DOCSLIB.ORG

Foss Creek Pathway Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foss Creek Pathway Plan Foss Creek Pathway Plan City of Healdsburg Foss Creek Pathway Plan Prepared for City of Healdsburg Metropolitan Transportation Commission Prepared by City of Healdsburg Planning Department Landmark Planning and Permit Service Andy Gustavson, Principal Alta Planning + Design George Hudson, Principal Josh Abrams, Associate In association with North Coast Railroad Authority Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Adopted by Healdsburg City Council October 2, 2006 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................ii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................3 1.1 Summary............................................................................................. 3 1.2 Background.......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Plan Process......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization .................................................................................. 4 2 Pathway Setting............................................................................................5 2.1 Foss Creek ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Northwestern Pacific Railroad ................................................................... 5 2.3 Geysers Wastewater Pipeline .................................................................... 6 3 Planning Goals and Policies .............................................................................7 3.1 Community Outreach.............................................................................. 7 3.2 Potential Pathway Users .......................................................................... 7 3.3 Pathway Vision Statement, Goals and Policies ............................................. 11 4 Pathway Alignment and Access....................................................................... 13 4.1 Railroad Station Reach .......................................................................... 14 4.2 Downtown Reach................................................................................. 15 4.3 Foss Creek South Reach......................................................................... 16 4.4 Foss Creek North Reach......................................................................... 18 4.5 North Healdsburg Reach ........................................................................ 19 5 Pathway Construction Standards..................................................................... 20 5.1 Railroad Setbacks ................................................................................ 21 5.2 Cross Section...................................................................................... 21 5.3 Construction Details ............................................................................. 22 5.4 Railroad Accommodation ....................................................................... 25 5.5 Pathway Crossings................................................................................ 26 6 Pathway Design Guidelines............................................................................ 28 6.1 Site Improvements and Amenities ............................................................ 28 6.2 Signs ................................................................................................ 31 7 Pathway Implementation Plan........................................................................ 33 7.1 Property Owner Permission .................................................................... 33 7.2 List of Reviewing Agencies ..................................................................... 33 7.3 Development Permits............................................................................ 36 7.4 Funding Sources .................................................................................. 36 7.5 Phasing and Cost Estimates .................................................................... 36 Appendix A – Survey Results Appendix B – Funding Sources Appendix C - Pathway Alignment Details i Acknowledgements A number of individuals and agencies made valuable contributions the preparation of the Foss Creek Pathway Plan. The North Coast Railroad Authority and the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transportation Authority granted their support to the project within their right-of-way and allowed the City of Healdsburg to seek funding to prepare the plan. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission awarded the City a substantial Livable Community Grant to fund the preparation of the Plan. The residents of the city took an active role in formulating the Plan by completing a public survey, reviewing the draft plan and providing comments at a public workshop. Finally, the staff from public agencies who joined the Technical Advisory Committee are recognized for their substantial guidance and insight they freely offered during the preparation of the Plan. Funding and Participating Agencies Metropolitan Transportation Commission City of Healdsburg Redevelopment Agency North Coast Railroad Authority Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transportation Authority Technical Advisory Committee Robert W. Floerke, California Department of Fish & Game Allan Buckmann, California Department of Fish & Game Thomas Krakow P. E., DKS Associates Mike Strider, HDR Engineering, Inc. Lynn Woznicki, Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau Annie Young, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Rick Kennedy, North Coast Railroad Authority Mitch Stogner, North Coast Railroad Authority John Darling, Northwestern Pacific Railway Co., LLC Steve Schmitz, Sonoma County Transit Janet Spilman, Sonoma County Transportation Authority Robin Goodman, City of Healdsburg Community Services Bill Duarte, City of Healdsburg Electric Utility Randy Collins, City of Healdsburg Fire Department Susan Jones, City of Healdsburg Police Department George Hicks, City of Healdsburg Public Works Department ii 1 Introduction 1.1 Summary This Plan establishes the alignment and design standards the City of Healdsburg will use to construct the Foss Creek Pathway alongside the Northwestern Pacific Railroad and Foss Creek between Front Street and the city’s north boundary. The pathway will complete a 4.1-mile long bicycle and pedestrian facility through the city