Birds of Oak Forests in the Kumaon Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh, India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birds of Oak Forests in the Kumaon Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh, India FORKTAIL 16 (2000): 131-146 Birds of oak forests in the Kumaon Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh, India AISHA SULTANA and JAMAL A. KHAN We surveyed 19 patches of oak forests in three districts of the Kumaon Himalaya to document the status of birds from April 1995 to July 1997. Totals of 203, 85 and 84 species of birds were recorded by using species richness counting, point counts and line transect methods respectively. Totals of 182, 81 and 162 bird species were recorded from Almora, Nainital and Pithoragarh districts respectively. These, together with records from other relevant published sources, have been combined to produce a checklist of 382 bird species for the Kumaon Himalaya. It is recommended that further surveys should be conducted in Almora and Nainital districts. INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA The oak forests in the Kumaon Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh The surveys were conducted in three districts i.e. have been studied in detail by plant ecologists (Saxena Almora, Nainital and Pithoragarh of the Kumaon and Singh 1982, Saxena et al. 1985, Singh and Singh Himalaya (28°43'55" and 30°30'12"N latitude and 1986). However, very little current information exists 78°44'30" and 80°45'E longitude). We covered 19 oak on major animal communities (e.g. avian, mammalian patches of different sizes during these surveys (Fig. 1) etc.) which inhabit oak forests in the Kumaon Himalaya. between an altitudinal range of 1,200 to 3,500 m (Table Therefore, we carried out extensive surveys in extant 1). The Kumaon Himalaya are mountainous and oak patches to document the status of birds from April divisible into subtropical (300 to 1,500 m), temperate 1995 to July 1997. (1,500 to 3,500 m) and alpine (>3,500 m) zones (Saxena Figure 1. Location of sites covered during surveys in the Kumaon Himalaya (for site names, see Table 1) 132 AISHA SULTANA & JAMAL A. KHAN Forktail 16 (2000) Table 1. Sites covered during bird surveys in the Kumaon from 07h00-08h30 in the morning and 16h00-17h30 Himalaya in the evening. Bird species were recorded within a radius of 20 m. This was followed by sampling of birds by line Site name Code Patch Altitudinal size range transect and species richness counting methods in the Naini Tal Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary. Six line transects, each 500 Kunjakharak 1 14.5 1900-2500 m in length and 500 m apart, were monitored from Vinayak 2 15.32 1900-2400 07h00-09h00 to census the birds. There were nine Mukteshwar 3 11.75 1500-2400 monitoring sessions of each transect. A total of 71 bird Gager 4 3.25 1700-2300 lists were compiled in Binsar using the species richness Maheshkhan 5 22 1900-2300 counting method. Each list consisted of only 20 Almora consecutive different bird species seen. No species was Jageshwer 6 21 1800-2300 included more than once on each list. This was followed Sitlakhet 7 11.25 1700-2200 by the sampling of the bird communities in five oak Pandavkholi 8 13.23 1800-2500 patches of the Askot Wildlife Sanctuary, using the species Ranikhet 9 3 1880-2100 richness counting method, and a total of 54 bird lists Sundardunga 10 25.75 2500-3500 Pindari 11 21.5 2500-3500 were compiled. Lahur 12 49.5 2100-3000 During surveys in the pre-monsoon season of 1997, Binsar 13 11.25 1600-2500 birds were sampled by monitoring of 121 points and by Pithoragarh compiling 110 lists in different localities of the Kumaon Dhaphiadhura 14 34.36 1200-2500 Himalaya. The points were established randomly at each Majhtham 15 25 1300-3200 site and monitored for 20 minutes only as more than Duku 16 52 1290-2700 one point was monitored per day. Birds were counted Sobala 17 28.12 1900-3500 within a fixed radius of 20 m. The points were separated Munsiyari 18 30.5 2300-3000 by a minimum distance of at least 100 m. At each point, Mechh 19 23.25 1800-2200 data were collected on the following parameters: 1. Bird species et al. 