DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents 4.0 Description of the Physical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 4.0 Description of the Physical TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT............................................ 4­1 4.1 Geology ................................................................................................. 4­1 4.1.1 Methodology ........................................................................................ 4­1 4.1.2 Regional Geological Formations........................................................... 4­2 4.1.3 Local Geological Units ......................................................................... 4­7 4.1.3.1 Atlantic Coast .......................................................................... 4­7 4.1.3.2 Gatun Locks.............................................................................. 4­8 4.1.3.3 Gatun Lake ............................................................................... 4­9 4.1.3.4 Culebra Cut ......................................................................... ...4­10 4.1.3.5 Pacific Locks ...........................................................................4­11 4.1.3.6 Pacific Coast............................................................................4­12 4.1.4 Paleontological Resources ...................................................................4­13 4.1.5 Geotechnical Characterization .............................................................4­17 4.1.6 Tectonics.............................................................................................4­21 4.2 Geomorphology ..............................................................................................4­22 4.2.1 Local Geomorphology.........................................................................4­24 4.2.2.1 Atlantic Coast ..........................................................................4­24 4.2.2.2 Gatun Locks.............................................................................4­25 4.2.2.3 Gatun Lake ..............................................................................4­25 4.2.2.4 Culebra Cut..............................................................................4­25 4.2.2.5 Pacific Locks ...........................................................................4­26 4.2.2.6 Pacific Coast............................................................................4­26 4.3 Soil Characterization.......................................................................................4­26 4.3.1 Objectives and Methodology ...............................................................4­26 4.3.2 Identification and Description of Soils.................................................4­28 4.3.2.1 Ultisol Soils .............................................................................4­28 4.3.2.2 Alluvial Soils ...........................................................................4­29 4.3.2.3 Sedimentary Origin Soils .........................................................4­30 4.3.2.4 Anthropic Soils ........................................................................4­31 Category III Environmental Impact Study URS Holdings, Inc. Panama Canal Expansion Project – i July 2007 Third Set of Locks 4.3.3 Description of Soil Usage ....................................................................4­32 4.3.3.1 Atlantic Coast ..........................................................................4­32 4.3.3.2 Gatun Locks.............................................................................4­33 4.3.3.3 Gatun Lake ..............................................................................4­34 4.3.3.4 Culebra Cut..............................................................................4­35 4.3.3.5 Pacific Locks ...........................................................................4­36 4.3.3.6 Pacific Coast............................................................................4­37 4.3.4 Delimitation of Property ...................................................................4­38 4.3.5 Usage and Capability ..........................................................................4­39 4.3.5.1 Classification of Soils ..............................................................4­39 4.3.5.2 Atlantic Coast ..........................................................................4­43 4.3.5.3 Gatun Locks.............................................................................4­44 4.3.5.4 Gatun Lake ..............................................................................4­45 4.3.5.5 Culebra Cut..............................................................................4­46 4.3.5.6 Pacific Locks ...........................................................................4­47 4.3.5.7 Pacific