by connecting to the existing bike lane along South Healdsburg Avenue, which continues south along Old Redwood Highway to the Town of Windsor. At the north end of the city, the pathway will tie into a bike lane along Healdsburg Avenue that will eventually run to the north city limit line and provide access to Alexander Valley. Completion of the pathway will provide cyclists with safe and convenient bicycle access from the City to northern Sonoma County's premiere wine production areas. The pathway will also tie major destinations together within the city by connecting residential areas with employment centers, recreational areas (such as Veteran’s Memorial Beach Park and the Carson Warner Memorial Skate Park) and the downtown. It will provide children a safe route to school, and create a pedestrian/bicycle link to the planned Healdsburg intermodal transit facility and railroad station. Major segments of the pathway will lie adjacent to Foss Creek and provide the public with opportunities to view its riparian vegetation. The Healdsburg City Council made the pathway a priority because of its benefit to community residents and businesses and to Sonoma County visitors. The regional value of this pathway is recognized by its inclusion in the Sonoma County Bicycle Plan and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Regional Bicycle Plan. It is also included in the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transportation (SMART) Plan as a segment of its planned railroad right-of-way bikeway and as a needed pedestrian and bicycle link to the historic Healdsburg Train Station, which is planned for restoration. Numerous agencies have recognized the merits of this project through the awarding of funding. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) awarded a $50,000 Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) grant to the City to prepare this plan and to complete environmental review. In addition, MTC allocated approximately $100,000 in Transportation Development Act funds that allowed the City to construct approximately 1,200 feet of the pathway in the city’s downtown in 2005. The Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District has granted another $100,000 to help construct the pathway from Front Street to the Healdsburg Railroad Station. Finally, in 2004, United States Representative Mike Thompson worked to obtain a $1.25 million federal grant to construct the remainder of the project. 1.2 Background In 1998, the City renewed its landscape easement with the North Coast Rail Authority (NCRA) and secured the right to develop a public pathway within the railroad right-of-way in the downtown area. In 2001, the City completed a pathway feasibility study, which identified a north-south corridor in which a pathway could be built through the city. This study was then used to secure a grant from MTC’s TLC Planning Grant program to prepare this Plan. 1.3 Plan Process The Plan is based on a preliminary feasibility study and a series of technical working papers prepared by Alta Planning + Design during 2002-04, which established that the pathway could be built along Foss Creek and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012
    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012 A guide to resources and services For management and stewardship of the Russian River Watershed © www.robertjanover.com. Russian River & Big Sulphur Creek at Cloverdale, CA. Photo By Robert Janover Production of this directory was made possible through funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Conservation. In addition to this version of the directory, you can find updated versions online at www.sotoyomercd.org Russian River Watershed Directory version September 2012 - 1 - Preface The Sotoyome Resource Conservation District (RCD) has updated our Russian River Watershed directory to assist landowners, residents, professionals, educators, organizations and agencies interested in the many resources available for natural resource management and stewardship throughout the Russian River watershed. In 1997, The Sotoyome RCD compiled the first known resource directory of agencies and organization working in the Russian River Watershed. The directory was an example of an emerging Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) effort to encourage community-based solutions for natural resource management. Since that Photo courtesy of Sonoma County Water Agency time the directory has gone through several updates with our most recent edition being released electronically and re-formatting for ease of use. For more information or to include your organization in the Directory, please contact the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Sotoyome Resource Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Russian River Recorder
    I I I II I -T RUSSIAN RIVER m RECORDER FALL 2018 • ISSUE 141 An Official Publication of the Healdsburg Museum & Historical Society Pari One In This Issue Welcome to our first in a series issue of the Cardiff contributed an interesting profile of his Russian River Recorder focused on "Healdsburg's great-great grandfather, the prominent pioneer Pioneers." Once a year we will publish an issue Healdsburg merchant Franz Conrad Rudolph Hertel. filled with profiles of the people who settled and Great-granddaughter Lynda Taylor Pheasant has built our town in its first twenty years, 1857 to 1877. written a compelling "genealogy of a house" by Some of the names may be familiar; some will be revealing the interconnected early residents of the less well known. In either case, we think you'll Mary Thistle cottage. discover new and interesting stories about each of The Museum staff writers have each them. produced a new piece for this issue. Office Executive Director/Curator Holly Hoods Manager and avid historical researcher Jane establishes the historic context of this era with the Bonham, who can trace her own Bonham roots to appropriately named article, "Life in Pioneer the founding years of Healdsburg, provided Healdsburg." This vivid description of a small additional context with her piece on Healdsburg's town's early years quickly dispels any romantic pioneer builders. Holly Hoods presented the notions regarding the realities of pioneer life. unusual journey of the first African-American We happily welcome several first-time residents of Healdsburg, the Martha and William contributors to our publication.
