LATE HALLSTATT POTTERY from NORTH-EASTERN SERBIA (6Th to 4Th Century BC)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ALEKSANDAR KAPURAN Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade LATE HALLSTATT POTTERY FROM NORTH-EASTERN SERBIA (6th to 4th century BC) UDC: 903.23(497.11)"–05/–03" e-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.2298/STA1363023K Received: Decembar 28, 2012 Original research article Accepted: April 23, 2013 Abstract. – By looking at prehistoric collections and unpublished material from the museums in north-eastern Serbia, as well as by surveying and excavating, new information was gained which fulfills the image of material and spiritual culture of prehistoric communities from the end of the Early Iron Age. Usually, for a closer chronological determination, metal jewellery and weapons were considered. Pottery finds were published only occasionally, usually due to contexts which were not clear enough, or due to chronological insensitivity (unless they were grave goods), but also due to stylistic and typological differences not clearly distin- guished between the “Basarabi” culture and the culture of “channelled pottery”. This paper aims to define features of pottery pro- duction from different sites, more precisely, those found in the territory between the Iron Gates, Klju~ and the Timok valley. Key words. – Late Iron Age, pottery typology, eastern Serbia, Central Balkans. he basic problem faced by Serbian archaeolo- fact that huge amounts of finds from numerous exca- gists during the defining of the material culture vations from the end of the 1960’s to the 1980’s, on T of the Late Hallstatt or pre-La Téne period was sites which are now under the artificial lakes of the \er- the small number of sites with a clearly defined stratig- dap I and II dams, were published only as short reports. raphy within which this period would be easily recog- On the other hand, a reconstruction of the cultural nisable. These would be the hill-settlements (tels) of stratigraphy of the Zlot cave was made difficult due to Gradina na Bosutu and Feudvar, both situated on the the lack of field documentation from the excavation southern border of the Pannonian plain.1 Such a situa- tion led to the fact that, for example, the Srem group was presented in literature exclusively as luxurious jewellery finds, coming mostly from graves, or as iso- 1 Medovi} i Medovi} 2010; Roeder 1991, 119–136. lated or hoard finds,2 (almost all of them without any 2 Brun{mid 1902, 1–19; Gara{anin 1973, 512; Vasi} 1977, clear archaeological context). The Zlot group in east- 28–29; Vasi} 1987a, 555–558; Popovi} 1981, 37–41; Medovi} 2007, 67–72; Medovi} 1990, 31; Medovi} and Medovi} 2010; Medovi} ern Serbia is also, in most cases, defined as finds of and Hänsel 2006, 489–512. metal jewellery and weapons, most of which were dis- 3 Vasi} 1977, 19–20; Vasi} 1987b, 660–665; Vukmanovi} covered in the Zlot cave.3 A much bigger problem is the 1990, 49; Jevti} 2004. * This text is the result of the project: Archaeology of Serbia: cultural identity, integration factors, technological processes and the role of the Central Balkans in the development of European prehistory (No. OI177020) financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. 23 Aleksandar KAPURAN, Late Hallstatt pottery from north-eastern Serbia (6th to 4th century BC) (23–51) STARINAR LXIII/2013 1) Gradina na Bosutu; 2) @idovar; 3) Feudvar; 4) Vinkovci; 5) Doroslovo; 6) [abac; 7) Pe}ine; 8) Ljuljaci; 9) Sarina me|a; 10) Crvena livada; 11) Atenica; 12) Pilatovi}i; 13) Tre{njevica; 14) Brvenik; 15) Novi Pazar; 16) Stoiljska gradina; 17) Velika gradina; 18) Vrti{te; 19) Hisar u Leskovcu; 20) Meani{te; 21) Karaga~; 22) Bela}evac; 23) Crkvi{te i Bunji{te; 24) Osaonica; 25) Gradac; 26) Hisar u Suvoj reci; 27) Fu{e; 28) Novopazarska Banja Map 1. Hallstatt settlements and necropoles on Central Balkan teritory Karta 1. Naseqa i nekropole poznog Hal{tata na teritoriji centralnog Balkana performed almost half a century ago. Finally, the biggest (Map 2). The first metal and pottery finds from Late misunderstandings are caused by ethno-cultural divi- Hallstatt were obtained during protective excavations sions within national archaeology in the Balkans, of the Zlot cave, while the next ones came from the transferred into scientific interpretations of the mate- Iron Gates region. During the first rescue research of rial evidence, originating from the interpretations of the Iron Gates, three settlements were discovered with ancient sources. pottery and metal finds from this period: Padina, Regarding the territory, the finding places of Late Hajdu~ka vodenica6 and Pecka Bara.7 Systematic Hallstatt in Serbia can be divided into five geographic excavation on Kuznjica followed, and later, during areas: southern Pannonia, the Morava valley, eastern archaeological research of \erdap