DOCSLIB.ORG

LATVIA in REVIEW September 13 – 20, 2011 Issue 37

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LATVIA in REVIEW September 13 – 20, 2011 Issue 37 LATVIA IN REVIEW September 13 – 20, 2011 Issue 37 CONTENTS Government Harmony Center Wins Snap Elections in Latvia 63 MPs from Dissolved Latvian Parliament have been Re-elected Unity Expects ZRP to Pick Third Partner in Would-Be Ruling Coalition in Latvia Harmony Center Leader: Latvia Should Hold Referendum on Euro Adoption Harmony Center, Zatlers Reform Party, Unity Share Many Similar Views Timeline of the Latvian Government’s Decisions in Relation to airBaltic Baltijas Aviācijas Sistēmas Asked to Immediately Meet the Government’s Conditions Economics Outcome of Latvian Elections May have Positive effect on Financial Market Latvian Government to Sign Protocol of Intent with IBM Purchases of Capital Goods Continue to Account for the Current Account Deficit Latvian Foreign Tourism Shows its Best Result Yet in 2011 Foreign Affairs Kristovskis to Take Part in 66th Session of UN General Assembly in New York EU Multi-Annual Budget - Negotiations between PMs of Finland and Latvia PM Calls on Poland to Defend Latvia’s Interests of Latvia During EU Presidency Foreign Minister Kristovskis Expresses Support to Georgia Latvia and Kazakhstan Sign Intergovernmental Agreement Latvia to Join Open Government Partnership Initiative Latvian President, NATO Secretary General Agree on Main Issues on NATO Agenda EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework – Latvia’s Top Priority during Polish Presidency Kristovskis Defends Latvia’s Interests Regarding EU Budget in Brussels Society 14,085 Voters Abroad Took Part in Early Elections of the 11th Saeima Articles of Interest Bloomberg News: “Latvian Parties Agree on Budget, Euro as Coalition Talks Begin” The Economist: “Snap Election Falls Flat” New York Times: “Gains of Pro-Russian Party in Latvia Show Worries on Economy and Graft” Latvians Online: “Election Turnout Abroad Best Since 1993; London Again Sees Most Voters” Associated Press: “Pro-Russia Party Wins Snap Latvian Election” BBC: “Pro-Russia Party Wins Most Votes in Latvia Election” Government Harmony Center Wins Snap Elections in Latvia On September 20, the Latvian Central Election Commission (CVK) produced preliminary results of the September 17 snap elections with votes counted from all polling stations. Those results show convincing victory of the leftist pro-Russia Harmony Center with 28.36 percent of votes, the Baltic News Service reported. According to the Rīga-based newswire, with votes from all 1,027 polling stations counted, the Harmony Center has received 259,930 votes or 28.36 percent; the newly-founded centrist Zatlers Reform Party (ZRP), 190,853 votes or 20.82 percent; the center-right Unity bloc, 172,567 votes 1 or 18.83 percent; the nationalist conservative National Alliance, 127,208 votes or 13.88 percent; and the center-right the Greens and Farmers Union (ZZS), 111,955 votes or 12.22 percent. According to BNS, no other parties have been able to rise above the statutory 5-percent threshold in the elections in Latvia. In the Rīga electoral district, which, in addition to the polling stations in the Latvian capital, includes also all polling stations organized abroad, the Harmony Center received 41.45 percent of votes, BNS reported. BNS also reported that information from all 235 polling stations organized in Rīga and abroad shows that the Harmony Center received 118,079 votes or 41.54 percent of all votes cast in the Rīga electoral district. The Unity was in second place in the Rīga electoral district, with 17.41 percent or 49,479 votes, and the ZRP was in the third place, with 15.12 percent or 42,977 votes. The National Alliance received 13.4 percent or 38,086 votes, and the ZZS received 5.99 percent or 17,028 votes, BNS reported. According to the BNS newswire, Harmony Center scored a convincing victory in two of the five electoral districts – the Rīga district and the Latgale district in eastern Latvia; but the ZRP received the largest number of votes in the three remaining electoral districts – Zemgale in southern Latvia, Vidzeme in north-eastern part of the country, and Kurzeme in the west. BNS also reported that the CVK said earlier that the Harmony Center had won 32 seats in the 100-member Latvian parliament, the ZRP will have 22 seats, the Unity 20 seats, the National Alliance 14 seats, and the ZZS 13 seats. 