Catholic Priests and Seminarians As German Soldiers, 1935-1945

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catholic Priests and Seminarians As German Soldiers, 1935-1945 Negotiating the Cross and the Swastika: Catholic Priests and Seminarians as German Soldiers, 1935-1945 ** approval of semi-final version By Lauren N. Faulkner B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2001 M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2003 A.M., Brown University, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2009 © 2009 by Lauren N. Faulkner This dissertation by Lauren N. Faulkner is accepted in its present form by the Department of History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date____________________ _______________________________ Omer Bartov, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate School Council Date____________________ _______________________________ Deborah A. Cohen, Reader Date____________________ _______________________________ Abbott Gleason, Reader Date____________________ _______________________________ Doris L. Bergen, Reader Approved by the Graduate School Council Date____________________ _______________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii Curriculum Vitae Lauren Faulkner was born on May 2, 1979, in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. She earned a B.A. at Simon Fraser University in 2001, an M.A. from Simon Fraser University in 2003 under the supervision of Martin Kitchen, and an A.M. from Brown University in 2004. She has a forthcoming article in Contemporary European History entitled “Catholic Priests as German Soldiers: Georg Werthmann and the Military Chaplaincy under the Third Reich.” She has taught an array of classes, including her own European History survey class at the Rhode Island School of Design in 2008 and a seminar on Holocaust narratives. She was also involved for two years as a research assistant with the multidisciplinary and international project Borderlands: Ethnicity, Identity, and Violence in the Shatter-Zone of Empires Since 1848, co-directed by Omer Bartov at the Watson Institute for International Studies. She has been awarded a Humboldt University (Berlin) Exchange Fellowship, a Brown University Research Travel Fellowship, and a Brown University Dissertation Fellowship. In August 2009 she will begin her position as assistant professor of History at the University of Notre Dame. iv Acknowledgments In the course of eight years of graduate work, the first two done at Simon Fraser University and the last six completed at Brown University, I have accrued many debts to many people. Their help was instrumental in the completion of my dissertation; any faults therein are entirely my own. My advisor, Omer Bartov, has been ever ready to respond to emails and requests to read yet another draft; whether it was a minor detail or a major conundrum, he engaged my work and my ideas with empathy and fervor. His guidance has been an essential element to the final product on these pages. Tom Gleason and I slogged through some of the deeper moral dilemmas of my work over many a Kartabar lunch; he is much more than a reader, he is my dear friend. My long-distance readers, Deborah Cohen and Doris Bergen, provided me with wonderful critical feedback and unstinting support, even before they read my work. They are both models of inspiration for me. My professors at Brown have taught me rigor, grace, and the determination to strive always for the best of which I am capable. Many have gone out of their way to be of assistance, sometimes on short notice. I would like to extend an enormous thank you to the faculty at the University of Notre Dame who read drafts of my work; their feedback and enthusiasm was incredibly valuable. Special thanks are due to Gary Chamberlain, C.S.C., Kevin Spicer, C.S.C., and Brad Gregory. I have formed several friendships at Brown that I know will last a lifetime: thank you for your patience and your love, your willingness to laugh with me, your generosity with your time, and the constant spirit of camaraderie, without which these years would have been much more difficult. My family, especially my brother, my sister, and my parents, have lived with this dissertation as long as I have, and have engaged in my struggles with me, equipped with fortitude and an endless supply of encouragement and love. I dedicate my work to each of them, and to Jean-François, my conscience, my other half: I would not have made it without you. v Table of Contents Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………iii Curriculum Vitae…………………………………………………………………………iv Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………..v Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………vi Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….1 1. Negotiating Identity: German Catholics Between Nationalism and Religion………...14 2. Putting Volk and Fatherland First: The Party, the Army High Command, and the Catholic Church,1933-1945………………………………………………….76 3. Georg Werthmann and Pastoral Care in the Wehrmacht…………………………….134 4. Men of God Among Army Soldiers………………………………………………….187 