DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2009/10 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Report 2009/10 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources COVER IMAGE: KINGSTON BYPASS A contract for the construction of the $41.5 million Kingston Bypass was signed in February and an official sod-turning ceremony was held later the same month. Once completed the 2.8 kilometre bypass will ease congestion in and around Kingston, providing motorists with a quicker, safer trip. The final design was the result of an extensive community consultation process. • Pictured at the sod-turning ceremony with their shovels at the ready are (from left) Franklin Federal MP Julie Collins, Deputy Premier Lara Giddings, Federal Infrastructure and Transport Minister Anthony Albanese, the then Tasmanian Infrastructure Minister Graeme Sturges and the Mayor of Kingborough, Dr Graham Bury. October 2010 Hon Lara Giddings, MP Minister for Infrastructure Parliament House HOBART 7000 Hon Bryan Green, MP Minister for Energy and Resources Minister for Racing Parliament House HOBART 7000 Hon Nick McKim, MP Minister for Sustainable Transport and Alternative Energy Parliament House HOBART 7000 Dear Ministers In accordance with Section 36 of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I am pleased to submit for your information and presentation to Parliament, the Annual Report of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources for the year ended 30 June 2010. The Financial Statements and the certificate of the Auditor-General are included. The Annual Report of the Director of Energy Planning, required under Section 13 of the Energy Coordination and Planning Act 1995 and the Report and Financial Statements of the Abt Railway Ministerial Corporation, required under Section 31 of the Abt Railway Development Act 1999, are also included. Yours sincerely Norm McIlfatrick SECRETARY Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Annual Report 2009/10 Page 1 CONTENTS The Organisation 3 Secretary’s Overview 5 Output Group 1 – Infrastructure 8 1.1 Infrastructure Strategy 9 1.2 Rail Safety 11 1.3 Road Safety 12 1.4 Registration and Licensing 22 1.5 Vehicle Operations 24 1.6 Traffic Management and Engineering Services 24 1.7 Passenger Transport 27 Capital Investment Program 29 Output Group 2 - Energy Advisory and Regulatory Services 36 Report of the Director of Energy Planning 42 Output Group 3 – Mineral Resources Management and Administration 46 Output Group 4 - Support for the Minister for Energy and Resources 52 Output Group 5 – Racing Policy and Regulation 54 Output Group 6 – Transport Subsidies and Concessions 62 Administered Payments 63 The Abt Railway Ministerial Corporation (West Coast Wilderness Railway) 64 Corporate Services 65 Freedom of Information Statistics 72 Public Interest Disclosures Act 2002 74 Major Contracts and Consultancies 75 Tasmania Together Responsibilities 78 Legislation Administered by the Department 84 Documents Published 87 Statutory and Non-Statutory Bodies 88 How to Contact Us Inside Back Cover Page 2 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Annual Report 2009/10 DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY AND RESOURCES The Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources • facilitate mineral exploration and mining resource tenement provides infrastructure and related services for the social management of Tasmanian land and offshore waters; and and economic development of Tasmania. • maintain probity and integrity in the racing industry. The Department reports to the Minister for Infrastructure, Outputs of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Hon Lara Giddings MP; the Minister for Energy and Resources are provided under the following Output Groups: Resources and the Minister for Racing, Hon Bryan Green MP; and the Minister for Sustainable Transport and • Output Group 1 – Infrastructure; Alternative Energy, Hon Nick McKim MP. • Output Group 2 – Energy Advisory and Regulatory Services; By providing a strategic approach to the provision of both • Output Group 3 – Mineral Resources Management and physical infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, the Administration; Department aims to: • Output Group 4 – Support for the Minister for Energy • facilitate a safe and efficient transport system that and Resources; enhances economic development; • Output Group 5 – Racing Policy and Regulation; and • promote reliable, efficient, safe and sustainable energy • Output Group 6 – Transport Subsidies and Concessions systems; The Department also administers a Grants and Subsidies • facilitate forest policy for Tasmania’s sustainable program, manages an infrastructure Capital Investment program, forestry practices and forest industries; and exercises functions and powers under the Abt Railway Development Act 1999. Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Annual Report 2009/10 Page 3 Page 4Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Annual Report 2009/10 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (As at 30 June 2010) Secretary Norm McIlfatrick Deputy Secretary Executive Director Deputy Secretary Infrastructure/Transport International Marketing Energy & Resources Commissioner and Infrastructure Projects Bob Rutherford David Peters Kim Creak Roads & Traffic Infrastructure Strategy Land Transport Safety Forest Policy Racing Services Energy Planning & Mineral Resources Private Forests Forest Practices Corporate Services General Manager Division General Manager Director Tasmania Conservation Director Tasmania Director Tasmania* Authority* General Manager Peter Todd General Manager Penny Nicholls Andrew Blakesley General Manager Tony Van De Vusse Michal Leonard & Chief Executive Officer Chief Forest Practices Amanda Russell David Spence Tony Murray State Chief Geologist Tom Fisk Officer Tony Brown Graham Wilkinson Operations Director Infrastructure Registration & Passenger Transport Energy Policy Resource Manager Phil Cantillon Planning Director Licensing Manager Services Manager Metallic Minerals Management Manager Sue Morrison Di Gee Richard Fowler Bernard Carlington & Geochemistry Stephen Long Manager Geoffrey Green Traffic and Infrastructure Infrastructure Policy Vehicle Operations Passenger Transport Energy Planning & Corporate Affairs Director Director Manager Policy Director Security Manager Manager Suzie Jacobson Simon Buxton Martin Blake John Bessell David Hope Tim Astley Industrial Minerals & Land Management Manager Carol Bacon State Infrastructure Road Safety Financial Services Planning System Operations Manager Manager Stephen Shirley Project Manager Grant Douglas Geosciemce Ian Hughes Information Branch Robert Richardson Human Resources Land Transport Safety Manager Policy Manager Janine Pearson Angela Conway Royalty, Finance & Administration Manager Matthew Fitzgerald Information Rail Safety Manager Management Manager Craig Hoey Heather Ring *Please note: Forest Practices Authority and Private Forests Tasmania are statutory authorities that receive support from DIER in relation to budget and human resource matters. Secretary’S OVERVIEW The Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Although TasRail faces challenges, I am confident (DIER) continues to play a leading role in the regulation, that with the funding commitments the Tasmanian and creation and maintenance of Tasmania’s transport Australian Governments have made to improve rail infrastructure and in the provision of expert services and infrastructure and rolling stock, they have very bright policy in the Energy, Resources and Racing sectors. prospects for the future. Following the State election of March 2010 a new Ministry was announced in April. We welcomed three new Our People Ministers - Lara Giddings (Infrastructure), Bryan Green Our second Pulse Check Survey in June, to find out (Energy and Resources and Racing) and Nick McKim what DIER staff think about leadership, planning and (Sustainable Transport and Alternative Energy). communication in DIER, was completed by a pleasing 57% One of the most significant milestones of the year was the of all DIER employees. successful completion of the purchase of the Tasmanian Overall we received a 64% positive rating across all rail business from Pacific National. From 1 December questions. This is an improvement of 6 per cent from the 2009, Tasmanian Railway Pty Ltd (TasRail) assumed 2008 survey. A positive result required a rating of 4 or 5 out responsibility for the management and maintenance of all of the 5 on the point rating scale. rail infrastructure and railway operations in the State. This handover represented the start of a new chapter for rail in While our focus from the last survey was to lift our Tasmania. performance in the areas of internal communication A huge amount of work was done within DIER, including and leadership development, I was pleased to see solid the passage of a significant package of legislation, to movement across the board. This was achieved in a ensure that arrangements were in place for Tasmanian very busy and challenging period for the Agency. This Railway to be operational on 1 December. Business gives me great confidence that we have a foundation for continuity and a seamless transition for staff and further improvements to life at DIER – and to make this customers were the key priorities throughout this process. organisation an even better place to work in. Special mention should be made of Martin Blake, Luke The survey asked an additional question about what Gregory, George Pitt and
Recommended publications
  • Government Services Volume 2

