Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans Borders Committee Item 3 | June 26, 2020
1
Previous Actions
• July 12 - Board direction to develop a Regional Plan that meets federal and state laws/targets, assumes realistic and transparent revenues, utilizes the 5 Big Moves and Complete Corridors model, and prioritizes corridors previously scheduled for investment such as SR 78, 52, 67, and 94/125. • September 27 - Board approves $40 million for Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans/Advanced Planning over the next 5 years.
2 2
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 1 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 Why Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans (CMCPs)? • Integrated multimodal transportation corridor planning, aligned with state goals and funding • Details Complete Corridors included in the Regional Plan • CMCPs suggested by California Transportation Commission to be competitive for SB1 and other state and federal funding
3 3
North Coast Corridor Plan – First Generation CMCP
4 4
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 2 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 Fully Integrated CMCP
5 5
CMCPs - Phase One
1. Purple Line/I-805 2. Blue Line/I-5 South 3. High Speed Transit/SR 52/SR 67 4. SPRINTER/Palomar Airport Road/SR 78 5. Central Mobility Hub and Connections
6 6
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 3 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 CMCP Work Underway
• Workshop held with Caltrans District 11 • Teams formed and work plans established • Geographical areas defined • Issues and opportunities statements drafted for discussion
7 7
CMCP Draft Study Area Boundaries 1. Purple Line/I-805/ Blue Line/I-5 South 2. Sea to Santee (SR 52) 3. San Vicente Corridor (SR 67) 4. North County Corridor (SR 78) 5. Central Mobility Hub and Connections
8 8
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 4 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 Policy Considerations 1. Public safety and security 2. Preserve existing transportation infrastructure 3. Multimodal focus 4. Economic development and goods movement 5. System operations and efficiency congestion relief 6. Low income and disadvantaged communities 7. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions/vehicle miles traveled 8. Improve air quality and public health 9. Active transportation and micromobility 10.Prevent residential and small business displacement 11.Increase supply of affordable housing 12.Improve jobs-housing balance
Note: Changes since February 21, 2020 Transportation Committee meeting shown in red.
9 9
Implementation Schedule
Spring Summer/Fall Fall/Winter Spring/Summer 2020 2020 2020/2021 2021
Develop Data Community Draft and Work Plans Analysis Outreach Final Plans
Transportation Committee Check-ins • Summer/Fall 2020 Present data analysis and stakeholder engagement findings for review and discussion • Fall/Winter 2020/2021 Conduct community outreach • Spring/Summer 2021 Present draft and final CMCPs
10 10
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 5 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 Phase 2 CMCPs
1. North Coast Corridor/I-5 North 2. High Speed Transit/I-8 3. High Speed Transit/I-15 4. High Speed Transit/SR 56 5. High Speed Transit/SR 94 6. High Speed Transit/SR125 7. Airport to Airport (Cross Border Xpress to San Diego Airport)
11 11
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 6 Agenda Item No. 3 | June 26, 2020 Count everyone once, only once, and in the right place
2020 Census Outreach Update
Borders Committee Item #4 | June 26, 2020
1
U.S. Census Bureau Timeline
Invitations Sent Data Collection
In Person Follow‐Up
Counts to President
3/1 3/31 4/30 5/30 6/29 7/29 8/28 9/27 10/27 11/26 12/26 1/25 2/24 3/26 4/25
2
2
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 1 Agenda Item No. 4 | June 26, 2020 Activity Locations
3
3
HTC Impressions Reported Through May 31, 2020
Hard to Count Community (HTC) Impressions
Immigrants & Refugees 1,255,969 Asian-Americans & Pacific Islanders (AAPI) 1,038,878 Limited-English Proficient Individuals and Families 383,940 Seniors/Older Adults 217,604 Latinos 215,061 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) 127,475 Middle-Eastern and North Africans (MENA) 43,684 African Americans 30,017 Low Broadband subscription rates and limited or no access 20,336 Veterans 12,983 Homeless Individuals and Families 6,368 Farmworkers 2,664 People with Disabilities 2,189 Native Americans & Tribal Communities 1,041
4
4
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 2 Agenda Item No. 4 | June 26, 2020 Language Impressions Reported Through May 31, 2020
Language Impressions
Spanish 104,350 Vietnamese 36,351 Chinese 18,150 Mandarin 18,119 Arabic 6,652 Tagalog 3,127 Cantonese 1,816 Farsi 921 Hmong 364 Other Language(s) 229 Filipino 103 Japanese 40 Korean 20 Hindi 5 Armenian 2 Russian 2
