Phylogenomics of Thecamoebida (Discosea, Amoebozoa) with The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenomics of Thecamoebida (Discosea, Amoebozoa) with The Protist, Vol. 170, 8–20, February 2019 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 16 October 2018 ORIGINAL PAPER Phylogenomics of Thecamoebida (Discosea, Amoebozoa) with the Description of Stratorugosa tubuloviscum gen. nov. sp. nov., a Freshwater Amoeba with a Perinuclear MTOC 1 James T. Melton III , Fiona C. Wood, Jordan Branch, Mandakini Singla, and Yonas I. Tekle Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane Southwest, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA Submitted March 19, 2018; Accepted September 18, 2018 Monitoring Editor: Sandra L. Baldauf Thecamoebida Smirnov and Cavalier-Smith, 2011 (Discosea, Amoebozoa) has been molecularly under- studied. The group until recently consisted of three genera containing species that live in terrestrial or aquatic environments. Here, we describe a fourth genus, Stratorugosa tubuloviscum gen. nov. sp. nov., which was isolated from a freshwater Amoeba proteus Ward’s Science culture. Although this species most closely morphologically resembles a large, rugose Thecamoeba, S. tubuloviscum gen. nov. sp. nov. can be differentiated from Thecamoeba spp. by the following: 1) the presence of definitive finger-like (lobate-like) subpseudopodia extending at both the anterior and lateral parts of the cell dur- ing locomotion; 2) a peculiar locomotive mechanism with two sections, frontal and back, of the cells moving in a pulling and piggyback movement, respectively; 3) the presence of fibrillar cytoplasmic microtubules (MTs) organized by a prominent, perinuclear microtubule-organizing center (MTOC). A phylogenomic analysis of 511 genes assembled from transcriptomic data showed that this new genus was highly supported as sister to Stenamoeba. Despite the variance in gross morphology, Stenamoeba and S. tubuloviscum gen nov. sp. nov. both have MTOCs unlike two Thecamoeba spp., which display dot-like cytoplasmic MTs and lack an MTOC. © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Key words: Amoebozoa; Thecamoebidae; phylogenomics; transcriptome; new genus; new species. 1 Corresponding author. e-mail [email protected] (J.T. Melton III). Abbreviations: ICC, Immunocytochemistry; MT, microtubules; MTOC, microtubule-organizing center; OG, orthologous group; SSU, small subunit rDNA (18S). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2018.09.002 1434-4610/© 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Phylogenomics of Thecamoebida 9 Introduction et al. 2007). These three genera of Thecamoebidae are characterized by striate, rugose, and lingu- The amoebozoan family Thecamoebidae was orig- late morphologies (morphotypes sensu Smirnov inally described by Schaeffer (1926) for naked and Goodkov 1999; Smirnov and Brown 2004). amoebae with ovoid to circular shapes that lacked Species in this group mostly have a thin, electron- pseudopodial extensions and for the most part dense cell coat and often have a glycocalyx layer maintained a consistent shape. This group has (Dyková et al. 2010; Geisen et al. 2014; Goodfellow gone through several taxonomic expansions and et al. 1974; Page and Blakey 1979; Smirnov et al. contractions, and has been understudied in molec- 2011; Wylezich et al. 2015) that sometimes has ular studies. Schaeffer (1926) originally included glycostyle-like structures (as observed in Sappinia two genera in this family, Thecamoeba and diploidea; Michel et al. 2006). Rugipes. The type species of the latter (R. bilzi The monophyly of Thecamoeba, Sappinia, and Schaeffer, 1926) is now considered to be a tax- Stenamoeba has been supported by phylogenetic onomic synonym of Thecamoeba (Page 1969, analyses based on SSU-rDNA (18S) (Michel et al. 1971), and other members of this genus, R. vivax 2006; Pawlowski and Burki 2009; Shadwick et al. Schaeffer, 1926 and R. placidus Page, 1968, have 2009; Smirnov et al. 2007; Tekle et al. 2008), now been moved to separate vannellid genera a concatenation of SSU and actin genes (Lahr (i.e., Clydonella in Sawyer (1975) and Vannella et al. 2011), and phylogenomics with transcrip- in Bovee (1965), respectively). More recently, tome data (Kang et al. 2017). This clade has this family used to be comprised of eight gen- been defined using the name of the order, The- era of naked amoebae with a pellicle-like cell camoebida (Adl et al. 2005, 2012; Kang et al. coat that are morphologically diverse (i.e., stri- 2017), which will be used hereafter. Our