    Government Services Volume 2

    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Budget Paper No 2 Government Services Volume 2 Presented by the Honourable Michael Aird MLC, Treasurer, for the information of Honourable Members, on the occasion of the Budget, 2009-10 Useful 2009-10 Budget and Government Web sites www.budget.tas.gov.au Contains the Budget Papers. www.treasury.tas.gov.au Provides other Budget and financial publications. www.media.tas.gov.au Contains the Government's Budget related media releases. www.tas.gov.au Provides links to the Web sites of a wide range of Tasmanian public and private sector organisations. www.service.tas.gov.au Provides a comprehensive entry point to Government services in Tasmania. www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au Provides detailed information on Tasmania Together, including the current status of this important initiative. CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1 Introduction PART 1: DEPARTMENTS 2 Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts 3 Department of Education 4 Finance-General 5 Department of Health and Human Services 6 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources 7 Department of Justice VOLUME 2 PART 1: DEPARTMENTS (CONTINUED) 8 Ministerial and Parliamentary Support 9 Department of Police and Emergency Management 10 Department of Premier and Cabinet 11 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 12 Department of Treasury and Finance PART 2: AGENCIES 13 House of Assembly 14 Legislative Council 15 Legislature-General 16 Office of the Governor 17 Office of the Ombudsman i 18 Tasmanian Audit Office PART 3: STATUTORY AUTHORITIES 19 Inland
  • Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks

    Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks

    1979/3. Groundwater, mineral resources and land stability in the Tasman Peninsula. W.C. Cromer, R.C. Donaldson P. C. Stevenson V.N. Threader Abstract Groundwater prospects, mineral deposits and land stability are discussed to provide information for a planning study of the Tasman Peninsula. INTRODUCTION This report was written at the request of the Commissioner for Town and Country Planning, and is the result of a map compilation, a search of records and field work during the period 20 - 24 November 1978. 1. Groundwater from fractured rocks P.C. Stevenson The amoun~ of water that may be obtained from the hard rocks of the Peninsula by boreholes is controlled by the composition and conditions of weathering and fracture. The amount of direct information is limited because only eight bore­ holes have been recorded, all at Koonya, Premaydena or Nubeena, but exper­ ience in other parts of the State enable some general comments to be made. The geology of the Peninsula is shown in Figure 1. The Jurassic dolerite, which forms many of the most rugged and remote parts of the Peninsula, has not been drilled for water but is regarded throughout Tasmania as an extremely poor prospect; very hard to drill, almost always dry and where water exists it is hard and saline. It cannot be recommended. The Permian mudstone and fine-grained sandstone have not been drilled in the Peninsula, but elsewhere are reliable producers of good quality groundwater. yields of 20 to 150 l/min and qualities of 200 - 600 mg/l of total dissolved solids are usual.
  • Australian Electoral Systems

    Australian Electoral Systems

    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 21 August 2007, no. 5, 2007–08, ISSN 1834-9854 Australian electoral systems Scott Bennett and Rob Lundie Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary The Australian electorate has experienced three types of voting system—First Past the Post, Preferential Voting and Proportional Representation (Single Transferable Vote). First Past the Post was used for the first Australian parliamentary elections held in 1843 for the New South Wales Legislative Council and for most colonial elections during the second half of the nineteenth century. Since then there have been alterations to the various electoral systems in use around the country. These alterations have been motivated by three factors: a desire to find the ‘perfect’ system, to gain political advantage, or by the need to deal with faulty electoral system arrangements. Today, two variants of Preferential Voting and two variants of Proportional Representation are used for all Australian parliamentary elections. This paper has two primary concerns: firstly, explaining in detail the way each operates, the nature of the ballot paper and how the votes are counted; and secondly, the political consequences of the use of each system. Appendix 1 gives examples of other Australian models used over the years and Appendix 2 lists those currently in use in Commonwealth elections as well as in the states and territories. y Under ‘Full’ Preferential Voting each candidate must be given a preference by the voter. This system favours the major parties; can sometimes award an election to the party that wins fewer votes than its major opponent; usually awards the party with the largest number of votes a disproportionate number of seats; and occasionally gives benefits to the parties that manufacture a ‘three-cornered contest’ in a particular seat.
  • Smart Decisions. Strong Partnerships. Stronger Communities

    Smart Decisions. Strong Partnerships. Stronger Communities

    2025 smart decisions. strong partnerships. stronger communities. With Funding support from Australian Government through Primary Health 2 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 contents the plan 03 Our Future 05 Our Place Our Lifestyle 11 Our Community Plan 20 Future Directions 23 What We Said our plan for action Our People Our Community 29 Our Economy 32 Our Infrastructure 34 Our Environment 36 Our Partnerships Our Leadership 37 3 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 from the Mayor & General Manager our future t is with great pride that we present the We look forward to continuing these West Coast Community Plan 2025, a valued partnerships and connections, as the vision for the West Coast which will guide community moves forward with a whole-of- the Region over the next 10 years and community response to the vision provided Ibeyond. for the West Coast. West Coast’s Community Plan provides an The community embraced the opportunity opportunity to strategically plan a future that to be part of a vision for the Region, and the community, Council, government, non- that is reflected through the engagement government organisations, businesses and process and reflected in the Plan. West stakeholders can work towards together. Coast Council would like to sincerely thank the community for their enthusiasm The Community Plan has been developed and responsiveness to the West Coast by the West Coast community, for the Community Plan engagement process. community. More than 2,000 people were The visions, suggestions, and comments involved in some way in the development provided by the community have resulted of this plan, and it is the culmination of the in the development of the first West Coast ideas, vision, and concerns of our community.
  • Tasman Peninsula

    Tasman Peninsula

    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
  • AUDITOR-GENERAL SPECIAL REPORT No. 83 Communications

