AY November 1983.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
- www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil -
Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways, -
En Relación Con La Información Solicitada, Se Adjuntan En Anexo
SECRE TARIA DE ESTADO DE RELACIONES CON LAS CORTES RESPUESTA DEL GOBIERNO (184) PREGUNTA ESCRITA CONGRESO 184/34062 y 184/34063 17/05/2018 89479 y 89480 AUTOR/A: HEREDIA DÍAZ, Miguel Ángel (GS) RESPUESTA: En relación con la información solicitada, se adjuntan en anexo ficheros con el detalle por compañía aérea y aeropuerto, de los vuelos cancelados y retrasados del año 2017 y 2018 (periodo enero a mayo). Madrid, 30 de julio de 2018 Vuelos programados y operados retrasados en la Red de AENA, por Compañía Aérea y aeropuerto (*) Periodo: Año 2017 (datos provisionales) (*) Vuelos retrasados son aquellos que estando programados, se retrasaron más de 15 minutos. No incluye cargueros Aeropuerto Total Año Real 2017 Programados y operados Cod OACI: Nombre Cia retrasados AAB: ABELAG AVIATION 74 AAF: AIGLE AZUR 13 AAL: AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. 1.314 AAR: ASIANA AIRLINES Inc. 4 AAU: AEROPA SRL 3 ABF: SCANWINGS OY, FINDLAND 2 ABG: ROYAL FLIGHT AIRLINES, CJSC 128 ABP: ABS JETS 16 ABR: ASL AIRLINES (IRELAND) LTD 103 ACA: AIR CANADA 170 ADN: AERODIENST GMBH, NUMBERG 11 ADR: ADRIA AIRWAYS 33 ADZ: AVIODELTA LTD. 3 AEA: AIR EUROPA 26.340 AEE: AEGEAN AIRLINES 264 AEH: AERO4M, D.O.O 44 AFL: AEROFLOT - RUSSIAN AIRLINES 1.661 AFQ: ALBA SERVIZI AEROTRASPORTI SPA 7 AFR: AIR FRANCE 3.377 AHO: AIR HAMBURG 568 AHY: AZERBAIJAN HAVA YOLLARI, NATIO 10 AIC: AIR INDIA 124 AIZ: ARKIA ISRAEL INLAND AIRLINES 134 AJU: AIR JETSUL 125 AKK: SUNDT AIR MANAGEMENT 1 AKN: ALKAN AIR LTD. 18 AMB: DRF STIFTUNG LUFTRETTUNG 1 AMC: AIR MALTA P.L.C. -
Review of Wastewater Monitoring Applications for Public Health and Novel Aspects of Environmental Quality
Review of wastewater monitoring applications for public health and novel aspects of environmental quality Review of wastewater monitoring applications for public health and novel aspects of environmental quality Full report Natalie Sims, Lisa Avery, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern Published by CREW – Scotland’s Centre of Expertise for Waters. CREW connects research and policy, delivering objective and robust research and expert opinion to support the development and implementation of water policy in Scotland. CREW is a partnership between the James Hutton Institute and all Scottish Higher Education Institutes and Research Institutes supported by MASTS. The Centre is funded by the Scottish Government. Authors: Natalie Sims¹, Lisa Avery², Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern1* 1 Department of Chemistry, University of Bath 2 The James Hutton Institute * Corresponding author ([email protected]) Please reference this report as follows: Natalie Sims, Lisa Avery, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern (2021) Review of wastewater monitoring applications for public health and novel aspects of environmental quality (CD2020_07). Scotland’s Centre of Expertise for Waters (CREW). Available online at: crew.ac.uk/publications CREW project manager: Rachel Helliwell ISBN: 978-0-902701-85-4 Dissemination status: Unrestricted Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, modified or stored in a retrieval system without the prior written permission of CREW management. While every effort is made to ensure that the information given here is accurate, no legal responsibility is accepted for any errors, omissions or misleading statements. All statements, views and opinions expressed in this paper are attributable to the author(s) who contribute to the activities of CREW and do not necessarily represent those of the host institutions or funders. -
The UK Domestic Air Transport System: How and Why Is It Changing?