1985). The vegetation in the Kumaon Himalaya is 2. Group size, sex (if identifiable) predominantly forest, and mostly belongs to moist 3. Radial distance and vertical distance temperate type (Champion and Seth 1968). There are 4. Activity five main forest types found in the whole of the Kumaon 5. Tree species Himalaya. These are sal forests (found up 1,200 m), pine forests (1,200-2,400 m), oak forests (1,300-3,200 6. Portion of the tree which was used by bird (upper m), mixed broadleaf forest (foothills to 3,300 m) and canopy, middle canopy, lower canopy, stem) and Betula utilis forest (3,200-3,500 m). The major tree ground species found in different sites included Quercus leucotrichophora, Q. lanata, Q. floribunda, Q. semecarpifolia, Data analysis Tsuga dumosa and Rhododendron arboreum, in association The total number of species for each site was calculated with Viburnum species, Myrica esculenta, Alnus by adding the number of different species cumulatively nepaulensis, Swida oblonga, Lyonia ovalifolia, Persea duthieii from either point counts or from different lists compiled and Lindera pulcherrima. The dominant shrub species in the area. All bird records from point counts, line were Myrsine africana, Arundinaria species, Berberis transect monitoring and species lists were pooled aristata, Rubus species, Daphnae species, Mahonia together to prepare a combined checklist for all surveyed nepaulensis and Pyracantha species. sites. All individual sightings of birds were pooled for each locality and bird species were ranked according to following abundance categories: METHODOLOGY 1 = rare (0-5 sightings) Sampling of birds 2 = common (6-25 sightings) 3 = abundant (26-50 sightings) The sampling of bird communities was initiated in 4 = very abundant (>50 sightings) Ranikhet region in the pre-monsoon season of 1995, followed by a survey and intensive study in the Binsar The species abundance scores for each site were Wildlife Sanctuary in Almora district in the pre- summed together to calculate mean rank abundance monsoon season of 1996. During the post-monsoon score for a species reflecting its overall abundance for season of 1996, surveys were carried out in the Askot the Kumaon Himalaya. The values of mean rank Wildlife Sanctuary in Pithoragarh district, and these abundance varied between 0 to 2.5. The total number were followed by surveys in the whole of the Kumaon of bird species were also classified according to their Himalaya during the pre-monsoon season of 1997. feeding guild and status following Ali and Ripley (1987), The species richness counting method (MacKinnon using the guild classification suggested by Karr (1971). and Phillipps 1993), point count method (Bibby et al. 1992) and line transect method (Emlen 1971) were used for sampling birds in oak patches. The study was initiated RESULTS in Ranikhet where 21 points were established in oak forest. The points were randomly established, with a Table 2 provides the number of bird species sampled minimum interval of 100-150 m and were monitored by different methods. A total of 203, 85 and 84 species Forktail 16 (2000) Birds of oak forests in the Kumaon Himalaya, Uttar Pradesh, India 133 Table 2. The number of species recorded at different sites in the Table 3 provides the classification of 197 bird species Kumaon Himalaya by different sampling methods according to their feeding guilds. The highest number (58.6%) of birds belonged to the insectivorous guild Sites SRCM PC LT and the lowest number (2.4%) to the nectarivorous guild NNSNNSNNS Nainital in the bird community in the Kumaon Himalaya. At Kunjakharak 4 39 8 22 district level the contribution of insectivorous birds Vinayak 3 35 8 12 varied slightly and was highest in Almora district Mukteshwar 4 42 8 21 (65.3%) and lowest in Pithoragarh district (59.4%). The Gager 3 39 4 13 birds were also classified according to their status in the Maheshkhan 5 49 8 29 Kumaon Himalayas (Table 4). The contribution of Total 19 78 36 35 resident birds was maximum (81.7%) in the community and it varied very little between the three districts. Almora Jageshwer 11 70 9 34 Sitlakhet 5 57 4 21 DISCUSSION Pandavkholi 3 44 4 15 Ranikhet - - 78 62 Sundardunga 18 108 