5. Men of God As Army Soldiers………………………………………………………250 Conclusion: A Question of (Catholic) Souls…………………………………………...296 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………320 vi Introduction At the end of April 1945, an American infantry division apprehended three Germans wearing Wehrmacht uniforms in a monastery near Deggendorf, in eastern Bavaria. When the lieutenant-colonel dutifully filed his report on the incident, he explained that the three men in question were not officers, as he had initially presumed, but in fact clergymen – the acting Catholic field bishop Georg Werthmann, the head of the Catholic chaplaincy, and the two leading Protestant spiritual authorities in the military.1 The Americans kept them interned for the next several weeks at the monastery where they found them. Not surprisingly, given the fact that Germany had just lost the war and the full extent of the regime’s crimes was becoming known, Werthmann professed to have been a long-term, staunch opponent of National Socialist ideology and Hitler. When pressed as to why he had served in the army, Werthmann answered with conviction: “We felt that we could be of greater service if we remained outside [the] concentration camp [system]. But we never compromised our principles, or our souls. We have been persecuted ever since the Nazis came to power... And I know personally that if Germany had won this war there would have been no more clergy in Germany.” He seemed certain of this last potentiality, exclaiming, “the entire Church in Germany would have been dissolved… and that all clergymen, both Catholic and Protestant, would have been liquidated.”2 1 From the document collection “Sammlung Werthmann” in the Archiv des Katholisches Militärbischofsamtes Berlin (henceforth referred to as KMBA SW), 1009/VII (Nr. 1), copy of official report filed by John Cotter, 1 May 1945. 2 AKMB SW 1009/VII (Nr. 1), copy of Gregor Zimmer interview (English version); undated. 1 Such was the immediate post-war image of the Catholic Church’s relationship with National Socialism in Werthmann’s mind, an image of hardship and oppression about which he would never change his opinion. He was remarkably well placed to be able to tender such views on the subject: in 1936, he became second-in-command of the Wehrmacht chaplaincy when the Catholic field bishop appointed him field vicar-general; he was thirty-seven years old, and had been a priest for a mere twelve years. The ways in which he fulfilled his responsibility as one of the leaders of the Catholic chaplaincy required that he make sense of, negotiate with, and reconcile political realities of the time – in particular Nazi ideology – and the military circumstances of a brutal war with his own understanding of how his faith aided him in his work. The ways that he managed these three spheres (the temporal political and military spheres, and the spiritual sphere) had considerable influence in determining his outlook on the war and what his own experience meant. Most priest and seminarians who found themselves wearing army uniforms between 1939 and 1945 shared some version of this process of negotiation. It is one of the contentions of this dissertation that Werthmann was, in many ways, representative of the more than 17,000 German Catholic priests, theology students, and seminarians at different levels of study who were conscripted over the course of the war, and who engaged consistently in attempting not only to understand their wartime service, but to justify it fully. This kind of service, and the ways in which these men made sense of it, pose a series of questions about the nature of the relationship between Catholicism and Nazism, about pastoral care within and beyond the chaplaincy in a time of war, and about the justifications for such service. How did Germany’s Catholic priests and seminarians 2 make sense of Nazism before and after its rise to power in 1933? How did they negotiate their national and religious identities during the Third Reich? Were the two ever in conflict, and how were such conflicts resolved? To what extent was this negotiation influenced, molded, or guided by secular, military, or religious authorities, namely, the Nazi Party, the army high command, and the leadership of the Catholic Church in Germany? How did those priests and seminarians understand their role in the armed forces during the Second World War? What defined their experiences? How did other soldiers and their officers view them? Did the conditions of their wartime service affect their chosen vocation, their faith in God, or their general religious beliefs? How did they describe their service in the post-war period? To what extent did they condemn their own behavior or the behavior of fellow soldiers, or justify it? Such a topic reveals a significant gap in existing historiography – about the impact of Catholic priests and seminarians on the German war effort – and also brings together a number of themes in modern German history. Recent historians have only begun to develop the extant narrow field of work on German military chaplains during the Second World War.
