DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Azerbaijan Really Shifting Towards Russia?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Azerbaijan Really Shifting Towards Russia? Is Azerbaijan really shifting towards Russia? By Orkhan Hasanov1 TASAM intern Abstract This article is based on Russian-Azerbaijan relations since and change of dynamics coming out of several events that emerged after 2008. The article first touches to Russian-Georgian war that made Azerbaijan reconsider its relations and shift from balance policy to more Russian side. Then it tries to explain Russian efforts on improving its international image that was damaged after 2008 war with Georgia by holding trilateral meetings with Azerbaijan and Armenia, trying to reach agreement on Nagorno-Karabakh problem. Then it will analyze the growing economic relations of the two countries and how Azerbaijan uses its natural resources for approaching Russia in order to make it clear for Turkey and the West that she still pursues independent policy. Azerbaijan’s attitude seemed like that it can turn to Russia when the processes occurring on the South Caucasus are going opposite to the national interests of the country. But in reality the country didn’t aimed increase shift more towards Russian side, in the expense of the deterioration of relations with the West. Finally the article touches Gabala Rl and other issues that influence current relations of the states. Key words: Azerbaijan, Russia, new approach on foreign policy, growing dissatisfaction Introduction Azerbaijan is the largest country in South Caucasus region with more than 9 million population and more than 50 billion GDP, the highest in the region. The country celebrated its 20th anniversary in October 2011. It has neighborhood with Armenia and Georgia-other countries of South Caucasus and 3 major powers-Turkey, Russia and Iran with which it has long historical, religious and cultural ties. Russia has particular role as for about 2 centuries Azerbaijan was part of Russian Empire and then USSR and this had huge effect on formulating the life style, thoughts and vision and even culture of the nation. The relation between the states since collapse of USSR in 1991 was flexible. But after 1993 Haydar Aliyev’s election to presidency this situation changed and stability emerged in the bilateral relations since that time. Also from that time improvement and further development in economic cooperation, trade and political relations was observed. The cooperation accelerated during Ilham Aliyev-the period of fourth president of Azerbaijan. But beginning from 2008 some positives changes emerged in bilateral contacts. Several factors and events that occurred since that 1Orkhan Hasanov is a student in QafqazUniversity and Studies in EAS Faculty, in IR Department (English) in the 4th Course. He studied in MarmaraUniversity, IstanbulTurkey for 1 semester with student exchange program in 2011-2012 study terms. And he had internship in TASAM research center, Istanbul. He gets Presidential grant. His email address: [email protected] or [email protected] 1 time had impacts on the dynamics of relations. Close contacts were the main feature of this period. New trade agreements were signed and high involvement of Russia was seen in the efforts of final resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh problem. Background of bilateral relations Azerbaijan Russian relations passed different complicated periods since independence of Azerbaijan after the collapse of USSR in 1991. Especially during the first 3 years variable foreign policy was observed in Azerbaijan towards Russia and vice versa. Although during the first part of presidency of Ayaz Mutallibov good relations were maintained. After the August events in 1991 in USSR, he supported the coup d’état which took place against Gorbachov-the President of USSR of that period. This event badly damaged the trust between the ruling elites. The deterioration of bilateral ties continued even after he left his post, during the Elchibey’s presidency that lasted from 1992 June till 1993 June. Elchibey’s anti-Russian policy even furthered the deterioration that began from former president. But beginning from the third presidency period, Haydar Aliyev pursued rapprochement policy towards Russia which was essential for Azerbaijan from many aspects. He understood Russia was key factor in the final resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the new small country couldn’t underestimate the big hard power on its neighborhood. With the start of Putin period normalization of Russian attitude towards Azerbaijan observed and further development was achieved. The personal tie between H.Aliyev and Putin was another factor that had impacts on recovering the relations. Russia continued its policy of exclusion of tensions and growing cooperation with Azerbaijan also during Ilham Aliyev period-the fourth President of Azerbaijan since 2003. But Azerbaijan continued its balance policy beginning 1993 towards Russia, not letting the latter to increase its influence on the former. After 2008 the country faced a lot of events that made it to rethink its balance policy and make some steps in favor of Russia. But acted carefully so thatits