The Safety of Small Workboats & Pilot Boats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Safety of Small Workboats & Pilot Boats THE SAFETY OF SMALL WORKBOATS & PILOT BOATS - A CODE OF PRACTICE READY FOR PUBLICATION VERSION R-9B; October 1997 THIS COPY PRINTED ON - 4 May 2001 The Marine Safety Agency Spring Place 105 Commercial Road Southampton SO15 1EG Telephone: 01703 329 100 Facsimile: 01703 329 161 THE SAFETY OF SMALL WORKBOATS & PILOT BOATS - A CODE OF PRACTICE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT, STABILITY, OPERATION, MANNING, EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF VESSELS OF UP TO 24 METRES LOAD LINE LENGTH WHICH ARE IN COMMERCIAL USE FOR THE CARRIAGE OF CARGO AND/OR NOT MORE THAN 12 PASSENGERS OR NEITHER CARGO NOR PASSENGERS; AND PILOT BOATS. The Marine Safety Agency Spring Place 105 Commercial Road Southampton SO15 1EG Telephone: 01703 329 100 Facsimile: 01703 329 161 CONTENTS Section ................................................................................................................Heading .......................................................................................................................Page 1 FOREWORD.................................................................................................. 1 2 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................. 5 3 APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION ............................................... 12 3.1 Application........................................................................................... 12 3.2 Areas of Operation............................................................................... 12 3.3 Certification......................................................................................... 12 3.4 Sport Diving, Sea Angling and Other Water Based Recreation Activities.............................................................................................. 12 3.5 Interpretation........................................................................................ 13 3.6 Updating of the Code........................................................................... 13 3.7 Vessels Operating in Protected Waters and/or a Restricted Service - Equivalent Safety Standards.................................................. 13 3.8 Equivalent Standards............................................................................ 14 4 CONSTRUCTION AND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH ........................... 15 4.1 General Requirements.......................................................................... 15 4.2 Structural Strength............................................................................... 15 4.2.1 General................................................................................................. 15 4.2.2 Construction materials.......................................................................... 15 4.2.3 New vessels.......................................................................................... 16 4.2.4 Existing vessels.................................................................................... 16 4.3 Decks................................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 Weather deck....................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Recesses............................................................................................... 17 4.4 Watertight Bulkheads........................................................................... 17 4.5 Inflatable Boats.................................................................................... 18 4.5.1 General................................................................................................. 18 4.5.2 Construction materials.......................................................................... 19 4.5.3 New inflatable boats............................................................................. 19 4.5.4 Existing inflatable boats ....................................................................... 20 5 WEATHERTIGHT INTEGRITY................................................................ 21 5.1 Hatchways and Hatches and other Openings ........................................ 21 5.1.1 General requirements ........................................................................... 21 5.1.2 Hatches which are open at sea.............................................................. 21 5.2 Doorways and Companionways ........................................................... 21 5.2.1 Doorways located above the weather deck........................................... 22 5.2.2 Companion hatch openings .................................................................. 22 5.3 Skylights.............................................................................................. 22 5.4 Portlights and Windows ....................................................................... 23 5.5 Ventilators and Exhausts...................................................................... 24 5.6 Air Pipes .............................................................................................. 24 5.7 Sea Inlets and Discharges..................................................................... 