DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Assembly Wednesday 13 June 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Assembly Wednesday 13 June 2018 Wednesday 13 June 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m. and read Prayers. QUESTIONS Child Safety Service Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HUMAN SERVICES, Mr JAENSCH [10.02 a.m.] The information provided in these right to information documents you released yesterday is deeply shameful and shocking. They show that on any given day between 1 October last year and 5 April this year, only nine weeks ago, up to 500 Tasmanian children potentially at risk of harm were lost in the child safety system because they had been assigned to officers who had left the system, assigned to team leaders who are not supposed to have responsibility for individual cases, or had not been allocated to an officer at all. This information was released to Labor late yesterday afternoon following your announcement of additional funding to child safety in the morning. Did you make that announcement only because you knew this astonishing and unacceptable news was coming? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for her question. Members interjecting. Madam SPEAKER - Order. Mr JAENSCH - The answer to the last question was no. Regarding the matters referred to earlier - Members interjecting. Madam SPEAKER - Order. There is very childish behaviour going across the Chamber and I want it to stop. Please let the minister address the question. Mr JAENSCH - With regard to the broader topic, nothing is more important than the safety and wellbeing of our most vulnerable children here in Tasmania. Those opposite and members of the Greens who have been involved in these portfolios before will know that while a case may not be registered on the information system as allocated, or where it is allocated to a team leader, it does not mean that that case or children associated with that case are not receiving oversight or appropriate case management. Also noting, as the Opposition will, that total numbers fluctuate widely and daily and are not cumulative indicates that there is strong through flow and the numbers go up and down every day. It does not mean that individual cases remain allocated day after day. However, we know and acknowledge that demand on our child safety system is increasing here, as it is across Australia at the moment. That is why our Government is investing $24 million in tomorrow's budget into 1 13 June 2018 additional child safety workers to share the load and for the further implementation of the redesign of the child safety system started in our first term of government so we can reach out to more kids and more families before child safety becomes an issue. Child Safety Service Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HUMAN SERVICES, Mr JAENSCH [10.06 a.m.] This data, obtained under right to information shows, as recently as April this year, children in danger were allocated to child protection workers who do not exist. Can you guarantee this practice has stopped and that it will never happen again? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the member for her question. As at 7 June, my latest written briefing on this, there are no cases allocated to staff who have left the employment of the Child Safety Service. Following a child safety officer resigning and leaving the Child Safety Service, there is a requirement for their case load to be reallocated to another staff member. This process does not usually take more than a week to occur. While there have been a small number of cases that have taken longer than a week to reallocate, all these cases were overseen by the child safety manager, which included undertaking or delegating court work or case work tasks. It is important to note when a child safety officer leaves the service, discussion is undertaken with their team leader to ensure urgent matters are appropriately handed over and they work as a team to ensure appropriate transition of matters to other staff where there is immediate capacity to do so. It is time for Labor to stop playing politics with children's safety. Short-Stay Accommodation Ms O'CONNOR question to PREMIER, Mr HODGMAN [10.07 a.m.] Are you aware of the UTAS Institute for Social Changes' recently released research that demonstrates the significant and still growing impact of the short stay accommodation market on rental availability and affordability? The data reveals that between July 2016 and February 2018 an extra 2200 properties were listed on Airbnb and it is clear we have not yet reached peak Airbnb. The report confirms the majority of these listings are whole properties that would otherwise have been available for rental to Tasmanians. Further, the report states that the growth in Airbnb is driving up rents. Do you agree a pause on new permits is needed? What is your Government's plan to rein in the explosion of Airbnb at the expense of Tasmanians needing a home? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the member for the question. Yes, I am aware of the body of work to which she refers. It is a piece of work that can inform policy decisions and ensure they are based 2 13 June 2018 on evidence, facts and data. It is one of the reasons why, following our housing summit, we have also sought to have short-stay accommodation providers contribute to an audit of properties currently utilised or that may be utilised in that form to truly understand the extent of the issue to which the member refers. It is one element of our housing market and it is simplistic for anyone to suggest it is in isolation the reason for homelessness or housing stress. It is one element we are addressing as a government and will continue to do so, including as recently as last week, responding to the TPC findings and recommendations to ensure the decisions we make are based on evidence, facts and data, not just on a hunch. The Leader of the Greens, who asked the question, by her own admission, was reported in the paper the other day as saying, 'It is not going to fix the problem.' It is acknowledged this will not address all issues. It is one element. There is work being done. I understand comments this morning on the radio from peak organisations who are calling for the state, government and community to ensure that our decisions are based on evidence to make sure that we are properly informed. Dr Woodruff - This is evidence. Mr HODGMAN - It is one perspective. In our view it is not necessarily conclusive or all the evidence that we should get as a government to make the right decisions. I note the other element of the coalition now chipping in because it is another one of their simplistic responses to a complex policy issue. It is easy in opposition to be all care and no responsibility. Governments should base their decisions, not on hunches or anecdotal evidence or whatever might have a political ring to it, but what will make a material difference. That is what we are doing. Ms O'Connor - It is hard data. Mr HODGMAN - It requires the right data and sensible analysis. There does seem to be a shift in policy position by the Greens who are becoming increasingly more aligned and familiar with their coalition partners, the Labor Party, when you do not know what they stand for or what they believe. Cheap political points is obviously something you believe in and you are keen on. Believing in your policy positions seems to be getting more confusing by the day. I pointed out the hypocrisy of the Greens yesterday with former Senator Brown happily wanting to fly across wilderness areas that he wants no one else to have access to. I inform the House of what was previously Greens policy position on this very subject. Former Greens leader, Nick McKim, in this place back in 2015, lauded the benefits of the sharing economy. He said it is turning a generation of interconnected people into entrepreneurs. There is more he said that is of some interest. Greens Senator Nick McKim said in his inaugural speech in the federal parliament, and I quote - The opportunities that come - from the sharing economy - 3 13 June 2018 will shift people away from welfare and into economic independence. The free- flow of information and data will protect consumers and reduce regulatory burden on governments, freeing up more money for the delivery of essential public services. Ms O'CONNOR - Point of order, Madam Speaker. It goes to relevance. There are people sleeping on the Domain at the moment and the Premier is citing a speech from three years ago and not going to the issue. Liberal members are laughing during a question about the housing crisis. Madam SPEAKER - Premier, please confine your debate to the current question. Mr HODGMAN - Thank you, Madam Speaker. With respect, it is. It goes to Greens policy on this issue. Today they are going to argue that we should suddenly freeze any activity in this space. Three years ago, Greens Leader Senator Nick McKim said - Ms O'CONNOR - Point of order, Madam Speaker. The Premier has misrepresented the question. We are talking about whole properties and a pause on whole properties being listed so that people are not shut out of the rental market. Listen to the question. Mr BARNETT - Madam Speaker, on the point of order, it is clearly not a point of order. She is debating the argument, debating the motion. She has made no reference to a standing order.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPBC Act Referral
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2021/8909 - South Marionoak Tailings Storage Facility, Rosebery, Tasmania Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The proposed action is the construction and operation of a new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at South Marionoak (SMO) in proximity to Rosebery, Tasmania within the West Coast municipality (South Marionoak TSF). The South Marionoak TSF will form part of the MMG Rosebery mine operations and will allow for piping and disposal of tailings resulting from the processing plant. The proposed South Marionoak TSF will provide long term essential tailings storage for the Rosebery Mine. Rosebery Mine has operated continuously since 1936 as an underground polymetallic base metal mine with a capacity to produce up to 1,100,000 tonnes of ore per year. Rosebery produces zinc, copper and lead concentrates, as well as gold ore. The mine has used the Bobadil TSF, situated approximately 2.5 km north of the mine, and 2/5 Dam TSF situated approximately 1 km south of the mine. The TSFs are expected to reach capacity within the next few years, and a new TSF will be required to support the mine’s ongoing operation. The South Marionoak TSF has been designed as an off-stream facility with storage volume of approximately 25 Mm3 and an anticipated lifespan of around 42 years (based on current tailings production rates).
