DOCSLIB.ORG

Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area For Current Presence STATE wa RecoveryUnit CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Chilliwack River 0.424000 Columbia River 194.728000 Depot Creek 0.728000 Kettle River 0.001000 Palouse River 6.209000 Silesia Creek 0.374000 Skagit River 0.258000 Snake River 58.637000 Sumas River 1.449000 Yakima River 0.845000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 1 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Clark Fork River Basin CORE_AREA Priest Lake NAME SumOfMILES Bench Creek 2.114000 Cache Creek 2.898000 Gold Creek 3.269000 Jackson Creek 3.140000 Kalispell Creek 15.541000 Muskegon Creek 1.838000 North Fork Granite Creek 6.642000 Sema Creek 4.365000 South Fork Granite Creek 12.461000 Tillicum Creek 0.742000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Priest Lake (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 RecoveryUnit Clearwater River Basin CORE_AREA Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River NAME SumOfMILES Bess Creek 1.770000 Snake River 0.077000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 2 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 2 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 98.250000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (1 detail record) SumMilesPerCoreArea 98.250000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 1 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 98.250000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 1 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 3 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Grande Ronde River Basin CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES 8.340000 Indian Tom Creek 4.489000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 12.829000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 CORE_AREA Grande Ronde River NAME SumOfMILES 0.037000 Butte Creek 7.129000 Crooked Creek 7.742000 First Creek 4.347000 Grande Ronde River 80.712000 Melton Creek 3.459000 Milk Creek 3.239000 North Fork Wenaha River 11.417000 South Fork Wenaha River 8.120000 Third Creek 3.290000 Wenaha River 21.750000 West Fork Butte Creek 2.182000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Grande Ronde River (12 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 153.424000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 12 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 166.253000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 14 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 4 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Hood River Basin CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 14.995000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (1 detail record) SumMilesPerCoreArea 14.995000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 1 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 14.995000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 1 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 5 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Lower Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 142.913000 Kalama River 0.659000 Lewis River 0.585000 White Salmon Creek 5.264000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (4 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 149.421000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 4 CORE_AREA Klickitat NAME SumOfMILES 1.340000 7.670000 0.825000 Clearwater Creek 0.443000 Klickitat River 63.781000 Little Muddy Creek 2.103000 Trappers Creek 1.585000 West Fork Klickitat River 4.554000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Klickitat (8 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 82.301000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 8 CORE_AREA Lewis NAME SumOfMILES 0.723000 2.996000 0.312000 Big Creek 0.118000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 6 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Lower Columbia River CORE_AREA Lewis NAME SumOfMILES Canyon Creek 0.531000 Chickoon Creek 0.247000 Cougar Creek 1.606000 Cussed Hollow 0.196000 Lewis River 67.274000 Muddy River 1.634000 Panamaker Creek 0.971000 Pine Creek 7.592000 Rush Creek 2.648000 Spencer Creek 0.356000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lewis (14 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 87.204000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 14 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 318.926000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 26 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 7 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Middle Columbia River CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES 0.629000 0.437000 0.468000 Ahtanum Creek 24.975000 American River 16.759000 Bear Creek 2.003000 Bear Creek 1.061000 Blowout Creek 1.365000 Box Canyon Creek 1.934000 Bumping River 21.284000 Cherry Creek 1.325000 Chief Creek 0.859000 Cle Elum