DOCSLIB.ORG

National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211 National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211 and the following DOI, USGS, 1:500,000 (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Critical habitat scale hydrologic unit maps: State of is designated to include all river Oregon, 1974 and State of California, reaches accessible to listed coho salm- 1978 which are incorporated by ref- on between Cape Blanco, Oregon, and erence. This incorporation by reference Punta Gorda, California. Critical habi- was approved by the Director of the tat consists of the water, substrate, Federal Register in accordance with 5 and adjacent riparian zone of estuarine U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies and riverine reaches (including off- of the USGS publication and maps may channel habitats) in hydrologic units be obtained from the USGS, Map Sales, and counties identified in Table 6 of Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Copies may this part. Accessible reaches are those be inspected at NMFS, Protected Re- within the historical range of the ESU sources Division, 525 NE Oregon that can still be occupied by any life Street—Suite 500, Portland, OR 97232– stage of coho salmon. Inaccessible 2737, or NMFS, Office of Protected Re- sources, 1315 East-West Highway, Sil- reaches are those above specific dams ver Spring, MD 20910, or at the Na- identified in Table 6 of this part or tional Archives and Records Adminis- above longstanding, naturally impass- tration (NARA). For information on able barriers (i.e., natural waterfalls in the availability of this material at existence for at least several hundred NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// years). www.archives.gov/federallregister/ [64 FR 24061, May 5, 1999, as amended at 69 codeloflfederallregulations/ FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004] ibrllocations.html. (a) Central California Coast Coho Salm- § 226.211 Critical habitat for Seven on (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Critical Evolutionarily Significant Units habitat is designated to include all (ESUs) of Salmon (Oncorhynchus river reaches accessible to listed coho spp.) in California. salmon from Punta Gorda in northern Critical habitat is designated in the California south to the San Lorenzo following California counties for the River in central California, including following ESUs as described in para- Arroyo Corte Madera Del Presidio and graph (a) of this section, and as further Corte Madera Creek, tributaries to San described in paragraphs (b) through (e) Francisco Bay. Critical habitat con- of this section. The textual descrip- sists of the water, substrate, and adja- tions of critical habitat for each ESU cent riparian zone of estuarine and are included in paragraphs (f) through riverine reaches (including off-channel habitats) in hydrologic units and coun- (l) of this section, and these descrip- ties identified in Table 5 of this part. tions are the definitive source for de- Accessible reaches are those within the termining the critical habitat bound- historical range of the ESU that can aries. General location maps are pro- still be occupied by any life stage of vided at the end of each ESU descrip- coho salmon. Inaccessible reaches are tion (paragraphs (f) through (l) of this those above specific dams identified in section) and are provided for general Table 5 of this part or above long- guidance purposes only, and not as a standing, naturally impassable barriers definitive source for determining crit- (i.e., natural waterfalls in existence for ical habitat boundaries. at least several hundred years). (a) Critical habitat is designated for (b) Southern Oregon/Northern Cali- the following ESUs in the following fornia Coasts Coho Salmon California counties: ESU State—counties (1) California Coastal Chinook .................................................... CA—Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino, Sonoma, Lake, Napa, Glenn, Colusa, and Tehama. (2) Northern California Steelhead ............................................... CA—Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino, Sonoma, Lake, Glenn, Colusa, and Tehama. (3) Central California Coast Steelhead ....................................... CA—Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma, Napa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Joaquin. (4) South-Central Coast Steelhead ............................................. CA—Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo. 409 VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:01 Nov 30, 2011 Jkt 223231 PO 00000 Frm 00419 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\X50\50V9.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 § 226.211 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–11 Edition) ESU State—counties (5) Southern California Steelhead ............................................... CA—San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego. (6) Central Valley spring-run Chinook ......................................... CA—Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Shasta, Yolo, Sacramento, So- lano, Colusa, Yuba, Sutter, Trinity, Alameda, San Joaquin, and Contra Costa. (7) Central Valley Steelhead ....................................................... CA—Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Shasta, Yolo, Sacramento, Solona, Yuba, Sutter, Placer, Calaveras, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Merced, Alameda, Contra Costa. (b) Critical habitat boundaries. Critical wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks habitat includes the stream channels and boulders, side channels, and under- within the designated stream reaches, cut banks supporting juvenile and and includes a lateral extent as defined adult mobility and survival. by the ordinary high-water line (33 (4) Estuarine areas free of obstruc- CFR 329.11). In areas where the ordi- tion and excessive predation with: nary high-water line has not been de- (i) Water quality, water quantity, fined, the