63 MPs from Dissolved Latvian Parliament have been Re-elected As many as 63 lawmakers of the dissolved 100-seated Latvian parliament have been re-elected, according to estimations by the Baltic News Service based on the preliminary list of lawmakers elected to the parliament published by the Central Elections Commission (CVK) after the snap parliament elections on Saturday, September 17. According to the Rīga-based newswire, the majority of changes have been brought to the parliament by the newly-founded Zatlers Reform Party (ZRP). There are only two lawmakers among the 22 MPs from ZRP who have experience in the parliament – Klāvs Olšteins, who had been elected from the Unity bloc earlier, and Romualds Ražuks, who worked in the parliament several years ago. BNS also reported that the faction of the leftist pro-Russian Harmony Center – the winner of the elections, who will have 31 seats at the parliament – have seven new lawmakers, including three women. There are two new lawmakers among the 20 mandates for the Unity bloc, BNS reported, while the National Alliance will have eight new lawmakers who have not worked in the previous parliament among the 14 lawmakers elected to this parliament. Meanwhile, according to BNS, the Greens and Farmers Union (ZZS) faction will not have any new lawmakers, as voters have shown support to the 13 party members who already worked in the previous parliament. According to BNS, it is not excluded that the number of new lawmakers will grow after some of the current lawmakers are named for the government. BNS reported that the CVK will release official results of the September 17 snap elections no later than in three weeks. Unity Expects ZRP to Pick Third Partner in Would-Be Ruling Coalition in Latvia The center-right Unity bloc expects the newly-founded centrist Zatlers Reform Party (ZRP) to name the third partner in the would-be ruling coalition to be formed in Latvia after the September 17 snap elections, Solvita Āboltiņa, one of Unity‟s leaders, told the press after the meeting of the bloc‟s board on September 19, the Baltic News Service reported. 2 According to the Rīga-based newswire, when asked how long it would take to form the new ruling coalition, Āboltiņa said only that the Unity believed that the coalition government should be formed within a month, which is also the statutory deadline for formation of the new government. “We hope to make some progress tomorrow. At present it is very important to understand what is the ZRP idea of the ruling coalition,” the Unity representative was quoted as saying, pointing out that the ZRP had received the second largest number of votes in the snap elections. At the same time, according to BNS, Unity believes that it has the best candidate prime minister – Latvia‟s current Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis. “We have the best candidate prime minister but no offices and spheres of responsibility have been discussed in the talks so far, we have only discussed programmatic objectives,” Āboltiņa was quoted as saying. An inquiry about the possibility of the Unity being left out of the would-be ruling coalition only made the bloc‟s leaders smile, BNS reported. “No, the most realistic ruling coalition would be tripartite –Unity, ZRP, and then there is the question about the third partner in the coalition,” Dombrovskis was quoted as saying. According to BNS, the Unity board was on Monday informed about the results of the talks about formation of the new ruling coalition held so far and gave the party leaders a mandate to continue the talks. “We are still open to [cooperation with], first of all, ZRP, then the National Alliance and the Harmony Center, and the board‟s mandate was to proceed along those lines,” Āboltiņa said. BNS also reported that on Tuesday morning, September 20, Unity had a meeting with the ZRP representatives and will also arrange for the second round in the talks with the Harmony Center and the National Alliance. “We are pleased with the triumph of the rule-of-law. The first round of the talks did not reveal any dramatic differences,” Āboltiņa told BNS, describing the talks already held with the parties elected to the new Latvian parliament. Harmony Center Leader: Latvia Should Hold Referendum on Euro Adoption Latvia should hold a referendum on the euro adoption, said Nils Ušakovs, the Rīga City Mayor and the leader of the leftist pro-Russia Harmony Center, who won the snap parliament elections on Saturday, in an interview with Latvian daily Diena on September 19, the Baltic News Service reported. The euro adoption in Latvia, in his words, depends on stability of the eurozone. “There are many factors that we may not influence -- stability of the eurozone and the future. We should meet all possible criteria to be able to discuss already in 2013 whether a referendum on the euro adoption in necessary,” Ušakovs was quoted as saying. He believes that it would be right to allow people to voice their opinions about support to the adoption of the euro. “It is related with the state symbol, with a very serious step in the development of the country. It is not about how we will fight inflation or form the government budget. The question about replacing the lat with the euro is very important and a referendum would be the right format to decide on it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elections in Latvia: Status Quo for Minorities Remains?