River 37.216000 Cooper River 4.135000 Corral Creek 0.662000 Crow Creek 9.869000 Deep Creek 4.892000 DeRoux Creek 1.286000 Dog Creek 0.693000 Fortune Creek 2.333000 Gold Creek 5.243000 Grey Creek 0.317000 Hindoo Creek 1.213000 Indian Creek 4.582000 Jungle Creek 2.166000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 8 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Middle Columbia River CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Kachess River 13.500000 Kettle Creek 0.482000 Little Naches River 13.125000 Little Wildcat Creek 1.249000 Middle Fork Ahtanum Creek 6.794000 Middle Fork Little Naches Rive 4.731000 Milk Creek 3.825000 Naches River 44.654000 Nile Creek 7.071000 North Fork Ahtanum Creek 19.504000 North Fork Little Naches River 6.126000 North Fork Nile Creek 2.258000 North Fork Rattlesnake Creek 2.628000 North Fork Teanaway River 16.290000 North Fork Tieton River 18.215000 Oak Creek 3.200000 Orr Creek 3.422000 Pileup Creek 1.944000 Quartz Creek 2.915000 Rattlesnake Creek 21.245000 Rock Creek 0.220000 Rocky Run 0.510000 Shell Creek 0.145000 Shellneck Creek 0.991000 Short And Dirty Creek 0.788000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 9 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Middle Columbia River CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Shovel Creek 0.613000 South Fork Ahtanum Creek 13.233000 South Fork Cowiche Creek 0.243000 South Fork Little Naches River 8.708000 South Fork Tieton River 13.749000 Spruce Creek 0.579000 Teanaway River 10.984000 Teiton River 24.011000 Thunder Creek 3.256000 Timber Creek 0.185000 Union Creek 0.424000 Waptus River 11.953000 West Fork Bear Creek 1.906000 Wildcat Creek 6.175000 Yakima River 220.203000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Yakima (65 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 659.760000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 65 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 659.760000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 65 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 10 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Northeast Washington River Basins CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES 0.137000 Big Sheep Creek 4.044000 Blue Creek 0.864000 Boulder Creek 1.350000 Columbia River 142.719000 Deadman Creek 6.829000 Deep Creek 0.909000 Hawk Creek 3.413000 Jenny Creek 0.712000 Kettle River 33.228000 Little Boulder Creek 0.637000 Little Sheep Creek 2.774000 Monaghan Creek 0.758000 Nancy Creek 0.508000 Onion Creek 2.330000 Sanpoil River 9.259000 Sherman Creek 0.890000 Spokane River 29.404000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (18 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 240.765000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 18 CORE_AREA Pend Oreille NAME SumOfMILES Cedar Creek 1.834000 East Branch Le Clerc Creek 8.422000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 11 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Northeast Washington River Basins CORE_AREA Pend Oreille NAME SumOfMILES Fourth Of July Creek 0.264000 Indian Creek 0.171000 Le Clerc Creek 1.130000 Lunch Creek 0.710000 Mill Creek 0.137000 Pend Oreille River 74.099000 Slate Creek 0.378000 South Salmo River 4.662000 Sullivan Creek 0.208000 West Branch Le Clerc Creek 2.022000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Pend Oreille (12 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 94.037000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 12 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 334.802000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 30 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 12 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Olympic Peninsula CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES 0.566000 Big Creek 11.727000 Big Quilcene River 0.720000 Burg Slough 4.116000 Chehalis River 45.187000 Copalis River 1.026000 East Fork Humptulips River 15.691000 East Fork Siebert Creek 0.876000 Elwha River 0.151000 Ennis Creek 0.269000 Goodman Creek 1.107000 Hoh River 0.019000 Humptulips River 26.537000 Joe Creek 3.572000 Kalaloch Creek 2.011000 Moclips River 4.031000 Morse Creek 5.084000 Quinault River 0.021000 Raft River 0.697000 Siebert Creek 8.037000 Skokomish River 0.361000 Soleduck River 5.911000 Stevens Creek 12.894000 West Fork Humptulips River 29.944000 Willapa River 32.044000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 13 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Olympic Peninsula CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Wishkah River 33.526000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (26 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 246.125000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 26 CORE_AREA Dungeness NAME SumOfMILES Bear Creek 2.143000 Cameron Creek 0.691000 Canyon Creek 0.166000 Dungeness River 19.258000 Gold Creek 0.268000 Grand Creek 0.176000 Gray Wolf River 