recent ate, rugose, lingulate, and polytactic morphotypes) phylogenomic studies reported that Thecamoebida (Page 1987, 1988; Smirnov et al. 2011). These forms a strong affiliation to a robust clade Fla- genera included Thecamoeba Fromentel, 1874; bellinea (Dactylopodida + Vannellida) (Tekle et al. Sappinia Dangeard, 1896; Stenamoeba Smirnov, 2016; Tekle and Wood 2017); however, The- Nassonova, Chao, et Cavalier-Smith, 2007; Der- camoebida in these studies also included the mamoeba Page et Blakey, 1979; Paradermamoeba unstable taxon Vermistella with poor support and Smirnov et Goodkov, 1996; Parvamoeba Roger- lacked Sappinia in the phylogenetic analysis. This son, 1993; Pseudothecamoeba Page, 1988; and finding is contrary to previous classifications of Thecochaos Page, 1981. Thecamoebida within Longamoebia (Dermamoe- Increasing amounts of molecular data and mor- bida + Thecamoebida + Centramoebida) – a lin- phological characters are continuing to shape eage that included flat amoebae with pointed sub- our knowledge of this group. A closer examina- pseudopodia and elongated cell shape (Smirnov tion of this taxon resulted in major taxonomic et al. 2011). The monophyly of Longamoebia was revisions (see Smirnov et al. 2011). These revi- questioned in our most recent phylogenomic stud- sions include the transfer of genera previously ies (Tekle and Wood 2017). Similarly, another placed within the Thecamoebidae into other phylogenomic analysis with increased taxon sam- taxonomic groups (i.e., Dermamoeba and Para- pling also corroborates our findings and placed the dermamoeba to Dermamoebidae; Parvamoeba to Thecamoebida within the Flabellinia (Kang et al. Himatismenida- taxonomic revision made based on 2017). SSU and actin trees from Kudryavtsev et al. (2011)) Thecamoebida contains species that live in or have been placed as incertae sedis due to the freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments high degree of variation in morphology from the (e.g., Brown et al. 2007; Geisen et al. 2014; core thecamoebids and lack of molecular data (i.e., Kudryavtsev and Hausmann 2009; Michel et al. the polytactic genera Pseudothecamoeba and The- 2012; Page 1977, 1983, 1988). Some species are cochaos placed as incertae sedis in Smirnov et al. potentially pathogenic to humans causing amoebic 2005) (Smirnov et al. 2011). Only three core gen- encephalitis (Sappinia diploidea in Gelman et al. era (i.e., Thecamoeba, Sappinia, and Stenamoeba) 2001; Gelman et al. 2003) and to other animals have remained in the family Thecamoebidae prior including fishes (Thecamoeba hoffmani in Sawyer to this study (Smirnov et al. 2011). Stenamoeba et al. 1974; two species of Stenamoeba, S. ama- stenopodia (previously Platyamoeba stenopodia in zonica and S. limacina, in Dyková et al. 2010) Page 1969) was originally identified as a vannellid and horses (Stenamoeba polymorpha in Peglar amoeba; however, SSU data showed that this iso- et al. 2016). Historically, over 20 Thecamoeba late clustered within the Thecamoebidae (Smirnov species have been described. This genus currently 10 J.T. Melton III et al. contains 11 species that are accepted taxonomi- the uroidal part of the cell is dragged forward. cally (combined from Page 1983, 1988; Smirnov Contains a perinuclear MTOC, and microtubules and Goodkov 1999; Kudryavtsev and Hausmann wrap around the nucleus. 2009). These species have either a rugose or a TYPE SPECIES: Stratorugosa tubuloviscum striated morphology and a pellicle-like cell coat Melton et Tekle (Page and Blakey 1979; Page 1988; Smirnov and Goodkov 1999; Smirnov et al. 2011). The- ETYMOLOGY: The name was derived from Latin in camoeba species range in length from as small two parts; “stratum” meaning “layer” and “rugosa” ␮ as 11 m (T. orbis Schaeffer, 1926 (Page 1977)) to meaning “wrinkled”. as large as over 150 ␮m (T. terricola Greeff, 1866 Stratorugosa tubuloviscum Melton et Tekle, n. sp. (Page 1977)). There are currently only three known DIAGNOSIS: Cells rugose and sometimes striate. species of Sappinia Dangaerd, 1986 that exhibit Cells broadly fan-shaped, triangular, to spatulate rugose, striate (Smirnov et al. 2011), and lingu- during locomotion. A knob-shaped or elongated late (Wylezich et al. 2015) morphologies and are uroid frequently present while moving. Cells chang- bi- to tetranucleate (Brown et al. 2007; Michel et al. ing direction bi- to tri-lobate. Lobose or finger-like 2006; Wylezich et al. 2015). These cells range in subpseudopodia sometimes present at anterior length from 35–85 ␮m as observed in S. pedata or posterior