Progressive Training in Recurrent Neural Networks for Chord Progression Modeling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Progressive Training in Recurrent Neural Networks for Chord Progression Modeling Progressive Training in Recurrent Neural Networks for Chord Progression Modeling Trung-Kien Vu, Teeradaj Racharak, Satoshi Tojo, Nguyen Ha Thanh and Nguyen Le Minh School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Ishikawa, Japan fkienvu, racharak, tojo, nguyenhathanh, nguyenmlg@jaist.ac.jp Keywords: Recurrent Neural Network, Chord Progression Modeling, Sequence Prediction, Knowledge Compilation. Abstract: Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can be trained to process sequences of tokens as they show impressive results in several sequence prediction. In general, when RNNs are trained, their goals are to maximize the likelihood of each token in the sequence where each token could be represented as a one-hot representation. That is, the model learns for its sequence prediction from true class labels. However, this creates a potential drawback, i.e., the model cannot learn from the mistakes. In this work, we propose a progressive learning strategy that can mitigate the mistakes by using domain knowledge. Our strategy gently changes the training process from using the class labels guiding scheme to the similarity distribution of class labels instead. Our experiments on chord progression modeling show that this training paradigm yields significant improvements. 1 INTRODUCTION tion learning requires a large amount of training data, which may be not easily available. On the other hand, Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can be used to a learning efficiency can be improved by injecting do- produce sequences of tokens, given input/output main knowledge for guiding the learning process. For pairs. Generally, they are trained to maximize the instance, (Song et al., 2019) injected medical ontolo- likelihood of each target token given the current gies to regularize learnable parameters. In this work, state of the model and the previous target token, in we concentrate on the latter approach, i.e., how do- which target tokens could be in one-hot representa- main knowledge can be incorporated at training time? tions (Bengio et al., 2015). This training process helps Intuitively, to address this difficulty, we observe the model to learn a language model over sequences that the model could be guided by domain knowledge of tokens. In fact, RNNs and their variants, such as when it is learnt to produce a wrong prediction. Like the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Re- the work done by (Bengio et al., 2015), the model current Unit (GRU), have shown impressive results in can be guided by more than one target vectors dur- machine translation such as (Sutskever et al., 2014; ing training. RNNs usually optimize the loss func- Bahdanau et al., 2015; Meng and Zhang, 2019), im- tion between a predicted sequence and the true se- age captioning such as (Vinyals et al., 2015), and quence. This kind of optimization causes a potential chord progression such as (Choi et al., 2016). drawback, i.e., the model may be mistaken when its When the model is trained from input/output pairs, predicted sequence is incorrect. To alleviate this prob- it may cause the model per se to mistake the predic- lem, we compile domain knowledge in terms of sim- tion during training steps. Indeed, the model is fully ilarity distribution of class labels. Then, we propose guided by the true labels at its correct prediction; but, to change the training process by forcing the model is less guided otherwise. Different kinds of method- to learn from two different vectors (i.e. the true tar- ologies were proposed to mitigate this kind of learn- get distribution and the similarity target distribution). ing efficiency by enriching the input’s information via For this, we introduce a progressive learning strategy transfer learning like word embedding (cf. (Mikolov which gradually switches from similarity target dis- et al., 2013; Pennington et al., 2014)) or knowledge tribution to the true target distribution. Doing so, the graph embedding (cf. (Ristoski et al., 2019)). This model can be learnt to predict a reasonable outcome technique exploits a learnt vector representation at when the model generates a token deviating from the training time and the learning paradigm can be done true label. This enables the model to be learnt for pre- as usual. Despite its promising result, representa- dicting correctly later when it mistakes its prediction earlier. For instance, in chord progression modeling, a To solve such problems of the recurrent neu- mistake for predicting G[maj instead of F]maj should ral network architecture, Long short-term memory not gain feedback for training equally as a mistake (LSTM) network was proposed with the idea that prediction of Cmaj for the same chord F]maj. This not