Congressional Record—House H3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H3 June 3, 1998 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H3 House for 1 minute and to revise and minute and to revise and extend her re- for the 21st Century'', but not included extend his remarks.) marks.) in the conference report to H.R. 2400, Mr. MILLER of California. Mr. Ms. DELAURO. Mr. Speaker, I rise and for other purposes, and that the Speaker, before I give my one minute, today to commend the voters of Cali- bill be considered as passed. I just would like to publicly thank our fornia for rejecting Proposition 226. Re- The Clerk read the title of the bill. colleague, the gentleman from Ohio publican leaders in the House were sup- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. (Mr. HALL) for his trip to Sudan and porting this initiative in order to si- Pease). Is there objection to the re- calling attention to a tragic, tragic sit- lence the voices of American workers quest of the gentleman from Pennsyl- uation. I thank him. and America's working families. And vania? Mr. Speaker, yesterday, in the Cali- by voting down Proposition 226, Cali- Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin. Mr. fornia elections, the people of Califor- fornia voters stood up for their right to Speaker, reserving the right to object, nia rejected a cynical attempt to stifle participate in the political process. if I could, just to embellish a little bit the voices of working families in Amer- Right now, working families do not on my reservation, the bill that passed ica, to stifle the voices of concerned have enough say in our political proc- Congress last week had a provision nonprofit organizations. ess. In 1996, wealthy corporations and that had a major impact on southeast- Proposition 226 was an effort by the business representatives poured more ern Wisconsin. This was a provision Republican leadership and the Repub- than $650 million into campaigns, 11 that was not contained in the original lican Party to lash out at working fam- times what labor unions, the represent- House version of the bill nor was it ilies and to deny members of unions atives of working Americans, were able contained in the bill when it passed the the ability to participate in the politi- to spend. Senate. However, during the conference cal process in this country, a right that We need to pass genuine campaign fi- committee, there was an amendment they are guaranteed under the Con- nance reform that increases the par- added to the conference committee re- stitution. It was cynically dubbed the ticipation of average working families port. That amendment basically gives Paycheck Protection Act. It had noth- and limits the role of wealthy special the Governor of the State of Wisconsin ing to do with protecting people's pay- interests. We need less money in our unilateral authority, from my perspec- checks. It had everything to do with political process. We need to restore tive, as to how $241 million should be trying to get back at organized labor in Americans' faith in our political proc- spent for transportation projects in this country for the very effective cam- ess. We need to pass meaningful cam- Wisconsin, money which was by agree- paign they ran in the last national ment originally set aside for southeast- elections on behalf of President Clin- paign finance reform today. f ern Wisconsin. The reason that we ton and on behalf of many Members of heard from the State and from others the Congress where they told the truth b 1415 that this provision was in the bill was about what the Republican leadership DIABETES because of the concern that the State and majority was trying to do in this of Wisconsin would lose this $241 mil- House of Representatives in denying (Mr. CUMMINGS asked and was lion. It is my belief that at this point, people the rights and fundamental given permission to address the House that is no longer a danger. And so what basic ability to raise their family. for 1 minute and to revise and extend I am going to propose to the chairman f his remarks.) of the committee in just a moment or ON CHARACTER Mr. CUMMINGS. Mr. Speaker, diabe- two is unanimous consent for an tes is a disease of national impact. Ac- (Mr. TIAHRT asked and was given amendment which would return the cording to the American Diabetes As- language to what I perceive to be the permission to address the House for 1 sociation, there are an estimated 15.7 minute and to revise and extend his re- original agreement between the par- million people who suffer from this dis- ties. If I may, Mr. Speaker, the con- marks.) ease. The frightening fact is that there Mr. TIAHRT. Mr. Speaker, in many ference report language, section (n) are over 5 million people that have it foreign countries it is difficult to do Substitute Project, Section 1045 of the and are unaware of it. business without a payoff or a bribe. Intermodal Surface Transportation Ef- Medical technology has not yet dis- Just slide some money across the hand ficiency Act of 1991 has several sections covered a way to prevent this disorder. and doors open. It happens in many to it. My amendment would strike the Only treatment is available. It is countries that do not have high moral second paragraph and would insert the known as the silent killer because it standards of right and wrong. But it is following two paragraphs: seldom gives any warning of its pres- not acceptable in America. Not until Paragraph 2. ``Notwithstanding para- ence. Many people are unaware that now. It appears something has graph (1) and subsection (c) of this sec- they have diabetes until they suffer changed. tion, upon the request of the Governor Our high moral standards driven by from one of its life-threatening com- of the State of Wisconsin, submitted character and a strong sense of right plications, blindness, kidney disease, after consultation with appropriate and wrong now seem to have sunk to a nerve disease, amputations, heart dis- local government officials by October new low of a mere political contribu- ease and stroke. 