4 7 The Kumaon Himalaya have been explored relatively Pindari 8 73 12 22 poorly as far as bird communities are concerned. There Lahur 6 53 8 22 are about 55 published accounts of birds from the Binsar 71 154 - - 54 84 Kumaon Himalayas. The most important of these were Total 122 185 119 75 54 84 those by Hudson (1930), who documented 124 bird species occurring on seven hills around Nainital between Pithoragarh 6,000 and 8,500 ft; Briggs (1931), who documented 83 Dhaphiadhura 34 111 8 28 bird species in Ranikhet forest, and Tak (1995), who Majhtham 4 49 9 29 documented 127, 94 and 82 species of birds from Duku 9 86 6 16 Nainital, Almora and Pithoragarh districts respectively. Sobala 31 117 12 20 The present study covered the same area in Ranikhet, Munsiyari 5 58 4 14 as well as the same period of the year as that of Briggs Mechh 3 41 4 9 Total 86 160 43 40 (1931), who also observed the birds in the Cantonment forests lying between Chobatia and Dhobi Ghat Nullah Overall total 254 203 198 85 54 84 in Ranikhet. We have compared the birds recorded in the present study with that of Briggs (1931) for Ranikhet SRCM = Species richness counting method, PC = Point count, forest only. Out of 83 birds recorded in 1931 and 114 LT = Line transect, N = Number of bird lists, points or transects, NS = Number of bird species birds in 1995, there are 68 common species, 15 species are exclusive to 1931 and 46 species were recorded only in 1995.
Recommended publications
  • Size-Selected Black Carbon Mass Distributions and Mixing State in Polluted and Clean Environments of Northern India Tomi Raatikainen1, David Brus1, Rakesh K
    Size-selected black carbon mass distributions and mixing state in polluted and clean environments of northern India Tomi Raatikainen1, David Brus1, Rakesh K. Hooda1,2, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen1, Eija Asmi1, Ved P. Sharma2, Antti Arola3, and Heikki Lihavainen1 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland 2The Energy and Resources Institute, Delhi, India 3Finnish Meteorological Institute, Kuopio, Finland Correspondence to: T. Raatikainen (tomi.raatikainen@fmi.fi) Abstract. We have measured black carbon properties by using a size-selected Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2). The measurements were conducted in northern India at two sites: Gual Pahari is located at the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP) and Mukteshwar at the Himalayan foothills. Northern India is known as one of the absorbing aerosol hot spots, but detailed in- formation about absorbing aerosol mixing state is still largely missing. Previous black carbon equivalent black carbon (eBC) 5 mass concentration measurements are available for this region and these are consistent with our observations showing that refractory black carbon (rBC) concentrations are about ten times higher in Gual Pahari than those at Mukteshwar. Also the number fraction of absorbing rBC-containing particles is higher in Gual Pahari, but individual absorbing particles including rBC-containing particles and their size distributions are fairly similar. These findings indicate that particles at both sites have similar local and regional emission sources, but aerosols are also transported from the main source regions (IGP) to the less 10 polluted regions (Himalayan foothills). Detailed examination of the absorbing rBC-containing particle properties revealed that they are most likely irregular particles such as fractal aggregates, but the exact structure remains unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring in South Texas