all inputs in the sequence contribute with impor- observation is reasonable because G[maj and F]maj tant information. The LSTM architecture allows the are fundamentally the same chord (which are named model to choose which inputs in the sequence are im- differently); and, Cmaj and F]maj have no relation- portant and forget the others. A standard LSTM con- ship to each other. A neural network should be able to tains an input gate, an output gate and a forget gate as utilize feedback from similarity information between shown in Figure 1. class labels at training time. The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we introduce an approach to compile domain knowl- edge as similarity distributions for injecting at train- ing time. Second, we propose a progressive learning strategy to gradually switch the training target from the similarity distribution to the true distribution. We elaborate our proposed approach with more techni- cal details in Section 3. Furthermore, Section 2 and Section 4 present preliminaries and experimental re- sults, respectively. Section 5 makes comparisons of our work with others. Finally, Section 6 discusses the Figure 1: LSTM architecture can capture longer input se- quence. conclusion and future directions. Let i, f and o denote the input, forget and out- put gates, respectively. Then, the hidden state ht in a 2 RNN-BASED SEQUENCE LSTM network is calculated as follows: PREDICTION MODEL i i i it = s(xtU + ht−1W + b ) (1) f f f The Hopfield Networks (John, 1982) is the precur- ft = s(xtU + ht−1W + b ) (2) sor to recurrent neural networks. The architecture of o o o ot = s(xtU + ht−1W + b ) (3) these neural networks allows the reception of signals ˜ g g g from consecutive inputs. RNNs were invented with Ct = tanh(xtU + ht−1W + b ) (4) the main idea of using information from the previous Ct = s( ft ∗Ct−1 + it ∗C˜t ) (5) steps to give the most accurate prediction for the cur- ht = tanh(Ct ) ∗ ot (6) rent prediction step. In a feed-forward neural network, inputs are pro- In the equations, U is the weight matrix from the input cessed separately; as a result, it cannot capture the re- and W is the weight matrix from the hidden layer in the previous time step. Ct is the memory of the unit lation information between entities in a sequence. In ˜ contrast, a recurrent neural network maintains a loop and Ct is the candidate for cell state at timestamp t. s of information in its architecture. After being pro- denotes the sigmoid function and ∗ is the elementwise cessed, an output is fed back into the network to be multiplication. processed with the next inputs. RNN has many vari- LSTM models are effective in sequential tasks. In ations, but the most famous one is LSTM (Hochreiter sequence tagging, (Huang et al., 2015) proposed a and Schmidhuber, 1997) and GRU (Cho et al., 2014). model that processes the feature in both directions. Despite the ability to combine information from In speech recognition, (Graves et al., 2013) used the inputs of sequences, the recurrent neural network bidirectional LSTM and achieved state-of-the-art re- models have a weakness namely “vanishing gra- sults in phoneme recognition. In language modeling, dients”. Processing a long sequence, the model (Sundermeyer et al., 2012) proved that using LSTM feeds information across multiple layers and multi- can bring significant improvement in this task. ple timesteps; as a result, the parameter sequence be- comes longer. During the training process, loss value is back-propagated from the output layer to previous 3 PROPOSED APPROACH layers for updating all the weights. However, in a long sequence of parameters, the loss becomes zero at the Multi-class classification is the task of classifying in- beginning of the sequence. stances into one of K classes and can be trained for sequence prediction (cf. Section 2). For that, a neu- property set of class a by Pa, in which Pa ⊆ P . To ral network classifier is given a vectorized represen- capture the notion of relevancy, we define a function tation of an input and produces a K-dimensional pre- w : P ! R≥0 capturing the importance of properties, dicted vector yˆ := [yˆ1;:::;yˆK], which is a probability in which w(pk) > 0 indicates that pk has more impor- distribution representing the confidence of the clas- tance and w(pk) := 0 indicates that pk is of no impor- sifier over K classes. In the standard training pro- tance in an application context. Then, the similarity cess, the network is trained to generate a high confi- between class a and b (denoted by s(a;b)) can be de- dence towards the correct class by updating its weight fined in the following equation. q to minimize Kullback-Leibler divergence between its prediction vector yˆ and the one-hot representation s(a;b) := ∑ w(p) (8) y of the correct class (cf. Equation 7). p2Pa\Pb K Intuitively, Equation 8 calculates the summation of yi DKL(y;yˆ) := ∑ yi log (7) weighted common properties between two classes.
