DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Lauducci Enlisted in the Army Air Corps in January 1940 And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert Lauducci Enlisted in the Army Air Corps in January 1940 And Robert Lauducci enlisted in the Army Air Corps in January 1940 and served as an airman until June 1980. During World War II, he was an enlisted pilot and eventually an offi cer. This photo shows him as a captain in Manila, the Philippines, on Oct. 8, 1946. Photo by 2nd Lt. Joseph Bujalski Joseph Lt. 2nd by Photo 14 Wingman Magazine ︱ January 2015 By James R. Lauducci t was during my 24 years as an Air Maintaining the B-18A was hard work e next morning, my uncle reported I Force officer that I developed a but not overly challenging. Life was to the hangar as directed and drew from close relationship with my uncle, Rob- routine until his squadron transferred supply a new Norden bombsight and a ert A. Lauducci, now approaching his to Langley Field, Va., in the fall of 1940. .45 pistol. 95th birthday. During the spring of 1941, my uncle’s “What amazed me about the whole His is a unique story in many ways. squadron initiated a call for ve vol- a air was [that] yesterday, I couldn’t get My uncle was an engine mechanic, a unteers to train as bombardiers. is a screw from Sergeant Rose without sign- bombardier, and a pilot. He was a private, was a great opportunity for promotion ing my life away. Now, Rose hands me private rst class, sta sergeant, ight because most of the bombardiers were the top secret bombsight and a .45 and o cer, and then a second lieutenant all sergeants and he was a private rst class. doesn’t even ask my name,” recounted the way up through lieutenant colonel. He volunteered and was selected. my uncle in a 1993 letter. He ew 15 di erent types of aircraft and e new bombardier trainees learned Later that same morning, the bombar- believes he is the only individual to be their trade on the hangar oor and then diers left for March Field in California. dual-rated as a bombardier and a pilot. transitioned to the B-18s to train on the My uncle carried the Norden bombsight Born in Syracuse, N.Y., on June 30, Langley ranges. ey were all assigned to and his .45 with him. e rst stopover 1920, the fourth of six children, my the 22nd Bombardment Group, the “Red was Barksdale Field, La., to refuel. Just uncle enlisted in the Army Air Corps Raiders” of World War II. While this was after touchdown, the right engine quit in January 1940 at Mitchell Field, N.Y. going on, new Martin B-26 Marauders on their aircraft. ey found themselves After basic training, he attended airframe started to dribble in to Langley and the in a brand-new airplane with no spare and engine school at Roosevelt Field on new bombardiers made the transition. parts available—my uncle stuck with a Long Island, along with many other new e bombardiers continued bombing top secret piece of equipment. enlisted men. Following graduation, he runs on the Langley ranges until Dec. 7, At rst, the pilot directed my uncle to was assigned to a ight line maintenance 1941. ey learned of the attack on Pearl stay on the airplane with the bombsight. crew for the Douglas B-18A Bolo bomber. Harbor while standing in the hangar. e crew would bring him food. After Wingman Magazine︱ January 2015 15 the rst night, the pilot took my uncle to the local quartermaster and directed the quartermaster to secure the bombsight and the .45. My uncle was now free to relax and wait for the spare parts to Photo by 2nd Lt. Joseph Bujalski Joseph Lt. 2nd by Photo arrive. All he would tell me about this episode is that he had a fabulous time in nearby Shreveport. Several days later, the bombardiers rejoined the 22nd BG at March Field. In preparation for deployment to the Paci c theater, they continued practicing bombing runs at Muroc Bombing and Gunnery Range in southern California (now Edwards Air Force Base). Before the group deployed to the Paci c, my uncle was ordered to report to pre ight school for pilot training. Lauducci stands in front of The Liquidator, a B-17G he fl ew shortly after World War II at’s because back in June 1941, ended, at Kiangwan Airfi eld in Shanghai, Nov. 4, 1946. He shuttled senior military of- Public Law 99 took e ect, authorizing fi cials and diplomats around the Pacifi c Theater in the modifi ed bomber. It featured a private area and bed for the VIP passengers in its gutted bomb bay. the training of enlisted pilots in the Signal Corps. Originally meant to