DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: CB-21-2021 Food/Beverage Stores and Gas Stations in the R-A Zone DATE: March 31, 2021 County Council Member Todd Turner has presented CB-21-2021, a legislative bill that seeks to permit a food and beverage store and gas station in the R-A (Residential Agriculture) Zone, under certain circumstances (copy attached). The legislation was requested by the owner of a vacant, three-acre property located in the median of Maryland Route 3, south of Maryland Route 450, across from Beall Funeral Home (see map below). MAYOR Timothy J. Adams MAYOR PRO TEM Adrian Boafo COUNCIL Michael P. Esteve • Henri Gardner • Ingrid S. Harrison • Roxy Ndebumadu • Dufour Woolfley CITY MANAGER Alfred D. Lott City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityofbowie.org 2 Memo to City Council re: CB-21-2021 CB-21-2021 will revise the Permitted Uses in the R-A (Residential Agriculture) Zone to allow a food and beverage store with a gas station, which would be regulated as if the property were zoned C-M (Commercial Miscellaneous), subject to approval of a Detailed Site Plan. This legislation, which has already been presented at a County Council meeting, is awaiting review by the Council’s Committee of the Whole at an upcoming meeting. The property intended to benefit from this zoning text amendment is not within the City limits, which are close by at Whitemarsh Park, about 900 feet to the south. As stated by the proponent’s attorney, there is currently strong interest in this property from commercial developers. Analysis There are reasons for the City to be concerned about CB-21-2021. In this instance, the zoning text amendment process is clearly an end run around any other process that might rezone the property, such as a piecemeal rezoning, a rezoning through the Countywide Map Amendment (CMA) or a Sectional Map Amendment following approval of the Bowie-Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan. For decades, the City has opposed development, especially traffic generating development, in the US 301/MD 3 median. The proponent’s attorney points out that the legislation is needed now, because the future of CMA approval is uncertain, and they believe that there will not be a Sectional Map Amendment (SMA) following approval of the Bowie Master Plan. The proponent’s attorney explained that they tried to limit the bill from applying to all median properties in the R-A zone by excluding property that is not within 2,500 feet of an existing major intersection or planned interchange. Staff believes this legislation is unnecessary and very untimely, especially given the timelines for CMA completion and approval of a new Master Plan for Bowie-Mitchellville and Vicinity. We understand that the Maryland General Assembly is likely to approve legislation this session that will allow the CMA to move toward final approval. Additionally, M-NCPPC staff advised us this week that, although the Bowie-Mitchellville and Vicinity Master Plan does not have a concurrent SMA, the intent to follow the Master Plan approval with a new SMA has always been their intent. The Preliminary Area Master Plan is due to be published this summer. There are multiple City development policies contained in the Development Review Guidelines and Policies document recently approved by City Council on March 1st that apply directly to this effort to amend the County Zoning Ordinance. Land Use US 301/MD 3 Median • Existing properties in the MD 3/US 301 median shall be retained in the R-R zone. Expansion of existing commercial uses shall be discouraged, as they will further contribute to an already over-burdened transportation system and create the potential for increased vehicular conflicts. Any future commercial rezoning of residential properties to commercial zones is discouraged. • The consolidation of existing commercial properties in the MD 3/US 301 median shall be encouraged to provide more coordinated and attractive development. • Any improvement to median properties shall include adequate turning lanes and acceleration/deceleration lanes. Rural and Agricultural Areas Development of properties in the Rural and Agricultural Areas shall address the following: • protection of agricultural uses; • minimization of lot coverage and building bulk to avoid overly imposing new structures; 3 Memo to City Council re: CB-21-2021 • the use of conservation and wildlife habitat landscaping and avoidance of non-native plants; • preservation or creation of meadows and woodlands; • restrictions in sizes of lawns around all structures; and • use of aesthetically pleasing vinyl and aluminum siding. Economic Prosperity Strip commercial development, particularly single-use or pad site configuration, shall be discouraged. Commercial development shall be located in planned or designated