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Water Bodies
    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • February 25, 2021 | 5 :00 Pm
    SONOMA COUNTY OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Online Meeting Due to Sonoma County’s Shelter in Place Order February 25, 2021 | 5 :00 pm MEMBERS PLEASE CALL IF UNABLE TO ATTEND In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the February 25, 2021 Advisory Committee meeting will be held virtually via Zoom. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY NOT ATTEND THIS MEETING IN PERSON *UPDATE REGARDING VIEWING AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN February 25, 2021 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING* The February 25, 2021 Advisory Committee Meeting will be held online through Zoom. There will be no option for attending in person. Members of the public can watch or listen to the meeting using one of the following methods: Join the Zoom meeting on your computer, tablet or smartphone by clicking: https://sonomacounty.zoom.us/j/94187528658?pwd=WHNRZDBHaDlwRVd6NUVyNFk4TXlEUT09 1. If you have the Zoom app or web client, join the meeting using the Password: 390647 2. Call-in and listen to the meeting: Dial 1 669 900 9128 Enter meeting ID: 941 8752 8658 PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE MEETING: You may email public comment to [email protected]. All emailed public comments will be forwarded to all Committee Members and read aloud for the benefit of the public. Please include your name and the relevant agenda item number to which your comment refers. In addition, if you have joined as a member of the public through the Zoom link or by calling in, there will be specific points throughout the meeting during which live public comment may be made via Zoom and phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the California Freshwater Shrimp
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan forthe California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pw~jflca Holmes 1895) Total Postorbital Length Carapace Length Rostrum Length CL RL First Antenna Pleopod I (PerelopodI) Second Antenna Figure 1. The California freshwater shrimp, Syncaris pac~fiCa. CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispac~fica Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Manager, Califo~~~i’evada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. wish and Wildlife Service Date: CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispa~flca Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regionai Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • August 25, 2016
    Attachment "A" SONOMA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 26, 2016 MINUTES 5:05 pm Meeting convened at the District office, 747 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 100, Santa Rosa, California Members Present Cary Fargo Bill Smith Laurie Gallian Jan McFarland John Nagle John Dell’Osso Sue Conley Steve Rabinowitsh Curt Nichols Members Absent Don McEnhill Jeffrey Holtzman Gary Wysocky Kristin Thigpen Doug Lipton Staff Present Bill Keene, General Manager; Sheri Emerson, Stewardship Program Manager; Kathleen Marsh, Stewardship Coordinator; Bob Pittman, County Counsel; Mariah Robson, Advisory Committee Clerk Chair Rabinowitsh called the meeting to order at 5:05 pm. Public Comment Duane DeWitt spoke about the Roseland neighborhood in Santa Rosa. The District has helped protect many areas of Roseland and Mr. DeWitt expressed his gratitude toward the District for helping this disadvantaged area of Santa Rosa. However, he feels that the City of Santa Rosa is not taking care of the protected areas to stay in a natural state, but instead are developing the land. He asked that the Advisory Committee and District staff help him and the Roseland neighbors to keep the parks and nature areas natural and undeveloped. Approval of Minutes Chair Rabinowitsh asked for the approval of the minutes. Bill Smith motioned for approval, and Cary Fargo seconded the motion. The minutes of April 28, 2016 were approved with one correction submitted by Laurie Gallian. She asked that in the announcement of the Mayors’ and Councilmember’s meeting, the wording should change from ‘will have Measure AA on the agenda’ to ‘will endorse Measure AA which is on the agenda’.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4 Water Quality Compliance