The UK domestic air transport system: how and why is it changing? Future of Mobility: Evidence Review Foresight, Government Office for Science The UK domestic air transport system: how and why is it changing? The UK domestic air transport system: how and why is it changing? Dr Lucy Budd Reader in Air Transport, Loughborough University Professor Stephen Ison Professor of Transport Policy, Loughborough University February 2019 This review has been commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Mobility project. The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of any government or organisation. This document is not a statement of government policy. This report has an information cut-off date of September 2018. The UK domestic air transport system: how and why is it changing? Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Scope of the review ............................................................................................................................. 4 Scale and operational characteristics of UK domestic air transport ...................................................... 4 Development and regulation of UK domestic air transport .................................................................... 5 Trends in UK domestic -
B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 748/2009 Of
02009R0748 — EN — 15.02.2019 — 012.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 748/2009 of 5 August 2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 219, 22.8.2009, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 82/2010 of 28 January 2010 L 25 12 29.1.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 115/2011 of 2 February 2011 L 39 1 12.2.2011 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 394/2011 of 20 April 2011 L 107 1 27.4.2011 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2012 of 3 February 2012 L 39 1 11.2.2012 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 109/2013 of 29 January 2013 L 40 1 9.2.2013 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 815/2013 of 27 August 2013 L 236 1 4.9.2013 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 100/2014 of 5 February 2014 L 37 1 6.2.2014 ►M8 Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 L 34 1 10.2.2015 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/282 of 26 February 2016 L 56 1 2.3.2016 ►M10 Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/294 of 20 February -
With Scotland Performing Well by Global Standards, Our Current Strategy Has Had a Positive Impact - but There Is Still More to Be Done
Environmental Protection Scotland Room 3, Caledonian Suite, 70 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 2QZ Tel: 0141 333 6655 Fax: 0141 333 1116 Email: [email protected] www.ep-scotland.org.uk Environmental Protection Scotland is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation SCIO Scottish Charity No. SC 043410 “WITH SCOTLAND PERFORMING WELL BY GLOBAL STANDARDS, OUR CURRENT STRATEGY HAS HAD A POSITIVE IMPACT - BUT THERE IS STILL MORE TO BE DONE THE INDEPENDENT CLEANER AIR FOR SCOTLAND (CAFS) REVIEW Analysis: John Bynorth ON August 29th, the independent review of the Cleaner Air For Scotland (CAFS) strategy was published. Led by Professor Campbell Gemmell, the document reviewed the progress of the Scottish Government initiative and made 10 high level recommendations. It concluded that, generally Scotland was performing quite well by comparison with the rest of the EU and the world overall. There were falling levels of regulated pollution emissions and ambient air pollutant levels are also down. However, the report added that more needs to be done particularly in relation to emission sources other than just from transport, such as agriculture and domestic burning. The report flagged nitrogen oxides, particulates and ammonia from agriculture, issues around transport emissions and the choices people have when it comes to car use and active travel. Although it said CAFS has had a positive impact, the report found its overall structure was complex, there was a major governance gap for future air quality strategy delivery at ministerial level, and the overall governance group was misnamed – because it had no actual ‘governance’ or decision making power. -
This Item Was Submitted to Loughborough's Institutional
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Grounded: Characterising the market exit of European low cost carriers Lucy Budd, Graham Francis, Ian Humphreys and Stephen Ison Transport Studies Group, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK Abstract The aim of this paper is to undertake a comprehensive study of LCC market entry and exit in Europe between 1992 and 2012. In the 20 year period between 1992 and 2012, 43 low cost carriers (LCCs) have taken advantage of the progressive liberalisation of the European aviation market and commenced scheduled flight operations within the continent. Of these 43, only 10 remain operational, a failure rate of 77%. This paper contributes to extant literature on LCCs by examining the market entry, business practices, operating longevity and fate of failed operators to characterise European LCC market exit. Drawing on the findings of a detailed continental-wide study, the paper identifies that an airline’s start-up date, the nature and size of its operation and the size and composition of its aircraft fleet are key factors which influence LCC success and failure. The implications for both European and emerging LCC markets are discussed. Keywords: Low cost carriers (LCCs), market exit, Europe. -
List of EU Air Carriers Holding an Active Operating Licence
