DOCSLIB.ORG

For Sale: 72,845 Sf Warehouse Kevin S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Sale: 72,845 Sf Warehouse Kevin S PORT OF UMATILLA EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTED BY FOR SALE: 72,845 SF WAREHOUSE KEVIN S. MURPHY First Vice President 503.221.2276 COLO LOGISTICS | 30900 LAUNCH LANE | UMATILLA, OR 97882 [email protected] KIDDER.COM PROPERTY SUMMARY PRICE: $7,200,000 LOCATION NEW CONSTRUCTION WAREHOUSE HIGHLIGHTS Located at the Port of Umatilla the The state-of-the-art facility was built DISTRIBUTION/FOOD 72,845 SF shell Colo Logistics property provides the in 2007 with the large addition in PROCESSING/MANUFACTURING region's most superior location with 2009. 2,800 SF 2-story office support for barge, rail and over-the- In addition to being an ideal road logistics. distribution facility, the larger 2007/09 construction QUALITY warehouse was built with a metal Every dock and rail have newer dock roof deck and engineered to Concrete tilt SECURE seals and levelers. The facility has support roof mounted cooling The property is completely fenced been expertly maintained and has towers. The facility also includes 11 docks and secure providing 24-Hour no known deferred maintenance 2,000 amps of power making it ideal 1 drive-in secure access. issues. for food processing. 4 rail door Dock seals Dock levelers 24’ clear height Metal roof deck Engineered roof system 2,000 amps 3 phase power SITE HIGHLIGHTS 8.16 acres (355,450 SF) Completely paved Security fencing and gates Truck scale 2-acre paved trailer parking/yard BNSF/UP rail siding Located at the Port of Umatilla 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 2 SITE PLAN BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 SITE FEATURES 20,750 SF Shell 52,095 SF Shell Truck Scale 2,800 SF Office (2 story) 7 Docks BNSF / UP Rail Siding 4 Docks 1 Rail Door Trailer Storage 3 Rail Doors 24' Clear Height Fully Fenced and Secured 24' Clear Height 2,000 Amps 3 Phase Power 2 Acre Paved Yard Metal Roof Deck BLDG 2 (52,095 SF) ROXBURY ROAD BLDG 1 (20,750 SF) TRUCK SCALE YARD RAIL PORT OF UMATILLA 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 3 HERMISTON AND UMATILLA Hermiston and Umatilla are a vibrant and growing city of 18,000 residents located at the crossroads of the Pacific Northwest. Located near the intersection of Interstate 84 and Interstate 82, just minutes from a Columbia River port and the Washington state line, Hermiston and Umatilla are capitalizing on its strategic location as a transportation center and gateway to Oregon’s favorable sales-tax climate. Hermiston and Umatilla are positioned at the center of all of the major Northwest markets is supplemented by its outstanding transportation infrastructure. Seattle, Portland, Spokane, and Boise are all within 3-4 hours of Hermiston thanks to the city’s location at the intersection of Interstates 84 & 82. These major east-west and north-south freeways also allow for access to markets in Montana, Utah, California, and British Columbia. Hermiston and Umatilla are also home to the Union Pacific Railroad switching facility and is just 8 miles from a refrigerator cargo dock for transportation on the Columbia River transportation system. A redundant fiber optic communications system with connectivity to both Portland, Oregon and Seattle, Washington telecommunications hubs allows Hermiston businesses to harness the full power of web-based applications with confidence. 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 4 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW CITY OF UMATILLA PORT TRADE CITY OF HERMISTON Grain 6,996 7,132 Container Terminals 22,339 23,494 Bulk and Breakbulk Terminals POPULATION POPULATION Fuel / Liquid Terminals POPULATION POPULATION (2010) (2019) (2010) (2019) PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 12 municipalities Handling cargoes of grain, petroleum, project cargo, and 8,325 $32,969 containers 23,762 $55,278 Served by two interstate highways, a rail siting, and a modern full-service maritime facility POPULATION HH INCOME AVERAGE POPULATION HH INCOME AVERAGE (2022) (2019) An abundance of industrial properties thorough out the port (2022) (2019) district held by private and public entities MCNARY DAM PORT OF UMATILLA SUBJECT LAUNCH LN PROPERTY BRUCE ST BUD DRAPER RD RIVERDALE AVE ROXBURY RD 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 5 LOCATION OVERVIEW LEGEND Interstate Highway State Highway Railroad To Seattle, Spokane and Tri-Cities SUBJECT PROPERTY Columbia River Port of Umatilla Hermiston HERMISTON NEARBY DESTINATIONS Pendleton Commercial Airport 40 miles Pasco Commercial Airport 30 miles Portland International Airport 185 miles To Portland Port of Umatilla Refrigerated River Port 1 miles Port of Morrow Cargo River Port 25 miles Interstate 82 2 miles Interstate 84 10 miles DRIVE TIMES & DISTANCES Seattle 