centers rather than on isolated, scattered sites. Transportation and Mobility MD 3 Policy The City supports a completely grade separated interchange (Option A) at the intersection of MD Route 450 and MD Route 3 to encourage drivers destined for points west of Bowie to use US Route 50 as opposed to MD Route 450. Regarding the upgrading of MD Route 3, the City supports the Boulevard Concept (Alternate #3) with the following modifications: • Eliminate proposed right-in, right-out at Columbian Way. • Eliminate proposed cul-de-sac from Sylvan Drive to median residence. • Lower roadbed for upgraded MD Route 3 between existing Columbian Way connection points. • Connect Columbian Way to Forest Drive using bridge over MD 3. • Construct half diamond for access to MD Route 3 on the south side of Columbian Way/Forest Drive bridge. • Install 2-way stop on service road at Forest Drive and install stop signs at Sylvan Drive and Whitemarsh Park. • The grade-separated interchange shall also accommodate east/west and north/south bicycle traffic through the interchange. Natural Environment The Patuxent River is recognized as being a valuable environmental resource within close proximity to the City of Bowie. This resource has a rich heritage dating back to pre-historic and Colonial times and is worthy of protection efforts from local government, residents and the business community. The network of environmental assets related to the Patuxent ecosystem includes “Sensitive Areas”, such as 100-year floodplain, wetlands, steep slopes, and other natural characteristics. In addition, the Countywide Growth Management Policy in Plan Prince George’s 2035 identifies the benefitting property as lying within the Rural and Agricultural Area, where new development is discouraged. The General Plan, on page 106, defines Rural and Agricultural Areas as “areas with significant natural and agricultural resources that are best suited for low-density residential development on well and septic, agricultural activity, and forest preservation.” Staff believes that development of the above-mentioned property with commercial uses, at this time, would not be consistent with the current City and County development policies set forth above. An approved concept plan exists for the grade separation of MD 450/MD 3 intersection and construction of an interchange and service road system at that location. However, there is no funding for design or construction of this improvement in the current Maryland Department of Transportation’s Consolidated Transportation Program. The conceptual design for the interchange is depicted below. The construction of the interchange will occur just north of the referenced three-acre property and, upon its completion, the current southbound lanes of MD 3 will become a two-way service road. The parcel is likely to be impacted by SHA right-of-way acquisition for lane widening on the northbound lanes of MD 3 and construction of the service road along the current southbound lanes. Given the uncertainty of State funding for the interchange and its construction timetable, staff believes it would be premature to convert 4 Memo to City Council re: CB-21-2021 this parcel to commercial use. Staff recommends retaining it in rural and agricultural uses as allowed under the current R-A zoning. Recommendation Staff recommends Council OPPOSE CB-21-2021 because the proposed legislation, with respect to the three-acre parcel in the median of MD 3, south of MD 450: • is not consistent with current City and County land use policies; • interferes with the process now underway to update the Bowie- Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan and the planning area’s zoning pattern; and, • is premature in relation to plans for construction of a new interchange at MD 450/MD 3 and its related service road system. It is further recommended that the attached letter be sent to the Prince George’s County Council. Attachments City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 D R A F T April 6, 2021 The Honorable Calvin S. Hawkins, II, Chair Committee of the Whole Prince George’s County Council County Administration Building 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 RE: CB-21-2021 (R-A Zone) Dear Chair Hawkins: On April 5, 2021 the Bowie City Council reviewed CB-21-2021, which will permit food and beverage stores and gas stations in the R-A (Residential Agriculture) Zone, under certain circumstances. The legislation was requested by the owner of a vacant, three-acre property located in the median of Maryland Route 3, south of Maryland Route 450, across from Beall Funeral Home. The property intended to benefit from this zoning text amendment is not within the City limits, which are close by at Whitemarsh Park, about 900 feet to the south. As the City understands it, there is currently strong interest in this property from commercial developers. The City Council believes this legislation is unnecessary and very untimely, especially given the timelines for CMA completion and approval of a new Master Plan for Bowie-Mitchellville and Vicinity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Preservation Commission
