DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Review Policies.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Review Policies.Pdf City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Development Review Policies DATE: February 11, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ On February 1st, City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed revision to the current Development Review Guidelines and Policies document. After hearing testimony from six interested parties, Council directed staff to make further revisions and return the document for further consideration by Council. The additional revisions requested by City Council are shown in Track Changes on the attached draft, identified as “Draft With February 1 City Council Revisions”. Upon approval by Council, a Resolution will be prepared endorsing the revised policies for final action on an upcoming Consent Agenda. In addition, staff previously provided a draft letter to the Maryland State Highway Administration asking for a re-examination of the road improvement plans for Maryland Route 450 in the Bowie Mainstreet area. The letter was not discussed at the February 1st City Council meeting. A copy of the proposed letter is attached for your review and concurrence. Recommendation Staff recommends Council APPROVE the attached Development Review Policies revision identified as “Draft With February 1 City Council Revisions" and further recommends that Council approve the attached draft letter to State Highway Administrator Tim Smith. Attachments MAYOR Timothy J. Adams MAYOR PRO TEM Adrian Boafo COUNCIL Michael P. Esteve • Henri Gardner • Ingrid S. Harrison • Roxy Ndebumadu • Dufour Woolfley CITY MANAGER Alfred D. Lott City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityofbowie.org Bowie Mainstreet Draft Letter to SHA D R A F T February _____, 2021 Mr. Tim Smith, Administrator Mail Stop C-400 MDOT State Highway Administration P.O. Box 717 Baltimore MD 21203-0717 RE: Maryland Route 450 Design and Engineering Plans Dear Administrator Smith: The Bowie City Council respectfully requests your agency’s reexamination of the pending design and engineering plans for the “Bowie Mainstreet” portion of MD 450, located between Stonybrook Drive and Race Track Road. This request is made with the knowledge that “state-of-the-art” design techniques and roadway design practices relating to commercial business districts have evolved over the years since the project design was finalized, and because the City constantly receives negative feedback from residents and users of Bowie Mainstreet who continue to face the multi-modal challenges of a substandard roadway. A design that creates a true main street character for this segment of MD 450 would address many of these issues, assist in future community development and encourage redevelopment of the existing commercial centers located adjacent to it. By way of background, in 2005, design and engineering plans were created for the Bowie Mainstreet segment, which is the last piece of a massive reconstruction project involving the entire length of MD 450, from the Capital Beltway to MD 3. At that time, a thorough public review process was undertaken with City business owners and residents, and a final plan was endorsed by the City Council and accepted by SHA. However, the current FY 2021-2026 Consolidated Transportation Program (Prince George’s County, Line 29) identifies the status of the project as “Project on hold”. The project was 85- 90% complete when it was put on hold about a decade ago, due to funding constraints. The latest CTP projects that traffic volume in this portion of MD 450 will grow by 10% by 2040. The City Council would appreciate your re-examination of the roadway design concept for Bowie Mainstreet at the earliest opportunity. The City believes two guidance documents published by SHA are applicable here: When Main Street Is A State Highway and Context Driven: Access and Mobility for All Users 1.0. The City is very interested in working with you to advance the principles espoused by MDOT Secretary Gregory Slater in his recent presentations regarding Context Driven: Access and Mobility for All Users 1.0. The City feels the Bowie Mainstreet setting, with its origins as the center of commerce and social activity for the original Levitt-built subdivisions constructed in the 1960s, represents a unique combination of Urban Center, Traditional Town Center and Suburban Activity Center characteristics. This area would greatly benefit from an expert review of the conditions and an evaluation of context driven opportunities for future implementation when the MD 450 project is constructed. Such 2 Letter to SHA Administrator Tim Smith recommendations may possibly alter (and improve upon) the physical design shown in the current design and engineering plans. The City Council looks forward to your cooperation in the effort to address the needs of this extremely important location in our community. If you should have any questions regarding the City’s request, please contact Mr. Joe Meinert, Director of Planning and Community Development, at 301-809- 3045 or [email protected]. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Bowie City Council Timothy J. Adams Mayor cc: The Honorable Gregory Slater, MDOT Secretary The Honorable Douglas J.J. Peters, State Senator The Honorable Marvin E. Holmes, Delegate The Honorable Geraldine Valentino-Smith, Delegate The Honorable Ronald L. Watson, Delegate The Honorable Todd M. Turner, County Council Chair Ms. Erica Rigby, SHA District Engineer Mr. Terry Bellamy, Director of Prince George’s County DPW&T Mr. David Rogers, SHA Regional Planner for Prince George’s County Development Review Guidelines and Policies Standards for Creating a Quality Living Environment DRAFT WITH FEBRUARY 1 CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS Prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development Approved and Adopted by City Council on _________, 2021 Resolution R-____- 21 Draft With Feb 1 City Council Revisions 2 Draft With Feb 1 City Council Revisions Table of Contents Introduction.…..........................................................................................……………………………3 I. PART ONE – CITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS City Development Review Process………………………………………………….5 II. PART TWO – CITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW GUIDELINES A. Design Guidelines…………………………………………………..............……….8 B. Environmental and Open Space Guidelines………………………………………...10 C. Transportation Guidelines…………………………………………………………..11 III. PART THREE – CITY DEVELOPMENT POLICIES A. Land Use…………………………………………………………………………….13 B. Economic Prosperity………………………………………………………………...16 C. Transportation and Mobility…………………………………………………………17 D. Natural Environment…………………………………………………………………21 E. Housing and Neighborhoods…………………………………………………………23 F. Community Heritage, Culture and Design…………………………………………...24 G. Public Facilities………………………………………………………………………26 IV. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS FLOW CHARTS 3 Draft With Feb 1 City Council Revisions Introduction The City of Bowie does not control major land use, zoning, subdivision, or site plan decisions within its municipal boundaries, as this authority is given to Prince George’s County under the State of Maryland’s Regional District Act. A Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC), the agency that administers planning and zoning regulations in Prince George’s County, gives the City the right to review, comment and provide recommendations on all major development applications within the City limits, as well as the areas within one mile of the City limits. The City does, however, have authority to review and act on departures and variances from the Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance for projects within the City limits, under certain circumstances. The Prince George’s County Council granted this authority to the City in October 1998. In addition, the County Council granted they City the authority to review and decide certain types of alternative compliance applications involving the County Landscape Manual, certification of nonconforming uses and revisions to special exception site plans. This authority was granted in 2011. Since the 1980s, the rapid growth of the Bowie area, an outdated Master Plan (1970), and the City Council’s limited ability to regulate development activity through planning and zoning powers of its own gave rise to the need for development policies to guide growth within and around the City. The original Bowie Development Policies document (1989) was formulated after many hours of deliberation and Council consideration of direct input from area residents, and was used as the framework for the City’s position in the updating of the Bowie-Collington- Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan in 1991. Since that time, the guidelines have been updated several times, with the last formal update occurring in January, 2005. The major goal of the Bowie Development Review Guidelines and Policies is to encourage and promote a carefully planned community and sensitively designed development sites. Bowie’s Development Review Guidelines and Policies are intended to: - encourage an equitable distribution of well-designed and efficient land development which reflects appropriate relationships between uses, continuity between neighborhoods, availability of public facilities, and a sensitivity to the natural environment; - enhance the natural environment and provide guidance for site development within, and immediately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Preservation Commission
    DATE: September 9, 2019 TO: Historic Preservation Commission VIA: Howard S. Berger, Supervisor Historic Preservation Section, Countywide Planning Division FROM: Thomas W. Gross, Planner Coordinator Historic Preservation Section, Countywide Planning Division RE: Evaluation for Historic Site Designation: Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation Historic Resource Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railway Bridge MIHP Number 71A-006 Address 8200 bl. Laurel Bowie Road, Bowie, MD 20715 Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Owners (Parcel 14); Adrian J. Rad and Aviva S. Nebesky (Parcel 1) Parcel 1 and that portion of Parcel 14 bounded on the east by Laurel Bowie Road and on the west by a line drawn from the Environmental Setting southernmost point of the western portion of Parcel 1 to the westernmost point of the eastern portion of Parcel 1 Description Map 29, Grid E3, Parcel 14 and Map 29, Grid D3, Parcel 1 Procedural Background September 1974 Survey and documentation of the property initially completed by Michael F. Dwyer. July 1981 Resource included in the Prince George’s County Historic Sites and Districts Plan. September 1985 Survey and documentation updated by Susan G. Pearl January 2008 Survey and documentation updated by EHT Traceries, Inc. August 29, 2019 The property was posted “at least 14 days in advance,” according to the provisions of the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Ordinance (Subtitle 29-118) and the Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance (Subtitle 27-125.03). Evidence of sign posting and written notice to the property owner are attached. August 30, 2019 The property owner, the adjacent property owners, and other interested parties were mailed written notice of the time, date, and location of the public hearing on the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Crownsville Small Area Plan