25 5.8 Materials for Valves and Associated Piping ......................................... 25 6 WATER FREEING ARRANGEMENTS .................................................... 26 7 MACHINERY................................................................................................ 27 7.1 General Requirements.......................................................................... 27 7.2 Diesel Engines ..................................................................................... 27 7.3 Petrol Engines .................................................................................... 27 7.3.1 New vessels.......................................................................................... 27 7.3.2 Existing vessels.................................................................................... 28 7.4 Installation........................................................................................... 29 7.5 Engine Starting..................................................................................... 30 7.6 Portable Plant ....................................................................................... 30 7.7 Stowage of Petrol................................................................................. 30 8 ELECTRICAL ARRANGEMENTS............................................................ 31 8.1 General................................................................................................. 31 8.2 Systems................................................................................................ 31 8.3 Batteries............................................................................................... 32 8.4 Cables.................................................................................................. 33 8.5 Lighting ............................................................................................... 33 8.6 Hazardous Spaces ................................................................................ 33 8.7 Reference Standards............................................................................. 34 9 STEERING GEAR, RUDDER AND PROPELLER SYSTEMS .............. 35 9.1 Steering Gear ....................................................................................... 35 9.2 Rudder System..................................................................................... 35 9.3 Propeller System.................................................................................. 35 10 BILGE PUMPING......................................................................................... 36 10.1 Vessels of 15 metres in Length and Over ............................................. 36 10.2 Vessels of Less than 15 metres in Length............................................. 36 10.3 Bilge Alarms ........................................................................................ 37 11 INTACT AND DAMAGE STABILITY ...................................................... 38 11.1 New Vessels......................................................................................... 38 11.1.1 General............................................................................................................. 38 11.1.2 Intact stability of new vessels of less than 15 metres in length and carrying cargo or a combination of passengers and cargo weighing more than 1000kg and new vessels of 15 metres in length and over..................................................................................... 38 11.1.3 Intact stability of new vessels of less than 15 metres in length which carry cargo or a combination of passengers and cargo weighing not more than 1000kg........................................................................... 40 11.1.4 Damage stability of new vessels of 15 metres in length and over or which are certificated to carry 15 or more persons or which are certificated to operate in area category 1 .............................................. 41 11.2 Existing Vessels ................................................................................... 42 11.2.1 General............................................................................................................. 42 11.2.2 Intact stability of existing vessels of less than 15 metres in length which carry cargo or a combination of passengers and cargo weighing
Recommended publications
  • Of the New Jersey Maritime Pi- Lot and Docking Pilot Commission
    156th Annual Report Of The New Jersey Maritime Pi- lot and Docking Pilot Commission Dear Governor and Members of the New Jersey Legislature, In 1789, the First Congress of the United States delegated to the states the authority to regulate pilotage of vessels operating on their respective navigable waters. In 1837, New Jersey enacted legislation establishing the Board of Commissioners of Pilotage of the State of New Jersey. Since its creation the Commission has had the responsibility of licensing and regulating maritime pilots who direct the navigation of ships as they enter and depart the Port of New Jersey and New York. This oversight has contributed to the excellent reputation the ports of New Jersey and New York has and its pilots enjoy throughout the maritime world. New legislation that went into effect on September 1, 2004 enables the Commission to