5
5
Self-Response Rates As of June 7, 2020 Poway 77.7% Carlsbad 72.8% San Marcos 70.1% Santee 69.1% La Mesa 68.6% Encinitas 67.9% Oceanside 67.8% San Diego 67.2% El Cajon 67.2% Escondido 66.9% Chula Vista 66.8% Countywide 66.6% Lemon Grove 66.1% Vista 66.0% Solana Beach 63.9% Statewide 61.9%
National City 62.1% Nationwide 60.7% Imperial Beach 59.5% Coronado 57.7% Del Mar 53.0%
6
6
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 3 Agenda Item No. 4 | June 26, 2020 Response Rates
7
7
Count everyone once, only once, and in the right place
my2020census.gov Spanish: 844-468-2020 English: 844-330-2020
Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat [email protected]
8
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 4 Agenda Item No. 4 | June 26, 2020 2019 CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA BORDER CROSSING AND TRADE STATISTICS
Borders Committee June 26, 2020
1
CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA BORDER CROSSINGS
LAND PORTS OF ENTRY (POEs) From west to east:
. San Ysidro–Puerta México/Ped West–El Chaparral . Cross Border Xpress (CBX) . Otay Mesa–Mesa de Otay I . Tecate–Tecate . Calexico West–Mexicali I . Calexico East–Mexicali II . Andrade–Los Algodones
2 2
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 1 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 BORDER CROSSING & TRADE STATISTICS OVERVIEW
• Northbound individual crossings by mode – Pedestrians – Passengers (total occupants) in private vehicles (POVs)
• Northbound vehicle crossings by type – POVs – Trucks
• Trade value moved via truck – Otay Mesa‐Mesa de Otay – Tecate‐Tecate – Calexico East‐Mexicali I
3 3
BIG PICTURE: HOW MANY CROSSINGS OCCUR?
Total Northbound Individual Crossings and Share by POE (pedestrians, POV passengers, and bus passengers)
San Ysidro-Puerta México/Ped West-El Chaparral 2019 Total = 77.2 M Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay (from Mexico to the U.S.)
Calexico West-Mexicali I
48% 19% 16% 8% Calexico East-Mexicali II
Tecate-Tecate 4% 3% 2%
Andrade-Los Algodones
Cross Border Xpress (CBX)
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
4 4
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 2 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 BIG PICTURE: VOLUME OF CROSSINGS IN CONTEXT
People Crossings through California‐Baja California POEs and Passengers at the Top 3 Busiest California Airports (2019)
180 170 M
160 154 M
Millions 140 San Diego International Airport (SAN) 120
100
80 San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
60
40 Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) 20
0 Total crossings through Total Airport Passengers California-Baja California POEs at the Top 3 Airports in CA
Note: Total border crossings represent a bidirectional estimate derived by doubling the observed northbound pedestrian and personal vehicle passenger crossings.
Source: 2019 Passenger Data as reported by airports to the Airports Council International (ACI)
5 5
BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound Individual Crossings by Mode
All California‐Baja California POEs 100 90 77.2 80 70 Pedestrian 60 Crossings 50 POV Passenger
Millions 40 Crossings 30 Total Individual 20 Crossings 10 0
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
6 6
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 3 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound Individual Crossings by Mode
50 Imperial County POEs 40
30 21.1 20 Millions Pedestrian 10 Crossings
0 POV Passenger Crossings 75 San Diego County POEs 56.1 60 Total Individual 45 Crossings 30 Millions 15 0
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
7 7
BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound POV Crossings by POE
40 Andrade –Los Algodones 35 31.4
30 Calexico East –Mexicali II
25 Calexico West –Mexicali I 20 Millions Tecate –Tecate 15
10 Otay Mesa –Mesa de Otay 5 San Ysidro‐Puerta 0 México/Ped West‐El Chaparral
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
8 8
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 4 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound POV Crossings by POE 14 12 Imperial County POEs 10 8.8 Andrade –Los Algodones 8 6 Calexico East –Mexicali II 4
Millions Calexico West –Mexicali I 2 Total POVs 0
30 San Diego County POEs 22.5 25 Tecate –Tecate 20 15 Otay Mesa –Mesa de Otay
10 San Ysidro‐Puerta México/Ped Millions 5 West‐El Chaparral 0 Total POVs
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
9 9
BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound Truck Crossings by POE
1.6 1.4 M 1.4
1.2 Calexico East – Mexicali II 1.0
0.8 Tecate – Tecate
Millions 0.6 Otay Mesa – 0.4 Mesa de Otay I 0.2 Total Trucks 0.0
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
10 10