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 9, No 1, 2010, 72-89 Original received: 08.12.2010 Copyright © ECMI 2010 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2010/Latvia_Elections.pdf Elections in Latvia: status quo for minorities remains? Tatyana Bogushevitch and Aleksejs Dimitrovs * This article comments on the results of the recent parliamentary elections in Latvia and related implications for ethnic minorities. The authors examine in detail the pre-election programs, follow the developments before and after the elections, and come to the conclusion that the existing situation in the field of ethnic policy will remain in place for some time. Parliamentary elections took place in Latvia on 2 October 2010. Due to economic crisis and harsh austerity measures including severe public spending cuts, ethnic policy issues have not been very high on the agenda in the pre-election and post- election period, unlike in previous years. Nevertheless, in the country where more than 40% of the population are persons belonging to minorities 1, minority issues are inevitably a part of the national debate. After the elections, five alliances are represented in the Saeima (Parliament): centre-right ‘Unity’ (33 seats out of 100), social democratic ‘Concord Centre’ (29 seats), centre-right Union of Greens and Farmers (22 seats), right-wing nationalistic ‘All for Latvia’ – ‘For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK’ (8 seats) and centrist ‘For a Good Latvia’ (8 seats). Out of the 100 members 15 (13 ethnic Russians, 1 Karelian * Dr Tatyana Bogushevitch is a graduate of the University of Latvia, Riga.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality and Governance in Latvia
    IN DEFIANCE OF FATE Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Latvia Artis Pabriks 2003 Part of UNRISD Project on Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector. All unauthorized citation, duplication or distribution prohibited without the approval of UNRISD and the authors. Introduction This report discuss the issue of ethnic equality and governance in respect to socio- political stability in Latvia from the historic perspective. Latvia, just like the overwhelming majority of modern states is multi-ethnic and multi-cultural country. Latvian history and geography is a relevant factor in order to understand the dynamics of ethnic relations and ethnopolitics. Geopolitically, Latvia is squeezed on the shores of the Baltic between larger powers, Russia, Germany, Poland, and Sweden. Time to time, each of these countries was eager to dominate the region and its population by political, economic, and cultural means thus influencing Latvia’s ethnic composition as well as ethnic relations. During the two World Wars of the 20th century, country was twice turned into extensive war zone. It has experienced several occupations and dominance of totalitarian ideologies. Latvia was ruled by democratic, authoritarian, and totalitarian regimes one after another. It has experienced market economy as well as centralized communist rule. Its population went through economically wealthy periods and faced hunger. People of Latvia have experienced respect and humanity in their mutual relations just like they have been facing terror, humiliation, deportations and death. Most of political analysts would argue that these are not conditions favouring independent and democratic statehood. Indeed, the world, even Europe knows dozens of ethnic groups and nations much larger in size and in economic power which never have experienced their own statehood.