10.292000 Matriotti Creek 4.303000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Dungeness (8 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 37.297000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 8 CORE_AREA Elwha NAME SumOfMILES 0.782000 Boulder Creek 0.378000 Cat Creek 3.206000 Delabarre Creek 0.815000 Elwha River 43.122000 Godkin Creek 0.993000 Goldie River 5.808000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 14 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Olympic Peninsula CORE_AREA Elwha NAME SumOfMILES Hayes River 1.507000 Lillian River 1.805000 Little River 2.766000 Long Creek 2.009000 Lost River 0.571000 Prescott Creek 0.234000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Elwha (13 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 63.996000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 13 CORE_AREA Hoh NAME SumOfMILES 4.987000 Cedar Creek 1.765000 Cougar Creek 0.253000 Hoh Creek 0.495000 Hoh River 50.097000 Nolan Creek 1.107000 Slide Creek 0.809000 South Fork Hoh River 15.537000 Steamboat Creek 0.865000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Hoh (9 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 75.915000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 9 CORE_AREA Queets NAME SumOfMILES Clearwater River 30.472000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 15 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Olympic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES April-May 1969 2 THE WILD CASCADES MORE (BUT NOT THE LAST) ABOUT ALPINE LAKES We recently carried in these pages an article by Brock Evans, Northwest Conservation Representative, on Alpine Lakes: Stepchild of the North Cascades. Mr. L. O. Barrett, Supervisor of Snoqualmie National Forest, feels the article contained "some rather significant misinterpretations" and has asked the opportunity to respond. Following are Mr. Barrett's comments on portions of Mr. Evans' article, together with Mr. Evans' rejoinders. Barrett: The Alpine Lakes Area is still wilderness quality in part because of the nature of the land, and in part because the Forest Service has managed it as wilderness type area since 1946. We will continue to protect it from timber harvesting, mining and excessive recreation use until Congress makes a decision about its suitability for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Evans: The wilderness parts of the Alpine Lakes region that are being lost are those which the Forest Service has chosen not to manage as wilderness. The 1946 date referred to is the date of the establishment of the Alpine Lake Limited Area. This designation granted a measure of administrative protection to a substantial part of the region; but much was left out. The logging in the Miller River, Foss River, Deception Creek, Cooper Lake, and Eight Mile Creek valleys all took place in wilderness-type areas which we proposed for protection which were outside the limited area. The Forest Service cannot protect its lands from mineral prospecting or, ulti­ mately, from mining operations of some types — because of the mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand Density Conditions for Umatilla National Forest: a Range of Variation Analysis
    WHITE PAPER F14-SO-WP-SILV-50 Stand Density Conditions for Umatilla National Forest: A Range of Variation Analysis David C. Powell; Forest Silviculturist Supervisor’s Office; Pendleton, OR Initial Version: FEBRUARY 20131 Most Recent Revision: JUNE 2013 INTRODUCTION Umatilla National Forest adopted a program-of-work (POW) process in February 2013 involving three criteria: 1. Values at risk, including human infrastructure (Johnson 2013). 2. Subwatersheds where existing stand density exceeds a range of variation for stand density. 3. Unique habitats such as old-growth forests, aspen clones, riparian habitat conserva- tion areas, and meadows (Archuleta 2013). This white paper describes a process used to assess stand density conditions for Umatilla National Forest. A Forest-wide, stand-density assessment was completed to meet project planning needs associated with criterion #2 of a POW process. This assessment uses an analytical technique called the range of variation (RV), de- fined as a range of conditions likely to have occurred in the Blue Mountains prior to Euro-American settlement in mid-1800s. A white paper (WP Silv-3) provides concepts, principles, and methods relating to range of variation (Powell 2019) – that white paper provides more information about RV. Briefly, a stand-density assessment involved 4 steps: (1) compiling a dataset charac- terizing stand density conditions for Umatilla NF, (2) stratifying density data by biophysi- cal environment, (3) completing an RV analysis by using subwatersheds as landscape units, and (4) summarizing results while also accounting for land-use restrictions. 1 White papers are internal reports; they receive only limited review. Viewpoints expressed in this paper are those of the author – they may not represent positions of USDA Forest Service.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Touchet Endemic Summer Steelhead HGMP to NOAA Fisheries in 2010 for a Section 10(A)(1)(A) Permit