Coast............................................................................4­49 4.4 Topography and Bathymetry...........................................................................4­50 4.4.1 Methodology .......................................................................................4­50 4.4.2 Topographic and Bathymetric Characteristics of the Specific Study Area ……………….....................................................................................4­50 4.4.2.1 Atlantic Coast ..........................................................................4­51 4.4.2.2 Gatun Locks.............................................................................4­52 4.4.2.3 Gatun Lake ..............................................................................4­53 4.4.2.4 Culebra Cut..............................................................................4­53 4.4.2.5 Pacific Locks ...........................................................................4­54 4.4.2.6 Pacific Coast............................................................................4­55 4.5 Climate ................................................................................................4­56 4.5.1 Methodology .......................................................................................4­56 4.5.2 Characterization of Climate .................................................................4­58 4.5.2.1 Types of Climate......................................................................4­58 4.5.2.2 Precipitation............................................................................4­59 Category III Environmental Impact Study URS Holdings, Inc. Panama Canal Expansion Project – ii July 2007 Third Set of Locks 4.5.2.3 Temperature.............................................................................4­62 4.5.2.4 Relative Humidity....................................................................4­66 4.5.2.5 Wind Velocity..........................................................................4­70 4.5.2.6 Solar Radiation ........................................................................4­76 4.5.2.7 Potential Evapotranspiration ....................................................4­80 4.6 Hydrology ................................................................................................4­81 4.6.1 General Aspects...................................................................................4­82 4.6.2 Quality Superficial Waters ...................................................................4­83 4.6.2.1 Atlantic Coast ..........................................................................4­83 4.6.2.2 Gatun Locks.............................................................................4­87 4.6.2.3 Gatun Lake ..............................................................................4­88 4.6.2.4 Culebra Cut..............................................................................4­99 4.6.2.5 Pacific Locks .........................................................................4­101 4.6.2.6 Pacific Coast..........................................................................4­104 4.6.3 Volumes (Maximum, Minimum, and Annual Average) .....................4­107 4.6.4 Currents, Tides, and Waves ..............................................................4­108 4.6.4.1 Atlantic Coast ........................................................................4­108 4.6.4.2 Pacific Coast..........................................................................4­109 4.6.5 Underground Waters .........................................................................4­110 4.6.5.1 Characterization of Aquiferous Layers ...................................4­110 4.7 Air Quality……………………………………………………………………4­111 4.7.1 Monitoring Sites and Evaluation Methodology..................................4­112 4.7.1.1 Air Quality Monitoring Activities ..........................................4­112 4.7.1.2 Estimates of Current Emissions .............................................4­115 4.7.2 Results Obtained for Specific Study Area .........................................4­115 4.7.2.1 Atlantic Coast ........................................................................4­118 4.7.2.2 Gatun Locks...........................................................................4­118 4.7.2.3 Gatun Lake ............................................................................4­118 4.7.2.4 Culebra Cut............................................................................4­119 4.7.2.5 Pacific Locks .........................................................................4­119 4.7.2.6 Pacific Coast..........................................................................4­120 Category III Environmental Impact Study URS Holdings, Inc. Panama Canal Expansion Project – iii July 2007 Third Set of Locks 4.8 Noise ..............................................................................................4­120
