DOCSLIB.ORG

Catch Record Cards & Codes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catch Record Cards & Codes Catch Record Cards Catch Record Card Codes The Catch Record Card is an important management tool for estimating the recreational catch of PUGET SOUND REGION sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness crab. A catch record card must be REMINDER! 824 Baker River 724 Dakota Creek (Whatcom Co.) 770 McAllister Creek (Thurston Co.) 814 Salt Creek (Clallam Co.) 874 Stillaguamish River, South Fork in your possession to fish for these species. Washington Administrative Code (WAC 220-56-175, WAC 825 Baker Lake 726 Deep Creek (Clallam Co.) 778 Minter Creek (Pierce/Kitsap Co.) 816 Samish River 832 Suiattle River 220-69-236) requires all kept sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness Return your Catch Record Cards 784 Berry Creek 728 Deschutes River 782 Morse Creek (Clallam Co.) 828 Sauk River 854 Sultan River crab to be recorded on your Catch Record Card, and requires all anglers to return their fish Catch by the date printed on the card 812 Big Quilcene River 732 Dewatto River 786 Nisqually River 818 Sekiu River 878 Tahuya River Record Card by April 30, or for Dungeness crab by the date indicated on the card, even if nothing “With or Without Catch” 748 Big Soos Creek 734 Dosewallips River 794 Nooksack River (below North Fork) 830 Skagit River 856 Tokul Creek is caught or you did not fish. Please use the instruction sheet issued with your card. Please return 708 Burley Creek (Kitsap Co.) 736 Duckabush River 790 Nooksack River, North Fork 834 Skokomish River (Mason Co.) 858 Tolt River Catch Record Cards to: WDFW CRC Unit, PO Box 43142, Olympia WA 98504-3142. Use examples Send to: 710 California Creek 738 Dungeness River 788 Nooksack River, Middle Fork 844 Skykomish River (below forks) 880 Union River below to help complete your card correctly. Do Not Record Released Catch. For Catch Record Card WDFW CRC Unit, PO Box 43142, Olympia, 866 Canyon Creek (Stillaguamish Sys.) 746 Green/Duwamish River (King Co.) 792 Nooksack River, South Fork 846 Skykomish River, North Fork 860 Wallace River 727 Capitol Lake 752 Hoko River 870 Pilchuck Creek (Stillaguamish Sys.) 848 Skykomish River, South Fork 884 Whatcom Creek Information call (360) 902-2707. WA 98504-3142 802 Carbon River 754 Kennedy Creek 840 Pilchuck River (Snohomish Sys.) 850 Snohomish River 808 White (Stuck) River For catch area codes, refer to the next page or the instruction sheet received with your catch 826 Cascade River 763 Lake Sammamish 804 Puyallup River 852 Snoqualmie River 862 Woods Creek record card, or refer to the Westside and Eastside rivers special rules sections within this pamphlet. 714 Chambers Creek 762 Lake Washington 810 Pysht River 748 Soos Creek (Big Soos Creek) 718 Clallam River 766 Little Quilcene River 812 Quilcene River (Big Quilcene River) 876 Stillaguamish River (below forks) Immediately after retaining the species below and before fishing again, record catch information in ink. 722 Curley Creek (Kitsap Co.) 768 Lyre River 842 Raging River 872 Stillaguamish River, North Fork Did you fish for Sturgeon? ____X Yes ____No Did you fish for Salmon? ____X Yes ____No COLUMBIA RIVER REGION STURGEON SALMON 501 Abernathy Creek 535 Columbia R. I-182 Br. to Old 586 Entiat River 559 Lake Scanewa (Reservoir) 648 Snake R. Lower Granite to WA/ Do Not Record Released Sturgeon Do Not Record Released Salmon 508 Big White Salmon River Hanford townsite towers 589 Germany Creek 670 Lake Wenatchee ID state line, Clarkston 507 Blue Creek (Lewis Co.) 536 Columbia R. Old Hanford townsite 556 Goble Creek 611 Lewis River (below East Fork) 650 Snake R. upstream of the WA/ A 50" white sturgeon kept from CATCH AREA MO DAY SPECIES FORK A 19" Chinook salmon CATCH Check One Box Per Line For Species Kept CODE (1-12) (1-31) CODE LENGTH MO DAY CLIP 609 Cedar Creek (Clark Co.) towers to Priest Rapids 592 Grande Ronde River 613 Lewis River, East Fork ID state line, Clarkston Columbia River below The Dalles Dam kept from the Cowlitz AREA CODE (1-12) (1-31) CHIN COHO CHUM PINK SOCK CHIN COHO TYPE 552 Chelan River 537 Columbia R. Priest Rapids 594 Grays River mouth to 615 Lewis River, North Fork 571 Tilton River on January 15 with a vent behind 527 1 15 W 50 River below Mayfield JACK JACK 515 Chinook River to Wanapum Dam Barr Rd. Bridge 661 Little Washougal River 657 Touchet River pelvic fins, would be entered as: Dam on Sept. 15 with 555 Cispus River 539 Columbia R. Wanapum 595 Grays River Barr Rd. 563 Mayfield Lake (Reservoir) 573 Toutle River (below forks) clipped adipose fin Species Codes: 561 9 15 H W 517 Coal Creek (Cowlitz Co.) to Rock Island Dam Bridge to South Fork 621 Methow River 575 Toutle River, No. Fork would be entered as: 519 Columbia R. Buoy 10 to 541 Columbia R. Rock Island 596 Grays River, West Fork 624 Mill Creek (Cowlitz Co.) 577 Toutle River, So. Fork W = White Sturgeon (barbels near snout tip, vent behind pelvic fins) H = Hatchery (adipose fin clipped and a healed scar at the location of the clipped fin) Rocky Pt.