ll essential, the aircraft, the ground crew asked me appointment as a second lieutenant, yet unglamorous, roles such as hauling about fuel requirements, thinking I e ective on the following day. He was cargo and passengers and instructing other was the crew chief. After refueling, the subsequently selected to attend the pilots, the enlisted pilots ended up ying ground crew would ask for the pilot to Central Test Pilot School at Kelly Field, ghters, medium bombers, and transports sign for it, because only o cers could Texas, graduating on Sept. 30, 1944, in the war, as well as conducting medical sign for fuel. I couldn’t convince them and was assigned to Hill Field, Utah. evacuations and photoreconnaissance that I was the pilot, so I’d point to any As a test pilot, my uncle ew various missions. ey also served as test pilots. nearby o cer as a likely candidate. e platforms including four-engine Boeing My uncle’s ight training consisted base operations o cer would nally B-17 Flying Fortresses and Consolidated of a pre ight course, primary ight B-24 Liberators; twin-engine North school, basic ight school, and nally American Aviation B-25 Mitchells, Lock- twin-engine advanced ying training at heed B-34 Venturas, and Douglas C-47 Columbus Field, Miss. Upon graduation, Skytrains; and single-engine Bell P-39 he became a ight o cer with the rank Airacobras and Curtiss P-40 Warhawks. of sta sergeant pilot. He was assigned He was fortunate to serve under former to the newly opened Rome Air Depot enlisted pilot Maj. Fred O. Tyler who in New York. Following a short time at was chief of ight test. My uncle spent the depot, he was transferred to Olmsted the nal year of the war as a test pilot. Army Air eld (now Harrisburg Airport) He was then selected to be the personal in Middletown, Pa., where he ew the pilot for Brig. Gen. Franklin O. Carroll, AT-6 light attack aircraft. At Olmsted, who became commanding general of the the AT-6 served as an advanced trainer resolve the problem and accepted my Paci c Air Service Command in Manila, for new Army Air Corps pilots. signature. e Air Corps didn’t know the Philippines. In that role, my uncle ew My uncle proudly served as a sta how to handle us when we were transits.” a specially modi ed B-17: e bomb bay sergeant pilot for 11 months, conduct- at changed in summer 1943 when was gutted and turned into a VIP suite, ing many cross-country ights. “On Congress passed a law mandating that which was a private room with a bed. many of the cross-country trips, I ran all pilots receive commissions. us, on My uncle’s rst orientation ight with into the problem of who would sign for Aug. 3, 1943, my uncle was discharged Carroll was a round-trip from Manila to the fuel,” he recalled. “When we exited from military service to accept an Tokyo. He ew throughout the Paci c 16 Wingman Magazine ︱ January 2015 a series of oblique turns) 200 miles to the their di erences there wasn’t any chance north, which would give the airplane a of a resolution, so he picked up his papers considerable tailwind. On entering the and discontinued the meeting.” storm, lightning constantly ashed all On Nov. 4, 1946, my uncle was again around them. e navigator calculated in Shanghai with Davis. e latter was a 125 mph hour tailwind. ey made scheduled to meet with General of the it through the storm and landed in Army Douglas MacArthur, who was Shanghai with daylight to spare. supreme Allied commander, Japan, at After that ordeal, Davis developed an the time, in Tokyo. While the original appreciation for my uncle’s ying skills. ight plan called for a direct ight, once Shortly thereafter, Davis was invited to airborne, Davis asked my uncle to y Nanking by General of the Army George over Hiroshima, where the rst atomic C. Marshall, who, as the President’s bomb had exploded some 15 months special representative to China, was earlier, for a look at the city. scheduled to meet with senior Chinese After overflying Hiroshima and Communist and Nationalist leadership taking pictures, my uncle received eater to such interesting locations as Nanking and Shanghai in the Far East; Brisbane, Cloncurry, Darwin, Sydney, and Tuggerah in Australia; Palawan in the Philippines; and the islands of Biak, Guam, Moratai, New Caledonia, Bujalski Joseph Lt. 2nd by Photo Okinawa, and Yap. In September 1946, the modi ed B-17 and crew began three months of tempo- rary duty with the State Department, reporting to Donald B. Davis, who was eld commissioner for China and Eastern Asia. My uncle had several interesting stories to tell me about those missions. His rst ight in support of Davis was an inspection visit to Shanghai on Oct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doolittle and Eaker Said He Was the Greatest Air Commander of All Time