positions. Average locomotive cell (Brown et al. 2007). Six lingulate and sometimes sizes 89.8 ␮m (range from 47.5 ␮m to 134.9 ␮m) striate species are currently accepted taxonomi- in length and 72.6 ␮m (range from 34.7 ␮m to cally for Stenamoeba Smirnov, Nassova, Chao et 122.1 ␮m) in width. Floating cells with many Cavalier-Smith, 2007 (Page 1969 as Platyamoeba radiating pseudopodia up to 60 ␮m in length. Cells stenopodia; Dyková et al. 2010; Geisen et al. 2014; uninucleate (average: 10.6 ␮m; range: 8.5 ␮m Peglar et al. 2016; Smirnov et al. 2007), and are the to 13 ␮m; oval to round in shape) with a single, smallest thecamoebid cells ranging from 10.1 ␮m to central and spherical to oval-shaped
Recommended publications
  • Download This Publication (PDF File)
    PUBLIC LIBRARY of SCIENCE | plosgenetics.org | ISSN 1553-7390 | Volume 2 | Issue 12 | DECEMBER 2006 GENETICS PUBLIC LIBRARY of SCIENCE www.plosgenetics.org Volume 2 | Issue 12 | DECEMBER 2006 Interview Review Knight in Common Armor: 1949 Unraveling the Genetics 1956 An Interview with Sir John Sulston e225 of Human Obesity e188 Jane Gitschier David M. Mutch, Karine Clément Research Articles Natural Variants of AtHKT1 1964 The Complete Genome 2039 Enhance Na+ Accumulation e210 Sequence and Comparative e206 in Two Wild Populations of Genome Analysis of the High Arabidopsis Pathogenicity Yersinia Ana Rus, Ivan Baxter, enterocolitica Strain 8081 Balasubramaniam Muthukumar, Nicholas R. Thomson, Sarah Jeff Gustin, Brett Lahner, Elena Howard, Brendan W. Wren, Yakubova, David E. Salt Matthew T. G. Holden, Lisa Crossman, Gregory L. Challis, About the Cover Drosophila SPF45: A Bifunctional 1974 Carol Churcher, Karen The jigsaw image of representatives Protein with Roles in Both e178 Mungall, Karen Brooks, Tracey of various lines of eukaryote evolution Splicing and DNA Repair Chillingworth, Theresa Feltwell, refl ects the current lack of consensus as Ahmad Sami Chaouki, Helen K. Zahra Abdellah, Heidi Hauser, to how the major branches of eukaryotes Salz Kay Jagels, Mark Maddison, fi t together. The illustrations from upper Sharon Moule, Mandy Sanders, left to bottom right are as follows: a single Mammalian Small Nucleolar 1984 Sally Whitehead, Michael A. scale from the surface of Umbellosphaera; RNAs Are Mobile Genetic e205 Quail, Gordon Dougan, Julian Amoeba, the large amoeboid organism Elements Parkhill, Michael B. Prentice used as an introduction to protists for Michel J. Weber many school children; Euglena, the iconic Low Levels of Genetic 2052 fl agellate that is often used to challenge Soft Sweeps III: The Signature 1998 Divergence across e215 ideas of plants (Euglena has chloroplasts) of Positive Selection from e186 Geographically and and animals (Euglena moves); Stentor, Recurrent Mutation Linguistically Diverse one of the larger ciliates; Cacatua, the Pleuni S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemeba N. Gen., a Novel Genus of Hartmannellid Amoebae (Tubulinea, Amoebozoa); with an Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Saccamoeba
    The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology ISSN 1066-5234 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ptolemeba n. gen., a Novel Genus of Hartmannellid Amoebae (Tubulinea, Amoebozoa); with an Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Saccamoeba Pamela M. Watsona, Stephanie C. Sorrella & Matthew W. Browna,b a Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762 b Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing & Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762 Keywords ABSTRACT 18S rRNA; amoeba; amoeboid; Cashia; cristae; freshwater amoebae; Hartmannella; Hartmannellid amoebae are an unnatural assemblage of amoeboid organisms mitochondrial morphology; SSU rDNA; SSU that are morphologically difficult to discern from one another. In molecular phy- rRNA; terrestrial amoebae; tubulinid. logenetic trees of the nuclear-encoded small subunit rDNA, they occupy at least five lineages within Tubulinea, a well-supported clade in Amoebozoa. The Correspondence polyphyletic nature of the hartmannellids has led to many taxonomic problems, M.W. Brown, Department of Biological in particular paraphyletic genera. Recent taxonomic revisions have alleviated Sciences, Mississippi State University, some of the problems. However, the genus Saccamoeba is paraphyletic and is Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA still in need of revision as it currently occupies two distinct lineages. Here, we Telephone number: +1 662-325-2406; report a new clade on the tree of Tubulinea, which we infer represents a novel FAX number: +1 662-325-7939; genus that we name Ptolemeba n. gen. This genus subsumes a clade of hart- e-mail: [email protected] mannellid amoebae that were previously considered in the genus Saccamoeba, but whose mitochondrial morphology is distinct from Saccamoeba.