    SPRING IN SOUTH TEXAS MARCH 31–APRIL 9, 2019 Green Jay, Quinta Mazatlan, McAllen, Texas, April 5, 2019, Barry Zimmer LEADERS: BARRY ZIMMER & JACOB DRUCKER LIST COMPILED BY: BARRY ZIMMER VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM SPRING IN SOUTH TEXAS MARCH 31–APRIL 9, 2019 By Barry Zimmer Once again, our Spring in South Texas tour had it all—virtually every South Texas specialty, wintering Whooping Cranes, plentiful migrants (both passerine and non- passerine), and rarities on several fronts. Our tour began with a brief outing to Tule Lake in north Corpus Christi prior to our first dinner. Almost immediately, we were met with a dozen or so Scissor-tailed Flycatchers lining a fence en route—what a welcoming party! Roseate Spoonbill, Crested Caracara, a very cooperative Long-billed Thrasher, and a group of close Cave Swallows rounded out the highlights. Strong north winds and unsettled weather throughout that day led us to believe that we might be in for big things ahead. The following day was indeed eventful. Although we had no big fallout in terms of numbers of individuals, the variety was excellent. Scouring migrant traps, bays, estuaries, coastal dunes, and other habitats, we tallied an astounding 133 species for the day. A dozen species of warblers included a stunningly yellow male Prothonotary, a very rare Prairie that foraged literally at our feet, two Yellow-throateds at arm’s-length, four Hooded Warblers, and 15 Northern Parulas among others. Tired of fighting headwinds, these birds barely acknowledged our presence, allowing unsurpassed studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinaceae Lindl
    Pinaceae Lindl. Abies Mill. Cathaya Chun & Kuang Cedrus Trew Keteleeria Carrière Larix Mill. Nothotsuga H.H.Hu ex C.N.Page Picea Mill. Pinus L. Pseudolarix Gordon Pseudotsuga Carrière Tsuga (Endl.) Carrière VEGETATIVE KEY TO SPECIES IN CULTIVATION Jan De Langhe (29 July 2015 - 29 January 2016) Vegetative identification key. Introduction: This key is based on vegetative characteristics, and therefore also of use when cones are absent. - Use a 10× hand lens to evaluate stomata, bud, leaf scar, leaf apex and pubescence in general. - Look at the entire plant and especially the most healthy shoots. Young specimens, shade, coning, top crown and strong shoots give an atypical view. - Beware of hybridisation, especially with plants raised from seed other than wild origin. Taxa treated in this key: see page 5. Names referred to synonymy: see page 5. Misapplied names: see page 5. References: - JDL herbarium - living specimens, in various arboreta, botanic gardens and collections - literature: Bean, W.J. & Clarke, D.L. - (1981-1988) - Pinaceae in Bean's Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles - and online edition Debreczy, Z., Racz, I. - (2011) - Pinaceae in Conifers around the world - 2 VOL., 1089p. Eckenwalder, J.E. - (2009) - Pinaceae in Conifers of the world, 719p. Farjon, A - (1990) - Pinaceae, 330p. Farjon, A - (2010) - Pinaceae in A Handbook of The World's Conifers - 2 VOL., 1111p. Fu, L., Li, N., Elias, T.S., Mill, R.R. - (1999) - Pinaceae in Flora of China, VOL.4, p.11-59 - and online edition Grimshaw, J. & Bayton, R. - (2009) - Pinaceae in New Trees, 976p. Havill, N.P., Campbell, C., Vining, T.F., Lepage, B., Bayer,R.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnoveterinary Plants of Uttaranchal — a Review
    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 6(3), July 2007, pp. 444-458 Ethnoveterinary plants of Uttaranchal — A review PC Pande1*, Lalit Tiwari1 & HC Pande2 1Department of Botany, Kumaon University, SSJ Campus, Almora 263 601, Uttaranchal 2Botanical Survey of India (NC), Dehradun, Uttaranchal E-mail: [email protected] Received 21 December 2004; revised 7 February 2007 The study reveals that the people of the Uttaranchal state use 364 plants species in ethnoveterinary practices. Bhotiyas, Boxas, Tharus, Jaunsaris and Rhajis are the tribal groups inhabiting in Uttaranchal. Analysis of data indicates that information on 163 plants is significant as it provides some new information of the ethnoveterinary uses. The study is expected to provide basic data for further studies aimed at conservation of traditional medicine and economic welfare of rural people at the study area. Keywords: Ethnoveterinary practices, Medicinal plants, Uttaranchal, Review IPC Int. Cl.8: A61K36/00, A61P1/00, A61P1/02, A61P1/04, A61P1/10, A61P1/16, A61P17/00, A61P19/00, A61P25/00, A61P27/00, A61P39/02 Uttaranchal state lies between 28°42′ to 31°28′N; medicinal knowledge of the state. Keeping this in 77°35′ to 81°05′E and comprise of 13 districts of the view, an attempt has been made to explore and Central Himalayas. The major part of this region is compile the exhaustive knowledge of plants used in mountainous. The region covers about 38,000 sq km veterinary practices. In all, 364 plant species were and comprises of 3 border districts, namely recorded from the Uttaranchal, which are used by the Pithoragarh, Chamoli and Uttarkashi; 7 inner districts: people for various veterinary diseases and disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • La”Kksf/Kr Vkns”K