    Crownsville Small Area Plan Adopted May 15, 2000 by Council Bill 22-00 County Executive Janet Owens County Council Daniel E. Klosterman, Chair A. Shirley Murphy, Vice Chair Pamela Beidle Bill D. Burlison John J. Klocko, III Barbara D. Samorajczyk Cathleen M. Vitale Crownsville Small Area Plan Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................... 1 Vision...............................................................................................5 Concept Plan ....................................................................................6 Plan Highlights .............................................................................. 10 Community History .................................................................... 13 Demographics................................................................................ 16 Economic Development. ................................................................ 17 Land Use and Zoning .....................................................................23 Natural and Historic Resources ......................................................39 Transportation................................................................................45 Public Utilities ...............................................................................52 Community Facilities ....................................................................55 Community Design ........................................................................61 Glossary.........................................................................................73
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER NO. 975 Petition of B. Michael Roll, ) Docket No. 202 Mayor
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 975 IN THE MATTER OF: Served S eptember _:11, 1969 Petition of B. Michael Roll, ) Docket No. 202 Mayor, City of District Heights, ) Prince George ' s County , Maryland ) to Terminate WMA Transit Company ) Routes B and V at Kipling Parkway ) and Marbury Drive. Order No. 674 of this Commission, effective February 13, 1967, authorized WMA Transit Company (WMA) to extend, in District Heights , Maryland, Routes B and V: From junction of Mason Street and Kipling Parkway, orvr Xipl hg Parkway , Glendora Dfl1e- Kipling Parkway to Mason Street and return over . the same routs. Petitioner , in his official capacity, submitted Informal Complaint No. 1937 on June 5, 1969 , claiming that Glendora Drive is too narrow to accommodate bus traffic. A public hearing was held on July 1, 1969. The petitioner stated that although there had been no objection to the original institution of the Glendora Drive extension , soon after operation commenced both his office and the police department received complaints concerning it. Testimony was adduced from a member of the District Heights Police Department that at times buses are unable to proceed around a particular turn on Glendora Drive and the police have had to tow legally parked cars to enable the bus to proceed. The Commission staff studied the route in question. The staff found that the northwestern corner of Glendora Drive is too narrow for buses to pass when cars are parked on both sides of the street . It also determined that beyond the junction of Kipling Street and Marbury Drive there are no streets on which a loop or turn -around could be made by a full-size bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Review Policies Draft.Pdf
    City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Development Review Policies DATE: January 14, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ The current Development Review Guidelines and Policies document was approved by City Council on November 6, 2017 via Resolution R-65-17. City Council agreed to have City staff update the policies to assist the City’s review of the Bowie, Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan, which is now being prepared and will be released this summer. Staff conducted three public review sessions with City Council on September 8, September 21 and November 2, 2020. An updated “Draft for Public Comment” version, as well as a Track Changes version of the revised policies, were posted on the City website. No comments were received prior to the December 31st deadline; however, staff received informal positive feedback regarding the proposed revisions from Environmental Advisory Committee members and the Multimodal and Public Spaces (MAPS) subgroup of the Bowie Green Team. On January 13th, the City’s Planning Director gave a presentation on the changes to the Economic Development Committee. A City Council public hearing is scheduled for Monday night. At the meeting, the Planning Director will review the staff recommended changes to the policy elements, which include: Land Use; Economic Prosperity; Transportation; the Environment; Housing and Neighborhoods; Community Heritage, Culture and Design; and, Public Facilities. The recommended Council policies are attached. Specific revisions requested by Council are addressed by staff, as follows: 1. Downzone all the Jesuit Property, take it out of the Established Community and put it into the Rural Area.
