DOCSLIB.ORG

ARGENTINE HOKI BOTTOM and MID-WATER TRAWL FISHERY in ARGENTINE SEA (Macruronus Magellanicus ) Certificate Code: F-OIA-P-0300

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARGENTINE HOKI BOTTOM and MID-WATER TRAWL FISHERY in ARGENTINE SEA (Macruronus Magellanicus ) Certificate Code: F-OIA-P-0300 Public Comment Draft Report Assessment against MSC Principles and Criteria for: ARGENTINE HOKI BOTTOM AND MID-WATER TRAWL FISHERY IN ARGENTINE SEA (Macruronus magellanicus ) Certificate code: F-OIA-P-0300 14 th July 2017 AUTHORS : Dr. E. M. Morsan (Team Leader), Mr. Italo Campodónico, Lic. Gabriel Sesar and Eng. C. A. Medina Foucher (MSC Program Manager) CLIENTS: San Arawa S.A., Estremar S.A. and Empresa Pesquera de la Patagonia y Antártida S.A. (PESANTAR) PUBLIC COMMENT D RAFT REPOR T (P CDR) Assessment against MSC Principles and Criteria for ARGENTINE HOKI IN ARGENTINE SEA (Macruronus magellanicus ) 14th July 2017 CLIENTS: San Arawa S.A. Contact: Eduardo González Lemmi Address: Av. Perito Moreno 2552, (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Prov., Argentina Tel: (+54 223) 495 4789 Empresa Pesquera de La Patagonia y Antártida S.A. (PESANTAR) Contact: Fabian Carrasco Address: Av. Perito Moreno 3360, (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Prov., Argentina Tel: (+54 11) 5368 2800 Estremar S.A. Contact: Alan Mackern Address: Rivadavia 130 Floor 3 Of. 309, (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Prov., Argentina Tel: (+54 11) 5218 0178 CERTIFICATION BODY: Organización Internacional Agropecuaria S.A. (OIA) Address: Av. Santa Fe 830, Acassuso (B1641ABN), Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel/Fax: (+54) 11 4793-4340 [email protected] | www.oia.com.ar Document: AH – Public Comment Draft Report ……………………… …………………………………………… 2 Date of issue: 14th July 2017 Contents. Glossary. .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Executive summary. ........................................................................................................................ 6 2. Authorship and peer reviewers. ...................................................................................................... 9 3. Description of the Fishery. ............................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and scope of certification sought ............................................ 12 3.1.1 UoA and proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) ............................................................. 12 3.1.2 Final UoC(s) ................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data ................................................................. 14 3.1.4 Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced fisheries ................................................ 15 3.1.5 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Introduced Species Based Fisheries (ISBF) .......... 15 3.2 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Background of the fishery ............................................................................................. 15 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ............................................................................ 18 3.4 Principle two: ecosystem background ................................................................................... 22 3.4.1 Primary species ............................................................................................................. 26 3.4.2 Secondary species ......................................................................................................... 26 3.4.3 ETP species .................................................................................................................... 31 3.4.4 Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 41 3.4.5 Ecosystem ...................................................................................................................... 45 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .............................................................. 47 3.5.1 Fishery area of operation ............................................................................................. 47 3.5.2 Consultation and decision-making processes .............................................................. 51 3.5.3 Objectives for the fishery ............................................................................................. 52 3.5.4 Monitoring, control and surveillance and enforcement .............................................. 54 4. Evaluation Procedure. ................................................................................................................... 57 4.1 Harmonised fishery assessment ............................................................................................ 57 4.2 Previous assessments ............................................................................................................ 57 4.3 Assessment methodologies ................................................................................................... 64 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ................................................................................... 64 4.4.1 Site visits ....................................................................................................................... 64 4.4.2 Consultations ................................................................................................................ 65 4.4.3 Evaluation techniques ................................................................................................... 66 5. Traceability. ................................................................................................................................... 67 Document: AH – Public Comment Draft Report ……………………… …………………………………………… 3 Date of issue: 14th July 2017 5.1 Eligibility date ........................................................................................................................ 67 5.2 Traceability within the fishery ............................................................................................... 