The Moon, of Course
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FEATURE THE MOON, OF COURSE . By Walter Munk and Carl Wunsch THIS IS AN ESSAY* on tidal friction and pared with 2 × l0 ' GW associated with We now have independent estimates ocean mixing. Tides are not a subject at equator-to-pole heat-flux. of global dissipation from ancient the forefront of current interest. Many eclipses, from modern measurements of oceanographers believe the subject died Astronomy the length of day and month, and from with Victorian mathematicians. But The subject of tidal friction has a long the tidal perturbation of artificial satellite TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) altimetry and labored history of errors and miscon- orbits. They all agree within expected measurements have suggested an en- ceptions. Fundamental questions remain error limits. The most precise information hanced lunar role in ocean processes and about the interpretation given in this comes from lunar laser ranging using the put a new face on an ancient subject. In essay. A brief sketch will provide some retroflectors places on the Moon in 1969 contrast, oceanic mixing is alive (even perspective. during the Apollo mission. The semima- fashionable); we wish to convince the In 1695 Halley found that data on an- jot axis of the Moon's orbit is increasing reader that the connection between these cient eclipses could not be reconciled at a rate 3.82 _+ 0.07 cm/y, from which ancient subjects is deep, important, and with his "modern" measurements of the the above dissipation estimate of 2,500 _+ not obviously lunatic. Moon's orbit, and concluded that the 100 GW has been derived. About 100 The reader should hold in mind that Moon was being accelerated by 10 arc- GW is dissipated in bodily tides leaving we are dealing with two quite distinct sec/centuryL This was confirmed by sub- 2400 -+ 100 GW M 2. manifestations of ocean mixing: 1) sequent observations. Euler and La- pehtgic turbulence (away from topogra- grange tried in vain to account for the 3500 GW all tides (1) phy) is associated with a diapycnal diffu- acceleration in terms of Newtonian me- sivity of order KeE = 10 5 mVs and a chanics. The role of tidal friction was The Moon donfinates (and is empha- global dissipation of 200 GW (1 gigawatt proposed in 1754 by Emanuel Kant in an sized in this essay), but the solar tides are = lff' W); 2) the maintenance of abyssal essay "Untersuchung der Frage, ob die by no means negligible. The extension to stratification requires order (2,000 GW) Erde in ihrer Umdrehung um die Achse, all semidiurnal and diurnal tides is com- and is associated with concentrated turbu- wodurch sic die Abwechslung des Tages plex on account of the nonlinear interac- lence at the ocean boundaries and over und der Nacht hervorbringt, eine Veraen- tions (LeProvost and Lyard, 1997). submarine ridges and other topographic derung seit der ersten Zeiten ihres Ur- features, often (improperly) represented sprunges erlitten babe, und woraus man Dissipation in Marginal Seas by a global mean diffusivity of KAS = 104 sich ihrer versichern koennen" (title, not G.I. Taylor estimated tidal dissipation m2/s (1 cgs). abstract). Finally in 1787 Laplace an- of 41 GW in the Irish Sea, using the The subject has the aspect of a zero- nounced that he had discovered the ex- boundary layer formula C D p <u~,aa~> sum game: we know the global tidal dis- planation: planetary perturbations gave W/m 2 with a drag coefficient CD = sipation quite accurately, 2,500 _+ 100 10.18 arcsec/century ~. This explanation 0.0025. This was in fair agreement with GW for M 2, ~3,700 total, but we do not was considered a major triumph of 18th his independent estimate of 60 GW of know where and by what processes dissi- century science. net horizontal flux <p u>t,d,l W/m 2 into pation takes place. The magnitude is In 1853 Adams found that Laplace and out of the boundaries. Jeffreys ex- comparable with the present global elec- had made an error, and that the correct tended Taylor's estimates to a global tric generating capacity, and tiny as corn- answer was but one-half of Laplace's re- value of 2,200 GW. Since 1920, it has sult, requiring some additional phenome- been taken for granted that nearly all of non (such as tidal friction) to account for the dissipation takes place in the turbu- Walter Munk, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the astronomical measurements. This was lent bottom boundary layer (BBL) of UCSD, La Jolla, California, [email protected]: rejected because it destroyed a widely ac- marginal seas. Typical tidal currents are Carl Wunsch, Massachusetts Institute of Technol- claimed theory. Not until G.I. Taylor's of the order of 1 cm/s in the deep sea, ogy, cwunsch @ pond.mit.edu. 1919 estimates of tidal dissipation in the and of 1 knot = 50 cm/s in shallow seas. Irish Sea, followed by Jeffreys' and The cubic dependence on tidal current * We cannot give adequate references in this essay and will have to refer to a forthcoming paper Heiskanen's global extrapolation, was velocity leads to the conclusion that by the authors: "The Moon and Mixing: Abyssal tidal dissipation accepted as an important 99% of the ocean accounts for less than Recipes It.'" factor in orbital dynamics. 