attempts wouldn’t challenge its long-term policy but give new opportunities to the country to arrange its relations in the world with flexible dynamics. Another factor of this period is start of Dmitry Medvedev’s presidency which began after presidential election, held on 2 March 2008 till new elections that held on 4 March 2012. Medvedev’s efforts as an mediator in the Peace talks of Nagorno-Karabakh was very urgent and there existed hopeful expectations for some period of time during the trilateral dialogues which quickly turn to illusions after Kazan summit. Another main point is bilateral economic and political relations and especially the events that took place since 2008 which caused some visible changes in the economic cooperation. The ties between two countries are essential for national interest of Azerbaijanwithout which the country would have difficulties in securing its growing influence in regional and international sphere and of course it can face huge trouble concerning its territorial problem 2 The relations after 2008 : Five Days’ War There were several factors such as The Georgian-Russian War, US-Russian reset, Global Financial Crisis and Armenian-Turkish rapprochement that reshaped geopolitical situation of the South Caucasus region. Beginning with the first one,“Five days” war just occurred on 8 august-a few months after the elections in Russia, it was the main event that had significant impact on bilateral relations. Geopolitical factors changed attitudes of Russia towards South Caucasus and particular towards Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan began to increaseits political and economicrelations with Russia after the war.It realized that Russia is still a great power in the region that can’t be denied and mainly hard power which can use it if there is need to form stabilization in South Caucasus region. This caused to damage the image of the West in the eyes of Azerbaijan. Western countries especially the USA and Turkey couldn’t do anything to help Georgia-the country that miscalculated by hoping assistance of the west in case of war in Abkhazia and South Ossetia to return the territories. Azerbaijan understood that the West didn’t want to confront with Russia even if there were going talks of Georgia with members of NATO on membership of the country2. Despite the fact that Russia did not take any direct action against Azerbaijan and in fact, tried to mitigate the impact of war through frequent visits by state representatives and frequent mediation in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement, a “fear” of Russia re-emerged in the country.3 Russia again showed its hard power giving message that it could use its military power if there is threat to national interest of the country. In this case violation of international law changed the image of Russia as a giant hard power in the neighborhood of theAzerbaijan. President Ilham Aliyevdidn’t do any speech to support Georgia although letting the Presidents Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania first land in Ganja then go to Tbilisi4 to support Georgia. The official Baku knew that supporting Georgia in such a dangerous situation would harm the ongoing relations with Russia and the same fate that happened on South Ossetia and Abkhazia could also happen with Nagorno- Karabakh. So Azerbaijan began torevaluateits relations with Russia through pursuing its foreign policy more Russian based. At least it is the visible site of the issue. At the core of it lies the wish of Azerbaijan to secure country’s national interests in every situation and uphold sovereignty in international relations.In this context, several attempts towards meeting the wishes of Russia in the region would be the best way. If official Baku quite often mentioned about possibility of war in case of not achieving solution in Nagorno-Karabakh problem after this event such kind of speeches began less heard. Also this war showed Russia extremely aims to see its own model of democracy in the neighborhood, to secure its national interest. The ongoing processes weakened the ability of the West to pressure on Azerbaijan for more liberalization and democratization efforts and caused the country feel more satisfied and less vulnerable of Russian model of democracy in the country. The 2At Bucharest Summit in April 2008, Allied Heads of State and Government agreed that Georgia will become member of NATO, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_38988.htm 3 Valiyev Anar “AZERBAIJAN-RUSSIA RELATIONS AFTER THE FIVE-DAY WAR:FRIENDSHIP, ENMITY, OR PRAGMATISM?” Turkish Policy Quarterly, AZERBAIJAN-RUSSIA: FRIENDSHIP OR ELSE?, ,p.134 (http://www.turkishpolicy.com/dosyalar/files/Anar%20Valiyev(1).pdf) Accessed 04 April 2013 4Cornell, E. Svante “Azerbaijan since Independence” M.E.Sharpe Armonk, New York, London, England,2011 p.353. 3 reason for that was the reduced international image of the Europe and USA as contributors to international peace and stability, due to their inabilities to prevent Russia from using aggression and inability to support Georgia during the war.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Caucasus Globalization