    Doolittle and Eaker said he was the greatest air commander of all time. LeMayBy Walter J. Boyne here has never been anyone like T Gen. Curtis E. LeMay. Within the Air Force, he was extraordinarily successful at every level of com- mand, from squadron to the entire service. He was a brilliant pilot, preeminent navigator, and excel- lent bombardier, as well as a daring combat leader who always flew the toughest missions. A master of tactics and strategy, LeMay not only played key World War II roles in both Europe and the Pacific but also pushed Strategic Air Command to the pinnacle of great- ness and served as the architect of victory in the Cold War. He was the greatest air commander of all time, determined to win as quickly as possible with the minimum number of casualties. At the beginning of World War II, by dint of hard work and train- ing, he was able to mold troops and equipment into successful fighting units when there were inadequate resources with which to work. Under his leadership—and with support produced by his masterful relations with Congress—he gained such enor- During World War II, Gen. Curtis E. LeMay displayed masterful tactics and strategy that helped the US mous resources for Strategic Air prevail first in Europe and then in the Pacific. Even Command that American opponents Soviet officers and officials acknowledged LeMay’s were deterred. brilliant leadership and awarded him a military deco- “Tough” is always the word that ration (among items at right). springs to mind in any consideration of LeMay.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bombsight War: Norden Vs. Sperry
    The bombsight war: Norden vs. Sperry As the Norden bombsight helped write World War II’s aviation history, The less-known Sperry technology pioneered avionics for all-weather flying Contrary to conventional wisdom, Carl three axes, and was often buffeted by air turbulence. L. Norden -- inventor of the classified Norden The path of the dropped bomb was a function of the bombsight used in World War I! -- did not acceleration of gravity and the speed of the plane, invent the only U.S. bombsight of the war. He modified by altitude wind direction, and the ballistics invented one of two major bombsights used, of the specific bomb. The bombardier's problem was and his was not the first one in combat. not simply an airborne version of the artillery- That honor belongs to the top secret gunner's challenge of hitting a moving target; it product of an engineering team at involved aiming a moving gun with the equivalent of Sperry Gyroscope Co., Brooklyn, N. Y. The a variable powder charge aboard a platform evading Sperry bombsight out did the Norden in gunfire from enemy fighters. speed, simplicity of operation, and eventual Originally, bombing missions were concluded technological significance. It was the first by bombardier-pilot teams using pilot-director bombsight built with all-electronic servo systems, so it responded indicator (PDI) signals. While tracking the target, the bombardier faster than the Norden's electromechanical controls. It was much would press buttons that moved a needle on the plane's control simpler to learn to master than the Norden bombsight and in the panel, instructing the pilot to turn left or right as needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Agent-Based Simulation of the Introduction of New Technologies in Air Traffic Management
    Evolutionary Agent-Based Simulation of the Introduction of New Technologies in Air Traffic Management Logan Yliniemi Adrian Agogino Kagan Tumer Oregon State University UCSC at NASA Ames Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA Moffett Field, CA, USA Corvallis, OR, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT new piece of technology to fit into this framework is a challenging Accurate simulation of the effects of integrating new technologies process in which many unforeseen consequences. Thus, the abil- into a complex system is critical to the modernization of our anti- ity to simulate new technologies within an air traffic management quated air traffic system, where there exist many layers of interact- framework is of the utmost importance. ing procedures, controls, and automation