DOCSLIB.ORG

Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Estimated Historic Presence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area For Estimated Historic Presence STATE WA RecoveryUnit CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Chilliwack River 0.424000 Columbia River 194.563000 Depot Creek 0.728000 Kettle River 0.001000 Palouse River 6.209000 Silesia Creek 0.374000 Skagit River 0.258000 Snake River 58.638000 Sumas River 1.449000 Walla Walla River 0.224000 Yakima River 0.988000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (11 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 263.856000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 11 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 263.856000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 11 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 1 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Clark Fork River Basin CORE_AREA Lake Pend Orielle NAME SumOfMILES Binarch Creek 7.608000 Upper West Branch Priest River 20.590000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lake Pend Orielle (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 28.198000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 CORE_AREA Priest Lake NAME SumOfMILES Bench Creek 2.114000 Cache Creek 2.898000 Gold Creek 3.269000 Jackson Creek 3.140000 Kalispell Creek 15.541000 Muskegon Creek 1.838000 North Fork Granite Creek 6.642000 Sema Creek 4.365000 South Fork Granite Creek 12.461000 Tillicum Creek 0.742000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Priest Lake (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 81.208000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 12 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 2 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Clearwater River Basin CORE_AREA Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River NAME SumOfMILES Snake River 0.077000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River (1 detail record) SumMilesPerCoreArea 0.077000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 1 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 0.077000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 1 RecoveryUnit Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 96.586000 Kalama River 0.237000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 96.823000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 96.823000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 2 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 3 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Grande Ronde River Basin CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES 8.345000 Indian Tom Creek 2.244000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 10.589000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 CORE_AREA Grande Ronde River NAME SumOfMILES 0.037000 Butte Creek 7.129000 Crooked Creek 7.751000 First Creek 4.347000 Grande Ronde River 80.729000 Melton Creek 3.459000 Milk Creek 3.239000 North Fork Wenaha River 11.416000 South Fork Wenaha River 8.120000 Third Creek 3.290000 Wenaha River 21.751000 West Fork Butte Creek 2.183000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Grande Ronde River (12 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 153.451000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 12 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 164.040000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 14 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 4 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Hood River Basin CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 3.000000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (1 detail record) SumMilesPerCoreArea 3.000000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 1 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 3.000000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 1 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 5 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Lower Columbia River Basin CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 110.994000 Kalama River 10.385000 Lewis River 0.585000 White Salmon Creek 16.316000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (4 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 138.280000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 4 CORE_AREA Klickitat NAME SumOfMILES 3.185000 0.048000 0.825000 Clearwater Creek 0.443000 Fish Lake Stream 7.612000 Klickitat River 63.781000 Little Muddy Creek 2.103000 Trappers Creek 1.585000 West Fork Klickitat River 4.554000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Klickitat (9 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 84.136000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 9 CORE_AREA Lewis NAME SumOfMILES 1.660000 0.723000 2.996000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 6 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Lewis NAME SumOfMILES 0.624000 Big Creek 0.118000 Canyon Creek 0.531000 Chickoon Creek 0.247000 Cougar Creek 1.606000 Cussed Hollow 0.196000 Lewis River 67.274000 Muddy River 10.713000 Panamaker Creek 0.971000 Pine Creek 7.592000 Rush Creek 2.648000 Smith Creek 4.127000 Spencer Creek 0.356000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lewis (16 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 102.382000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 16 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 324.798000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 29 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 7 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Middle Columbia River Basin CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES 