DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Power of the Medieval

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Political Power of the Medieval THE POLITICAL POWER OF THE MEDIEVAL ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITIES AND THE MAMLUK-ILKHANATE WARFARE BETWEEN 1284 AND 1304: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH AND THE ASSYRIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH IN CILICIAN ARMENIA AND ILKHANATE by Aidar Saduakassov A thesis submitted in partial fulfilMent of the requireMents for the degree of Master of Arts in Eurasian Studies at NAZARBAYEV UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES NUR-SULTAN, KAZAKHSTAN 2021 i ii © 2021 AIDAR SADUAKASSOV All Rights Reserved iii TABLE OF CONTENTS AcknowledgeMents......................................................................................................... v Abstract........................................................................................................................... vi Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Literature review..................................................................................... 8 1.1. The Mongol MaMluk Interactions...................................................................... 9 1.2. The political power of Nestorian clergy in Ilkhanate in the end of 13th century............................................................................................................................ 14 1.3. The political power of the Armenian ecclesiastical authorities in the end of 13th century............................................................................................................................ 17 1.4. The MaMluk Sultanate and the religious policies towards domestic Christians........................................................................................................................ 21 Chapter 2. PriMary sources............................................................................................. 29 2.1. Latin priMary sources ........................................................................................ 29 2.2. Armenian priMary sources................................................................................. 32 2.3. Persian priMary sources..................................................................................... 36 Chapter 3. Syriac source analysis................................................................................... 40 Chapter 4. The political power of the Nestorian ecclesiastical authorities and the Mongol conquest of MaMluks between 1284 and 1304................................................. 52 4.1. The political power of Nestorian clergy before the reign of Arghun khaN......... 53 4.2. The formation of the political power of the Nestorian clergy during Arghun khaN................................................................................................................................. 60 4.3. The political power of the Nestorians during the intermediary period............... 67 4.4. The political power of the Nestorian clergy during Ghazan khan ....................... 68 iv 4.5. The significance of the Nestorian clergy to the MaMluk Mongol warfare within the broader context which unifies 3 periods of khanships................................... 76 Chapter 5. The political power of the Armenian ecclesiastical authorities and the Mongol conquest of MaMluks between 1284 and 1304................................................. 82 5.1. The historical development of the Armenian Apostolic Church before 1269.... 84 5.2. The effect of the Mongol conquest to the Armenian ecclesiastical authorities during the power of Lewon II (1269-1289) ................................................................... 91 5.3. The political power of the Armenian ecclesiastical authorities in the Cilician Armenia during the power of Hetum II and his brothers (1289-1307).......................... 100 Chapter 6. Comparative analysis of the political power of the Armenian and Nestorian ecclesiastical authorities between 1284 and 1304.......................................... 113 Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 123 Bibliography................................................................................................................... 128 Appendix......................................................................................................................... 