the movement as the weaponization of a tool designed for the mod- est task of lawyer self-governance. Finally, the complaints will have to navigate between powerful constitutional protections regarding lawyer speech and fed- eral power. But we should not dismiss this movement simply because it is unusual or challenging. The wisdom of the Ethics Resistance can only be judged after we understand its distinctive qualities and consider how they further or hinder our legal, institutional, and pragmatic interests. In this Article, I undertake that analysis and conclude that the movement has the capacity to be legally permissible, institutionally sound, and prudent. I fur- ther offer a list of best practices for future complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.0 Introduction to Forever War
    2 Labyrinth: Forever War 14.0 Introduction toForever War Labyrinth: The Forever War, 2015 - ? is a 1-2 player card-driven boardgame simulating at the strategic level the ongoing bid by Islamist extremists to impose their brand of religious rule on the Muslim world. It continues where Labyrinth: Awakening, 2010 - ? left off and adds new event cards and rules to cover the last five T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S years of history. Since publication of Labyrinth and its first ex- Game Component List ............................................................... 2 pansion, Labyrinth: Awakening, fans of the game have expressed Credits ........................................................................................ 2 a desire to update it based on more recent events, and a variety 14.0 Introduction to Forever War ............................................ 2 of event card ideas and variants have been freely shared online. 15.0 What’s Changed? ............................................................. 2 This second expansion to the Labyrinth game series fulfills that 16.0 Solitaire Play .................................................................... 4 continuing interest by providing up-to-date event cards and allows Scenarios .................................................................................... 5 the game to continue to serve as an effective strategic level model of the ongoing struggles in the Muslim world. First Time into the Maze: Beginner Strategy in Lab: Awk ......... 10 Designer’s Notes .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENEMY CONSTRUCTION and the PRESS Ronnell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun†
    ENEMY CONSTRUCTION AND THE PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun† ABSTRACT When the President of the United States declared recently that the press is “the enemy,” it set off a firestorm of criticism from defenders of the institutional media and champions of the press’s role in the democracy. But even these Trump critics have mostly failed to appreciate the wider ramifications of the President’s narrative choice. Our earlier work describes the process of governmental “enemy construction,” by which officials use war rhetoric and other signaling behaviors to convey that a person or institution is not merely an institution that, although wholly legitimate, has engaged in behaviors that are disappointing or disapproved, but instead an illegitimate “enemy” triggering a state of Schmittian exceptionalism and justifying the compromise of ordinarily recognized liberties. The Trump administration, with a rhetoric that began during the campaign and burgeoned in the earliest days of Donald Trump’s presidency, has engaged in enemy construction of the press, and the risks that accompany that categorization are grave. This article examines the fuller components of that enemy construction, beyond the overt use of the label. It offers insights into the social, technological, legal, and political realities that make the press ripe for enemy construction in a way that would have been unthinkable a generation ago. It then explores the potential motivations for and consequences of enemy construction. We argue that enemy construction is particularly alarming when the press, rather than some other entity, is the constructed enemy. Undercutting the watchdog, educator, and proxy functions of the press through enemy construction leaves the administration more capable of delegitimizing other institutions and constructing other enemies—including the judiciary, the intelligence community, immigrants, and members of certain races or religions—because the viability and traction of counter-narrative is so greatly diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • Law As Minor Jurisprudence: Is It a Mistake? Genevieve Renard Painter Concordia University, Canada
    Law Text Culture Volume 21 Law as ... Minor Jurisprudence in Article 13 Historical Key 2017 Law as Minor Jurisprudence: Is it a Mistake? Genevieve Renard Painter Concordia University, Canada Follow this and additional works at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc Recommended Citation Painter, Genevieve Renard, Law as Minor Jurisprudence: Is it a Mistake?, Law Text Culture, 21, 2017, 276-300. Available at:http://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc/vol21/iss1/13 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Law as Minor Jurisprudence: Is it a Mistake? Abstract What is law as minor jurisprudence? Existing scholarship around the concept of minor jurisprudence associates it with processes that start something, found something, or stand outside something and, further, with processes that conceal or erase. To seek to clarify the meaning and effect of the phrase ‘“law as” … minor jurisprudence’, I consider cases of mistake that, as legal speech acts, transform a state of affairs. In Part I, I use JL Austin’s theory about speech acts to analyse how speech can be mistaken and how such mistakes may transform states of affairs, using cases of encounters between Indigenous, settler, and international legal orders. In Part II, I survey the debut of the Trump administration as a possible site of minor jurisprudence. Informed by this study of mistakes that help make minor jurisprudence, my investigation suggests that: 1) minor jurisprudence requires major jurisprudence to be cognizable; 2) little intrinsic to the concept of minor jurisprudence offers normative guidance; and 3) the idea of law as minor jurisprudence may be a mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Facts’: How the Fake News Pandemic Is Killing Media As We Know It