further contribute to the safety and security of the port by requiring the Commission to license docking pilots. These pilots specialize in the docking and undocking of vessels in the port. To reflect the expansion of its jurisdiction the Commission has been renamed “The New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission.” In keeping with the needs of the times, the new legislation has a strong security component. All pilots licensed by the state will go through an on going security vetting. The Commission will issue badges and photo ID cards to all qualified pilots, which they must display when entering port facilities and boarding vessels. The legislation has also modernized and clarified the Commissions’ authority to issue regulations with respect to qualifications and training required for pilot licenses, pilot training (both initial and recurrent) accident investigation and drug and alcohol testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission
    The New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission "The sea is the same as it has been since before men ever went on it in boats, it’s the boats that have changed." - Ernest Hemingway 2011 Annual Report 163rd Edition Dear Governor and Members of the New Jersey Legislature, With a new year came new challenges for the New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission. Dredg- ing of the main channels has created situations in which aids to navigation have been relocated, channels are nar- rower and the pilots jobs have become more difficult. The Commission made amendments to its existing regula- tions to ensure that state licensed pilots have the proper training and expertise to concur these challenges. Pilots are now required to complete a requisite number of trips on the routes for which they are licensed to ensure they remain conversant with the constant changes of the channels. We are scheduled to begin a new slate of interviews for the Maritime Pilot Apprentice Training Program. This process requires the designated Commissioner to devote a minimum of ten, eight-hour days to the evaluation and interviewing process used to select qualified candidates. Our Occurrence Investigation Committee investigated a total of twenty-eight incidents this year. Major accidents require over 150 hours of a Commissioners time to gather information, review track, review and transcribe VDRs and prepare reports for the Commission to review. The movement of buoys, the dredging of the channels and unaccommodating weather conditions has resulted in three such incidents in 2011. The first female Full Branch Maritime Pilot was sworn in at the Commissions February 15, 2011 meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure of Ray Hunt Design/Gladding-Hearn Pilot Boats
    Ray Hunt Design has more than 40 years of 40 YEARS experience in the design of pilot boats and OF DEPENDABLE other commercial vessels. It has been our privilege to design commercial vessels for the toughest jobs in the marine industry. The rigor- PERFORMANCE IN THE ous conditions that our commercial vessels operate in have been crucial to the development of our hull technology. We have been asked to developed the TOUGHEST most dependable and seaworthy vessels in the world decade after decade. The result, an unmatched CONDITIONS pedigree of commercial vessels for fair and raugh seas. Our long standing relationships with ship builders have allowed us to learn the most efficient and practical way to provide the modern commercial mariner with everything he needs to do the job and get home safely. “What Ray Hunt Design offers to a customer is our experience. The confidence to know that the boat you’ve asked us to design is going to work the first time, right out of the box.” Winn Willard, President A HISTORY OF PERFORMANCE Pilot service has changed over the past 20 years, with deeper draft ships requiring longer runs from shore-side pilot stations. Faster ships and lessened turnaround time require higher boarding speeds, sometimes 10 knots or more. The Hunt deep-V hull is not only a proven rough weather performer, but also performs well when boarding, remaining stable when in con- tact with a ship, with no tendency to become stuck alongside. Over the years, the sophistication of interior accommoda- tions has also changed. Pilots now sit in state-of-the-art Stidd seats, fully adjustable for comfort and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Schooner ALABAMA (ALABAMIAN) HAER No
    Pilot Schooner ALABAMA (ALABAMIAN) HAER No. MA-64 Vineyard Haven Martha's Vineyard Dukes County Li A ^ ^ Massachusetts ' l PHOTOGRAPHS REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Pilot Schooner ALABAMA (ALABAMIAN) HAER No. MA-64 Rig/Type of Craft: 2-masted schooner; mechanically propelled, sail assisted Trade: pilot vessel Official No.: 226177 Principle Dimensions: Length (overall): 88.63' Gross tonnage: 70 Beam: 21.6* Net tonnage: 35 Depth: 9.7' Location: moored in harbor at Vineyard Haven Martha's Vineyard Dukes County Massachusetts Date of Construction: 1925 Designer: Thomas F. McManus Builder: Pensacola Shipbuilding Co., Pensacola, Florida Present Owner: Robert S. Douglas Box 429 Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts 02568 Present Use: historic vessel Significance: ALABAMA was