135 v Acknowledgements I would like to thank My thesis advisors Professor Daniel Beben and Professor Daniel Scarborough of School of Sciences and Humanities at Nazarbayev University. Their considerable expertise in IslaMic-Christian Medieval history as well as in historical Methodology contributed Mine and helped Me to accomplish this project. Furthermore, I would like to express My gratitude to Professor Beben and Professor Scarborough for their contribution in finding priMary sources that was quite challenging due to the pandeMic outbreak. Without their help it would not be possible to finish this thesis. They were always in touch with Me, and under their supervision I received an eye-opening acadeMic experience that for sure will contribute to my future acadeMic career as a scholar. I also would like to acknowledge Professor Reuven AMitai of the Hebrew University of JerusaleM who is the external reader of the thesis. I aM grateful for his valuable suggestions and feedbacks regarding religious and Military history of Cilician Armenia. Professor AMitai’s acadeMic input enhanced My knowledge about Caucasian and Middle Eastern history. I aM also grateful to Professor AMitai for his suggestions regarding the ArmeniaN priMary sources and ways of utilizing theM. Furthermore, I would like to express My gratitude to Professor Uli SchaMiloglu for his acadeMic contribution to My research project. Particularly, his expertise in Syriac and Latin Medieval sources related the Mongol EMpire helped Me to develop this paper. Undoubtably, his knowledge in the Mongol history is much appreciated. Finally, I would like to express My profound gratitude to My friends and faMily who always believe in Me. My friends and My faMily undoubtably support My acadeMic growth encouraging me to further creations. vi Abstract The Modern history often avoids researching the Marginalized Medieval Christian religious institutions due to the lack of their political significance. However, the Medieval accounts present the information about their significant role in the Mongol conquest of the MaMluk Sultanate. From the one hand, the study of the ecclesiastical representatives of the Assyrian Apostolic Church in the Mongol court is one of the underexplored topics in the Medieval history of Central Asia and Middle East. Morgan and Grousset explored the significance of the Nestorian authorities in the court as a Matter of the personal favorability of khans, however, the effect of the Mongol conquest to the power of Christians in Ilkhanate was undefined. Russell tried to exaMine this connection; however, her paradigm lacks scientific proofs and proper Methods of analysis. On the other hand, the studies of the Armenian Apostolic Church were better developed. Ghazarian analyzed the effects of the LatiN-Armenian encounters to the Armenian domestic politics. Dashdonbog explored how the Mongol- Armenian relationships affected the institutional power of the Armenian Church. However, the authors fail to exaMine the question of why the Armenian Church becaMe one of the Most significant religious entity aMong Marginalized Christian religions in the Middle East. This comparative study explores the relationships between the MaMluk-Ilkhanate warfare during 1284 and 1304 and the political power of the Nestorian and Armenian clergies in Ilkhanate and Cilician Armenia. The Main argument is that the political power of the Nestorian and Armenian ecclesiastical authorities was daMaged by the Mongol-MaMluk warfare between 1284 and 1304. In particular, apart the Military daMages of the warfare, the consequences of IslaMization of ilkhans and reciprocity with Catholics becaMe significant factors that explain the downward trend in political power of the Christian clergies in Cilician Armenia and Ilkhanate. Mainly, these factors were the intentional discourses to stiMulate the Military capabilities of the Armenians and Mongols through the attraction of the domestic and foreign alliances against vii MaMluks. Furthermore, the study will also prove that the political ties between Armenian kings and ecclesiastical authorities affected the survival of the Armenian Church and localization of the Nestorian clergy. Hereby, the institutional power, political positions in the courts, patronage and social status as well as repressions and institutional devastations are the Main variables that determine the political power of the ecclesiastical authorities in Ilkhanate and Cilician Armenia. The thesis Mainly explores the periods of Lewon II and Hetum II reigns in Cilician Armenia; and siMultaneously evaluates the period from Arghun khaN’s reign to Ghazan khan’s rule in Ilkhanate. The study uses content and linguistic-political discourse analyses as Major Methodological tools. The research is based on Syriac, Latin, Armenian and Persian priMary sources that were conducted between 13th and 16th centuries. In particular, the diplomatic reports, correspondences between rulers, ecclesiastical and IslaMic chronicles will be evaluated throughout the study. Hopefully, this paper will contribute to the political, Military and religious
