October 2, 2020 Heide Antonescu Trumark Homes LLC 3001 Bishop

October 2, 2020

Heide Antonescu Trumark Homes LLC 3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100 East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Subject: Revised Arborist Evaluation, Kassis Property, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, California (PN 2332-01)

Dear Ms. Antonescu:

Per your request, Live Oak Associates (LOA) has revised the arborist evaluation that was prepared on April 24, 2019 in support of the City of Rancho Cordova’s requirements for the development of a proposed subdivision on approximately 41 acres. The site is zoned residential, and formerly contained two residences, both of which were removed from the site in the late seventies. In the meantime, the site has been occupied by a mature walnut orchard.

The project area is located north of Folsom Boulevard, west of Rod Beaudry Drive and east of the American River in Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, California. The report is intended to identify all trees within and immediately adjacent to the site that could be affected by the proposed project. The report is to be used by the City of Rancho Cordova, their agents, and the property owners as a reference for existing tree conditions to help satisfy planning requirements.

The Zoning of the property is FB-RMU (Folsom Blvd, Residential Mixed Use) (Medium Density Residential). There were previously two structures on the property between 1937 and 1979. Based on the City ordinance, tree species (other than oaks) that are 24 inches in diameter or greater are considered protected trees on residential sites. The lower threshold for protected oaks is 6 inches in diameter. Careful tree measurements consistent with the City’s tree ordinance revealed that of the 289 on-site trees greater than 12 inches diameter (or 6 inches for oaks), there are 147 trees on the site that meet the threshold to be protected by the ordinance for residential sites. An additional 45 perimeter trees were identified, but not measured since access to these trees generally was not possible. Based on review of the preliminary engineering drawings, 138 protected trees cannot be avoided and will need to be removed to accommodate the proposed development. BACKGROUND

This arborist evaluation was prepared in compliance with the City of Rancho Cordova, Preservation and Protection of Private Trees (accessed October 22, 2018 from online: (https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/RanchoCordova/html/RanchoCordova19/RanchoCordova 1912.html#19.12.120) (Attachment 1). The ordinance requires that the arborist evaluation is prepared by an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.

The City defines a Protected Tree as a tree meeting the following criteria:

“Protected tree" means:

1. Native oak - Quercus lobata, valley oak; Quercus wislizenii, interior live oak; Quercus douglasii, blue oak; or Quercus morehus, oracle oak - having a trunk diameter of at least six inches or greater; or

2. Any tree species other than a native oak having a trunk diameter of at least 12 inches or greater on nonresidential property; or

3. Any tree species other than a native oak having a trunk diameter of at least 24 inches or greater on residential property; or

4. Any tree planted as a requirement tree for site development, tree permit condition, landscape plan removal replacement, or other designated condition by the public works director or planning director.

Furthermore,

"Diameter at standard height" or "DSH" means the diameter of a tree measured at four and one- half feet above natural grade, except as specified below. The diameter shall be calculated by using the following formula: diameter equals circumference/3.14.

1. For a tree that branches at or below four and one-half feet, DSH means the diameter at the narrowest point between the grade and the branching point.

2. For a tree with a common root system that branches at the ground, DSH means the sum of the diameter of the largest trunk and one-half the cumulative diameter of the remaining trunks at four and one-half feet above natural grade.

Protected trees are to be retained where possible, and where removal is necessary, mitigation, typically consisting of replacement trees, is required. Non-protected trees don’t require

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 2 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation replacement and are not the subject of this report. Therefore, trees not meeting the definition of protected trees are not discussed further.

Tree protection measures have been provided as well in this arborist evaluation. The factors most important to determining how trees respond to disturbance near the roots include species, tree age, tree condition, tree lean, soil type and site drainage. Mature trees are generally more sensitive than young trees. Approximately 90-95 percent of a tree’s root system is in the top three feet of soil, and more than half is in the top one foot of soil. A tree’s root system extends well beyond the tree’s dripline, often extending a distance equaling two to three times the tree’s height. Soil compaction is by far the most common way that construction damage harms and kills trees. Tree roots need crumbly, well-aerated soil to grow and to obtain oxygen, water and nutrients. Without good soil aeration, roots suffocate and the tree health eventually declines. Symptoms of stress caused by tree root stress may occur within weeks of the damage, but are more likely to take 5 to 10 years to fully develop. A stressed tree is more susceptible to further stress, or even mortality, from drought and/or insects and diseases.

METHODS

The arborist survey was completed on January 12, 13, February 2, and 3, 2019 by Ms. Wendy Fisher, an arborist certified by the ISA (Certified Arborist #WE-3872A; exp. 12-31-21) with the assistance of Mr. Todd Ellsworth (staff ecologist). A follow-up field visit was completed on May 13, 2019 by Ms. Fisher. Prior to the field visits, a review of the City’s Ordinance provided guidance on creating the field data sheet that includes all the information pertinent to this ordinance. All on-site trees were tagged using aluminum tree tags at breast height.

The surveyors located, identified, measured DSH, estimated height and canopy diameter, and provided a condition rating (which assessed the health and condition) of all trees located on the 41 acres. Most on-site trees contained multiple trunks branched above ground level. Measurements outlined in the City tree ordinance were carefully adhered to. A tree’s condition percentage is a determination of its overall health and structure based on five aspects: roots, trunk, scaffold branches, twigs, and foliage.