designed by Thomas F. McManus, a noted fi: schooner and yacht designer from Boston, Massachusetts. She was built during the final throes of the age of commercial sailing vessels in the United States and is one of a handful of McManus vessels known to survive. Historian: W. M. P. Dunne, HAER, 1988. Schooner Alabama HAER No. MA-64 (Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue 3 The Colonial Period at Mobile 1702-1813 5 Antebellum Mobile Bar Pilotage 10 The Civil War 17 The Post-Civil War Era 20 The Twentieth Century 25 The Mobile Pilot Boat Alabama, Ex-Alabamian, 1925-1988 35 Bibliography 39 Appendix, Vessel Documentation History - Mobile Pilot Boats 18434966 45 Schooner Alabama HAER No. MA-64 (Page 3) PROLOGUE A map of the Americas, drawn by Martin Waldenseemuller in 1507 at the college of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission
    TheThe NewNew JerseyJersey MaritimeMaritime PilotPilot andand DockingDocking PilotPilot CommissionCommission 2016 Annual Report 170th Edition PagePage 12 2016 Annual Report A special thanks to the following pilots for their contribution to this report: Captain Karen Basciano Apprentice Eric Lavin Captain Louis Bettinelli Captain Andrew McGovern Appentice Scott Britton Captain Timothy Nilsen Captain Harold Cavagnaro Captain John Oldmixon Captain John DeCruz Captain Ronald Perry Captain Robert Ellis Apprentice Sal Rivas Captain Robert Flannery, III Captain Richard Schoenlank Captain Paul Klein Captain Nils Tribus Editor: Andre M. Stuckey Executive Director New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission 170th Edition TABLE OF CONTENTS Presidents Message …………………………………………….. Page 1 Overview of the Commission ….………………………………. Page 3 Relationship with the Board of Commissioners Of Pilotage of the State of New York ………………………… Page 4 A New But Familiar Face ……………………………………….. Page 5 Coordination with the United States Coast …..….…………. Page 5 Guard and other Agencies 2016 Operating Budget …………………………………………. Page 6 Legislation …………………………………………………………. Page 7 Regulations ……...………………………………...……………… Page 7 Rate Making Matters …………………………………………….. Page 7 Assets, Liabilities and Contracts ……………………………… Page 8 The Completion of the 50 Foot Channel …………………….. Page 9 A Liberty Comes Home: Operation New York, New York .. Page 10 The Rejuvenation of Fleet Week ……………………………... Page12 The Arrival of the Cutter Eagle ………………………………. Page 13 A
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the William A. Baker Collection
    Guide to The William A. Baker Collection His Designs and Research Files 1925-1991 The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collections of MIT Museum Kurt Hasselbalch and Kara Schneiderman © 1991 Massachusetts Institute of Technology T H E W I L L I A M A . B A K E R C O L L E C T I O N Papers, 1925-1991 First Donation Size: 36 document boxes Processed: October 1991 583 plans By: Kara Schneiderman 9 three-ring binders 3 photograph books 4 small boxes 3 oversized boxes 6 slide trays 1 3x5 card filing box Second Donation Size: 2 Paige boxes (99 folders) Processed: August 1992 20 scrapbooks By: Kara Schneiderman 1 box of memorabilia 1 portfolio 12 oversize photographs 2 slide trays Access The collection is unrestricted. Acquisition The materials from the first donation were given to the Hart Nautical Collections by Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. The materials from the second donation were given to the Hart Nautical Collections by the estate of Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. Copyright Requests for permission to publish material or use plans from this collection should be discussed with the Curator of the Hart Nautical Collections. Processing Processing of this collection was made possible through a grant from Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. 2 Guide to The William A. Baker Collection T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Biographical Sketch ..............................................................................................................4 Scope and Content Note .......................................................................................................5 Series Listing
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume 64, Number 4
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 64 Number 4 Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume Article 1 64, Number 64 1985 Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume 64, Number 4 Florida Historical Society [email protected] Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Society, Florida Historical (1985) "Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume 64, Number 4," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 64 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol64/iss4/1 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume 64, Number 4 Published by STARS, 1985 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 64 [1985], No. 4, Art. 1 COVER Phosphate, after it was discovered in 1889, became a major Florida industry. The hard-rock phosphate region was centered around the Ocala-Dunnellon area. Land-pebble deposits were to the south in Polk, Hillsborough, Manatee, and Hardee counties. This photograph, circa 1890, is enlarged from a post card manufactured by the Valentine & Sons’ Publishing Company, Ltd., New York. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol64/iss4/1 2 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume 64, Number 4 The Volume LXIV, Number 4 April 1986 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY COPYRIGHT 1986 by the Florida Historical Society, Tampa, Florida. Second class postage paid at Tampa and DeLeon Springs, Florida. Printed by E. O. Painter Printing Co., DeLeon Springs, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the President SIGNIFICANT