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protagonist of Qubilai Khan's Unsuccessful
    BUQA CHĪNGSĀNG: PROTAGONIST OF QUBILAI KHAN’S UNSUCCESSFUL COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST THE HÜLEGÜID DYNASTY MUSTAFA UYAR* It is generally accepted that the dissolution of the Mongol Empire began in 1259, following the death of Möngke the Great Khan (1251–59)1. Fierce conflicts were to arise between the khan candidates for the empty throne of the Great Khanate. Qubilai (1260–94), the brother of Möngke in China, was declared Great Khan on 5 May 1260 in the emergency qurultai assembled in K’ai-p’ing, which is quite far from Qara-Qorum, the principal capital of Mongolia2. This event started the conflicts within the Mongolian Khanate. The first person to object to the election of the Great Khan was his younger brother Ariq Böke (1259–64), another son of Qubilai’s mother Sorqoqtani Beki. Being Möngke’s brother, just as Qubilai was, he saw himself as the real owner of the Great Khanate, since he was the ruler of Qara-Qorum, the main capital of the Mongol Khanate. Shortly after Qubilai was declared Khan, Ariq Böke was also declared Great Khan in June of the same year3. Now something unprecedented happened: there were two competing Great Khans present in the Mongol Empire, and both received support from different parts of the family of the empire. The four Mongol khanates, which should theo- retically have owed obedience to the Great Khan, began to act completely in their own interests: the Khan of the Golden Horde, Barka (1257–66) supported Böke. * Assoc. Prof., Ankara University, Faculty of Languages, History and Geography, Department of History, Ankara/TURKEY, [email protected] 1 For further information on the dissolution of the Mongol Empire, see D.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coins of the Later Ilkhanids
    THE COINS OF THE LATER ILKHANIDS : A TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1 BY SHEILA S. BLAIR Ghazan Khan was undoubtedly the most brilliant of the Ilkhanid rulers of Persia: not only a commander and statesman, he was also a linguist, architect and bibliophile. One of his most lasting contribu- tions was the reorganization of Iran's financial system. Upon his accession to the throne, the economy was in total chaos: his prede- cessor Gaykhatf's stop-gap issue of paper money to fill an empty treasury had been a fiasco 2), and the civil wars among Gaykhatu, Baydu, and Ghazan had done nothing to restore trade or confidence in the economy. Under the direction of his vizier Rashid al-Din, Ghazan delivered an edict ordering the standardization of the coinage in weight, purity, and type 3). Ghazan's standard double-dirham became the basis of Iran's monetary system for the next century. At varying intervals, however, the standard type was changed: a new shape cartouche was introduced, with slight variations in legend. These new types were sometimes issued at a modified weight standard. This paper will analyze the successive standard issues of Ghazan and his two successors, Uljaytu and Abu Said, in order to show when and why these new types were introduced. Following a des- cription of the successive types 4), the changes will be explained through 296 an investigation of the metrology and a correlation of these changes in type with economic and political history. Another article will pursue the problem of mint organization and regionalization within this standard imperial system 5).
    [Show full text]
  • Il-Khanate Empire
    1 Il-Khanate Empire 1250s, after the new Great Khan, Möngke (r.1251–1259), sent his brother Hülegü to MICHAL BIRAN expand Mongol territories into western Asia, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel primarily against the Assassins, an extreme Isma‘ilite-Shi‘ite sect specializing in political The Il-Khanate was a Mongol state that ruled murder, and the Abbasid Caliphate. Hülegü in Western Asia c.1256–1335. It was known left Mongolia in 1253. In 1256, he defeated to the Mongols as ulus Hülegü, the people the Assassins at Alamut, next to the Caspian or state of Hülegü (1218–1265), the dynasty’s Sea, adding to his retinue Nasir al-Din al- founder and grandson of Chinggis Khan Tusi, one of the greatest polymaths