all designed to cooperate One approach is to create a highly realistic simulation for the with human operators. Additions of even simple new technologies entire system [13, 14], but in these cases, every technology in the may result in unexpected emergent behavior due to complex hu- system must be modeled, and their interactions must be understood man/machine interactions. One approach is to create high-fidelity beforehand. If this understanding is lacking, it may be difficult human models coming from the field of human factors that can sim- to integrate them into such a framework [16]. With a sufficiently ulate a rich set of behaviors. However, such models are difficult to complex system, missed interactions become a near-certainty. produce, especially to show unexpected emergent behavior com- Another approach is to use an evolutionary approach in which a ing from many human operators interacting simultaneously within series of simple agents evolves a model the complex behavior of the a complex system.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Technology That Changed Warfare - Radar and Bombsights Sean Foley Johnson & Wales University - Providence, [email protected]
    Johnson & Wales University ScholarsArchive@JWU Academic Symposium of Undergraduate College of Arts & Sciences Scholarship 2-2011 World War II Technology that Changed Warfare - Radar and Bombsights Sean Foley Johnson & Wales University - Providence, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/ac_symposium Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Repository Citation Foley, Sean, "World War II Technology that Changed Warfare - Radar and Bombsights" (2011). Academic Symposium of Undergraduate Scholarship. 8. https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/ac_symposium/8 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ScholarsArchive@JWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Academic Symposium of Undergraduate Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarsArchive@JWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. World War II Technology that Changed Aviation Warfare Radar and Bombsights http://steveblank.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/wurzburg-reise-radar.jpg http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1246/4728554459_97034bb3a9_z.jpg Sean Foley SCI3050 Science & Civilization Final Project Introduction Two pieces of technology that stand out in the aviation history of World War II are Radar and Bombsights. Both technologies played a crucial role in the defensive and offensive strategies of all the countries involved. During World War II Radio Detecting and Ranging or RADAR, saw its first use in combat operations. (“Early”) Although radar came of age during the war (Goebel) it is often referred to as the weapon that won the war and the invention that changed the world! (“Radar”) Radar was a technology that allowed land bases to detect incoming aircraft and direct their anti-air defenses in the direction of the incoming aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombing the European Axis Powers a Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945
    Inside frontcover 6/1/06 11:19 AM Page 1 Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 Air University Press Team Chief Editor Carole Arbush Copy Editor Sherry C. Terrell Cover Art and Book Design Daniel M. Armstrong Composition and Prepress Production Mary P. Ferguson Quality Review Mary J. Moore Print Preparation Joan Hickey Distribution Diane Clark NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page i Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 RICHARD G. DAVIS Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2006 NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page ii Air University Library Cataloging Data Davis, Richard G. Bombing the European Axis powers : a historical digest of the combined bomber offensive, 1939-1945 / Richard G. Davis. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-148-1 1. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations. 2. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations––Statistics. 3. United States. Army Air Forces––History––World War, 1939- 1945. 4. Great Britain. Royal Air Force––History––World War, 1939-1945. 5. Bombing, Aerial––Europe––History. I. Title. 940.544––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Book and CD-ROM cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page iii Contents Page DISCLAIMER .