    [Show full text]
  • Protistology Mitochondrial Genomes of Amoebozoa
    Protistology 13 (4), 179–191 (2019) Protistology Mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa Natalya Bondarenko1, Alexey Smirnov1, Elena Nassonova1,2, Anna Glotova1,2 and Anna Maria Fiore-Donno3 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Laboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology RAS, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia 3 University of Cologne, Institute of Zoology, Terrestrial Ecology, 50674 Cologne, Germany | Submitted November 28, 2019 | Accepted December 10, 2019 | Summary In this mini-review, we summarize the current knowledge on mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa. Amoebozoa is a major, early-diverging lineage of eukaryotes, containing at least 2,400 species. At present, 32 mitochondrial genomes belonging to 18 amoebozoan species are publicly available. A dearth of information is particularly obvious for two major amoebozoan clades, Variosea and Tubulinea, with just one mitochondrial genome sequenced for each. The main focus of this review is to summarize features such as mitochondrial gene content, mitochondrial genome size variation, and presence or absence of RNA editing, showing if they are unique or shared among amoebozoan lineages. In addition, we underline the potential of mitochondrial genomes for multigene phylogenetic reconstruction in Amoebozoa, where the relationships among lineages are not fully resolved yet. With the increasing application of next-generation sequencing techniques and reliable protocols, we advocate mitochondrial
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intestinal Protozoa
    The Intestinal Protozoa A. Introduction 1. The Phylum Protozoa is classified into four major subdivisions according to the methods of locomotion and reproduction. a. The amoebae (Superclass Sarcodina, Class Rhizopodea move by means of pseudopodia and reproduce exclusively by asexual binary division. b. The flagellates (Superclass Mastigophora, Class Zoomasitgophorea) typically move by long, whiplike flagella and reproduce by binary fission. c. The ciliates (Subphylum Ciliophora, Class Ciliata) are propelled by rows of cilia that beat with a synchronized wavelike motion. d. The sporozoans (Subphylum Sporozoa) lack specialized organelles of motility but have a unique type of life cycle, alternating between sexual and asexual reproductive cycles (alternation of generations). e. Number of species - there are about 45,000 protozoan species; around 8000 are parasitic, and around 25 species are important to humans. 2. Diagnosis - must learn to differentiate between the harmless and the medically important. This is most often based upon the morphology of respective organisms. 3. Transmission - mostly person-to-person, via fecal-oral route; fecally contaminated food or water important (organisms remain viable for around 30 days in cool moist environment with few bacteria; other means of transmission include sexual, insects, animals (zoonoses). B. Structures 1. trophozoite - the motile vegetative stage; multiplies via binary fission; colonizes host. 2. cyst - the inactive, non-motile, infective stage; survives the environment due to the presence of a cyst wall. 3. nuclear structure - important in the identification of organisms and species differentiation. 4. diagnostic features a. size - helpful in identifying organisms; must have calibrated objectives on the microscope in order to measure accurately.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa
    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Proteomic Profiling of Newly Acquired, Virulent And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Comparative proteomic profling of newly acquired, virulent and attenuated Neoparamoeba perurans proteins associated with amoebic gill disease Kerrie Ní Dhufaigh1*, Eugene Dillon2, Natasha Botwright3, Anita Talbot1, Ian O’Connor1, Eugene MacCarthy1 & Orla Slattery4 The causative agent of amoebic gill disease, Neoparamoeba perurans is reported to lose virulence during prolonged in vitro maintenance. In this study, the impact of prolonged culture on N. perurans virulence and its proteome was investigated. Two isolates, attenuated and