DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights Violatiuns and the Paradox of Democratie Transition a Study of Chile and Argentina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights Violatiuns and the Paradox of Democratie Transition a Study of Chile and Argentina Human Rights Violatiuns and the Paradox of Democratie Transition A Study of Chile and Argentina Elin Skaar R 1994: 5 December 1994 Report Chr. Michelsen Institute Bergen Norway Copyright eg Chr. Michelsen Institute, 1994 CM! Report Series Editor: Elling N. Tjønneland Cover design by Dynamo Bergen Printed by Bergen Print Service AS This series can be ordered from: Chr. Michelsen Institute Fantoftvegen 38 N-5036 Fantoft-Bergen, Norway Fax: + 47 55 57 41 66 Phone: + 47 55 57 40 00 E-mail: cmi(gamadeus.cmi.no Price: NOK 145 ISSN 0805-505X Indexing terms Human Rights Democratization Chile Argentina Contents List of tables and figures IV List of acronyms and abbreviations V Acknow ledgements vll1 Map of Chile and Argentina ix 1. Elitesdemocracy and civil society actors in transitions to 1 1.21.1 Three Introduction central hypotheses 1 2 1.41.3 Authoritarianism, Elite focused democracy, transition and consolidated theory democracy 9 3 1.5 The role of civil society in the process of transition 19 1.6 Defining gross human rights violations 22 1.7 Case selection, method, and sources 26 1.8 The structure of the analysis 30 2. Grossdemocratic human rights violations: Atransition central issue in 32 2.1 Why study gross human rights violations? 32 2.32.2 The2.3.1 geopoliticalThe national context Chileand the national contexts security doctrine36 35 33 2.3.32.3.2 A comparison Argentina of Chile and Argentina 38 41 2.4 A general map of repression: Chile 42 2.4.1 Septemberof the - December military 1973: Institutionalization regime 43 2.4.2 January 1974 - August 1977: the DINA period 47 2.4.3 August 1977 - March 1990: the transition period 49 2.5 2.4.4Gross human rights Exile violations in Argentina 52 54 2.5.1 Detained-disappearances 57 2.5.2 Who were the victims? 59 2.6 Why Argentina was worse 61 3. The form of transition 65 3.1 From theory to reality 65 3.2 Military defeat and transition by collapse in Argentina 65 111 3.2.1 The first stage of transition. Apertura: March 1981 - June 1982 66 3.2.2 The second stage of transition. The failure of negotiation attempts: June 1982 - October 1983 71 3.3 Electoral defeat and negotiated transition in Chile 74 3.3.1 Phase 1. First stage of liberalization: 1980- 1 983 76 3.3.2 Phase 1. Second stage of liberalization: 1983-1988 79 3.3.3 Phase 2. October 1988 - March 1990. Democratization 85 3.4 Comparing the two transitions 88 4. Consolidation? Moral idealism versus political realism 91 4.1 "Truth" ,"justice" , and "reconciliation" 91 4.1.1 Policy measures in the field of human rights 93 4.2 Moralobligations and presidential promises 96 4.3 "Truth": Nunca Más and Informe Rettig 98 4.3.1 Support 100 4.3.2 Aims 101 4.3.3 The fin dings of the reports 102 4.3.4 Reactions to the reports 104 4.3.5 Evaluating the importance of the reports 107 4.4 "Justice": the road from military trials to impunity in Argentina 110 4.5 Why the lack of justice? 118 4.6 The failed quest for truth and justice in Argentina 118 4.6.1 Judicial constraints 119 4.6.2 Constitutional constraints 120 4.6.3 Political constraints 120 4.7 Why no mass-trials in Chile? 121 4.7.1 Judicial constraints 122 4.7.2 Constitutional constraints 127 4.7.3 Political constraints 127 4.8 The outcomes of the Chilean and Argentinean transitions: a paradox 129 5. From transition to consolidation: Does civil society matter too? 135 5.1 Tying together the discussion 135 5.2 Introducing new actors 136 5.3 The human rights organizations in Chile: VicarÍa paves the way 139 iv 5.4 TheMothers human rights organizations take inthe Argentina: lead The 142 5.5 Comparing and contrasting the NGOs and movements 145 5.6 Theto role of humandemocracy rights organizations in transitions 147 5.7 Accounting5.7.1 for theInformation paradox of democratic consolidation 155 154 5.7.2 Unit y versus disunity 157 5.8 The Catholic Church and power constellations 159 5.8.1 The pro-human rights Catholic Church in Chile 161 5.8.2 The pro-military Catholic Church in Argentina 163 5.9 Human rights organizations and political parties 166 5.9.1 Connections at the individuallevel 167 5.9.2 The structurallevel 170 5.10 Assessing the human