    AUDITOR-GENERAL SPECIAL REPORT No. 83 Communications

    2009 No. 34 2009 PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA AUDITOR-GENERAL SPECIAL REPORT No. 83 Communications by Government and The Tasmanian Brand project October 2009 Presented to both Houses of Parliament in accordance with the provisions of Audit Act 2008 Printed by: Print Applied Technology, Hobart © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania October 2009 Auditor-General’s reports are available from the Tasmanian Audit Office, HOBART, although in limited supply. This report and the recent titles shown at the back of this report can be accessed via the Office’s home page. For further information please contact: Tasmanian Audit Office GPO Box 851 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Phone: (03) 6226 0100, Fax (03) 6226 0199 Email: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.audit.tas.gov.au This report is printed on recycled paper. ISBN 978-0-9806227-1-8 29 October 2009 President Legislative Council HOBART Speaker House of Assembly HOBART Dear Madam President Dear Mr Speaker SPECIAL REPORT NO. 83 Communication by Government and The Tasmanian Brand project These reports, aimed at drawing conclusions on whether government expenditure on communications had been used for party political purposes and assessing whether the Tasmanian Brand project complied with Treasurer’s Instructions and whether maximum benefits from expenditure incurred to date were achieved, were prepared consequent to examinations conducted under section 23 of the Audit Act 2008. Yours sincerely H M Blake AUDITOR-GENERAL Contents Foreword ........................................................................................ i List of acronyms and abbreviations ............................................... ii Independent auditor’s conclusions ................................................ 2 Communications by Government ................................................................................ 2 The Tasmanian Brand project ..................................................................................... 4 Executive summary — Communications by Government ...............
  • THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 National Trust Heritage Festival 2013 Community Milestones

    THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 National Trust Heritage Festival 2013 Community Milestones

    the NatioNal trust presents THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 national trust heritage Festival 2013 COMMUNITY MILESTONES message From the miNister message From tourism tasmaNia the month-long tasmanian heritage Festival is here again. a full program provides tasmanians and visitors with an opportunity to the tasmanian heritage Festival, throughout may 2013, is sure to be another successful event for thet asmanian Branch of the National participate and to learn more about our fantastic heritage. trust, showcasing a rich tapestry of heritage experiences all around the island. The Tasmanian Heritage Festival has been running for Thanks must go to the National Trust for sustaining the momentum, rising It is important to ‘shine the spotlight’ on heritage and cultural experiences, For visitors, the many different aspects of Tasmania’s heritage provide the over 25 years. Our festival was the first heritage festival to the challenge, and providing us with another full program. Organising a not only for our local communities but also for visitors to Tasmania. stories, settings and memories they will take back, building an appreciation in Australia, with other states and territories following festival of this size is no small task. of Tasmania’s special qualities and place in history. Tasmania’s lead. The month of May is an opportunity to experience and celebrate many Thanks must also go to the wonderful volunteers and all those in the aspects of Tasmania’s heritage. Contemporary life and visitor experiences As a newcomer to the State I’ve quickly gained an appreciation of Tasmania’s The Heritage Festival is coordinated by the National heritage sector who share their piece of Tasmania’s historic heritage with of Tasmania are very much shaped by the island’s many-layered history.
  • EPBC Act Referral

    EPBC Act Referral

    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2021/8909 - South Marionoak Tailings Storage Facility, Rosebery, Tasmania Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The proposed action is the construction and operation of a new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at South Marionoak (SMO) in proximity to Rosebery, Tasmania within the West Coast municipality (South Marionoak TSF). The South Marionoak TSF will form part of the MMG Rosebery mine operations and will allow for piping and disposal of tailings resulting from the processing plant. The proposed South Marionoak TSF will provide long term essential tailings storage for the Rosebery Mine. Rosebery Mine has operated continuously since 1936 as an underground polymetallic base metal mine with a capacity to produce up to 1,100,000 tonnes of ore per year. Rosebery produces zinc, copper and lead concentrates, as well as gold ore. The mine has used the Bobadil TSF, situated approximately 2.5 km north of the mine, and 2/5 Dam TSF situated approximately 1 km south of the mine. The TSFs are expected to reach capacity within the next few years, and a new TSF will be required to support the mine’s ongoing operation. The South Marionoak TSF has been designed as an off-stream facility with storage volume of approximately 25 Mm3 and an anticipated lifespan of around 42 years (based on current tailings production rates).
  • Channel Highway, Kingston Bypass