The following scale defines the condition ratings and percentages:

0 • 100% = Exceptional = Good health and structure with significant size, location or quality. 1 • 75% = Good = No apparent problems, good structure and health. 2 • 50% = Fair = Minor problems, at least one structural defect or health concern, problems can be mitigated through cultural practices such as pruning or a plant health care program. 3 • 25% = Poor = Major problems with multiple structural defects or declining health, not a good candidate for retention. 4 • 0% = Dead/Unstable = Extreme problems, irreversible decline, failing structure, or dead.

Trees with canopies that overlap the boundaries of the site were also accounted for, and were documented on western, northern and eastern boundaries of the site. During the January and

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 3 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation February field visits, nuts and bark characteristics were used to differentiate between the pecan and the two Juglans sp. Foliage was in a state of decomposition on the ground, beyond the point of clear description. Leaf characteristics were observed during the May visit to verify the species identification.

SURVEY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Tree data collected in the field can be found in Attachment 2. The numbered locations on the map corresponded with the tree tags and the numbers in the right-hand column on each field data sheet. Representative photographs of protected trees on the site can be found in Attachment 3. Tree locations (which correspond to the tree tags) showing those to be removed have been mapped in Attachment 4. Trees to be protected are shown in Attachment 5. As shown in Table 1 and in Attachment 2, 147 protected trees occur within the (mostly) fenced boundaries of the site, based on the criteria outlined in the City’s tree ordinance for residential sites.

Table 1. Protected Trees identified on the Kassis Property, a residential site, during the January/February Arborist Surveys, 2019. Latin Name Common Name CA Native Species Number of Trees Carya illinoinensis (formerly Carya pecan) Pecan No 5 Ficus carica Common Fig No 3 Fraxinus velutina Velvet Ash No 3 Juglans cinerea White Walnut No 3 Juglans regia x hindsii Cultivated Walnut No 121 Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak Yes 15 Total 1 147

The vast majority of the trees found on site are a hybrid between California black walnut (Juglans hindsii) and English walnut (Juglans regia). Scions of English walnut are often grafted with rootstock of our native species to make them more adaptable to soil and climate conditions, and resistant to insects and diseases. Depending on tree maintenance and pruning regimen, grafted trees will take on various characteristics of the two sets of genes. Field observations in May 2019 revealed that the nuts and leaves of most of these trees resembled California black walnut. A few trees had leaves that more closely resembled English walnut. Some trees had leaves of English walnut in the canopy and sprouts at the tree base of California black walnut. The majority of trees on the upper terrace were found to be almonds (Prunus dulcis).Most trees were planted in rows, and in very good health with a condition rating of 90-100%. No trees were found to be more than 50% dead.

The site occurs near one of the historic indigenous groves of Northern California black walnut in the Sacramento region, one of the five isolated regions known to historically contain natural groves. Juglans hindsii is the only species of walnut that grew in Northern California when the pioneers arrived with other orchard varieties in 1840. Since then, many English walnuts were grafted with our native species to ensure success, and take on various positive characteristics of

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 4 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation the two sets of genes. Pure indigenous groves of Juglans hindsii are now extremely rare, which is why it is listed as State Endangered and California Native Plant Society 1B (rare throughout the range and has declined significantly of the last century). Sometimes, only DNA testing can demonstrate which walnut trees are hybridized or which are genetically pure. No DNA testing has been completed for the walnut trees on the site. Clearly, all on-site walnut trees showed evidence of grafting and are considered hybrids between the indigenous species and the English species.

Fifteen (15) oaks on the site met the size criteria for protection (minimum 6” DSH), and all were interior live oak (Quercus wizlizenii). Of these, five (5) will be retained and ten (10) will need to be removed for project implementation. Additionally, twelve (12) oaks (two valley oaks (Quercus lobata) and ten (10) interior live oaks) occurring along the site boundaries will be protected from project impacts.

Furthermore, 45 trees had trunks that were growing on the other side of fenced boundaries, but had canopies that overlapped the site. A variety of ornamental species occur in landscaped backyards of adjacent lands, including but not limited to, Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum), Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara), Italian stone pine (Pinus thumbergii), coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), and Velvet ash. Since the backyards of existing residences were inaccessible, estimates of tree diameters were performed. Along the eastern boundary, visual inspection was limited to what could be seen of each tree through or above the fences. Some of adjacent trees growing along the northern and western boundaries were able to be measured, as the on the ground fencing did not always correspond with actual site boundaries.

TREE PROTECTION MEASURES

Thirty-five perimeter trees documented during the site surveys will be protected; protection measures outlined below should provide adequate protection of these trees. The preliminary tree protection plan included as Attachment 5 identifies which trees will be protected.

The following tree protection measures are recommended for all trees to be retained:

1) Only dead, weakened, diseased or dangerous branches should be removed. Necessary pruning should be done during the winter dormant period. Avoid aesthetic pruning immediately before, during or after construction impact. Perform only that pruning which is unavoidable to conflicts with the proposed development.

2) A tree protection zone (TPZ) will be established around each preserved tree, within which certain activities are prohibited (filling, excavating, trenching, compaction, etc.), to minimize potential injury to the trees. An acceptable TPZ is the edge of the canopy or 5 feet from the trunks, per Section 19.12.150 of the City ordinance (see Attachment 1). This buffer should be retained wherever possible. Construction fencing will be installed

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 5 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation to clearly identify the TPZ. Off-limits signs should be posted on the fences that state that no equipment is to enter the TPZ. No signs will be attached to the trunk of any trees. Once established, the fences must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. The TPZ will be shown on all plans, including the storm water, utility, and landscape plans.