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Theresienstadt Concentration Camp from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Theresienstadt concentration camp From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E "Theresienstadt" redirects here. For the town, see Terezín. Navigation Theresienstadt concentration camp, also referred to as Theresienstadt Ghetto,[1][2] Main page [3] was established by the SS during World War II in the fortress and garrison city of Contents Terezín (German name Theresienstadt), located in what is now the Czech Republic. Featured content During World War II it served as a Nazi concentration camp staffed by German Nazi Current events guards. Random article Tens of thousands of people died there, some killed outright and others dying from Donate to Wikipedia malnutrition and disease. More than 150,000 other persons (including tens of thousands of children) were held there for months or years, before being sent by rail Interaction transports to their deaths at Treblinka and Auschwitz extermination camps in occupied [4] Help Poland, as well as to smaller camps elsewhere. About Wikipedia Contents Community portal Recent changes 1 History The Small Fortress (2005) Contact Wikipedia 2 Main fortress 3 Command and control authority 4 Internal organization Toolbox 5 Industrial labor What links here 6 Western European Jews arrive at camp Related changes 7 Improvements made by inmates Upload file 8 Unequal treatment of prisoners Special pages 9 Final months at the camp in 1945 Permanent link 10 Postwar Location of the concentration camp in 11 Cultural activities and
    [Show full text]
  • Uneeveningseveralyearsago
    SUdfffiiUeraiKdiesavadio speechfinWay9,3934, »eariya3fearjafierannounce !Uie9leich£oncoRlati^3he Vatican.Aisei^flope^us )isseamed^SLIRetef^ Sa^caonVeconber ahe*»otyireaf'4Dfl9ra: 'i ' TlfraR Long-buried Vatican files reveal a new anc ; shocking indictment of World War IPs Jj; : - I • • H.t.-,. in n. ; Pope Pius XII: that in pursuit of absolute power he helped Adolf Hitler destroy German ^ Catholic political opposition, betrayed the Europe, and sealed a deeply cynica pact with a 20th-century devi!. BBI BY JOHN CORNWELL the Final Solution. A young man, a prac was staged on Broadway in 1964. depict UnewheneveningI wasseveralhavingyearsdinnerago ticing Catholic, insisted that the case had ed Pacelli as a ruthless cynic, interested with a group of students, the never been proved. more in the Vatican's stockholdings than topic of the papacy was Raised as a Catholicduring the papacy in the fate of the Jews. Most Catholics dis broached, and the discussion of Pius XII—his picture gazed down from missed Hochhuth's thesis as implausible, quickly boiled over. A young the wall of every classroom during my but the play sparked a controversy which woman asserted that Eugenio Pacelli, Pope childhood—I was only too familiar with Pius XII, the Pope during World War the allegation. It started in 1963 with a play Excerpted from Hitler's Pope: TheSeci-et II, had brought lasting shame on the by a young German named Rolf Hoch- History ofPius XII. bj' John Comwell. to be published this month byViking; © 1999 Catholic Church by failing to denounce huth. DerStellverti-eter (The Deputy), which by the author. VANITY FAIR OCTOBER 1999 having reliable knowl- i edge of its true extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Pius XII on Trial