rights movements in 5.1Chile 1 Concluding and Argentina remarks 172175 BibliographyAppendices 178182 Tables 1: Thein pyramid Chile of repression: (1973-1989) gross human rights violations 42 2: Deaths and detained-disappearances in Chile (1973-1990) 52 3: Degree of "success" regarding human rights policy 132 4: HumanArgentina rights organizations (1976- in Chile (1976-1990) 1983) and 146 Figures 1: Modes of transition: the property space 15 2: VictimsArgentina of death and detained-disappearance according in toChile age and 60 3: Repression in Chile (1973-1990) and Argentina (1976-1983) 61 v List of acronyms and abbreviations Argentina AAA Alianza Anticomunista Argentina: Argentine Anti- Communist Alliance APDH Asamblea Permanente por los Dereehos Humanos: Permanent Assembly on Human Rights CELS Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales: Center for Legal and Social Studies CGT Confederación General del Trabajo: General Confederation of Labour CONADEP Comisión Nacional Sobre la Desaparición de Personas: National Commission on Disappeared Persons ERP Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo: People' s Revolutionary Army ESMA Escuela de Mecánica de la Armada: Navy Mechanics School FAP Fuerzas Armadas Peronistas: Peronist Armed Forces FAR Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias: Revolutionary Armed Forces FDDRPG Familiares de Desaparecidos y Detenidos por Razones Políticas y Gremiales: Association of Families of Persons Disappeared and Detained for Political and Trade Union Activity HRO Human rights organization IMF International Monetary Fund MAS Movimiento al Socialismo: Movement to Socialism MEDH Movimiento Ecuménico por los Dereehos Humanos: Ecumenical Movement for Human Rights MID Movimiento de Integración y Desarrollo: Movement for Integration and Development NGO Non-governmental organization PI Partido Intransigente: Intransigent Party PJ Partido Justicialista: Justicialist Party PRT Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores: W orkers' Revolutionary Party VI PS Partido Socialista: Socialist Party SCAF Consejo Supremo de las Fuerzas Armadas: Supreme Council of the Armed Forces SERPAJ Servicio Paz y Justicia para América Latina: Service for Peace and Justice in Latin America UCD Unión del Centro Democrático: Democratic Center Union UCR Unión Cívico Radical: Radical Civic Union UCRI Unión Cívico Radical Intransigente: Intransigent Radical Civic Union UCRP Unión Cívica Radical del Pueblo: People' s Radical Civic Union UNDHR United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Chile AD Alianza Democrática: Democratic Alliance ADENA Acuerdo Democrático Nacional: National Accord for the Transition to Democracy AFAREL Agrupación de Familiares de Relegados y Ex-Relegados: Association of Families of Displaced and former Displaced Persons AFDD Agrupación de Familiares de Detenidos Desaparecidos: Association of Families of Detained-Disappeared Persons AFEP Agrupación de Familiares de Ejecutados Políticos: Association of Families of Executed Political Activists AFPP Agrupación de Familiares de Presos Políticos: Association of Families of Political Prisoners CCDH Comisión Chilena de Dereehos Humanos: Chilean Commission on Human Rights CLAMOR Comité de Defensa de Dereehos Humanos en el Conq Sur: Commttee on the Defense of Human Rights in the Southern Cone CNI Central Nacional de Informaciones: National Information Center CNCT Comisión Nacional contra la Tortura: National Commission on Torture CODEJU Comisión Nacional Pro Dereehos Juveniles: National Commission on the Protection of the Rights of Y oung Persons Vll CODEPU Comité de Defensa de los Dereehos del Pueblo: Commttee on the Defense of the Rights of the People COPACHI Comité de Cooperación para la Paz en Chile: Committee on Cooperation for Peace in Chile CPRE Comité Pro Retorno de Exiliados: Commttee on the Return of Exiled Persons DINA Dirección Nacional de Informaciones: National Intelligence Directorate F ASIC Fundación de Ayuda Social de las Iglesias Cristianas: Christian Churches' Social Assistance Foundation FPMR Frente Patriótico Manuel Rodríguez: Manuel Rodríguez Patriotic Front IC Izquierda Cristiana: Christian Left MAPU Movimiento de Acción Popular Unitaria: Movement for Unified Popular Action MDP Movimiento Democrático Popular: Popular Democratic Movement MIR Movimiento de /zquierda Revolutionario: Movement of the Revolutionary