of the (Genghis Khan). Centered in Iran and Muslim world, who became his astrologer Azerbaijan but ruling also over Iraq, Turkme- and trusted advisor. In 1258, with the help nistan, and parts of Afghanistan, Anatolia, of various Mongol tributaries, including and the southern Caucasus (Georgia, many Muslims, he brutally conquered Bagh- Armenia), the Il-Khanate was a highly cos- dad, eliminating the Abbasid Caliphate that mopolitan empire that had close connections had nominally led the Muslim world for more with China and Western Europe. It also had a than 500 years (750–1258). Hülegü continued composite administration and legacy that into Syria, but withdrew most of his troops combined Mongol, Iranian, and Muslim after hearing of Möngke’s death (1259). The elements, and produced some outstanding defeat of the remnants of his troops by the cultural achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mongol City of Ghazaniyya: Destruction, Spatial Reconstruction, and Preservation of the Urban Heritage1
    Atri Hatef Naiemi The Mongol City of Ghazaniyya: Destruction, Spatial Reconstruction, and Preservation of the Urban Heritage1 Hülegü Khan (r. 1256-1265), a grandson of Chinggis Khan, founded the Ilkhanate in Iran in 1256 as the southwestern sector of the Mongol Empire. Mongol campaigns in Iran in the thirteenth century caused extensive destruction in different aspects of the Iranians’ social life and built environment. However, the political stability after the arrival of Hülegü intensified the process of urban development. Along with the reconstruction of the cities that had been extensively destroyed during the Mongol attack, the Ilkhans founded a number of new settlements. Their architectural and urban projects were mostly conducted in the northwest of present-day Iran, with some exceptions, for instance the city of Khabushan in Khurasan which was largely rebuilt by Hülegü and the notables of his court.2 In western Iran, Hülegü firstly focused his attention on the reconstruction of Baghdad, but following the designation of Azerbaijan as the headquarters of the Mongols, his urban development activities extended to this region. Maragha was chosen as the first capital of the Mongols and the most 1 This article has been adapted from a lecture presented in November 2019 at the Aga Khan Program in MIT. The research for this project has been facilitated by fellowship held with the Aga Khan program of MIT. I would like to thank Professors Nasser Rabbat and James Wescoat for their hospitality during the four months I spent at MIT in 2019. 2 In addition to Hülegü, Ghazan Khan also erected magnificent buildings in Khabushan.
    [Show full text]
  • Coat of Arms of Armenia - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Coat of arms of Armenia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Armenia Coat of arms of Armenia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The national coat of arms of Armenia consists of an eagle and a lion supporting a shield. The coat of arms combines new and old symbols. The eagle and lion are ancient Armenian symbols dating from the first Armenian kingdoms that existed prior to Christ. The current coat of arms was adopted on April 19, 1992 by the Armenian Supreme Council decision. On June 15, 2006, the law on the state coat of arms of Armenia was passed by the Armenian Parliament. Contents 1 Symbolism 1.1 Shield 1.2 Eagle and Lion 1.3 Five vital elements 2 History 2.1 Coat of arms of the Democratic Republic of Armenia 2.2 Transcaucasian SFSR 2.3 Soviet coat of arms 3 References 4 See also 5 External links Symbolism Shield The shield itself consists of many components. In the center is a depiction of Mount Ararat with Noah's Ark sitting atop it. According to tradition, the ark is said to have finally rested on the mountain after the great flood. Ararat is considered the national symbol of Armenia and thus is of principle importance to the coat of arms. Surrounding Mount Ararat are symbols of old Armenian dynasties. In the lower left portion of the shield, there are two eagles looking at each other, symbolizing the length of the Armenian territory during the reign of the Artaxiad Dynasty that ruled in the 1st century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Politico-Economic Conditions of Ilkhanid Coins from Different Mint Houses by PIXE
