Real Progress, Real Challenges: Working Toward Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Real Progress, Real Challenges: Working Toward Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health July 2016 SNOQUALMIE WATERSHED FORUM TEN-YEAR STATUS REPORT 2005-2015 Real Progress, Real Challenges: Working Toward Salmon Recovery and Watershed Health The Snoqualmie Watershed Forum is a partnership of elected officials, citizens and representatives from conservation organizations supporting salmon recovery and ecological health in the Snoqualmie and South Fork Skykomish Watersheds. Member governments include King County, the Snoqualmie Tribe, Tulalip Tribes, the cities of Duvall, Carnation, North Bend and Snoqualmie, and the Town of Skykomish. Since 1998, the Forum and its many partner organizations have worked to protect and restore salmon habitat and improve overall watershed health through collaborative action. From 1998-2005, the Forum played a key role in developing the Snohomish River Basin Salmon Conservation Plan, and since that time has led its implementation in the King County portion of the basin. The Forum’s work is funded by contributions from its member governments, as well as grants from the King County Flood Control District. In 2015, Forum member governments signed an interlocal agreement that renews this partnership through 2025. 3 I INTRODUCTION 4 I HOW ARE SALMON DOING IN OUR WATERSHEDS? 8 I HABITAT RESTORATION: PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES 14 I PROTECTING EXISTING HABITAT IS ALSO CRITICAL FOR FISH 16 I MONITORING EFFORTS TELL US ABOUT THE WATERSHED AND OUR RECOVERY WORK 18 I SUMMER 2015 TEMPERATURE STUDY MAY HOLD LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE 20 I WORKING ON PRIORITIES FOR FISH, FARMS AND FLOODS 22 I SUCCESSES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES 2 SNOQUALMIE WATERSHED FORUM Ten-Year Status Report 2005-2015 Skykomish Snoqualmie The encouraging gains made through restoration are still being outpaced by habitat KING COUNTY loss and degradation throughout Puget Sound. INTRODUCTION of tidal estuary habitat for the South Fork Skykomish & Ten years have passed since the first time in decades; witnessing Snoqualmie Watersheds “ juvenile salmon finding refuge completion of the Snohomish River Basin Salmon Conservation Plan from fast river flows right on the (Salmon Plan) in 2005. This Status footprint of the former levee at Report summarizes progress along the Lower Tolt River Floodplain” the 10-year recovery road map, Reconnection project; or watching with an emphasis on 2011-2015, tribal and non-tribal volunteers and a focus on the King County work side by side to restore portion of the broader Snohomish the riparian corridor along the River Basin. We also highlight some Snoqualmie River at Fall City Park, of the lessons learned and the a former tribal village site. emerging issues that will shape During the past ten years, our efforts in the next decade of Snoqualmie Watershed partners salmon recovery work. have leveraged more than $32 The Salmon Plan’s geographic million into over 100 habitat scope is Water Resource Inventory protection and restoration Area (WRIA) 7, which extends from projects, adopted more stringent the headwaters of the Snoqualmie environmental regulations, and Skykomish watersheds to investigated water quality the Snohomish River estuary and problems, engaged thousands of associated Puget Sound nearshore volunteers in hands-on restoration environment. The Salmon Plan activities, and delivered education laid out a roadmap for the first programs and other outreach decade of a projected 50-year activities to schools, community effort to rebuild populations of groups and landowners Chinook and other salmonids that throughout the watershed. have sustained the people and Moreover, scores of individual ecosystems of the Snohomish, landowners have undertaken Skykomish and Snoqualmie rivers voluntary restoration efforts on for millennia. their residential properties and farms, demonstrating the depth These first ten years have provided of community commitment to many moments of celebration, protecting and restoring our such as the breaching of the levee environment for the benefit of fish, at the Tulalip Tribes’ Qwuloolt wildlife and people. restoration site in 2015 that allowed salmon access to 375 acres Ten-Year Status Report 2005-2015 SNOQUALMIE WATERSHED FORUM 3 But despite many successes, water ‘blob’ in our coastal ocean that caused the salmon food supply to salmon populations in the basin plummet have further exacerbated the situation for salmon in recent years. remain in a dire condition. A recent When salmon encounter poor or significantly impaired habitat conditions analysis by the Tulalip Tribes found during all phases of their lifecycle—in freshwater, estuary and marine areas that spawning populations of —the ability of their populations to ride out periods of extreme conditions Chinook salmon in the Skykomish is severely compromised. and