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 5 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 BIG PICTURE: CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA
Total Northbound Truck Crossings by POE 0.6 Imperial County POEs 0.5 0.4 M
0.3 Calexico East – Mexicali II Millions 0.2 Total Trucks 0.0 1.5 San Diego County POEs 1.0 M 1.0 Tecate – Tecate
0.5 Otay Mesa – Mesa de Otay I Millions
0.0 Total Trucks
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
11 11
BORDER CROSSING TRENDLINE ANALYSIS
Northbound Pedestrian Crossing Trendlines
San Diego County POEs Imperial County POEs 14 14
12 12 Millions Millions
10 10
8 8
6 6
4 4
2 2
0 0
San Ysidro-Puerta México/Ped West-El Chaparral Calexico West - Mexicali I Otay Mesa - Mesa de Otay Tecate - Tecate Calexico East - Mexicali II
Cross Border Xpress (CBX) Andrade - Los Algodones
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
12 12
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 6 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 MODE SHARE OF TOTAL INDIVIDUAL CROSSINGS
San Ysidro – Puerta México/ Cross Border Otay Mesa – Tecate – Ped West – El Chaparral Xpress (CBX) Mesa De Otay Tecate
30% 24% 32%
100% 68% 76% 70%
Calexico West – Calexico East – Andrade – Mexicali I Mexicali II Los Algodones
29% 7% 43% 57% 71% 93%
Pedestrian Crossings
Note: Areas are proportionate based on total crossings through each POE in 2019. Vehicle Passenger Crossings
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
13 13
U.S. –MEXICO TRADE THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA –BAJA CALIFORNIA BORDER (2019)
14 14
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 7 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 CALIFORNIA CROSSBORDER TRADE VIA TRUCK
Total Bilateral Trade Value via Truck through Commercial Land POEs $65.86 B $70 1.6
$60 1.4 1.2 $50 1.0 $40 0.8 $30 0.6 millions) (in $20
Trade Value (in (in billions) Value Trade 0.4 Number of Trucks Northbound Number of Trucks $10 0.2
$0 0.0
Otay Mesa - Mesa de Otay Calexico East - Mexicali II Tecate - Tecate Total NB Truck Crossings
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
15 15
WHAT PRODUCTS MOVE ACROSS OUR BORDER?
Audio and Visual Equipment Automobiles and Automotive Medical Equipment and Supplies Components
Navigational Measuring/ Aerospace Equipment Control Instruments Produce and Parts
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ‐ U.S.A. Trade (Commodity Data)
16 16
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 8 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 SIGNIFICANCE OF U.S. ‐ MEXICO TRADE
MEXICO RANKS AS #1 OVERALL TRADE PARTNER FOR THE U.S. IN 2019
• Total U.S.‐Mexico trade: $614.5 B – $256.4 B in Exports – $358.1 B in Imports
• #1 or #2 export market for 26 states – 30 states exported more than $1 B – 15 states exported more than $3 B – 8 states exported more than $5 B
• California Exports to Mexico: $27.8 B States where Mexico is #1 or #2 Export Market
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ‐ U.S.A. Trade (Foreign Trade Statistics)
17 17
IMPACTS OF COVID‐19 ON BORDER CROSSING VOLUMES
18 18
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 9 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 DECREASES IN BORDER CROSSING VOLUMES
2,500,000 Calexico East‐Mexicali II Northbound 2,000,000 Tecate‐Tecate Pedestrian Crossings Andrade‐Los Algodones 1,500,000 April 2020: Cross Border Xpress (CBX) 1,000,000 ‐76% below monthly average Otay Mesa‐Mesa de Otay 500,000 Calexico West‐Mexicali I
‐ San Ysidro‐Puerta México/ Ped West‐El Chaparral
Northbound 3,000,000 Andrade‐Los Algodones POV Crossings Tecate‐Tecate 2,000,000 Calexico East‐Mexicali II April 2020: Calexico West‐Mexicali I ‐53% below monthly average 1,000,000 Otay Mesa‐Mesa de Otay
San Ysidro‐Puerta México/ 0 Ped West‐El Chaparral
Northbound 150,000
Truck Crossings 100,000 Tecate‐Tecate April 2020: 50,000 Calexico East‐Mexicali II ‐26% below monthly average Otay Mesa‐Mesa de Otay 0 Jul Jul Jan Jan Jan Jun Jun Oct Oct Feb Apr Feb Apr Feb Apr Sep Sep Dec Dec Aug Aug Nov Nov Mar Mar Mar May May Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics 2018 2019 2020 19 19
CURRENT CONSIDERATIONS
TRAVEL • Restrictions for “non‐essential” crossborder trips went into effect March 21, 2020 and were extended until at least July 21, 2020. Who is considered an “essential” traveler? Citizens and lawful permanent residents returning to the U.S. or traveling for: o medical purposes o to attend educational institutions o to work in the U.S. o emergency response and public health purposes (e.g., government officials or emergency responders entering the U.S.) o lawful cross‐border trade (e.g., truck drivers) o official government travel or diplomatic travel o military‐related travel or operations TRADE • United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) will enter into force on July 1, 2020.
