DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Final UNITED STATES AIR FORCE INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM FINAL CY 2007 Annual Report Remedial Action – Operation (RA-O) Basewide Long-Term Monitoring and Monitored Natural Attenuation (LF-01, LF-02, LF-06, SS-34, WP-44, DP-60, WP-64) (Project No. PQWY 2000-0700-7) McChord Air Force Base, Washington Prepared for: Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Environmental Restoration Division Brooks City-Base, Texas and United States Air Force 62 CES/CEV McChord Air Force Base, Washington Prepared by: Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Lakewood, Colorado October 2008 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM Final CY 2007 Annual Report Remedial Action – Operation (RA-O) Basewide Long-Term Monitoring and Monitored Natural Attenuation (LF-01, LF-02, LF-06, SS-34, WP-44, DP-60, WP-64) (Project No. PQWY 2000-0700-7) McChord Air Force Base, Washington Prepared for: Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Environmental Restoration Division Brooks City-Base, Texas and U.S. Air Force 62 CES/CEV McChord Air Force Base, Washington Prepared by: 143 Union Boulevard, Suite 1010 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 (303) 988-2202 October 2008 NOTICE This report was prepared for the United States Air Force (Air Force) by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. to guide the implementation of the Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) of the Basewide Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) and Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) projects at McChord Air Force Base under the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature of the IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on the environment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, because subsequent facts may become known that may make this report premature or inaccurate. Acceptance does not mean that the Air Force adopts the conclusions, recommendations, or other views expressed herein, which are those of the contractor only and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Air Force. REPORT DOCUMENT PAGE Form approved OMB No. 0704-0189 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED October 2008 Final Calendar Year (CY) 2007 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS CY 2007 Annual Report—Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) F41624-03-D-8600 Basewide Long-Term Monitoring and Monitored Natural Delivery Order 0032 Attenuation (LF-01, LF-02, LF-06, SS-34, WP-44, DP-60, WP- 64) (Project No. PQWY 2000-0700-7), McChord Air Force Base, Washington 6. AUTHOR(S) Mr. Mark Ingersoll Mr. Rick Weingarz Mr. Morgan Omdal 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER ADDRESS(ES) N/A Tetra Tech EC, Inc. 143 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT ADDRESS(ES) NUMBER Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment N/A Excellence, AFCEE/ERD, 3300 Sidney Brooks, Building 532, Brooks City-Base, TX 78235-5363 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12.b DISTRIBUTION CODE AFCEE, McChord AFB, 62 CES/CEV 13. ABSTRACT 15. NUMBER OF PAGES The report summarizes the CY 2007 Environmental Restoration Approximately 94 (report body including figures) Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring and Monitored Natural 140 (appendices) Attenuation projects, excluding the RA-O projects at Area D/American Lake Garden Tract and Site SS-34N. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 16. PRICE CODE • McChord Air Force Base • Base Boundary Wells • NFRAP Sites • QA/QC • Groundwater Summary • Consent Decree Sites 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT UL Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified SN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18-298-102 Contents CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Air Force Installation Restoration Program............................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Installation Description................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.1 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Groundwater Hydrology................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Site Inventory.................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3.1 Base Boundary Wells....................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.2 Consent Decree Sites....................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 No Further Response Action Planned Sites ................................................................ 1-9 2. PROJECT ACTIVITIES....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Field Activities................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Groundwater Sampling................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Static Water Level Measurements.................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.3 Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control .................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Laboratory Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Analytical Program .......................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program.............................................................. 