240 miles 4.0 hours Spokane 166 miles 2.6 hours To Boise Portland 190 miles 3.0 hours Boise 265 miles 4.0 hours Tri-Cities 30 miles 0.5 hours 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 6 UNITED GRAIN CORP MCNARY DAM PLYMOUTH TWO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL TIDEWAY INSTITUTION TERMINAL CO PORT OF UMATILLA JM EAGLE CO SUBJECT COLUMBIA RIVER PROPERTY MCNARY UMATILLA 6TH ST HANGERMAN INC MCNARY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLARA BROWNELL MIDDLE SCHOOL POWER CITY 118822 CHARLESTOWN 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 7 RICHLAND 182 PASCO KENNEWICK SUBJECT PROPERTY UMATILLA 30900 LAUNCH LANE OFFERING MEMORANDUM KIDDER MATHEWS 8 EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTED BY KEVIN S. MURPHY First Vice President 503.221.2276 [email protected] KIDDER.COM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Area Fire Weather Annual Operating Plan
    Williams Flats Fire: August 7, 2019 Photo: Inciweb 2021 Northwest Area Fire Weather Annual Operating Plan 1 This page intentionally left blank 2 3 This page intentionally left blank 4 Table of Contents Agency Signatures/Effective Dates of the AOP ......................................................................................3 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................6 NWS Services and Responsibilities.........................................................................................................8 Wildland Fire Agency Services and Responsibilities ........................................................................... 14 Joint Responsibilities ...........................................................................................................................15 NWCC Predictive Services ...................................................................................................................17 Boise .................................................................................................................................................. 25 Medford...............................................................................................................................................30 Pendleton ........................................................................................................................................... 41 Portland...............................................................................................................................................53
    [Show full text]
  • I-90: Twin Falls (North Bend Vicinity) to I-82 Jct (Ellensburg) Corridor
    Corridor Sketch Summary Printed at: 3:54 PM 3/29/2018 WSDOT's Corridor Sketch Initiative is a collaborative planning process with agency partners to identify performance gaps and select high-level strategies to address them on the 304 corridors statewide. This Corridor Sketch Summary acts as an executive summary for one corridor. Please review the User Guide for Corridor Sketch Summaries prior to using information on this corridor: I-90: Twin Falls (North Bend Vicinity) to I-82 Jct (Ellensburg) This 74-mile long northwest-southeast corridor is located in King and Kittitas counties and runs between Twin Falls, just east of North Bend, and the Interstate 82 junction in the city of Ellensburg. The corridor includes a five-mile segment of US Route 97 on the eastern end of the corridor that runs concurrently with I-90. In the upper elevations of western Kittitas County, I-90 passes near Keechelus, Kachess, and Cle Elum lakes, three large reservoirs that provide irrigation water to the Kittitas and Yakima valleys. I-90 follows the Yakima River valley between the Keechelus Lake in the Snoqualmie Pass area and the city of Ellensburg. The corridor is primarily rural with some urban areas in the cities of Cle Elum and Ellensburg. The corridor travels over Snoqualmie Pass through the Cascade Mountains. On the western end of the corridor, the route is on a steep grade through heavily wooded national forest lands before reaching Snoqualmie Pass and Kittitas County. On the eastern section of the corridor, the route descends into grasslands and irrigated fields in the lower Kittitas Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6-1 3.6 Traffic and Circulation Construction of the Wanapa Energy