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soil Reconnaissance of the Panama Canal Zone and Contiguous Territory
    A \. 3~ ·,9 lli!Sii!ii~uufi~iii II TECHNICAL BuLLETIN No. 9-! J A!\U \RY, 1929 SOIL RECONNAISSANCE OF THE PANAMA CANAL ZONE AND CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY BY H. H. BENNETT Soil Scientist, Soil I nvestigations, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils U N ITED STAT ES DEPARTMENT OF A GRICULTURE, \ VASIIINGTON, D. c. U S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1929 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010_with funding from Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/soilreconnaissanOObenn T EcHNICAL BuLLETIN No. 94 j ANUARY, 1929 UNITED STATES DEPARTNIENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. SOIL RECONNAISSANCE OF THE PANAMA CANAL ZONE AND CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY 1 By H. H. BENNETT SoiZ Scient ist, SoiZ I nvestigat ions, Bureau. of Chentistry and Soils CONTENTS Page Page A rea surveyed-------------------- 1 Soils-Continued. Climate------------------------- 2 Savanna clay---------------- 32 Surface features------------------ 5 Ancon stony cl ay ____________ _ 36 Agriculture __ ___________________ _ 7 Catival clay----------------­ 37 Soils---------------------------- 13 Limestone hills--------------- 38 ~1arsh ______________________ _ Frijoles clay----------------­ 20 Alluvium_____ _______________ . 38 Gatun clay-----------------­ 23 38 25 Fills and excaYatcd areas _____ _ 41 Arraijan clay---------------­ San Pablo cl ay ______________ _ Blueficlds clay - -------------­ 28 Coastal sand ___________ ___ __ _ 42 Paraiso clay----------------- 30 43 Santa Rosa clay _____________ _ 30 Summary----------------- ------- 43 .A.lhajuela clay--------------- 32 L iterature cited _________________ _ 45 AREA SURVEYED The Panama Canal Zone comprises a strip of country 10 miles wide and approximately 45 miles long, lengthwise through the center of ''"hich the Panama Canal has been cut. The canal, about 50 miles long from deep ""ater to deep water, crosses the Isthmus of Panan1a in a southeasterly direction from the Caribbean Sea on the Atlantic side to the Gulf of Panama on the Pacific side.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael O. Woodburne1,* Alberto L. Cione2,**, and Eduardo P. Tonni2,***
    Woodburne, M.O.; Cione, A.L.; and Tonni, E.P., 2006, Central American provincialism and the 73 Great American Biotic Interchange, in Carranza-Castañeda, Óscar, and Lindsay, E.H., eds., Ad- vances in late Tertiary vertebrate paleontology in Mexico and the Great American Biotic In- terchange: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología and Centro de Geociencias, Publicación Especial 4, p. 73–101. CENTRAL AMERICAN PROVINCIALISM AND THE GREAT AMERICAN BIOTIC INTERCHANGE Michael O. Woodburne1,* Alberto L. Cione2,**, and Eduardo P. Tonni2,*** ABSTRACT The age and phyletic context of mammals that dispersed between North and South America during the past 9 m.y. is summarized. The presence of a Central American province of cladogenesis and faunal differentiation is explored. One apparent aspect of such a province is to delay dispersals of some taxa northward from Mexico into the continental United States, largely during the Blancan. Examples are recognized among the various xenar- thrans, and cervid artiodactyls. Whereas the concept of a Central American province has been mentioned in past investigations it is upgraded here. Paratoceras (protoceratid artio- dactyl) and rhynchotheriine proboscideans provide perhaps the most compelling examples of Central American cladogenesis (late Arikareean to early Barstovian and Hemphillian to Rancholabrean, respectively), but this category includes Hemphillian sigmodontine rodents, and perhaps a variety of carnivores and ungulates from Honduras in the medial Miocene, as well as peccaries and equids from Mexico. For South America, Mexican canids and hy- drochoerid rodents may have had an earlier development in Mexico. Remarkably, the first South American immigrants to Mexico (after the Miocene heralds; the xenarthrans Plaina and Glossotherium) apparently dispersed northward at the same time as the first Holarctic taxa dispersed to South America (sigmodontine rodents and the tayassuid artiodactyls).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Title