3) Engineer site improvements so that water runoff will not slope toward the trunks. Keep the elevation of the soil surface at the existing level within the protected area around the trunk. Do not stockpile any construction material within the root zone, even temporarily.

4) Soak the ground beneath the canopy of each tree prior to, during, and right after construction. This deep-watering method consists of a slow, all-day soaking within the root zone. Mulching around the base of each tree using bark will help to retain the soil moisture and aerate the roots.

5) Trees that have recently undergone severe pruning or root damage should not be fertilized for six months following disturbance. Fertilize and/or mulch each tree in late winter or early fall prior to any construction activities, using no more than six pounds of nitrogen per 1,000 square feet of dripline.

6) If possible, schedule work within the vicinity of the trees for fall or winter, when the trees are using more energy resources for root growth and vitality.

7) Do not excavate any ditch, tunnel or trench, or place fill within the dripline of a protected tree. Should any roots need to be severed during construction, cover any exposed or cut roots with soil or mulch as soon as possible until the native soil can be backfilled. If possible, use sharp tools (chainsaw or axe) for pruning roots. Using hand tools will help to heal the wounded roots more quickly than pruning with bulldozers, and will better avoid tearing of the roots behind the cuts.

8) Prevent chemical spill damage within the root zones during construction by avoiding filling of gas tanks, repairing equipment, cleaning paint brushes, rinsing of cement trucks, or burning debris within the general proximity of the trees. Do not allow any chemical, gas, smoke, salt brine, oil, pesticide, or other injurious substance to seep, drain, or be emptied upon, above, or below any protected tree.

9) Do not secure, fasten, or run any rope, wire, sign unprotected electrical installation or other device or material to around, or through a protected tree.

10) Do not break, injure, deface, kill or destroy a protected tree or allow any fire to burn where it will injure any protected tree. Do not erect, alter, repair or raze any building or

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 6 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation structure without placing suitable guards around all nearby protected trees which may be injured by such operations.

11) Do not top any protected trees.

12) Consistent with Section 19.12.160 of the City municipal code (see Attachment 1), Any development or building permit that encroaches upon the existing dripline of a protected tree shall require a tree protection plan submitted with the project application. The tree protection plan shall be included on all demolition, grading, construction, and landscaping plants and project specifications. All protected trees and protective fencing or other protection features shall be shown on all project demotion, grading, construction, and landscape plans.

Implementation of tree protection recommendations as described above is anticipated to result in the highest survival of the trees to be retained.

In September of 2020, as a response to public comments, LOA has provided additional analysis of TPZ’s for riparian trees located along the river bluff. Construction tolerance ratings and methods of calculating the optimal TPP have been excerpted from “Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development” (Metheny and Clark, 1998). Table 2 presents optimal and anticipated protection zones and for individual riparian trees.

Table 2. Optimal TPZ for Individual Riparian Trees along the American River Bluff.

Tree Tree Age Estimated Number Construction (young, TPZ (see (from north Latin Common Tolerance mature, Optimal T Attachment to south) Name Name Diameter Rating overmature) PZ 4) Quercus Interior 320 wizlisenii live oak 36.4 Moderate Mature 36 46 Quercus Interior 319 wizlisenii live oak 21.9 Moderate Mature 22 49 Juglans regia x Cultivated 116 hindsii walnut 2.5 Poor Young 2.5 23 Quercus Interior 317 wizlisenii live oak 19 Moderate Mature 19 49 Quercus 318 lobata Valley oak 22 Moderate Mature 22 22 Juglans regia x English 110 hindsii walnut 25.6 Poor Mature 32 13 Quercus Interior 314 wizlisenii live oak Est 28 Moderate Mature 28 59

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 7 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation Table 2. Optimal TPZ for Individual Riparian Trees along the American River Bluff (cont’d).

Tree Tree Age Estimated Number Construction (young, TPZ (see (from north Latin Common Tolerance mature, Optimal T Attachment to south) Name Name Diameter Rating overmature) PZ 4) Quercus Interior 94 wizlisenii live oak 19.7 Moderate Mature 20 30 Quercus Interior 313 wizlisenii live oak 12 Moderate Young 20 31 Juglans regia x Cultivated 312 hindsii walnut 18 Poor Mature 22.5 36 Quercus Interior 310 wizlisenii live oak 8 Moderate Young 6 37 Quercus Interior 311 wizlisenii live oak Est 18 Moderate Mature 18 26 Quercus Interior 309 wizlisenii live oak 12 Moderate Young 9 25 Juglans English 308 regia walnut 60 Poor Mature 75 22

As shown in Table 2, all trees except for two will be provided optimal TPZ’s. The two trees whose TPZ’s fall short of the optimal TPZ are cultivated walnuts (non-native orchard trees). Although the TPZ’s for these two trees are not optimal, it is the arborist professional opinion that construction of the split rail fencing and trail will be far enough away from the trunk (13 feet for Tree 110 and 22 feet for Tree 308) to not have significant negative impacts to these two trees. It is anticipated that all protected trees bordering the river will not be harmed by the proposed trail and split rail fence planned nearby.

TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT

At the time that this report was being prepared, it was understood that the vast majority of trees on the site would need to be removed to accommodate the proposed project. Of the 289 on-site trees greater than 12 inches diameter (or 6 inches for oaks)(see Attachment 2), there are 147 trees on the site that meet the threshold to be protected by the ordinance for residential sites.

One hundred and thirty-eight protected trees (138) 24 inches or greater in diameter from six difference tree species were identified within the footprint of development (Table 3 and Attachment 4).