0.756000 1.213000 0.176000 0.790000 2.401000 0.442000 0.468000 Ahtanum Creek 21.955000 American River 16.761000 Bear Creek 0.579000 Bear Creek 2.004000 Bear Creek 1.061000 Beverly Creek 3.537000 Big Creek 11.060000 Blowout Creek 1.383000 Box Canyon Creek 1.935000 Bumping River 21.283000 Cabin Creek 3.886000 Cherry Creek 1.325000 Chief Creek 0.859000 Cle Elum River 37.254000 Clear Creek 4.075000 Cold Creek 2.529000 Coleman Creek 23.954000 Cooper River 9.043000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 8 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Corral Creek 0.675000 Cowiche Creek 7.312000 Crow Creek 9.869000 Deep Creek 4.892000 DeRoux Creek 1.286000 Dog Creek 0.693000 Fall Creek 0.395000 Fortune Creek 2.333000 Foundation Creek 2.163000 Gold Creek 5.372000 Grey Creek 0.317000 Hindoo Creek 1.213000 Indian Creek 2.570000 Indian Creek 4.582000 Iron Creek 1.830000 Jack Creek 1.952000 Jungle Creek 3.515000 Kachess River 13.501000 Kettle Creek 2.030000 Lemah Creek 3.253000 Little Naches River 13.125000 Little Wildcat Creek 3.186000 Lookout Creek 0.589000 Manastash Creek 8.441000 Meadow Creek 4.942000 Middle Creek 1.818000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 9 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Middle Fork Ahtanum Creek 8.775000 Middle Fork Little Naches Rive 4.731000 Middle Fork Teanaway River 12.360000 Milk Creek 3.827000 Mineral Creek 0.462000 Naches River 44.655000 Naneum Creek 0.397000 Nile Creek 7.071000 North Fork Ahtanum Creek 20.515000 North Fork Clear Creek 0.585000 North Fork Foundation Creek 4.021000 North Fork Little Naches River 6.137000 North Fork Nile Creek 2.258000 North Fork Rattlesnake Creek 4.070000 North Fork Taneum Creek 10.395000 North Fork Teanaway River 16.290000 North Fork Tieton River 18.215000 Oak Creek 3.156000 Orr Creek 3.422000 Pileup Creek 1.945000 Quartz Creek 2.917000 Rattlesnake Creek 21.244000 Reservation Creek 3.625000 Reynolds Creek 5.842000 Rock Creek 0.693000 Shell Creek 0.149000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 10 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Shellneck Creek 1.654000 Short And Dirty Creek 0.394000 Shovel Creek 0.643000 South Fork Ahtanum Creek 13.234000 South Fork Clear Creek 1.273000 South Fork Cowiche Creek 21.980000 South Fork Foundation Creek 2.035000 South Fork Little Naches River 8.708000 South Fork Manastash Creek 18.981000 South Fork Taneum Creek 7.517000 South Fork Tieton River 13.749000 Spruce Creek 0.579000 Stafford Creek 4.782000 Standup Creek 2.832000 Swauk Creek 20.744000 Taneum Creek 12.679000 Teanaway River 12.099000 Teiton River 24.012000 Thunder Creek 3.256000 Timber Creek 0.538000 Union Creek 0.424000 Waptus River 12.906000 West Fork Bear Creek 1.911000 West Fork Creek 0.970000 West Fork Teanaway River 13.880000 Wildcat Creek 6.190000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 11 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Yakima NAME SumOfMILES Williams Creek 4.336000 Yakima River 220.209000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Yakima (105 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 912.855000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 105 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 912.855000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 105 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 12 of 52 STATE WA RecoveryUnit Northeast Washington River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES 0.777000 0.137000 2.489000 8.218000 4.283000 Bear Trap Canyon 0.685000 Big Sheep Creek 4.044000 Blue Creek 0.864000 Boulder Creek 2.521000 Butte Fork 1.386000 Columbia River 142.765000 Cougar Creek 4.241000 Deadman Creek 15.716000 Deep Creek 0.909000 Deep Creek 6.719000 Hawk Creek 3.413000 Jenny Creek 0.712000 Kettle River 33.228000 Kettle River 28.956000 Little Boulder Creek 4.987000 Little Sheep Creek 2.774000 Marias Creek 4.052000 Monaghan Creek 0.758000 Nancy Creek 0.508000 Nicholson Creek 6.065000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 13 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES North Fork Beaver Creek 0.157000 North Fork Boulder Creek 8.411000 North Fork Deadman Creek 8.213000 North Fork Little Boulder Cree 3.230000 O'Brien Creek 5.055000 Onion Creek 11.902000 Sanpoli River 63.222000 Sherman Creek 0.952000 South Fork Boulder Creek 13.505000 South Fork Little Boulder Cree 1.821000 South Fork O'Brian Creek 5.749000 Spokane River 29.404000 Tonata Creek 8.511000 Toroda Creek 22.727000 West Fork Onion Creek 1.655000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (40 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 465.721000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 40 CORE_AREA Pend Oreille NAME SumOfMILES 0.223000 Big Muddy Creek 5.296000 Browns Creek 3.293000 Calispell Creek 12.311000 Cedar Creek 8.485000 Cee Cee Ah Creek 4.068000 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 14 of 52 STATE WA CORE_AREA Pend Oreille NAME SumOfMILES Cusick Creek 8.763000 Deemer Creek 2.046000 East Branch Le Clerc Creek 11.802000 East Fork Smalle Creek 4.150000 Flume Creek 0.408000 Fourth Of July Creek 0.264000 Graham Creek 2.058000 Gypsy Creek 1.942000 Harvey Creek 14.461000 Indian Creek 2.385000 Jim Creek 1.228000 Kent Creek 2.264000 Le Clerc Creek 1.130000 Leola Creek 2.531000 Little Muddy Creek 6.986000 Little Ruby Creek 1.547000 Lunch Creek 0.710000 McCloud Creek 3.079000 Middle Branch Le Clerc Creek 5.636000 Middle Creek 7.028000 Middle Fork Harvey Creek 2.331000 Mill Creek 1.207000 Mineral Creek 2.927000 North Fork Harvey Creek 2.315000 North Fork Ruby Creek 1.565000 North Fork Skookum Creek 1.982000
Recommended publications
  • The Wild Cascades