Left MCTSA Movimiento contra la Tortura "Sebastián Acevedo": Movement Against Torture "Sebastián Acevedo" PC Partido Communista: Communist Party PDC Partido Democracia Cristiana: Christian Democratic Party PDHAHC Programa Dereehos Humanos de la Academía de Humanismo Cristiano: Human Rights Programme of the Academy of Humanism and Christianity PDR Partido de la Democracia Radical: Radical Democratic Party PIDEE Protección a la Infancia Dañada por los Estados de Emergencia: Protection of Children Damaged under States of Emergency PPD Partido por la Democracia: Party for Democracy PR Partido Radical: Radical Party PS Partido Socialista: Socialist Party PSD Partido Social Demócrata: Social Democratic Party RN Partido de Renovación Nacional: National Renovation Party SERPAJ Servicio de Paz y Justicia: Service for Peace and Justice UDI Unión Demócrata Independiente: Independent Democratic Union UP Unidad Popular: Popular Unit y Coalition Vll1 Acknowledgements This study is a slightly revised version of my Cand. Polit. thesis, Human Rights Violations and the Paradox of Democratie Transition - a Study of Chile and Argentina, submitted to the Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, May 1994. The revision has been facilitated with funding from the Chr. Michelsen Institute, which also provided me with excellent working conditions during the writing stage of my thesis. First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to Tor Skålnes, who guided me throughout the process of writing the original study, spurred my thoughts in new directions, and always challenged me another step further. Thanks are due to Einar Berntzen at the University of Bergen for long, stimulating discussions and useful comments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EXPLAINING POPULIST PARTY ADAPTATION in LATIN AMERICA Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela
    ARTICLE 10.1177/0010414003256112COMPARATIVEBurgess, Levitsky POLITICAL / POPULIST STUDIES PARTY LATIN / October AMERICA 2003 EXPLAINING POPULIST PARTY ADAPTATION IN LATIN AMERICA Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela KATRINA BURGESS Syracuse University STEVEN LEVITSKY Harvard University This article uses a two-level framework to explain variation in Latin American populist parties’ responses to the neoliberal challenge of the 1980s and 1990s. First, it examines the incentives for adaptation, focusing on the electoral and economic environments in which parties operated. Sec- ond, it examines parties’organizational capacity to adapt, focusing on leadership renovation and the accountability of office-holding leaders to unions and party authorities. This framework is applied to four cases: the Argentine Justicialista Party (PJ), the Mexican Institutional Revolu- tionary Party (PRI), the Peruvian APRA party, and Venezuelan Democratic Action (AD). In Argentina, the combination of strong incentives and substantial adaptive capacity resulted in radical programmatic change and electoral success. In Mexico, where the PRI had high adaptive capacity but faced somewhat weaker external incentives, programmatic change was slower but nevertheless substantial, and the party survived as a major political force. In Peru, where APRA had some capacity but little incentive to adapt, and in Venezuela, where AD had neither a strong incentive nor the capacity to adapt, populist parties achieved little programmatic change and suf- fered steep electoral decline. Keywords: Argentina; Mexico; Peru; Venezuela; populist parties; party change AUTHORS’NOTE: An earlier draft of this article was delivered at the 2001 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association in Washington, DC, September 6-8, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Ma-Celo Cavarozzi Paper Prepared for the Meeting on "Political Parties and Redemocratization in in the World Congress of T