1, 2000, the Secretary may approve 1 or tion and doors open. Just a few lucra- The African-American community is more substitute projects in lieu of the tive political donations from the Com- nearly twice as likely to suffer from substitute project approved by the Sec- munist Chinese and a big U.S. corpora- this disorder that can cause the body retary under paragraph (1) and sub- tion will change export policy and to not produce enough insulin or not section (c) of this section.'' doors will open. properly use it. Over 2.3 million Afri- ``(3) Funds available for 1 or more The administration has taken high- can-Americans have been diagnosed substitute projects under paragraph (2) tech satellite export waivers from the and over half are unaware that they shall be used for transportation prior- Department of Defense and the State have this silent and deadly disorder. ities associated with the East-West Department and given it to the Com- I urge this Congress to reduce the Corridor Project in southeastern Wis- merce Department, making it easier number of Americans suffering from di- consin.'' for doors to open. Now an American abetes and increase funding for bio- That would be the amendment that I company may have exported high tech- medical research. am going to ask the gentleman for nical information that jeopardizes our f unanimous consent for. The reason I am doing this, Mr. Speaker, is that I security, our national security. TEA 21 RESTORATION ACT It may happen in other countries, but believe that this is a fight, and it truly it should never happen here. Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask is a fight, in the State between State f unanimous consent for the immediate officials and local officials as to how consideration in the House of the bill this money should be spent. There was CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 226 (H.R. 3978) to restore provisions agreed a delicate balance of power that had (Ms. DELAURO asked and was given to by the conferees to H.R. 2400, enti- been achieved in the prior language permission to address the House for 1 tled the ``Transportation Equity Act that had been agreed to on a bipartisan H4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE June 3, 1998 basis. It is my understanding that the section is not intended to be a limitation on Section 3: State Transportation has asked for the level of federal funding provided under any Restores the National Historic Covered this language. Unfortunately, I was not Bridge Preservation program. future full funding grant agreement. The actual Restores the Substitute Project for the aware of this language until very, very federal share for projects eligible for full fund- Barney Circle Freeway, Washington, D.C. late in the process. I do not think that ing grant agreements shall be negotiated be- Restores Fiscal, Administrative and Other it is good public policy for one person tween the designated recipient and the Sec- Amendments included in both House and whether it is a Governor, a Mayor or a retary. For example, the amounts included in Senate bills. President to have sole discretion over subsection 3030(c) for the Dallas-North Cen- Clarifies program funding categories for $241 million. I think that the balance of tral Extension project do not reflect a cap on Puerto Rico and continues current law pen- alties for Puerto Rico for non-compliance power shifted dramatically under this the Federal share of project costs included in with the federal minimum drinking age re- amendment.
Recommended publications
  • Maturity Schedule
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 22, 2018 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER EXISTING LAW, AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE "TAX MATTERS" FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry-Only Insured Rating (AGM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: S&P “BBB-” See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE” herein. $5,570,000 FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 169 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) CONTRACT REVENUE BONDS (ROAD FACILITIES) SERIES 2018 The bonds described above (the “Bonds”) are special obligations of Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 169 (the “Master District” or the “District”) payable solely from and to the extent of payments required to be made to the Trustee (as herein defined) by the District and Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District Nos. 170, 171, 172 and 173 (the “MUD Participants”) from proceeds of an unlimited annual ad valorem tax, levied by each MUD Participant or from other revenues available to such MUD Participant (the “Road Contract Payment(s)”). Payment of Road Contract Payments by MUD Participants and use of such proceeds by the Master District to pay debt service on the Bonds is governed by the Contract for Financing, Operation, and Maintenance of Regional Facilities, as amended (the “Master District Contract”) as described more fully herein under “MASTER DISTRICT CONTRACT.” The Bonds are obligations of the Master District and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Fulshear, any of the MUD Participants (except the Master District), or any entity other than the Master District.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Baytown
    CITY OF BAYTOWN NOTICE OF MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012 5:30 P.M. BAYTOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER 2401 MARKET STREET BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF QUORUM 1. MINUTES a. Minutes - January 17, 2012 Consider Approving the Minutes of the Commission's Regular Meeting for January 17, 2012. b. Minutes - February 21, 2012 Consider Approving the Minutes of the Commission's Regular Meeting for February 21, 2012. 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION a. Receive citizen communication concerning the placement of two “No Parking” signs along Cinnamon Street in the Crockett Subdivision. Receive a citizen communication by Tammie Jones to remove two of the “No Parking” signs along the outside curve of Cinnamon Street and Curry Street that were approved by the City Council in accordance with Chapter 94 “Traffic and Vehicles,” Article II “Administration,” Division 2 “Enforcement,” Section 94-63 “Authority and duties of the Planning and Zoning Commission” of the Baytown Code of Ordinances. 