443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards Environmental Protection Agency § 131.33 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated of streams located in Indian country, Water Quality Standards or as may be modified by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region X, pursu- § 131.31 Arizona. ant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, ° (a) [Reserved] a temperature criterion of 10 C, ex- (b) The following waters have, in ad- pressed as an average of daily max- dition to the uses designated by the imum temperatures over a seven-day State, the designated use of fish con- period, applies to the waterbodies iden- sumption as defined in R18–11–101 tified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (which is available from the Arizona during the months of June, July, Au- Department of Environmental Quality, gust and September. Water Quality Division, 3033 North (2) The following waters are pro- Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012): tected for bull trout spawning and rearing: COLORADO MAIN STEM RIVER (i) BOISE-MORE BASIN: Devils BASIN: Creek, East Fork Sheep Creek, Sheep Hualapai Wash MIDDLE GILA RIVER BASIN: Creek. Agua Fria River (Camelback Road to (ii) BROWNLEE RESERVOIR BASIN: Avondale WWTP) Crooked River, Indian Creek. Galena Gulch (iii) CLEARWATER BASIN: Big Can- Gila River (Felix Road to the Salt yon Creek, Cougar Creek, Feather River) Creek, Laguna Creek, Lolo Creek, Queen Creek (Headwaters to the Su- Orofino Creek, Talapus Creek, West perior WWTP) Fork Potlatch River. Queen Creek (Below Potts Canyon) (iv) COEUR D’ALENE LAKE BASIN: SAN PEDRO RIVER BASIN: Cougar Creek, Fernan Creek, Kid Copper Creek Creek, Mica Creek, South Fork Mica SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN: Creek, Squaw Creek, Turner Creek. Agua Caliente Wash (v) HELLS CANYON BASIN: Dry Nogales Wash Creek, East Fork Sheep Creek, Getta Sonoita Creek (Above the town of Creek, Granite Creek, Kurry Creek, Patagonia) Little Granite Creek, Sheep Creek. Tanque Verde Creek (vi) LEMHI BASIN: Adams Creek, Tinaja Wash Alder Creek, Basin Creek, Bear Valley Davidson Canyon Creek, Big Eightmile Creek, Big UPPER GILA RIVER BASIN Springs Creek, Big Timber Creek, Bray Chase Creek Creek, Bull Creek, Cabin Creek, Can- (c) To implement the requirements of yon Creek, Carol Creek, Chamberlain R18–11–108.A.5 with respect to effects of Creek, Clear Creek, Climb Creek, Coo- mercury on wildlife, EPA (or the State per Creek, Dairy Creek, Deer Creek, with the approval of EPA) shall imple- Deer Park Creek, East Fork Hayden ment a monitoring program to assess Creek, Eighteenmile Creek, Falls attainment of the water quality stand- Creek, Ferry Creek, Ford Creek, ard. Geertson Creek, Grove Creek, Hawley Creek, Hayden Creek, Kadletz Creek, (Sec. 303, Federal Water Pollution Control Kenney Creek, Kirtley Creek, Lake Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1313, 86 Stat. 816 Creek, Lee Creek, Lemhi River (above et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; Clean Water Act, Pub. L. 92–500, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) Big Eightmile Creek), Little Eightmile Creek, Little Mill Creek, Little Timber [41 FR 25000, June 22, 1976; 41 FR 48737, Nov. Creek, Middle Fork Little Timber 5, 1976. Redesignated and amended at 42 FR 56740, Oct. 28, 1977. Further redesignated and Creek, Milk Creek, Mill Creek, Mogg amended at 48 FR 51408, Nov. 8, 1983; 61 FR Creek, North Fork Kirtley Creek, 20693, May 7, 1996; 68 FR 62744, Nov. 6, 2003] North Fork Little Timber Creek, Para- dise Creek, Patterson Creek, Payne § 131.32 [Reserved] Creek, Poison Creek, Prospect Creek, Rocky Creek, Short Creek, Squaw § 131.33 Idaho. Creek, Squirrel Creek, Tobias Creek, (a) Temperature criteria for bull trout. Trail Creek, West Fork Hayden Creek, (1) Except for those streams or portions Wright Creek. 