virulent, had their virulence assessed in an experimental trial using Atlantic salmon smolts and their bacterial community composition was evaluated by 16S rRNA Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Soluble proteins were isolated from three isolates: a newly acquired, virulent and attenuated N. perurans culture. Proteins were analysed using two-dimensional electrophoresis coupled with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The challenge trial using naïve smolts confrmed a loss in virulence in the attenuated N. perurans culture. A greater diversity of bacterial communities was found in the microbiome of the virulent isolate in contrast to a reduction in microbial community richness in the attenuated microbiome. A collated proteome database of N. perurans, Amoebozoa and four bacterial genera resulted in 24 proteins diferentially expressed between the three cultures. The present LC–MS/ MS results indicate protein synthesis, oxidative stress and immunomodulation are upregulated in a newly acquired N. perurans culture and future studies may exploit these protein identifcations for therapeutic purposes in infected farmed fsh. Neoparamoeba perurans is an ectoparasitic protozoan responsible for the hyperplastic gill infection of marine cultured fnfsh referred to as amoebic gill disease (AGD)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Listeria–Tetrahymena–Amoeba Food Chain Functioning Depends on Bacterial Virulence Traits Valentina I
    Pushkareva et al. BMC Ecol (2019) 19:47 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0265-5 BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Experimental Listeria–Tetrahymena–Amoeba food chain functioning depends on bacterial virulence traits Valentina I. Pushkareva1, Julia I. Podlipaeva2, Andrew V. Goodkov2 and Svetlana A. Ermolaeva1,3* Abstract Background: Some pathogenic bacteria have been developing as a part of terrestrial and aquatic microbial eco- systems. Bacteria are consumed by bacteriovorous protists which are readily consumed by larger organisms. Being natural predators, protozoa are also an instrument for selection of virulence traits in bacteria. Moreover, protozoa serve as a “Trojan horse” that deliver pathogens to the human body. Here, we suggested that carnivorous amoebas feeding on smaller bacteriovorous protists might serve as “Troy” themselves when pathogens are delivered to them with their preys. A dual role might be suggested for protozoa in the development of traits required for bacterial passage along the food chain. Results: A model food chain was developed. Pathogenic bacteria L. monocytogenes or related saprophytic bacteria L. innocua constituted the base of the food chain, bacteriovorous ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis was an intermedi- ate consumer, and carnivorous amoeba Amoeba proteus was a consumer of the highest order. The population of A. proteus demonstrated variations in behaviour depending on whether saprophytic or virulent Listeria was used to feed the intermediate consumer, T. pyriformis. Feeding of A. proteus with T. pyriformis that grazed on saprophytic bacteria caused prevalence of pseudopodia-possessing hungry amoebas. Statistically signifcant prevalence of amoebas with spherical morphology typical for fed amoebas was observed when pathogenic L.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Flagellates – the New Recently Discovered Deep Branches of the Eukaryotic Tree and Their Evolutionary and Ecological Significance
    Protistology 14 (1), 15–22 (2020) Protistology Predatory flagellates – the new recently discovered deep branches of the eukaryotic tree and their evolutionary and ecological significance Denis V. Tikhonenkov Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, 152742, Russia | Submitted March 20, 2020 | Accepted April 6, 2020 | Summary Predatory protists are poorly studied, although they are often representing important deep-branching evolutionary lineages and new eukaryotic supergroups. This short review/opinion paper is inspired by the recent discoveries of various predatory flagellates, which form sister groups of the giant eukaryotic clusters on phylogenetic trees, and illustrate an ancestral state of one or another supergroup of eukaryotes. Here we discuss their evolutionary and ecological relevance and show that the study of such protists may be essential in addressing previously puzzling evolutionary problems, such as the origin of multicellular animals, the plastid spread trajectory, origins of photosynthesis and parasitism, evolution of