Recommended publications
  • The Group-Theoretic Description of Musical Pitch Systems
    The Group-theoretic Description of Musical Pitch Systems Marcus Pearce marcus.pearce@qmul.ac.uk 1 Introduction Balzano (1980, 1982, 1986a,b) addresses the question of finding an appropriate level for describing the resources of a pitch system (e.g., the 12-fold or some microtonal division of the octave). His motivation for doing so is twofold: “On the one hand, I am interested as a psychologist who is not overly impressed with the progress we have made since Helmholtz in understanding music perception. On the other hand, I am interested as a computer musician who is trying to find ways of using our pow- erful computational tools to extend the musical [domain] of pitch . ” (Balzano, 1986b, p. 297) Since the resources of a pitch system ultimately depend on the pairwise relations between pitches, the question is one of how to conceive of pitch intervals. In contrast to the prevailing approach which de- scribes intervals in terms of frequency ratios, Balzano presents a description of pitch sets as mathematical groups and describes how the resources of any pitch system may be assessed using this description. Thus he is concerned with presenting an algebraic description of pitch systems as a competitive alternative to the existing acoustic description. In these notes, I shall first give a brief description of the ratio based approach (§2) followed by an equally brief exposition of some necessary concepts from the theory of groups (§3). The following three sections concern the description of the 12-fold division of the octave as a group: §4 presents the nature of the group C12; §5 describes three perceptually relevant properties of pitch-sets in C12; and §6 describes three musically relevant isomorphic representations of C12.
    [Show full text]
  • Jazz Harmony Iii
    MU 3323 JAZZ HARMONY III Chord Scales US Army Element, School of Music NAB Little Creek, Norfolk, VA 23521-5170 13 Credit Hours Edition Code 8 Edition Date: March 1988 SUBCOURSE INTRODUCTION This subcourse will enable you to identify and construct chord scales. This subcourse will also enable you to apply chord scales that correspond to given chord symbols in harmonic progressions. Unless otherwise stated, the masculine gender of singular is used to refer to both men and women. Prerequisites for this course include: Chapter 2, TC 12-41, Basic Music (Fundamental Notation). A knowledge of key signatures. A knowledge of intervals. A knowledge of chord symbols. A knowledge of chord progressions. NOTE: You can take subcourses MU 1300, Scales and Key Signatures; MU 1305, Intervals and Triads; MU 3320, Jazz Harmony I (Chord Symbols/Extensions); and MU 3322, Jazz Harmony II (Chord Progression) to obtain the prerequisite knowledge to complete this subcourse. You can also read TC 12-42, Harmony to obtain knowledge about traditional chord progression. TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVES MU 3323 1 ACTION: You will identify and write scales and modes, identify and write chord scales that correspond to given chord symbols in a harmonic progression, and identify and write chord scales that correspond to triads, extended chords and altered chords. CONDITION: Given the information in this subcourse, STANDARD: To demonstrate competency of this task, you must achieve a minimum of 70% on the subcourse examination. MU 3323 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Subcourse Introduction Administrative Instructions Grading and Certification Instructions L esson 1: Sc ales and Modes P art A O verview P art B M ajor and Minor Scales P art C M odal Scales P art D O ther Scales Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback L esson 2: R elating Chord Scales to Basic Four Note Chords Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback L esson 3: R elating Chord Scales to Triads, Extended Chords, and Altered Chords Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Examination MU 3323 3 ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis and Performance Considerations for John
    AN ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR JOHN HARBISON’S CONCERTO FOR OBOE, CLARINET, AND STRINGS by KATHERINE BELVIN (Under the Direction of D. RAY MCCLELLAN) ABSTRACT John Harbison is an award-winning and prolific American composer. He has written for almost every conceivable genre of concert performance with styles ranging from jazz to pre-classical forms. The focus of this study, his Concerto for Oboe, Clarinet, and Strings, was premiered in 1985 as a product of a Consortium Commission awarded by the National Endowment of the Arts. The initial discussions for the composition were with oboist Sara Bloom and clarinetist David Shifrin. Harbison’s Concerto for Oboe, Clarinet, and Strings allows the clarinet to finally be introduced to the concerto grosso texture of the Baroque period, for which it was born too late. This document includes biographical information on John Harbison including his life and career, compositional style, and compositional output. It also contains a brief history of the Baroque concerto grosso and how it relates to the Harbison concerto. There is a detailed set-class analysis of each movement and information on performance considerations. The two performers as well as the composer were interviewed to discuss the commission, premieres, and theoretical/performance considerations for the concerto. INDEX WORDS: John Harbison, Concerto for Oboe, Clarinet, and Strings, clarinet concerto, oboe concerto, Baroque concerto grosso, analysis and performance AN ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR JOHN HARBISON’S CONCERTO FOR OBOE, CLARINET, AND STRINGS by KATHERINE BELVIN B.M., Tennessee Technological University, 2004 M.M., University of Cincinnati, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2009 © 2009 Katherine Belvin All Rights Reserved AN ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR JOHN HARBISON’S CONCERTO FOR OBOE, CLARINET, AND STRINGS by KATHERINE BELVIN Major Professor: D.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonatonic Harmonic Structures in Symphonies by Ralph Vaughan Williams and Arnold Bax Cameron Logan Cam.Logan@Gmail.Com