443 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:42 Jul 25, 2013 Jkt 229169 PO 00000 Frm 00453 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\229169.XXX 229169 ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with CFR § 131.33 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–13 Edition) (vii) LITTLE LOST BASIN: Badger Polar Creek, Postoffice Creek, Queen Creek, Barney Creek, Bear Canyon, Creek, Robin Creek, Rock Creek, Rye Bear Creek, Bell Mountain Creek, Big Patch Creek, Sardine Creek, Shoot Creek, Bird Canyon, Black Creek, Buck Creek, Shotgun Creek, Skookum Canyon, Bull Creek, Cedar Run Creek, Creek, Snowshoe Creek, South Fork Chicken Creek, Coal Creek, Corral Spruce Creek, South Fork Storm Creek, Deep Creek, Dry Creek, Dry Creek, Split Creek, Sponge Creek, Creek Canal, Firbox Creek, Garfield Spring Creek, Spruce Creek, Squaw Creek, Hawley Canyon, Hawley Creek, Creek, Storm Creek, Tick Creek, Tom- Horse Creek, Horse Lake Creek, Iron cat Creek, Tumble Creek, Twin Creek, Creek, Jackson Creek, Little Lost Wag Creek, Walde Creek, Walton River (above Badger Creek), Mahogany Creek, Warm Springs Creek, Weir Creek, Main Fork Sawmill Creek, Mas- Creek, Wendover Creek, West Fork sacre Creek, Meadow Creek, Mill Boulder Creek, West Fork Papoose Creek, Moffett Creek, Moonshine Creek, West Fork Squaw Creek, West Creek, Quigley Creek, Red Rock Creek, Fork Wendover Creek, White Sands Sands Creek, Sawmill Creek, Slide Creek, Willow Creek. Creek, Smithie Fork, Squaw Creek, (x) LOWER CLARK FORK BASIN: Summerhouse Canyon, Summit Creek, Cascade Creek, East Fork, East Fork Timber Creek, Warm Creek, Wet Creek, Creek, East Forkast Fork Creek, Gold Williams Creek. Creek, Johnson Creek, Lightning (viii) LITTLE SALMON BASIN: Creek, Mosquito Creek, Porcupine Bascum Canyon, Boulder Creek, Brown Creek, Rattle Creek, Spring Creek, Creek, Campbell Ditch, Castle Creek, Twin Creek, Wellington Creek. Copper Creek, Granite Fork Lake Fork (xi) LOWER KOOTENAI BASIN: Ball Rapid River, Hard Creek, Hazard Creek, Boundary Creek, Brush Creek, Creek, Lake Fork Rapid River, Little Cabin Creek, Caribou Creek, Cascade Salmon River (above Hazard Creek), Creek, Cooks Creek, Cow Creek, Curley Paradise Creek, Pony Creek, Rapid Creek, Deep Creek, Grass Creek, Jim River, Squirrel Creek, Trail Creek, Creek, Lime Creek, Long Canyon West Fork Rapid River. Creek, Mack Creek, Mission Creek, (ix) LOCHSA BASIN: Apgar Creek, Myrtle Creek, Peak Creek, Snow Badger Creek, Bald Mountain Creek, Creek, Trout Creek. Beaver Creek, Big Flat Creek, Big Stew (xii) LOWER MIDDLE FORK SALM- Creek, Boulder Creek, Brushy Fork, ON BASIN: Acorn Creek, Alpine Creek, Cabin Creek, Castle Creek, Chain Anvil Creek, Arrastra Creek, Bar Creek, Cliff Creek, Coolwater Creek, Creek, Beagle Creek, Beaver Creek, Cooperation Creek, Crab Creek, Crook- Belvidere Creek, Big Creek, Birdseye ed Fork Lochsa River, Dan Creek, Creek, Boulder Creek, Brush Creek, Deadman Creek, Doe Creek, Dutch Buck Creek, Bull Creek, Cabin Creek, Creek, Eagle Creek, East Fork Papoose Camas Creek, Canyon Creek, Castle Creek, East Fork Split Creek, East Creek, Clark Creek, Coin Creek, Corner Fork Squaw Creek, Eel Creek, Fern Creek, Coxey Creek, Crooked Creek, Creek, Fire Creek, Fish Creek, Fish Doe Creek, Duck Creek, East Fork Lake Creek, Fox Creek, Gass Creek, Holy Terror Creek, Fawn Creek, Flume Gold Creek, Ham Creek, Handy Creek, Creek, Fly Creek, Forge Creek, Fur- Hard