    [Show full text]
  • The SAC Mentality: the Origins of Strategic Air Command's
    Feature The SAC Mentality The Origins of Strategic Air Command’s Organizational Culture, 1948–51 Dr. Melvin G. Deaile* Air power can attack the vital centers of the opposing country directly, com- pletely destroying and paralyzing them. The basis of air force power is the bombardment airplane or bomber. —Gen William “Billy” Mitchell “KLAXON! KLAXON! KLAXON!” When public address systems echoed these words at Strategic Air Command (SAC) bases across the United States, red lights flashed and “SAC warriors” scrambled to their *An earlier version of this article received second prize in the 2005 Cold War Essay Contest sponsored by the John A. Adams ’71 Center for Military History and Strategic Analysis at the Virginia Military Institute. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carry- ing the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, theAir and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. March–April 2015 Air & Space Power Journal | 48 Feature Deaile The SAC Mentality awaiting bombers.1 As pilots frantically brought their nuclear-armed planes to life, navigators decoded cryptic emergency action messages to determine if the alert response was an actual launch against the Soviet Union or just another exercise. SAC warriors never executed their preplanned missions against America’s Cold War enemy, but for over 40 years, the possibility that the United States could and might do so served to deter a possible Soviet attack against the American homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • National Museum of the Pacific War Nimitz Education and Research
    National Museum of the Pacific War Nimitz Education and Research Center Fredericksburg, Texas Interview with Mr. Robert Wesley Clum Date of Interview: April 22, 2010 National Museum of the Pacific War Fredericksburg, Texas Interview with Mr. Robert Wesley Clum Interview in progress. Mark Cunningham: This is Mark Cunningham (cough); I’m an volunteer oral historian for the Museum of the Pacific [War] in Fredericksburg. Today is April 22, 2010. I’m interviewing Mr. Robert Wesley Clum. I am at his home in Houston, Texas. Mr. Clum was a member of the Army Air Force and he served with the 484th Bomber Group, the 827th Bomb Squadron. (Pause) Okay, Bob, right off the bat...when were you born and where? Mr. Clum: I was born in Joplin, Missouri in...on August 10th, 1924. Mark Cunningham: Alright, so you are... Mr. Clum: Eighty-five years old. Mark Cunningham: Eighty-five years old. And...you...you grew up in Joplin? Mr. Clum: No, I...my folks lived there when I was still a baby. Mark Cunningham: Okay, what were your folks’ names? Mr. Clum: Uh, John Clum and Doris Cox...is...is her maiden name. Mark Cunningham: Now did you have any siblings? Mr. Clum: Uh, not at that time. Well, it’s...my family is kind of a mixed deal; when I was nine years old, my folks separated and each remarried and they got a...my father’s side...he had a son and on my mother’s side...she had a daughter, so I have a half-brother; I believe he passed away and then I Page 1 of 22 have a sister.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombing the European Axis Powers a Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945
    Inside frontcover 6/1/06 11:19 AM Page 1 Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 Air University Press Team Chief Editor Carole Arbush Copy Editor Sherry C. Terrell Cover Art and Book Design Daniel M. Armstrong Composition and Prepress Production Mary P. Ferguson Quality Review Mary J. Moore Print Preparation Joan Hickey Distribution Diane Clark NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page i Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 RICHARD G. DAVIS Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2006 NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page ii Air University Library Cataloging Data Davis, Richard G. Bombing the European Axis powers : a historical digest of the combined bomber offensive, 1939-1945 / Richard G. Davis. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-148-1 1. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations. 2. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations––Statistics. 3. United States. Army Air Forces––History––World War, 1939- 1945. 4. Great Britain. Royal Air Force––History––World War, 1939-1945. 5. Bombing, Aerial––Europe––History. I. Title. 940.544––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Book and CD-ROM cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page iii Contents Page DISCLAIMER .