    PERMNS AND PADICALISO: ARt ,,A' S TRANSrTIONS lT PESPECIVE Ma-celo Cavarozzi CEDES, Buenos Aires JulY1985 Paper prepared for the meeting on "Political Parties and Redemocratization in the Southern Cone" sponsored by the Latin American Program of The Wilson Center and the World Peace Foundation. Washington, D.C., September 9-12, 1985. A preliminary version was presented in the World Congress of the International Political Science Association (Paris, 15-20 July, 1985) at the Special Session on "Crisis and resurrection of political parties in democratization processes." Do not quote. 1 InrR0DLL'ICN Since 1955, the most visible feature of the Argentine political system has been a higher level of instability. Not only did military coups become more frequent, but the installation of each new regime was irnvariably followed by a repetition of the same cycle: the failure to develop an alternative political foraula, signs of the e gence of political, fragility, and the final collapse. 1bre significantly, beneath the tumultuous surface of political events, the key achanisms of the 1945-55 state were disrmntled without being replaced by alternative arrangements. Those mechanisms had been based upon the partial institutionalization of Perdn's own personal leadership. During those years, Perdn had not only been the head of government, he had also played two other key roles by channeling the political representation of the popular masses through himself and by pronting the subordination of the armed forces to the political institutions. Despite the ultimate failure to create alternative political mechanisms to replace those of the Peronist state, the course of post-1955 events was shaped by the unfolding of the successive projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999*
    FROM LABOR POLITICS TO MACHINE POLITICS: The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999* Steven Levitsky Harvard University Abstract: The Argentine (Peronist) Justicialista Party (PJ)** underwent a far- reaching coalitional transformation during the 1980s and 1990s. Party reformers dismantled Peronism’s traditional mechanisms of labor participation, and clientelist networks replaced unions as the primary linkage to the working and lower classes. By the early 1990s, the PJ had transformed from a labor-dominated party into a machine party in which unions were relatively marginal actors. This process of de-unionization was critical to the PJ’s electoral and policy success during the presidency of Carlos Menem (1989–99). The erosion of union influ- ence facilitated efforts to attract middle-class votes and eliminated a key source of internal opposition to the government’s economic reforms. At the same time, the consolidation of clientelist networks helped the PJ maintain its traditional work- ing- and lower-class base in a context of economic crisis and neoliberal reform. This article argues that Peronism’s radical de-unionization was facilitated by the weakly institutionalized nature of its traditional party-union linkage. Although unions dominated the PJ in the early 1980s, the rules of the game governing their participation were always informal, fluid, and contested, leaving them vulner- able to internal changes in the distribution of power. Such a change occurred during the 1980s, when office-holding politicians used patronage resources to challenge labor’s privileged position in the party. When these politicians gained control of the party in 1987, Peronism’s weakly institutionalized mechanisms of union participation collapsed, paving the way for the consolidation of machine politics—and a steep decline in union influence—during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • PERONISM and ANTI-PERONISM: SOCIAL-CULTURAL BASES of POLITICAL IDENTITY in ARGENTINA PIERRE OSTIGUY University of California
    PERONISM AND ANTI-PERONISM: SOCIAL-CULTURAL BASES OF POLITICAL IDENTITY IN ARGENTINA PIERRE OSTIGUY University of California at Berkeley Department of Political Science 210 Barrows Hall Berkeley, CA 94720 [email protected] Paper presented at the LASA meeting, in Guadalajara, Mexico, on April 18, 1997 This paper is about political identity and the related issue of types of political appeals in the public arena. It thus deals with a central aspect of political behavior, regarding both voters' preferences and identification, and politicians' electoral strategies. Based on the case of Argentina, it shows the at times unsuspected but unmistakable impact of class-cultural, and more precisely, social-cultural differences on political identity and electoral behavior. Arguing that certain political identities are social-culturally based, this paper introduces a non-ideological, but socio-politically significant, axis of political polarization. As observed in the case of Peronism and anti-Peronism in Argentina, social stratification, particularly along an often- used compound, in