    WDFW Touchet River Endemic Stock Summer Steelhead - Touchet River Release HATCHERY AND GENETIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (HGMP) Hatchery Program: Mid-Columbia Summer Steelhead –Touchet River Stock: Lyons Ferry Hatchery Complex Species or Touchet River Endemic Summer Steelhead Hatchery Stock: Agency/Operator: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Watershed and Region: Touchet River / Walla Walla River / Mid- Columbia Basin, Washington State Date Submitted: April 20, 2002; November 29, 2010 Date Last Updated: November 6, 2015 WDFW - Touchet River Endemic Stock HGMP 1 Executive Summary ESA Permit Status: In 2010 the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) submitted a Hatchery Genetic Management Plan (HGMP) for the Lyons Ferry Hatchery (LFH) Touchet River Endemic Summer Steelhead 50,000 release of yearling smolts into the Touchet River program. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) are now re-submitting an HGMP for this yearling program to update the description of the current program. Both the Touchet River Endemic Summer Steelhead (O. Mykiss), Mid-Columbia ESU summer steelhead population, listed as threatened under the ESA as part of the Mid-Columbia River ESU (March 25, 1999; FR 64 No. 57: 14517-14528) and Wallowa Stock summer steelhead (O. Mykiss), (not ESA-listed) are currently produced at WDFW’s LFH and released into the Touchet River. This document covers only the Tucannon Endemic Steelhead program. The proposed hatchery program may slowly phase out the Wallowa stock from the Touchet River in the future. This will depend on the performance of the Touchet River endemic steelhead stock, and decisions reached with the co-managers for full implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 16. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit 447 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 16 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 16. Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit The Grande Ronde River CHU is essential to the conservation of bull trout because is supports strong bull trout populations and provides high-quality habitat to potentially expand bull trout distribution and is considered to be essential for bull trout recovery in the Mid-Columbia RU. The eleven populations in this CHU are spread over a large geographical area with multiple age classes, containing both resident and fluvial fish. This bull trout stronghold also has a prey base; connectivity with the Snake River; general distribution of bull trout throughout the habitat; and varying habitat conditions. But in several of the populations, including the Wenaha River, Lostine River, Lookingglass Creek, and Little Minam River populations, excellent habitat conditions exist; many streams and rivers are designated as Wild and Scenic Rivers and/or located within or near Wilderness areas. Two wilderness areas are designated within the Grande Ronde River basin. The Eagle Cap Wilderness is located in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, encompasses 146,272 (ha) (361,446 ac), and includes most of the Minam, upper Wallowa and Lostine river drainages as well as Bear Creek and Hurricane Creek and a small portion of Catherine Creek. Federal Wild and Scenic River status is designated for the Lostine and Minam Rivers and Oregon State Scenic Waterway status is designated to the Minam and Wallowa Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington by R.W. Tabor1 , R.A. Haugerud2, D.B. Booth3, and E.H. Brown4 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Olympia, Washington, 98504 OPEN FILE REPORT 94-403 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iu.S.G.S., Menlo Park, California 94025 2U.S.G.S., University of Washington, AJ-20, Seattle, Washington 98195 3SWMD, King County Department of Public Works, Seattle, Washington, 98104 ^Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 INTRODUCTION The Mount Baker 30- by 60-minute quadrangle encompasses rocks and structures that represent the essence of North Cascade geology. The quadrangle is mostly rugged and remote and includes much of the North Cascade National Park and several dedicated Wilderness areas managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Geologic exploration has been slow and difficult. In 1858 George Gibbs (1874) ascended the Skagit River part way to begin the geographic and geologic exploration of the North Cascades. In 1901, Reginald Daly (1912) surveyed the 49th parallel along the Canadian side of the border, and George Smith and Frank Calkins (1904) surveyed the United States' side. Daly's exhaustive report was the first attempt to synthesize what has become an extremely complicated geologic story.