-Tongue Pt. line to Rocky Reach Dam 597 Grays River, East Fork 625 Mill Creek (Lewis Co.) 653 Tucannon River Green Sturgeon May Not Be fished for or Retained 521 Columbia R. Rocky Pt.-Tongue 543 Columbia R. Rocky 565 Green R. (Cowlitz Co.) mouth 627 Okanogan River 659 Walla Walla River W = Wild (adipose fin intact) Green Sturgeon (barbels near mouth, vent between pelvic fins) Pt. line to Longview Br. Reach to Wells Dam to Toutle Hatchery rack site 569 Olequa Creek (Lewis Co.) 667 Washougal River mouth to Marine Areas and Adults in Freshwater 523 Columbia R. Longview Br. to I-5 Br. 545 Columbia R. Wells to 566 Green R. (Cowlitz Co.) Toutle 652 Palouse River (Whitman Co.) WDFW Co. Line Access Site CHIN = Chinook/King CHUM = Chum/Dog SOCK = Sockeye/Red 525 Columbia R. I-5 Br. to Chief Joseph Dam Hatchery rack site upstream 632 Rock Creek (Skamania Co.) 668 Washougal River WDFW Co. White Location of vent Green COHO = Coho/Silver PINK = Pink/Humpy Bonneville Dam 557 Coweeman River 598 Hamilton Creek 549 Roosevelt Lake (Lake Roosevelt) Line Access Site upstream 527 Columbia R. Bonneville 561 Cowlitz R. below Mayfield Dam 672 Icicle River (Creek) 635 Salmon Creek (Clark Co.) 665 Washougal River, North Jacks in Freshwater, Willapa Bay (area 2-1) and Grays Harbor (area 2-2). Immediately after retaining a white sturgeon and before fishing again, record catch information to The Dalles Dam 559 Cowlitz R. above Cowlitz Falls 604 Kalama River mouth to 629 Similkameen River and West Forks in ink. The annual limit is 2 fish, even if an angler possesses both a Washington and an Oregon CHIN JACK = King jacks or Chinook jacks (12 to less than 24 inches) 529 Columbia R. The Dalles Dam and Lake Scanewa Modrow Bridge 638 Skamokawa Creek 674 Wenatchee River license and catch record card. After an annual limit has been retained, catch-and-release fishing COHO JACK = Silver jacks or Coho jacks (12 to less than 20 inches) to John Day Dam 580 Deep River (Wahkiakum Co.) 603 Kalama River Modrow Bridge 640 Snake R. below Ice Harbor Dam 680 Wind River below Shipherd Falls is allowed in waters open to sturgeon fishing. Salmon caught under landlocked salmon rules should not be recorded. 531 Columbia R. John Day 568 Delameter Creek to upper salmon hatchery 642 Snake R. Ice Harbor to Lower 677 Wind River above Shipherd Falls to McNary Dam 618 Drano Lake 602 Kalama River upper salmon Monumental Dam 690 Yakima River Immediately after retaining a salmon and before fishing again, record catch information in ink. 533 Columbia R. McNary Dam 583 Elochoman River mouth hatchery upstream 644 Snake R. Lower Monumental to Hwy. 395 Br. at Pasco to Foster Rd. Bridge 607 Klickitat River below #5 fishway to Little Goose Dam STEELHEAD Did you fish for Steelhead? ____X Yes ____No 534 Columbia R. Hwy. 395 584 Elochoman River Foster 608 Klickitat River above #5 fishway 646 Snake R. Little Goose to Br. to I-182 Br. Rd. Bridge to West Fork 567 Lacamas Creek (Lewis Co.) Lower Granite Dam Do Not Record Released Steelhead DUNGENESS CRAB Did you fish for Crab? ____X Yes ____No Adipose Fin CATCH AREA MO DAY Do Not Record Released Crab COASTAL REGION CODE (1-12) (1-31) 305 Bear River (Pacific Co.) 339 Copalis River 367 Johns River 370 Quigg Lake (Grays Harbor Co.) 333 Skookumchuck River 830 3 15 Three male Dungeness crab MARINE CHECK () ONE BOX FOR CRAB KEPT MONTH DAY 386 Big River (Clallam Co.) 402 Dickey River (Clallam Co.) 369 Kalaloch Creek 404 Quillayute River 384 Smith Creek (Pacific Co.) kept from Hood Canal on July 19 AREA EACH CRAB KEPT PER DAY A hatchery steelhead kept 706 Black River (Grays Harbor/ 320 Elk Creek (Lewis/Pacific Co.) 371 Moclips River 327 Quinault Lake 406 Sol Duc River would be entered as: from the Skagit River on 12 7 19 Thurston Co.) 342 Elk