    Channel Highway, Kingston Bypass

    2009 (No. 30) 2009 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Channel Highway, Kingston Bypass ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Green Mrs Napier TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVES....................................................................................................................................2 PROJECT FEATURES ..................................................................................................................3 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION............................................................................................4 THE EXISTING SITUATION .....................................................................................................5 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION........................................................................................................8 THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................9 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT...................................................................................................
  • Conservation of Natural Wilderness Values in the Port Davey Marine and Estuarine Protected Area, South-Western Tasmania

    Conservation of Natural Wilderness Values in the Port Davey Marine and Estuarine Protected Area, South-Western Tasmania

    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 20: 297–311 (2010) Published online 3 December 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1079 Conservation of natural wilderness values in the Port Davey marine and estuarine protected area, south-western Tasmania GRAHAM J. EDGARa,b,Ã, PETER R. LASTc, NEVILLE S. BARRETTb, KAREN GOWLETT-HOLMESc, MICHAEL DRIESSENd and PETER MOONEYe aAquenal Pty Ltd, GPO Box 828, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 bTasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-49, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 cCSIRO Divison of Marine and Atmospheric Research, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 dDepartment of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 eParks and Wildlife Service, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 ABSTRACT 1. Port Davey and associated Bathurst Harbour in south-western Tasmania represent one of the world’s most anomalous estuarine systems owing to an unusual combination of environmental factors. These include: (i) large uninhabited catchment protected as a National Park; (ii) ria geomorphology but with fjord characteristics that include a shallow entrance and deep 12-km long channel connecting an almost land-locked harbour to the sea; (iii) high rainfall and riverine input that generate strongly-stratified estuarine conditions, with a low-salinity surface layer and marine bottom water; (iv) a deeply tannin-stained surface layer that blocks light penetration to
  • Ministerial Report Report Ministerial SCHOOL VIABILITY

    Ministerial Report Report Ministerial SCHOOL VIABILITY

    Ministerial Report Report Ministerial SCHOOL VIABILITY School Viability Reference Group Report to the Minister for Education and Skills 31 January 2012 1 Note from the Chair The Hon Nick McKim MP Minister for Education and Skills Ministerial Parliament House HOBART 7000 Report School Viability Reference Dear Nick Group Report Thank you for the opportunity to chair the School Viability Reference Group tasked with providing a report and recommendations on maintaining a viable Government School system in Tasmania. On behalf 31 January 2012 of our Group, I am pleased to provide you with our final report. Ministerial Report Ministerial At the outset our Group agreed it was vital we begin by meeting with representatives of all Tasmanian Government schools and Local Governments to seek their views. In addition we invited written responses from interested groups and individuals. This proved to be an invaluable process and was the origin for much of our thinking which has led to the recommendations outlined in this report. Without question schools are considered an important part of a community, particularly in rural and remote regions. In many cases we heard strong and credible economic and social arguments supporting the continuation of local schools. Our Group is generally supportive of these views but believes any additional cost to maintain a school for these reasons should not be the responsibility of the Education Department but should be funded from other sources following a comprehensive review of each case. Our recommendations have been based primarily on ensuring the best possible education outcomes for all of Tasmania’s children and young people attending Government schools.
  • 2018-2019 State Budget

    2018-2019 State Budget

    Hon Peter Gutwein MP Treasurer 15 June 2018 Budget Context Deliver a stronger Action on the cost economy and more of living jobs Invest in health, SIX KEY Keep Tasmanians education and safe THEMES Tasmanians in need Protect the Build Tasmania’s Tasmanian way of infrastructure for life the 21st century Budget Highlights Includes all election commitments - in full and on time Record boost to Record $2.6 billion health – infrastructure program $757 million over six years Education – $125 million for Stage 2 of the $324 million over six Affordable Housing years Strategy Strong and growing Modest Surpluses economy every year Strong Economy 114 Final Demand 115 Retail Trade 110 Tasmania 110 Australia data 106 Australia 105 trend 102 100 Tasmania Index: June 2014 =100 June Index: (2015-16 prices) 98 95 Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 55 Business Expectations 130 International Exports 50 Tasmania 120 45 Tasmania 40 110 Australia Australia 35 100 30 90 Index, quarter4 average Index, 25 Index: June 2014 =100 June Index: 20 12 average, month moving 80 Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 Strong Economy Employment Net Interstate Migration 249 ) ) 12 500 1000 Tasmania '000 ('000 500 ( 244 12 000 0 Tas 239 Aus -500 Australia 11 500 -1000 234 to total year Number, Employed, Employed, -1500 229 11 000 Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 9 Unemployment Rate 130 Business Investment 120 Tasmania 8 Tasmania 110 16 prices) - data 7 100 6 90 Australia data(2015 %, %, trend 80 Australia 2014