    The Wild Cascades

    THE WILD CASCADES April-May 1969 2 THE WILD CASCADES MORE (BUT NOT THE LAST) ABOUT ALPINE LAKES We recently carried in these pages an article by Brock Evans, Northwest Conservation Representative, on Alpine Lakes: Stepchild of the North Cascades. Mr. L. O. Barrett, Supervisor of Snoqualmie National Forest, feels the article contained "some rather significant misinterpretations" and has asked the opportunity to respond. Following are Mr. Barrett's comments on portions of Mr. Evans' article, together with Mr. Evans' rejoinders. Barrett: The Alpine Lakes Area is still wilderness quality in part because of the nature of the land, and in part because the Forest Service has managed it as wilderness type area since 1946. We will continue to protect it from timber harvesting, mining and excessive recreation use until Congress makes a decision about its suitability for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Evans: The wilderness parts of the Alpine Lakes region that are being lost are those which the Forest Service has chosen not to manage as wilderness. The 1946 date referred to is the date of the establishment of the Alpine Lake Limited Area. This designation granted a measure of administrative protection to a substantial part of the region; but much was left out. The logging in the Miller River, Foss River, Deception Creek, Cooper Lake, and Eight Mile Creek valleys all took place in wilderness-type areas which we proposed for protection which were outside the limited area. The Forest Service cannot protect its lands from mineral prospecting or, ulti­ mately, from mining operations of some types — because of the mining laws.
  • Stand Density Conditions for Umatilla National Forest: a Range of Variation Analysis

    Stand Density Conditions for Umatilla National Forest: a Range of Variation Analysis

    WHITE PAPER F14-SO-WP-SILV-50 Stand Density Conditions for Umatilla National Forest: A Range of Variation Analysis David C. Powell; Forest Silviculturist Supervisor’s Office; Pendleton, OR Initial Version: FEBRUARY 20131 Most Recent Revision: JUNE 2013 INTRODUCTION Umatilla National Forest adopted a program-of-work (POW) process in February 2013 involving three criteria: 1. Values at risk, including human infrastructure (Johnson 2013). 2. Subwatersheds where existing stand density exceeds a range of variation for stand density. 3. Unique habitats such as old-growth forests, aspen clones, riparian habitat conserva- tion areas, and meadows (Archuleta 2013). This white paper describes a process used to assess stand density conditions for Umatilla National Forest. A Forest-wide, stand-density assessment was completed to meet project planning needs associated with criterion #2 of a POW process. This assessment uses an analytical technique called the range of variation (RV), de- fined as a range of conditions likely to have occurred in the Blue Mountains prior to Euro-American settlement in mid-1800s. A white paper (WP Silv-3) provides concepts, principles, and methods relating to range of variation (Powell 2019) – that white paper provides more information about RV. Briefly, a stand-density assessment involved 4 steps: (1) compiling a dataset charac- terizing stand density conditions for Umatilla NF, (2) stratifying density data by biophysi- cal environment, (3) completing an RV analysis by using subwatersheds as landscape units, and (4) summarizing results while also accounting for land-use restrictions. 1 White papers are internal reports; they receive only limited review. Viewpoints expressed in this paper are those of the author – they may not represent positions of USDA Forest Service.
  • San Mateo County