3. BUSINESS ITEMS a. Election of Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson Discuss and consider the election of a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with Section 2-322 of the Baytown Code of Ordinances. b. Reconsider placement of "No Parking" signs within Crockett Park Subdivision. Consider a motion to reconsider the placement of certain "No Parking" signs within Consider a motion to reconsider the placement of certain "No Parking" signs within Crockett Park Subdivision. c. Discuss and consider a request by Tammie Jones, a resident of the Crockett Park Subdivision, to remove the “No Parking” signs at the following locations: outside curve of Cinnamon Street and Curry Street - Planning and Development Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Statement Dated November 9, 2020 Cinco
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 9, 2020 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, UNDER EXISTING LAW, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE “TAX MATTERS” FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry-Only Insured Rating (BAM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: S&P “A+” (stable outlook) See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE” herein. CINCO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) $19,515,000 CONTRACT REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2020 The Contract Revenue Bonds, Series 2020 (the “Bonds”) are obligations solely of Cinco Municipal Utility District No. 1 (the “Master District” or the “District”) payable solely from and to the extent of payments required to be made to the Trustee (as herein defined) by all utility districts within the Master District Service Area (the “Participants”) from proceeds of an unlimited annual ad valorem tax, levied by each Participant or from other revenues available to such Participant (the “Contract Payment”). Payment of Contract Payments by Participants and use of such proceeds by the District to pay debt service on the Bonds is governed by the Contract for Financing and Operation of Regional Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities and Regional Water Supply and Delivery Facilities (the “Master District Contract”) as described more fully herein under “MASTER DISTRICT CONTRACT.” The Bonds are obligations of the Master District and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, Harris County, the City of Houston, any of the Participants except the Master District, or any entity other than the Master District.
    [Show full text]
  • $1,545,000 Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 3, 2018 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER EXISTING LAW, AND INTEREST ON BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE “TAX MATTERS” FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED AS “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SEE “TAX MATTERS—QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS.” Insured Rating (AGM): S&P “AA” (stable outlook) NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry Only Moody’s “A2” (stable outlook) Underlying Rating: Moody’s “Baa1” See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL $1,545,000 BOND INSURANCE” herein. FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 143 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) UNLIMITED TAX PARK BONDS SERIES 2019 The bonds described above (the “Bonds”) are obligations solely of Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 143 (the “District”) and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Houston, or any entity other than the District. The Bonds, when issued, will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the District and will be payable from the proceeds of an annual ad valorem tax, without legal limitation as to rate or amount, levied against taxable property within the District. THE BONDS ARE SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN. See “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.” Dated Date: January 1, 2019 Due: September 1, as shown below Principal of the Bonds is payable at maturity or earlier redemption at the principal payment office of the paying agent/registrar, initially The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Dallas, Texas (the “Paying Agent/Registrar”) upon surrender of the Bonds for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Houston University Has a New Head Honcho He Moved to the Bayou City from Indiana
    Catholic Houston university has a new head honcho He moved to the Bayou City from Indiana. BACK PAGE, 39 JUNE 30-JULY 6, 2017 • VOL. 48, NO. 8 • $6.00 LARGEST FOR-PROFIT, PRIVATE EMPLOYERS 19 COVER STORY RAISING American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use THE BAR Houston apartment amenities have reached new heights of luxury. Here’s how they’ll revolutionize the industry. 16 One Herman Place includes a rooftop skylounge among its amenities. COURTESY DEAL OF THE WEEK TRANSPORTATION COMING SOON Linn Energy forms JV Trucking co. to with Oklahoma co. ramp up hiring The joint venture is targeting an initial The hires are related to a federal law public offering later this year. going into effect in December. OLIVIA PULSINELLI, 4 JACK WITTHAUS, 12 RESIDENTIAL STRATEGIES Howard Hughes to How to deal with After 47 years, launch community cyberattacks Kolache Shoppe in Conroe Recent and on-going cyberattacks against the energy sector have to expand UPTOWN Older Millennials and Baby Boomers challenged the oil and gas industry The retailer will open its second will be the target buyers. boardroom’s traditional perspective on location at a mixed-use project MEET THE LARGEST PAUL TAKAHASHI, 6 risk. 13 underway in the Heights. EMPLOYERS IN UPTOWN 20 RETAIL HUB, 11 Breaking news online r HoustonBusinessJournal.com On smartphones and tablets HoustonBusinessJournal.com/apps Daily email updates L HoustonBusinessJournal.com/email 2 HOUSTON BUSINESS JOURNAL JUNE 30-JULY 6, 2017 THE LOOP R PEOPLE IN THE ISSUE R WHAT’S GOING ON ABC MNO Brinsden, Jonathan 17 McLeroy, Shannon .