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 12-2-2014 Nonatonic Harmonic Structures in Symphonies by Ralph Vaughan Williams and Arnold Bax Cameron Logan cam.logan@gmail.com Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Logan, Cameron, "Nonatonic Harmonic Structures in Symphonies by Ralph Vaughan Williams and Arnold Bax" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 603. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/603 i Nonatonic Harmonic Structures in Symphonies by Ralph Vaughan Williams and Arnold Bax Cameron Logan, Ph.D. University of Connecticut, 2014 This study explores the pitch structures of passages within certain works by Ralph Vaughan Williams and Arnold Bax. A methodology that employs the nonatonic collection (set class 9-12) facilitates new insights into the harmonic language of symphonies by these two composers. The nonatonic collection has received only limited attention in studies of neo-Riemannian operations and transformational theory. This study seeks to go further in exploring the nonatonic‟s potential in forming transformational networks, especially those involving familiar types of seventh chords. An analysis of the entirety of Vaughan Williams‟s Fourth Symphony serves as the exemplar for these theories, and reveals that the nonatonic collection acts as a connecting thread between seemingly disparate pitch elements throughout the work. Nonatonicism is also revealed to be a significant structuring element in passages from Vaughan Williams‟s Sixth Symphony and his Sinfonia Antartica. A review of the historical context of the symphony in Great Britain shows that the need to craft a work of intellectual depth, simultaneously original and traditional, weighed heavily on the minds of British symphonists in the early twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Describing Species
    DESCRIBING SPECIES Practical Taxonomic Procedure for Biologists Judith E. Winston COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 1999 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data © Winston, Judith E. Describing species : practical taxonomic procedure for biologists / Judith E. Winston, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-231-06824-7 (alk. paper)—0-231-06825-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Biology—Classification. 2. Species. I. Title. QH83.W57 1999 570'.1'2—dc21 99-14019 Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 98765432 p 10 98765432 The Far Side by Gary Larson "I'm one of those species they describe as 'awkward on land." Gary Larson cartoon celebrates species description, an important and still unfinished aspect of taxonomy. THE FAR SIDE © 1988 FARWORKS, INC. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Universal Press Syndicate DESCRIBING SPECIES For my daughter, Eliza, who has grown up (andput up) with this book Contents List of Illustrations xiii List of Tables xvii Preface xix Part One: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Describing the Living World 3 Why Is Species Description Necessary? 4 How New Species Are Described 8 Scope and Organization of This Book 12 The Pleasures of Systematics 14 Sources CHAPTER 2. BIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE 19 Humans as Taxonomists 19 Biological Nomenclature 21 Folk Taxonomy 23 Binomial Nomenclature 25 Development of Codes of Nomenclature 26 The Current Codes of Nomenclature 50 Future of the Codes 36 Sources 39 Part Two: Recognizing Species 41 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • AUTOHARPAUTOHARP 1 SHADRACH PRODUCTIONS, Denver, Colorado USA Chords Aplenty
    Chords Aplenty CChordshords AAplentyplenty C G C F D B E A A C D G C E F B C B F How to choose GREAT chords to play the music you love on diatonic and chromatic AUTOHARPAUTOHARP 1 SHADRACH PRODUCTIONS, Denver, Colorado USA Chords Aplenty ©2013 Lucille Reilly. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced mechanically or electronically, or photocopied without prior permission in writing from the publisher, except for brief quotations included in critical reviews. Shadrach Productions supports the purchase, not the unauthorized repro- duction, of visual and audio works generated by all musicians, composers, authors, and artists in order to propagate the arts for years to come. We encourage you, your friends and colleagues to do the same. First printing: September 2013. Published by: Shadrach Productions P.O. Box 7338 Denver, CO 80207-0338 USA www.thedulcimerlady.com Printed with pride in the USA by Frederic Printing, Aurora, Colorado. ISBN: 978-0-9895233-0-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013909918 Cover design, page design, typesetting, illustrations, and music typography by Lucille Reilly. Editor: Sarah Christmyer Back cover photo: Ian Serff To place orders, please visit www.thedulcimerlady.com. Companion MIDI files are available The symbol “8” at the beginning of a tune or music example means you can hear it on a MIDI file. All MIDI files may be obtained from www.thedulcimerlady.com. ii Chords Aplenty TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chord Names and Symbols (Popular Music) from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Chord names and symbols (popular music) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Various kinds of chord names and symbols are used in different contexts, to represent musical chords. In most genres of popular music, including jazz, pop, and rock, a chord name and the corresponding symbol are typically composed of one or more of the following parts: 1. The root note (e.g. C). CΔ7, or major seventh chord 2. The chord quality (e.g. major, maj, or M). on C Play . 