    [Show full text]
  • Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies
    Identity and Agency: Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies Benjamin P. McClelland Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Benjamin P. McClelland All Rights Reserved Abstract Identity and Agency: Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies Benjamin P. McClelland This dissertation examines how ethnic identities are politicized through elections in new democracies. Using the cases of post-communist Latvia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, I compare the electoral success of campaigns which appeal to voters on the basis of ethnicity to those do not. I argue that ethnic parties are most likely in groups for whom two conditions are met. First, ethnicity must meaningfully differentiate ethnic insiders from outsiders, in such a way that voters will believe policy benefits will likely result from political representation for the group. Second, electoral institutions must ensure that the political mobilization of the group will result in electoral victory. These two conditions create fundamentally different incentives for ethnic majority groups and ethnic minority groups simply because of differences in group size. In most democracies with a large minority population, ethnic voting will be more likely among the majority group than the minority group, unless institutions encourage minority group voting by lowering barriers to entry. The results demonstrate the qualitatively different ways groups use ethnic identities as a resource to achieve political objectives, with important implications for minority group representation, political participation, and democratic governance in diverse societies. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Why Study Ethnic Voting? .
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Parliamentary (Saeima) Election
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF LATVIA PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 7 October 2006 OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 8 February 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND................................................................................................................... 3 IV. ELECTION SYSTEM................................................................................................................................. 3 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................ 4 A. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 4 B. CANDIDACY RIGHTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Lustration Provisions........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Limitation on the Right of Individuals to Be Elected ........................................................................... 6 C. CITIZENSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • Russians in Latvia: Ethnic Identity and Ethnopolitical Change
    Russians in Latvia: Ethnic Identity and Ethnopolitical Change Aadne Aasland Presented for the degree of Ph. D. University of Glasgow Institute of Russian & East European Studies May 1994 © Aadne Aasland ProQuest Number: 11007640 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007640 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract Over a very short period conditions for the Russian population in Latvia have changed dramatically. From being representatives of the majority nationality enjoying a special status in the Soviet multinational empire, Russians have become a national minority in a Latvian nation-state. The thesis focuses on the implications of these changes for the ethnic identity of Russians living in Latvia; the changes are analysed through the perspective of ethnopolitical developments in the country. An examination of relevant western and Latvian scholarly literature on ethnicity and nationality issues provides the theoretical framework within which to discuss the Russian question in Latvia. Conceptual issues are clarified and various explanations for the phenomenon of ethnicity are considered. The relationship between ethnicity and the political sphere is also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latvian Direct Democracy Tools in a Comparative European Context
    The Latvian direct democracy tools in a comparative European context OÑATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES VOLUME 10, ISSUE 4 (2020), 744-788: INVESTIGATIONS – INVESTIGACIONES – IKERLANAK DOI LINK: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1075 RECEIVED 03 APRIL 2019, ACCEPTED 03 SEPTEMBER 2019 FABIO RATTO TRABUCCO∗ Abstract This article analyses and compares the legal tools of direct democracy in Latvia and other European countries. Based on comparison, the author draws concludes the shortcomings of the legal framework of direct democracy in the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. The author analyses functioning of the direct democracy tools in Latvian practice and compares them with similar tools in other European countries, expressing his criticism towards Latvian legislation on the referendum and people’s initiative, finding that some mechanisms included in the Constitution are old- fashioned and ineffective. The article identifies actual shortcomings of the legal framework of the referendum and popular initiative both at the level of the Constitution and that of the law and makes suggestions for improvements of the mechanisms of direct democracy, particularly taking into account the experience of the other Baltic countries. Key words Latvia; national referendum; people’s initiative; parliamentary dissolution; recall referendum Resumen Este artículo analiza y compara las herramientas legales de la democracia directa en Letonia y en otros países europeos. Sobre la base de la comparación, el autor extrae conclusiones sobre las deficiencias del marco legal de la democracia directa letona. El autor analiza la legislación y la práctica letona sobre el referéndum y la iniciativa popular comparándola con las de otros países europeos, incluido el referéndum sobre la disolución del Parlamento, expresando críticas de que una serie de I wish to thank Profs.