DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Control and Modern Authoritarianism in Museveni’S Uganda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Control and Modern Authoritarianism in Museveni’S Uganda OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi OXFORD STUDIES IN AFRICAN POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS General Editors NIC CHEESEMAN, PEACE MEDIE, AND RICARDO SOARES DE OLIVEIRA OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi Oxford Studies in African Politics and International Relations is a series for scholars and students working on African politics and International Relations and related disciplines. Volumes concentrate on contemporary developments in African political science, political economy, and International Relations, such as electoral politics, democratization, decentralization, gender and political representation, the political impact of natural resources, the dynamics and consequences of conflict, comparative political thought, and the nature of the continent’s engagement with the East and West. Comparative and mixed methods work is particularly encouraged. Case studies are welcomed but should demonstrate the broader theoretical and empirical implications of the study and its wider relevance to contemporary debates. The focus of the series is on sub- Saharan Africa, although proposals that explain how the region engages with North Africa and other parts of the world are of interest. OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi Arbitrary States Social Control and Modern Authoritarianism in Museveni’s Uganda REBECCA TAPSCOTT 1 OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Rebecca Tapscott 2021 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2021 Impression: 1 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of this licence should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2021933370 ISBN 978–0–19–885647–4 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198856474.001.0001 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work. OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi To my parents OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi Acknowledgements This book is a product of countless conversations, observations, exchanges of ideas, and encouragement that occurred over the better part of eight years. The book began as a PhD thesis, and the final manuscript owes a great deal to my supervisors. Alex de Waal, Dyan Mazurana, Jenny Aker, and Will Reno—each contributed substantially and uniquely to this project. Alex encouraged me to pursue interesting questions even when answers appeared elusive, and has con- tinued to patiently and generously engage with and support this project through its many iterations. Dyan’s attention to detail and thoughtful readings have critically developed and nuanced my work, in these pages and elsewhere. Jenny’s support and enthusiasm have been indispensable; her dual commitment to scientific inquiry and compassion continue to inspire me. I owe a special thanks to Will, who offered detailed comments on multiple versions of this manuscript, often articulating key aspects of my argument more clearly and concisely than I had been able to do myself. Will encouraged me to be ambitious and adventur- ous in my thinking, and continually pointed me toward the broader theoretical implications of my findings. The research would not have been possible without support of numerous donors. Fieldwork was supported by two research consortia—the Justice and Security Research Programme (JSRP, grant contract PO5729) and the Centre for Public Authority and International Development (CPAID, reference number ES/P008038/1)—both funded by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development. I received additional funding from the Gerda Henkel Foundation’s Special Programme for Security, Society and the State. JSRP and CPAID also offered me access to a bright and accomplished community of researchers studying authority, justice, and security in eastern Africa and beyond. Particular gratitude is owed to Tim Allen, who showed great faith in my potential as a young scholar, encouraging me to push forward on this project. Tim also helped me secure research funding that allowed me to return to Uganda over several years, and introduced me to the vibrant research community at the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa at the London School of Economics. I also received funds from the Morris Abrahams Foundation and the Fletcher School that allowed me to attend conferences and supported additional fieldwork costs. Revisions on this manuscript took place at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, where I was hosted at the Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy. The support of the Centre’s team was indispensable. Thank you to Shalini Randeria for welcoming me to the Centre, OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi viii and to Christine Lutringer for fostering a friendly and collaborative working environment. In Uganda, I was very lucky to meet and work with a diverse group of highly skilled researchers and scholars, each of whom brought their own perspectives and opinions to my project, and provided excellent company, valuable advice, moral and intellectual support, and encouragement in the field. I have opted not to include their names here out of what I hope is an abundance of caution for the possibility of a changing political environment. Most especially, I thank the many Ugandans who participated in this project. I hope they see their views reflected in these pages. Many other scholars have engaged with my ideas over the past five years, encouraging me to look at my questions and data in new ways. I cannot possibly name them all—a few people who were particularly generous with their time and thoughts include Rita Abrahamsen, Henni Alava, Cathy Boone, Adam Branch, Pierre Englebert, Julian Hopwood, Mette Lind Kusk, Gabrielle Lynch, Anna Macdonald, Dipali Mukhopadhyay, Dennis Rodgers, Nancy Rydberg, Philipp Schulz, Nora Stel, and Koen Vlassenroot. Others have offered incisive comments on parts of the text, including Jean-François Bayart, Jonathan Fisher, Jonathan Goodhand, Samuel Hickey, Ben Jones, Matthew Kandel, Keith Krause, Milli Lake, Didier Péclard, Holly Porter, Sungmin Rho, and Aidan Russell. I had opportunities to present this work and receive comments at the Conflict Research Group’s ‘Governance at the Edge of the State’ summer school in 2014, Northwestern University’s Program of African Studies Lecture Series in 2016, Uganda Elections Workshop hosted by Richard Vokes and Sam Wilkins in 2016, the Harvard-MIT-Tufts-Yale Political Violence Workshop in 2017, the Graduate Institute’s Political Science Faculty Seminar in 2018, as well as numerous inter- national conferences. The project further received valuable comments at two workshops that I co-organized on the politics of disorder—one at World Peace Foundation in 2017 and the other at the Democracy Centre in 2019. These workshops were generously funded by the World Peace Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Gerda Henkel Foundation. I owe a huge thanks to Nic Cheeseman, who has continually engaged with my ideas and encouraged me to be ambitious and bold in my endeavours. With Ricardo Soares de Oliveira and Dominic Byatt, Nic shepherded this project through the publishing process, and for that I am extremely thankful to all of them. The book also benefited from the insightful and constructively critical comments of three anonymous reviewers. Michelle Neiman and editors at Oxford University Press improved the prose with excellent editorial work. Parts of this book have appeared in journal articles: an early version of the argument appeared in an article in Development and Change; a version of the ethnographic vignette in Chapter 5 appears in an article OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi ix in African Affairs; and parts of Chapter 6 on crime preventers appear in an article in the Journal of Eastern African Studies. Most of all, my gratitude goes to friends and family whose belief that I would complete this book allowed me to do so: my husband and colleague, Deval Desai, joined me at the early stages of this project. His unflagging engagement has added depth and nuance to every page of this book. My parents, Susan Weinstein and Stephen Tapscott, and my sister, Leah, have unwaveringly supported and encour- aged my intellectual pursuits and aspirations. Finally, I thank the family that I have gained along the way—my son and my family-in-law—who have made my world bigger and my life fuller, and for whom I am immensely grateful. OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 17/5/2021, SPi Contents List of Figures xiii List of Tables xv List of Abbreviations xvii 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conference of Central and East European Countries on Fighting Corruption
    CONFERENCE OF CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ON FIGHTING CORRUPTION International Co-operation: Its Role in Preventing and Combating Corruption and in the Creation of Regional Strategies Bucharest, March 30-31st UN Global Programme against Corruption Programme Manager: Dr. Petter Langseth International Cooperation Dr. Petter Langseth Its Role in Preventing and Combating Corruption and in the Creation of Regional Strategies SUMMARY1 According to CICP’s Global Programme against Corruption the purpose of a national anti-corruption programme is to:(i) increase the risk and cost of being corrupt and (ii) build integrity that changes the rules of the game and the behaviour of the players and (iii) eventually ensure the rule of law. Among the few success stories, Hong Kong, should have taught us that it takes time and considerable effort to curb corruption in a systemic corrupt environment. After more than 25 years Hong Kong is spending US$ 90 million (1998) per year and employed 1300 staff who conducted 2780 training sessions for the private and public sector. This is probably more than what all 50 African countries spent fighting corruption in 1999.2 Taking into account the increasing number of international instruments dealing with corruption, the workshop will be aimed at promoting co-ordinated efforts for the development of joint strategies for implementation of international instrument and best prevention practices at the international, national and municipal level. The anti-corruption strategy advocated in this paper rests on four pillars: (a) economic development; (b) democratic reform; (c) a strong civil society with access to information and a mandate to oversee the state; and (d) the presence of rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding the Resource Curse
    Avoiding the Resource Curse Assessing patterns of causality between resource management potential and democratic deficits in neopatrimonial oil countries A case study from Uganda Eyvind J. Schumacher Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Culture, Environment and Sustainability Centre for Development and the Environment University of Oslo Blindern, Norway May 2014 II Table of Contents ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................ IX 1. CENTRAL RESEARCH QUESTION. .................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE. .................................................................................. 3 3. METHODOLOGY. .................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 AN INTERDISIPLINARY APROACH............................................................................................ 16 3.2 THE CASE STUDY APPROACH .................................................................................................. 17 3.3 COMPARATIVE STUDY ............................................................................................................ 20 3.4 INTERVIEWS ........................................................................................................................... 22 3.4.1 Interviewee list: ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Police Force Anti - Corruption Strategy