    PANAMA – THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PANAMA CANAL WATERSHED (PCW), CASE #5 This case study is about the Panama Canal Watershed, its development in legal, technical and social terms, the problems encountered, and how an Integrated Water Resources Management approach could help it to be managed in a more sustainable way. ABSTRACT Description The Panama Canal Watershed (PCW) was developed when the Panama Canal was constructed (1904-1914). The PCW unites the basins of the Chagres and Grande Rivers into a single hydraulic system. The Chagres and Grande Rivers drain into the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans, respectively. Damming the Chagres River provides water to operate the canal locks. By the mid 1930’s, an additional lake had been created in the upper basin of the Chagres River to increase the water storage capacity of the system. In 1999, the formal limits of the PCW were established by law and segments of the Indio, Caño Sucio and Coclé del Norte River Basins were added. All these rivers drain separately into the Atlantic Ocean to the north-west of the PCW. Under the Panama Canal Treaty (1977) the Republic of Panama was obliged to provide sufficient water for the operation of the Canal and for cities in the area. This led to the creation of several national parks, the promotion of sustainable development activities, and the implementation of base-line studies, all with support from USAID (United States Agency for International Development). A Panama Canal Authority (PCA) was created by Constitutional reform in 1994 which granted legal obligations and rights to manage the PCW.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonian Plant Fossils a Window Into the Past
    EPPC 2018 Sponsors Academic Partners PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Scientific Committee: Zhe-kun Zhou Angelica Feurdean Jenny McElwain, Chair Tao Su Walter Finsinger Fraser Mitchell Lutz Kunzmann Graciela Gil Romera Paddy Orr Lisa Boucher Lyudmila Shumilovskikh Geoffrey Clayton Elizabeth Wheeler Walter Finsinger Matthew Parkes Evelyn Kustatscher Eniko Magyari Colin Kelleher Niall W. Paterson Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos Benjamin Bomfleur Benjamin Dietre Convenors: Matthew Pound Fabienne Marret-Davies Marco Vecoli Ulrich Salzmann Havandanda Ombashi Charles Wellman Wolfram M. Kürschner Jiri Kvacek Reed Wicander Heather Pardoe Ruth Stockey Hartmut Jäger Christopher Cleal Dieter Uhl Ellen Stolle Jiri Kvacek Maria Barbacka José Bienvenido Diez Ferrer Borja Cascales-Miñana Hans Kerp Friðgeir Grímsson José B. Diez Patricia Ryberg Christa-Charlotte Hofmann Xin Wang Dimitrios Velitzelos Reinhard Zetter Charilaos Yiotis Peta Hayes Jean Nicolas Haas Joseph D. White Fraser Mitchell Benjamin Dietre Jennifer C. McElwain Jenny McElwain Marie-José Gaillard Paul Kenrick Furong Li Christine Strullu-Derrien Graphic and Website Design: Ralph Fyfe Chris Berry Peter Lang Irina Delusina Margaret E. Collinson Tiiu Koff Andrew C. Scott Linnean Society Award Selection Panel: Elena Severova Barry Lomax Wuu Kuang Soh Carla J. Harper Phillip Jardine Eamon haughey Michael Krings Daniela Festi Amanda Porter Gar Rothwell Keith Bennett Kamila Kwasniewska Cindy V. Looy William Fletcher Claire M. Belcher Alistair Seddon Conference Organization: Jonathan P. Wilson
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Some Panama Canal Zone Birds with Special Reference to Their Food
    304 HxL.NxN,Notes on Panama Birds. [April[Auk NOTES ON SOME PANAMA CANAL ZONE BIRDS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THEIR FOOD. BY THOMAS HALLINAN. OBSERVATIONSwere made on the occurrence and the food, nestingand generalhabits of 440 collectedspecimens, including 159 species. The specimenshave beendeposited in the AmericanMuseum of Natural History, in New York City, and the identificationswere made by Mr. W. deW. Miller who has remarkableability as a taxonomist. The scientificpermit to collectthese birds was issuedby Gover- nor GeorgeW. Goethals. His administration, by enforcingthe existinglaws, on the Panama Canal Zone, providedprotection to the birdsand it hasmade this territory as desirableto the avifauna as someof the remote,uninhabited regions on the Isthmus. In the field work I had extensive aid from several men whose resourcefulnessand persistencyadded largely to the observations and their names,following, I subscribewith plcasurc.--Mr. Elliott F. Brown, Balboa, Canal Zone; Mr. Albert Horle, Cristobal, Canal Zone; Mr. Ernest Peterkin, United States Navy; Mr. P. T. Sealcy, New York City; Mr. Ezekiel Arnott Smith, Hartford, Conn.;and Mr. JoselibW. Smith,Sisson, Calif. The followinglist locatesthe stations,mentioned in this paper, with reference to the Panama Canal:-- Ancon Hill.--Near the Pacific entrance of the Canal. Balboa.--Near the Pacific entrance of the Canal. Casa Largo.--About 10 miles northeastof the junction of the ChagresRiver and the Canal, on the Atlantic Slope. Corozal.--Near the Pacific entrance of the Canal. Culcbra-ArraijanTrail.--gunning about 6 miles south, on the PacificSlope, from Culebraon the ContinentalDivide. Darien Radio Station.--On the Canal, about 22 miles from the Atlantic entrance,on the Atlantic Slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: What Have We Already Observed?