Snoqualmie Rivers are failing If we lose the salmon in our watersheds, we will have lost a major part of to replace themselves from one our region’s identity, and a cherished and valuable renewable food supply. generation to the next, so that Salmon are remarkably adaptable creatures, but we must redouble our fewer than one adult Chinook efforts to give them a chance to bounce back. By learning from our past salmon returns for each spawner of actions and adapting our strategies in the work we do, we believe that our its parent generation. As the Treaty goals for salmon and people are still within reach. Tribes of Western Washington concluded in their 2011 paper HOW ARE SALMON DOING IN OUR WATERSHEDS? “Treaty Rights at Risk,” the There are two distinct Chinook salmon populations in the Snohomish encouraging gains made through Basin. The Skykomish River population uses the Skykomish and its restoration are still being outpaced contributing tributaries and is an “integrated” population, including both by habitat loss and degradation hatchery and natural spawners. The Snoqualmie population spawns throughout Puget Sound. naturally and uses core spawning areas in the Tolt River, Raging River and In the Snoqualmie and South Fork in the Snoqualmie River itself. Skykomish watersheds, the overall A key measure of fish health is “escapement,” the number of adult salmon human population density is quite in a population that “escape” all other sources of mortality to return and low compared to the rest of King spawn in their home stream. In the Snohomish system, escapement varies County, with only 2% of the land substantially year to year due to fluctuating conditions during salmonids’ area located within cities or their freshwater and ocean life stages as well as changing harvest levels. designated Urban Growth Areas. Nevertheless, the combined urban It has been 15 years since Chinook were listed as threatened under the population across our cities has Endangered Species Act (ESA) and populations have fluctuated each year. grown by 14% in the past five While some years have had encouraging Chinook returns, the overall trend years, and additional growth is is static at best and declining at worst. expected as the area’s economy Current Chinook abundance is well below estimated average historical continues to improve, and a levels and significantly below the 50-year recovery goal established in the growing regional population Salmon Plan. In the Snoqualmie, the average escapement levels between looks for housing farther from 1999 and 2015 were 4.8% of the historical abundance and 6% of the 50- major cities. year target (Figure 3). This is a decrease from 6% of historical abundance in We are also learning that our 2009 as reported in the Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Salmon Plan Five-year watersheds and fish populations Status Report. are no longer as resilient to environmental extremes. A record drought year in 2015, higher peak flows and lower low flows due to climate change, and a recent warm 4 SNOQUALMIE WATERSHED FORUM Ten-Year Status Report 2005-2015 Snoqualmie Chinook 3,500 Snoqualmie natural 3,000 spawners 2,500 Four-year 2,000 geometric mean 1,500 1,000 Total Natural Spawners 500 0 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Skykomish Chinook 8,000 Skykomish In light of these declining numbers, 7,000 natural spawners federal, tribal and state managers 6,000 have severely restricted Chinook Four-year 5,000 harvest. Chinook harvest numbers geometric have declined over the years from 4,000 mean a high of more than 70% in the 3,000 mid-1980s to rates closer to 20% 2,000 since the early 2000s. While there is Total Natural Spawners no current harvest effort directed 1,000 at the natural origin Snohomish 0 Chinook stock in Puget Sound, 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 these fish are vulnerable to harvest directed at other area stocks. Figures 1 and 2. Snohomish Basin Chinook escapement (1999-2015) Even with harvest rates at record lows, current research indicates that the population continues to 35,000 decline. Research suggests that 31,000 for Snohomish Basin Chinook, 30,000 Estimated historic each generation of spawning 25,000 Population salmon is smaller in number than 25,000 its parent generation. The 2005 50-year target Salmon Plan attributed decreasing 20,000 1999-2015 average productivity to poor conditions during the juvenile life stages that 15,000 include incubation and rearing in river, estuary and nearshore Adult Escapement 10,000 environments. Snoqualmie Chinook 5,000 1,511 0 Figure 3. Snoqualmie Chinook escapement and recovery benchmarks Ten-Year Status Report 2005-2015 SNOQUALMIE WATERSHED FORUM 5 Coho and steelhead at risk While the Salmon Plan is focused on Chinook recovery, we also consider other salmonid species in our restoration and monitoring efforts. Snohomish Basin Coho 300,000 Snohomish Steelhead, the anadromous version total 250,000 of rainbow trout, are also listed natural as threatened under the ESA. The 200,000 spawners Snoqualmie is home to the small 150,000 Four-year Tolt River summer run, which geometric spawns only in the Tolt and its two 100,000 mean forks, and the larger Snoqualmie 50,000 River winter run, which spawns Total Natural Spawners primarily in the mainstem 0 Snoqualmie, Tolt and Raging Rivers.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A R^C I V"*, *>*S*->^R*>*:^
    Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A r^c i V"*, *>*s*->^r*>*:^ l1^ w >*': -^- ^^1^^"g- -'*^t» *v- »- -^* <^*\ ^fl' y tf^. T^^ ?iM *fjf.-^ Cover. Steeply dipping beds (fluvial channel deposits) of the Eocene Puget Group in the upper part of the Green River Gorge near Kanaskat, southeastern King County, Washington. Photograph by Samuel Y. Johnson, July 1992. Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington By Samuel Y. Johnson and Joseph T. O'Connor EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS CENOZOIC SEDIMENTARY BASINS IN SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON AND NORTHWEST OREGON Samuel Y. Johnson, Project Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2085-A A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Johnson, Samuel Y. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and provenance of the Raging River Formation (Early? and Middle Eocene), King County, Washington/by Samuel Y. Johnson and Joseph T. O'Connor. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 2085) (Evolution of sedimentary basins Cenozoic sedimentary basins in southwest Washington and northwest Oregon; A) Includes bibliographical references.
    *S*->^R*>*:^" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • 2. If the Following Recommendation Is Adopted by the King County
    122-86-R Page 7 2. If the following recommendation is adopted by the King County Council, it would meet the purposes and intent of the King County Comprehensive Plan of 1985, and would be consistent with the purposes and provisions of the King County zoning code, particularly the purpose of the potential zone, a s set forth in KMngpm^|o 60 . The conditions recommended below are reasonable and necessary to meet the policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan which are specifically intended to minimize the impacts of quarrying and mining activities on adjacent and nearby land uses. 3. Approval of reclassification of the approximately 25.6 acre property adjacent to the south of the existing quarry would be consistent with the intent of the action taken by King County at the time of the Lower Snoqualmie Valley Area Zoning Study (Ordinance 1913). This reclassification will not be unreasonably incompatible with nor detrimental to surrounding properties and/or the general public. It will enable the applicant to move quarry operations to the south and southwest, which is no longer premature. 4. Reclassification of the 25.6 acre parcel adjacent to the south of the existing quarry meets the requirements of King County Code Section 20.24.190, in that the said parcel is potentially zoned for the proposed use. Reclassification of the 5.4 acre parcel to the east and of the 4.5 acre parcel to the west of the existing quarry site would be inconsistent with KCC 20.24.190. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Q-M-P for the 25.6 acre parcel adjacent to the south of the existing Q-M area, subject to the conditions set forth below, and deny reclassification of the 5.4 acres to the east (Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Temperature Conditions in the Snohomish River Basin July 2021
    Water Temperature Conditions in the Snohomish River Basin July 2021 Prepared for: Snohomish River Basin Salmon Recovery Technical Committee Prepared by: Josh Kubo, Andrew Miller, and Emily Davis. King County Water Land and Resources Division. Acknowledgements: Project Team: Emily Davis, Elissa Ostergaard, Kollin Higgins, Andrew Miller, and Josh Kubo Reviewers: Matt Baerwalde, Dave Beedle, Keith Binkley, Steve Britsch, Curtis DeGasperi, Aimee Fullerton, Kollin Higgins, Heather Kahn, Janne Kaje, Frank Leonetti, Kurt Nelson, Elissa Ostergaard, Colin Wahl. Recommended Citation: Kubo, J., A. Miller, and E. Davis. 2021. Water Temperature Conditions in the Snohomish River Basin. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water Land and Resources Division, Seattle, WA. July, 2021 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Why is water temperature important for salmon recovery? ................................................................... 6 Drivers of Water Temperature ............................................................................................................... 10 Human Alterations to Aquatic Thermal Regimes ................................................................................... 16 Water Temperature Standards in the Snohomish River Basin ............................................................... 21 Water Temperature Conditions in the Snohomish River Basin .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Catch Record Cards & Codes
