Gingival Recession Associated with Predisposing Factors in Young Vietnamese: a Pilot Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Gingival Recession Associated With Predisposing Factors in Young Vietnamese: A Pilot Study Tung Nguyen-Hieu1, Bao-Dan Ha-Thi2, Hang Do-Thu2, Hoa Tran-Giao3 1PhD, DDS.* † 2MSc, DDS.* 3DDS.* *Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. †Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, UM 63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, INSERM 1095, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. Abstract Aims: Several studies have shown a large diversity in the prevalence, extent and severity of gingival recession as well as controversial conclusions of its associated factors. Therefore, the aim of this pilot study was to evaluate gingival reces- sion with predisposing factors in young Vietnamese. Methods: A cross-sectional study using clinical examination was performed in 120 dental students. Oral hygiene status, tooth malposition and fraenal attachment were recorded. The width of keratinised gingiva was measured after mucosa staining with Lugol’s iodine solution. Measurements of gingival recession were performed on labial tooth surfaces. Chi- square test, t-test and Pearson’s correlation were used for data analysis. Results: The prevalence of gingival recession was 72.5% of the studied population. The extent of affected teeth was 11.1% of the examined teeth. The proportion of root-surface exposure was statistically higher (P<0.05) in the maxilla (12.5%) than in the mandible (9.6%). Premolars and right canines were the teeth most frequently and most seriously associated with gingival recession, respectively. There was a strong negative correlation between narrow width of kera- tinised gingiva and gingival recession (P<0.001). The recession was statistically associated with tooth malposition (P<0.001) but it was not related to high fraenal attachment and gender. Conclusions: A high prevalence of gingival recession was found in Vietnamese dental students. Gingival recession was associated with narrow width of keratinised gingiva, tooth malposition and maxillary teeth. Further studies performed in larger populations with more extended age groups are needed to confirm these findings. Key Words: Gingival Recession, Prevalence, Severity, Extent, Tooth Malposition, Fraenal Attachment, Keratinised Gingiva Introduction tooth-brushing, non-carious cervical lesions (abra- Gingival recession has been defined as a displace- sion, abfraction, erosion, resorption), inflammation ment of gingival margin apically from the cemen- (dental plaque, calculus, gingivitis, periodontitis), to-enamel junction (CEJ), leading to root-surface iatrogenic factors (inappropriate fixed prostheses, exposure, which may cause poor aesthetics, dentine poorly designed partial dentures, operative proce- hypersensitivity, plaque retention, gingival bleed- dures, orthodontic treatment, traumatic occlusion) ing, susceptibility for root caries and fear of tooth and diverse factors (age, gender, piercing, chewing loss [1-3]. A denuded root surface frequently stick trauma) [3,4]. A high prevalence of gingival results from a combination of predisposing and recession has been reported in America (63%-89%) triggering/aggravating factors. Predisposing factors [5-7], Europe (25%-84%) [8-13] and Australia included bone dehiscence, insufficiency of width (71%) [14] but a lower prevalence has been found and/or thickness of keratinised gingiva, tooth mal- in Africa (28%) [15,16] and Asia (15%) [17]. position and high fraenal attachment. The trigger- However, the extent of root-surface exposure was ing/aggravating factors may include: traumatic higher in Africa (18%-51%) [15,16] and America Corresponding author: Tung Nguyen-Hieu, Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 27 boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France; e-mail : [email protected] 134 OHDM - Vol. 11 - No. 3 - September, 2012 (38%-44%) [5-7] than in Europe (5%-17%) [8-13], They obtained a kappa index of agreement of more Australia (4.6%) [14] and Asia (2%) [17]. There than 0.8. Oral hygiene status was evaluated by are limited published data concerning the preva- Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) [21]. lence, extent, and severity, as well as associated Labial surfaces of upper first molars and lingual factors of gingival recession in Asia [16,18]. surfaces of lower first molars (sometimes second Furthermore, conclusions of the association molars because of first molar loss) and the labial between gingival recession and predisposing fac- surfaces of upper right and lower left central inci- tors including width of keratinised gingiva [12], sors were assessed for debris and calculus accumu- fraenum attachment [13,18] and tooth malposition lations. The OHI-S has two components including [15,18,19] are still controversial [20]. Although the the Simplified Debris Index (DI-S) and the aetiology of root-surface exposure is multifactorial, Simplified Calculus Index (CI-S), which are based determining the influence of predisposing factors on numerical