    Volume 6 Issue 2 2012 1 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Conflicts in the Caucasus: History, Present, and Prospects for Resolution Special Issue Volume 6 Issue 2 2012 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 2 Volume 6 Issue 2 2012 FOUNDEDTHE CAUCASUS AND& GLOBALIZATION PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS Registration number: M-770 Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press® Sweden Registration number: 556699-5964 Registration number of the journal: 1218 Editorial Council Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council (Baku) ISMAILOV Tel/fax: (994 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Kenan Executive Secretary (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Azer represents the journal in Russia (Moscow) SAFAROV Tel: (7 495) 937 77 27 E-mail: [email protected] Nodar represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi) KHADURI Tel: (995 32) 99 59 67 E-mail: [email protected] Ayca represents the journal in Turkey (Ankara) ERGUN Tel: (+90 312) 210 59 96 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Nazim Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) MUZAFFARLI Tel: (994 – 12) 510 32 52 E-mail: [email protected] (IMANOV) Vladimer Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Georgia) PAPAVA Tel: (995 – 32) 24 35 55 E-mail: [email protected] Akif Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) ABDULLAEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 6 IssueMembers 2 2012 of Editorial Board: 3 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Zaza D.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMGAYIT – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR
    SUMGAYIT – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR Aslan Ismayilov SUMGAYIT - BEGINNING OF THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR 1 Aslan Ismayilov ЧАШЫОЬЛУ 2011 Aslan Ismayilov Sumgayit – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR Baku Aslan Ismayilov Sumgayit – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR Baku Translated by Vagif Ismayil and Vusal Kazimli 2 SUMGAYIT – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR SUMGAYIT PROCEEDINGS 3 Aslan Ismayilov 4 SUMGAYIT – Beginning of the Collapse of the USSR HOW I WAS APPOINTED AS THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN THE CASE AND OBTAINED INSIGHT OF IT Dear readers! Before I start telling you about Sumgayit events, which I firmly believe are of vital importance for Azerbaijan, and in the trial of which I represented the government, about peripeteia of this trial and other happenings which became echoes and continuation of the tragedy in Sumgayit, and finally about inferences I made about all the abovementioned as early as in 1989, I would like to give you some brief background about myself, in order to demonstrate you that I was not involved in the process occasionally and that my conclusions and position regarding the case are well grounded. Thus, after graduating from the Law Faculty of of the Kuban State University of Russia with honours, I was appointed to the Neftekumsk district court of the Stavropol region as an interne. After the lapse of some time I became the assistant for Mr Krasnoperov, the chairman of the court, who used to be the chairman of the Altay region court and was known as a good professional. The existing legislation at that time allowed two people’s assessors to participate in the court trials in the capacity of judges alongside with the actual judge.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES Policy Division AC/ir Luxembourg, 19 August 2004 NOTE ON THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATION IN AZERBAIJAN AND ITS RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION This note has been drawn up for Members of the European Parliament. Any opinions it may contain are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Parliament. Sources: Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) European Commission Eurostat Oxford Analytica NT\543520EN.doc 1 PE 349.244 CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 3 II. POLITICAL SITUATION .................................................................................................... 4 III. ECONOMIC SITUATION ................................................................................................. 10 IV. RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION .............................................................. 14 ANNEXES For further information, please contact Mr Anthony Comfort, European Parliament, DG 3, Luxembourg, Policy Unit. Tel. (352) 4300 22167, e-mail: [email protected] NT\543520EN.doc 2 PE 349.244 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ruling New Azerbaijan Party (NAP) continues to hold political power. The opposition remains divided and lacks both a charismatic leader and a concrete policy agenda. The poverty of displaced people and the widening disparities in living conditions face Azeris with a choice between social explosion and passivity. It
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Is Still Not Resolved