3. The number of an interval (e.g. seventh, or 7), or less often its full name or symbol (e.g. major seventh, maj7, or M7). 4. The altered fifth (e.g. sharp five, or ♯5). 5. An additional interval number (e.g. add 13 or add13), in added tone chords. For instance, the name C augmented seventh, and the corresponding symbol Caug7, or C+7, are both composed of parts 1, 2, and 3. Except for the root, these parts do not refer to the notes which form the chord, but to the intervals they form with respect to the root. For instance, Caug7 indicates a chord formed by the notes C-E-G♯-B♭. The three parts of the symbol (C, aug, and 7) refer to the root C, the augmented (fifth) interval from C to G♯, and the (minor) seventh interval from C to B♭. A set of decoding rules is applied to deduce the missing information. Although they are used occasionally in classical music, these names and symbols are "universally used in jazz and popular music",[1] usually inside lead sheets, fake books, and chord charts, to specify the harmony of compositions.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read Chord Symbols
    HOW TO READ CHORD SYMBOLS The letters telling you WHICH CHORD to play – are called – CHORD QUALITIES. Chord qualities refer to the intervals between notes - which define the chord. The main chord qualities are: • Major, and minor. • Augmented, diminished, and half-diminished. • Dominant. Some of the symbols used for chord quality are similar to those used for interval quality: • m, or min for minor, • M, maj, or no symbol for major, • aug for augmented, • dim for diminished. In addition, however, • Δ is sometimes used for major, instead of the standard M, or maj, • − is sometimes used for minor, instead of the standard m or min, • +, or aug, is used for augmented (A is not used), • o, °, dim, is used for diminished (d is not used), • ø, or Ø is used for half diminished, • dom is used for dominant. Chord qualities are sometimes omitted – you will only see C or D (means to play C Major or D Major). When specified, they appear immediately after the root note. For instance, in the symbol Cm7 (C minor seventh chord) C is the root and m is the chord quality. When there are multiple “qualities” after the chord name – the accordionist will play the first “quality” for the left hand chord and “define” the other “qualities” in the right hand. The table shows the application of these generic and specific rules to interpret some of the main chord symbols. The same rules apply for the analysis of chord names. For each symbol, several formatting options are available. Except for the root, all the other parts of the symbols may be either superscripted or subscripted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Tempered Computer
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons IRCS Technical Reports Series Institute for Research in Cognitive Science November 1994 The Well-tempered Computer Mark Steedman University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports Steedman, Mark, "The Well-tempered Computer" (1994). IRCS Technical Reports Series. 166. https://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/166 University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Technical Report No. IRCS-94-20. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/166 For more information, please contact repository@pobox.upenn.edu. The Well-tempered Computer Abstract The psychological mechanism by which even musically untutored people can comprehend novel melodies resembles that by which they comprehend sentences of their native language. The paper identifies a syntax, a semantics, and a domain or model"." These elements are examined in application to the task of harmonic comprehension and analysis of unaccompanied melody, and a computational theory is argued for. Keywords music; computational analysis; key-analysis; harmony; consonance; grammar of music Comments University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Technical Report No. IRCS-94-20. This technical report is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/166 The Institute For Research In Cognitive Science The Well-tempered Computer by P Mark Steedman E University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Chord Construction
    CHORD CONSTRUCTION While the theory here begins from the beginning, there are many insights which may be useful to even fairly advanced players. Subsequent theory lessons will build upon the theoretical material so even those impatient to learn about complicated chords or reharmonization are advised to not skip this material. The only prerequisite is that you know the names of the notes on your instrument, i.e., you should be able to find a C, C# (Db), D, The keyboard is the easiest instrument to visualize harmony and other music theory on. I recommend that even guitar players get a basic keyboard to help in understanding theory (nowadays you can buy simple ones for next to nothing). It's very rare for a jazz musician, even a drummer, to not have some very basic keyboard skills. The most important first step is to understand major scales. These are the ones we learn to sing as children: Do Re Mi Fa So La Ti Do. These form the basis of western music. C major is the easiest scale to learn since the names of its notes are just letters in the alphabet and there are no sharps or flats. On the keyboard these are just the white notes. C major scale is: C D E F G A B C It is frequently convenient to talk about the notes in a major scale by number. Thus in a C major scale: 1=C, 2=D, 3=E, 4=F, 5=G, 6=A, 7=B. In some instances, which we shall not go into just yet, we can keep counting, even though the notes start to repeat themselves and say 8=C, 9=D, 10=E,11= F, 12=G, 13=A.