Creek, Haskell Creek, Heather nace Creek, Garden Creek, Government Creek, Hellgate Creek, Holly Creek, Creek, Grouse Creek, Hammer Creek, Hopeful Creek, Hungery Creek, Indian Hand Creek, Holy Terror Creek, J Fell Grave Creek, Jay Creek, Kerr Creek, Creek, Jacobs Ladder Creek, Lewis Kube Creek, Lochsa River, Lone Knob Creek, Liberty Creek, Lick Creek, Creek, Lottie Creek, Macaroni Creek, Lime Creek, Little Jacket Creek, Lit- Maud Creek, Middle Fork Clearwater tle Marble Creek, Little White Goat River, No-see-um Creek, North Fork Creek, Little Woodtick Creek, Logan Spruce Creek, North Fork Storm Creek, Lookout Creek, Loon Creek, Creek, Nut Creek, Otter Slide Creek, Martindale Creek, Meadow Creek, Mid- Pack Creek, Papoose Creek, Parachute dle Fork Smith Creek, Monumental Creek, Pass Creek, Pedro Creek, Pell Creek, Moore Creek, Mulligan Creek, Creek, Pete King Creek, Placer Creek, North Fork Smith Creek, Norton 444 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:42 Jul 25, 2013 Jkt 229169 PO 00000 Frm 00454 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\229169.XXX 229169 ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with CFR Environmental Protection Agency § 131.33 Creek, Placer Creek, Pole Creek, Rams Schwar Creek, Matteson Creek, Mead- Creek, Range Creek, Routson Creek, ow Creek, Monument Creek, Moose Rush Creek, Sawlog Creek, Sheep Creek, Moss Creek, Newsome Creek, Creek, Sheldon Creek, Shellrock Creek, North Fork Moose Creek, Rhoda Creek, Ship Island Creek, Shovel Creek, Silver Saddle Creek, Schwar Creek, Shake Creek, Smith Creek, Snowslide Creek, Creek, Spook Creek, Spur Creek, Tam- Soldier Creek, South Fork Camas arack Creek, West Fork Anderson Creek, South Fork Chamberlain Creek, Creek, West Fork Gedney Creek, West South Fork Holy Terror Creek, South Moose Creek, Wounded Doe Creek. Fork Norton Creek, South Fork Rush (xvi) MIDDLE FORK CLEARWATER Creek, South Fork Sheep Creek, Spider BASIN: Baldy Creek, Big Cedar Creek, Creek, Spletts Creek, Telephone Creek, Browns Spring Creek, Clear Creek, Trail Creek, Two Point Creek, West Middle Fork Clear Creek, Pine Knob Fork Beaver Creek, West Fork Camas Creek, South Fork Clear Creek. Creek, West Fork Monumental Creek, (xvii) MIDDLE FORK PAYETTE West Fork Rush Creek, White Goat BASIN: Bull Creek, Middle Fork Creek, Wilson Creek. Payette River (above Fool Creek), Ox- (xiii) LOWER NORTH FORK CLEAR- tail Creek, Silver Creek, Sixteen-to- WATER BASIN: Adair Creek, Badger one Creek. Creek, Bathtub Creek, Beaver Creek, (xviii) MIDDLE SALMON-CHAM- Black Creek, Brush Creek, Buck Creek, BERLAIN BASIN: Arrow Creek, Butte Creek, Canyon Creek, Caribou Bargamin Creek, Bat Creek, Bay Creek, Crimper Creek, Dip Creek, Dog Creek, Bear
Recommended publications
  • Initial Assessment of Water Resources in Cobre Valley, Arizona
    Initial Assessment of Water Resources in Cobre Valley, Arizona Introduction 2 Overview of Cobre Valley 3 CLIMATE 3 TOPOGRAPHY 3 GROUNDWATER 3 SURFACE WATER 4 POPULATION 5 ECONOMY 7 POLLUTION AND CONTAMINATION 8 Status of Municipal Water Resources 10 GLOBE, AZ 10 MIAMI, AZ 12 TRI-CITIES (CLAYPOOL, CENTRAL HEIGHTS, MIDLAND CITY) AND UNINCORPORATED AREAS 15 Water Resources Uncertainty and Potential 18 INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING 18 SUSTAINABLE WELLFIELDS AND ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLIES 19 PRIVATE WELL WATER SUPPLY AND WATER QUALITY 20 PUBLIC EDUCATION 20 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 21 References 23 Appendices 25 1. ARIZONA WATER COMPANY VS CITY OF GLOBE LAWSUIT 25 2. AGENT ORANGE APPLICATION IN THE 1960s 26 3. INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES IN THE CITY OF GLOBE 27 Initial Assessment of Water Resources in Cobre Valley, Arizona 1 Introduction This initial assessment of water resources in the Cobre Valley provides a snapshot of available data and resources on various water-related topics from all known sources. This report is the first step in determining where data are lacking and what further investigation may be necessary for community planning and resource development purposes. The research has been driven by two primary questions: 1) What information and resources currently exist on water resources in Cobre Valley and 2) what further research is necessary to provide valuable and accurate information so that community members and decision makers can reach their long-term water resource management goals? Areas of investigation include: water supply, water quality, drought and floods, economic factors, and water-dependent environmental values. Research for this report was conducted through the systematic collection of data and information from numerous local, state, and federal sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona
    DIGITAL GEOLOGIC MAP DGM-80 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHINO VALLEY NORTH 7½’ QUADRANGLE, YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA, V. 1.0 Brian. F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer and Joseph P. Cook December 2010 ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona by Brian F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer, and Joe P. Cook Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map DGM-80 version 1.0 December, 2010 Scale 1:24,000 (1 sheet, with text) Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award no. 08HQAG0093. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Discussion ................................................................................................................... 3 Quaternary faulting ...........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • R-17-76 Meeting 17-15 June 28, 2017 AGENDA ITEM 15 AGENDA ITEM
    R-17-76 Meeting 17-15 June 28, 2017 AGENDA ITEM 15 AGENDA ITEM Amendment to the La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve Master Plan to include One Proposed New Trail Loop and New Trail Names for the Preserve GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve an amendment to the La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve Master Plan to add a one-mile trail loop; 2. Approve the following trail names: “Harrington Creek Trail” for the main ranch road in lower La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve; “Folger Ranch Loop Trail” for a new loop trail off the main ranch road; “Coho Vista Trail” for the existing trail to the vista point in upper La Honda Creek; and “Cielo Trail” for an existing trail leading to the Redwood Cabin area. SUMMARY Phase I implementation of the La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve (OSP) Master Plan includes opening the Sears Ranch Road Parking Area, establishing the main Driscoll Ranch road in lower La Honda Creek as a hiking and equestrian trail, and providing permit-only equestrian parking at the former Event Center. The General Manager recommends adding an additional one-mile segment of an existing ranch road to the Phase I Trails Plan, to provide a seasonal loop opportunity, as an amendment to the Master Plan. In preparation for the opening of the Preserve, the General Manager also recommends new trail names for lower and upper La Honda Creek. The proposed trail names for lower La Honda Creek are: “Harrington Creek Trail” for the main ranch road and “Folger Ranch Trail” for the new loop.