lateral extent will be defined and salinity conditions supporting ju- by the bankfull elevation. Bankfull ele- venile and adult physiological transi- vation is the level at which water be- tions between fresh- and saltwater; gins to leave the channel and move (ii) Natural cover such as submerged into the floodplain and is reached at a and overhanging large wood, aquatic discharge which generally has a recur- vegetation, large rocks and boulders, rence interval of 1 to 2 years on the an- side channels; and nual flood series. Critical habitat in es- (iii) Juvenile and adult forage, in- tuaries (e.g. San Francisco-San Pablo- cluding aquatic invertebrates and Suisun Bay, Humboldt Bay, and Morro fishes, supporting growth and matura- Bay) is defined by the perimeter of the tion. water body as displayed on standard (d) Exclusion of Indian lands. Critical 1:24,000 scale topographic maps or the habitat does not include occupied habi- elevation of extreme high water, tat areas on Indian lands. The Indian whichever is greater. lands specifically excluded from crit- (c) Primary constituent elements. With- ical habitat are those defined in the in these areas, the primary constituent Secretarial Order, including: elements essential for the conservation (1) Lands held in trust by the United of these ESUs are those sites and habi- States for the benefit of any Indian tat components that support one or tribe; more life stages, including: (2) Land held in trust by the United (1) Freshwater spawning sites with States for any Indian Tribe or indi- water quantity and quality conditions vidual subject to restrictions by the and substrate supporting spawning, in- United States against alienation; cubation and larval development; (3) Fee lands, either within or outside (2) Freshwater rearing sites with: the reservation boundaries, owned by (i) Water quantity and floodplain the tribal government; and connectivity to form and maintain (4) Fee lands within the reservation physical habitat conditions and sup- boundaries owned by individual Indi- port juvenile growth and mobility; ans. (ii) Water quality and forage sup- (e) Land owned or controlled by the De- porting juvenile development; and partment of Defense. Additionally, crit- (iii) Natural cover such as shade, sub- ical habitat does not include the fol- merged and overhanging large wood, lowing areas owned or controlled by log jams and beaver dams, aquatic the Department of Defense, or des- vegetation, large rocks and boulders, ignated for its use, that are subject to side channels, and undercut banks. an integrated natural resources man- (3) Freshwater migration corridors agement plan prepared under section free of obstruction and excessive preda- 101 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a): tion with water quantity and quality (1) Camp Pendleton Marine Corps conditions and natural cover such as Base; submerged and overhanging large (2) Vandenberg Air Force Base; 410 VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:01 Nov 30, 2011 Jkt 223231 PO 00000 Frm 00420 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\X50\50V9.TXT ofr150 PsN: PC150 National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211 (3) Camp San Luis Obispo; Fork Mad River (40.8687, –123.9649); (4) Camp Roberts; and Squaw Creek (40.9426, –124.0202); Warren (5) Mare Island Army Reserve Center. Creek (40.8901, –124.0402). (f) California Coastal Chinook Salmon (ii) North Fork Mad River 110920. Out- (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Critical let(s) = North Fork Mad River (Lat habitat is designated to include the 40.8687, Long –123.9649) upstream to areas defined in the following endpoint(s) in: Sullivan Gulch (40.8646, CALWATER Hydrologic units: –123.9553); North Fork Mad River (1) Redwood Creek Hydrologic Unit (40.8837, –123.9436). 1107—(i) Orick Hydrologic Sub-area (iii) Butler Valley 110930. Outlet(s) = 110710. Outlet(s) = Redwood Creek (Lat Mad River (Lat 40.8449, Long –123.9807) –41.2923, Long –124.0917) upstream to upstream to endpoint(s)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012
    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012 A guide to resources and services For management and stewardship of the Russian River Watershed © www.robertjanover.com. Russian River & Big Sulphur Creek at Cloverdale, CA. Photo By Robert Janover Production of this directory was made possible through funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Conservation. In addition to this version of the directory, you can find updated versions online at www.sotoyomercd.org Russian River Watershed Directory version September 2012 - 1 - Preface The Sotoyome Resource Conservation District (RCD) has updated our Russian River Watershed directory to assist landowners, residents, professionals, educators, organizations and agencies interested in the many resources available for natural resource management and stewardship throughout the Russian River watershed. In 1997, The Sotoyome RCD compiled the first known resource directory of agencies and organization working in the Russian River Watershed. The directory was an example of an emerging Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) effort to encourage community-based solutions for natural resource management. Since that Photo courtesy of Sonoma County Water Agency time the directory has gone through several updates with our most recent edition being released electronically and re-formatting for ease of use. For more information or to include your organization in the Directory, please contact the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Sotoyome Resource Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Russian River Recorder