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Centur....Xml
    G:\COMP\INFRA\TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTUR....XML TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21st CENTURY [Public Law 105–178, Approved June 9, 1998] [As Amended Through P.L. 114–94, Enacted December 4, 2015] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of Public Law 105–178. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transpor- tation Equity Act for the 21st Century’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorizations and Programs Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • CINCO SOUTHWEST MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3 (A Political Subdivision of the State of Texas Located Within Fort Bend County)
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 5, 2012 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER EXISTING LAW, AND THE BONDS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS AND CORPORATIONS, EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR CORPORATIONS. SEE "TAX MATTERS" FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED "QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS" FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SEE "TAX MATTERS—Not Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations.” NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry-Only CINCO SOUTHWEST MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) $1,715,000 $2,005,000 UNLIMITED TAX BONDS UNLIMITED TAX PARK BONDS SERIES 2012A SERIES 2012B The $1,715,000 Unlimited Tax Bonds, Series 2012A (the “Series 2012A Bonds”) and the $2,005,000 Unlimited Tax Park Bonds, Series 2012B (the “Series 2012B Bonds”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Bonds”), are obligations solely of Cinco Southwest Municipal Utility District No. 3 (the “District”) and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Houston or any entity other than the District. The Bonds, when issued, will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the District and will be payable from the proceeds of an annual ad valorem tax, without legal limitation as to rate or amount, levied against taxable property within the District. THE BONDS ARE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED HEREIN. See “RISK FACTORS.” Interest accrues from: December 1, 2012 Due: September 1, as shown below Principal of the Bonds is payable at maturity or earlier redemption at the principal payment office of the paying agent/registrar, initially The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Dallas, Texas (the “Paying Agent/Registrar”) upon surrender of the Bonds for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Deep Testing of 2044 Acres of Former Harlem Prison Farm Property in the Proposed Aliana Development in Fort Bend County, Texas
    Volume 2018 Article 41 2018 Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Deep Testing of 2044 Acres of Former Harlem Prison Farm Property in the Proposed Aliana Development in Fort Bend County, Texas James G. Foradas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Foradas, James G. (2018) "Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Deep Testing of 2044 Acres of Former Harlem Prison Farm Property in the Proposed Aliana Development in Fort Bend County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2018, Article 41. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2018/iss1/41 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Deep Testing of 2044 Acres of Former Harlem Prison Farm Property in the Proposed Aliana Development in Fort Bend County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2018/iss1/41 HRA Gray & Pape INTENSIVE PEDESTRIAN SURVEY AND DEEP TESTING OF 2044 ACRES OF FORMER HARLEM PRISON FARM PROPERTY IN THE PROPOSED ALIANA DEVELOPMENT IN FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS USACE Individual Permit 24124 USACE Nationwide Permit D-18-168 Prepared for: Berg Oliver Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1170000 Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED FEBURARY 11, 2020 IN THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL, UNDER EXISTING LAW, INTEREST ON THE BONDS IS EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS INCOME FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES AND INTEREST ON BONDS IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON INDIVIDUALS. SEE “TAX MATTERS” FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL. THE BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN DESIGNATED AS “QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS” FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry Only Insured Rating (BAM): S&P “AA” Underlying Rating: Moody’s “Baa3” See “MUNICIPAL BOND RATING” and “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE” herein. $1,170,000 FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 194 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Fort Bend County) UNLIMITED TAX ROAD BONDS SERIES 2020 The bonds described above (the “Bonds”) are obligations solely of Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 194 (the “District”) and are not obligations of the State of Texas, Fort Bend County, the City of Houston, or any entity other than the District. The Bonds, when issued, will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the District and will be payable from the proceeds of an annual ad valorem tax levied, without legal limitation as to rate or amount, against all taxable property within the District. THE BONDS ARE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN. See “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.” Dated Date: March 1, 2020 Due: September 1, as shown below Principal of the Bonds is payable at maturity or earlier redemption at the principal payment office of the paying agent/registrar, initially The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Dallas, Texas (the “Paying Agent/Registrar”) upon surrender of the Bonds for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Signed Agreement