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 8 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation Table 3. Protected Trees to be Removed on the Kassis Property.

Latin Name Common Name CA Native Species Number of Trees Carya illinoinensis (formerly Carya pecan) Pecan No 5 Ficus carica Common Fig No 3 Fraxinus velutina Velvet Ash No 3 Juglans cinerea White Walnut No 1 Juglans regia x hindsii Cultivated Walnut No 118 Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak Yes 8 Total 1 138

Given the anticipated level of impact to the on-site and adjacent trees, 138 trees (mostly orchard trees, planted in rows) will need to be compensated for. Since there will be limited space on-site for tree planting, a combination of on-site planting and contribution towards the in-lieu fund held by the Sacramento Tree Foundation (https://www.sactree.com/openspaces) or another acceptable in-lieu fund is proposed, the amounts for each to be determined. As specified in Section B.1 of Chapter 19.12.120.B.1, replacement typically calls for one tree to be planted for each protected tree removed on residential lands. Since the vast majority of trees being removed are non-native horticultural orchard trees, a replacement ratio of 0.25:1 is proposed.

The basis for this arborist evaluation is limited to the visual examination of accessible parts during the January/February/May 2019 tree surveys, without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees in question may not arise in the future.

Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss this updated arborist evaluation.

Sincerely,

Wendy Fisher Senior Project Manager Certified Arborist #WE-3872A (exp. 12-31-21)

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 9 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation Attachment 1 City of Rancho Cordova Preservation and Protection of Private Trees Chapter 19.12

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 10 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation

Attachment 2 Arborist Data, Kassis Property, Rancho Cordova Collected by Certified Arborist Wendy Fisher in January and February 2019

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 24 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation 1

TreeData.KassisPropertyArboristEvaluation.January2019.ProtectedTreesareaminimumof12"diameter. Diameter Canopy Measured Diameter Estimated Condition Suitabilityfor Anticipated Tree#Tag# Species at4.5feet (ft) Height(ft) Rating* GeneralHealth Preservation LevelofImpact

11Juglansregia 58 50 60 1 Good Good Removal

22Juglansregia 23.3 25 22 2 Fair,leaning Fair Removal

33Juglansregia 17.5 15 20 3(Poor) Onemajortrunkbroken Poor Removal

44Juglansregia 22.3 20 25 2 Mechanicaldamageontrunk Fair Removal

55Juglansregia 28.6 22 25 1 Good Good Removal

66Juglansregia 17.8 18 18 1 Good Good Removal

77Juglansregia 37 28 25 1 Good Good Removal

88Juglansregia 24.9 20 22 1 Good Good Removal

99Juglansregia 12.9 22 20 1 Good Good Removal

10 10 Juglansregia 19.7 20 25 1 Good Good Removal

11 11 Juglansregia 14.8 22 25 2 Sparsecanopy Fair Removal

12 12 Juglansregia 22.7 20 25 1 Good Good Removal

13 13 Juglansregia 24.6 20 28 1 Good Good Removal

14 14 Juglansregia 28 30 25 1 Good Good Removal

15 15 Juglansregia 23.8 25 28 1 Good Good Removal 2

16 16 Juglansregia 28.3 25 25 2 Somedeadstems Good Removal

17 17 Juglansregia 33.6 22 25 1 Good Good Removal

18 18 Juglansregia 30.8 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

19 19 Juglansregia 20.2 18 20 3 Leaning,mechanicalinjury Poor Removal

20 20 Juglansregia 28.2 18 18 1 Good Good Removal

21 21 Juglansregia 30.9 26 22 1 Good Good Removal

22 22 Pinus sp. 23.9 35 75 2 Pitchintrunk Fair Removal

23 23 Quercuswizlizenii 18.5 25 30 2 GoodͲinoleander Good Removal

24 24 Quercuswizlizenii 7.1 15 40 1 Good Good Retained

25 25 Quercuswizlizenii 13 15 45 1 Good Good Retained

26 26 Quercuswizlizenii 12.4 15 45 1 Good Good Retained

27 27 Quercuswizlizenii 14.4 20 45 2 Leaning,sideheavy Good Removal

28 28 Quercuswizlizenii 12.2 25 45 1 Good Good Retained

29 29 Quercuswizlizenii 10.5 25 50 1 Straight,good Good Removal

30 30 Quercuswizlizenii 10.9 20 25 2 Leaning Fair Removal

31 31 Quercuswizlizenii 23.2 20 45 4 Poor,brokentrunk,sideheavy Poor Removal

32 32 Juglansregia 27.7 18 15 1 Good Good Removal 3

33 33 Juglansregia 27 18 15 1 Good Good Removal

34 34 Juglansregia 16.8 15 20 2 Mechanicalwound Fair Removal

35 35 Juglansregia 24.6 15 18 2 Mechanicalwound Good Removal

36 36 Caryapecan 31.7 45 60 1 Good,boundarytree Good Removal

37 37 Ficuscarica 35.2 20 20 1 Good Good Removal

38 38 Ficuscarica 22.7 18 18 1 Good Good Removal

39 39 Ficuscarica 26 20 15 1 Good Good Removal

40 40 Caryapecan 39 45 45 2 Mistletoe,fair,mechanicaldamage Fair Removal

41 41 Juglansregia 18.5 40 30 2 Brokenstem,mechanicalwound Fair Removal

42 42 Juglansregia 29.6 25 25 1 Good Fair Removal

43 43 Juglansregia 25.5 15 20 1 Good Fair Removal

44 44 Juglansregia 24.5 15 25 1 Good Fair Removal

45 45 Juglansregia 37.7 18 25 1 Good Fair Removal

46 46 Quercuswizlizenii 32.6 50 60 1 Good,sapsuckers Good Removal

47 47 Juglansregia 31.1 40 50 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