    Sociology and Anthropology 2(2): 29-34, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/sa.2014.020201 Politico-Economic Conditions of Ilkhanid Coins from Different Mint Houses by PIXE Javad Neyetani1, Amirhossein Salehi1,*, Seyed Mehdi Mousavi1, Mahdi Hajivaliei2, Ali Reza Hejabri Noubari1 1Department of Archaeology Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal Al-Ahmad Highway, Nasr Bridge, Tehran, Iran 2Physics Department, Bu-Ali Sina University, Mahdiyeh St., Hamedan, Iran *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract It has been proved that the basic changes in provide us with a general scheme of silver production post-Islam coin minting have been occurred in Ilkhanid era; technology. The silver extraction technology is divided into therefore a survey on the time coins may help us understand three periods: at first silver ore was used in this regard. Then the changes and econopolitical situation of the era. In this at the late 3rd millennium B.C the technology of Cerussite research, we have applied the non-destructive PIXE method mines application was used in the form of oxidized lead ores. to test 32 Ilkhanid coins belonging to various rulers. The The last period in Iran begins from the first millennium A.D. highest and the lowest silver percent’s in Damghan were when silver was extracted from Galena mines in the form of related to Ghazan, and Tegudar and Arghun, respectively. lead sulfide ores [9]. Regarding the conditions of the coins in Arghun era, we may The Islamic era has been studied in different places conclude that he had been engaged in the area's conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a Study of Their Relations, 1220-1335
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335. Lauren Prezbindowski University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Prezbindowski, Lauren, "The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335." (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1152. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1152 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Louisville December 2012 THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Approved on November 15,2012 By the following Thesis Committee: Dr. John McLeod, Thesis Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Paleologina and the Il-Khanate of Persia. a Byzantine Princess in an Empire Between Islam and Christendom
    MARIA PALEOLOGINA AND THE IL-KHANATE OF PERSIA. A BYZANTINE PRINCESS IN AN EMPIRE BETWEEN ISLAM AND CHRISTENDOM MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA SpaIN Date of receipt: 26th of January, 2016 Final date of acceptance: 12th of July, 2016 ABSTRACT In the 13th century Persia, dominated by the Mongols, a Byzantine princess, Maria Paleologina, stood out greatly in the court of Abaqa Khan, her husband. The Il-Khanate of Persia was then an empire precariously balanced between Islam, dominant in its territories and Christianity that was prevailing in its court and in the diplomatic relations. The role of Maria, a fervent Christian, was decisive in her husband’s policy and in that of any of his successors. Her figure deserves a detailed study and that is what we propose in this paper. KEYWORDS Maria Paleologina, Il-khanate of Persia, Abaqa, Michel VIII, Mongols. CapitaLIA VERBA Maria Paleologa, Ilkhanatus Persiae, Abaqa, Michael VIII, Mongoles. IMAGO TEMPORIS. MEDIUM AEVUM, XI (2017): 217-231 / ISSN 1888-3931 / DOI 10.21001/itma.2017.11.08 217 218 MARÍA ISABEL CABRERA RAMOS 1. Introduction The great expansion of Genghis Khan’s hordes to the west swept away the Islamic states and encouraged for a while the hopes of the Christian states of the East. The latter tried to ally themselves with the powerful Mongols and in this attempt they played the religion card.1 Although most of the Mongols who entered Persia, Iraq and Syria were shamanists, Nestorian Christianity exerted a strong influence among elites, especially in the court. That was why during some crucial decades for the history of the East, the Il-Khanate of Persia fluctuated between the consolidation of Christian influence and the approach to Islam, that despite the devastation brought by the Mongols in Persia,2 Iraq and Syria remained the dominant factor within the Il-khanate.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Double Rapprochement': Conversion to Islam Among the Mongol Elite During the Early Ilkhanate