    [Show full text]
  • Provision of Professional Services Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study TRIM File No.: 039909/002 Brief No.: 1280-3-19 Project No.: A130013.002
    Provision of Professional Services Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study TRIM File No.: 039909/002 Brief No.: 1280-3-19 Project No.: A130013.002 Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study FINAL REPORT May 2012 Sinclair Knight Merz 100 Melville St, Hobart 7000 GPO Box 1725 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Tel: +61 3 6221 3711 Fax: +61 3 6224 2325 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Final Report Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction and background 13 1.1. Strategic background 13 1.2. Policy and planning framework 14 1.3. This report 15 1.4. Approach adopted 16 2. Report 1: Infrastructure audit report 17 2.1. Introduction 17 2.2. Road Infrastructure 17 2.2.1. Roads Policy and Planning Context 17 2.2.2. Major Road Corridor 20 2.2.2.1. Anthony Main Road (DIER) 20 2.2.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Draft
    Our ref: DOC/20/103916 Officer: Samuel McCrossen Phone: 03 6165 6833 Email: [email protected] 20 January 2021 Mr David Midson General Manager West Coast Council PO Box 63 QUEENSTOWN TAS 7467 By email: [email protected] Dear Mr Midson, West Coast Draft Local Provisions Schedule (LPS) A hearing is to be held on the representations made in relation to the West Coast draft LPS and the recommendations in planning authority’s report under section 35F of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 (the section 35F report). The hearing has been scheduled for Monday 15 February 2021 (and Tuesday 16 February 2021 if required), commencing at 10am, at the Commission Office, Level 3, 144 Macquarie Street, Hobart. A full schedule of the nominated matters and hearing dates is included at Attachment A, which provides guidance on which hearing sessions are intended to be relevant to each representation. I also refer to matters raised in the representations and the planning authority’s section 35F report, including recommendations on the representations. Preliminary consideration of the representations and the section 35F report recommendations on the merit of each representation has identified that there are a number issues that the Commission seeks further information about from the planning authority and specific representors prior to the hearing. The directions on these matters are set out in the attached directions schedule (Attachment B). Please submit your responses to [email protected] by the due dates specified in the schedule. Once received, the submissions referred to above will be made available on the Commission’s website at the following link: LPS-WCO-TPS – Tasmanian Planning Commission Website1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bluestone Mines Tasmania Joint Venture Pty Ltd (BMTJV), Who Manages Renison on Behalf of the Joint Venture Partners
    Bluestone Mines Tasmania Joint Venture Renison Tin Mine Paste Backfill Plant Traffic Impact Assessment February 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) 4 1.3 Statement of Qualification and Experience 5 1.4 Project Scope 5 1.5 Subject Site 5 1.6 Reference Resources 7 2. Existing Conditions 8 2.1 Transport Network 8 2.2 Road Safety Performance 11 2.3 Existing Mine Operations 12 3. Proposed Development 14 3.1 Development Proposal 14 4. Traffic Impacts 15 4.1 Traffic Generation 15 4.2 Trip Distribution 16 4.3 Access Impacts 16 4.4 Sight Distance 17 4.5 Internal Road Network 17 4.6 Road Safety Impacts 18 5. Parking Assessment 19 5.1 Planning Scheme Requirements 19 5.2 Parking Provision 19 6. Conclusions 20 2 Figure Index Figure 1 BMTJV Site Access and Internal Road Network 6 Figure 2 Murchison Seasonal Traffic Volume 9 Figure 3 Internal Road Near PBP Entry 10 Figure 4 Internal Road Near PBP Exit 11 Figure 5 Crash Locations 12 Figure 6 Existing Murchison Highway Site Access 16 Table Index Table 1 Murchison Highway Traffic Volume Summary 8 3 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Midson Traffic were engaged by Bluestone Mines Tasmania Joint Venture (BMTJV) Pty Ltd to prepare a traffic impact assessment for the proposed construction and operation of a proposed paste backfill plant (PBP) adjacent to the existing tin process plant at Renison Tin Mine. 1.2 Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) A traffic impact assessment (TIA) is a process of compiling and analysing information on the impacts that a specific development proposal is likely to have on the operation of roads and transport networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasrail), Was Established by an Act of the Tasmanian Parliament (Rail Company Act 2009)