    3.6 Traffic and Circulation Construction of the Wanapa Energy Center would most likely affect traffic flow on McNary Beach Access Road, U.S. Highway 730, and U.S. Highway 395/State Route 32. Up to 600 workers would travel to the facility site during construction, 100 to the natural gas supply/wastewater discharge pipeline routes, and 120 to the transmission line route. During operation, 30 workers would work at the facility. 3.6.1 Affected Environment Major highways accessing the project study area include U.S. Highway 730 (i.e., U.S. Highway 730; the Columbia River Highway), U.S. Highway 395/State Route (SR) 32 (i.e., SR 32; the Umatilla-Stanfield Highway), Interstate 82 (I-82), and State Route 207 (i.e., the Hermiston Highway). U.S. Highway 730 is a 2-lane west-east highway that generally runs along the south side of the Columbia River. U.S. Highway 395/SR 32 is a 2-lane northwest-southeast highway that runs from U.S. Highway 730 in the north; through Umatilla, Hermiston, and Stanfield; and then to I-84/U.S. 30 in the south. I-82 is a 4-lane highway running north-south from the Tri-Cities in Washington until it intersects with I-84/U.S. 30. SR 207 is a 2-lane highway that runs southwest- northeast, starting at I-82 in the west, through Hermiston, and then intersecting with U.S. Highway 730 in the east. Table 3.6-1 summarizes the average daily traffic (ADT) and accident counts by milepost and location for these major roadways for 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes
    Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes Submitted By: Christopher J. Espiritu A Thesis Quality Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters of Science in Transportation Management Mineta Transportation Institute San Jose State University June 2013 Acknowledgements My greatest appreciation goes to Dr. Peter Haas and Rod Diridon for guiding me through this process. A special thank you goes to Dr. Nick Compin and Dr. Amelia Regan for their guidance and support of this project. My appreciation also goes to the representatives of the Caltrans Traffic Data Branch, Georgia DOT, Virginia DOT, Washington DOT, Oregon DOT, and NJ DOT; this project would not be possible without your great work. A special thank you also goes to Viviann Ferea for all the help and support over the last couple of years. This is dedicated to my loving family. To my sister (Charity) and my brother‐in‐law (Dave), for their unfailing support and encouragement. To my beloved Susan, for her support and patience. And finally, this is dedicated to my mother (Deborah), who I have dearly missed over the last year and a half since starting this program. Page 2 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 8 RESEARCH FOCUS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Omatilla County Transportation System Plan
    Omatilla County Transportation System Plan April 20Q2 Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. and Umatilla County Staff in cooperation with ODOT April 2002 Umatilla County Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 :INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1 VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS .....................................................................................................1-1 PLANNING AREA ........................................................................................................................................1-1 PLANNING PROCESS ...............................................................................................................................1-2 Community Involvement ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................................1-3 Review and Inventory of Existing Plans, Policies, and Public Facilities ...................................................1-3 Future Transportation System Demands .....................................................................................................1-4 Transportation System Potential Improvements .........................................................................................1-4 Transportation System Plan ......................................................................................................................1-4
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 50Th Anniversary: the Story of Oregon's Interstates
    Interstate 50th Anniversary The Story of Oregon’s Interstates Table of Contents 1) Introduction ....................................................................................................................2 2) Oregon’s road-building legacy...................................................................................... 2 3) The interstate comes to Oregon .................................................................................. 5 i) Segments of interest on I-5............................................................................. 5 ii) Focus moves to I-80N (today’s I-84) ............................................................ 6 iii) Notable segments on I-84............................................................................... 6 iv) Oregon’s minor major interstate: I-82........................................................... 7 v) Oregon’s other interstates ............................................................................... 8 vi) Oregon’s interstate segments that weren’t.................................................... 10 4) Interstate finalization chart ........................................................................................... 12 5) Interstate-related issues in Oregon .............................................................................. 12 6) Highway beautification.................................................................................................. 14 7) What’s next?....................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Wrong-Way Driving Special Investigative Report