2-7 2.3 Data Evaluation.............................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.3.1 Methodology for Data Quality Assessment................................................................. 2-7 2.3.2 Data Analysis and Interpretation................................................................................... 2-7 2.4 Monitored Natural Attenuation.................................................................................................2-12 3. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS RESULTS....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Field Parameters............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Chemical Analytical Data.............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.1 Base Boundary Wells....................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Consent Decree Sites LF-01 and LF-02....................................................................... 3-2 3.2.3 Consent Decree Site SS-34............................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.4 Consent Decree Site WP-44........................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.5 Consent Decree Site WP-64........................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.6 NFRAP Site LF-06 .......................................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.7 NFRAP Site DP-60 ......................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Static Water Level Measurement Data........................................................................................ 3-6 3.3.1 Basewide............................................................................................................................ 3-6 3.3.2 Consent Decree Sites....................................................................................................... 3-9 3.3.3 NFRAP Sites ....................................................................................................................3-9 4. CY 2007 CONCLUSIONS AND CY 2008 PLANNING .............................................................. 4-1 4.1 CY 2007 Conclusions...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • President's Page
    President’s Page New President’s Initiatives As you may have heard by now, our annual meeting in San Diego in May was very successful. The science, working meetings and the social events were fantastic, attendance neared recent record highs (1369), and good financial rev- enue will help keep us solvent. My theme on this page throughout the year will be “Make a Difference in Aerospace Medicine with AsMA.” To do that, we need to have a strong and effective organization in place to serve its members in that goal. In order to allow this, I would like to iterate some initiatives to perform with your help. The first initiative is to increase membership. As an in- ternational leader, AsMA speaks with authority and its posi- tions and resolutions are highly regarded. However, we Philip J. Scarpa, Jr., M.D., M.S. have an issue with declining membership. While we should not strive to have quantity over quality, a very low member- Wikipedia, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, key to market- ship could seriously hinder our inherent activities as an au- ing and branding our organization and key to reaching thoritative leader such as in producing a quality journal, our younger Aerospace Medicine specialists. extensive committee work, and strong advocacy. I propose The third initiative is to strengthen our finances. to appeal to certain groups that may wish to consider AsMA Unfortunately, AsMA lives too close to the break-even point membership, such as aviation nurses, dentists, medevac each year. If we continue unaltered, the organization will coast guard units, and aeromedical examiners.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Others an Empirical System for Assessing the Impact Of
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 289 906 TM 870 733 AUTHOR Rumford, Michael D.; And Others TITLE An Empirical System for Assessing the Impact of Aptitude Requirement Adjustments on Air Force Initial Skills Training. INSTITUTION Advanced Research Resources Organization, Bethesda, Md. SPONS AGENCY Air Force Human Resources Lab., Brooks AFB, Tex. Manpower and Personnel Div. REPORT NO AFHRL-TR-86-19 PUB DATE Sep 87 CONTRACT F33615-83-C-0036 NOTE 116p.; Appendix B is marginally legible. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01 /PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; *Aptitude Treatment Interaction; *Course Content; Labor Force Development; Mathematical Models; *Military Personnel; *Military Training; Occupational Surveys; *Outcomes of Education; Path Analysis; Predictive Measurement; Training Objectives; *Vocational Aptitude IDENTIFIERS Air Force; Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery ABSTRACT A multivariate modeling approach was developed to assess the impact of changes in aptitude requirement minimums on U.S. Air Force technical training outcomes. Initially, interviews were conducted with technical training personnel to identify significant student inputs, course content, and training outcome variables. Measures of these variables were formulated on the basis of personnel records and routinely available training documents, znd data were assembled for over 5,000 trainees in 39 initial-skills courses at five Air Force bases. A cross-validation sample consisted of about 1,000 trainees in nine courses. Using formal path analysis (LISREL V computer program), an empirical model of the training process was developed. Although aptitude was one of the best predictors of the quality of student performance, it interacted with a vaiiety of other student input and course content variables in determining training outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • 16004491.Pdf