    WHY IS THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT STILL NOT RESOLVED? Shavarsh Kocharyan Yerevan 2016 Shavarsh Kocharyan Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia since 2008. Associate professor at the faculty of International Relations and Diplomacy of the Yerevan State University. In 1971 he graduated from the State Engineering University (Yerevan), Faculty of Technical Cybernetics, with specialization as Mathematician-Engineer. In 1975 completed his postgraduate studies at the All-Union Scientifi c Research Institute of Genetics (Moscow). In 1977 defended his PhD thesis on Biological sciences. From 1976 to 1990 he worked in the Scientifi c Institutions of Armenia, holding the positions of Associate Scientist, Senior Scientist, Head of Laboratory and Head of Department. He is the author of more than 150 scientifi c works and more than 30 inventions licensed in dozens of countries. In 1990, 1995, 1999 and 2003 he was elected as Member of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia. In the National Assembly he was the member of the Committee on Social, Health and Environmental issues,Committee on European Integration, was elected the Deputy Chairman of Committee on Foreign Relations (1990-1995) and the Chairman of Committee on Scientifi c, Educational, Cultural and Youth issues (1999-2003). He was a member of the delegations of the National Assembly of Armenia to the CIS Parliamentary Assembly (1992-1995 and 1999-2003), the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (1999-2003) and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2003-2005). He was Chairman of the National Democratic Unity (1992-1993), Head of the Parliamentary Group “National Democrats” (1990-1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Policy of the Russian Federation
    Defence policy of the Russian Federation Russia’s emergence as a sovereign state in 1991 led to claimed independence in 2008, Russia refused to recognise turmoil within and the disintegration of Soviet military struc- it, fearing that this case could become a precedent for all tures. Due to mass reduction of personnel, army organisation separatist-tending territories. fell into disarray, the industrial process was disrupted for lack The next escalation of tensions occurred in 2004 with of raw materials or components formerly supplied by other NATO expansion towards south-east Europe. As early as republics and regions, while logistic routes became unviable. 2000, in the previous Military Doctrine, NATO enlargement The political and economic crisis of the transitional period be- was assessed as representing a serious threat to Russia’s tween 1992 and 1999 and the disastrous war in Chechnya security. The question of NATO membership for Ukraine and brought about a far-reaching crisis in the armed forces and Georgia constitutes a red line for Russia. Having very lit- the military-industrial complex. It was not until the end of the tle influence on the current Ukrainian and Georgian political 1990s that the situation began to stabilise. During the decade establishment, Russia opts for harsh arguments when dis- of 1999-2009 the industrial and technological sectors under- cussing their potential membership in NATO: State officials went a large-scale restructuring process which was clearly claim that Ukrainian and Georgian aspirations to join NATO necessary for restoring Russia’s defence capability. could be a perfect justification for the secession of Crimea from Ukraine and the permanent separation from Georgia of THE RELATIONS WITH NATO the breakaway autonomous regions of Abkhazia and South In the latest Military Doctrine of 2010, NATO’s current pol- Ossetia.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-Fourth Session Seventy-Fifth Year Agenda Item 31 Prevention of Armed Conflict
    United Nations A/74/771–S/2020/242 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 March 2020 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-fourth session Seventy-fifth year Agenda item 31 Prevention of armed conflict Letter dated 27 March 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose herewith the memorandum of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) in response to the distortion of facts by Azerbaijan about the events that took place in Kho jalu in February 1992. I kindly request that the present letter and its annex be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 31, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Mher Margaryan Ambassador Permanent Representative 20-04690 (E) 010420 *2004690* A/74/771 S/2020/242 Annex to the letter dated 27 March 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Memorandum of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh In response to the repeated distortion of facts by Azerbaijan about the Khojalu events in February 1992, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh would like to communicate the following: The actions of the defense forces of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic (Republic of Artsakh) aimed at neutralizing the shelling and firing positions of the Azerbaijani armed forces located in Khojalu, as well as at liberating the Stepanakert airport, were in line with the norms and principles of international humanitarian law.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Foreign Relations of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan
    Annals of Global History Volume 1, Issue 2, 2019, PP 4-11 ISSN 2642-8172 Factors Influencing the Foreign Relations of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan Zahra Hosseinpour1, Majid Rafiei2, Abdolreza Alishahi3*, Atieh Mahdipour4 1Master's degree in Executive Master of Business Administration at Tehran University, Tehran, Iran 2Graduate Master of International Relations at Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran 3Ph.D in Political Science at Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran 4Bachelor of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University-South Tehran Branch (EN) *Corresponding Author: Abdolreza Alishahi, Ph.D in Political Science at Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s and the independence of the countries under its control, The Islamic Republic of Iran, on its northern borders, became neighbors with new countries. Azerbaijan is one of those countries that is located in the Caucasus region and declared independence on August 30, 1991, and the Islamic Republic of Iran recognized that country in the same year (1991) and established its relations with this country. During the years of the establishment of relations between the two countries, in spite of the religious and cultural commonalities, as well as the numerous opportunities and economic and security factors that could have exacerbated the interactions between the two sides, These relationships have been practically at a low level, and these joint factors not only did not increase interactions, but in some cases also led to conflicts and tensions between the two countries. According to the background, the question of this research is what factors influenced relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan? The hypothesis of this paper is that the factors affecting the relations between the two countries, Influenced by the negative attitudes of both countries towards each other and the involvement of transnational nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Artush and Zaur – English Translation
    Page 1 ALI AKBAR ARTUSH AND ZAUR (textbook of conflictology for adults) 1 Page 2 If there is a cross in the blood, I watched the reed, I did not find you, you are just a villain, an Armenian. Imadeddin Nasimi 2 Page 3 Azerbaijan, which inspired me with its existence to write and publish the book, With deep gratitude to the masses of Armenia and Georgia. author 3 Page 4 MEETING 4 Page 5 You have made me miserable, O Armenian, I became an Armenian slave in the way of love. 1 Tbilisi greeted him with a golden autumn and a light wind. Dirty concrete from the fourth car of the Baku-Tbilisi train Stepping on the platform, Zaur trembled slightly, lifting the collar of his jacket. Hanging his bag over his shoulder, stepped towards the wide stairs leading to the lower floor. Every time you come to this city, a strange spicy sausage The smell hit his nose. Today, the same smell was mixed with the smell of rainy weather. Similar to Acar khachapuri smoking in small ponds on the platform, unable to decide whether to evaporate in the weak rays of the sun stumps upset. The stumps were reminiscent of white sailing ships that had lost their direction at sea. On the roof of the platform in order The crows scream shamelessly, as if to those who got off the train in the crow dialect of Georgian "Welcome!" - they said. A three-legged dog quickly ran away from Zaur. Apparently, his right hind leg was under the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 9 NO. 12 13 JUNE 2007 Searchable Archives with over 1,000 articles at http://www.cacianalyst.org FEATURE ARTICLE FIELD REPORTS: FOREIGN FIGHTERS AND THE CHECHEN ENDGAME FOR THE CASPIAN STURGEON RESISTANCE: A RE-APPRAISAL Christopher Pala Cerwyn Moore U.S. URGES KYRGYZSTAN TO CONTINUE ANALYTICAL ARTICLES BILATERAL COOPERATION AGAINST TER- RORISM PUTIN’S GABALA GAMBIT: MORE THAN Erica Marat MISSILES Stephen Blank NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV OFFERS UP HIS SON-IN-LAW TO JUSTICE, SEEKS THE GABALA GAMBIT AND PUBLIC FAVOR AZERBAIJAN’S GEOPOLITICS Farkhad Sharip Richard Weitz REMITTANCES AND TAJIKISTAN’S BERDIMUKHAMMEDOV BASES PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT TURKMEN-KAZAKH RELATIONS ON Sergey Medea ‘PRAGMATISM’ Chemen Durdiyeva NEWS DIGEST Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 9 NO. 12 13 JUNE 2007 Contents Feature Article FOREIGN FIGHTERS AND THE CHECHEN RESISTANCE: A RE-APPRAISAL 3 Cerwyn Moore Analytical Articles PUTIN’S GABALA GAMBIT: MORE THAN MISSILES 7 Stephen Blank THE GABALA GAMBIT AND AZERBAIJAN’S GEOPOLITICS 10 Richard Weitz BERDIMUKHAMMEDOV BASES TURKMEN-KAZAKH RELATIONS ON ‘PRAGMATISM’ 13 Chemen Durdiyeva Field Reports ENDGAME FOR THE CASPIAN STURGEON 16 Christopher Pala U.S. URGES KYRGYZSTAN TO CONTINUE BILATERAL COOPERATION AGAINST TERRORISM 17 Erica Marat NURSULTAN NAZARBAYEV OFFERS UP HIS SON-IN-LAW TO JUSTICE, SEEKS PUBLIC FAVOR 19 Farkhad Sharip REMITTANCES AND TAJIKISTAN’S PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT 20 Sergey Medea News Digest 22 THE CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS ANALYST Editor Svante E. Cornell Assistant Editor, News Digest Alima Bissenova Chairman, Editorial Board S. Frederick Starr The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is an English language global Web journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing the Central Asia-Caucasus region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unfreezing of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Through Changes to Azerbaijan’S Security Policy