    The Newsletter of JMS Naval Architects Naval Architecture · Salvage Engineering · Marine Engineering · Marine Surveying 2020 Volume 23 ENGINEER & DESIGN: WORKBOATS Letter from the President Dear Readers, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Takes institutions and National Laboratories involved Delivery of Research Vessel Designed by JMS in oceanographic research. JMS has been busy this Naval Architects past year with a wide The R/V VIRGINIA replaces the 65-foot R/V BAY variety of projects for The 93-foot research vessel, R/V VIRGINIA was EAGLE, a converted oil-rig tender that has been v e s s e l o w n e r s a n d in service at VIMS since 1987. The BAY EAGLE officially commissioned at a dedication operators representing all will be retired after a year of side-by-side ceremony in Yorktown, VA in April 2019. JMS corners of the maritime industry. We’ve seen the Naval Architects was selected by the Virginia comparison and calibration tows. The new delivery of several of our designs such as the R/V Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) to perform vessel will support fisheries research projects VIRGINIA for the Virginia Institute of Marine the concept through contract-level design and and greatly expand VIMS’ capability to perform general oceanographic research in the Science and a modular floating dry dock in Chesapeake Bay as well as Mid-Atlantic coastal Canada. Several more of our designs are on the waters. VIMS Director, Dr. John Wells, noted the drawing board including tank barges for fueling VIRGINIA “is indeed a bold vessel.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    mma BOARD OF TRUSTEES Richard C. Hedreen (as of 30 September 2004) Eric H. Holder Jr. Victoria P. Sant Raymond J. Horowitz Chairman Robert J. Hurst Earl A. Powell III Alberto Ibarguen Robert F. Erburu Betsy K. Karel Julian Ganz, Jr. Lmda H. Kaufman David 0. Maxwell James V. Kimsey John C. Fontaine Mark J. Kington Robert L. Kirk Leonard A. Lauder & Alexander M. Laughlin Robert F. Erburu Victoria P. Sant Victoria P. Sant Joyce Menschel Chairman President Chairman Harvey S. Shipley Miller John W. Snow Secretary of the Treasury John G. Pappajohn Robert F. Erburu Sally Engelhard Pingree Julian Ganz, Jr. Diana Prince David 0. Maxwell Mitchell P. Rales John C. Fontaine Catherine B. Reynolds KW,< Sharon Percy Rockefeller Robert M. Rosenthal B. Francis Saul II if Robert F. Erburu Thomas A. Saunders III Julian Ganz, Jr. David 0. Maxwell Chairman I Albert H. Small John W. Snow Secretary of the Treasury James S. Smith Julian Ganz, Jr. Michelle Smith Ruth Carter Stevenson David 0. Maxwell Roselyne C. Swig Victoria P. Sant Luther M. Stovall John C. Fontaine Joseph G. Tompkins Ladislaus von Hoffmann John C. Whitehead Ruth Carter Stevenson IJohn Wilmerding John C. Fontaine J William H. Rehnquist Alexander M. Laughlin Dian Woodner ,id Chief Justice of the Robert H. Smith ,w United States Victoria P. Sant John C. Fontaine President Chair Earl A. Powell III Frederick W. Beinecke Director Heidi L. Berry Alan Shestack W. Russell G. Byers Jr. Deputy Director Elizabeth Cropper Melvin S. Cohen Dean, Center for Advanced Edwin L. Cox Colin L. Powell John W.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CITY of WASHINGTON. [6 Ben
    YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES Case No. 2,770. THE CITY OF WASHINGTON. [6 Ben. 138.]1 District Court, E. D. New York. June, 1872.2 COLLISION AT SEA—STEAMER AND PILOT BOAT—LIGHTS—BURDEN OF PROOF. 1. A steamer, bound to the westward, discovered the flash lights of a pilot boat to the northward, about abeam. She replied to them, indicating that she wanted a pilot, and changed her course to N. W. by N. The pilot boat changed her course to the southward and westward to meet the steamer, showing her torches as she proceeded. The wind was fresh. When the vessels were four or five lengths apart, the courses of the vessels were crossing, and the starboard side of the steamer was the lee side. She showed a light on that side to guide the pilot to his place, and a pilot left the pilot boat in a yawl, having with him a light, to board the steamer. The steamer was kept in motion, and starboarded her helm, and, before the yawl boat reached her, she ran into the pilot boat and sank her. The pilot boat had no masthead light, but the light, which the pilot carried as he went into the yawl, was seen by those in charge of the steamer: Held, that the steamer was in fault, in not stopping still before she reached the pilot boat, and also in starboard- ing her helm. [Cited in The Columbia, 27 Fed. 708; The La Champagne, 43 Fed. 447.] 2. The burden was on the pilot boat of proving that the absence of the masthead light, which she should have carried, did not contribute to the collision.