    la”kksf/kr vkns”k Incident Response System (IRS) for District Disaster Management in District Pithoragarh vkink izcU/ku vf/kfu;e 2005 v/;k; IV dh /kkjk 28 dh mi/kkjk 01 ds vUrxZr o`ºr vkinkvksa ds nkSjku tuin fiFkkSjkx<+ esa vkink izcU/ku izkf/kdj.k ds vUrxZr iwoZ esa xfBr fuEuor Incident Response System (IRS) dks fuEu izdkj leLr vkinkvksa gsrq fØ;kfUor fd;k tkrk gSaA S.N. Position of IRS Nomination in IRS 1. Responsible Officer (RO) District Magistrate (DM) Pithoragarh 05964-225301,225441, 9410392121, 7579162221 1.1 Deputy Responsible Officer (DRO) ADM/CDO/ Officer Next to DM 2.0 COMMAND STAFF (CS) 2.1 Incident Commander (IC) Superintendent of Police (SP) Pithoragarh 05964-225539, 225023, 9411112082 2.2 Information & Media Officer (IMO) District Information Officer (DIO) Pithoragarh, 05964-225549, 9568171372, 9412908675 NIC Officer Pithoragarh 05964-224162, 228017, 9412952098 2.3 Liaison Officer (LO) District Disaster Management Officer (DDMO) 05964-226326,228050, 9412079945, 8476903864 SDM (Sadar) Pithoragarh 05964-225950, 9411112595 2.4 Safety Officer (SO) SO Police 05964-225238, 9411112888 SDO forest 9410156299 FSO Pithoragarh as per Specific Requirement 05964-225314, 9411305686 3.0 OPERATION SECTION (OS) 3.1 Operation Section Chief (OSC) SP Pithoragarh 9411112082 DSP Pithoragarh 9411111955 DFO Pithoragarh (For Forst Fire) 05964-225234, 225390, 9410503638 CMO Pithoragarh (For Epidemics) 05964-225142,225504, 9837972600, 7310801479 3.2.1 Staging Area Manager (SAM) CO Police Pithoragarh 05964-225539, 225410, 941111955 RI Police line
    [Show full text]
  • Dachigam National Park
    MANAGEMENT PLAN (2011 - 2016) DACHIGAM NATIONAL PARK RASHID Y. NAQASH WILDLIFE WARDEN CENTRAL AND LALIT KUMAR SHARMA RESEARCH SCHOLAR CONTENTS INTRODUCATION I-II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Part-I Page Chapter 1. Introduction to the area 1.1 Name, location, Construction and extent 1.1.1. Name and History 1.1.2. Location 1.1.3. Constitution 1.1.4. Extent 1.2 Approach and access 1.3 Statement of significance Chapter 2. Background information and attributes 2.1 Boundaries 2.1.1. Legal 2.1.2. Internal 2.2 Geology, Rock and Soil 2.3 Terrain 2.4 Climate 2.4.1. Rainfall pattern and distribution 2.4.2. Temperature a summary of year round pattern 2.4.3. Humidity 2.4.4. Drought 2.5 Water Sources 2.6 Range of wildlife, Status, Distribution and habitat 2.6.1. Vegetation 2.6.1.1. Biogeography classification 2.6.1.2. Forest types, cover and food for wild animals 2.6.2. Animals 2.6.2.1. Vertebrates, their status, distribution and habitat 2.6.2.2. Limiting factors 2.6.2.3. Important invertebrates, their status, distribution and habitat Chapter 3. History of management and present practices 3.1. General 3.2. Timber operation including firewood harvest 3.3. Non-wood forest procedure collection 3.4. Leases 3.5. Other programmes and activities 3.6. Forest protection 3.6.1. Legal status 3.6.2. Hunting 3.6.3. Illegal activities 3.6.4. Domestic livestock grazing 3.6.5. Wildfires 3.6.6. Insect attacks and pathological problems 3.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnamese Conifers and Some Problems of Their Sustainable Utilization Ke Loc Et Al
    Vietnamese conifers and some problems of their sustainable utilization Ke Loc et al. Vietnamese conifers and some problems of their sustainable utilization Phan Ke Loc 1, 2, Nguyen Tien Hiep 2, Nguyen Duc To Luu 3, Philip Ian Thomas 4, Aljos Farjon 5, L.V. Averyanov 6, J.C. Regalado, Jr. 7, Nguyen Sinh Khang 2, Georgina Magin 8, Paul Mathew 8, Sara Oldfield 9, Sheelagh O’Reilly 8, Thomas Osborn 10, Steven Swan 8 and To Van Thao 2 1 University of Natural Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi; 2 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources; 3 Vietnam Central Forest Seed Company; 4 