Task 0637 Analysis Toward Mitigation of Congestion and Conflicts at Light
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling
Appendix A ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Salvatore Sabina, Fabio Poli and Nazelie Kassabian A.1 Interoperable Constituents The basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command and Signalling Sub- systems are, respectively, defined in TableA.1 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling On-board Subsystem [1] and TableA.2 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. The functions of basic interoperability constituents may be combined to form a group. This group is then defined by those functions and by its remaining exter- nal interfaces. If a group is formed in this way, it shall be considered as an inter- operability constituent. TableA.3 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling On-board Subsystem [1]. TableA.4 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. S. Sabina (B) Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Paolo Mantovani 3-5, 16151 Genova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] F. Poli Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Ferrante Imparato 184, 80147 Napoli, Italy e-mail: [email protected] N. Kassabian Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Volvera 50, 10045 Piossasco Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 233 L. Lo Presti and S. Sabina (eds.), GNSS for Rail Transportation,PoliTO Springer Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79084-8 234 Appendix A: ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Table A.1 Basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command -
Sesd Existing Condition Report.Pdf
EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT MARCH 2013 Prepared for City of San Diego Prepared by Assisted by Chen/Ryan Associates Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. MW Steele Group Inc. RECON Environmental, Inc. Spurlock Poirier Landscape Architects Ninyo & Moore Page & Turnbull Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc. Table of Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1-1 1.1 Community Plan Purpose and Process.......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Regional Location and Planning Boundaries ................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Southeastern San Diego Demographic Overview .......................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Existing Plans and Efforts Underway ............................................................................................................. 1-7 1.5 Report Organization .................................................................................................................................... 1-16 2 LAND USE ...................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Existing Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Density and Intensity .................................................................................................................................... -
Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers. -
[(Central] [Central, 6 E -1 4
/NEWYORK^ Fnewyork^ [(Central] [Central, 6 e -1 4 Reference Marks NEW YORK CENTRAL LC.L Between POPULAR ALL-COACH DAYLINER Dally. II Meal station. Sunday only. • Thla train does not carry baggage SERVICE ADVANTAGES Chicago, Pittsburgh & Boston Daily except Sunday- Ex. Sun.—Runs dally except Sunday. Daily except Monday. E.T.—Eastern Standard Time. Daily except Saturday. C.T.—Central Standard Time. In addition to the train service shown, buses of the United Traction Company run at frequent intervals between Albany and Troy. | I i^i ichedulot . pcart'd to 5 Packing and handling research Stops on signal to receive passengers for stations beyond Albuny. traffic requirement! for most ... they assure the security ol Stops to receive or discbarge passengers for or from Astatabula and beyond. Stops except Saturdays and Sundays. rX|M*llitioilH .1. Ii\ i-r n--. the shipped merchandise. bb Stops at 6.25 a. m. to discharge passengers from Rochester and beyond or to 2 Free pick up and delivery ser• receive passengers for Chicago. Smooth operation . easy 4 Stops on signal to receive passengers for beyond Troy. vice . direct from Hliippcr's grades... superlative roadbed. Stops on signal to discharge or receive passengers. to roiisipiirrV door. No baggage handled for or from this station; *y Constant supervision and pro• Stops regularly, but only to receive passengers. * f Optional trucking allowance to tection in transit.. still mon Stops only to discbarge passengers. nhi|»|MTH jiiul roiittignrcR ... a security for shipped merchan Runs Saturdays only. mi I • i i ii i ii I tavina to both. dise. -
APPENDIX G Noise Modeling
APPENDIX G Noise Modeling Emissions Traffic Noise Gradient Stationing ADT Traffic values Vehicle day Speed Control Constr. Speed Affect. Road surface Min / Max (km) (Veh/24h) Vehicles type name (Veh/h) (km/h) device (km/h) veh. (%) (%) Navajo - SR-125 SB to SR-125 NB Traffic direction: In entry direction 5+184 90960 Total - 3790 - none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Automobiles - 3582 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Medium trucks - 114 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Heavy trucks - 38 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Buses - 38 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Motorcycles - 19 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 90960 Auxiliary Vehicle - - - none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+209 - - - - - - Navajo Road - SR-125 to Fletcher Traffic direction: In entry direction 5+184 66240 Total - 2760 - none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Automobiles - 2608 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Medium trucks - 83 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Heavy trucks - 28 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Buses - 28 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Motorcycles - 14 56 none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+184 66240 Auxiliary Vehicle - - - none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) 0.000 5+652 - - - - - - Fletcher - Chatham to Navajo Traffic direction: In entry direction 5+184 33120 Total - 1380 - none - - Average (of DGAC and PCC) -
Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7
Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7 railroads that operate on standard gage (5) Removal of an intermittent auto- track which is part of the general rail- matic train stop system in conjunction road system of transportation. with the implementation of a positive (b) This part does not apply to rail train control system approved by FRA rapid transit operations conducted over under subpart I of part 236 of this chap- track that is used exclusively for that ter. purpose and that is not part of the gen- (b) When the resultant arrangement eral system of railroad transportation. will comply with part 236 of this title, it is not necessary to file for approval § 235.5 Changes requiring filing of ap- to decrease the limits of a system as plication. follows: (a) Except as provided in § 235.7, ap- (1) Decrease of the limits of an inter- plications shall be filed to cover the locking when interlocked switches, de- following: rails, or movable-point frogs are not in- (1) The discontinuance of a block sig- volved; nal system, interlocking, traffic con- (2) Removal of electric or mechanical trol system, automatic train stop, lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, train control, or cab signal system or from hand-operated switch in auto- other similar appliance or device; matic block signal or traffic control (2) The decrease of the limits of a territory where train speed over the block signal system, interlocking, traf- switch does not exceed 20 miles per fic control system, automatic train hour; or stop, train control, or cab signal sys- (3) Removal of electric or mechanical tem; or lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, (3) The modification of a block signal from hand-operated switch in auto- system, interlocking, traffic control matic block signal or traffic control system, automatic train stop, train territory where trains are not per- control, or cab signal system. -
Developing Standards for New Technology Signal Systems for Rail Transit Applications
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 34, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Developing standards for new technology signal systems for rail transit applications A. F. Rumsey Parsons Transportation, New York, U.S.A. Abstract Radio communications-based train control (CBTC) systems, also referred to as transmission-based signalling (TBS) systems, permit more effective utilization of rail transit infrastructure by allowing trains to operate safety at much closer headways, by permitting greater flexibility and greater precision in train control, and by providing continuous safe train separation assurance and overspeed protection. One of the challenges facing transit agencies who are considering the introduction of CBTC systems, however, is the lack of industry standards for this emerging technology, and the current inability of trains equipped with CBTC equipment from one supplier to operate on track equipped with CBTC equipment from a second supplier. This paper reports on the status of two separate initiatives being taken in North America to develop standards for CBTC systems for rail transit applications; one based on a voluntary consensus development approach, and the second based on a competitive procurement approach. 1 Background Conventional signalling and train control systems rely almost exclusively on track circuits to detect the presence of trains. Information on the status of the track ahead is provided to train operators either through wayside signals or trainborne cab signals. Ensuring compliance with the signals is achieved either through strict observance of operating procedures, or through automatic train protection features such as wayside electro-mechanical train stops, or trainborne supervisory equipment linked to the train's braking system. -
Trolley Regional Telephone Information (619) 233-3004 All Trolleys Are Equipped with Wheelchair Lifts Or Ramps
Rider Information Promotions & Discounts Phone Directory Información para los pasajeros Promociones y descuentos Guía de teléfonos Accessible Service Family Weekends Service/Trip Planning www.sdmts.com Accesibilidad de los servicios Fines de semana para la familia Trolley Regional Telephone Information (619) 233-3004 All Trolleys are equipped with wheelchair lifts or ramps. Two children (12 and under) ride free Saturdays and Seats closest to the doors are set aside as a courtesy for Sundays with a fare-paying adult (18 or older). Toll Free Transit Information 5-1-1 senior and disabled riders. Dos menores (de hasta 12 años) viajan gratis los sábados y domingos TTY/TDD (619) 234-5005 con sólo abonar la tarifa de un adulto (de 18 años o mayor). Todos los trolleys cuentan con elevadores o rampas para sillas de or 1-888-722-4889 ruedas. Los asientos más cercanos a las puertas están reservados Holiday Friends Ride Free por gentileza para pasajeros mayores o discapacitados. 24-Hour InfoExpress (619) 685-4900 Los días festivos, los amigos viajan gratis Blue Line Animals On the New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, MTS Trolley, Inc. (619) 595-4949 Animales Orange Line Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day holidays Fare Machine Problems (619) 595-4960 A trained service animal may accompany a rider with your friend may ride any MTS Bus or Trolley for free when Green Line disabilities. Non-service animals must be in enclosed you pay your regular fare using cash, token or pass. Lost and Found / The Transit Store (619) 234-1060 carriers and transported by passengers without En Año Nuevo, Memorial Day, Día de la Independencia (E.E.U.U.), assistance of drivers or operators. -
Workshop 1 Long Board Working-File