    San Mateo County

    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
  • Chapter 16. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit

    Chapter 16. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit

    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 16. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit 447 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 16 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 16. Grande Ronde River Critical Habitat Unit The Grande Ronde River CHU is essential to the conservation of bull trout because is supports strong bull trout populations and provides high-quality habitat to potentially expand bull trout distribution and is considered to be essential for bull trout recovery in the Mid-Columbia RU. The eleven populations in this CHU are spread over a large geographical area with multiple age classes, containing both resident and fluvial fish. This bull trout stronghold also has a prey base; connectivity with the Snake River; general distribution of bull trout throughout the habitat; and varying habitat conditions. But in several of the populations, including the Wenaha River, Lostine River, Lookingglass Creek, and Little Minam River populations, excellent habitat conditions exist; many streams and rivers are designated as Wild and Scenic Rivers and/or located within or near Wilderness areas. Two wilderness areas are designated within the Grande Ronde River basin. The Eagle Cap Wilderness is located in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, encompasses 146,272 (ha) (361,446 ac), and includes most of the Minam, upper Wallowa and Lostine river drainages as well as Bear Creek and Hurricane Creek and a small portion of Catherine Creek. Federal Wild and Scenic River status is designated for the Lostine and Minam Rivers and Oregon State Scenic Waterway status is designated to the Minam and Wallowa Rivers.
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington

    Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington by R.W. Tabor1 , R.A. Haugerud2, D.B. Booth3, and E.H. Brown4 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Olympia, Washington, 98504 OPEN FILE REPORT 94-403 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iu.S.G.S., Menlo Park, California 94025 2U.S.G.S., University of Washington, AJ-20, Seattle, Washington 98195 3SWMD, King County Department of Public Works, Seattle, Washington, 98104 ^Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 INTRODUCTION The Mount Baker 30- by 60-minute quadrangle encompasses rocks and structures that represent the essence of North Cascade geology. The quadrangle is mostly rugged and remote and includes much of the North Cascade National Park and several dedicated Wilderness areas managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Geologic exploration has been slow and difficult. In 1858 George Gibbs (1874) ascended the Skagit River part way to begin the geographic and geologic exploration of the North Cascades. In 1901, Reginald Daly (1912) surveyed the 49th parallel along the Canadian side of the border, and George Smith and Frank Calkins (1904) surveyed the United States' side. Daly's exhaustive report was the first attempt to synthesize what has become an extremely complicated geologic story.
  • 1New Olympic Sports

    1New Olympic Sports

    SPORT_109.qxp_Layout 1 11/19/19 9:29 AM Page 109 2020WASHINGTONGUIDE Under Construction Washington’s Sports Scene Adds New and Improved Venues Site InSpections5 of Event-Ready Destinations The Evergreen Statelives up to its nickname with these SPG A Premier Travel Media publication awesome outdoor sights www.SportsPlanningGuide.com SPORT_110.qxp_Layout 1 11/22/19 2:15 PM Page 110 Ralph L. Morton Executive Director Seattle Sports Commission Within the state of Washington, pairings of professional and amateur sports, seascape and landscape, and arenas and outdoor complexes are uniquely highlighted. Our authentic brand encapsulates an innovative, passionate, sustainable community that embraces its beautiful natural environment and provides an ideal platform for launching new franchises and hosting premiere events. Award-winning restaurants and hotels provide hospitality to the loudest, most loyal fans in the country, selling out stadiums and enticing season tickets holders. We put the environment at the forefront of our operations, embracing sustainability in our sports complexes, businesses, communities, and way of life. Our stadiums boast incredible waste diversions rates, renewable energy sources, and carbon offsets. Washington is proud to showcase the best of Pacific Northwest culture as a welcoming, inclusive place with stunning, natural beauty and ever-improving infrastructure. Washington has a rich history in collegiate athletics, celebrating extraordinary achievements on the field, in the water, and on the court, continuously raising the bar for success at the Division I, II, and III levels. We are proud to add an NHL team as Seattle’s seventh sports franchise as the city seeks its 16th national championship honor, and continue to build a legacy in professional sports.
  • Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board

    Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board

    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 12-1986 Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) California Regional Water Quality Control Board Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation California Regional Water Quality Control Board, "Water Quality Control Plan. San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2)" (1986). California Agencies. Paper 393. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/393 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATER QUA~ITY · CONTROL PLAN Cover photo by: MICHAEL DRENNAN. Senior Water Resources Engineer San Francisco Bay Region DONALD E. ANDERSON, CHAIRMAN PETER W. SNYDER, VICE CHAIRMAN* FRED KLATTE* JANICE E. MONDAVI MARION OTSEA • KENNETH R. MERCER JEPTHA WADE PHILIP WENTE *Basin Plan Committee 1986 3 F N R R This report was prepared under the direction of Roger B. James ......................................................................... Executive Officer Lawrence P. Kolb ...................................................................... Assistant Executive Officer Richard H. Whitsel ..................................................................
  • Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence

    Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area for Current Presence

    Count of LLID and Sum of Miles Per State, RU, and Core Area For Current Presence STATE wa RecoveryUnit CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Chilliwack River 0.424000 Columbia River 194.728000 Depot Creek 0.728000 Kettle River 0.001000 Palouse River 6.209000 Silesia Creek 0.374000 Skagit River 0.258000 Snake River 58.637000 Sumas River 1.449000 Yakima River 0.845000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 263.653000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 1 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Clark Fork River Basin CORE_AREA Priest Lake NAME SumOfMILES Bench Creek 2.114000 Cache Creek 2.898000 Gold Creek 3.269000 Jackson Creek 3.140000 Kalispell Creek 15.541000 Muskegon Creek 1.838000 North Fork Granite Creek 6.642000 Sema Creek 4.365000 South Fork Granite Creek 12.461000 Tillicum Creek 0.742000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Priest Lake (10 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 10 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 53.010000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 10 RecoveryUnit Clearwater River Basin CORE_AREA Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River NAME SumOfMILES Bess Creek 1.770000 Snake River 0.077000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA' = Lower and Middle Fork Clearwater River (2 detail records) SumMilesPerCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerCoreArea 2 SumMilesPerRUAndCoreArea 1.847000 CountLLIDPerRUAndCoreArea 2 Saturday, January 01, 2005 Page 2 of 46 STATE wa RecoveryUnit Columbia River CORE_AREA NAME SumOfMILES Columbia River 98.250000 Summary for 'CORE_AREA'
  • 443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards

    443 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated Water Quality Standards

    Environmental Protection Agency § 131.33 Subpart D—Federally Promulgated of streams located in Indian country, Water Quality Standards or as may be modified by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region X, pursu- § 131.31 Arizona. ant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, ° (a) [Reserved] a temperature criterion of 10 C, ex- (b) The following waters have, in ad- pressed as an average of daily max- dition to the uses designated by the imum temperatures over a seven-day State, the designated use of fish con- period, applies to the waterbodies iden- sumption as defined in R18–11–101 tified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (which is available from the Arizona during the months of June, July, Au- Department of Environmental Quality, gust and September. Water Quality Division, 3033 North (2) The following waters are pro- Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012): tected for bull trout spawning and rearing: COLORADO MAIN STEM RIVER (i) BOISE-MORE BASIN: Devils BASIN: Creek, East Fork Sheep Creek, Sheep Hualapai Wash MIDDLE GILA RIVER BASIN: Creek. Agua Fria River (Camelback Road to (ii) BROWNLEE RESERVOIR BASIN: Avondale WWTP) Crooked River, Indian Creek. Galena Gulch (iii) CLEARWATER BASIN: Big Can- Gila River (Felix Road to the Salt yon Creek, Cougar Creek, Feather River) Creek, Laguna Creek, Lolo Creek, Queen Creek (Headwaters to the Su- Orofino Creek, Talapus Creek, West perior WWTP) Fork Potlatch River. Queen Creek (Below Potts Canyon) (iv) COEUR D’ALENE LAKE BASIN: SAN PEDRO RIVER BASIN: Cougar Creek, Fernan Creek, Kid Copper Creek Creek, Mica Creek, South Fork Mica SANTA CRUZ RIVER BASIN: Creek, Squaw Creek, Turner Creek.
  • Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California

    Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California

    Becker Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Steelhead/Rainbow Trout Resources South of the Golden Gate, California October 2008 Gordon S. Becker #ENTERFOR%COSYSTEM-ANAGEMENT2ESTORATION Isabelle J. Reining (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Cartography by David A. Asbury Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy and The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Resources South of the Golden Gate, California The mission of the Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration is to make effective use of scientific information to promote the restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems. The Center is a not-for-profit corporation, and contributions in support of its programs are tax-deductible. Center for Ecosystem Management & Restoration 4179 Piedmont Ave, Suite 325, Oakland, CA 94611 Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 510.420.4565 http://www.cemar.org CEMAR The cover image is a map of the watershed area of streams tributary to the Pacific Ocean south of the Golden Gate, California, by CEMAR. The image above is a 1934 Gazos Creek stream survey report published by the California Division of Fish and Game. Book design by Audrey Kallander. Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California Gordon S. Becker Isabelle J. Reining Cartography by David A. Asbury This report should be cited as: Becker, G.S. and I.J. Reining. 2008. Steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) resources south of the Golden Gate, California. Cartography by D.A. Asbury. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration. Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward pg. 3 Introduction pg.
  • Final Shoreline Master Program Southeast Washington Coalition Shoreline Master Program Update

    Final Shoreline Master Program Southeast Washington Coalition Shoreline Master Program Update

    Planning Commission Review Draft: June 2016 BOCC Review: July 2016 Adopted: August 2016 Approved: February 28, 2017 Effective: March 9, 2017 March 2017 PREPARED FOR: ASOTIN, COLUMBIA, AND GARFIELD COUNTIES, THE CITY OF CLARKSTON, AND THE TOWN OF STARBUCK Final Shoreline Master Program Southeast Washington Coalition Shoreline Master Program Update Prepared by: Prepared with assistance from: Oneza & Associates Pineo Ecological Services, LLC 8033 W. Grandridge Boulevard, Suite A Kennewick, Washington 99336 This report was funded through a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: Shoreline Goals and Policies (RCW 90.58.100) ...................................................... 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Relationship between the Growth Management Act and Shoreline Management Act ....................................................................................................................................... 1 3 Profile of the Shoreline Jurisdiction within the SE WA Region ................................ 2 3.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction Rivers ..................................................................... 2 3.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance ........................................................ 3 4 Goals and Policies .......................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Economic Development Element ............................................................
  • Index to Washington Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Data Sites

    Index to Washington Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Data Sites

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer INDEX TO WASHINGTON SNOW SURVEY AND WATER SUPPLY FORECASTING DATA SITES Elev. in Elev. in Site Label on Map Official Site Name Site No. Site Type Tow nship Range Section Basin WBD 12 Digit HU WBD 12 Digit HU Name County State Latitude Longtitude Site Type Tow nship Range Section Basin WBD 12 Digit HU WBD 12 Digit HU Name Latitude Longtitude Feet Site Label on Map Official Site Name Site No. Feet County State 1 Ahtanum Creek at Union Gap, WA 12502500 SF 940 12N 19E 8 170300030105 Lower Ahtanum Creek Yakima WA 46 32 -120 28 Milkshakes Milkshakes Pillow 17D20S S 5577 6N 39E 21 Lower Snake 170701020201 Upper Mill Creek Wallowa OR 45 58 -117 56 Ahtanum R.S. Ahtanum R.S. 21C11 SC 3100 12N 14E 24 Lower Yakima 170300030101 Headwaters North Fork Ahtnum Creek Yakima WA 46 30 -121 01 31 Mill Creek at Walla Walla, WA 14015000 SF 1120 7N 36E 23 170701020204 Lower Mill Creek Walla Walla WA 46 04 -118 16 Alpine Meadows Alpine Meadows 21B48 SC 3500 27N 9E 31 Central Puget 171100100501 Upper North Fork Tolt River Snohomish WA 47 46 -121 41 Miners Ridge Miners Ridge Pillow 20A40S S 6200 31N 15E 11 North Puget 171100060202 Miners Creek-Suiattle River Snohomish WA 48 12 -120 57 Alpine Meadows Pillow Alpine Meadows Pillow 21B48S S 3500 27N 9E 31 Central Puget 171100100501 Upper North Fork Tolt River Snohomish WA 47 46 -121 41 Mission Ridge Mission Ridge 20B29 SC 5000 21N 19E 25 Central Columbia 170200100309 Squilchuck Creek