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Tribunal Against the Soviet Union in Copenhagen, July 25 Ahd 26, 1985
    PUBLISHED BY THENWORLD FEDERATION OF FREE LATVLANS Rockville, Maryland 20850 Edited by Ingrida Kalnins Cover Design by Teodors Liliensteins Photographs by Liutas Grinius Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 85 - 63678 TABLE OF CONTENTS * Preface .... ..... 1 by Olg'erts R. Pavlovskis, Ph.D. Chairman, Baltic World Conference * Introductory Remarks at the Baltic Tribunal . 2 by Olgerts R. Pavlovskis, Ph.D. Chairman, Baltic World Conference * The Indictment Against the Soviet Union . 3 Introduction .... 5 Indictment .... 6 -Conspiracy, aggression, and the illegal annexation of the Baltic States . 6 -Exploitation of the Baltic States . 7 -Deportation and systematic Russification of Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians with the purpose of eliminating their national identities, cultures, and languages . 8 -Violations of human rights . 9 Illegal actions of the Soviet Union . 9 -Soviet conspiracy against peace in Europe . 9 -Annexation of the Baltic States . 11 Intervention . 11 Occupation . 17 Annexation . 19 -Sovietization of the Baltic States . 24 Subjugation through terror . 25 Political subjugation . 27 Expropriation . 30 Colonization . 31 Economic exploitation . 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS Militarization . 45 Russification . 47 Genocide . 52 Violations of human rights 56 The Helsinki Agreement and the Baltic States 60 Summary . 62 References . .. 64 * The Panel of Judges Dr. Theodor Veiter, Chairman . 72 Per Ahlmark . 73 The Rev. Michael Bourdeaux . 74 Jean-Marie Daillet . 75 Sir James Fawcett . 76 * The Witnesses Kenneth Carter Benton Biography . 78 Testimony . .................................... 79 Rita Bruvere Biography . 83 Testimony . 84 Helena Celmina Biography . .. 92 Testimony . 94. Kestutis Jokubynas Biography . 100. Testimony . * . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 102 Imants Lesinskis Biography . 108 Testimony . : .. : : : : : : '. '. ., '. .. '. '. .. 1 0 9 Leila Miller Biography . 120 Testimony . .: . .. .. ., 121 TABLE OF CONTENTS Valdo Randpere Biography .
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Latvia
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF LATVIA PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 4 October 2014 OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report Warsaw 18 December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. 2 III. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 3 IV. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ............................................................................................ 3 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK............................................................................................ 4 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................ 4 VII. VOTER RIGHTS, REGISTRATION AND IDENTIFICATION .......................... 5 VIII. CANDIDATE RIGHTS AND REGISTRATION .................................................... 6 IX. NON-CITIZEN AND NATIONAL MINORITY PARTICIPATION ................... 7 X. CAMPAIGN ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 8 XI. CAMPAIGN FINANCE ............................................................................................. 9 A. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 9 B. CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES .................................................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Library of Latvian Socialists in San Francisco, California: Activities of the Early Latvian Political
    ZINāTNISKIE RAKSTI THE ROLE OF DIASPORA LATVIANS AND LATVIAN COMMUNITIES IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICS SINCE THE MID-19tH CENTURY EXPLORING THE LIBRARY OF LATVIAN SOCIALISTS IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA: ACTIVITIES OF THE EARLY LATVIAN POLITICAL EMIGRATION, 1905–19171* Elga Zālīte Doctor of history, Slavic and Eastern European Collections, International and Area Studies Group, Stanford University Libraries, United States. E-mail: [email protected] Using a unique collection of 380 books recently discovered in San Francisco, California, the article explores and highlights the political and cultural activ- ities of Latvian socialists in Northern California around 1905. The article analyzes the structure and contents of the San Francisco socialist library and shows how, in a process of describing three different identifying marks or ownership stamps, it is possible to trace the development of three separate Latvian socialist libraries. The article provides an overview of the historical evolution of the three Latvian socialist groups to whom the libraries belong- ed: the Lettish Socialist Labor Section in San Francisco, the Lettish Social- Democratic Group of San Francisco and the Lettish Branch of the Socialist Party in San Francisco. As part of the historical overview, the most impor- tant aspects of the Latvian political emigration to the United States before and after the 1905 Revolution are described. Using novel data from the ge- nealogy research website Ancestry.com, the article draws a concrete picture of individuals involved. The author has attempted to trace the attitudes of the Latvian immigrant groups in San Francisco and the decisions they made in relation to the wider socialist movement in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia by Juris Dreifelds and Valts Kalnin‚ Š