    [Show full text]
  • Endgame in the Pacific Complexity, Strategy, and the B-29
    AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Endgame in the Pacific Complexity, Strategy, and the B-29 G. SCOTT GORMAN Major, USAF Fairchild Paper Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112–6615 February 2000 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gorman, G. Scott, 1963– Endgame in the Pacific / G. Scott Gorman. p. cm. “Fairchild paper.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-075-2 1. World War, 1939–1945—Technology. 2. World War, 1939–1945—Campaigns—Pacific Area. 3. World War, 1939–1945—Cam- paigns—Japan. 4. World War, 1939-1945—Aerial operations, American. 5. B-29 bomber. I. Title D810.S2 G57 1999 940.54’26—dc21 99-058172 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ix ABSTRACT . xi INTRODUCTION . xiii 1 COMPLEXITY AND TECHNOLOGY IN WAR . 1 Notes . 5 2 ENDGAME AGAINST JAPAN: THE STRATEGIC PROBLEM . 9 Notes . 12 3 DOCTRINAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT . 13 Notes . 17 4 APPLYING A TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTION . 21 Notes . 25 5 UNCERTAINTY AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES . 27 Notes . 32 6 TECHNOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ADAPTATION . 35 Notes . 42 CONCLUSION . 45 APPENDIX . 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 51 INDEX . 63 iii Photographs A Hurricane-Hunting Superfortress . 5 A High-Flying Superfortress . 11 A Superfortress Over Japan . 17 iv Foreword Endgame in the Pacific: Complexity, Strategy, and the B-29, by Maj G.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Air Warfare
    Strategic Air Warfare An Interview with Generals Curtis E. LeMay, Leon W. Johnson, David A. Burchinal, and Jack J. Catton Edited with an Introduction by Richard H. Kohn and Joseph P. Harahan Office of Air Force History United States Air Force Washington, D.C., 1988 The Cover B-52 Stratofortress begins low-level penetration mission in this painting by Robert Benjamin. The B-52 has been one of the most visible instruments of American strategic air power since the mid-1950s. Courtesy USAF Art Collection Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData Strategic air warfare. (USAF warrior studies) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs. no.: D 301.96:st8/2 1. Bombing, Aerial-United States. 2. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial oper- ations, American. 3. Korean War, 1950-1953-Aerial operations, American. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961-1975-Aerial operations, American. 5. United States. Air Force-History. 6. Generals-United States-Interviews. I. Le May, Curtis E. 11. Kohn, Richard H. 111. Harahan, Joseph P. IV. United States. Air Force. Office of Air Force History. V. Series UG703.277 1988 358.4'2'0973 88-600389 ISBN 0-912799-56-0 / Project Warrior Studies are published by the Office of Air Force History. The views expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the United States Air Force or the Department of Defense. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 iv Foreword Strategic Air Warfare is part of a continuing series of historical volumes produced by the Office of Air Force History in direct support of Project Warrior.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing the Drone, Reinventing the Navy1919–1939 Angelina Long Callahan
    Naval War College Review Volume 67 Article 8 Number 3 Summer 2014 Reinventing the Drone, Reinventing the Navy1919–1939 Angelina Long Callahan Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Callahan, Angelina Long (2014) "Reinventing the Drone, Reinventing the Navy1919–1939," Naval War College Review: Vol. 67 : No. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol67/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Callahan: Reinventing the Drone, Reinventing the Navy1919–1939 R EINVenting the DRONE, REINVenting THE NAVY 1919–1939 Angelina Long Callahan nvention is often perceived as an isolated event, attributable to a momentous “first” or to a single, patent-holding inventor� However, rather than questioning Iwhat qualified as the first drone aircraft or to whom the title as its “inventor” belongs, this article maps out the winding uncertainties of technical evolution— exploring how seemingly failed projects laid groundwork for the U�s� Navy’s first successful radio-controlled drone aircraft� Situated as they are among a cluster of interwar emerging technologies, drones provide an instructive case study through which to consider how the U�s� Navy’s research-and-development (R&D) communities function as a strategic asset� When the availability of one subcomponent can jeopardize an entire research project, such factors as institutional stability, the circulation of ideas, and will- ingness to reevaluate naval doctrine become critical to national security� So too does the ability of experts to recognize a (perhaps temporary) dead end when they face one� This article will flesh out, for this case, the actors and activities of innovation, emphasizing how the collaborative Dr.
    [Show full text]