    Catch Record Cards Catch Record Card Codes The Catch Record Card is an important management tool for estimating the recreational catch of PUGET SOUND REGION sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness crab. A catch record card must be REMINDER! 824 Baker River 724 Dakota Creek (Whatcom Co.) 770 McAllister Creek (Thurston Co.) 814 Salt Creek (Clallam Co.) 874 Stillaguamish River, South Fork in your possession to fish for these species. Washington Administrative Code (WAC 220-56-175, WAC 825 Baker Lake 726 Deep Creek (Clallam Co.) 778 Minter Creek (Pierce/Kitsap Co.) 816 Samish River 832 Suiattle River 220-69-236) requires all kept sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness Return your Catch Record Cards 784 Berry Creek 728 Deschutes River 782 Morse Creek (Clallam Co.) 828 Sauk River 854 Sultan River crab to be recorded on your Catch Record Card, and requires all anglers to return their fish Catch by the date printed on the card 812 Big Quilcene River 732 Dewatto River 786 Nisqually River 818 Sekiu River 878 Tahuya River Record Card by April 30, or for Dungeness crab by the date indicated on the card, even if nothing “With or Without Catch” 748 Big Soos Creek 734 Dosewallips River 794 Nooksack River (below North Fork) 830 Skagit River 856 Tokul Creek is caught or you did not fish. Please use the instruction sheet issued with your card. Please return 708 Burley Creek (Kitsap Co.) 736 Duckabush River 790 Nooksack River, North Fork 834 Skokomish River (Mason Co.) 858 Tolt River Catch Record Cards to: WDFW CRC Unit, PO Box 43142, Olympia WA 98504-3142.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Puget Sound Low Flow Survey
    CENTRAL PUGET SOUND LOW FLOW SURVEY Prepared for The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife By John Lombard Steward and Associates and Dave Somers Dave Somers Consulting FINAL REPORT November 30, 2004 Steward and Associates 120 Avenue A, Suite D Snohomish, Washington 98290 Tel (360) 862-1255 Fax (360) 563-0393 www.stewardandassociates.com Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 Definition of Low Flow Problem ........................................................................................... 2 Adopted Regulatory Instream Flows .................................................................................... 6 Climate Change....................................................................................................................... 7 Quantification of Instream Flow Needs ................................................................................ 7 Recommendations.................................................................................................................10 Summary Reports by WRIA................................................................................................ 12 STILLAGUAMISH (WRIA 5)........................................................................................... 12 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................... 12 Draft Stillaguamish – WRIA 5 Chinook Salmon Recovery Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Eocene Rocks in a Part of King County, Washington
    State of Washington ALBERT D. ROSELLINI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Report of Investigations No. 21 STRATIGRAPHY OF EOCENE ROCKS IN A PART OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON by JAMES D. VINE U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California Prepared Cooperatively by the United States Geological Survey STAT£ PRINTING PLANT. OLYMPIA, WASH. 1962 For sale by Department of Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, 50 cents. ~ 3 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . • . 2 Facies relations within the Puget Group . 4 Raging River Formation . 7 Puget Group . 12 Tiger Mountain Formation . 12 Tukwila Formation ... .. .... ... ... .. .. .. .. ..... .. .. 14 Renton Formation . 16 Summary ... .... ... ....... .. .. .. .. ..... ....... .... 17 References cited . 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map of part of King County, Washington, showing location of areas described . 2 2. Correlation chart showing Puget Group and equivalent forma- tions . 3 3. Stratigraphic column and index map showing position of fossil localities, King County, Washington .... ......... .......... 10 TABLES Table 1. Fossil invertebrates from the Raging River Formation, King County, Washington 9 2. Foraminiferal species from fae Raging River Formation . 11 3. Fossil leaves from the Tiger Mountain Format:on, King County, Washington . 13 4. Fossil leaves from the Tukwila Formation, King County, Wash- ington ....................... ..... ... .... ................. 15 STRATIGRAPHY OF EOCENE ROCKS IN A PART OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON1 By JAMrs D. VINE2 ABSTRACT Marine rocks of Eo::ene age in part of King County, Washington, are over­ lain by a sequence of nonmarine rocks of Eocene age including both volcanic and nonvolcanic types. The volcanic type is c~ar acterized by andesitic tuff­ breccia and epiclastic sandstone, whereas the nonvolcanic type is characterized by arkosic micaceous sandstcne, siltstone, and coal beds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Placed Wood on the Physical Habitat and Thermal Conditions in the Raging River, WA