    Productivity Commission Initial Submission December 2013 File No: PC_0012013Page 1 of 9 Pictured: Brighton Transport Hub: Logs being prepared for rail haulage to Date: 11/12/2013 Bell Bay and general containerised freight departing to Burnie Port. Background On 1 December 2009 a new State-owned company, Tasmanian Railway Pty Ltd (TasRail), was established by an Act of the Tasmanian Parliament (Rail Company Act 2009). TasRail was created by combining the Below Rail assets (track and associated infrastructure), for which the Tasmanian Government had assumed responsibility in 2007, with the Above Rail assets (rolling stock, workshops, depots) and business assets purchased from Pacific National late in 2009. This completed the amalgamation of the whole operating rail network within Tasmania, and importantly, enabled TasRail to operate as a vertically integrated rail freight business. At the time of its establishment, it was well documented that TasRail had inherited a business characterised by many decades of capital under-investment. This had critically constrained the ability of rail to contribute to the business development of the State and led to increased volumes of freight being transferred to the road network. As investment in rail has occurred since the new company has been established, TasRail is rapidly transitioning from the Rail Rescue to the Revitalization phase with new customers, growing volumes, improved Below Rail infrastructure and new rolling stock all well advanced. Current Situation Rebuilding the Below Rail Network The Australian and Tasmanian Governments recognised that, similar to the road network, the Below Rail Network is critical infrastructure that requires sufficient funding to ensure appropriate maintenance, operational and safety standards.
    [Show full text]
  • An Index and List of Back Issues
    TASMANIAN RAIL NEWS BACK ISSUES — ISSUES 161–255 Tasmanian Rail News was first published as the News Sheet of the Tasmanian Subdivision of the ARHS in August 1965, Issue 1 being released as duplicated and typed sheets. From Issue 1 to Issue 150, TRN remained as duplicated or photocopied sheets, sometimes with plans, diagrams or poor standard photographs. Since Issue 151, TRN has been commercially printed with better quality photographs, and with a content of about 50% current affairs and 50% historic articles or reports on recent events. The following back issues are available unless otherwise noted. All prices include postage. How to order Orders and payments (by cheque or money order) should be sent to: Secretary ARHS Tasmania PO Box 162 Sandy Bay Tasmania 7006 Updated 19 February 2015 161 — April 1988 (Out of print) Streamlined trains in Tasmania; steam locomotives at Hobart 1955–1974; Notes on Kings Wharf branch. Cover photo: Locos MA2-CCS23 with special passenger train on Pieman River bridge, EBR on 17/4/1988. 162 — July 1988 (Out of print) Tasrail’s 100+ diesels; Hellyer siding history; steam locomotives at Hobart 1955-1974 part 2. Cover photo: EBR diesel hydraulic loco No.21 at Burnie 23/10/1981. 163 — Oc tober 1988 (Out of print) Locomotives and railcars at Launceston loco depot 8/11/1953; rebuilds and alterations made to TGR steam locomotives; E class boilers; story behind cover photo of TRN159; list of stations and sidings Launceston Wharf, Northeast and Bell Bay lines. Cover: Sectioned side elevation of C class engine unit. 164 — Janu ary 1989 (Out of print) Tasrail activities per ANR 1987/88 annual report; TGR locomotive tenders; report on Main Line Railway Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing the Tarkine
    Valuing the Tarkine: A Systematic Quantification of Optimal Land Use and Potential Conflict Compromise by Jennifer Diana Evans BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Institute for Regional Development and School of Land and Food A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, October 2016 Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Signature Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date 26 October, 2016 ii Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signature Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date 26 October, 2016 iii Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. Signature: Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date: 26 October, 2016 iv Abstract Ecosystems continue to deplete as global demand for natural resources force land use change and cause environmental conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Tasmania Export Corridor Plan Department of State Growth