    [Show full text]
  • Impa Newsletter
    ISSUE NUMBER 44 / JULY 2018 THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME PILOTS’ ASSOCIATION IN THIS ISSUE: A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT 1 Message from the President Fellow Pilots, 3 Message from the As I meet with IMPA members around the world, I am often asked about the much- Secretary General publicized efforts to develop and introduce so-called “autonomous ships.” The IMPA 4 5 Ps to Make You More leadership has devoted considerable time and resources to following this subject and PPU Ready participating in debates about it. Pilots, and indeed most other people knowledgeable 6 Pilot Boat Capsized Due to about ship operations, recognize that much of the expressed enthusiasm is unrealistic and Wake and Currents generated by technology vendors and coastal government administrations rather than the ship operating community. IMPA Safety Campaign Despite the claims that we hear and read We must, however, resist the urge to be 7 Comment by Houston Pilot Captain Michael about, there will not be unmanned, remotely dismissive about the autonomous ship Phillips navigated, or fully autonomous ocean-going movement. While many of its projections may vessels arriving in pilotage waters in the be unrealistic, there is a development ongoing 8 Grounding Report: foreseeable future. Autonomous operations right now that may pose a serious near-term Pilot Lacked Information After Engine Failure may be introduced in the relatively near term in risk to pilotage and global ship operations. This certain inland waters with small single-purpose development may have consequences that 10 Poorly Maintained Pilot vessels. But operating large commercial vessels extend beyond autonomous ships.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WANATA. [4 Ben
    YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES Case No. 17,138. THE WANATA. [4 Ben. 310.]1 District Court, S. D. New York. Oct., 1870.2 COLLISION OFF BARNEGAT—PILOT BOAT AT ANCHOR—LIGHTS—ANCHOR WATCH. 1. A pilot boat, at anchor, is not required to show a white light at her masthead, and a flare up light every fifteen minutes, as required by the 8th article of the rules for preventing collisions (13 Stat. 58), but must show the white light in a globular lantern, provided for by the 7th article. 2. A pilot boat was at anchor off Barnegat, showing a proper light, but having no watch on deck. She was run into by a schooner which was running in, under shortened sail, to anchor, the wind being so violent that the schooner was unable to keep her own side lights burning. Held, that the schooner was in fault in not keeping a vigilant lookout, and that the absence of an anchor watch on the pilot boat, under the circumstances, was not a fault contributing to the collision. [Cited in The Lady Franklin, Case No. 7,984.] In admiralty. Beebe, Donohue & Cooke, for libellants. J. H. Choate, for claimants. BLATCHFORD, District Judge. This is a libel filed against the schooner Wanata, to recover for the damages caused to the libellants by the sinking and total loss of the pilot boat Josiah Johnson, and of certain clothing and other property on board of her, through a collision which occurred between the two vessels, about 9 o'clock p. m., on the 6th of March, 1869.
    [Show full text]