67 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ........................................................................ 70 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ............................................................................................................................................... 70 6. Evaluation Results. ............................................................................................................................ 71 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................................ 71 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores ................................................................................................... 71 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 72 6.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 72 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................................. 72 6.6 Changes in the fishery prior to and since Pre-Assessment ................................................... 73 7. References. .................................................................................................................................... 74 Appendices. ........................................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix 1. Scoring and Rationales .............................................................................................. 78 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale .................................................. 78 Appendix 1.2 Conditions...................................................................................................... 129 Appendix 2. Peer review reports ................................................................................................. 144 Appendix 3. Stakeholder submissions ......................................................................................... 179 Appendix 4. Surveillance Frequency ........................................................................................... 182 Appendix 5. Objections Process .................................................................................................. 183 Document: AH – Public Comment Draft Report ……………………… …………………………………………… 4 Date of issue: 14th July 2017 Glossary. BRo Virginal Reproductive Biomass CFP Consejo Federal Pesquero CoC Chain of Custody DNPP Dirección Nacional de Planificacion Pesquera ETPs Endangered, Threatened, Protected species FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FCRv2.0 Fisheries Certification Requirements v2.0 IBMPAS Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almte. Storni IFOP Instituto de Fomento Pesquero INIDEP Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero IPI Inseparable or Practically Inseparable ISBF Introduced Species Based Fisheries ITQs Individual Transferable Quotas LRP Limit Reference Point MINCyT Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva MSC Marine Stewardship Council NGOs Non-Gobernemental Organization OIA Organización Internacional Agropecuaria OSC Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil PDR Preliminary Draft Report RBF Risk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016
    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
    [Show full text]
  • Toxins in Shellfish from Argentine Patagonian Coast
    Heliyon 5 (2019) e01979 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.heliyon.com Spatiotemporal distribution of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins in shellfish from Argentine Patagonian coast Leilen Gracia Villalobos a,*, Norma H. Santinelli b, Alicia V. Sastre b, German Marino c, Gaston O. Almandoz d,e a Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos (CESIMAR-CONICET), Boulevard Brown 2915 (U9120ACD), Puerto Madryn, Argentina b Instituto de Investigacion de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Gales 48 (U9100CKN), Trelew, Argentina c Direccion Provincial de Salud Ambiental, Ministerio de Salud de la Provincia del Chubut, Ricardo Berwin 226 (U9100CXF), Trelew, Argentina d Division Ficología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n (B1900FWA), La Plata, Argentina e Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917 (C1033AAV), Buenos Aires, Argentina ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Harmful algal blooms (HABs) have been recorded in the Chubut Province, Argentina, since 1980, mainly asso- Environmental science ciated with the occurrence of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins produced by dinoflagellates of the genus Aquatic ecology Alexandrium. PSP events in this area impact on fisheries management and are also responsible for severe human Marine biology intoxications by contaminated shellfish. Within the framework of a HAB monitoring program carried out at Environmental risk assessment several coastal sites along the Chubut Province, we analyzed spatiotemporal patterns of PSP toxicity in shellfish Environmental toxicology – Toxicology during 2000 2011. The highest frequency of mouse bioassays exceeding the regulatory limit for human con- Alexandrium catenella sumption was detected in spring and summer, with average values of up to 70% and 50%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensisand Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity. There has been a marked increase in the number of published studies for both species since 2000, and especially after 2005, although some research topics remain poorly understood. Considering the external morphological similarities of longnose skates, especially when juvenile, and the potential niche overlap in both, depth and latitude it is recommended that reproductive seasonality, connectivity and population structure be assessed to ensure their long-term sustainability. Keywords: conservation biology; fishery; roughskin skate; South America; yellownose skate Introduction Edited by Juan Carlos Salcedo-Reyes & Andrés Felipe Navia Global threats to sharks, skates and rays have been 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Draft Report November 1999 the Marine Resources Assessment Group
    Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Draft Report November 1999 The Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) Report, 1999 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 6 General Background ....................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 8 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 9 Study Scope and Objectives............................................................................................ 9 Background To This Study ......................................................................................... 9 Overall Objective of the Biodiversity of the Patagonia Shelf Study .......................... 9 Overall Study Activities.............................................................................................. 9 The Economic Evaluation Focuses on the Following Activities.............................. 10 Defining Biological Diversity................................................................................... 10 1.1. Prioritized Threats to Biodiversity........................................................................ 11 1.1.1. Overexploitation ............................................................................................ 12 1.1.2. Physical
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensis and Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Universitas Scientiarum ISSN: 0122-7483 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia Vargas-Caro, Carolina; Bustamante, Carlos; Lamilla, Julio; Bennett, Michael B. A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Universitas Scientiarum, vol. 20, núm. 3, 2015, pp. 321-359 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49941379004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Sharks: a Review of Action and Inaction
    The Future of Sharks: A Review of Action and Inaction January 2011 By Mary Lack and Glenn Sant JIM ABERNETHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations The authors wish to acknowledge the input provided or The Pew Charitable Trusts concerning the legal by a number of TRAFFIC network regional staff and status of any country, territory or area, or of its to thank staff from the Pew Environment Group and authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its TRAFFIC for helpful comments on the draft report. frontiers or boundaries. Published by TRAFFIC International (Cambridge, U.K.) The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and registered and the Pew Environment Group (Washington, D.C.). trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. © 2011 TRAFFIC International and the Pew Environment Group. CITATION: M. Lack and Sant G. (2011). The Future of Sharks: A All rights reserved. Review of Action and Inaction. TRAFFIC International and the Pew Environment Group. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a must credit TRAFFIC International and the Pew threat to the conservation of nature. Environment Group as the copyright owner. The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm The views of the authors expressed in this publication of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nongovernmental do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC organization that applies a rigorous, analytical network, WWF and the Pew Environment Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop on Deep-Sea Species Identification, Rome, 2–4 December 2009
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 Cover photo: An aggregation of the hexactinellid sponge Poliopogon amadou at the Great Meteor seamount, Northeast Atlantic. Courtesy of the Task Group for Maritime Affairs, Estrutura de Missão para os Assuntos do Mar – Portugal. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this Information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • These De Doctorat De
    THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’AGROCAMPUS OUEST COMUE UNIVERSITE BRETAGNE LOIRE ECOLE DOCTORALE N° 598 Sciences de la Mer et du littoral Spécialité : Halieutique Par Florianne MARANDEL Evaluation de l’état des populations de raie bouclée Thèse présentée et soutenue à Nantes, le 19 septembre 2018 Unité de recherche : Unité Ecologie et Modèle pour l’Halieutique, IFREMER Thèse N° : 2018-16 H-105 Rapporteurs avant soutenance : Composition du Jury : Jennifer Ovenden - Professeur, Université de Brisbane Nigel, Gilles, Yoccoz - Professeur, Université Arctique de Nigel, Gilles Yoccoz - Professeur, Université Arctique de Norvège Norvège Nicolas Bez - Directeur de recherche, IRD Olivier Lepais - Chercheur, INRA Marie Savina-Rolland - Chercheuse, IFREMER Président Yannick Outreman - Professeur, Agrocampus-Ouest Directeur de thèse Verena M. Trenkel - Chercheuse, IFREMER Invité Pascal Lorance - Chercheur, IFREMER T H È S E D E D O C T O R A T É V A L U A T I O N D E L ' É T A T D E S P O P U L A T I O N S D E R A I E B O U C L É E 2 0 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 P R É P A R É E P A R F L O R I A N N E M A R A N D E L S O U S L A D I R E C T I O N D E V E R E N A M . T R E N K E L & P A S C A L L O R A N C E Remerciements En tout premier lieu, je remercie chaleureusement mes deux directeurs de thèse de m’avoir fait confiance pendant ces 3,5 ans.
    [Show full text]
  • South America REGIONAL REPORT
    United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals Eastern and Western South America REGIONAL REPORT Regionally Based Assessment of Persistent Available from: UNEP Chemicals 11-13, chemin des Anémones CH-1219 Châtelaine, GE Switzerland Phone : +41 22 917 1234 Fax : +41 22 797 3460 Substances E-mail: [email protected] December 2002 http://www.chem.unep.ch UNEP Chemicals is a part of UNEP's Technology, Industry and Printed at United Nations, Geneva Economics Division GE.03-00163–January 2003–300 UNEP/CHEMICALS/2003/11 Global Environment Facility UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME CHEMICALS RReeggiioonnaallllyy BBaasseedd AAsssseessssmmeenntt ooff PPeerrssiisstteenntt TTooxxiicc SSuubbssttaanncceess Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay EEAASSTTEERRNN AANNDD WWEESSTTEERRNN SSOOUUTTHH AAMMEERRIICCAA RREEGGIIOONNAALL RREEPPOORRTT DECEMBER 2002 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY This report was financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) through a global project with co- financing from the Governments of Australia, France, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States of America. This publication is produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC). This publication is intended to serve as a guide. While the information provided is believed to be accurate, UNEP disclaim any responsibility for the possible inaccuracies or omissions and consequences, which may flow from them. UNEP nor any individual involved in the preparation of this report shall be liable for any injury, loss, damage or prejudice of any kind that may be caused by any persons who have acted based on their understanding of the information contained in this publication. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle Atlas of the Falklands War 1982