River (Grays Harbor Co.) 373 Mosquito Creek (Jefferson Co.) 410 Quinault R, Lower (below L. 418 Sooes River (Clallam Co.) March 15 would be entered as When you purchase a Puget Sound Dungeness crab endorsement you will be issued a Catch Record 398 Bogachiel River 345 Goodman Creek (Jefferson Co.) 375 Naselle River Quinault, not Cook Cr.) 364 Stevens Creek above. Release wild steelhead. Ventral Fin Card for the summer reporting period which runs through Labor Day. Catch Record Cards for the 400 Calawah River 350 Hoh River below Oxbow 379 Nemah River, North (below Nemah 412 Quinault R, Upper 419 Van Winkle Creek Hatchery Fish (adipose or ventral fin clipped and a healed scar at the location of the clipped fin) winter period which begins the day after Labor Day are available on August 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities
    NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN THE FIRST 10 YEARS (1994–2003) Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities Lita P. Buttolph, William Kay, Susan Charnley, Cassandra Moseley, and Ellen M. Donoghue General Technical Report United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-GTR-679 Department of Service Research Station July 2006 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment
    The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................................ A report by The Climate Impacts Group University of Washington Climate Science June 2009 in the Public Interest Recommended citation: Climate Impacts Group, 2009. The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment, M. McGuire Elsner, J. Littell, and L Whitely Binder (eds). Center for Science in the Earth System, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at: http://www.cses.washington.edu/db/pdf/wacciareport681.pdf Front cover satellite image credit: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?vev1id=4786 NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Visible Earth: A catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet Provided by the SeaWiFS Project, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, and ORBIMAGE The Pacific Northwest is cloud-free in this SeaWiFS image. Multihued phytoplankton blooms are visible off of Washington's Olympic coast. Also visible in this image are: Fraser River outflow, snowcapped peaks of Mt. Olympus, Mt. Rainier, Mt. Adams, Mt. Hood, Mt. Jefferson, the Three Sisters, the North Cascades, and the Columbia and Snake River watersheds. Metadata * Sensor OrbView-2/SeaWiFS * Visualization Date 2000-09-26 * The Visible Earth is part of the EOS Project Science Office located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Small images credits: Wheat: © 2009 www.photos.com Coast; Seattle skyline: © J. Martin Grassley McNary Dam: courtesy Bonneville Power Administration Salmon: courtesy University of Washington News and Information Forest: courtesy Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington Report design: Beth Tully, Edit-Design Center, University of Washington The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Act Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NA TIO NAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard. SUite 1100 PORT LAND, OREGON 97232·1274 January 11 , 2013 Lorri Lee Pacific Northwest Regional Director U .S. Bureau ofReclamation 1160 North Curtis Road, Suite 100 Boise, Idaho 83706-1234 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Odessa Subarea Modified Partial Groundwater Replacement Project. (NWR-2012-9371) Dear Ms. Lee: Enclosed is the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Consultation prepared by National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's (Reclamation) Odessa Subarea Modified Partial Groundwater Replacement Project on the Colwnbia River in Adams, Lincoln, Franklin and Grant Counties, Washington. NMFS received a final biological assessment (BA) from Reclamation on November 6, 2012. Reclamation's BA determined that Columbia River chum salmon were likely to be adversely affected by the proposed action, 12 other species ofESA listed salmon and steelhead would not likely be adversely affected by the proposed action, and that Pacific eulachon, green sturgeon, and southern resident killer whales would not likely be adversely affected by the proposed action. NMFS disagreed with Reclamation's "Not Likely