    UGANDA POLICE FORCE ANTI - CORRUPTION STRATEGY From Colonial Policing to Community Policing 2017/18-2021/22 Uganda Police Headquarters Naguru Plot 42/49, Katalima Road, P.o Box 7055, Kampala Uganda Fax: +256-414-343531/255630. General Lines: 256-414-343532/233814/231761/254033 Toll Free: 0800-199-699, 0800-199-499.Website: http://www.upf.go.ug Aligned to the JLOS Anti-corruption strategy With Support from Contents FOREWORD ........................................................................................... 4 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................ 6 CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUND ........................................................ 8 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................... 8 With Support from 1.1 Situational analysis ..................................................................... 10 1.2 Definition of Corruption ............................................................. 12 1.3 The Police Mandate .................................................................... 15 1.4 Forms of corruption in the UPF .................................................. 16 1.5 Factors influencing corruption in UPF ........................................ 17 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK TO FIGHT CORRUPTION IN UGANDA ................. 21 2.0 Introduction ................................................................................. 21 2.1 NRM Ten Point programme ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption in Uganda: Despite Small Gains, Citizens Pessimistic About Their Role
    Dispatch No. 77 | 28 March 2016 Fighting corruption in Uganda: Despite small gains, citizens pessimistic about their role Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 77 | John Martin Kewaza Summary Uganda’s widespread corruption is highlighted in the country’s poor ranking (139th out of 167 countries) in the Corruption Perceptions Index as well as in the recent Africa edition of the Global Corruption Barometer (Transparency International, 2015a, b). Pernicious effects stretch from substandard public services through elections and the judiciary to stunted economic development. In 2012, four in 10 respondents (41%) in an Afrobarometer survey reported that they had been offered money or a gift in return for their votes during the 2011 elections. In petitioning Parliament last year to appoint a commission of inquiry, retired Supreme Court Judge Justice George Kanyeihamba said, “There is evidence of inefficiency, incompetence, and corruption in the judiciary and unethical conduct by members of the bar” (Parliament of Uganda, 2015). The Black Monday Movement, a coalition of anti- corruption civil society organisations, estimates that between 2000 and 2014, the government lost more than Shs. 24 trillion to corruption – enough to finance the country’s 2015/2016 budget (ActionAid Uganda, 2015) The government’s strategies to fight corruption include the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS), the Anti-Corruption Act, and the establishment of a specialized anti-corruption court within the judiciary. Internationally, Uganda has been a signatory of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) as well as the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption since 2004. Many civil society organisations have joined the anti-corruption fight, including the Anti- Corruption Coalition, Transparency International Uganda, the African Parliamentarians Network against Corruption, Civil Society Today, the Uganda Debt Network, and the NGO Forum (Martini, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption in Africa – a Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation
    Fighting Corruption in Africa – A Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Verwaltungswissenschaften (Dr. rer. publ.) der Deutschen Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer vorgelegt von: Stefan Ittner Speyer, 2009 Erstgutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. iur. Hans Herbert von Arnim, Dipl.-Volkswirt Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Sefik Alp Bahadir Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 18. März 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ___________________________________________ 4 I. INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________ 5 1. Object and Scope of Study ______________________________________________ 5 2. Structure of the Study_________________________________________________ 15 II. DEFINING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 17 III. FIGHTING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 26 1. Common Strategies Against Corruption__________________________________ 26 2. Criteria For Judging the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Measures __________ 30 3. Difficulties in Fighting Corruption ______________________________________ 34 3.1 General Problems _________________________________________________________34 3.2 Specific Problems of Fighting Corruption in African Countries ______________________43 IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES IN UGANDA AND BOTSWANA_____________________________________ 50 1. Historical Background and Determining Factors of Corruption ______________ 50 1.1 Country Profiles___________________________________________________________50
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT YEMANE DESTA. Designing
    ABSTRACT YEMANE DESTA. Designing Anti-Corruption Strategies for Developing Countries: A Country Study of Eritrea. (Under the direction of James H. Svara) The purpose of this research is to identify the anti-corruption strategies available for fighting corruption in developing countries and assess their relevance to the newly independent country of Eritrea by canvassing the opinions of Eritrean public officials. The anti-corruption strategies considered in the study are divided into four broad categories: Economic/Market Reforms, Administrative/Bureaucratic Reforms, Accountability/Transparency Enhancing Reforms, and Political Accountability Enhancing Reforms. Data are collected through the administration of questionnaires to a sample of 62 Eritrean public officials from 13 ministries of the Eritrean Government to assess their views regarding the extent, causes and remedies of corruption in Eritrea. The survey evidence indicates that the overwhelming majority (90 percent) of the respondents believe the issue of corruption in the context of Eritrean public administration is important. Moreover, an overwhelming majority (95 percent) of the respondents think that high emphasis should be given to preventing/fighting corruption at present. For the years 2000 and 2003 the majority (64.5 percent) of the respondents believe that corruption in Eritrea ranges between none to minimal while 35.5 percent think corruption in Eritrea ranges between moderate to prevalent. Two important differences are observed between respondents who perceive lower rates of corruption and those who perceive higher rates of corruption. The research indicates that respondents who have not received foreign education are more likely to perceive higher levels of corruption (38 percent) than respondents who received foreign education (18 percent).