    Wrong-Way Driving Special Investigation Report NTSB/SIR-12/01 National PB2012-917003 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/SIR-12/01 PB2012-917003 Notation 8453 Adopted December 11, 2012 Highway Special Investigation Report Wrong-Way Driving National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, SW Washington, DC 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2012. Wrong-Way Driving. Highway Special Investigation Report NTSB/SIR-12/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This special investigation report looks at one of the most serious types of highway accidents—collisions involving vehicles traveling the wrong way on high-speed divided highways. The goal of this investigative project is to identify relevant safety recommendations to prevent wrong-way collisions on such highways and access ramps. The investigations included in the report take a focused view of the driver and highway issues affecting wrong-way collisions. The report addresses the following safety issues concerning wrong-way driving: driver impairment, primarily from alcohol use, with consideration of older driver issues and possible drug involvement; the need to establish, through traffic control devices and highway design, distinctly different views for motorists approaching entrance and exit ramps; monitoring and intervention programs for wrong-way collisions; and in-vehicle driver support systems. The report contains safety recommendations issued to the Federal Highway Administration; the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; the states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico; the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.; the International Association of Chiefs of Police; the National Sheriffs’ Association; SAE International; the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers; Global Automakers; and the Consumer Electronics Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2021 Summer Three Priorities Lead the Way: Equity, Modern Transportation System and and System Transportation Modern Equity, Way: the Lead Priorities Three
    /2021 5 REV 734-2812 No. Form Cover photo: Astoria-Megler brdige inspection. Photo by Greg Westergaard. Greg Westergaard. photo: Astoria-Megler inspection.Photo brdige by Cover Questions: 1-877-336-6368 (EEO-ODOT) or statewide relay, 711. relay, statewide or (EEO-ODOT) 1-877-336-6368 Questions: to our programs, services, activities, hiring, and employment practices. practices. employment and hiring, activities, services, programs, our to does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admission or access access or admission in disability of basis the on discriminate not does T T ODO request. upon available formats Alternative disabilities. with to a diverse workforce. Accommodations will be provided to persons persons to provided be will Accommodations workforce. diverse a to ODOT is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer committed committed employer action affirmative opportunity, equal an is ODOT and let us know what you think: [email protected]. think: you what know us let and See the plan on our website, www.oregon.gov/odot/Pages/SAP.aspx www.oregon.gov/odot/Pages/SAP.aspx website, our on plan the See we’ve identified in the Strategic Action Plan. Plan. Action Strategic the in identified we’ve with the communities we serve, and timely completion of the outcomes outcomes the of completion timely and serve, we communities the with securing adequate federal, state and local funding, effective partnering partnering effective funding, local and state federal, adequate securing environment. The transformation we desire can only be achieved by by achieved be only can desire we transformation The environment. city or county roads.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Fi HIGH WAY CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