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Destinations – Utilitarian And
    Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010 Chapter 4: Destinations – Utilitarian and Recreational 2010 Plan Update: Chapter 4 Destinations provides a broad picture of Jefferson County: where people live, work, go to school, shop, and recreate and the locations of tourist facilities and significant public facilities. This information is intended to inform decisions about connecting these destinations with non-motorized transportation facilities. It is not intended as an up-to-date guide. While Chapter 4 has not been updated, it still performs its intended function. This chapter has been retained in the original 2002 Plan format. County, City, Port, School District, State, Federal, and private enterprises have developed an extensive number of commercial, employment, business, educational, recreational, and other public facilities within the County. This extensive array of facilities is of interest to non-motorized transportation and recreational trail users. This chapter describes the most significant destinations. 4.1 Schools The Brinnon, Chimacum, Port Townsend, Queets-Clearwater, Quilcene, Quillayute Valley, and Sequim School Districts provide educational services to Jefferson County residents. Brinnon School District The school district collects students by bus within the district’s service area – which includes all of Brinnon and the areas along US-101 from the Mason County line to Mt Walker and transports them to the central school site. Upper grade students are bused to Quilcene High School. The district operates 6 school bus routes beginning at 6:35-9:00 am and ending at 3:46-4:23 pm for the collection and distribution of different school grades and after school programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 2
    Jefferson County Department of Emergency Management 81 Elkins Road, Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 - Phone: (360) 385-9368 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. INTRODUCTION 6 II. GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 6 III. DEMOGRAPHIC ASPECTS 7 IV. SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL DISASTER EVENTS 9 V. NATURAL HAZARDS 12 • AVALANCHE 13 • DROUGHT 14 • EARTHQUAKES 17 • FLOOD 24 • LANDSLIDE 32 • SEVERE LOCAL STORM 34 • TSUNAMI / SEICHE 38 • VOLCANO 42 • WILDLAND / FOREST / INTERFACE FIRES 45 VI. TECHNOLOGICAL (HUMAN MADE) HAZARDS 48 • CIVIL DISTURBANCE 49 • DAM FAILURE 51 • ENERGY EMERGENCY 53 • FOOD AND WATER CONTAMINATION 56 • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 58 • MARINE OIL SPILL – MAJOR POLLUTION EVENT 60 • SHELTER / REFUGE SITE 62 • TERRORISM 64 • URBAN FIRE 67 RESOURCES / REFERENCES 69 Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 2 PURPOSE This Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment (HIVA) document describes known natural and technological (human-made) hazards that could potentially impact the lives, economy, environment, and property of residents of Jefferson County. It provides a foundation for further planning to ensure that County leadership, agencies, and citizens are aware and prepared to meet the effects of disasters and emergencies. Incident management cannot be event driven. Through increased awareness and preventive measures, the ultimate goal is to help ensure a unified approach that will lesson vulnerability to hazards over time. The HIVA is not a detailed study, but a general overview of known hazards that can affect Jefferson County. Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An integrated emergency management approach involves hazard identification, risk assessment, and vulnerability analysis. This document, the Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment (HIVA) describes the hazard identification and assessment of both natural hazards and technological, or human caused hazards, which exist for the people of Jefferson County.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits
    PNNL-17161 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits Z Yang TP Khangaonkar December 2007 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeks Input at Upcoming Public Meetings in Forks, Aberdeen and Port Angeles