48 48 Juglansregia 46 45 60 1 Good Good Removal

49 49 Juglansregia 25.8 35 80 2 Leaning Fair Removal

50 50 Juglansregia 50.5 30 60 2 Mechanicalinjury Fair Removal 4

51 51 Juglansregia 51.7 25 40 3 Trunkcavity Poor Removal

52 52 Juglansregia 11.5 20 30 4 2deadtrunks Verypoor Removal

53 53 Juglansregia 25.4 25 50 3 Trunkcavity,leans Poor Removal

54 54 Juglansregia 12.3 20 35 4 Verypoor,70%dead Verypoor Removal

55 55 Juglansregia 28.7 40 50 2 Rottentrunk Fair Removal

56 56 Juglansregia 15.7 25 40 4 Rottenbase,oldtrunk Verypoor Removal

57 57 Juglansregia 24 40 50 1 Good Good Removal

58 58 Juglansregia 13.1 20 40 2 Trunkinjury Fair Removal

59 59 Juglansregia 12.9 25 45 1 Good Good Removal

60 60 Juglansregia 17.2 15 20 1 Good Good Removal

61 61 Caryapecan 26.1 40 50 1 Good Good Removal

62 62 Caryapecan 13.2 15 45 1 Good Good Removal

63 63 Caryapecan 15.5 25 45 2 Leans Good Removal

64 64 Caryapecan 17.1 25 40 1 Good Good Removal

65 65 Caryapecan 20.2 30 30 2 Leans Fair Removal

66 66 Caryapecan 23.8 25 45 1 Good Good Removal

67 67 Caryapecan 15 20 30 2 Leans Fair Removal

68 68 Caryapecan 21.1 20 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

69 69 Caryapecan 15.5 30 45 2 Leans Fair Removal 5

70 70 Fraxinusvelutina 22.7 45 65 1 Good Good Removal

71 71 Fraxinusvelutina 33.4 40 70 1 Good Good Removal

72 72 Juglanscinerea 45 40 50 1 Good Good Removal

73 73 Caryapecan 13.3 40 60 1 Good Good Removal

74 74 Caryapecan 16.3 20 70 1 Good Good Removal

75 75 Juglansregia 15.3 20 70 2 Leaning Fair Removal

76 76 Juglansregia 26.2 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

77 77 Juglansregia 48 70 70 1 Good Good Removal

78 78 Fraxinusvelutina 26.1 25 45 1 Good Good Removal

79 79 Caryapecan 17.3 35 70 1 Good Good Removal

80 80 Juglanscinerea 19.1 20 15 4 Brokentop Verypoor Removal

81 81 Juglansregia 29.4 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

82 82 Juglansregia 18.4 30 40 2 Leanstonorth Good Removal

83 83 Juglansregia 19.4 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

84 84 Juglansregia 24.9 30 35 2 Mechanicalinjury Fair Removal

85 85 Juglansregia 23.8 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

86 86 Juglansregia 22.9 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

87 87 Juglansregia 19.7 45 40 2 Onemajortrunkcut Fair Removal

88 88 Juglansregia 23.4 40 40 1 Good Good Removal 6

89 89 Quercuswizlizenii 26.6 45 40 1 Good Good Removal

90 90 Quercuswizlizenii 37.4 30 40 1 Good Good Removal

91 91 Juglansregia 19.7 25 20 1 Good Good Removal

92 92 Juglansregia 19 35 40 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

93 93 Juglansregia 37.8 30 25 1 Good Good Removal

94 94 Quercuschrysolepis 61.6 55 40 1 Good,massiveoak Good Retained

95 95 Juglansregia 19.1 50 35 1 Good,1stemlvs Good Removal

96 96 Juglansregia 18.8 35 40 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

97 97 Juglansregia 21.6 35 25 3 Cuttrunkandbasalcavity Fair Removal

98 98 Juglansregia 45.7 40 45 1 Verylarge Good Removal

99 99 Juglansregia 37.1 35 35 2 Mechanicalinjury Fair Removal

100 100 Juglansregia 31 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

101 101 Juglansregia 27.4 25 30 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

102 102 Juglansregia 37.5 45 45 1 Good Good Removal

103 103 Juglansregia 21.7 35 45 1 Good Good Removal

104 104 Juglansregia 20.1 40 40 2 Onebrokentrunk Good Removal

105 105 Juglansregia 32.5 40 35 1 Good Good Removal

106 106 Juglansregia 34 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

107 107 Juglansregia 28.6 30 30 1 Good Good Removal 7

108 108 Juglansregia 30.1 25 40 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

109 109 Juglansregia 43.7 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

110 110 Juglansregia 25.6 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

111 111 Juglansregia 23.2 20 25 1 Good Good Removal

112 112 Juglansregia 27.5 35 35 1 Good Good Removal

113 113 Juglansregia 23.3 35 30 1 Good Good Removal

114 114 Juglansregia 31.9 40 30 2 Basalcavity Good Removal

115 115 Juglansregia 28.8 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

116 116 Juglansregia 25 35 40 1 Good Good Removal

117 117 Juglansregia 21.9 20 20 1 Good Good Removal

118 118 Juglansregia 31.4 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

119 119 Juglansregia 23.5 30 25 1 Good Good Removal

120 120 Juglansregia 21.5 20 40 1 Good Good Removal

121 121 Juglansregia 28.4 35 40 1 Good Good Retained

122 122 Juglansregia 31.1 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

123 123 Juglansregia 29.4 20 30 1 Good Good Removal

124 124 Juglansregia 35.1 24 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