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Media in Curbing Corruption: the Case of Uganda Under President Yoweri K
    Economic & Social Affairs DESA Working Paper No. 72 ST/ESA/2009/DWP/72 January 2009 Role of media in curbing corruption: the case of Uganda under President Yoweri K. Museveni during the “no-party” system Monica Nogara Abstract Free, independent and hard-hitting media can play an important role in curbing corruption. Media in Uganda has enjoyed considerable freedom in this regard since Museveni came to power in 1986. The evolving power structure and a changing media landscape, however, have presented both challenges and opportunities for media’s watchdog role on corruption. This paper will explore how this environment defined such role between 1986 and 2006 during Museveni’s “no-party” rule. It argues that, although media won important battles to promote accountability in public offices, the regime’s complex power structure has consistently challenged their role as an instrument of public accountability. JEL Classification: D72, D73, D81, D82, D83, H11, K40, L82 Keywords: corruption, media, press freedom, governance, rule of law Monica Nogara is currently Economic Affairs Officer in the Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination. E-mail: [email protected] Comments should be addressed by email to the author. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The role of media in curbing corruption ............................................................................. 2 The case of Uganda under President Yoweri K. Museveni ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Political Question Doctrine in Uganda
    Political Question Doctrine in Uganda An analysis of the technicalities on the realization of the freedoms of expression, association and Assembly in Uganda J. Oloka-Onyango MAKERERE UNIVERSITY Acknowledgment This paper was written for Chapter Four Uganda by J. Oloka-Onyango, a Professor of Law at Makerere University, School of Law. Research assistance was provided by Dorah Kankunda, Dan Bill Opio, and Joseph Byomuhangyi. Copyright © 2017 Chapter Four Uganda All rights reserved. Chapter Four Uganda is an independent not-for-profit organisation dedicated to the protection of civil liberties and promotion of human rights for all. We promote human dignity and advance rights through robust, strategic and non-discriminatory legal response. For more information, please visit: http://chapterfouruganda.com The Production of this paper was generously funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). 01 05 Introduction Association and its 4 Protection and Violation 24 02 06 Technicalities and the The Question of Assembly PQD: The Good, the 30 Bad and the Ugly 6 Table of Contents 03 07 The Constitutional Conclusion Framework and the 34 Movement towards Inclusion 10 04 Freedom of Expression, Media Rights and Access to Information (A2I) 4.1 Expression and Media 15 Rights 4.2 Access to Information 19 01 Introduction 4 Political Question Doctrine in Uganda nsofar as a great deal of the Law is concerned with access to and the delivery of Justice, it is something of a surprise how much of the Law is in fact devoted to its subversion. Nowhere is the subversion of Justice more apparent than in the use of technicalities by lawyers in order to prevent a matter from being fully heard by the Icourts of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitation in the Criminal Justice System a Systems Analysis of Corruption in the Police and Courts in Northern Uganda
    OCCASIONAL PAPER Institute for Human Security • The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy • Tufts University • +1 (617) 627-7940 • fletcher.tufts.edu/IHS SEPTEMBER 2016 Series 1, Number 2 Facilitation in the Criminal Justice System A Systems Analysis of Corruption in the Police and Courts in Northern Uganda. CHEYANNE SCHARBAtke-ChurCH AND DIANA CHIGAS WITH ASSISTANCE FROM SASKIA BRECHENMACHER, TEDDY ATIM, JULIET H. HATANGA, SOPHIA DAWKINS Institute for Human Security The Institute for Human Security (IHS) at The Fletcher School, Tufts Acknowledgements University focuses on the security and protection of individuals and communities while promoting peace and sustainable development. To achieve this, IHS catalyzes collaboration between and creates syn- The authors would like to extend their gratitude to a ergies among the fields that place people at the center of concern: con- number of talented individuals who made this proj- flict resolution, human rights, humanitarian studies, and political and economic development. Our research, education, and policy engage- ect possible. As a field research team Saskia Brech- ment emphasize the following principles: protection and promotion enmacher, Teddy Atim and Juliet Hatanga are in a of the rights of at-risk populations, empowerment of people, and pro- motion of responsible government and institutional practices. league of their own. Their intelligence, hard work For more information on the research project, please visit and critical thinking contributed greatly to the pro- fletcher.tufts.edu/Institute-for-Human-Security/Research/Build- cess. Sophia Dawkins was an important discussion ing-State-Legitimacy partner with a keen eye to evidence and logical argu- Corruption, Justice and Legitimacy Project mentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Leadership in Fighting Corruption in Uganda