    The Effects of Placed Wood on the Physical Habitat and Thermal Conditions in the Raging River, WA January 2017 Alternate Formats Available The Effects of Placed Wood on the Physical Habitat and Thermal Conditions in the Raging River, WA Prepared for: The Snoqualmie Watershed Forum and the King County Flood Control District Submitted by: Kate Macneale King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Funded by: This study was funded by the Snoqualmie Watershed Forum through Cooperative Watershed Management grant funds and by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Cooperative Water Program. The Effects of Placed Wood on the Physical Habitat and Thermal Conditions in the Raging River, WA Acknowledgements We thank Ray Timm for developing the original proposal, for obtaining grant funding for King County, and for providing support throughout the study. We thank the following King County Water and Land Resources Division staff for their technical or field help: Bob Pendergast, Josh Kubo, Andrew Miller, Dan Lantz, Chris Gregersen, Chris Knutson, Jo Wilhelm, Kay Kitamura, and Ken Rauscher. We thank Andrew Gendaszek of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for securing matching funds from the USGS Cooperative Water Program. We also thank Andrew Gendaszek and Chad Opatz for their collaboration, and for the operation of the fiber-optic distributed temperature sensor. We thank Josh Kubo, Josh Latterell, Andrew Miller, Beth leDoux, Kate O’Laughlin, and Deb Lester of King County Water and Land Resources Division for their helpful discussions and careful reviews of the report. Citation King County. 2016. The effects of placed wood on the physical habitat and thermal conditions in the Raging River, WA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-21 Capital Budget Proposed Compromise 2020 Local and Community Projects (Dollars in Thousands)
    Capital Budget Proposed Compromise Senate Floor Striking Amendment to SHB 1102 (S-4578.1/19) April 27, 2019 Senate Committee Services Office of Program Research Debt Limit Washington State has a constitutional debt limit. The State Treasurer may not issue any bonds that would cause the debt service (principal and interest payments) on any new and existing bonds to exceed this limit. Under a constitutional amendment approved by the voters in 2012, the state debt limit is currently 8.25 percent of the average of the prior six years’ general state revenues, defined as all unrestricted state tax revenues. This limit is reduced to 8 percent beginning on July 1, 2034. Bond Capacity A model administered by the State Treasurer’s Office is used to calculate the available bond capacity for the current budgeting period and for future biennial planning purposes. The model calculates the actual debt service on outstanding bonds and is used to estimate future debt service based on certain assumptions including revenue growth, interest rates, rate of repayment, rate of bond issuance, and other factors. For the 2019–21 biennium, projected bond capacity is $3.2 billion. This bond capacity incorporates the 2019 March Economic and Revenue forecast and estimated increases in general state revenue from legislative actions. In addition, there is capacity remaining from bonds previously authorized, including from the Streamflow Restoration program, from the 2018 Supplemental Capital Budget, and from adjusting funding in the 2019 Supplemental Capital Budget. Appropriations for 2019–21 and 2019 Supplemental Budget After the enacted 2018 Supplemental Capital Budget, there was $10.8 million in bond capacity remaining.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Temperature Profiles for Reaches of the Raging River During Summer Baseflow, King County, Western Washington, July 2015
    Prepared in cooperation with King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water Temperature Profiles for Reaches of the Raging River during Summer Baseflow, King County, Western Washington, July 2015 Data Series 983 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing large wood placements in Raging River, King County, Washington. Photograph by Andrew Gendaszek, U.S. Geological Survey, March 19, 2014. Water Temperature Profiles for Reaches of the Raging River during Summer Baseflow, King County, Western Washington, July 2015 By Andrew S. Gendaszek and Chad C. Opatz Prepared in cooperation with King County Department of Natural Resource and Parks Data Series 983 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Gendaszek, A.S., and Opatz, C.C., 2016, Water temperature profiles for reaches of the Raging River during summer baseflow, King County, western Washington, July 2015: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Raging River Natural Area