    I I I II I -T RUSSIAN RIVER m RECORDER FALL 2018 • ISSUE 141 An Official Publication of the Healdsburg Museum & Historical Society Pari One In This Issue Welcome to our first in a series issue of the Cardiff contributed an interesting profile of his Russian River Recorder focused on "Healdsburg's great-great grandfather, the prominent pioneer Pioneers." Once a year we will publish an issue Healdsburg merchant Franz Conrad Rudolph Hertel. filled with profiles of the people who settled and Great-granddaughter Lynda Taylor Pheasant has built our town in its first twenty years, 1857 to 1877. written a compelling "genealogy of a house" by Some of the names may be familiar; some will be revealing the interconnected early residents of the less well known. In either case, we think you'll Mary Thistle cottage. discover new and interesting stories about each of The Museum staff writers have each them. produced a new piece for this issue. Office Executive Director/Curator Holly Hoods Manager and avid historical researcher Jane establishes the historic context of this era with the Bonham, who can trace her own Bonham roots to appropriately named article, "Life in Pioneer the founding years of Healdsburg, provided Healdsburg." This vivid description of a small additional context with her piece on Healdsburg's town's early years quickly dispels any romantic pioneer builders. Holly Hoods presented the notions regarding the realities of pioneer life. unusual journey of the first African-American We happily welcome several first-time residents of Healdsburg, the Martha and William contributors to our publication.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Foss Creek Pathway Plan
    Foss Creek Pathway Plan City of Healdsburg Foss Creek Pathway Plan Prepared for City of Healdsburg Metropolitan Transportation Commission Prepared by City of Healdsburg Planning Department Landmark Planning and Permit Service Andy Gustavson, Principal Alta Planning + Design George Hudson, Principal Josh Abrams, Associate In association with North Coast Railroad Authority Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Adopted by Healdsburg City Council October 2, 2006 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................ii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................3 1.1 Summary............................................................................................. 3 1.2 Background.......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Plan Process......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization .................................................................................. 4 2 Pathway Setting............................................................................................5 2.1 Foss Creek ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Northwestern Pacific Railroad ................................................................... 5 2.3 Geysers Wastewater Pipeline .................................................................... 6 3 Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 12-1986 Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation California Regional Water Quality Control Board, "Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2)" (1986). California Agencies. Paper 393. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/393 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATER QUA~ITY · CONTROL PLAN Cover photo by: MICHAEL DRENNAN. Senior Water Resources Engineer San Francisco Bay Region DONALD E. ANDERSON, CHAIRMAN PETER W. SNYDER, VICE CHAIRMAN* FRED KLATTE* JANICE E. MONDAVI MARION OTSEA • KENNETH R. MERCER JEPTHA WADE PHILIP WENTE *Basin Plan Committee 1986 3 F N R R This report was prepared under the direction of Roger B. James ......................................................................... Executive Officer Lawrence P. Kolb ...................................................................... Assistant Executive Officer Richard H. Whitsel ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence
    Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area For Current Presence STATE wa RecoveryUnit CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Chilliwack River 0.424000 Columbia River 194.728000 Depot Creek 0.728000 Kettle River 0.001000 Palouse River 6.209000 Silesia Creek 0.374000 Skagit River 0.258000 Snake River 58.637000 Sumas River 1.449000 Yakima River 0.845000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 1 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Clark Fork River Basin CORE_AREA Priest Lake NAME SumOfMILES Bench Creek 2.114000 Cache Creek 2.898000 Gold Creek 3.269000 Jackson Creek 3.140000 Kalispell Creek 15.541000 Muskegon Creek 1.838000 North Fork Granite Creek 6.642000 Sema Creek 4.365000 South Fork Granite Creek 12.461000 Tillicum Creek 0.742000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Priest Lake (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 RecoveryUnit Clearwater River Basin CORE_AREA Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River NAME SumOfMILES Bess Creek 1.770000 Snake River 0.077000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 2 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 2 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 98.250000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA'
    [Show full text]
  • 443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards
    Environmental Protection Agency § 131.33 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated of streams located in Indian country, Water Quality Standards or as may be modified by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region X, pursu- § 131.31 Arizona. ant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, ° (a) [Reserved] a temperature criterion of 10 C, ex- (b) The following waters have, in ad- pressed as an average of daily max- dition to the uses designated by the imum temperatures over a seven-day State, the designated use of fish con- period, applies to the waterbodies iden- sumption as defined in R18–11–101 tified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (which is available from the Arizona during the months of June, July, Au- Department of Environmental Quality, gust and September. Water Quality Division, 3033 North (2) The following waters are pro- Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012): tected for bull trout spawning and rearing: COLORADO MAIN STEM RIVER (i) BOISE-MORE BASIN: Devils BASIN: Creek, East Fork Sheep Creek, Sheep Hualapai Wash MIDDLE GILA RIVER BASIN: Creek. Agua Fria River (Camelback Road to (ii) BROWNLEE RESERVOIR BASIN: Avondale WWTP) Crooked River, Indian Creek. Galena Gulch (iii) CLEARWATER BASIN: Big Can- Gila River (Felix Road to the Salt yon Creek, Cougar Creek, Feather River) Creek, Laguna Creek, Lolo Creek, Queen Creek (Headwaters to the Su- Orofino Creek, Talapus Creek, West perior WWTP) Fork Potlatch River. Queen Creek (Below Potts Canyon) (iv) COEUR D’ALENE LAKE BASIN: SAN PEDRO RIVER BASIN: Cougar Creek, Fernan Creek, Kid Copper Creek Creek, Mica Creek, South Fork Mica SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN: Creek, Squaw Creek, Turner Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California