    DATE: September 9, 2019 TO: Historic Preservation Commission VIA: Howard S. Berger, Supervisor Historic Preservation Section, Countywide Planning Division FROM: Thomas W. Gross, Planner Coordinator Historic Preservation Section, Countywide Planning Division RE: Evaluation for Historic Site Designation: Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation Historic Resource Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railway Bridge MIHP Number 71A-006 Address 8200 bl. Laurel Bowie Road, Bowie, MD 20715 Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Owners (Parcel 14); Adrian J. Rad and Aviva S. Nebesky (Parcel 1) Parcel 1 and that portion of Parcel 14 bounded on the east by Laurel Bowie Road and on the west by a line drawn from the Environmental Setting southernmost point of the western portion of Parcel 1 to the westernmost point of the eastern portion of Parcel 1 Description Map 29, Grid E3, Parcel 14 and Map 29, Grid D3, Parcel 1 Procedural Background September 1974 Survey and documentation of the property initially completed by Michael F. Dwyer. July 1981 Resource included in the Prince George’s County Historic Sites and Districts Plan. September 1985 Survey and documentation updated by Susan G. Pearl January 2008 Survey and documentation updated by EHT Traceries, Inc. August 29, 2019 The property was posted “at least 14 days in advance,” according to the provisions of the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Ordinance (Subtitle 29-118) and the Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance (Subtitle 27-125.03). Evidence of sign posting and written notice to the property owner are attached. August 30, 2019 The property owner, the adjacent property owners, and other interested parties were mailed written notice of the time, date, and location of the public hearing on the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Crownsville Small Area Plan
    Crownsville Small Area Plan Adopted May 15, 2000 by Council Bill 22-00 County Executive Janet Owens County Council Daniel E. Klosterman, Chair A. Shirley Murphy, Vice Chair Pamela Beidle Bill D. Burlison John J. Klocko, III Barbara D. Samorajczyk Cathleen M. Vitale Crownsville Small Area Plan Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................... 1 Vision...............................................................................................5 Concept Plan ....................................................................................6 Plan Highlights .............................................................................. 10 Community History .................................................................... 13 Demographics................................................................................ 16 Economic Development. ................................................................ 17 Land Use and Zoning .....................................................................23 Natural and Historic Resources ......................................................39 Transportation................................................................................45 Public Utilities ...............................................................................52 Community Facilities ....................................................................55 Community Design ........................................................................61 Glossary.........................................................................................73
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland
    1 Patterson Par!, & M-.-^v DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 HO 1989 36 I •• » I. .' - -!>t£: V) f "')•'•:>","'I :i".- ':Ti t.r L-rn Frontispiece: Painting of the mill at Simpsonville as it appeared in the early 20th century. The artist painted the mill while recuperating from an automobile accident near Simpsonville. The original of this painting and the one in Figure 12 are in the possession of Walter Iglehart, whose father operated the mill in the early 20th century. Photograph courtesy of Lee Preston. -u - Ho DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES £ . 1 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 1989 Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland by Richard G. Ervin Division of Archeology Maryland Geological Survey ABSTRACT Archeologists surveyed five proposed alignments of Maryland Route 32 between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, finding three archeological sites in the project area. The Spring Hill site (18HO148) is a possible late 19th century rural residential structure location. The site is outside the proposed Alternate B right-of-way, and it is recommended that it be avoided during construction.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER NO. 975 Petition of B. Michael Roll, ) Docket No. 202 Mayor