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Pius XII on Trial Katherine M. Campbell University of Maine - Main, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Campbell, Katherine M., "Pius XII on Trial" (2014). Honors College. 159. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/159 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PIUS XII ON TRIAL by Katherine M. Campbell A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (Anthropology and Political Science) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Henry Munson, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Grab, Professor of History Mark D. Brewer, Associate Professor of Political Science Richard J. Powell, Associate Professor of Political Science, Leadership Studies Sol Goldman, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Political Science Copyright 2014 Katherine M. Campbell Abstract: Scholars have debated Pope Pius XII’s role in the Holocaust since the 1960s. Did he do everything he could and should have done to save Jews? His critics say no because of antisemitism rooted in the traditional Catholic views. His defenders say yes and deny that he was an antisemite. In my thesis, I shall assess the arguments on both sides in terms of the available evidence. I shall focus both on what Pius XII did do and what he did not do and on the degree to which he can be held responsible for the actions of low-level clergy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vortrag Hummel Engl
    Prof em Dr Karl-Joseph Hummel Berlin, 30 June 2018 Martyrs: Remembrance, the sine qua non for a reconciled future I The generation with personal experience There was no doubt whatever among those witnesses who were able to give a first-hand account of the Third Reich in 1945, the “terrible year of grace” (Reinhold Schneider), both inside and outside Germany, that the period of National Socialism had left behind it a massive amount of guilt. The question, which was and is disputed, is who had what share of it. The religious sister Isa Vermehren, who herself was incarcerated in a concentration camp, described the dilemma as follows in her “Witness from a dark past”: “It was not easy to remain innocent in the Nazi period. If you were innocent in the eyes of the Nazis, you were hardly innocent in terms of your own conscience – if you retained a clear conscience, you were hardly innocent in the eyes of the Nazis.” At that time, the Church and Catholics regarded themselves – to a highly prevalent degree – as standing together on the side of the victims. The spectrum of self-perception ranged from the assessment of the concentration camp inmate and later Munich Auxiliary Bishop Neuhäusler “Resistance was powerful and dogged, at the top and at the bottom, coming from the Pope and the bishops, from the clergy and the people, from individuals and whole organisations.” (ideological resistance), to the examination of conscience of Albrecht Haushofer, who for many years was friends with Rudolf Heß, and who was arrested after 20 July 1944 and later shot by the SS: Haushofer wrote in a sonnet from prison in Moabit: “I bear lightly what the court will call my guilt..
    [Show full text]
  • Wörrstadt / Gau Odernheim
    Gültig ab 2. September 2019 Q 441 Wörrstadt / Gau Odernheim - Gabsheim - Saulheim (- Nieder-Olm) Q An Rosenmontag und Fastnachtdienstag, sowie Freitag nach Christi Himmelfahrt und nach Fronleichnam, Verkehr wie in den Ferien.Am 24. und 31.12. Verkehr wie Samstag Am 01.11. und Fronleichnam Verkehr wie an Sonn- und Feiertagen Montag - Freitag 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0441 0000 0441 0441 0441 101 301 103 901 303 803 305 805 307 309 311 313 909 911 315 915 317 319 Verkehrsbeschränkungen S F S F S S S F S S004 Hinweise Gau-Odernheim Marktplatz .559 .7 59 .7 59 .9 59 11. 59 12. 42 13. 59 Gau-Odernheim Mainzer Straße .601 .8 01 .8 01 10. 01 12. 01 12. 44 14. 01 Bechtolsheim Musikhalle 12.47 Bechtolsheim Rathaus 12.48 Bechtolsheim Brückesgasse 12.49 Biebelnheim Ortsmitte .604 .8 04 .8 04 10. 04 12. 04 12. 51 14. 04 Wörrstadt Bahnhof .658 .6 58 .8 58 10.58 12.58 13. 10 14.58 Wörrstadt Schulzentrum 13.15 13. 15 Wörrstadt Friedrich-Ebert-Straße .700 .7 00 .9 00 11.00 13.00 15.00 Wörrstadt Rommersheimer Straße 13.16 Wörrstadt Rommersheimer Straße .702 .7 02 .9 02 11.02 13.02 15.02 Wörrstadt Pariser Straße .703 .7 03 .9 03 11.03 13.03 13. 17 15.03 Gabsheim Unterpforte .543 .6 10 .6 38 .7 04 .7 10 .7 10 .8 10 .8 10 .9 10 10. 10 11. 10 12. 10 12. 57 13.