    22E STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF FORT BEND § AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Fort Bend County, (hereinafter "County"), a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Texas, and Huitt-Zollars, Inc., (hereinafter "Contractor"), a company authorized to conduct business in the State of Texas. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, County desires that Contractor provide professional engineering services for the construction of a six-lane boulevard (Mason Road)from Waterside Village Drive to Lewisville Drive and additional turn lanes at Grand Parkway (SH 99) for the Mason Road Project, Numbers 17401 and 17403, under the 2017 Mobility Bond Program (hereinafter "Services") pursuant to SOQ14-025; and WHEREAS, County has determined Contractor is the most highly qualified provider of the desired Services on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications, and County and Contractor have negotiated to reach a fair and reasonable amount of compensation for the provision of such Services, as required under Chapter 2254 of the Texas Government Code; and WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it is qualified and desires to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1. Scope of Services Contractor shall render the professional engineering services, including the preliminary engineering, final engineering, geotechnical, surveying, bidding and construction phase services
    [Show full text]
  • City of Baytown
    CITY OF BAYTOWN NOTICE OF MEETING CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2012 6:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 2401 MARKET STREET BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF QUORUM PLEDGE AND INVOCATION Council Member Scott Sheley, District No. 2 1. MINUTES a. Consider Approving the Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting for January 12, 2012 - City Clerk. Consider approving the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting held on January 12, 2012. 2. RECOGNITIONS AND CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Citizen Communication: Joan Martin. Ms. Joan Martin requests to address Council to persuade the Council to pass and enforce rules to stop dogs from running loose. b. Years of Service Awards - Human Resources. Recognize City of Baytown employees for their Years of Service (5, 10, 15 plus years). c. Employee and Team of the Month - Human Resources. Present the Employee and Team of the Month for the month of December. d. Recognition: Daniel Adam Crespo - Administration. Present a Recognition to Daniel Adam Crespo for his outstanding community service and achievement of the Eagle Scout rank. 3. PROPOSED ORDINANCES a. Consider Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation and Refunding Bonds Series 2012 - Finance. Consider an ordinance authorizing the issuance of the City of Baytown, General Obligation and Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 and taking other action related thereto. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. First Public Hearing: Regarding a Strategic Partnership Agreement Related to a Limited Purpose Annexation with Chambers County Improvement District No. 3 for Approximately 948 Acres of Land in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Generally Located East and West of Texas State Highway 99 and Needlepoint Road (FM 2354) Approximately 1,900 Feet South of Interstate 10 in Chambers County, Texas - Planning and Development Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Jensen Drive Scrap
    The following is an Adobe Acrobat reproduction of the official Community Relations Plan for Jensen Drive Scrap No graphic illustrations are included with this electronic version, but are available with the printed versions as part of the Jensen Drive Scrap repository records at Kashmere Gardens Branch Library 5411 Pardee Street Houston, Texas and/or TNRCC Records Management Center Austin, Texas February 1999 Scroll Down to View FEBRUARY 1999 Jensen Drive Scrap State Superfund Site Houston, Texas Community Relations Plan Updated: February 1999 REMEDIATION DIVISION - SUPERFUND printed on recycled paper TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN for REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION and FEASIBILITY STUDY Jensen Drive Scrap State Superfund Site Houston, Harris County, Texas February 1999 Office of Waste Management Remediation Division Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 12100 Park 35 Circle Building D Austin, Texas 78753 Telephone -- 1-800/633-9363 (Within Texas calls only) A:jensen2.crp.wpd jshields 02/99 2 COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN for REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Jensen Drive Scrap State Superfund Site 3603 Jensen Drive Houston, Harris County, Texas February 1999 Inquiries relating to the Jensen Drive State Superfund Site should be directed to: Joe Shields, Community Relations Coordinator Remediation Division - Superfund Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Physical Address: 12100 Park 35 Circle Austin, Texas 78753 Mailing Address: PO Box 13087 MC 225 Austin, Texas 78711 Telephone:1-800/633-9363 (Ask for Ext: 0666) (800 Number within Texas calls only) 1-512/239-0666 A:jensen2.crp.wpd jshields 02/99 3 Table of Contents Overview of Community Relations Plan ...............................1 Site Profile: A.
    [Show full text]