Source: U.S. Embassy (https://mx.usembassy.gov/travel‐restrictions‐fact‐sheet/)
20 20
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 10 Agenda Item No. 5 | June 26, 2020 CALIFORNIA – BAJA CALIFORNIA 2021 BORDER MASTER PLAN
BORDERS COMMITTEE JOINT SESSION
JOSE MARQUEZ, CALTRANS JUNE 26, 2020
1
What is it?
• Binational, comprehensive approach
• Commissioned by the U.S.–Mexico Joint Working Committee (JWC)
• Led by Caltrans and SIDURT (formerly SIDUE)
• Coordinates planning and delivery of Port of Entry (POE) and transportation infrastructure projects serving POEs in the California–Baja California region
2
2
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 1 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 Improve coordination of POE and connecting Why is it transportation infrastructure needed? projects
Institutionalize dialogue among local, state, regional, and federal stakeholders in the U.S. and Mexico
Establish a binational, comprehensive approach to plan and deliver projects as one system
3
3
Decision-Making Structure
Policy Advisory Committee (PAC)
Technical Working Group (TWG)
Interested Parties by Invitation
4
4
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 2 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 17 U.S. Agencies Federal State Regional & Local
5
5
14 Mexican Agencies Federal State Regional & Local
Aduanas
6
6
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 3 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 2008 BMP: Key Accomplishments
Established BMP Decision-making Structure
Produced Socioeconomic and Border Crossing Data 2005–2030
Developed Binational Evaluation Criteria for POEs and Transportation Projects
Ranked POE and Transportation Projects
Developed Recommendations
Adopted and Customized by other Border States
7
7
2014 BMP: Key Accomplishments
Updated Socioeconomic and Border Crossing Data 2010–2040
Developed a Web-based Data Entry/Retrieval System for Projects
Identified New POE and Transportation Project Categories; Ranked Projects
Conducted Borderwide Binational Peer Exchange and Identified Potential Funding Opportunities and Sources for the BMP
Developed a Transportation Modeling Framework for POE Sensitivity Analysis
Developed New Recommendations
8
8
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 4 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 Area of Influence and Focused Study Area
9
9
2021 BMP: Proposed Goals
1. Maintain and strengthen binational coordination via the U.S.–Mexico Joint Working Committee and the Binational Bridges and Border Crossing Group 2. Expand outreach to community groups and private sector stakeholders in the border region 3. Review status of recommendations from previous BMPs 4. Develop a process to manage the border as one system consisting of coordinated POEs in the California– Baja California Border Region, considering current innovative efforts of stakeholders
10
10
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 5 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 2021 BMP: Proposed Goals
5. Identify and address regional mobility impacts of cross border traffic on border communities 6. Update new policy and/or legislative issues and funding trends and opportunities for • planning and capital improvement projects • sustainable ongoing BMP process 7. Encourage on-going communication amongst participating agencies by upgrading the existing web- based project data management tool to an updatable data source for partner agency information sharing
11
11
Task 1 & 2: Outreach to PAC/TWG to develop and approve final Scope of Work
Scope of Task 3: Develop public and stakeholder Work outreach and communication plan Task 4: Gather, review, and update existing BMP data
Task 5: Conduct assessment of existing conditions of multimodal transportation system
Task 6: Website and enhance web-based data management tool, update project lists, and rank POE projects
12 12
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 6 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 Task 7:Identify innovative border improvement strategies
Scope of Task 8:Develop GIS story map Work Task 9:Update information on funding issues and opportunities
Task 10: Develop concepts and scope of work for separate studies and efforts
Task 11: Develop recommendations
Task 12: Draft and Final Reports
Plus: Incorporate planning efforts by other agencies as appropriate within existing budget 13 13
Proposed Project Schedule
This frame is specially sized to show full‐page maps and images from the BMP. In order to display full‐page graphics from the BMP: 1) Convert a page of the BMP to a JPG using smallpdf.com/pdf‐to‐jpg 2) Click icon below and select the JPG
14
14
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 7 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 Status
• Kick-off meeting – January 21, 2020
• TWG meeting – February 27, 2020
• TWG meeting – May 26, 2020
• PAC meeting – June 30, 2020
• Stakeholder engagement – begins June 2020 • COBRO • Imperial-Mexicali Binational Alliance (IMBA) • San Diego Border Coalition
15
15
Contacts
Jose Márquez Arq. Carlos López Rodríguez Chief, International Border Relations Director de Reordenación Territorial and Freight Mobility Branch
Caltrans SIDURT (619) 688-3610 (686) 558-1062 [email protected] [email protected]
16
16
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 8 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020 CALIFORNIA – BAJA CALIFORNIA 2021 BORDER MASTER PLAN
BORDERS COMMITTEE JOINT SESSION
JOSE MARQUEZ, CALTRANS JUNE 26, 2020
17
Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities 9 Agenda Item No. 6 | June 26, 2020