    [Show full text]
  • USHMM Finding
    http://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection RG-50.862: EHRLICH COLLECTION - SUMMARY NOTES OF AUDIO FILES Introductory note by Anatol Steck, Project Director in the International Archival Programs Division of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: These summary transcription notes of the digitized interviews recorded by Leonard and Edith Ehrlich in the 1970s as part of their research for their manuscript about the Jewish community leadership in Vienna and Theresienstadt during the Holocaust titled "Choices under Duress" are a work in progress. The project started in April 2016 and is ongoing. The summary notes are being typed while listening to the recordings in real time; this requires simultaneous translation as many of the interviews are in German, often using Viennese vernacular and/or Yiddish terms (especially in the case of the lengthy interview with Benjamin Murmelstein which the Ehrlichs recorded with Mr. and Mrs. Murmelstein over several days in their apartment in Rome and which constitutes a major part of this collection). The summary notes are intended as a tool and a finding aid for the researcher; researchers are strongly encouraged to consult the digitized recordings for accuracy and authenticity and not to rely solely on the summary notes. As much as possible, persons mentioned by name in the interviews are identified and described in the text; however, as persons are often referred to in the interviews only by last name, their identification is sometimes based on the context in which their names appear within the interview (especially in cases where different persons share the same last name).
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim Niederschrift
    Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim Öffentlicher Teil der Niederschrift über die 16. Sitzung des Gemeinderates der Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim der Wahlperiode 2019 – 2024 am 13. Juli 2021 in der Musikhalle der Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim Beginn: 19:01 Uhr Ende: 21:00 Uhr SITZUNGSTEILNEHMER Stimmrecht ANWESEND: Name Funktion Bemerkung Mann, Dieter Ortsbürgermeister und Vorsitzender ja Dr. Strecker, Harald Erster Beigeordneter u. Ratsmitglied ja Uhink, Mathias Beigeordneter u. Ratsmitglied ja Borlinghaus, Axel Ratsmitglied ja Brand, Gerhard Ratsmitglied ja Breivogel, Sylvia Ratsmitglied ja Dolata, Jens Ratsmitglied ja Eisenbarth, Holger Ratsmitglied ja Flick, Ronald Ratsmitglied ja Jennewein, Albert Ratsmitglied ab 19.05 Uhr; vor Abstimmung zu TOP 1 ja Maas, Helmut Ratsmitglied ja Müller, Thilo Ratsmitglied ja Scherning, Frank Ratsmitglied ja Schmelzer, Sandra Ratsmitglied ja Ullmer, Kai Ratsmitglied ja Wieland, Annedore Ratsmitglied ja Öffentlicher Teil der Niederschrift über die 16. Sitzung des Gemeinderates der Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim am 13.07.2021 NICHT ANWESEND: Name Funktion Bemerkung Jennewein, Sabrina Ratsmitglied entschuldigt SCHRIFTFÜHRER - VERWALTUNGSMITARBEITER Name Funktion Bemerkung Druck, Sabrina Schriftführerin GÄSTE / ZUHÖRER Name Funktion Bemerkung Göck, Horst Flick, Rudolf Schwarz, Christina Weinheimer, Ludwig Wollny, Hugo 2 Öffentlicher Teil der Niederschrift über die 16. Sitzung des Gemeinderates der Ortsgemeinde Bechtolsheim am 13.07.2021 Ortsbürgermeister und Vorsitzender Dieter Mann begrüßt die Anwesenden. Er stellt fest, dass mit Schreiben vom 05.07.2021 form- und fristgerecht gemäß § 34 Absatz 2 der Gemeindeordnung zur Sitzung eingeladen wurde. Wegen der Corona-Pandemie findet die 15. Sitzung des Ortsgemeinderates in der Musikhalle und unter Beachtung der geltenden Hygienevorschriften statt. Die Abstandsregelungen werden eingehalten; Desinfektionsmittel und Mikrofone stehen zur Verfügung. Zutritt zum Saal und den Toiletten ist nur einzeln und mit Mundschutz gestattet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOSM: Portrait of a European City Major Disturbance