1% of the dissipation. 132 OCEANOGRAPHY*VoI. 10, No. 3°1997 Most modern tidal models a priori im- community, who had been accustomed to Kd"p/dz-~ = (w - Kt<')dp]dz, (3) pose a 0.0025 p <U~idal> dissipation, with applying a "rigid-lid" surface boundary the conclusion that substantially all the condition on internal waves. with K' = dK/dz. The authors have esti- dissipation takes place in the BBL. This With the use of the appropriate group mated the energy required to maintain the has some of the earmarks of a self-fulfill- velocities, the total internal tide flux from turbulent diffusion as follows: starting ing prophecy. The most recent estimate Hawaii was estimated at 15 GW. Kantha with a global mean p(z) and its first and by G. Egbert (1997) using T/P altimetry and Tierney (1997) have extended this to second derivatives, as compiled from has led to a somewhat reduced BBL dis- a global estimate of 360 GW of M, mode Levitus atlases, a solution to equation (3) sipation: 1,800 GW for M2 (out of conversion, uncertain by a factor of two. yields an expression for 2,400), but he regards the result as very or(z) = [w(z) - K'(z)]/~c(z) (4) preliminary (see also LeProvost and Pelagic Turbulence Lyard, 1997). Measurements of turbulent dissipation Then using very rough guesses about are difficult because of the small scales the upwelling w(z) from circulation mod- Surface to Internal Tide Conversion (down to 1 cm) at which the turbulent els, equation (4) is solved for K(z). The Most of oceanography deals with fluctuations are irreversibly converted global power required to maintain the haroclinic processes, and therefore the into heat. Shear microstructure measure- abyssal stratification is obtained from possibility of surface tidal dissipation by ments were pioneered by Cox, Osborn, equation (2) using K(z). The result is scattering into internal modes is very at- Gregg, Gargett, and Garrett (for recent -2,000 GW, with very large error limits. tractive. The authors have independently discussions see Kunze and Sanford 1996, Egbert's estimate of 2,600 GW for strived in this direction for most of their Lueck and Mudge 1997) . Dissipation is BBL dissipation leaves only 900 GW for career, but were discouraged by the low proportional to N-~(z) over a wide range other losses (Eq. 1). All numbers are ex- numerical estimates of mode conversion. of open-sea conditions, with a propor- tremely uncertain, and the very assump- Extensive calculation by P.G. Baines tionality constant tOpE of ~10 s m-'/s. This tion of the one-dimensional balance (Eq. yielded only 15 GW of mode conversion value is in agreement with remarkable 3) may not provide a useful basis for dis- along 155,000 km of global coastline. tracer release experiments by Ledwell cussion. But there are reasons why such estimates and his associates. The inferred energy might be severely low (as recognized by dissipation is Baines). Mode conversion is proportional e(Z) = "y IKpENZ W/kg (2) to Q-~ where Q is the volume flux across 3.2 0.5 TW the shelf edge. But most of the flux is where 3' = 0.2 is the mixing efficiency. dM~ 251 y parallel to the ocean boundaries, as a Integration of p e(z) over the global 3.7 TW glance at global tidal charts will show. oceans gives 200 GW, a value similar to 3.5 Off-shore ridges do not so constrain the the surface to internal tide conversion. ! I SURFACE TIDES ] flux and are more favorably situated with This suggests that tidal mode conversion I regard to mode conversion. A second rea- is a factor in maintaining pelagic turbu- 3.5 n~rgmal sea~ M'24~ I r~,lze,, ,eam,,unt~, eh son emphasized by Thorpe and Wunsch lence. A possible mechanism is that the (M,- Igt 26. tM cpm 0.9I is associated with the transverse canyons, discrete line spectrum of internal tides is bar,~t I.m /,,tr,,tr,,p, rills, and gullies in the shelf edge that are converted into the internal wave contin- [ IN'rERN~ neglected in a two-dimensional treatment. uum, which in turn feeds the pelagic tur- Interest in the subject was revived by bulence.