    Water resources and ecosystem services examples from Panamá, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela Matthew C. Larsen Director Ecosystem services from forested watersheds mainly product and goods - water resources - wood products - biodiversity, genetic resources, enhanced resilience to wildfire, pathogens, invasive species - recreation, ecotourism - reduced peak river flow during storms - increased availability of groundwater and base flow in streams during dry annual dry season & droughts - reduced soil erosion and landslide probability - buffer to storm surge and tsunamis [forested coastlines] Ecosystem service challenges Land use and governance - deforestation - forest fragmentation - increased wildfire frequency - urban encroachment on forest margins Climate-change - temperature & precipitation, both averages & extremes - intensity, frequency, duration of storms & droughts - sea level rise - rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration Climate change: What have we already observed? - 1983 to 2012: warmest 30-year period of last 1400 years northern hemisphere - 1880 to 2012: globally averaged air temps over land & 1928 ocean show warming of 0.85 °C - since 1901: increase in average mid-latitude northern hemisphere land area precipitation - 1979 to 2012: annual mean Arctic sea-ice extent decreased 3.5 to 4.1% per decade 2003 - 1901 to 2010: global mean sea level rose 0.19 m - since mid-19th century: rate of sea level rise has been larger than mean rate during previous 2000 years 2010 Source: IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core South Cascade Glacier, U.S Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Project JYP-1104 SALT INTRUSION in GATUN LAKE a Major Qualifying
    Project JYP-1104 SALT INTRUSION IN GATUN LAKE A Major Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Assel Akhmetova Cristina Crespo Edwin Muñiz March 11, 2012 Jeanine D. Plummer, Major Advisor Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering 1. Gatun Lake 2. Salt Intrusion 3. Panama Canal Abstract The expansion of the Panama Canal is adding another lock lane to the canal, allowing passage of larger ships. Increases in the number of transits and the size of the locks may displace more salt from the oceans into the freshwater lake, Gatun Lake, which is a drinking water source for Panama City. This project evaluated future salinity levels in Gatun Lake. Water quality and hydrometeorological data were input into a predictive hydrodynamic software package to project salinity levels in the lake after the new lock system is completed. Modeling results showed that salinity levels are expected to remain in the freshwater range. In the event that the lake becomes brackish, the team designed a water treatment plant using electrodialysis reversal for salt removal and UV light disinfection. ii Executive Summary The Panama Canal runs from the Pacific Ocean in the southeast to the Atlantic Ocean in the northwest over a watershed area containing the freshwater lake, Gatun Lake. The canal facilitates the transit of 36 ships daily using three sets of locks, which displace large volumes of water into and out of Gatun Lake. The displacement of water has the potential to cause salt intrusion into the freshwater Gatun Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Panama Canal: It's All About Connectivity
    The Panama Canal: It’s all about connectivity Panama at a glance GDP growth rate – last 10 years 7.5% GDP estimated- 2013 (dollars) 38,6b GDP per capita - 2013 estimated (in dollars) 13,032 Population (million) 3.5 Unemployment rate (in %) 4.0 Inflation rate - 2013 (in %) 4.08 It’s all about Connectivity • 144 trade routes • 1,700 ports • 160 countries The Panama Canal’s value added service The Panama Canal Service Package Economies of Scale Connectivity Sustainability Reliability Reliability • Opens 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year • Safe and secure • 98% customer satisfaction • Strikes not allowed by law; only two closures in its history • Predictability: Published tariffs and fixed transit date with reservation TIME AND DISTANCE SAVINGS ALTERNATE ROUTES PANAMA CANAL SUEZ CAPE HORN CAPE OF GOOD HOPE DAYS DISTANCE DAYS DISTANCE DAYS DISTANCE DAYS DISTANCE East and Gulf Coast US - Asia 20.0 9,640 29.5 14,178 35.6 17,112 31.6 15,417 West Coast South America – 7.3 3,351 43.3 19,776 21.3 9,753 43.1 19,693 East Coast US West Coast South America - 14.1 6,433 39.8 18,184 22 10,506 42.3 19,321 Europe West Coast US - Europe 17.5 8,005 35.5 16,210 30 13,702 42.4 19,385 West Coast Central America – 6.3 2,900 43.2 19,756 24.9 11,379 44.4 20,299 East Coast US Source: Fairplay Distance Table Speed: 20 knots Distance from point to point, travel days without considering port calls Sustainability PanamaCapacity: Canal - 2015 Existing Canal: 330m PC/UMS tons Expanded Canal: 600m PC/UMS tons Expansion Program Components Atlantic Site Post-