    DOI: 10.14746/r.2017.2.6 Jarosław KARDAŚ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań The unfreezing of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict through changes to Azerbaijan’s security policy Abstract: Azerbaijan has been transforming its security policy since 2013. For years (since it regained independence), the country’s policies have centered on strategic alliances with Turkey and the West. From 2013 onwards, Azerbaijan has markedly re- stored its strategic partnership with the Russian Federation. The new course, selected in order to adapt to the changed international environment in the South Caucasus, marked Azerbaijan’s definitive departure from the principles of democracy and rule of law. Key words: Azerbaijan, Russian Federation, national security, Nagorno-Karabakh War Introduction he armed clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan that broke out Tin the Nagorno-Karabakh region in early April 2016 were named the Four-Day War. This conflict, which saw the deployment of drones, tanks and artillery, was clearly escalated by Azerbaijan. These four days of clashes left dozens of troops on both sides and a handful of civilians dead. The fighting continued uninterrupted until April 5 and ended with an unexpected ceasefire declared by both the Armenian and Azerbaijani forces (Jarosiewicz, Falkowski, 2016). The author attempts to discover whether the Four-Day War in Na- gorno-Karabakh resulted from a change of Azerbaijan’s security policy. He hypothesizes that Azerbaijan was prompted to unfreeze the Nagorno- Karabakh conflict by transformations in its international environment in the South Caucasus. In his research, the author relies mainly on the deci- sion method (referring to the actions taken by Ilham Aliyev during his presidency) and the historical-genetic method (used to identify the his- torical events, mainly following the early 1990s, that have significantly influenced Azerbaijan’s security strategy since it gained independence).
    [Show full text]
  • The South Caucasus
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 An Uncertain Place In Uncertain Times: The South Caucasus Nathan Burns University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Burns, Nathan, "An Uncertain Place In Uncertain Times: The South Caucasus" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4110. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4110 AN UNCERTAIN PLACE IN UNCERTAIN TIMES: THE SOUTH CAUCASUS by NATHAN L. BURNS B.A. University of Central Florida, 2007 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer 2009 © 2009 Nathan L. Burns ii ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to address how geopolitical factors influence the foreign policies of states in the South Caucasus. Due to the recent Russia-Georgia War, this region is central to contemporary foreign policy, fueling discussions of a New Cold War between the US and Russia. With the explicit goal to provide policy relevant research on this critical region, the South Caucasus states (Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia) are examined in three separate case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Remember Khojali
    WAR KHOJALI A Decade of Useless War Remembered by Thomas Goltz he following is an edited transcript of the 10th Year Khojali Why should they be? In a decade that subsequently saw the vast ethnic Massacre Commemoration presentation delivered by wri t e r cleansings of Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, East Timor and Chechnya, as T Thomas Goltz at the London School of Economics on February well as the slaughterhouse of Rwanda—to name just a few of the killing 26, 2002. This event was organized by the [Azerbaijani] Vatan Society of zones of the pre-September 11 [2001]-World Trade Center bombing “Age the United Kingdom. Mr. Goltz delivered a shorter version of these of Innocence”—the 800 odd victims of Khojali are “but a drop in the remarks on February 21 at a similar commemoration organized by the bloody bucket” of ethnic/national and religious insanity that is the birth- Azerbaijan Society of America (ASA) at the Cannon House Office mark of the so-called post-Communist world. Building in Washington, D.C. Even within the context of Azerbaijan, the numbers killed and displaced If the recent history of the Middle East is any indicator, the sweet cream of victory will eventually s o u r. And the victors of the Nagorno-Karabakh war, alienated from their neighbors, with whom they are condemned to live, may turn out to be the real victims themselves. I have been asked, and thus honored, by friends both inside and outside the government of Azerbaijan to help mark the 10th year commemoration as refugees from Khojali are but a fraction of those eventually killed or of the Massacre at Khojali on February 26th, 1992.
    [Show full text]