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 19, 2019 Olympic Forest Collaborative Begins 2019 by Building on Successes - Seeks Input at Upcoming Public Meetings in Forks, Aberdeen and Port Angeles Partnership initiated by Representative Kilmer between Timber & Conservation interests has helped increase timber harvest and aquatic restoration projects on Olympic National Forest through consensus-based approach. PORT ANGELES, WA –Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA) & The Olympic Forest Collaborative head in to 2019 with an impressive string of successful projects increasing timber harvest and aquatic restoration on Olympic National Forest. A series of public meetings in 2019 are planned to obtain community input on future projects. “Growing up in Port Angeles, I know that actively managing our federal forests is essential to supporting quality jobs in the timber industry, protecting our environment, and growing our outdoor economy,” said U.S. Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA06) who represents the Olympic Peninsula. “That’s why we embarked on this project to bring together regional leaders to develop innovative approaches to restoring our forests and promoting increased harvest levels. The recent successes achieved by the Olympic Forest Collaborative show that we don’t have to choose between protecting our environment and creating a more vibrant economy.” Over the last three years, the Olympic Forest Collaborative has worked across the Olympic Peninsula assisting the U. S. Forest Service with preparing commercial thinning timber sales to help the Olympic National Forest meet and recently exceed their timber targets, fund habitat and aquatic restoration objectives, and host public meetings around the peninsula. In addition to assisting the Forest on projects, the Olympic Forest Collaborative has successfully developed and prepared two different pilot Habitat Restoration Thinning Stewardship projects which were sold by the Olympic National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II, Chapter 2 Columbia River Estuary and Lower Mainstem Subbasins
    Volume II, Chapter 2 Columbia River Estuary and Lower Mainstem Subbasins TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY AND LOWER MAINSTEM ................................ 2-1 2.1 Subbasin Description.................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.2 History ................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.3 Physical Setting.................................................................................................... 2-7 2.1.4 Fish and Wildlife Resources ................................................................................ 2-8 2.1.5 Habitat Classification......................................................................................... 2-20 2.1.6 Estuary and Lower Mainstem Zones ................................................................. 2-27 2.1.7 Major Land Uses................................................................................................ 2-29 2.1.8 Areas of Biological Significance ....................................................................... 2-29 2.2 Focal Species............................................................................................................. 2-31 2.2.1 Selection Process............................................................................................... 2-31 2.2.2 Ocean-type Salmonids
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A R^C I V"*, *>*S*->^R*>*:^
    Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A r^c i V"*, *>*s*->^r*>*:^ l1^ w >*': -^- ^^1^^"g- -'*^t» *v- »- -^* <^*\ ^fl' y tf^. T^^ ?iM *fjf.-^ Cover. Steeply dipping beds (fluvial channel deposits) of the Eocene Puget Group in the upper part of the Green River Gorge near Kanaskat, southeastern King County, Washington. Photograph by Samuel Y. Johnson, July 1992. Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington By Samuel Y. Johnson and Joseph T. O'Connor EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS CENOZOIC SEDIMENTARY BASINS IN SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON AND NORTHWEST OREGON Samuel Y. Johnson, Project Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Johnson, Samuel Y. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington/by Samuel Y. Johnson and Joseph T. O'Connor. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 2085) (Evolution of sedimentary basins Cenozoic sedimentary basins in southwest Washington and northwest Oregon; A) Includes bibliographical references.