    Western Tasmania Export Corridor Plan Department of State Growth Report IS106100-O-TS-RP-E4-0001 | 11 1 August 2016 RFT 2256 Repor t Depar tme nt of State Grow th Report Western Tasmania Export Corridor Plan Project no: IS106100 Document title: Report Document No.: IS106100-O-TS-RP-E4-0001 Revision: 11 Date: 1 August 2016 Client name: Department of State Growth Client no: RFT 2256 Project manager: Kathryn Easther Author: Steve Manders / Kathryn Easther File name: C:\users\keasther\appdata\local\projectwise\jacobs_anz_ie\dms18589\Western Tasmania Export Corridor Plan Report Final.docx Jacobs Australia Pty Limited 100 Melville St, Hobart 7000 GPO Box 1725 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia T +61 3 6221 3711 F +61 3 6221 3766 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs Australia Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Commercial in confidence information: The information in this report has been collected through detailed interviews with industry, peak organisations and infrastructure providers. The information collected includes both business-related data and the confidential views of participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Transport Tasmania Bathurst St PO Box 4515 Hobart TAS 7000 July 2015 Submisssion to Legislative Council Enquiry Into Tasrail 2015
    Future Transport Tasmania Bathurst St PO Box 4515 Hobart TAS 7000 July 2015 Submisssion to Legislative Council enquiry into Tasrail 2015 In reference to the above inquiry Future Transport Tasmania (FTT) would like to submit the following to the committee: Future Transport Tasmania is a community group with non-financial members across the state. FTT finds that the terms of reference contain unusual wording which appear either designed deliberately to mask intent, or to have specific negative assumptions. On this basis, FTT submits that it may not be possible for this inquiry to produce an objective set of recommendations. FTT will refer to these issues within this document. FTT is not in a position to fund financial or economic studies and is therefore unable to offer advice or comment on specific financial arrangements of Tasrail. However, FTT believes that a review of the relevant history of the Tasmanian Railways would be prudent, so as to ensure that the committee members are fully conversant with the current situation. This is because past events have had a direct bearing on the present circumstances. A Brief History of Tasmania’s railways Tasmania’s main line from Hobart to Launceston was originally constructed by a private company owned by investors in London. In an ironic twist of repeating history the Tasmanian Main Line Railway Company was purchased by the Tasmanian Government after a string of derailments and complaints. The Tasmanian Government Railways (TGR) ran at a loss for virtually its entire existence. We wish to caution the committee that this financial position however does not necessarily reflect the full benefits provided by rail services that existed over that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009/10 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources
    Annual Report 2009/10 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources COVER IMAGE: KINGSTON BYPASS A contract for the construction of the $41.5 million Kingston Bypass was signed in February and an official sod-turning ceremony was held later the same month. Once completed the 2.8 kilometre bypass will ease congestion in and around Kingston, providing motorists with a quicker, safer trip. The final design was the result of an extensive community consultation process. • Pictured at the sod-turning ceremony with their shovels at the ready are (from left) Franklin Federal MP Julie Collins, Deputy Premier Lara Giddings, Federal Infrastructure and Transport Minister Anthony Albanese, the then Tasmanian Infrastructure Minister Graeme Sturges and the Mayor of Kingborough, Dr Graham Bury. October 2010 Hon Lara Giddings, MP Minister for Infrastructure Parliament House HOBART 7000 Hon Bryan Green, MP Minister for Energy and Resources Minister for Racing Parliament House HOBART 7000 Hon Nick McKim, MP Minister for Sustainable Transport and Alternative Energy Parliament House HOBART 7000 Dear Ministers In accordance with Section 36 of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I am pleased to submit for your information and presentation to Parliament, the Annual Report of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources for the year ended 30 June 2010. The Financial Statements and the certificate of the Auditor-General are included. The Annual Report of the Director of Energy Planning, required under Section 13 of the Energy Coordination and Planning Act 1995 and the Report and Financial Statements of the Abt Railway Ministerial Corporation, required under Section 31 of the Abt Railway Development Act 1999, are also included.