surveys, of socio-economic status and education,1 is tightly associated with political behavior, but not so much in Left-Right political terms or even in issue terms (e.g. socio- economic platforms or policies), but rather in social-cultural terms, as seen through the modes and type of political appeals, and figuring centrally in certain already constituted political identities. Forms of political appeals may be mapped in terms of a two-dimensional political space, defined by the intersection of this social-cultural axis with the traditional Left-to-Right spectrum. Also, since already constituted political identities have their origins in the successful "hailing"2 of pluri-facetted people and groups, such a bi-dimensional space also maps political identities.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Levitsky Pp. 152-166.Pmd
    ARGENTINA WEATHERS THE STORM Steven Levitsky and María Victoria Murillo Steven Levitsky is assistant professor of government at Harvard Uni- versity. He is author of Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective (2003) and is currently writing a book on the emergence and dynamics of competi- tive authoritarian regimes in the post–Cold War era. María Victoria Murillo is associate professor of political science and international affairs at Columbia University. She is the author of Labor Unions, Par- tisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America (2001). The events of December 2001 seemed to transform Argentina’s interna- tional status from poster child to basket case. Throughout the 1990s, Argentina had been widely hailed as a case of successful market reform under democratic government. The radical economic transformation un- dertaken by the government of Carlos Saúl Menem had ended hyperinflation and restored economic growth, while the country enjoyed an unprecedented degree of democratic stability. Elections were free; civil liberties were broadly protected; and the armed forces, which had toppled six civilian governments since 1930, largely disappeared from the political scene. Yet in late 2001, Argentina suffered an extraordinary economic and political meltdown. A prolonged recession and a severe financial crisis culminated in a debt default, a chaotic devaluation, and a descent into the deepest depression in Argentine history. A massive wave of riots and protests triggered a string of presidential resignations, plunging the country into a profound crisis. For several months, Argen- tina teetered on the brink of anarchy. Widespread hostility toward the political elite raised the specter of a Peru- or Venezuela-style party- system collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • South America List of Political Parties
    Manifesto Project Dataset: South America List of Political Parties [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2020b from December 23, 2020 Manifesto Project Dataset: South America - List of Political Parties Version 2020b 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The Manifesto Data Collection: South America covers parliamentary and presidential elections in South America. The following list documents all the parties, candidates and elections contained in the dataset. The list includes the name of the party or (candidate) alliance in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation, the name of the presidential candidate (if this applies) as well as the corresponding party identification number. In the case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties it comprises. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list. If the composition of an alliance has changed between elections this change is reported as well. If parliamentary and presidential elections occur at roughly the same time (not necessarily on the same date but within a time frame of one or two months) parties and candidates usually run on the same manifesto. In these cases we report the party/alliance that backed a candidate and the candidate’s name. The same information is provided for presidential elections. If a parliamentary election occurred independently from a presidential election we only report parties and alliances but no candidates. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party has split from another party or a number of parties has merged and indicates the name (and the party id if it exists) of this split or merger parties.