    -'DEFENSE ATOMIC SUPPORT AGENCY Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico ,L/PE - 175 Hi%&UhIiT~ SAIdDIA BASE ALBu2umxJE, la$ mXIc0 7 October 1960 This is to cert!e tlmt during the TDY period at this station, Govement Guarters were available and Goverrrment Fessing facilities were not availzble for the following mmoers of I%Ki: Colonel &w, Og~arHe USA Pi3 jor Andm~n,Qaude T. USAF Lt. Colonel fsderacn, George R. USAF Doctor lrndMvrsj could Re Doctor Acdrem, Howard L. USPIG Colonel ksMlla stephen G. USA Colonel Ayars, Laurence S. USAF Lt. Colonel Bec~ew~ki,Zbignie~ J. USAF Lt. Colonel BaMinp, George S., Jr. USAF bjor Barlow, Lundie I:., Jr. UMG Ckmzzder m, h3.llian E. USPHS Ujor Gentley, Jack C. UskF Colonel Sess, Ceroge C. , WAF Docto2 Eethard, 2. F. Lt. c=Jlonel Eayer, David H., USfiF hejor Bittick, Paul, Jr. USAF COlOIle3. Forah, hUlhm N. USAF &;tail? Boulerman, :!alter I!. USAF Comander hwers, Jesse L. USN Cz?trin Brovm, Benjamin H, USAF Ca?tain Bunstock, lrKulam H. USAF Colonel Campbell, lkul A. USAF Colonel Caples, Joseph T. USA Colonel. Collins, CleM J. USA rmctor Collins, Vincent P. X. Colonel c0nner#, Joseph A. USAF Cx:kain ktis, Sidney H. USAF Lt. Colonel Dauer, hxmll USA Colonel kvis, Paul w, USAF Captsir: Deranian, Paul UShT Loctcir Dllle, J. Robert Captain Duffher, Gerald J. USN hctor Duguidp Xobert H. kptain arly, klarren L. use Ca?,kin Endera, Iamnce J. USAF Colonel hspey, James G., Jr. USAF’ & . Farber, Sheldon USNR Caifain Farmer, C. D. USAF Ivajor Fltzpatrick, Jack C. USA Colonel FYxdtt, Nchard s.
    [Show full text]
  • Phan Rang AB, RVN ...Keeping the Memories Alive Phan Rang AB News No
    “Happy Valley” Phan Rang AB, RVN ...keeping the memories alive Phan Rang AB News No. 151 “Stories worth telling” In this issue: Phan Rang Member Profiles Christopher Boles John T. Claybaugh Steve Phillips Steve Curry Charles Edward Meyer Richard Oelker John Walters Thomas Petersen Michaelangelo Rodriguez John Deegan Robert Agrifoglio James Wesley Etichson Jim Rabourn The Art of Ronald Dreher Doug’s Comments Phan Rang Member Profiles Christopher Boles I came into this world on May 12, 1948, Santa Paula California. My mom gave me a Kodak Brownie camera for Christmas at age 7 (still have it). I can recall the first time I used it was to take b/w photographs at Disneyland on the Jungle Ride. It was in high school I signed up for photography classes and found the love of photography. It was that ability to take a photo, process the film, and make prints. The photography class was part of the yearbook staff and I was out for every game of football, basketball and school activity. What photography afforded me in high school, being a shy kid, was a chance to be close to the cheerleaders who in my opinion were the prettiest girls at school. It was through photography I found out that photographers had access to places that the public doesn’t normally get to go. Page 1 The Phan Rang AB News No. 151 “Happy Valley” Phan Rang AB, RVN ...keeping the memories alive Phan Rang AB News No. 151 “Stories worth telling” My mom gave me her Argus A7 (35mm) and that changed my life, as I could get 36 shots on a roll instead of 12 on the Brownie.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of “Kellyusa,” but USAF Will Keep the Field As a Part Kelly Field of Lackland
    Most of the huge Texas base is now The Return of “KellyUSA,” but USAF will keep the field as a part Kelly Field of Lackland. EARLY 85 years after it first set up shop as a flight school for pilots in the Army’s Aviation NSection, Kelly Field, which grew into one of the nation’s oldest and most colorful military bases, has regained its original name and returned to its original mission of training airmen. On July 13, much of the sprawling Texas complex that has been Kelly Air Force Base officially becomes “KellyUSA,” a vast industrial park for aerospace firms, major corpora- tions, and San Antonio businesses. Major elements of the logistics op- erations that have been the base’s primary mission since World War II already have shifted to other instal- lations. Many of the Air Force fa- cilities are passing to civilian hands. However, under the conversion In its early days, Kelly Field truly was a field—an unpaved former cotton field. Here, cadets awaiting their turn to fly sit in a shelter watching the Jennys plans, the base’s airfield and flight being prepared for take off from the grass. operations will remain under the Air Force and become part of Lackland AFB, Tex., which itself was carved out of the Kelly complex during World War II. Now called Kelly Field Annex, it is home to the 149th Fighter Wing (ANG) and the 433rd Airlift Wing (AFRC). Joint-use arrangements will allow the businesses that move into By Bruce D. Callander KellyUSA to use the runways as well.