Active Licenses Operating licences granted Member State: Austria Decision Name of air carrier Address of air carrier Permitted to carry Category (1) effective since ABC Bedarfsflug GmbH 6020 Innsbruck - Fürstenweg 176, Tyrolean Center passengers, cargo, mail B 16/04/2003 AFS Alpine Flightservice GmbH Wallenmahd 23, 6850 Dornbirn passengers, cargo, mail B 20/08/2015 Air Independence GmbH 5020 Salzburg, Airport, Innsbrucker Bundesstraße 95 passengers, cargo, mail A 22/01/2009 Airlink Luftverkehrsgesellschaft m.b.H. 5035 Salzburg-Flughafen - Innsbrucker Bundesstraße 95 passengers, cargo, mail A 31/03/2005 Alpenflug Gesellschaft m.b.H.& Co.KG. 5700 Zell am See passengers, cargo, mail B 14/08/2008 Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH Office Park 3, Top 312, 1300 Wien-Flughafen passengers, cargo, mail A 24/03/2011 Amira Air GmbH Wipplingerstraße 35/5. OG, 1010 Wien passengers, cargo, mail A 12/09/2019 Anisec Luftfahrt GmbH Office Park 1, Top B04, 1300 Wien Flughafen passengers, cargo, mail A 09/07/2018 ARA Flugrettung gemeinnützige GmbH 9020 Klagenfurt - Grete-Bittner-Straße 9 passengers, cargo, mail A 03/11/2005 ART Aviation Flugbetriebs GmbH Porzellangasse 7/Top 2, 1090 Wien passengers, cargo, mail A 14/11/2012 Austrian Airlines AG 1300 Wien-Flughafen - Office Park 2 passengers, cargo, mail A 10/09/2007 Disclaimer: The table reflects the data available in ACOL-database on 16/10/2020. The data is provided by the Member States. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy or the completeness of the data included in this document nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. 1 Active Licenses Decision Name of air carrier Address of air carrier Permitted to carry Category (1) effective since 5020 Salzburg-Flughafen - Innsbrucker Bundesstraße AVAG AIR GmbH für Luftfahrt passengers, cargo, mail B 02/11/2006 111 Avcon Jet AG Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040 Wien passengers, cargo, mail A 03/04/2008 B.A.C.H. -
Airline Bankruptcy: the Post-Deregulation Epidemic
Airline Bankruptcy: The Post-Deregulation Epidemic By Paul Stephen Dempsey McGill University Institute of Air & Space Law Copyright © 2012 by the author • “Airline deregulation is a bankrupt policy.” Hobart Rowen Washington Post columnist Every major US interstate airline at the time of deregulation in 1978 has since visited bankruptcy court, several more than once. 15 US AIRLINE INDUSTRY NET PROFIT MARGINS 1950-2009 10 5 0 -5 -10 net profit margins net -15 -20 year • 2000 – U.S. profit $2.5 billion • 2001 - U.S. loses $8.3 billion • 2002 - U.S. loses $11.4 billion • 2003 - U.S. loses $1.7 billion • 2004 - U.S. loses $9.1billion • 2005 - U.S. loses $27.2 billion • 2006 - U.S. profit $18.2 billion • 2007 - U.S. profit $7.7 billion • 2008 - U.S. loses $23.8 billion • 2009 - U.S. loses $2.5 billion • 2010 – U.S. profit $3.6 billion US Carriers cumulatively lost $52 billion in this decade. U.S. General Accountability Office • “Structurally, the airline industry is characterized by high fixed costs, cyclical demand for its services, intense competition, and vulnerability to external shocks. As a result, airlines have been more prone to failure than many other businesses, and the sector’s financial performance has continually been very weak . • “Since the 1978 economic deregulation of the U.S. airline industry, airline bankruptcy filings have become prevalent in the United States, and airlines fail at a higher rate than companies in most other industries.” • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Commercial Aviation: Bankruptcy and Pension Problems are Symptoms of Underlying Structural Issues (Sep. -
International Transport Forum Discussion Paper; No
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) EU air transport liberalisation process, impacts and future considerations Burghouwt, G.; Mendes de Leon, P.; de Wit, J. Publication date 2015 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Burghouwt, G., Mendes de Leon, P., & de Wit, J. (2015). EU air transport liberalisation process, impacts and future considerations. (International Transport Forum Discussion Paper; No. 2015-04). International Transport Forum, OECD. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/DiscussionPapers/DP201504.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:03 Oct 2021 EU Air Transport Liberalisation Process, Impacts and Future Considerations Discussion04 Paper 2015• 04 Guillaume Burghouwt SEO Economic Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Pablo Mendes De Leon Universiteit Leiden, the Netherlands Jaap De Wit Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Netherlands EU Air Transport Liberalisation Process, impacts and future considerations Discussion Paper No. -
Air Transport Industry
ANALYSIS OF THE EU AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY Final Report 2006 Contract no: TREN/05/MD/S07.52077 by Cranfield University Department of Air Transport Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.52077. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Transport and Energy DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG ENERGY AND TRANSPORT - LIBRARY (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 BRUSSELS E-MAIL (HTTP://EC.EUROPA.EU/DGS/ENERGY_TRANSPORT/CONTACT/INDEX_EN.HTM) Analysis of the EU Air Transport Industry, 2006 1 CONTENTS 1 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW........................................................................................9 2 REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS.....................................................................................................15 2.1 GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................................................15