mitochondrial genomes. Key words: evolution of eukaryotes, heterotrophic flagellates, mitochondrial genome, origin of animals, photosynthesis, predatory protists, tree of life Predatory flagellates and diversity of eu- of the hidden diversity of protists (Moon-van der karyotes Staay et al., 2000; López-García et al., 2001; Edg- comb et al., 2002; Massana et al., 2004; Richards The well-studied multicellular animals, plants and Bass, 2005; Tarbe et al., 2011; de Vargas et al., and fungi immediately come to mind when we hear 2015). In particular, several prevailing and very abun- the term “eukaryotes”. However, these groups of dant ribogroups such as MALV, MAST, MAOP, organisms represent a minority in the real diversity MAFO (marine alveolates, stramenopiles, opistho- of evolutionary lineages of eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • CH28 PROTISTS.Pptx
    9/29/14 Biosc 41 Announcements 9/29 Review: History of Life v Quick review followed by lecture quiz (history & v How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? phylogeny) v What is thought to have been the first genetic material? v Lecture: Protists v Are we tetrapods? v Lab: Protozoa (animal-like protists) v Most atmospheric oxygen comes from photosynthesis v Lab exam 1 is Wed! (does not cover today’s lab) § Since many of the first organisms were photosynthetic (i.e. cyanobacteria), a LOT of excess oxygen accumulated (O2 revolution) § Some organisms adapted to use it (aerobic respiration) Review: History of Life Review: Phylogeny v Which organelles are thought to have originated as v Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry endosymbionts? v Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution v During what event did fossils resembling modern taxa suddenly appear en masse? v A valid clade is monophyletic, meaning it consists of the ancestor taxon and all its descendants v How many mass extinctions seem to have occurred during v A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and Earth’s history? Describe one? some, but not all, of the descendants v When is adaptive radiation likely to occur? v A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor v Maximum parsimony assumes the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary events is most likely Quiz 3 (History and Phylogeny) BIOSC 041 1. How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? 2. Why might many organisms have evolved to use aerobic respiration? PROTISTS! Reference: Chapter 28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Protistology an International Journal Vol
    Protistology An International Journal Vol. 10, Number 2, 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM «PROTIST–2016» Yuri Mazei (Vice-Chairman) Welcome Address 2 Organizing Committee 3 Organizers and Sponsors 4 Abstracts 5 Author Index 94 Forum “PROTIST-2016” June 6–10, 2016 Moscow, Russia Website: http://onlinereg.ru/protist-2016 WELCOME ADDRESS Dear colleagues! Republic) entitled “Diplonemids – new kids on the block”. The third lecture will be given by Alexey The Forum “PROTIST–2016” aims at gathering Smirnov (Saint Petersburg State University, Russia): the researchers in all protistological fields, from “Phylogeny, diversity, and evolution of Amoebozoa: molecular biology to ecology, to stimulate cross- new findings and new problems”. Then Sandra disciplinary interactions and establish long-term Baldauf (Uppsala University, Sweden) will make a international scientific cooperation. The conference plenary presentation “The search for the eukaryote will cover a wide range of fundamental and applied root, now you see it now you don’t”, and the fifth topics in Protistology, with the major focus on plenary lecture “Protist-based methods for assessing evolution and phylogeny, taxonomy, systematics and marine water quality” will be made by Alan Warren DNA barcoding, genomics and molecular biology, (Natural History Museum, United Kingdom). cell biology, organismal biology, parasitology, diversity and biogeography, ecology of soil and There will be two symposia sponsored by ISoP: aquatic protists, bioindicators and palaeoecology. “Integrative co-evolution between mitochondria and their hosts” organized by Sergio A. Muñoz- The Forum is organized jointly by the International Gómez, Claudio H. Slamovits, and Andrew J. Society of Protistologists (ISoP), International Roger, and “Protists of Marine Sediments” orga- Society for Evolutionary Protistology (ISEP), nized by Jun Gong and Virginia Edgcomb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
    [Show full text]