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 975 IN THE MATTER OF: Served S eptember _:11, 1969 Petition of B. Michael Roll, ) Docket No. 202 Mayor, City of District Heights, ) Prince George ' s County , Maryland ) to Terminate WMA Transit Company ) Routes B and V at Kipling Parkway ) and Marbury Drive. Order No. 674 of this Commission, effective February 13, 1967, authorized WMA Transit Company (WMA) to extend, in District Heights , Maryland, Routes B and V: From junction of Mason Street and Kipling Parkway, orvr Xipl hg Parkway , Glendora Dfl1e- Kipling Parkway to Mason Street and return over . the same routs. Petitioner , in his official capacity, submitted Informal Complaint No. 1937 on June 5, 1969 , claiming that Glendora Drive is too narrow to accommodate bus traffic. A public hearing was held on July 1, 1969. The petitioner stated that although there had been no objection to the original institution of the Glendora Drive extension , soon after operation commenced both his office and the police department received complaints concerning it. Testimony was adduced from a member of the District Heights Police Department that at times buses are unable to proceed around a particular turn on Glendora Drive and the police have had to tow legally parked cars to enable the bus to proceed. The Commission staff studied the route in question. The staff found that the northwestern corner of Glendora Drive is too narrow for buses to pass when cars are parked on both sides of the street . It also determined that beyond the junction of Kipling Street and Marbury Drive there are no streets on which a loop or turn -around could be made by a full-size bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Review Policies Draft.Pdf
    City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Development Review Policies DATE: January 14, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ The current Development Review Guidelines and Policies document was approved by City Council on November 6, 2017 via Resolution R-65-17. City Council agreed to have City staff update the policies to assist the City’s review of the Bowie, Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan, which is now being prepared and will be released this summer. Staff conducted three public review sessions with City Council on September 8, September 21 and November 2, 2020. An updated “Draft for Public Comment” version, as well as a Track Changes version of the revised policies, were posted on the City website. No comments were received prior to the December 31st deadline; however, staff received informal positive feedback regarding the proposed revisions from Environmental Advisory Committee members and the Multimodal and Public Spaces (MAPS) subgroup of the Bowie Green Team. On January 13th, the City’s Planning Director gave a presentation on the changes to the Economic Development Committee. A City Council public hearing is scheduled for Monday night. At the meeting, the Planning Director will review the staff recommended changes to the policy elements, which include: Land Use; Economic Prosperity; Transportation; the Environment; Housing and Neighborhoods; Community Heritage, Culture and Design; and, Public Facilities. The recommended Council policies are attached. Specific revisions requested by Council are addressed by staff, as follows: 1. Downzone all the Jesuit Property, take it out of the Established Community and put it into the Rural Area.
    [Show full text]
  • State Highway Administration Maryland Department of Transportation
    \, \s\ State Highway Administration Maryland Department of Transportation Karl L Hess Highway Information Services Division 707 North Calvert Street, Baitmre, MD 21202 410-333-1310 IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! FOR- A.M. DATE. TIME .P.M. WHILE YOU WERE OUT M OQ^ OF. ,' PHONE NO. J\ TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WfLL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH RETURNED YOUR CALL MESSAGE. / X SIGNED. J L1-A2334 PRINTED IN US A The Howard County Times 6-17-93 Route 94 gets a name change Betsy Stfeff in the county's Bureau of Communica-; A road by any other name ... tions. The fire was actually on Route) may not cause as many prob- 94 just two miles from the station, butj lems. the fire engines were dispatched to the! After a near disaster last April, it other Florence Road, passing the actual looks like Route 