    [Show full text]
  • State Highway Administration Maryland Department of Transportation
    \, \s\ State Highway Administration Maryland Department of Transportation Karl L Hess Highway Information Services Division 707 North Calvert Street, Baitmre, MD 21202 410-333-1310 IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! FOR- A.M. DATE. TIME .P.M. WHILE YOU WERE OUT M OQ^ OF. ,' PHONE NO. J\ TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WfLL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH RETURNED YOUR CALL MESSAGE. / X SIGNED. J L1-A2334 PRINTED IN US A The Howard County Times 6-17-93 Route 94 gets a name change Betsy Stfeff in the county's Bureau of Communica-; A road by any other name ... tions. The fire was actually on Route) may not cause as many prob- 94 just two miles from the station, butj lems. the fire engines were dispatched to the! After a near disaster last April, it other Florence Road, passing the actual looks like Route 94 in western Howard site on the way. : County is going to get a name change. "It was almost 30 minutes before the'' If the county Planning Board approves, engines got to the right location,"t the rural highway will be renamed Jordan said. "Thankfully, the situation Woodbine Road from Route 26 in turned out to be minor, but it could' 5 Carroll County all the way to the have been serious." si, Montgomery County line. In May, Jordan wrote a letter'to the The problem is not that the road State Highway Administration, which •1 currently changes names three times in agreed to support the name change: Howard County — from Woodbine to The county's Fire Prevention Bureau ii Florence to Ellicott Road — but that also lobbying for the change.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes From
    News and Notes from THE PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY January 1979 Vol. VII, No. 1. The Meeting Schedule There will be no meetings of the Society in January or February. The regular meeting schedule will be resumed in March. Nominations for St. George's Day Awards Each year at the annual St. George's Day Dinner the Society presents the St. George's Day awards to individuals and organizations who have made significant contributions to the preservation of cur county's heritage. Since the awards program was initiated in 1974, 39 awards have been presented. We now solicit nominations from the membership for the 1979 awards. Please contact any officer of the Society with your nomination, or write to Paul Lanham, Awards chairman, 3115 Holland Cliff Road, Huntingtown, Maryland 20639. Deadline for nominations is March 1. Note of Thanks The officers of the Prince George's County Historical Society, on behalf of all those who attended, wish to thank the many members and friends who assisted at the annual Christmas Party, and those who brought foods. We would also like to recognize the following persons who spent a great deal -f time, both before and after the event, helping: Joan Speicher, Forrest Bowie, Margaret Fisher, Edith Bagot, Herb Embrey Ted Bissell, Alan Virta, Louise Tatspaugh, Carl Flynn, and Helen Reed. Historical Markers Report Bill Aleshire, a member of the Society's Historical Markers Committee, reports that a dedication ceremony was held on November 4, for the historical marker at Sacred Heart Chapel, one of the cradles of American Catholicism.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan
    Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Adopted March 17, 2003 By County Council Bill No. 83-02 County Executive Janet Owens County Council Cathleen M. Vitale, Chair Edward Middlebrooks, Vice Chair Pamela G. Beidle Bill D. Burlison Ronald C. Dillon, Jr. Edward R. Reilly Barbara D. Samorajczyk Annapolis Neck Small Area Plan Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................ 1 Community History and Character............................................................... 5 Demographics............................................................................................. 14 Vision......................................................................................................... 17 Plan Concept............................................................................................... 18 Summary of Key Recommendations........................................................... 24 Regional Planning and Inter-jurisdictional Cooperation.............................. 28 Natural and Historic Resources .................................................................... 30 Land Use and Zoning.................................................................................. 63 Transportation.............................................................................................. 99 Utilities..... ..... ... .... ... ... ...... ..... ....... ... ... ..... ... ... ................. ....... ....... ........ ........ 121 Community Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro Part 9 Post-Revolt