    [Show full text]
  • 1New Olympic Sports
    SPORT_109.qxp_Layout 1 11/19/19 9:29 AM Page 109 2020WASHINGTONGUIDE Under Construction Washington’s Sports Scene Adds New and Improved Venues Site InSpections5 of Event-Ready Destinations The Evergreen Statelives up to its nickname with these SPG A Premier Travel Media publication awesome outdoor sights www.SportsPlanningGuide.com SPORT_110.qxp_Layout 1 11/22/19 2:15 PM Page 110 Ralph L. Morton Executive Director Seattle Sports Commission Within the state of Washington, pairings of professional and amateur sports, seascape and landscape, and arenas and outdoor complexes are uniquely highlighted. Our authentic brand encapsulates an innovative, passionate, sustainable community that embraces its beautiful natural environment and provides an ideal platform for launching new franchises and hosting premiere events. Award-winning restaurants and hotels provide hospitality to the loudest, most loyal fans in the country, selling out stadiums and enticing season tickets holders. We put the environment at the forefront of our operations, embracing sustainability in our sports complexes, businesses, communities, and way of life. Our stadiums boast incredible waste diversions rates, renewable energy sources, and carbon offsets. Washington is proud to showcase the best of Pacific Northwest culture as a welcoming, inclusive place with stunning, natural beauty and ever-improving infrastructure. Washington has a rich history in collegiate athletics, celebrating extraordinary achievements on the field, in the water, and on the court, continuously raising the bar for success at the Division I, II, and III levels. We are proud to add an NHL team as Seattle’s seventh sports franchise as the city seeks its 16th national championship honor, and continue to build a legacy in professional sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold and Fish Pamphlet: Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining
    WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Gold and Fish Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining May 2021 WDFW | 2020 GOLD and FISH - 2nd Edition Table of Contents Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining Rules 1 Agencies with an Interest in Mineral Prospecting 1 Definitions of Terms 8 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwater Without Timing Restrictions 12 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwaters With Timing Restrictions 14 Mineral Prospecting on Ocean Beaches 16 Authorized Work Times 17 Penalties 42 List of Figures Figure 1. High-banker 9 Figure 2. Mini high-banker 9 Figure 3. Mini rocker box (top view and bottom view) 9 Figure 4. Pan 10 Figure 5. Power sluice/suction dredge combination 10 Figure 6. Cross section of a typical redd 10 Fig u re 7. Rocker box (top view and bottom view) 10 Figure 8. Sluice 11 Figure 9. Spiral wheel 11 Figure 10. Suction dredge . 11 Figure 11. Cross section of a typical body of water, showing areas where excavation is not permitted under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 12. Permitted and prohibited excavation sites in a typical body of water under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 13. Limits on excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate on stream banks 14 Figure 14. Excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate within the wetted perimeter is not permitted 1 4 Figure 15. Cross section of a typical body of water showing unstable slopes, stable areas, and permissible or prohibited excavation sites under rules for mineral prospecting with timing restrictions Dashed lines indicates areas where excavation is not permitted 15 Figure 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 12-1986 Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation California Regional Water Quality Control Board, "Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2)" (1986). California Agencies. Paper 393. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/393 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATER QUA~ITY · CONTROL PLAN Cover photo by: MICHAEL DRENNAN. Senior Water Resources Engineer San Francisco Bay Region DONALD E. ANDERSON, CHAIRMAN PETER W. SNYDER, VICE CHAIRMAN* FRED KLATTE* JANICE E. MONDAVI MARION OTSEA • KENNETH R. MERCER JEPTHA WADE PHILIP WENTE *Basin Plan Committee 1986 3 F N R R This report was prepared under the direction of Roger B. James ......................................................................... Executive Officer Lawrence P. Kolb ...................................................................... Assistant Executive Officer Richard H. Whitsel ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Umatilla National Forest