    [Show full text]
  • BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS TX-3521 2507 Kennedy Circle HABS TX-3521 San Antonio Bexar County Texas
    BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS TX-3521 2507 Kennedy Circle HABS TX-3521 San Antonio Bexar County Texas PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SOUTHWEST SYSTEM SUPPORT OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior PO Box 728 Santa Fe, New Mexico HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS No. TX- 3521 Location: 2507 Kennedy Circle San Antonio Bexar County Texas ~~~QQtJ;lJ;~'l;:,t~~~,\,~,ii;) Uni'VefS'al";,q;:faflsvefS@",M(}f,~~"@(1ordjll'ateS: 1-4.,;),;)2948.3246714· ~::;. E:{1~>t~"'·· L ~,o ~~c;L ~;~>')::'i;i''\''i Present Owner: Brooks Development Authority (BDA) Present Occupant: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) Present Use: Aerospace research and education Significance: The U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) at Brooks Air Force Base (AFB) is significant for its contributions to aviation and aerospace medicine. By pursuing research relating to the medical aspects of flight, USAFSAM has provided pilots and astronauts with the necessary equipment and support to ensure their overall safety and health. In 1926, Brooks Field began its first association with the School of Aviation Medicine (SAM) when it moved from New York in order to support the Primary Flying School at Brooks Field. While stationed there from 1926 to 1931, the school trained flight surgeons as well as performed cadet physical examinations. SAM's brief but important tenure at Brooks Field served as a vital step in the development of aviation medicine and its contributions to pilot safety and training. In 1959, SAM again was relocated to Brooks AFB as part of an Air Force plan to concentrate its aerospace medical research facilities at one location.
    [Show full text]
  • Of International Publications in Aerospace Medicine
    DOT/FAA/AM-07/2 Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC 20591 Index of International Publications in Aerospace Medicine Melchor J. Antuñano Katherine Wade Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City, OK 73125 January 2007 Final Report NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents thereof. ___________ This publication and all Office of Aerospace Medicine technical reports are available in full-text from the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute’s publications Web site: www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/oamtechreports/index.cfm Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AM-07/2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Index of International Publications in Aerospace Medicine January 2007 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Antuñano MJ, Wade K 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Aerospace Medicine Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplemental Notes 16. Abstract The 3rd edition of the Index of International Publications in Aerospace Medicine is a comprehensive listing of international publications in clinical aerospace medicine, operational aerospace medicine, aerospace physiology, environmental medicine/physiology, diving medicine/physiology, aerospace human factors, as well as other topics directly or indirectly related to aerospace medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • WAKE ISLAND HALS UM-1 (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS UM-1 (Peale Island) (Wilkes Island) (Wake Atoll) Wake Island US Minor Islands
    WAKE ISLAND HALS UM-1 (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS UM-1 (Peale Island) (Wilkes Island) (Wake Atoll) Wake Island US Minor Islands PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY WAKE ISLAND (Wake Island National Historic Landmark) HALS No. UM-1 Location: Wake Atoll is a small tropical coral atoll in the Pacific Ocean consisting of three islands (Peale, Wake, and Wilkes) enclosing the shallow, central lagoon and surrounded by a narrow fringing reef. From reef to reef, the atoll is approximately 5 miles long and 2.5 miles wide. At 19 degrees 17 minutes north latitude and 166 degrees 3 8 minutes east longitude, the atoll lies just west of the International Date Line. Wake Atoll is 2,458 miles west ofHawai'i, 1,591 miles east of Guam, and 691 miles north ofKwajalein in the Marshall Islands (Aaron 2008:1-1). (Refer to Figure 1). Present Owner: Wake Island is an unorganized, unincorporated territory (possession) of the United States, part of the United States Minor Outlying Islands, administered by the Office of Insular Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior (Aaron 2008b and Aaron 2008: 1-1 ). Effective October 1, 2010, 611 th Air Force in Alaska assumed management responsibility for the atoll. Previously, this responsibility was under 15th Air Wing (AW) of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) at Hickam AFB in Honolulu. Present Occupant and Use: Access to the island is managed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2008 809 PRESIDENT’S PAGE, from P