    RAGING RIVER NATURAL AREA (Leong Property) FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN Property Location 52.5 acres on the east side of Raging River, 2.3 miles south of the Snoqualmie River Bridge in Fall City. Legal Description King County, WA Portion NW¼ Sec. 27, T24N, R7E and Portion E½ Sec. 28,T24N, R7E Additional legal(s) on: Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#: 272407-9024-07, 272407-9028-03, 282407-9025-08, 282407-9032-06 (See Also Attachment A) Plan Prepared By King County Resource Professionals: Bill Loeber, Forester Kirk Anderson, WRIA 7 Basin Steward Tom Eksten, Trails Coordinator Chuck Lennox, Interpretive Programs Coordinator March 2001 Forest Legacy Program Acquisition This Forest Stewardship Plan is being prepared to comply with the grant requirements of the US Forest Service Forest Legacy Program. Forest Legacy funds were used to purchase the development rights from the portion of the property referred to as the “Forest Conservation Easement ” in the legal description and on the property map. However, in order to develop appropriate resource management strategies, King County felt the plan should cover all parcels within the site. Consistent with the requirements of the Forest Legacy Program, a conservation easement is recorded on the property concurrent with the acquisition of the development rights. Any revision to the Forest Stewardship Plan would need to be consistent with the purposes and requirements of the Forest Legacy Program and approved by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREST STEWARDSHIP VISION
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Report Cover Sheet
    CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET DAHP Project Number: (Please contact the lead agency for the project number. If associated to SEPA, please contact [email protected] to obtain the project number before creating a new project.) Author: Alicia Valentino and F. Scott Pierson Title of Report: Ronnei-Raum House Cultural Resources Assessment, Fall City, Washington Date of Report: June 12, 2020 County(ies): King Section: 15 Township: 24N Range: 7E Quad: Fall City, WA 7.5-minute Acres: 0.32 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes No Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? Yes DAHP Case # No DAHP Archaeological Site #: Revised 9-26-2018 Ronnei-Raum House Cultural Resources Assessment, Fall City, Washington Prepared by: Alicia Valentino, Ph.D., RPA F. Scott Pierson, B.A. June 12, 2020 WillametteCRA Report Number 20-14 Legal description: T24N R7E S15 County: King USGS quad: Fall City Project Acreage: 0.32 Acres Surveyed: 0.32 Findings: None Fieldnotes: on file, WillametteCRA Curation: None Ronnei-Raum House Cultural Resources Assessment Fall City, Washington Prepared by: Alicia Valentino, Ph.D., RPA F. Scott Pierson, B.A. June 12, 2020 Prepared for: Historic Seattle Willamette Cultural Resources Associates, Ltd. Portland and Seattle WillametteCRA Report Number 20-14 Table of Contents Introduction and Project Description ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Mountain Public Use Plan
    Part I – Introduction and Planning Guidelines Introduction The Taylor Mountain Public Use Plan and Trails Assessment is a partnership planning project between the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WADNR), King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks (KCDNR&P), and the City of Seattle – Cedar River Watershed. The plan is to review and determine appropriate low-impact recreational opportunities in the greater Taylor Mountain Area. Approximately 54% of the state’s population is located within an hour’s drive to the planning area. From 1990 to 2000, recreational use at Tiger Mountain State Forest increased 48%. Due to the heavy recreational use at Tiger Mountain State Forest and the public lands located along the entire Mountains to Sound Greenway/I-90 corridor, this study and resultant plan are intended to help disperse recreational use and demand to the south and the east of I-90 and State Route 18 (SR 18). Taylor Mountain is becoming more popular for low-impact recreational use. This plan addresses public use and access concerns, trail conditions and damage to natural resources across the entire planning area and across jurisdictional boundaries. It further addresses existing trail conditions and needed trail improvements, trail circulation issues and ecological impacts of recreational use. This study was funded by an Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation – Nonhighway and Off-road Vehicle Activities (IAC – NOVA) Grant Planning Area Description The Taylor Mountain Public Use Planning Area is located south and east of Tiger Mountain, south of I-90 and east of SR 18, between the communities of Hobart and North Bend in eastern King County (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]