    Umatilla - 2001 Monitoring Report Umatilla National Forest FOREST SUPERVISOR OFFICE 2517 SW Hailey Avenue Pendleton, Oregon 97801 (541) 278-3716 Jeff D. Blackwood, Forest Supervisor ---------- HEPPNER RANGER DISTRICT P.O. Box 7 Heppner, Oregon 97836 (541) 676-9187 Andrei Rykoff, District Ranger NORTH FORK JOHN DAY RANGER DISTRICT P.O. Box 158 Ukiah, Oregon 97880 (541) 427-3231 Craig Smith-Dixon, District Ranger POMEROY RANGER DISTRICT 71 West Main Pomeroy, Washington 99347 (509) 843-1891 Monte Fujishin, District Ranger WALLA WALLA RANGER DISTRICT 1415 West Rose Street Walla Walla, Washington 99362 (509) 522-6290 Mary Gibson, District Ranger U-1 Umatilla - 2001 Monitoring Report U-2 Umatilla - 2001 Monitoring Report SECTION U Table of Contents Page MONITORING ITEMS NOT REPORTED THIS YEAR.....................................................................U- 4 FOREST PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR FY2001................................................................................U- 4 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTIONS ..................................................................................U- 5 FOREST PLAN MONITORING ITEMS Item 3 Water Quantity .........................................................................................................U-10 Item 4 Water Quality............................................................................................................U-12 Item 5 Stream Temperature ................................................................................................U-15 Item 6 Stream Sedimentation..............................................................................................U-20
    [Show full text]
  • 443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards
    Environmental Protection Agency § 131.33 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated of streams located in Indian country, Water Quality Standards or as may be modified by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region X, pursu- § 131.31 Arizona. ant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, ° (a) [Reserved] a temperature criterion of 10 C, ex- (b) The following waters have, in ad- pressed as an average of daily max- dition to the uses designated by the imum temperatures over a seven-day State, the designated use of fish con- period, applies to the waterbodies iden- sumption as defined in R18–11–101 tified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (which is available from the Arizona during the months of June, July, Au- Department of Environmental Quality, gust and September. Water Quality Division, 3033 North (2) The following waters are pro- Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012): tected for bull trout spawning and rearing: COLORADO MAIN STEM RIVER (i) BOISE-MORE BASIN: Devils BASIN: Creek, East Fork Sheep Creek, Sheep Hualapai Wash MIDDLE GILA RIVER BASIN: Creek. Agua Fria River (Camelback Road to (ii) BROWNLEE RESERVOIR BASIN: Avondale WWTP) Crooked River, Indian Creek. Galena Gulch (iii) CLEARWATER BASIN: Big Can- Gila River (Felix Road to the Salt yon Creek, Cougar Creek, Feather River) Creek, Laguna Creek, Lolo Creek, Queen Creek (Headwaters to the Su- Orofino Creek, Talapus Creek, West perior WWTP) Fork Potlatch River. Queen Creek (Below Potts Canyon) (iv) COEUR D’ALENE LAKE BASIN: SAN PEDRO RIVER BASIN: Cougar Creek, Fernan Creek, Kid Copper Creek Creek, Mica Creek, South Fork Mica SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN: Creek, Squaw Creek, Turner Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California
    Becker Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Resources South of the Golden Gate, California October 2008 Gordon S. Becker #ENTERFOR%COSYSTEM-ANAGEMENT2ESTORATION Isabelle J. Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Cartography by David A. Asbury Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy and The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Resources South of the Golden Gate, California The mission of the Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration is to make effective use of scientific information to promote the restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems. The Center is a not-for-profit corporation, and contributions in support of its programs are tax-deductible. Center for Ecosystem Management & Restoration 4179 Piedmont Ave, Suite 325, Oakland, CA 94611 Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 510.420.4565 http://www.cemar.org CEMAR The cover image is a map of the watershed area of streams tributary to the Pacific Ocean south of the Golden Gate, California, by CEMAR. The image above is a 1934 Gazos Creek stream survey report published by the California Division of Fish and Game. Book design by Audrey Kallander. Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Gordon S. Becker Isabelle J. Reining Cartography by David A. Asbury This report should be cited as: Becker, G.S. and I.J. Reining. 2008. Steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) resources south of the Golden Gate, California. Cartography by D.A. Asbury. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration. Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward pg. 3 Introduction pg.
    [Show full text]