    [Show full text]
  • (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No
    December 2011 FACT SHEET Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No. NN0030335 Applicant address: Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (“NTUA”) P.O. Box 587 Fort Defiance, Arizona 86504 Applicant Contact: Harry L. Begaye, Technical Assistant (928) 729-6208 Facility Address: 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School West of Black Creek Wash in Navajo, NM Facility Contact: Philemon Allison, District Manager (928) 729-6140 I. Summary The NTUA was issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit (No. NN0030335) on December 23, 2006, for its Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoon facility (“WWTF”), pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) regulations set forth in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 122.21. The permit was effective December 23, 2006, through midnight, December 22, 2011. NTUA applied to U.S. EPA Region 9 for reissuance on August 16, 2011. This fact sheet is based on information provided by the applicant through its application and discharge data submittal, along with the appropriate laws and regulations. Pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the U.S. EPA is proposing issuance of the NPDES permit renewal to NTUA Navajo Townsite (“permittee”) for the discharge of treated domestic wastewater to receiving waters named Black Creek, a tributary to Puerco River, an eventual tributary to the Little Colorado River, a water of the United States. II. Description of Facility The NTUA Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoons are located 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School, west of Black Creek Wash in Navajo New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Stratigraphy of the Defiance Plateau, Arizona H
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/18 Permian stratigraphy of the Defiance Plateau, Arizona H. Wesley Peirce, 1967, pp. 57-62 in: Defiance, Zuni, Mt. Taylor Region (Arizona and New Mexico), Trauger, F. D.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 18th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 228 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1967 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN GREGORIO CREEK STREAM SYSTEM ) 12 ) in San Mateo County, California ) 13 ------) 14
    (ENDORSED) 1 WILLIAM R. ATTWATER, Chief Counsel ANDREW H. SAWYER, Assistant Chief Counsel 2 M. G. TAYLOR, III, Senior Staff Counsel FILED • BARBARA A. KATZ, Staff Counsel JAN 2 9 1993 3 901 P Street WARREN SLOCUM, County C!cri( Sacramento, California 95814 j:,\!l;.l"'if' ",.,;;."""" ''­ :':y , J:.;i";J 1 "~1."""....ii, ..': .. ;• .'.~ 4 Telephone: (916) 657 -209 7 • C'EPu;Y C~:~~~~ 5 Attorneys for the State Water Resources Control Board 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 9 In the Matter of the ) No. 355792 Determination of the Rights of ) 10 the various Claimants to the ) DECREE Water of ) 11 ) SAN GREGORIO CREEK STREAM SYSTEM ) 12 ) in San Mateo County, California ) 13 ------------------------------) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 • 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................. i . , , 4 INDEX OF CLAIMANTS ........................................... iii " 5 Defini tions ............................................. 2 6 State Water Resources Control Board Map ................. 4 7 General. Entitlement ..................................... 4 8 Priori ty of Rights ...................................... 5 9 Post-1914 Appropriations ................................ 6 10 Seasons of Use .......................................... 7 11 Domestic Use ............................................ 7 12 S tockwa tering Use ....................................... 7 13 Irrigation Use .......................................... 8 14 Domestic and Stockwatering Uses During
    [Show full text]
  • MAA 5 Year Approved Projects List FY 2018‐19 Through FY 2022‐23
    Attachment 5 MAA 5 Year Approved Projects List FY 2018‐19 through FY 2022‐23 MAA Portfolio No. Project Name Project Description AA01‐ Miramontes Ridge: Replace current interior bridge with bridge or culvert crossing. The Madonna Bridge Gateway to the Coast Public Access, Stream current bridge is weight limited and does not allow for emergency Replacement Restoration and Agriculture Enhancement vehicle access. Investigate and implement alternative water supply at Madonna Creek AA01‐ Miramontes Ridge: Water Infrastructure Ranch to replace agricultural water currently provided through in‐ Gateway to the Coast Public Access, Stream Development stream impoundment on steelhead fisheries stream. Develop and Restoration and Agriculture Enhancement implement restoration plans for Madonna Creek. AA01‐ Miramontes Ridge: Pursue Land Conservation Purchase uplands portion of Johnston Ranch from POST as an addition Gateway to the Coast Public Access, Stream Opportunities to the Miramontes Ridge Open Space Preserve. Restoration and Agriculture Enhancement AA01‐ Miramontes Ridge: Pursue Public Access Pursue partnerships with other public agencies to improve public Gateway to the Coast Public Access, Stream Partnerships with Other access and preserve scenic open space in Miramontes Ridge Open Restoration and Agriculture Enhancement Public Agencies Space Preserve. Work with partners to purchase or otherwise secure public access AA02‐ Regional: Bayfront Habitat Protection Pursue Land Conservation rights on remaining properties needed to close gaps on the San and Public Access Partnerships Opportunities Francisco Bay Trail in the vicinity of Ravenswood Open Space Preserve. Cooley Landing ‐ AA02‐ Regional: Bayfront Habitat Protection New interpretative facilities, infrastructure, and signage related to Interpretative Facilities & and Public Access Partnerships Cooley Landing Park. Infrastructure Secure and record trail easement.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall-Runoff Model for Black Creek Watershed, Navajo Nation