125 125 Juglansregia 43.6 35 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

126 126 Juglansregia 25.5 22 28 3 Basalcavity Poor Removal 8

127 127 Juglansregia 19 18 35 1 Good Good Removal

128 128 Juglansregia 19.1 20 35 1 Good Good Removal

129 129 Juglansregia 20 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

130 130 Juglansregia 43.8 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

131 131 Juglansregia 27.4 25 25 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

132 132 Juglansregia 27 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

133 133 Juglansregia 21.7 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

134 134 Juglansregia 31.4 30 40 1 Good Good Removal

135 135 Juglansregia 35 35 45 1 Good Good Removal

136 136 Juglansregia 16.5 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

137 137 Juglansregia 20.8 30 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

138 138 Juglansregia 18.9 30 28 1 Good Good Removal

139 139 Juglansregia 20.8 20 25 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

140 140 Juglansregia 16.4 25 35 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

141 141 Juglansregia 21.2 30 35 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

142 142 Juglansregia 14.1 25 30 2 Basalcavity Fair Removal

143 143 Juglansregia 14.2 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

144 144 Juglansregia 12.8 35 30 1 Good Good Removal 9

145 145 Juglansregia 27.9 30 28 1 Good Good Removal

146 146 Juglansregia 25.9 40 30 1 Good Good Removal

147 147 Juglansregia 16.1 15 18 1 Good Good Removal

148 148 Juglansregia 56.7 45 38 1 Good Good Removal

149 149 Juglansregia 27.9 45 45 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

150 150 Juglansregia 30 25 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

151 151 Juglansregia 21.5 30 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

152 152 Juglansregia 21.4 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

153 153 Juglansregia 19.7 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

154 154 Juglansregia 44.6 40 30 1 Good Good Removal

155 155 Juglanscinerea 29.2 40 35 1 Good Good Retained

156 156 Juglansregia 41.7 50 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

157 157 Juglansregia 19.6 45 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

158 158 Juglansregia 20.7 35 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

159 159 Juglansregia 36.9 35 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

160 160 Juglansregia 24.1 35 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

161 161 Juglansregia 19.6 30 28 1 Good Good Removal

162 162 Juglansregia 12.4 18 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

163 163 Juglansregia 13.4 18 23 3 Heavylean,basalcavity Poor Removal 10

164 164 Juglansregia 16 25 25 3 Heavylean,mistletoe Fair Removal

165 165 Juglansregia 17.2 25 30 3 Heavymistletoe Poor Removal

166 166 Juglansregia 22.7 28 30 1 Good Good Removal

167 167 Juglansregia 26.9 30 28 1 Good Good Removal

168 168 Juglansregia 16.1 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

169 169 Juglansregia 20.1 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

170 170 Juglansregia 19 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

171 171 Juglansregia 23.3 30 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

172 172 Juglansregia 18.8 28 32 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

173 173 Juglansregia 18.7 35 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

174 174 Juglansregia 22.1 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

175 175 Juglansregia 19.9 30 32 1 Good Good Removal

176 176 Juglansregia 25.9 35 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

177 177 Juglansregia 24.2 28 35 2 Mistletoe,basalcavity Fair Removal

178 178 Juglansregia 30.5 24 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

179 179 Juglansregia 18 18 28 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

180 180 Juglansregia 29.4 25 32 1 Good Good Removal

181 181 Juglansregia 55 65 60 1 Good Good Removal

182 182 Juglansregia 29.6 50 50 1 Good Good Removal 11

183 183 Juglansregia 19.6 20 25 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

184 184 Juglansregia 22.3 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

185 185 Juglansregia 21.5 30 28 1 Good Good Removal

186 186 Juglansregia 41 45 45 1 Good Good Removal

187 187 Juglansregia 48.8 45 50 1 Good Good Removal

188 188 Juglansregia 16.3 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

189 189 Juglansregia 14.7 35 30 1 Good Good Removal

190 190 Juglansregia 29.8 50 40 1 Good Good Removal

191 191 Juglansregia 13.9 18 22 1 Good Good Removal

192 192 Juglansregia 32.7 50 45 3 Heavymistletoe Poor Removal

193 193 Juglansregia 25 20 25 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

194 194 Juglansregia 29 40 40 3 Heavymistletoe Poor Removal

195 195 Juglansregia 24.1 22 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

196 196 Juglansregia 25.5 25 40 1 Good Good Removal

197 197 Juglansregia 14.6 20 22 1 Good Good Removal

198 198 Juglansregia 30.1 25 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

199 199 Quercuswizlizenii 18.3 20 40 1 Good Good Removal

200 200 Juglanscinerea 21.2 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

201 201 Juglanscinerea 26.5 40 45 2 Brokenlimbs Poor Removal 12

202 202 Juglansregia 20.4 25 25 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

203 203 Juglansregia 17.3 25 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

204 204 Juglansregia 38.4 25 35 1 Good Good Removal

205 205 Juglansregia 17.8 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

206 206 Juglansregia 22.7 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

207 207 Juglansregia 37.2 25 50 1 Good Good Removal

208 208 Juglansregia 27.7 30 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

209 209 Juglansregia 18.5 30 29 1 Good Good Removal

210 210 Juglansregia 23.8 35 30 3 Heavymistletoe Poor Removal

211 211 Juglansregia 37.6 45 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