    3Fi Washington State Department of Transportation f; Library PUGET Ms'vsviiie SOUND lake Stevens AREA EVERETT Pott GamDIe HIGH WAY F dmOM! ilRSlon Mounllake—— O leirace >4(6' CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN IBoltieli SEATTLE 0tON taslgate F all f.itv -'ORt i>R(;hARD issaciuan White Centei nenton fl Ufien I Normandy o Park I 19^ Oes Moines\ Purdy nedondojo NOVEMBER 1969 Fedeiat O Way Black Diamond Arlelta TACOMA ^ MiKon I Enumclaw ruyallup I (si» Fruitland \A/ashingt,on State Highway Commission Bonney lake Corner Parkland Buckley George D. Zahn Chairman PUGET SOUND AREA Baker Ferguson SR 526. Muki lteo Blvd. Bridge construction. Watch for flagmen. Possible minor delays and detours. Harold Walsh 2. SR 526. South of Everett. Grading, paving and bridges. Flagmen, detours. Robert L. MIkalson M i nor de1 ay5. John N. Rupp 3. SR 526. Broadway Interchange construction. AO mph. Flagmen and equipment. Possible minor delays. Short detours. One lane each way during working hours. A. SR 99 3nd 1-90. Resurfacing in progress at Aurora Ave. Bridge and from Issaquah to North Bend. Watch for speed restrictions and flagmen. Some sections one lane during v^orking hours. Minor deloys. Possible night work. 5. interstate AOS. N.E. 53rd to N.E. lASth. Grading and bridge construction. 60 mph. Possible flagmen. No delays. 6. SR 520. 1 16th Ave. N.E, bridge construction. Watch for flagmen. Possible deI ays. Projects noted in this report relate only to Interstate 90. South Bel levue Interchange. Grading and bridge construction. Periodic lane closures. Possible minor delays. construction or maintenance which might Interstate 90.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    CHAPTER 12 GOAL 12: TRANSPORTATION SECTION 12.0 TRANSPORTATION GOAL To develop and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. SECTION 12.1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN OVERVIEW 12.1.010 Development of Transportation System Plan (TSP) The City of Umatilla, in conjunction with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), initiated a study of the City of Umatilla’s transportation system in the late fall of 1997. The purpose of the study was to develop a plan to guide the management of existing transportation facilities as well as the development of future facilities over the next 20 years. The plan was prepared in compliance with State of Oregon legislation requiring local jurisdictions to prepare a Transportation System Plan (TSP) as part of their overall Comprehensive Plan. In addition, recommendations are provided for Umatilla County and ODOT for incorporation with their respective planning. State of Oregon guidelines stipulate that the TSP must be based on the current comprehensive plan land use map and must provide a transportation system that accommodates the expected 20- year growth in population and employment that will result from implementation of the land use plan. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 197.712 and the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) administrative rule known as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), requires that all jurisdictions develop the following: A road plan for a network of arterial and collector streets A public transit plan A bicycle and pedestrian plan An air, rail, water, and pipeline plans A transportation finance plan Policies and ordinances for implementing the transportation system plan The TPR requires that alternative travel modes be given equal consideration and that reasonable effort be applied to the development and enhancement of the alternative modes in providing the future transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    CITY of LA GRANDE ORDINANCE NUMBER 3208 SERIES 2013 “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA GRANDE, UNION COUNTY, OREGON, AMENDING THE STATEWIDE GOALS CHAPTERS 8, 11 AND 12 OF THE CITY OF LA GRANDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; RECODIFYING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 3182, SERIES 2009, AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE” WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission has updated the Park Master Plan, which was incorporated into the Goal 5 Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the updated Park Master Plan will amend the Goal 8 Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, replacing all prior adopted Park Master Plans; and, WHEREAS, a large portion of the UGB Expansion Area identified in the Goal 9 chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, which was added to the City’s UGB in 2006, contains a large amount of land encumbered by wetlands and special flood hazard areas. The Comprehensive Plan Map was amended to remove this encumbered land from the UGB in exchange for land between Interstate 84 and Pierce Road, referenced as the UGB Exchange Area; and, WHEREAS, the City contracted with Anderson Perry & Associates to conduct a Public Facilities and Services Analysis for the UGB Expansion Area identified in the Goal 9 Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the UGB Exchange Area located between Interstate 84 and Pierce Road; and, WHEREAS, Anderson Perry & Associates recommended amendments to the Goal 11 – Public Facilities & Services Chapter of the City’s
    [Show full text]