94 in western Howard site on the way. : County is going to get a name change. "It was almost 30 minutes before the'' If the county Planning Board approves, engines got to the right location,"t the rural highway will be renamed Jordan said. "Thankfully, the situation Woodbine Road from Route 26 in turned out to be minor, but it could' 5 Carroll County all the way to the have been serious." si, Montgomery County line. In May, Jordan wrote a letter'to the The problem is not that the road State Highway Administration, which •1 currently changes names three times in agreed to support the name change: Howard County — from Woodbine to The county's Fire Prevention Bureau ii Florence to Ellicott Road — but that also lobbying for the change.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes From
    News and Notes from THE PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY January 1979 Vol. VII, No. 1. The Meeting Schedule There will be no meetings of the Society in January or February. The regular meeting schedule will be resumed in March. Nominations for St. George's Day Awards Each year at the annual St. George's Day Dinner the Society presents the St. George's Day awards to individuals and organizations who have made significant contributions to the preservation of cur county's heritage. Since the awards program was initiated in 1974, 39 awards have been presented. We now solicit nominations from the membership for the 1979 awards. Please contact any officer of the Society with your nomination, or write to Paul Lanham, Awards chairman, 3115 Holland Cliff Road, Huntingtown, Maryland 20639. Deadline for nominations is March 1. Note of Thanks The officers of the Prince George's County Historical Society, on behalf of all those who attended, wish to thank the many members and friends who assisted at the annual Christmas Party, and those who brought foods. We would also like to recognize the following persons who spent a great deal -f time, both before and after the event, helping: Joan Speicher, Forrest Bowie, Margaret Fisher, Edith Bagot, Herb Embrey Ted Bissell, Alan Virta, Louise Tatspaugh, Carl Flynn, and Helen Reed. Historical Markers Report Bill Aleshire, a member of the Society's Historical Markers Committee, reports that a dedication ceremony was held on November 4, for the historical marker at Sacred Heart Chapel, one of the cradles of American Catholicism.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Review Policies.Pdf
    City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Development Review Policies DATE: February 11, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ On February 1st, City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed revision to the current Development Review Guidelines and Policies document. After hearing testimony from six interested parties, Council directed staff to make further revisions and return the document for further consideration by Council. The additional revisions requested by City Council are shown in Track Changes on the attached draft, identified as “Draft With February 1 City Council Revisions”. Upon approval by Council, a Resolution will be prepared endorsing the revised policies for final action on an upcoming Consent Agenda. In addition, staff previously provided a draft letter to the Maryland State Highway Administration asking for a re-examination of the road improvement plans for Maryland Route 450 in the Bowie Mainstreet area. The letter was not discussed at the February 1st City Council meeting. A copy of the proposed letter is attached for your review and concurrence. Recommendation Staff recommends Council APPROVE the attached Development Review Policies revision identified as “Draft With February 1 City Council Revisions" and further recommends that Council approve the attached draft letter to State Highway Administrator Tim Smith. Attachments MAYOR Timothy J. Adams MAYOR PRO TEM Adrian Boafo COUNCIL Michael P. Esteve • Henri Gardner • Ingrid S. Harrison • Roxy Ndebumadu • Dufour Woolfley CITY MANAGER Alfred D. Lott City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityofbowie.org Bowie Mainstreet Draft Letter to SHA D R A F T February _____, 2021 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised March 22, 2010