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Patrol Aviation: 90 Years of Continuing Innovation
    J. F. KEANE AND C. A. EASTERLING Maritime Patrol Aviation: 90 Years of Continuing Innovation John F. Keane and CAPT C. Alan Easterling, USN Since its beginnings in 1912, maritime patrol aviation has recognized the importance of long-range, persistent, and armed intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance in sup- port of operations afl oat and ashore. Throughout its history, it has demonstrated the fl ex- ibility to respond to changing threats, environments, and missions. The need for increased range and payload to counter submarine and surface threats would dictate aircraft opera- tional requirements as early as 1917. As maritime patrol transitioned from fl ying boats to land-based aircraft, both its mission set and areas of operation expanded, requiring further developments to accommodate advanced sensor and weapons systems. Tomorrow’s squad- rons will possess capabilities far beyond the imaginations of the early pioneers, but the mis- sion will remain essentially the same—to quench the battle force commander’s increasing demand for over-the-horizon situational awareness. INTRODUCTION In 1942, Rear Admiral J. S. McCain, as Com- plane. With their normal and advance bases strategically mander, Aircraft Scouting Forces, U.S. Fleet, stated the located, surprise contacts between major forces can hardly following: occur. In addition to receiving contact reports on enemy forces in these vital areas the patrol planes, due to their great Information is without doubt the most important service endurance, can shadow and track these forces, keeping the required by a fl eet commander. Accurate, complete and up fl eet commander informed of their every movement.1 to the minute knowledge of the position, strength and move- ment of enemy forces is very diffi cult to obtain under war Although prescient, Rear Admiral McCain was hardly conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura)
    Porcellanid Crabs from the Coasts of Mexico and Central America (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) ROBERT H. GORE m wtu. SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 363 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • First North American Fossil Monkey and Early Miocene Tropical Biotic Interchange Jonathan I
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature17415 First North American fossil monkey and early Miocene tropical biotic interchange Jonathan I. Bloch1, Emily D. Woodruff1,2, Aaron R. Wood1,3, Aldo F. Rincon1,4, Arianna R. Harrington1,2,5, Gary S. Morgan6, David A. Foster4, Camilo Montes7, Carlos A. Jaramillo8, Nathan A. Jud1, Douglas S. Jones1 & Bruce J. MacFadden1 New World monkeys (platyrrhines) are a diverse part of modern Primates Linnaeus, 1758 tropical ecosystems in North and South America, yet their early Anthropoidea Mivart, 1864 evolutionary history in the tropics is largely unknown. Molecular Platyrrhini Geoffroy, 1812 divergence estimates suggest that primates arrived in tropical Cebidae Bonaparte, 1831 Central America, the southern-most extent of the North American Panamacebus transitus gen. et sp. nov. landmass, with several dispersals from South America starting with the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama 3–4 million years Etymology. Generic name combines ‘Panama’ with ‘Cebus’, root taxon ago (Ma)1. The complete absence of primate fossils from Central for Cebidae. Specific name ‘transit’ (Latin, crossing) refers to its implied America has, however, limited our understanding of their history early Miocene dispersal between South and North America. in the New World. Here we present the first description of a fossil Holotype. UF 280128, left upper first molar (M1; Fig. 2a, b). monkey recovered from the North American landmass, the oldest Referred material. Left upper second molar (M2; UF 281001; Fig. 2a, b), known crown platyrrhine, from a precisely dated 20.9-Ma layer in partial left lower first incisor (I1; UF 280130), right lower second the Las Cascadas Formation in the Panama Canal Basin, Panama.
    [Show full text]