    SECTION 4 :DWHU4XDOLW\&RPSOLDQFH 7KLVVHFWLRQRIWKH6:53SURYLGHVDQRYHUYLHZRI SWRP CHECKLIST GUIDELINES EHQHILFLDOXVHVRIZDWHUVZLWKLQWKH5XVVLDQ5LYHU ZDWHUVKHG ZDWHU TXDOLW\ UHJXODWRU\ VWDQGDUGV ܈ Plan identifies activities that generate or contribute SRWHQWLDOVRXUFHVRISROOXWDQWVDQGDQH[SODQDWLRQ to the pollution of storm water or dry weather runoff, or that impair the effective beneficial use of RIKRZWKH6:53LVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKH[LVWLQJDQG storm water or dry weather runoff. SODQQHGUHJXODWRU\UHTXLUHPHQWVDQGSHUPLWV ܈ Plan describes how it is consistent with and assists in, compliance with TMDL implementation :$7(548$/,7<35,25,7,(6 plans and NPDES permits. See also Section 7.3.2. 7KH 1&5:4&% KDV LGHQWLILHG D YDULHW\ RI ܈ Plan identifies applicable permits and describes how it meets all applicable waste discharge EHQHILFLDOXVHVIRUWKHZDWHUVRIWKH5XVVLDQ5LYHU permit requirements. 7KH XVHV DUH RXWOLQHG LQ WKH 1&5:4&%¶V :DWHU4XDOLW\ &RQWURO 3ODQ IRU WKH 1RUWK &RDVW 5HJLRQ%HQHILFLDOXVHVDUHLGHQWLILHGE\WKH6WDWH:DWHU5HVRXUFHV&RQWURO%RDUG 6:5&% IRUDOO ZDWHUVRIWKH6WDWHDVGHILQHGE\&DOLIRUQLD:DWHU&RGHDQGPD\LQFOXGHDQ\RIWKHXVHVOLVWHG LQ7DEOHVXFKDV x $JULFXOWXUDODQG,QGXVWULDO6XSSO\ x *URXQGZDWHU5HFKDUJH x 1DYLJDWLRQ x :DWHU&RQWDFW5HFUHDWLRQ x 1RQ&RQWDFW:DWHU5HFUHDWLRQ x &RPPHUFLDODQG6SRUW)LVKLQJ x :DUPDQG&ROG)UHVKZDWHU+DELWDW x :LOGOLIH+DELWDW x 5DUH7KUHDWHQHGRU(QGDQJHUV6SHFLHV x 0LJUDWLRQRI$TXDWLF2UJDQLVPV x 6SDZQLQJ5HSURGXFWLRQDQGRU(DUO\'HYHORSPHQW ,Q DGGLWLRQ WR WKHVH EHQHILFLDO XVHV WKH 5XVVLDQ 5LYHU ZDWHUVKHG KDV WKH SRWHQWLDO WR VXSSO\ LQGXVWULDOSURFHVVHVVXFKDVPLQLQJFRROLQJZDWHUVXSSO\K\GUDXOLFFRQYH\DQFHJUDYHOZDVKLQJ
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H: Biological Resources Special Status Species Table
    Plan Bay Area Environmental Impact Report Appendix H: Biological Resources Special‐Status Species Table H‐1 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST TABLE H‐1: FOCUSED LIST OF SPECIAL‐STATUS SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN OR NEAR PROPOSED PLAN BAY AREA PROJECTS Listing Status Common Name USFWS/CDFG Scientific Name / CNPS General Habitat SPECIES LISTED AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED Invertebrates Conservancy fairy shrimp FE/‐‐ Endemic to grasslands of the northern two‐thirds of Branchinecta conservatio Critical the Central Valley; found in large turbid seasonal Habitat pools. Longhorn fairy shrimp FE/‐‐ Endemic to the eastern margin of the central coast Branchinecta longiantenna Critical mountains in seasonal grassland vernal pools; typically Habitat found in sandstone depressions or clear‐to‐turbid clay or grass bottomed pools. Vernal pool fairy shrimp FT/‐‐ Grassland vernal pools. Branchinecta lynchi Critical Habitat Vernal pool tadpole shrimp FE/‐‐ Vernal pools and swales in the Sacramento Valley with Lepidurus packardi clear to highly turbid water; pools commonly found in grass‐bottomed swales of unplowed grasslands, also can be mud‐bottomed and highly turbid. San Bruno elfin butterfly FE/‐‐ Coastal scrub. Callophrys mossii bayensis Valley elderberry longhorn beetle FT/‐‐ Dependent on elderberry bushes, which may occur Desmocerus californicus dimorphus individually or associated with riparian habitats. Bay checkerspot butterfly FT/‐‐ Serpentine bunchgrass grassland. Euphydryas editha bayensis Critical Habitat Mission blue butterfly FE/‐‐ Grasslands with Lupinus albifrons, L. formosa, and Plebejus icarioides missionensis L. varicolor. H‐1 Appendices Appendix H: Biological Resources TABLE H‐1: FOCUSED LIST OF SPECIAL‐STATUS SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN OR NEAR PROPOSED PLAN BAY AREA PROJECTS Listing Status Common Name USFWS/CDFG Scientific Name / CNPS General Habitat SPECIES LISTED AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED Callippe silverspot butterfly FE/‐‐ Grasslands with Viola pedunculata as larval food plant.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue …
    Vine Times News from the Sonoma County Winegrowers WINTER 2016 IN THIS ISSUE … President’s Report . 2 Marketing News . 6-7 Sustainability Update . .9 Grower Programs . 11 Sponsor Listings . 