    [Show full text]
  • South America List of Political Parties
    Manifesto Project Dataset: South America List of Political Parties [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2019b from December 17, 2019 Manifesto Project Dataset: South America - List of Political Parties Version 2019b 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The Manifesto Data Collection: South America covers parliamentary and presidential elections in South America. The following list documents all the parties, candidates and elections contained in the dataset. The list includes the name of the party or (candidate) alliance in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation, the name of the presidential candidate (if this applies) as well as the corresponding party identification number. In the case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties it comprises. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list. If the composition of an alliance has changed between elections this change is reported as well. If parliamentary and presidential elections occur at roughly the same time (not necessarily on the same date but within a time frame of one or two months) parties and candidates usually run on the same manifesto. In these cases we report the party/alliance that backed a candidate and the candidate’s name. The same information is provided for presidential elections. If a parliamentary election occurred independently from a presidential election we only report parties and alliances but no candidates. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party has split from another party or a number of parties has merged and indicates the name (and the party id if it exists) of this split or merger parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil
    This page intentionally left blank Legislative Politics in Latin America This theoretically inspired study explores legislative politics in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Instead of beginning with an assumption that these legislatures are either rubber stamps or obstructionist bodies, the chapters pro- vide new data and a fresh analytical approach to describe and explain the role of these representative bodies in these consolidating democracies. For each country the book provides three chapters dedicated, in turn, to executive– legislative relations, the legislatures’ organizational structure, and the policy process. The analytical focus of each section, however , remains the same: the role of institutional factors (including the allocation of policy-making author- ity between the executive and legislative branches of government; the number of relevant parties in the legislature; and the structure of electoral incentives) in shaping the patterns of legislative behavior. Scott Morgenstern is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Duke University. Professor Morgenstern has held a visiting pro- fessor position at CIDE (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas) in Mexico and served as a visiting researcher at the Instituto de Cienica Politica, Uruguay. Benito Nacif is Research Professor at CIDE (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas) in Mexico. Professor Nacif’s academic distinctions include the British Foreign Office and Commonwealth Scholarship (1990–1992). Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
    [Show full text]
  • New Latin American Left : Utopia Reborn
    Barrett 00 Prelims.qxd 31/07/2008 14:41 Page i THE NEW LATIN AMERICAN LEFT Barrett 00 Prelims.qxd 31/07/2008 14:41 Page ii Transnational Institute Founded in 1974, the Transnational Institute (TNI) is an international network of activist-scholars committed to critical analyses of the global problems of today and tomorrow, with a view to providing intellectual support to those movements concerned to steer the world in a democratic, equitable and environmentally sustainable direction. In the spirit of public scholarship, and aligned to no political party, TNI seeks to create and promote international co-operation in analysing and finding possible solu- tions to such global problems as militarism and conflict, poverty and marginalisation, social injustice and environmental degradation. Email: [email protected] Website: www.tni.org Telephone + 31 20 662 66 08 Fax + 31 20 675 71 76 De Wittenstraat 25 1052 AK Amsterdam The Netherlands Barrett 00 Prelims.qxd 31/07/2008 14:41 Page iii The New Latin American Left Utopia Reborn Edited by Patrick Barrett, Daniel Chavez and César Rodríguez-Garavito Barrett 00 Prelims.qxd 31/07/2008 14:41 Page iv First published 2008 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA www.plutobooks.com Copyright © Patrick Barrett, Daniel Chavez and César Rodríguez-Garavito 2008 The right of the individual contributors to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7453 2639 9 Hardback ISBN 978 0 7453 2677 1 Paperback Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data applied for This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Art and Political Propaganda: the Popular Culture of Argentine Protest, 1986