Bayshore Bikeway through Barrio Logan Constraints Chicano US Naval Base S. 32nd St. Park S. 28th St. Pacific Fleet Street Crossing Station Narrow Bridge Jitney Stop Street Crossing Harborside Station Harbor Drive New Development S. 26th St. Perkins Elementary Cesar Chavez Pkwy. Chavez Cesar Transit Center Station St. Sampson School Woodbury Univ. School of Architecture Constraints Legend Coronado Bridge Coronado Potential retaining wall to fit bikeway Infrastructure Constraints Continuing Light Rail Stop Retaining Wall Education Center Street Crossing Street Crossing Light Rail Line Transit power station Wind Turbine Truck Radius Heavy Rail Line Roadway Constraint Point of Connection blocks bikeway alignment Narrow Railroad Crossing Bus Route Narrow bridge deck Barrio Logan Station On Street Parking Chollas Creek Bus Stop Traffic Barrier Street Crossing Heavy Equipment Truck Radius Harbor Drive Gaslamp Quarter Station Point of Entry National Steel and US Naval Base Inner Wheel Radius Shipbuilding Company BAE Systems Opportunities S. 32nd St. Chicano US Naval Base Connection to Chollas Creek Trail Park S. 28th St. Pacific Fleet Station Harborside Station Harbor Drive New Development S. 26th St. Petco Park Cesar Chavez Pkwy. Chavez Cesar Perkins Elementary St. Sampson School Opportunities Legend Transit Center Station Woodbury Univ. Infrastructure Opportunities School of Architecture Coronado Bridge Coronado Light Rail Stop Important Intersection Light Rail Line Important Street Continuing Heavy Rail Line Crossing Connection to Education Center Bus Route Barrio Logan Potential Bus Stop Bayshore Bikeway Point of Connection Barrio Logan Station Existing Path Harbor Drive Chollas Creek Gaslamp Quarter Station National Steel and US Naval Base No parking along this section of road allows for other design Shipbuilding Company opportunities. -
Low-Cost Highway-Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field
Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: December 2005 Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic, Security and Operations Prepared by: URS Corporation and TranSmart Technologies, Inc. December 2005 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 ROJECTP PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 ARTICIPANTSP .................................................................................................................. 3 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 4 2.1 YSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST................................ 4 2.2 HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION....................................................................................... 6 3. REVIEW OF EMERGING HRI TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 7 3.1 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVE WARNING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 7 3.2 MERGINGE HRI TECHNOLOGY........................................................................................ -
Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections a Cross-Cutting Study
Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections A Cross-Cutting Study Improving Safety and Mobility at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings December 2001 Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections: A Cross-Cutting Study i Executive Summary In 1997, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO) at the Federal Highway Administration commissioned a study to identify projects being conducted in the U.S. that used Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) at highway-rail grade crossings, including not only those projects that were Federally-sponsored, but state and locally-sponsored ones, as well. The study identified seven projects that tested five functions: in-vehicle warning, second train warning, use of crossing blockage information for traveler information and traffic management, four quadrant gates with automatic train stop, and a comprehensive set of technologies called the Intelligent Grade Crossing. The following year, the JPO commissioned a cross-cutting study to examine the commonalities and differences among the seven projects. This report documents the findings of that cross-cutting study: · Several railroads were reluctant to fully participate in the projects due to liability, safety and operational concerns. Although there were exceptions, passenger railroads – and, in particular, light rail transit – tended to be more involved in these projects than freight railroads. · In all but one of the seven projects examined in this study, the largest share of funding came from the Federal level, through either direct Federal grants or Congressional designations. In the one project that was the exception to this rule, the largest share of funding came from a private sector technology vendor who made in-kind contributions, using the opportunity of the test to refine its prototype system. -
San Diego Trolley: Us
San Diego Trolley: us. Department of Thinsportation The First Three Years November 1984 San Diego Trolley: The First Three Years Summary Report November 1984 Prepared by San Diego Association of Governments 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 524 Security Pacific Plaza San Diego, California 92101 Prepared for Office of Planning Assistance Urban Mass Transportation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 Distributed in Cooperation with Technology Sharing Program Office of the Secretary of Transportation DOT-l-85-10 Board of Directors SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is a voluntary public agency formed by local governments to assure overall areawide planning and coordination for the San Diego region. Voting members include the Incorporated Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, and Vista. Advisory and Liaison members include CALTRANS, U.S. Department of Defense and Tijuana/Baja California Norte. CHAIRMAN: Jess Van Deventer VICE CHAIRMAN: Ernie Cowan SECRETARY-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Richard J. Huff CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF OCEANSIDE Mary Casler, Mayor Lawrence M. Bagley, Mayor (A) Richard Chick, Vice Mayor (A) Ted Marioncelli, Councilman CITY OF CHULA VISTA Greg Cox, Mayor CITY OF POWAY (A) Frank Scott, Councilman Robert Emery, Deputy Mayor (A) Carl Kruse, Councilman CITY OF CORONADO Lois Ewen, Councilwoman CITY OF SAN DIEGO (A) Robert G. Odiorne, Mayor Pro Tern Ed Struiksma, Councilman (A) Mike Gotch, Deputy Mayor CITY OF DEL MAR James W. Tetrault, Mayor CITY OF SAN MARCOS (A) Veronica "Ronnie" Delaney, Councilwoman James D.