    Revised March 22, 2010 CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS Table of Contents Definitions Page 1 PERMITS AVAILABLE Page 2 TYPES OF PERMITS Page 2 BLANKET PERMIT Page 3 BOOK PERMIT Page 5 CONTAINERIZED CARGO PERMIT Page 7 SPECIAL HAULING PERMIT Page 7 SPECIAL VEHICLE PERMIT Page 9 FEES Page 10 DENIAL OF PERMIT – Conditions Page 13 SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF PERMIT Page 14 FALSE STATEMENT IN APPLICATIONS Page 16 EXCEPTIONAL HAULING PERMIT Page 16 GENERAL CONDITIONS Page 17 DEFINTIONS Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS Page 19 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS Page 19 COMBINATION OF VEHICLES Page 21 SELF-PROPELLED VEHICLES Page 23 COSTS AND DAMAGES Page 25 SAFETY Page 25 LIMITATIONS Page 28 MOVEMENT ON TOLL FACILITIES PROPERTY Page 29 HOURS OF MOVEMENT – GENERAL Page 30 EMERGENCY MOVEMENT Page 31 CONTINUOUS TRAVEL Page 33 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Page 36 DEFINITIONS Page 36 VEHICLES OVER 45 TONS, OVER 60 TONS, Page 37 OVER 250 TONS STEEL RIMMED EQUIPMENT Page 38 ii TMS 9/9/10 ESCORT VEHICLES Page 39 SIGNING Page 39 ESCORTS – IN GENERAL Page 40 PRIVATE ESCORT – WHEN REQUIRED Page 40 PRIVATE ESCORT – EQUIPMENT AND Page 41 RESPONSIBILITIES ESCORTED VEHICLES – GENERAL Page 42 RESTRICTIONS POLICE ESCORT Page 43 CONTAINERIZED CARGO PERMITS Page 44 DEFINITIONS Page 44 PERMITS AVAILABLE Page 44 INDIVISIBLE LOAD DETERMINATION Page 45 ROUTES OF TRAVEL Page 45 AUTHORITY TO ISSUE PERMITS Page 55 PROCEDURES Page 55 FEES Page 55 DENIAL OF PERMIT Page 56 MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS Page 56 SUSPENSIONS Page 57 FALSE STATEMENT Page 58 COSTS AND DAMAGES Page 59 DIVISION OF BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT (SHA) WEIGHT, Page 60 AXLE CHARTS iii TMS 9/9/10 Title 11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Subtitle 04 STATE HIGHWAYADMINISTRATION Chapter 01 Permits for Oversize and Overweight Vehicles Authority: Transportation Article, §§-103(b), 4-204, 4-205(f), 8-204(b)—(d), (i), 24-112, 24-113; Article 88B, §§1, 3, 14; Annotated Code of Maryland 11.04.01.01 .01 Definitions A.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Information
    Medical Information 2016 Navy Camp Highlights 2016 Navy Swimming Camps Swimming Camps Applicant’s Name (Please print) 2016 Stroke Camp • Educational presentations each evening June 14-18, 2016 and/or • Video analysis of all four competitive strokes Medical Treatment Authorization I/We being the legal guardians of the above applicant autho- June 20-24, 2016 • Individual and group instruction rize the Naval Academy Athletic Association, the specific Each camp week ends at 12 noon. • Boat cruise of Annapolis Harbor & Severn River camp and its agents, permission to request medical treat- Clinics: June 18 & 19, 2016 ment as necessary to insure the well being of the applicant. • Enthusiastic & experienced camp staff (Parent or Guardian Signature) (Date) Navy Swimming Camp is a stroke intensive camp. It Insurance is designed to help a swimmer improve in each of the Traveling to Annapolis Coverage for accidental injury is required by all participants. Please complete the health care information below. four individual strokes including starts and turns. One From The North Take Interstate 95 South, exit on Interstate 695 East in Health Insurance Carrier: stroke will be highlighted each day, with a day reserved Baltimore, then take Interstate 97 South exit. Follow Interstate 97 until it merges into U.S. Route 50 East. for starts and turns. Training will occur in each Policy Number: From The South session, with swimmers receiving individual attention. Take Interstate 95 North, Maryland Route 2 North, and U.S. I approve of my child’s attendance at the Naval Academy Route 301/Maryland Route 3 North Intersect U.S. Route 50.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan
    Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Adopted March 17, 2003 By County Council Bill No. 83-02 County Executive Janet Owens County Council Cathleen M. Vitale, Chair Edward Middlebrooks, Vice Chair Pamela G. Beidle Bill D. Burlison Ronald C. Dillon, Jr. Edward R. Reilly Barbara D. Samorajczyk Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................ 1 Community History and Character............................................................... 5 Demographics............................................................................................. 14 Vision......................................................................................................... 17 Plan Concept............................................................................................... 18 Summary of Key Recommendations........................................................... 24 Regional Planning and Inter-jurisdictional Cooperation.............................. 28 Natural and Historic Resources .................................................................... 30 Land Use and Zoning.................................................................................. 63 Transportation.............................................................................................. 99 Utilities..... ..... ... .... ... ... ...... ..... ....... ... ... ..... ... ... ................. ....... ....... ........ ........ 121 Community Facilities
    [Show full text]