    [Show full text]
  • Living on the Coast – the Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework
    LLIIVVIINNGG OONN TTHHEE CCOOAASSTT THE CRADLE COAST REGIONAL LAND USE PLANNING FRAMEWORK Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Strategy 2010 - 2030 CRADLE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING INITIATIVE Living on the Coast Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework 1 Living on the Coast Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework CRADLE COAST REGIONAL LAND USE PLANNING FRAMEWORK The Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework provides a regional perspective on land use planning issues of significance for all the municipal areas within the Cradle Coast Region of northwest Tasmania. The Framework has been agreed by each of the councils for the nine municipal areas forming the Cradle Coast Region. The Framework contains the Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Strategy 2010 - 2030. The Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Strategy 2010 - 2030 is a statutory planning instrument under the Tasmanian Resource Management and Planning System. Purpose of the Strategy is to provide a consistent policy foundation for the regulatory intentions and requirements contained in local planning schemes prepared for each municipal area. 2 Living on the Coast Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework Living on the Coast – The Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework Table of Contents Minister’s Vision 5 Part C Executive Summary 6 Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Strategy 2010 - 2030 Part A About the Cradle Coast Regional 1.0 Implementation 117 Land Use Planning Framework 1.1 Purpose 117 1.2 Structure 118 Introduction 9 1.3 Statutory Status 118 1.0 Preparation
    [Show full text]
  • Living on the Coast
    LLIIVVIINNGG OONN TTHHEE CCOOAASSTT CRADLE COAST REGIONAL LAND USE PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2010 – 2030 CONSULTATION DRAFT CRADLE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING INITIATIVE December 2010 Living on the Coast Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework 2010- 2030 CONSULTATION DRAFT The Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework – Consultation Draft has been endorsed by each of the Councils of the Cradle Coast Region as suitable for community consideration and comment. The principles and polices contained in this document are draft only. The acceptability or otherwise of the draft Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Strategy as contained in this document for declaration by the Minister pursuant to s30C Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 will be determined following consideration of representations made during the exhibition period. While every endeavour has been made to ensure the accuracy of material contained in this document, the State of Tasmania, the Cradle Coast Authority, and each of the Councils of the Cradle Coast Region, their agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or part of this document. This document may be downloaded from the following websites www.burnie.net www.centralcoast.tas.gov.au www.circularhead.tas.gov.au www.cradlecoast.com www.dcc.tas.gov.au www.kentish.tas.gov.au www.kingisland.tas.gov.au www.latrobe.tas.gov.au www.planning.tas.gov.au www.warwyn.tas.gov.au www.westcoast.tas.gov.au Comment in writing on any matter in the draft Framework will be received in writing before 5.00pm on Monday 28th February 2011 and addressed to – Cradle Coast Regional Planning Initiative PO Box 338 Burnie TAS 7320 By email to - [email protected] Online - www.cradlecoast.com Living on the Coast – The Cradle Coast Regional Land Use Planning Framework 2010 - 2030 Table of Contents Part A – About the Cradle Coast Regional 5.1.1 Sea Transport Land Use Planning Framework 5.1.2 Air Transport 5.1.3 Road Transport 1.
    [Show full text]