    ACLARACION DE www.radarmalvinas.com.ar El presente escrito en PDF es transcripción de la versión para internet del libro BATTLE ATLAS OF THE FALKLANDS WAR 1982 by Land, Sea, and Air de GORDON SMITH, publicado por Ian Allan en 1989, y revisado en 2006 Usted puede acceder al mismo en el sitio www.naval-history.com Ha sido transcripto a PDF y colocado en el sitio del radar Malvinas al sólo efecto de preservarlo como documento histórico y asegurar su acceso en caso de que su archivo o su sitio no continúen en internet, ya que la información que contiene sobre los desplazamientos de los medios británicos y su cronología resultan sumamente útiles como información británica a confrontar al analizar lo expresado en los diferentes informes argentinos. A efectos de preservar los derechos de edición, se puede bajar y guardar para leerlo en pantalla como si fuera un libro prestado por una biblioteca, pero no se puede copiar, editar o imprimir. Copyright © Penarth: Naval–History.Net, 2006, International Journal of Naval History, 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BATTLE ATLAS OF THE FALKLANDS WAR 1982 NAVAL-HISTORY.NET GORDON SMITH BATTLE ATLAS of the FALKLANDS WAR 1982 by Land, Sea and Air by Gordon Smith HMS Plymouth, frigate (Courtesy MOD (Navy) PAG Introduction & Original Introduction & Note to 006 Based Notes Internet Page on the Reading notes & abbreviations 008 book People, places, events, forces 012 by Gordon Smith, Argentine 1. Falkland Islands 021 Invasion and British 2. Argentina 022 published by Ian Allan 1989 Response 3. History of Falklands dispute 023 4. South Georgia invasion 025 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Mean Level of Argentine Sea
    DETERMINATION OF MEAN LEVEL OF ARGENTINE SEA Influences of Oscillations of the Sea not Caused by the Tide by Marciano A . BALAY, Chief, Tidal Division Note by Directing Committee of I.H .B. : The « Argentine Sea » mentioned in the following article is stated to include : « The whole of the continental shelf from the shore to the slope determined by the Argentine Atlantic Trench in the East and Drake Passage in the South ». This area has not however been listed in the Bureau’s Special Publication No. 23 « Limits of Oceans and Seas », nor has the name « Argentine Atlantic Trench » been so far adopted by the International Committee on Ocean Bottom Features. Introduction. Mean sea level is defined in principle as the surface where the tide is zero, and is determined by integration of the tide curve. Integration of the tide curve -may be accomplished mechanically and simultaneously by recording the tide by means of an « integrating tide-gauge », or by computation, i.e. by determining the arithmetical mean of hourly heights of the tide, previously obtained over an extensive observational period. The tide curve, however, is not only the graphical expression of oscillations in sea-level due to lunisolar action, since it likewise totalizes all the effects of disturbing agents unrelated to the tide proper, and principally the action of the enveloping atmosphere. Integration of the recorded tide curve will therefore not represent the « zero-tide surface », since the character of random action cannot be attributed with accuracy to influences of factors unrelated to the tide, even when a long series of observations is analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invertebrate Biodiversity from the Argentine Sea, South Western Atlantic
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 791: 47–70Marine (2018) invertebrate biodiversity from the Argentine Sea, South Western Atlantic 47 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.791.22587 DATA PAPER http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Marine invertebrate biodiversity from the Argentine Sea, South Western Atlantic Gregorio Bigatti1,2,3, Javier Signorelli1 1 Laboratorio de Reproducción y Biología Integrativa de Invertebrados Marinos, (LARBIM) IBIOMAR-CO- NICET. Bvd. Brown 2915 (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina 2 Universidad Nacional de la Pata- gonia San Juan Bosco, Boulevard Brown 3051, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina 3 Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Ecuador Corresponding author: Javier Signorelli ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Stoev | Received 13 December 2017 | Accepted 7 September 2018 | Published 22 October 2018 http://zoobank.org/ECB902DA-E542-413A-A403-6F797CF88366 Citation: Bigatti G, Signorelli J (2018) Marine invertebrate biodiversity from the Argentine Sea, South Western Atlantic. ZooKeys 791: 47–70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.791.22587 Abstract The list of marine invertebrate biodiversity living in the southern tip of South America is compiled. In particular, the living invertebrate organisms, reported in the literature for the Argentine Sea, were checked and summarized covering more than 8,000 km of coastline and marine platform. After an exhaustive lit- erature review, the available information of two centuries of scientific contributions is summarized. Thus, almost 3,100 valid species are currently recognized as living in the Argentine Sea. Part of this dataset was uploaded to the OBIS database, as a product of the Census of Marine Life-NaGISA project.
    [Show full text]