    Latvia by Juris Dreifelds and Valts Kalnin‚ š Capital: Riga Population: 2.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$21,820 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Civil Society 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Independent Media 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 2.00 National Democratic Governance 2.25 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.00 Local Democratic Governance 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Judicial Framework and Independence 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Corruption 3.50 3.25 3.00 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.00 3.00 Democracy Score 2.14 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.18 2.18 2.14 2.11 2.07 2.07 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Limited Election Observation Mission 2011 Early Parliamentary Elections in Latvia
    OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Limited Election Observation Mission 2011 Early Parliamentary Elections in Latvia INTERIM REPORT 25 August- 6 September 2011 9 September 2011 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Following dissolution of the Saeima (parliament), early parliamentary elections were called for 17 September; the last parliamentary elections were held in October 2010. The Saeima consists of 100 members elected under a proportional representation system with a five per cent nationwide threshold. The legal framework for elections remains largely unchanged except for a few provisions introduced in June and July to adapt to special conditions of early elections. Particularly, some election deadlines were shortened, and campaign spending limits were cut by half. Thirteen political parties and coalitions will compete in these elections. The key contenders include both governing alliances – ‘Unity’ and the ‘Union of Greens and Farmers’ (running separately), the opposition ‘Concord Centre’, seen as mainly representing the Russian language minority, and the ‘Zatlers’ Reform Party’ of the previous President, Valdis Zatlers. Altogether, 1,090 candidates are contesting these elections. The campaign has been rather low-key with very few billboards and rallies. Instead, political parties tend to focus on less expensive communication strategies such as small gatherings and use of internet and social networks. Due to the significant proportion of ethnic and linguistic minorities, as well as a considerable number of “non-citizens” without the right to vote, the campaign environment continues to be divided along ethnic lines. The elections are administered by a three-tiered structure of election commissions, comprising the Central Election Commission (CEC), 119 Municipal Election Commissions (MECs) and 1,027 Polling Station Commissions (PSCs).
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 European Parliament Elections in the Baltic States
    ANALYSIS Riga The 2019 European Parliament elections in the Baltic states DR DAUNIS AUERS, UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA May 2019 The three Baltic states showed a mixed profi le in the European Parliament elections. While Estonia and Lithuania were largely occupied with domestic events, Latvia expe- rienced a long, high-profi le campaign. At the same time all three countries showed that the European and the national level are closely interlinked and do interplay with each other. Due to a preferential voting logic in a proportional representation system all estab- lished political parties put forward lists containing candidates with either extensive political experience, current MEPs or high-profi le personalities. In this way they bene- fi ted from a pronounced experience/competence versus fresh-faces/innovation di- vide. The political cleavages present in many older Western European democracies were largely absent. The campaigning focused on economy, immigration and security is- sues as well as relations with Russia. With this the mainstream parties were the big- gest winners in the region, with the centrist European Peoples Party (EPP), the Social- ists and Democrats (S&D) and The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) winning 17 of the 25 seats in the region. The Greens/European Free Alliance (G/EFA) and the European Conservatives and reformists (ECR) each won three seats. Like in prior EP-elections rightwing populist and Eurosceptic parties did not manage to achieve a decisive electoral turnout but the issue may potentially grow with more vigour in the years to come. DAUNIS AUERS | THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES Riga Content Introduction .
    [Show full text]