    President’s Page Friends…Colleagues, A colleague and I were discussing graduate stud- ies in human factors when he suddenly blurted out a comment that took me at first quite aback. It went something like, “Well, there is nothing new in aviation medicine or human factors…it’s all the same old stuff rehashed over and over!” My immediate reaction was to less-than-politely suggest that my colleague consider another field of study. However, after some delibera- tion, I realized that there was some truth in what he said. In the end, I merely informed him that, yes, there are some issues that require revisiting a number of times, yet there is also a plethora of areas that aero- Andrew H. Bellenkes, Ph.D. space medical specialists have only begun to explore, especially those associated with the use of advanced based technologies with humans in such a way so as to human-centered technologies in the aerospace ensure that humans are not task overloaded. As such, environment. limited cognitive resources are effectively exploited in Take, for instance, the field of human-systems in- such a fashion so as to maximize human-system perfor- tegration (HSI) in system design, where aeromedicine mance and minimize error. Doing so not only facilitates and human factors come together with a host of other more effective workload management, but as such disciplines (manpower, personnel, safety, survivability, reduces the physical and mental stressors that might human factors engineering and training) to help create otherwise contribute to problems in the health, safety everything from airliners to spacecraft, tools, weapons, and overall behavior of aircrews, air traffic controllers virtually almost anything we humans use.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF MAJOR INSTALLATIONS BASE FACT SHEETS G.:F..He B*",*-..'T," DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE and REALIGNMENTCOMMISSIOP~ 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 2
    DCN 1117 USAF MAJOR INSTALLATIONS BASE FACT SHEETS g.:F..he b*",*-..'t," DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENTCOMMISSIOP~ 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 2 . 5 -'.. *.s ARLINGTON. VA 22209 +w-' lwy& 703-696-0504 &-L ", -e ',;, e n!er to this when wr~ty~~r~d%Qa_tctt\ February 13, 1995 ,----- Headquarters USAF/RT 1670 Air Force Pentagon Washington D.C. 20330-1670 Dear General Blume: To enhance the background knowledge of the Air Force Team members on the current Air Force hfhmwture, we request Base Fact Sheets on individual major installations located within the US.be fo'mded to the commission at your earliest convenience. These fact sheets are a standard product prepared by the Air Force's Bases and Units Division of the Directorate of Operations and are used by Air Force leaders and congressional representatives for information purposes. The fact sheets contain only current information pertaining to the bases, i.e., location, major units assigned, manpower authorizations, congressionally announced ehanges, and the most i cumnt MILCON programs as approved or submitted to Congress. The information will stbe 1 used as m@ed data in the analysis of the DOD closure and realignment recommendations to be ....... on March 1, 1995. \ Thank you for your support in this request. SZ&. F cis A. ~rillo. Air Force Team ~eader FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY USAF BASE FACT SHEET w ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA MAJCOM/LOCATION/SIZE: AETC base in Altus with 3,878 acres MAJOR UNITSIFORCE STRUCTURE: 97th Air Mobility Wing -- Provides formal airlift and tanker training -- 6 C-5A, 12 C-141B, and 24 KC-135R USAF MANPOWER AUTHORIZATIONS: (As of FY 9512) MILITARY--Am CIVILIAN TOTAL ANNOUNCED ACTIONS: The 97th Air Mobility Wing will lose 1 C-141B aircraft in midl-1995.
    [Show full text]