    *S*->^R*>*:^" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • 2. If the Following Recommendation Is Adopted by the King County
    122-86-R Page 7 2. If the following recommendation is adopted by the King County Council, it would meet the purposes and intent of the King County Comprehensive Plan of 1985, and would be consistent with the purposes and provisions of the King County zoning code, particularly the purpose of the potential zone, a s set forth in KMngpm^|o 60 . The conditions recommended below are reasonable and necessary to meet the policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan which are specifically intended to minimize the impacts of quarrying and mining activities on adjacent and nearby land uses. 3. Approval of reclassification of the approximately 25.6 acre property adjacent to the south of the existing quarry would be consistent with the intent of the action taken by King County at the time of the Lower Snoqualmie Valley Area Zoning Study (Ordinance 1913). This reclassification will not be unreasonably incompatible with nor detrimental to surrounding properties and/or the general public. It will enable the applicant to move quarry operations to the south and southwest, which is no longer premature. 4. Reclassification of the 25.6 acre parcel adjacent to the south of the existing quarry meets the requirements of King County Code Section 20.24.190, in that the said parcel is potentially zoned for the proposed use. Reclassification of the 5.4 acre parcel to the east and of the 4.5 acre parcel to the west of the existing quarry site would be inconsistent with KCC 20.24.190. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Q-M-P for the 25.6 acre parcel adjacent to the south of the existing Q-M area, subject to the conditions set forth below, and deny reclassification of the 5.4 acres to the east (Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Washington State Birding Trail  OLYMPIC LOOP
    OLYMPIC LOOP INDEX Sites Page Sites Page INFO KEY 1 1 Nisqually National 2 32 Morse Creek 8 Wildlife Refuge 33 Dungeness National Wildlife 2 Tumwater Historical Park Refuge 3 Capitol Lake 34 Dungeness River Audubon 4 Grass Lake Refuge Center 5 McLane Creek Nature 3 35 Dungeness Bay Trail 36 John Wayne Marina 6 Kennedy Creek 37 Jimmycomelately Creek 9 7 Friends Landing 38 Protection Island National 8 Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Refuge 39 Kah Tai Lagoon Park 9 Humptulips Estuary 4 40 Fort Worden State Park 10 Damon Point 41 Chimacum Creek Estuary 11 Ocean Shores North Jetty 42 Fort Flagler State Park 12 Point Grenville 43 Big Quilcene River 10 13 Campbell Tree Grove Estuary 14 Lake Quinault 44 Mt. Walker 15 Kalaloch Creek 5 45 Dosewallips State Park 16 4th Beach 46 Hamma Hamma Beaver Pond 17 Hoh Rainforest 47 Potlatch State Park 11 18 Anderson Homestead 48 Skokomish Delta 19 La Push 49 Twanoh State Park 20 Quillayute River Estuary 50 GeorgeAdamsSalmon 21 Lake Ozette 6 Hatchery 22 Hobuck Beach 51 Panhandle Lake 4H Camp 23 Cape Flattery 52 Oakland Bay 24 Clallam Bay Park 53 Jarrell Cove State Park 25 Pillar Point County Park 54 Theler Wetlands 12 26 Salt Creek County Park 7 27 Elwha River Estuary CREDITS 12 28 Lake Crescent 29 Whiskey Bend Trail 30 Hurricane Ridge © Ed Newbold, Tufted Puffins 31 Ediz Hook The Great Washington State Birding Trail 1 OLYMPIC LOOP INFO KEY MAp Icons LocAl SERVices And Highlights Best seasons for birding( spring, summer, fall,winter) Overall Washington: www.experiencewashington.com Olympic BirdFest: First weekend in April, Developed camping available, including restrooms; fee required.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold and Fish Pamphlet: Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining
    WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Gold and Fish Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining May 2021 WDFW | 2020 GOLD and FISH - 2nd Edition Table of Contents Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining Rules 1 Agencies with an Interest in Mineral Prospecting 1 Definitions of Terms 8 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwater Without Timing Restrictions 12 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwaters With Timing Restrictions 14 Mineral Prospecting on Ocean Beaches 16 Authorized Work Times 17 Penalties 42 List of Figures Figure 1. High-banker 9 Figure 2. Mini high-banker 9 Figure 3. Mini rocker box (top view and bottom view) 9 Figure 4. Pan 10 Figure 5. Power sluice/suction dredge combination 10 Figure 6. Cross section of a typical redd 10 Fig u re 7. Rocker box (top view and bottom view) 10 Figure 8. Sluice 11 Figure 9. Spiral wheel 11 Figure 10. Suction dredge . 11 Figure 11. Cross section of a typical body of water, showing areas where excavation is not permitted under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 12. Permitted and prohibited excavation sites in a typical body of water under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 13. Limits on excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate on stream banks 14 Figure 14. Excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate within the wetted perimeter is not permitted 1 4 Figure 15. Cross section of a typical body of water showing unstable slopes, stable areas, and permissible or prohibited excavation sites under rules for mineral prospecting with timing restrictions Dashed lines indicates areas where excavation is not permitted 15 Figure 16.
    [Show full text]