212 212 Juglansregia 34.9 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

213 213 Juglansregia 39.6 4.5 50 1 Good Good Removal

214 214 Juglansregia 28.2 40 35 1 Good Good Removal

215 215 Juglansregia 37.9 40 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

216 216 Juglansregia 17 35 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

217 217 Juglansregia 26.1 30 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

218 218 Juglansregia 12.2 20 25 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

219 219 Juglansregia 27.9 30 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

220 220 Caryapecan 31.1 45 45 1 Good Good Removal 13

TreeData.KassisPropertyArboristEvaluation.February2019.ProtectedTreesareaminimumof12"diameter. Diameter Canopy Measured Diameter Estimated Condition Suitabilityfor Anticipated Tree#Tag# Species at4.5feet (ft) Height(ft) Rating* GeneralHealth Preservation LevelofImpact

221 221 Juglansregia 31.5 45 45 1 Good Good Removal

222 222 Juglansregia 27.7 45 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

223 223 Juglansregia 23.5 40 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

224 224 Juglansregia 28.3 40 40 2 Good Good Removal

225 225 Juglansregia 23.5 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

226 226 Juglansregia 48.6 50 50 1 Good Good Removal

227 227 Juglansregia 16.5 30 25 1 GoodͲcuttrunks Good Removal

228 228 Juglansregia 13.5 28 25 1 Good Good Removal

229 229 Juglansregia 25.6 25.6 25 1 Good Good Removal

230 230 Juglansregia 17.4 20 25 1 Good Good Removal

231 231 Juglansregia 15.7 25 20 1 Good Good Removal

232 232 Caryapecan 25.2 30 25 2 PoorͲtrunkrot Poor Removal

233 233 Fraxinusvelutina 14.6 30 50 1 Good Good Removal

234 234 Fraxinusvelutina 15.4 40 45 1 Good Good Removal

235 235 Fraxinusvelutina 37.7 30 25 1 Good Good Removal

236 236 Juglansregia 12.1 25 25 2 Barksloughedoff Fair Removal

237 237 Juglansregia 27.5 25 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

238 238 Juglansregia 25.6 25 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

239 239 Juglansregia 12.8 25 20 2 Trunkrot,turkeytails Fair Removal

240 240 Juglansregia 16.1 30 22 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal 14

TreeData.KassisPropertyArboristEvaluation.February2019.ProtectedTreesareaminimumof12"diameter. Estimated Diameter Canopy Measured Diameter Estimated Condition Suitabilityfor Anticipated Tree#Tag# Species at4.5feet (ft) Height(ft) Rating* GeneralHealth Preservation LevelofImpact

241 241 Juglansregia 25.1 30 25 1 Good Good Removal

242 242 Juglansregia 16.3 30 25 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

243 243 Juglansregia 21.9 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

244 244 Juglansregia 18 30 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

245 245 Juglansregia 14.2 25 25 1 Good Fair Removal

246 246 Juglansregia 25.3 25 28 1 Good Good Removal

247 247 Juglansregia 15.1 25 25 2 FairͲmistletoe Fair Removal

248 248 Juglansregia 16.3 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

249 249 Juglansregia 19.8 35 35 1 Good Good Removal

250 250 Juglansregia 16.3 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

251 251 Juglansregia 20.9 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

252 252 Juglansregia 36.7 30 35 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

253 253 Juglansregia 24 25 30 1 Good Good Removal

254 254 Juglansregia 16.8 30 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

255 255 Juglansregia 28.7 30 30 1 Good,somemistletoe Good Removal

256 256 Juglansregia 25 25 25 1 Good,somemistletoe Good Removal

257 257 Juglansregia 13.2 20 25 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

258 258 Juglansregia 27.3 20 22 1 Good Good Removal

259 259 Juglansregia 24.1 25 25 1 Good Good Removal 15

260 260 Juglansregia 17.4 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

261 261 Juglansregia 59.2 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

262 262 Juglansregia 17 20 25 1 Good Good Removal

263 263 Juglansregia 21.7 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

264 264 Juglansregia 24.5 25 25 2 FairͲmistletoe Fair Removal

265 265 Juglansregia 26.3 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

266 266 Juglansregia 22.3 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

267 267 Juglansregia 30 25 25 2 FairͲtrunkrot Good Removal

268 268 Juglansregia 26.9 35 30 2 Mistletoe Fair Removal

269 269 Juglansregia 30.1 35 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

270 270 Juglansregia 15.7 30 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

271 271 Juglansregia 33.8 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

272 272 Juglansregia 27.5 35 30 1 Good Good Removal

273 273 Juglansregia 28.5 35 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

274 274 Juglansregia 21.6 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

275 275 Juglansregia 27.3 35 30 1 Good Good Removal

276 276 Juglansregia 27 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

277 277 Juglansregia 26.1 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

278 278 Juglansregia 15.5 25 35 2 FairͲtrunkrot Fair Removal 16

279 279 Juglansregia 14.9 28 30 1 Good Good Removal

280 280 Juglansregia 17.6 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

281 281 Juglansregia 15.2 30 35 1 Good Good Removal

282 282 Juglansregia 16.6 30 30 1 Good Good Removal

283 283 Juglansregia 18.9 25 30 2 Trunkrot Fair Removal

284 284 Ficuscarica 52.2 30 20 1 Good Good Removal

285 285 Ficuscarica 22.5 30 20 1 Good Good Removal

286 286 Citrus xparadisi 12.5 20 20 1 Good Good Removal

287 287 Juglansregia 16.4 18 20 1 Good Good Removal

288 288 Juglansregia 12.9 15 15 1 Good Good Removal

289 Ͳ Ligustrumjaponicum 16* 15 40 1 Canopyoverhangs2',good Good Retained

290 Ͳ Juglansregia 22* 35 40 2 Mistletoe Fair Retained

291 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 24* 30 45 2 Somedeadlimbs Fair Retained