II, Ru`enjka was Serbia, western Serbia, Kosovo and southern Serbia (the discovered. southern Morava valley). Most attention was paid to the New data about the finds of Late Hallstatt material sites at the edge of southern Pannonia, the hill-settle- and spiritual culture in north-eastern Serbia were ob- ments (tels) Gradina na Bosutu (Bosut IVc) and Feudvar tained after the research of the sites of Mihailov ponor by Mo{orin4, since here the horizon was clearly defin- at Miro~,8 Banjica in Rgo{te near Knja`evac9 and Mo- able in the existing stratigraphy. These sites should also kranjske stene near Negotin.10 Other sites near the be joined by @idovar, where the recent stratigraphic Zlotska (or Lazareva) cave include Trvaj and Seli{te in situation also showed the presence of the horizon with pottery finds of the “channelled horizon” (Map 1).5 4 Medovi} and Hänsel 1988–1989, 22. 5 NORTHEASTERN SERBIA Lju{tina 2010, 59–78. 6 Jovanovi} 1974, Fig. 10. 7 Mini} i Ercegovi}-Pavlovi} 1982–1983. Our overview of the Late Hallstatt pottery produc- 8 Jevti}, Pekovi} 2007, 191–220. tion in north-eastern Serbia will begin with the sys- 9 Stoji}, Iliji} 2011, 92–103. tematically excavated sites and only later will finds be 10 Popovi} and Kapuran 2011, 297–304; Bulatovi}, Kapuran considered which were unearthed during field surveys i Jawi} 2012. 24 Aleksandar KAPURAN, Late Hallstatt pottery from north-eastern Serbia (6th to 4th century BC) (23–51) STARINAR LXIII/2013 Map 2. Late Halstat settlements in the North Eastern Serbia Karta 2. Naseqa poznog hal{tata u severoisto~noj Srbiji Zlot, Kuznjica near Rudna glava, Ru`enjka by Mihailo- sibility to include the less known forms in the typology, vac, Stari sala{, Mokranjske stene – the quarry and Mo- for which one could say that they were rare, or at least kranjske stene, the rock shelter in the vicinity of Nego- not dominant, among pottery forms from the Basarabi tin, Zlatkov rt in Bela reka and Bele stene in Rgotina. cultural horizons. Since very little is known about the stratigraphic – The Zlot (Lazareva) cave12, near Bor, is situated typological features of the Late Hallstatt pottery pro- on the eastern edge of the Ku~ajske mountains and re- duction outside southern Pannonia, it would be best to presents the best and almost fully excavated site at the focus on forms identical to those from Bosut, from the territory of Serbia. This multi-layer site came into being Zlot cave and from the Ferigile necropolis in Oltenia.11 during the early Eneolithic (Bubanj–Salcuta), existing Common elements which repeat on finds from several during late Eneolithic (Cotofeni–Kostolac), Middle sites possess characteristics of a local production, which Bronze Age, the transition from the Bronze into the Iron creates certain difficulties when trying to separate them Age (the Gava horizon) and Early, Middle and Late from finds which certainly belong to the Basarabi hori- Hallstatt. The Late Hallstatt horizon is stratigraphically zon, as happened in the Zlot cave. This is why we shall form our typology on stratigraphically homogenous sites like Mihailov ponor, Kuznjica and Ru`enjka. In this case, the sites with a homogenous stratigraphy are 11 Vulpe 1967. the most convenient ones, precisely because of the pos- 12 Tasi} 1969. 25 Aleksandar KAPURAN, Late Hallstatt pottery from north-eastern Serbia (6th to 4th century BC) (23–51) STARINAR LXIII/2013 less clearly distinguishable from the earlier horizons, Zlot cave. It is situated across the Rudna Glava, in the although N. Tasi} mentions that it is more distinguish- [a{ka river valley, in the Iron Gates hinterland. Archa- able in the inside of the cave, in which remains of a eological research was conducted during the 1970’s wooden cottage were discovered.13 Late Hallstatt pot- with thirteen trenches. A homogenous, single-layered tery finds include beakers with an expanded rim and cultural stratigraphy was discovered.17 Bowls are semi- high ribbon-shaped handles, well burnished and deco- spherical (Pl. II/4,5), conical or conical with an expanded rated incisions and punctuations with incrustation (Pl. rim (Pl. I/1–3), pots are semi-spherical with applied I/13–16). Conical bowls with a contracted rim deco- crescent or tongue-shaped handles (Pl. II/15,16), cups rated with faceting (Pl. I/8–9), spool-shaped handles on have ribbon-shaped handles above the rim (Pl. II/6,11, the rim (Pl. I/2,7) and different types of false handles 12) while beakers are biconical and possess an expand- imitating the spool-shaped ones (Pl. I/9) or tongue- ed rim (Pl. II/7–10,19). Smaller cups are “S”-profiled shaped handles (Pl. I/3,4,5,8). Biconical bowls which (Pl. II/11,12). The decoration includes carved parallel are slightly “S”-profiled (Pl. Ia/20,22). Spherical lines (Pl. II/5), triangles (Pl. II/18) or finger-made beakers with a channelled stomach and a high handle rows of circles (Pl.