determinations representing the has an important role in management of gingival amount of debris and calculus found on the select- recession such as increasing keratinised tissue, ed tooth surfaces. Each of these indices has scores fraenectomy or orthodontic treatment. from 0-3 corresponding with an absence of soft debris/calculus, their amount covering one-third, Aim two-thirds, and more than two-thirds of the exam- The aim of this pilot study was to measure gingival ined tooth surface, respectively. recession in a population of 19-25 year-old dental All excluded sites including absent teeth, tooth students for preliminary assessment of the preva- roots and tooth-supported fixed prostheses (crowns lence, extent, severity of gingival recession and its and bridges) were noted. Tooth malpositions predisposing factors including width of keratinised including overeruption, rotation and other gingiva, tooth malposition and fraenal attachment malalignment were also recorded. The position of in Vietnamese young adults. the CEJ was determined by visual observation and the "slight scratch" of a periodontal probe on the Methods cervical tooth area in a cervico-occlusal direction. If there were non-carious cervical (wear) lesions or Target population cervical restorations, the position of the CEJ was A cross-sectional study using a clinical examina- considered as corresponding with that of adjacent tion was performed in a population of 120 dental teeth. Gingival recession was evaluated by using a students of University of Medicine and Pharmacy millimetre-graduated periodontal probe to measure of Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. These subjects from the free gingival margin to the CEJ at the site were randomly selected from about 600 students of of maximum gingival recession on the labial sur- Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology. Briefly, 80-120 face of each tooth (excluding third molars). In order dental students from every class were classified to localise the mucogingival junction (MGJ), both into ten groups of 8-12 students, from which two the gingiva and buccal mucosa were rinsed with groups were randomly selected. A total of 12 water, dried and then stained with 3% Lugol's groups including 120 students from six classes iodine solution (3 g of elemental iodine and 6 g agreed to participate in this study after reading the potassium iodine in 300 mL sterile water) by using research objectives and signing a consent form. a cotton swab. After two minutes, highly kera- Only 19-25 year-old students, non-smoking and tinised epithelium did not retain the Lugol's iodine those having more than 24 teeth (excluding third solution while buccal mucosa was stained a red- molars) were included. Students with a history of brown colour. The width of keratinised gingiva of orthodontic or periodontal treatment were exclud- each tooth (excluding third molars and previously ed. The type of toothbrush (soft, medium or hard) excluded sites) was measured by using a millime- used by the students was recorded. tre-graduated periodontal probe from MGJ to free gingival margin with 1.0 mm precision. Fraenal Clinical examination and measurements attachments were also assessed according to the All clinical examinations were performed by two Placek et al. (1974) classification [22] in which periodontists (B-D H-T and H D-T) who had previ- four levels of labial fraenal attachments are mucos- ously calibrated by recording all clinical measure- al, gingival, papillary and papillary penetrating. ments to be used in the study on ten dental students. After clinical examination, participants were given 135 OHDM - Vol. 11 - No. 3 - September, 2012 oral hygiene instruction and advice on how to con- gival recession. The proportion of root denudation trol the progression of gingival recession as well as was statistically higher (chi-square test, P<0.05) in suggestions for appropriate treatment. the maxilla (205/1634, 12.5%) than in the mandible (157/1635, 9.6%). Furthermore, teeth most fre- quently associated with gingival recession were the Data analysis left first molar (35/116, 30.2%) and the right first For assessing the oral hygiene status, OHI-S value premolar (31/114, 27.2%) in the maxilla and the was calculated and classified from 0-1.2 for good right second premolar (24/113, 21.2%) and left first status, 1.3-3.0 for medium status and 3.1-6.0 for premolar (25/119, 21%) in the mandible (Figure 1). poor status. Values of DI-S and CI-S were com- In the maxilla, a decreasing degree of root-surface bined to obtain OHI-S value as follows: DI-S = exposure was observed as follows: premolars (total scores of debris)/(total number of tooth sur- (84/205, 41%) > molars (74/205, 36.1%) > canines faces with debris), CI-S = (total scores of calcu- (34/205, 16.6%) > incisors (13/205, 6.3%). In the lus)/(total number of tooth surfaces with calculus) mandible, this was found as follow: premolars and OHI-S = (DI-S + CI-S) [21]. Descriptive statis- (90/157, 57.3%) > molars (37/157, 23.6%) > inci- tics and the chi-square test were carried out to char- sors (18/157, 11.5%) > canines (12/157, 7.6%).