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; 5 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 6 Komarov Botanical Institute; 7 Missouri Botanical Garden; 8 Fauna & Flora International; 9 Global Trees Campaign; 10 Independent Consultant Introduction Vietnam is now recognized as one of the top ten global conifer conservation ‘hotspots’, as defined by the Conifer Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). Vietnam’s conifer flora has approximately 34 species that are indigenous to the country, making up about 5% of conifers known worldwide. Although conifers represent only less than 0.3% of the total number of higher vascular plant species of Vietnam, they are of great ecological, cultural and economic importance. Most conifer wood is prized for its high value in house construction, furniture making, etc. The decline of conifer populations in Vietnam has caused serious concern among scientists. Threats to conifer species are substantial and varied, ranging from logging (both commercial and subsistence), land clearing for agriculture, and forest fire. Over the past twelve years (1995-2006), Vietnam Botanical Conservation Program (VBCP), a scientific cooperation between the Missouri Botanical Garden in Saint Louis and the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources in Hanoi, has conducted various studies on this important group of plants in order to gather baseline information necessary to make sound recommendations for their conservation and sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2008), 33(3): pp. 478–489 © Copyright 2008 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae) Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal ITS and Chloroplast DNA Sequence Data Nathan P. Havill1,6, Christopher S. Campbell2, Thomas F. Vining2,5, Ben LePage3, Randall J. Bayer4, and Michael J. Donoghue1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106 U.S.A 2School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469-5735 U.S.A. 3The Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 U.S.A. 4CSIRO – Division of Plant Industry, Center for Plant Biodiversity Research, GPO 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia; present address: Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennesee 38152 U.S.A. 5Present address: Delta Institute of Natural History, 219 Dead River Road, Bowdoin, Maine 04287 U.S.A. 6Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Matt Lavin Abstract—Hemlock, Tsuga (Pinaceae), has a disjunct distribution in North America and Asia. To examine the biogeographic history of Tsuga, phylogenetic relationships among multiple accessions of all nine species were inferred using chloroplast DNA sequences and multiple cloned sequences of the nuclear ribosomal ITS region. Analysis of chloroplast and ITS sequences resolve a clade that includes the two western North American species, T. heterophylla and T. mertensiana, and a clade of Asian species within which one of the eastern North American species, T. caroliniana, is nested. The other eastern North American species, T. canadensis, is sister to the Asian clade. Tsuga chinensis from Taiwan did not group with T.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Spots Chaukori Chaukori Is Imbued with the Breathtaking Beauty of Pithoragarh District
    Tourist Spots Chaukori Chaukori is imbued with the breathtaking beauty of Pithoragarh district. chaukori offers a magnificent view of the Panchchuli peaks and has few rivals for spectacular Himalayan sunrises and sunsets. Visitors to chaukori lesser-known part of Pithoragarh . Tourist in chaukori can enjoy nature at her pristine best. Forests of pine, oak and rhododendron are interspersed with cornfields and orchards. Chaukori holds the promise of an idyllic vacation, and a close communication with nature. Gangolihat The sacred site is famous for the Hatkalika Fair held on the ashtami of Chaitra month at the Kalika temple. Devotees visit the shrine during this time with drums and flags to pay homage to Goddess Kalika Berinag Is a small hilly town. A beautiful temple of Berinag (Nag Devta) is there. Earlier it was also famous for tea gardens. All major peaks of himaliyas can seen. The