292 Ͳ Pinusthunbergii 19* 12 45 1 Good Good Retained

293 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 32* 14 65 1 Good Good Retained

294 Ͳ S.sempervirens 30* 20 140 1 Good Good Retained

295 Ͳ S.sempervirens 34* 20 140 1 Good Good Retained

296 Ͳ Prunus sp.(nectarine) 12.5* 18 25 1 Good Good Retained

297 Ͳ Celtissinensis 60* 35 50 1 Good Good Retained 17

298 Ͳ Acer sp. 24* 25 35 1 Good Good Retained

299 Ͳ Prunus sp.(cherry) 13* 18 20 1 Good Good Retained

300 Ͳ Fraxinus sp. 38* 50 40 1 Good Good Retained

301 Ͳ Fraxinus sp. 34* 20 45 1 Good Good Retained

302 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 24* 22 100 1 Good Good Retained

303 Ͳ Fraxinus sp. 22* 25 40 1 Good Good Retained

304 Ͳ Sequoiasempervirens 28* 30 120 1 Good Good Retained

305 Ͳ Sequoiasempervirens 28* 30 120 1 Good Good Retained

306 Ͳ Sequoiasempervirens 28* 30 120 1 Good Good Retained

307 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 24* 25 80 1 Good Good Retained

308 Ͳ Juglansregia 42* 30 18 1 Good Good Retained

309 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 12* 15 15 1 Good Good Retained

310 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 8* 12 25 1 Good Good Retained

311 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 18* 25 25 1 Good Good Retained

312 Ͳ Juglansregia 18* 20 25 1 Good Good Retained

313 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 12* 18 18 1 Good Good Retained

314 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 28* 45 50 1 Good Good Retained

315 Ͳ Fraxniusvelutina 18* 25 40 1 Good Good Retained

316 Ͳ Fraxniusvelutina 14* 20 40 1 Good Good Retained 18

TreeData.KassisPropertyArboristEvaluation.February2019.ProtectedTreesareaminimumof12"diameter. Diameter Estimated Measured Canopy Estimated Condition Suitabilityfor Anticipated Tree#Tag# Species at4.5feet Diameter(ft) Height(ft) Rating* GeneralHealth Preservation LevelofImpact

317 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 19* 20 45 1 Good Good Retained

318 Ͳ Quercuslobata 22* 40 45 1 Good Good Retained

319 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 21.9 35 40 1 Good Good Retained

320 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 36.4 55 60 1 Good Good Retained

321 289 Juglansregia 20.2 25 25 1 Good Good Removal

322 Ͳ Quercuswizlizenii 8* 20 30 1 Trunkleansontosite,good Good Retained

323 Ͳ Sequoiasempervirens 20* 35 120 1 Good Good Retained

324 Ͳ Sequoiasempervirens 20* 35 120 1 Good Good Retained

325 Ͳ Ligustrumjaponicum 13* 40 35 1 Good Good Retained

326 Ͳ Prunus sp. 14* 40 60 1 Good Good Retained

327 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 24* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

328 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 20* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

329 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 26* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

330 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 24* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

331 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 19* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

332 Ͳ Cedrusdeodara 38* 30 100 1 Good Good Retained

333 Ͳ Ligustrumjaponicum 17.5 30 30 1 Good Good Retained

334 Ͳ Quercuslobata 32* 60 50 1 Good Good Retained

335 Ͳ Juglansregia 36* 50 30 1 Good Good Retained *=estimated Attachment 3 Selected Photographs of Protected Trees Proposed for Removal

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 45 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation

>ŝǀĞKĂŬƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ <ĂƐƐŝƐWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇƌďŽƌŝƐƚǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ

>ŝǀĞKĂŬƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ <ĂƐƐŝƐWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇƌďŽƌŝƐƚǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ Attachment 4 Tree Locations/Tree Removal Plan Kassis Property, Ranch Cordova

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 48 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation Detail "A" Detail "A" Detail maps 1"=120' LEGEND Project Boundary 322 Post & Cable Fence Detail "B" Proposed Trail 155 Preserved Tree & Number Tree to be Removed 329

330 332 333

Detail "B" 320

320 116

Detail "C" 318 317 110

Detail "C"

314

94 Detail "D"

313

312 311 310 309

308

Detail "D"

307

304 305 306 24 Live Oak Associates, Inc. 26 28 25 29 Kassis Property Preserved Trees & Trees to be Removed DateProject # Figure # 300' 0 150' 300 feet 9/30/2020 2332-01 approximate scale Attachment 5 Tree Protection Plan Kassis Property, Ranch Cordova

Live Oak Associates, Inc. 50 Kassis Property Arborist Evaluation Detail "A" Detail "A" LEGEND Project Boundary Detail "B" Post & Cable Fence Proposed Trail Preserved Tree & Number

Detail "B"

Detail "C"

Detail "D"

Live Oak Associates, Inc.

Kassis Property Tree Protection Plan DateProject # Figure # 300' 0 150' 300 feet 9/25/2020 2332-01 approximate scale