    [Show full text]
  • LLOBET S COMPOSITIONS: an ANALYTIC EXAMINATION of SELECTED WORKS by Robert Phillips Abstract the Compositions of Miguel Llobet
    LLOBET S COMPOSITIONS: AN ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF SELECTED WORKS By Robert Phillips Abstract The compositions of Miguel Llobet give a view of the early twentieth century guitar virtuoso as an innovator, whose view of the guitar as a legitimate part of the international classical music scene would be partly dependent on a more sophisticated repertoire. These compositions show a sensitivity to harmonic nuance, texture, and orchestration never before heard on the guitar. Introduction The compositions of Miguel Llobet reveal an evolution of thought and practice from his early, somewhat reactionary, works to his late works that show the influence of the Parisian avant-garde. Analyses of selected works and comparison with works by other composers make clear that Llobet's earliest compositions show a greater sensitivity to harmonic nuance than do those of other guitar composers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The broadening of his harmonic vocabulary takes place in his middle-period works, and finally, his late works embrace the expanded harmonies used by his Impressionist contemporaries and the weakening of functional tonality that goes with them. The influence of Chopin's music on Llobet's early works has been noted by a number of the sources cited in this essay. This leads one to the question of Llobet's guitaristic influences. Surely there must have been individuals among the guitar composers of the previous generation whose works were emulated by the youthful Llobet. The figure of Tárrega emerges. Despite previously cited indications that Llobet's private opinion of Tárrega may have differed considerably from his public opinion, one must make a few mitigating observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mu 3322 Jazz Harmony Ii
    MU 3322 JAZZ HARMONY II Chord Progression EDITION A US Army Element, School of Music 1420 Gator Blvd., Norfolk, Virginia 23521-5170 19 Credit Hours Edition Date: June 1996 SUBCOURSE OVERVIEW This subcourse is designed to teach analysis of chord progression. Contained within this subcourse is information on basic chord analysis and notation, jazz harmony terminology, how chords function, the guidelines of progression, chord substitution, chord patterns, and how to analyze chord progressions. Prerequisites for this subcourse are: MU 1300, Scales and Key Signatures, and MU 3320, Chord Symbols. Also read TC 12-42 to obtain information about chord progression. The words "he," "him," "his," and "men," when used in this publication, represent both the masculine and feminine genders unless otherwise stated. TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE ACTION: You will identify, analyze, and write chord progressions. CONDITION: Given the information in this subcourse. STANDARD: Identify, analyze, and write chord progressions. MU 3322 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subcourse Overview A dministrative Instructions Gradi ng and Certification Instructions Lesson 1: Terminology Part A--Definitions Part B--Diatonic Chord Analysis Part C--Non-Diatonic Chord Analysis Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Lesson 2: Chord Function Part A--Tonic Function Chords Part B--Dominant Function Chords Part C--Subdominant Function Chords Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Lesson 3: Guidelines of Progression Part A--Root Movement of Chords Part B--Supertonic to Dominant Progressions Part C--Subdominant Progressions Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Lesson 4: Chord Substitution Part A--Tonic Substitution MU 3322 2 Part B--Dominant Substitution Part C--Subdominant Substitution Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Lesson 5: Chord Patterns and Turnarounds Part A--Chord Patterns Part B--Turnarounds Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback Lesson 6: How to Analyze Chord Progressions Practical Exercise Answer Key and Feedback EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS 1.
    [Show full text]