    Rainfall-Runoff Model for Black Creek Watershed, Navajo Nation Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Tecle, Aregai; Heinrich, Paul; Leeper, John; Tallsalt-Robertson, Jolene Publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest Rights Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Download date 25/09/2021 20:12:23 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/301297 37 RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL FOR BLACK CREEK WATERSHED, NAVAJO NATION Aregai Tecle1, Paul Heinrich1, John Leeper2, and Jolene Tallsalt-Robertson2 ABSTRACT This paper develops a rainfall-runoff model for estimating surface and peak flow rates from precipitation storm events on the Black Creek watershed in the Navajo Nation. The Black Creek watershed lies in the southern part of the Navajo Nation between the Defiance Plateau on the west and the Chuska Mountains on the east. The area is in the semiarid part of the Colorado Plateau on which there is about 10 inches of precipitation a year. We have two main purposes for embarking on the study. One is to determine the amount of runoff and peak flow rate generated from rainfall storm events falling on the 655 square mile watershed and the second is to provide the Navajo Nation with a method for estimating water yield and peak flow in the absence of adequate data. Two models, Watershed Modeling System (WMS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) Hydrological Modeling System (HMS) that have Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities are used to generate stream hydrographs. Figure 1. Physiographic map of the Navajo Nation with the Chuska The latter show peak flow rates and total amounts of Mountain and Deance Plateau and Stream Gaging Stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Vol. 1
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 Community Community Name Number SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 040090 NOGALES, CITY OF 040091 PATAGONIA, TOWN OF 040092 Santa Cruz County EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 2, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 04023CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS report may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Report Effective Date: December 2, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • <PRORULE> <PREAMB> DEPARTMENT
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/25/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-01303, and on FDsys.gov <PRORULE> <PREAMB> DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0101] [4500030113] RIN 1018–AY25 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for the Zuni Bluehead Sucker AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to list the Zuni bluehead sucker as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act and propose to designate critical habitat for the species. If we finalize this rule as proposed, it would extend the Act’s protections to this subspecies and its critical habitat. The effect of these regulations will be to conserve the Zuni bluehead sucker and protect its habitat under the Act. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS–R2–ES–2012–0101, which is the docket number for this rulemaking.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Formation of Fluvial Islands
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Joshua R. Wyrick for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering presented on March 31, 2005. Title: On the Formation of Fluvial Islands Abstract approved: Signature redacted for privacy. Peter C. Klingeman This research analyzes the effects of islands on river process and the effects river processes have on island formation. A fluvial island is defined herein as a land mass within a river channel that is separated from the floodplain by water on all sides, exhibits some stability, and remains exposed during bankfull flow. Fluvial islands are present in nearly all major rivers. They must therefore have some impact on the fluid mechanics of the system, and yet there has never been a detailed study on fluvial islands.Islands represent a more natural state of a river system and have been shown to provide hydrologic variability and biotic diversity for the river. This research describes the formation of fluvial islands, investigates the formation of fluvial islands experimentally, determines the main relations between fluvial islands and river processes, compares and describes relationships between fluvial islands and residual islands found in megaflood outwash plains, and reaches conclusions regarding island shape evolution and flow energy loss optimization. Fluvial islands are known to form by at least nine separate processes: avulsion, gradual degradation of channel branches, lateral shifts in channel position, stabilization of a bar or riffle, isolation of structural features, rapid incision of flood deposits, sediment deposition in the lee of an obstacle, isolation of material deposited by mass movement, and isolation of riparian topography after the installation of a dam.
    [Show full text]