    Becker Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Resources South of the Golden Gate, California October 2008 Gordon S. Becker #ENTERFOR%COSYSTEM-ANAGEMENT2ESTORATION Isabelle J. Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Cartography by David A. Asbury Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy and The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Resources South of the Golden Gate, California The mission of the Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration is to make effective use of scientific information to promote the restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems. The Center is a not-for-profit corporation, and contributions in support of its programs are tax-deductible. Center for Ecosystem Management & Restoration 4179 Piedmont Ave, Suite 325, Oakland, CA 94611 Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 510.420.4565 http://www.cemar.org CEMAR The cover image is a map of the watershed area of streams tributary to the Pacific Ocean south of the Golden Gate, California, by CEMAR. The image above is a 1934 Gazos Creek stream survey report published by the California Division of Fish and Game. Book design by Audrey Kallander. Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Gordon S. Becker Isabelle J. Reining Cartography by David A. Asbury This report should be cited as: Becker, G.S. and I.J. Reining. 2008. Steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) resources south of the Golden Gate, California. Cartography by D.A. Asbury. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration. Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward pg. 3 Introduction pg.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Water Bodies
    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • February 25, 2021 | 5 :00 Pm
    SONOMA COUNTY OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Online Meeting Due to Sonoma County’s Shelter in Place Order February 25, 2021 | 5 :00 pm MEMBERS PLEASE CALL IF UNABLE TO ATTEND In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the February 25, 2021 Advisory Committee meeting will be held virtually via Zoom. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY NOT ATTEND THIS MEETING IN PERSON *UPDATE REGARDING VIEWING AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN February 25, 2021 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING* The February 25, 2021 Advisory Committee Meeting will be held online through Zoom. There will be no option for attending in person. Members of the public can watch or listen to the meeting using one of the following methods: Join the Zoom meeting on your computer, tablet or smartphone by clicking: https://sonomacounty.zoom.us/j/94187528658?pwd=WHNRZDBHaDlwRVd6NUVyNFk4TXlEUT09 1. If you have the Zoom app or web client, join the meeting using the Password: 390647 2. Call-in and listen to the meeting: Dial 1 669 900 9128 Enter meeting ID: 941 8752 8658 PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE MEETING: You may email public comment to [email protected]. All emailed public comments will be forwarded to all Committee Members and read aloud for the benefit of the public. Please include your name and the relevant agenda item number to which your comment refers. In addition, if you have joined as a member of the public through the Zoom link or by calling in, there will be specific points throughout the meeting during which live public comment may be made via Zoom and phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Measured Sections of Paleogene Rocks from the California Coast Ranges for Field Conference on the Paleogene of California Sponso
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MEASURED SECTIONS OF PALEOGENE ROCKS FROM THE CALIFORNIA COAST RANGES By Earl E. Brabb, Joseph C. Clark and Constance K Throckmorton OPEN-FILE REPORT 77-714 FOR FIELD CONFERENCE ON THE PALEOGENE OF CALIFORNIA SPONSORED BY INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON PALEOGENE STRATIGRAPHY This report is pretiminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards and nomencla­ ture Menlo Park, California 1977 REPORT PREPARED FOR INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES (I.U.G.S.) INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON PALEOGENE STRATIGRAPHY Chairman: Vie e-Chairman: Secretary General: Prof. Ch. POMEROL Prof. H. BOLLI Dr. I. PREMOLI-SILVA Universite Paris VI Geologisches Institut Institute de Geologia Geol. Bassins sedimentaires Sonneggstrasse 5 Piazzale Gorini 15 4, place Jussieu 8006 ZURICH 20133 MILANO 75230 PARIS Cedex 05 SUISSE ITALIA FRANCE FIELD CONFERENCE ON THE PALEOGENE OF CALIFORNIA AND MEXICO October - November 1977 Local Committee for California Field Trips Earl E. Brabb, Chairman Richard Z. Poore Kristin A. McDougall William A. Berggren CONTENTS Introduction----------------------------------------------------1 Previous work---------------------------------------------3 Present investigation-------------------------------------6 Acknowledgement s-------------------------------------------6 Regional sett ing-----------------------------------------------6 Description of the sect ions-----------------------------------12 Glauconite-----------------------------------------------------15
    [Show full text]