    In Breslau, the overthrow of the imperial authorities passed off without MICROCOSM: Portrait of a European City major disturbance. On 8 November, a Loyal Appeal for the citizens to uphold by Norman Davies (pp. 326-379) their duties to the Kaiser was distributed in the names of the Lord Mayor, Paul Matting, Archbishop Bertram and others. But it had no great effect. The Commander of the VI Army Corps, General Pfeil, was in no mood for a fight. Breslau before and during the Second World War He released the political prisoners, ordered his men to leave their barracks, 1918-45 and, in the last order of the military administration, gave permission to the Social Democrats to hold a rally in the Jahrhunderthalle. The next afternoon, a The politics of interwar Germany passed through three distinct phases. In group of dissident airmen arrived from their base at Brieg (Brzeg). Their arrival 1918-20, anarchy spread far and wide in the wake of the collapse of the spurred the formation of 'soldiers' councils' (that is, Soviets) in several military German Empire. Between 1919 and 1933, the Weimar Republic re-established units and of a 100-strong Committee of Public Safety by the municipal leaders. stability, then lost it. And from 1933 onwards, Hitler's 'Third Reich' took an The Army Commander was greatly relieved to resign his powers. ever firmer hold. Events in Breslau, as in all German cities, reflected each of The Volksrat, or 'People's Council', was formed on 9 November 1918, from the phases in turn. Social Democrats, union leaders, Liberals and the Catholic Centre Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Janusz Odziemkowski Bitwa Nad Autą, 4–6 Lipca 1920 Roku
    Janusz Odziemkowski Bitwa nad Autą, 4–6 lipca 1920 roku Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy 14(65)/1 (243), 51-74 2013 JANUSZ ODZIEMKOWSKI bitWa nad autą, 4–6 lipca 1920 roku dniach 4–6 lipca 1920 r. na północnym odcinku frontu polsko-rosyj- skiego, rozciągającego się od dolnej Dźwiny po ukrainne stepy, 1 Armia gen. Gustawa Zygadłowicza toczyła walki z wojskami Frontu Zachodnie- Wgo Michaiła Tuchaczewskiego. Przeszły one do historii jako „bitwa nad Autą”, od nazwy rzeki, na której była oparta obrona centrum zgrupowania 1 Armii. Bitwę nad Autą trzeba zaliczyć do najważniejszych wydarzeń wojny Rzeczypospolitej z Rosją bolszewicką. Zapoczątkowała ona bowiem odwrót wojsk polskich na Białorusi i Li- twie, przejęcie inicjatywy przez przeciwnika, którego rozpoczęty wówczas pochód na zachód został zatrzymany dopiero po 6 tygodniach na przedpolach Warszawy. Mimo tych okoliczności bitwa nie doczekała się szerszego opracowania w polskiej literaturze historycznowojskowej, nie zajmuje też zatem właściwego jej miejsca w świadomości historycznej społeczeństwa. Zasadnicze kwestie związane z bitwą nad Autą dotykają dwóch zagadnień: przy- czyn porażki 1 Armii oraz związanego z tym pytania, czy przy ówczesnym stosunku sił na północnym odcinku frontu przegranej można było uniknąć lub przynajmniej zminimalizować jej skutki. TEREN Bitwa rozegrała się na froncie o szerokości około 100 km, rozciągającym się od rzeki Dźwiny w rejonie Dryssy na północy, po bagna górnej Berezyny na południu. Wysunięty najdalej na północ odcinek frontu 1 Armii obejmował obszar o szerokości około 20 km, usytuowany między Dźwiną skręcającą w tym miej- scu na północny zachód, a jej lewobrzeżnym dopływem – Dzisną. Mniej więcej w centrum tego obszaru leży jezioro Jelnia. W 1920 r.
    [Show full text]