    79 [bero-Americana, Nordic Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. XVIII: 2, 1988 - pp. 79-100 PUBLIC ART AND POLITICAL PROPAGANDA: THE POPULAR CULTURE OF ARGENTINE PROTEST, 1986. LYMAN CHAFFEE* I Communication is a basic human need. Societies evolve communication systems which allows governments, organizations and individuals to present their views, de­ mands, needs and ideas. This enables the various societal entities to lobby for their interests concerning the realization of their social, economic, political and cultural goals. The media and technology for this communication process, though, have changed over time, diversifying the channels available for the dissemination of ideas and culture. The latest development in the explosion of communication is the sophisticated electronic media which many classify as revolutionary. In this "revolutionary" pro- * Professor of Political Science, California State University, Carson, California. -·"-"1, 80 cess, technology is God, mass culture the result. This presupposes that the mass cul­ ture of communication is imposed from above by experts and technicans hired by monied interests. Communication, however, is multifaceted. If we concentrate pri­ marily upon the electronic dimension of communication, we lose perspective on the variety, diversity and simplicity of "less" sophisticated systems of expression such as the mass culture of street communication graffiti, wall painting, murals and pos­ ters. Their importance to the communication infrastructure within certain political systems is significant but often ignored or downgraded in importance by analysts. Street media such as graffiti and wall painting create a paradox to the develop­ ment of the contemporary electroni9 communication revolution for there is a renew­ ed interest by some groups and organizations in these "old" forms of communica­ tion, or what this paper calls alternative street media.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 170 PERONISM and RADICALISM
    Number 170 PERONISM AND RADICALISM: ARGENTINA' S TRANSITION IN PERSPECTIVE Marcelo Cavarozzi CEDES, Buenos Aires Paper prepared for the conference "Political Parties and the Return to Democracy in the Southern Cone," sponsored by the Latin American Program of The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C . and the World Peace Foundation, Boston, 9-12 September 1985. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Special Session on "Crisis and Resurrection of Political Parties in Demo cratization Processes," sponsored by The World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Paris, 15-20 July 1985. copyright © 1986 by Marcelo Cavarozzi This essay is one of a series of Working Papers of the Latin American Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The series includes papers by Program Fellows, Guest Scholars, interns, staff and Academic Council, as well as work from Program seminars, workshops, colloquia, and conferences. The series aims to extend the Program's discussions to a wider community throughout the Americas, and to help authors obtain timely criticism of work in progress. Support to make distribution possible has been provided by the Inter-American Development Bank and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Editor: Louis W. Goodman; Assistant to the Editor: Eric L. Palladini, Jr. Single copies of Working Papers may be obtained without charge by writing to: Latin American Program, Working Papers The Wilson Center Smithsonian Institution Building
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Black Box: Recent Studies of Latin American Party Organizations Steven Levitsky
    92 Studies in Comparative International Development / Summer 2001 Book Review Essay Inside the Black Box: Recent Studies of Latin American Party Organizations Steven Levitsky Kathleen Bruhn, Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997). Michael Coppedge, Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994). Scott P. Mainwaring, Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999). James W. McGuire, Peronism Without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997). Kenneth M. Roberts, Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998). atin American party organizations have received remarkably little schol- Larly attention. Although this is hardly a new problem (see Blanksten 1960: 479; Martz 1964: 509; Kaufman 1977: 109), it is particularly surprising in the contemporary period. Not only has the demise of authoritarianism in the re- gion increased the number and importance of parties, but the intellectual trend away from marxism to more political and institutional approaches has created a more favorable scholarly environment as well. Yet while a substantial amount of research has been done on non-party organizations such as neighborhood associations, NGOs, “issue networks,” and identity-based social movements,1 and while the recent “institutionalist” wave has generated important studies of Latin American electoral laws, legislatures, and executive-legislative relations,2 studies of party organizations remain conspicuously absent.3 One possible explanation for this paucity of research is that party organiza- tions are simply less important in Latin America than in the advanced industri- alized countries.
    [Show full text]