    The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro Part 10 The End of the Road Table of Contents Fighting Words ............................................................................................................................... 2 The Unusually Permanent End of the Road .................................................................................. 10 Metro vs. Metrobus ....................................................................................................................... 14 The New President ........................................................................................................................ 18 A New Era in the District .............................................................................................................. 19 Home Rule At Last ....................................................................................................................... 21 1974 Transitions............................................................................................................................ 25 Winding Down the Freeways ........................................................................................................ 28 Searching For a Metro Plan .......................................................................................................... 37 The Fading Freeways .................................................................................................................... 50 Completing the Center Leg Freeway ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716
    City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: CB-21-2021 Food/Beverage Stores and Gas Stations in the R-A Zone DATE: March 31, 2021 County Council Member Todd Turner has presented CB-21-2021, a legislative bill that seeks to permit a food and beverage store and gas station in the R-A (Residential Agriculture) Zone, under certain circumstances (copy attached). The legislation was requested by the owner of a vacant, three-acre property located in the median of Maryland Route 3, south of Maryland Route 450, across from Beall Funeral Home (see map below). MAYOR Timothy J. Adams MAYOR PRO TEM Adrian Boafo COUNCIL Michael P. Esteve • Henri Gardner • Ingrid S. Harrison • Roxy Ndebumadu • Dufour Woolfley CITY MANAGER Alfred D. Lott City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityofbowie.org 2 Memo to City Council re: CB-21-2021 CB-21-2021 will revise the Permitted Uses in the R-A (Residential Agriculture) Zone to allow a food and beverage store with a gas station, which would be regulated as if the property were zoned C-M (Commercial Miscellaneous), subject to approval of a Detailed Site Plan. This legislation, which has already been presented at a County Council meeting, is awaiting review by the Council’s Committee of the Whole at an upcoming meeting. The property intended to benefit from this zoning text amendment is not within the City limits, which are close by at Whitemarsh Park, about 900 feet to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Company to Add, Change, And/Or 326,327, 328
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 516 IN THE MATTER OF : Served August 6, 1965 Applications of WMA Transit ) Applications Nos. 311, 312, 313 Company to Add, Change , and/or 326, 327, 328, 337 'Q", ""A's "F" Extend Routes and ) "T", in Prince Georges County, Docket No. 81 Maryland, and Washington, D.. C. APPEARANCE: STANLEY H. KAtEROW . Attorney for WMA Transit Company. WMA Transit Company filed applications to change, add, and/or extend the following routes: Application No. 311 - Add Route "Q" between Carrollton and Beltway Plaza as follows: From the intersection of Quentin Street and Lamont Drive , over Quentin Street , Lamont Street, Lamont Drive , Riverdale Road , Maryland Route 450, Maryland Route 564 , Telegraph Road, Cipriano Road , Glenn Dale Road, Greenbelt Road, Beltway Plaza service road to bus stand at Klein's Department Store , and return over the same route. App lication No. 312 - Extend Route "F" to Glenn Dale Sanitarium as fo -Lows : From the intersection of Volta Street and Varnum Street , over Varnum Street , Whitfield- Chapel Road, Maryland Route 704, Maryland Route 450, and Glenn Dale Road to Glenn Dale Sanitarium and return over the same route. as follows: From Prince Georges Hospital over Hospital Drive, Baltimore Washington Parkway, Mary- land Route 450 and Capital Plaza Service to bus stand at Montgomery Ward and Road 71 return over the same route. Application No. 326 - Extend Route "T" to Maryland Route 3 as follows: From Belair Shopping Center over Maryland Route 450 to Maryland Route 3 and return over the same route.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Regular Session
    LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 340 Chapter 340 (House Bill 845) AN ACT concerning Prince George’s County – Alcoholic Beverages – Carillon Development PG 315–20 FOR the purpose of authorizing the Board of License Commissioners for Prince George’s County to issue up to a certain number of Class B–DD licenses for restaurants located within the Carillon development; and generally relating to alcoholic beverages licenses in Prince George’s County. BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, Article – Alcoholic Beverages Section 26–102 and 26–1613(a) Annotated Code of Maryland (2016 Volume and 2019 Supplement) BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Alcoholic Beverages Section 26–1614(a) Annotated Code of Maryland (2016 Volume and 2019 Supplement) SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: Article – Alcoholic Beverages 26–102. This title applies only in Prince George’s County. 26–1613. (a) There is a Class B–DD (Development District) 7–day beer, wine, and liquor license. 26–1614. (a) The Board may issue: (1) up to four Class B–DD (Development District) licenses for restaurants located within the Capital Plaza commercial area, consisting of commercial properties – 1 – Ch. 340 2020 LAWS OF MARYLAND within the area bounded by the Baltimore–Washington Parkway on the west and northwest, Maryland Route 450 on the south, and Cooper Lane on the east and northeast; (2) up to four Class B–DD (Development District) licenses for restaurants located within the area
    [Show full text]