    7 The Importance of Leadership in Fighting Corruption in Uganda AUGUSTINE RUZINDANA Africa is now the worlds top development problem, and the role of corruption in development has been much debated. Uganda has under- taken significant economic and political reforms over the past decade and is showing that Africas problems are not insurmountable. But what Uganda has done is just to stop sinking. It is not yet safely afloat; the actual conditions facing the country are still miserable and the immedi- ate future still looks bleak. The measures the government has taken were designed to arrest the sinking process, but whether they are enough to keep the country afloat and take us to dry land is another matter. We must, therefore, be modest about our achievements; otherwise we may fail to appreciate the tremendous tasks and hurdles still facing us. The key to success in Uganda has been a leadership that has brought political stability and peace. This has made it possible to initiate and implement a series of programs and policies for the countrys economy, politics, and governance that have made democracy and a constitutional order possible. As a result, there is a new constitution that incorporates a bill of rights, a political system that does not gag anyone, the rule of law, freedom of expression, and regular elections. Full-fledged political party activities have been shelved for the time being, but democracy does not depend mainly on political organizations, which come and go. Democracy depends on the rights and freedoms enshrined in a Augustine Ruzindana is a member of the Ugandan Parliament and serves as chairman of its Public Accounts Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Assoc
    REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Assoc. Prof. Yasin Olum (PhD) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung but rather those of the author. MULTIPARTY POLITICS IN UGANDA i REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 51A, Prince Charles Drive, Kololo P. O. Box 647, Kampala Tel. +256 414 25 46 11 www.kas.de ISBN: 978 - 9970 - 153 - 09 - 1 Author Assoc. Prof. Yasin Olum (PhD) © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung ii MULTIPARTY POLITICS IN UGANDA Table of Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................... 1 List of Tables ................................................................................................. 3 Acronyms/Abbreviations ................................................................................. 4 Introduction .................................................................................................. 7 PART 1: THE MULTIPARTY ENVIRONMENT: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND INSTITUTIONS ........................... 11 Chapter One: ‘Democratic’ Transition in Africa and the Case of Uganda ........................... 12 Introduction ................................................................................................... 12 Defining Democracy
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Deep Dive 2020
    Uganda - Threat Assessment - 2020 Page 1 of 41 slaves, and an incidence of 7.6/1000 people Uganda � and a “B” response. US Trafficking in Persons Tier 2 watchlist rating. Section 1 - Executive Summary Sanctions & Terrorism: There are no sanctions Grey Lists: Uganda is listed by FATF & is against the country. Uganda is a Tier 2 proposed by the EU on their “Grey” list. (Moderate threat) PPI 2019 (Proliferation) Index Uganda is not listed by the US as a “Country of Country with a “Low” response score of Primary Concern” in respect of ML & FC. 295/1,300. Uganda has a “Low” impact score (3.957/10) in the Global Terrorism Index 2019. NRA: Uganda published its first NRA in 2017, Uganda is included in US Country Reports on with findings that domestically most proceeds- Terrorism. generating predicate offences are corruption, fraud, tax crimes, and counterfeiting of goods. Response & Resilience: FATF MER 4th round In terms of numbers of reported/detected results by ESAAMLG were 50/100 for technical cases, fraud is the most reported/detected compliance (40 Recommendations) & 0/100 crime, followed by tax crimes and corruption. for effectiveness (11 Outcomes). Uganda External or transnational threats are drug scored 3.63/10 for resilience (Low), ranked trafficking, human trafficking, smuggling and 29/54 for Africa in the OC Index. wildlife offences, as well as some elements of Indices: Uganda scored 34/100 and was rated tax evasion. “not free” in the 2019 Freedom in the World Organised Crime: According to the 2019 OC report and 59.5/100 for economic freedom Index, High Criminality - Low Resilience.
    [Show full text]