famous cave of Patal Bhuweshner is also nerby to berinag.. Pithorahgarh Once the bastion of the Chand rulers, Pithoragarh town is littered with temples and forts belonging to that era. The town is set in a valley popularly known as Soar and lies in the centre of four hills Chandak, Dhwaj, Kumdar and Thal Kedar, and stretches in the southern flank to Jhulaghat demarcated by the Kali river adjoining the barren peaks of Nepal Hills. Narayan Ashram The ashram was established by Narayan Swami in 1936, about 136 km north of Pithoragarh and 14 km from Tawaghat. This spiritual cum-socio educational centre is set at an altitude of 2734 metres amidst scenic surroundings. It has a school for local children's and imparts training to local youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Rules
    21282 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR United States and the Government of United States or U.S. territories as a Canada Amending the 1916 Convention result of recent taxonomic changes; Fish and Wildlife Service between the United Kingdom and the (8) Change the common (English) United States of America for the names of 43 species to conform to 50 CFR Part 10 Protection of Migratory Birds, Sen. accepted use; and (9) Change the scientific names of 135 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0047; Treaty Doc. 104–28 (December 14, FXMB 12320900000//201//FF09M29000] 1995); species to conform to accepted use. (2) Mexico: Convention between the The List of Migratory Birds (50 CFR RIN 1018–BC67 United States and Mexico for the 10.13) was last revised on November 1, Protection of Migratory Birds and Game 2013 (78 FR 65844). The amendments in General Provisions; Revised List of this rule were necessitated by nine Migratory Birds Mammals, February 7, 1936, 50 Stat. 1311 (T.S. No. 912), as amended by published supplements to the 7th (1998) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Protocol with Mexico amending edition of the American Ornithologists’ Interior. Convention for Protection of Migratory Union (AOU, now recognized as the American Ornithological Society (AOS)) ACTION: Final rule. Birds and Game Mammals, Sen. Treaty Doc. 105–26 (May 5, 1997); Check-list of North American Birds (AOU 2011, AOU 2012, AOU 2013, SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and (3) Japan: Convention between the AOU 2014, AOU 2015, AOU 2016, AOS Wildlife Service (Service), revise the Government of the United States of 2017, AOS 2018, and AOS 2019) and List of Migratory Birds protected by the America and the Government of Japan the 2017 publication of the Clements Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) by for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Checklist of Birds of the World both adding and removing species.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttarakhand Emergency Assistance Project (UEAP)
    Initial Environment Examination Project Number: 47229-001 July 2016 IND: Uttarakhand Emergency Assistance Project (UEAP) Package: Construction of FRP huts in disaster affected district of Kumaon (District Bageshwar) Uttarakhand Submitted by Project implementation Unit –UEAP, Tourism (Kumaon), Nainital This initial environment examination report has been submitted to ADB by Project implementation Unit – UEAP, Tourism (Kumaon), Nainital and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. This initial environment examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ADB Project Number: 3055-IND April 2016 IND: Uttarakhand Emergency Assistance Project Submitted by Project implementation Unit, UEAP, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam limited, Nainital 1 This report has been submitted to ADB by the Project implementation Unit, UEAP, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam, Nainital and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. Asian Development Bank 2 Initial Environmental Examination April 2016 INDIA: CONSTRUCTION OF FRP HUTS IN DISASTER AFFECTED DISTRICT OF KUMAON (DISTRICT BAGESHWAR) UTTARAKHAND Prepared by State Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, for the Asian Development Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]