    REFLECTIONS ON A 'DOUBLE RAPPROCHEMENT': CONVERSION TO ISLAM AMONG THE MONGOL ELITE DURING THE EARLY ILKHANATE JUDITH PFEIFFER Introductory Remarks The study of conversion to Islam among the Mongols has recently received a strong impetus through Devin DeWeese's seminal work on Baba Tiikles and the Islamization of the Golden Horde. 1 For the Ilkhanate, Charles Melville, 2 Reuven Amitai, 3 and Ciineyt Kanat4 have devoted articles to the Ilkhans Ghazan Khan's and Al).mad Teguder's conversions to Islam, and earlier scholarship, undertaken by Mu~tara Taha Badr in the l 950s5 and Fu'ad 'Abd al-Mu'tI al­ $ayyad6 and Mul).ammad Al).mad Mul).ammad7 in the 1970s and 1980s focused on these Ilkhans' conversions as well. Nonetheless, research on conversion to Islam among the Mongols of the Ilkhanate is still in its infancy. It is in this sense that the following thoughts are presented here, namely as a starting point, rather than a conclusive answer to a complex issue. When talking about conversion to Islam in the Ilkhanate we normally think of Ghazan Khan, his vizier Rashid al-Din, and the reforms implemented under their patronage. That there were earlier converts on the lower echelons of Mongol society is well known, and DeWeese's contribution to this volume provides further insightful examples. In this paper, I will focus on conversion to Islam among the Mongol elite in the early Ilkhanate, a period which for the pur­ poses of this paper shall be defined as the four decades between the 1 DeWeese (1994). 2 Melville (1990b), 159- 77.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilician Armenia in the Thirteenth Century.[3] Marco Polo, for Example, Set out on His Journey to China from Ayas in 1271
    The Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia (also known as Little Armenia; not to be confused with the Arme- nian Kingdom of Antiquity) was a state formed in the Middle Ages by Armenian refugees fleeing the Seljuk invasion of Armenia. It was located on the Gulf of Alexandretta of the Mediterranean Sea in what is today southern Turkey. The kingdom remained independent from around 1078 to 1375. The Kingdom of Cilicia was founded by the Rubenian dynasty, an offshoot of the larger Bagratid family that at various times held the thrones of Armenia and Georgia. Their capital was Sis. Cilicia was a strong ally of the European Crusaders, and saw itself as a bastion of Christendom in the East. It also served as a focus for Armenian nationalism and culture, since Armenia was under foreign oc- cupation at the time. King Levon I of Armenia helped cultivate Cilicia's economy and commerce as its interaction with European traders grew. Major cities and castles of the kingdom included the port of Korikos, Lam- pron, Partzerpert, Vahka (modern Feke), Hromkla, Tarsus, Anazarbe, Til Hamdoun, Mamistra (modern Misis: the classical Mopsuestia), Adana and the port of Ayas (Aias) which served as a Western terminal to the East. The Pisans, Genoese and Venetians established colonies in Ayas through treaties with Cilician Armenia in the thirteenth century.[3] Marco Polo, for example, set out on his journey to China from Ayas in 1271. For a short time in the 1st century BCE the powerful kingdom of Armenia was able to conquer a vast region in the Levant, including the area of Cilicia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mongols in Iran
    chapter 10 THE MONGOLS IN IRAN george e. lane Iran was dramatically brought into the Mongol sphere of infl uence toward the end of the second decade of the thirteenth century. As well as the initial traumatic mili- tary incursions, Iran also experienced the start of prolonged martial rule, followed later by the domination and rule of the Mongol Ilkhans. However, what began as a brutal and vindictive invasion and occupation developed into a benign and cultur- ally and economically fl ourishing period of unity and strength. The Mongol period in Iranian history provokes controversy and debate to this day. From the horrors of the initial bloody irruptions, when the fi rst Mongol-led armies rampaged across northern Iran, to the glory days of the Ilkhanate-Yuan axis, when the Mongol- dominated Persian and Chinese courts dazzled the world, the Mongol infl uence on Iran of this turbulent period was profound. The Mongols not only affected Iran and southwestern Asia but they also had a devastating effect on eastern Asia, Europe, and even North Africa. In many parts of the world, the Middle East, Europe, and the Americas in particular, the Mongols’ name has since become synonymous with murder, massacre, and marauding may- hem. They became known as Tatars or Tartars in Europe and Western Asia for two reasons. Firstly, until Genghis Khan destroyed their dominance, the Tatars were the largest and most powerful of the Turco-Mongol tribes. And secondly, in Latin Tartarus meant hell and these tribes were believed to have issued from the depths of Hades. Their advent has been portrayed as a bloody “bolt from the blue” that left a trail of destruction, death, and horrifi ed grief in its wake.
    [Show full text]