    BBC School Report ‘ALTERNATIVE FACTS’: HOW THE FAKE NEWS PANDEMIC IS KILLING MEDIA AS WE KNOW IT On January 22nd, 2017, the controversial days Kellyanne Conway was found discussing the term ‘alternative facts’ was born. Coined by make-believe massacre in two other interviews Kellyanne Conway, the Counselor to United just days beforehand. Whether Conway was simp- States, it was used to defend the White ly lying or indeed did mix up her words is un- known, however both are equally alarming, dis- House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s blatantly playing either a deceitful sentiment or a lack of false claim about the attendance to Trump’s willingness to double check on what they are presidential inauguration. It was just one preaching. more battle in the apparent war against the truth. However, as fun as it is to witch-hunt one of the most powerful authorities in the world for their Conway’s ‘alternative fact’ phrase rapidly went flaws and blunders, the Trump administration isn’t viral across social media, triggering many, includ- the only one taking advantage of ‘alternative ing New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, facts’. Whether in the form of blasphemous sub- to dub the expression Orwellian in reference to terfuge, twisted truths or ridiculous hyperbole, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, a classic hoax and fake news has always existed. Even in 1st novel which discusses a dystopian future con- century Rome, Octavian spread misinformation trolled by a manipulative, totalitarian state. Lies about Marc Anthony to convince the Empire that and twisted truth appear to be almost epidemic in he held anti-Roman sentiment; however, in the Donald Trump’s America: askew unemployment internet era, the issue of fake news is exponential- statistics, fairy-tale terrorist attacks and fictional ly evolving to be worse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Kellyanne Conway Has Repeatedly Lied About Nonexistent "Bowling Green Massacre"
    Kellyanne Conway Has Repeatedly Lied About N... https://www.democracynow.org/2017/2/7/headline... Kellyanne Conway Has Repeatedly Lied About Nonexistent "Bowling Green Massacre" HEADLINES FEB 07, 2017 New information has emerged showing that counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway has repeatedly made false claims about a nonexistent terrorist attack which she called the Bowling Green massacre. Conway’s comments first sparked controversy after a February 2 interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews in which she attempted to justify President Trump’s Muslim ban by citing a terrorist attack in Bowling Green, Kentucky, which never happened. Kellyanne Conway: "I bet it’s brand-new information to people that President Obama had a six-month ban on the Iraqi refugee program after two Iraqis came here to this country, were radicalized, and they were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green massacre. Most people don’t know that, because it didn’t get covered." After widespread criticism, Conway said she misspoke when she said "massacre," and that she intended to refer to the case of two Iraqi men living in Bowling Green who were arrested in 2011 on charges of having attempted to send money and weapons to al-Qaeda in Iraq. Their arrests led the Obama administration to implement a more extensive screening process for Iraqi refugees, but not to impose a ban on Iraqi resettlement. However, it’s now clear that Conway did not misspeak at all, as video and quotes of her making the same claims in two previous interviews have surfaced. In an interview with Cosmopolitan.com on January 29, she falsely claimed: "Two Iraqi nationals came to this country, joined Isis, traveled back to the Middle East to get trained and refine their terrorism skills, and come back here, and were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green massacre of taking innocent soldiers’ lives away." This is not true.
    [Show full text]
  • SCALE Scoop, Spring-Summer 2017
    SCALE SCOOP Volume 12, Issue 2 Spring/Summer 2017 ROCKIN’ WALKATHON INSIDE THIS ISSUE: An enthusiastic crowd of staff and students walked in the rain on May 12th to raise money for student scholarships. The walkathon, organized Real or Fake? 2 by Doreen Curreri, turned out to be one of the most successful in recent Immigrants Day 3 years, raising almost $3900. The success was largely due to students’ What We Brought 4-5 fundraising efforts. Thanks to everyone who participated! Conversation Groups 6 Perseverance 7 Financial Literacy 8 Students on the Move 9 One student, Margareth Oliveira, raised over $800 by collecting small donations from family, friends, and co-workers. What’s Real and What’s Fake? In November 2016, Stanford University researchers made an alarming discovery: across the US, many students can’t tell the difference between a reported news article, a persuasive opinion piece, and a corporate ad. This lack of media literacy makes young people vulnerable to getting duped by “fake news”. Fake news stories can have real-life consequences. For example, some people still believe the Bowling Green massacre occurred. However, the Bowling Green massacre is a nonexistent inci- dent referred to by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway in interviews with Cosmo- politan and TMZ on January 29, 2017, and in an interview on the MSNBC news program Hard- ball with Chris Matthews on February 2, 2017. Conway cited the "massacre" as justification for a travel and immigration ban from seven Muslim-majority countries enacted by United States Presi- dent Donald Trump.
    [Show full text]