12 Sangiacomo Vineyard Sangiacomo Community Recognition . .13-14 Photo credit: credit: Photo Proud recipient of California’s highest environmental honor, the 2016 Governor’s Environmental & ANOTHER SENSATIONAL HARVEST Economic Leadership Award IN SONOMA COUNTY! Page 6: With the last grapes picked and delivered to local wineries in mid-October, Sonoma 10th Anniversary County is now celebrating another successful harvest season. The 2016 vintage will of Grape Camp be remembered for what didn’t happen - as it was a relatively stress-free year with ideal growing conditions and weather, including adequate rainfall that replenished the Page 9: aquifers after several years of drought, no major threats from frost in the spring, and New Sustainability moderate temperatures throughout the summer with only a few days of heat spikes. Manager Thank you, Mother Nature! From all reports, 2016 has produced an outstanding, sensational crop in terms of qual- ity, flavors, etc. that has excited our winemaker partners. This vintage has also turned out to be an average year in terms of yield, and that’s true across the board for most varieties around the county. Page 10: All the credit for this year’s exceptional quality goes to you, our grape growers, who Sonoma County Grape work tirelessly year ‘round, day and night, to ensure we farm and grow the best wine- Growers Foundation grapes possible. Cheers to you! All of us at the Sonoma County Winegrape Commission extend our best wishes to you and your family this holiday season.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message from the Director Creating a Resilient Russian River As The
    Inspiring the Community to Protect the Russian River Forever A PUBLICATION OF RUSSIAN RIVERKEEPER SUMMER 2015 A Message from the Director For our economy and river ecosystems to not just survive but thrive in the next drought we can take four steps that are key to creating a Resilient Russian River: Creating A Resilient Russian River As the Weather 1. Permanently reduce our per capita water use, whether on city Gets More Extreme water or private wells 2. Invest in groundwater recharge, from farms to homes to schools, to bank more water Over the last two years our research into improving the health 3. Invest in reducing pollution levels to protect and preserve of the Russian River has led us in many directions with one more potable water common theme emerging at every turn – we are extremely 4. Increase the width of the river to dramatically improve vulnerable to changing weather patterns on the Russian River. groundwater recharge We see our weather patterns shifting dramatically from the last 50-100 years of records, lining up with predictions of disasters from too much or too little rainfall. We’re already seeing these issues in Healdsburg- in the middle of a multi-year drought we had a major flood on Foss Creek on December 11th and today are right back into drought conditions. The source of vulnerability in our community is two fold - first, we channelized our creeks to make more room for buildings and second, we replaced permeable soils with concrete, pavement and rooftops. The hard surfaces cause rainfall on developed areas to rapidly move to under-sized creeks, carrying all the pollutants from hard surfaces right into our water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Waters of the United States in California with Salmon And/Or Steelhead Identified As NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP
    Waters of the United States in California with Salmon and/or Steelhead identified as NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP ESU Hydrologic Unit Sub-area Outlet Stream Stream' Watershed Name Hydrologic Unit Sub-area 0 California Coast chinook salmon 1 (1) Redwood Creek Hydrologic Unit 1107— Redwood Creek Hydrologic Unit 1107 2 (i) Orick Hydrologic Sub-area 110710. Orick Hydrologic Sub-area 110710 3 Outlet(s) = Redwood Creek (Lat –41.2923, Long –124.0917) upstream to endpoint(s) in: 4 Boyes Creek (41.3639, –123.9845); 5 Bridge Creek (41.137, –124.0012); 6 Brown Creek (41.3986, –124.0012); 7 Emerald (Harry Weir) (41.2142, –123.9812); 8 Godwood Creek (41.3889, –124.0312); 9 Larry Dam Creek (41.3359, –124.003); 10 Little Lost Man Creek (41.2944, –124.0014); 11 Lost Man Creek (41.3133, –123.9854); 12 May Creek (41.3547, –123.999); 13 McArthur Creek (41.2705, –124.041); 14 North Fork Lost Man Creek (41.3374, –123.9935); 15 Prairie Creek (41.4239, –124.0367); 16 Tom McDonald (41.1628, –124.0419). 17 (ii) Beaver Hydrologic Sub-area 110720. Beaver Hydrologic Sub-area 110720 18 Outlet(s) = Redwood Creek (Lat 41.1367, Long –123.9309) upstream to endpoint(s): 19 Lacks Creek (41.0334, –123.8124); 20 Minor Creek (40.9706, –123.7899). 21 (iii) Lake Prairie Hydrologic Sub-area 110730. Lake Prairie Hydrologic Sub-area 110730 22 Outlet(s) = Redwood Creek (Lat 40.9070, Long –123.8170) upstream to endpoint(s) in: 23 Redwood Creek (40.7432, –123.7206). 24 (2) Trinidad Hydrologic Unit 1108— Trinidad Hydrologic Unit 1108 25 (i) Big Lagoon Hydrologic Sub-area 110810.
    [Show full text]