Download (2MB)

Gray, Hazel Sophia (2012) Tanzania and Vietnam: A Comparative Political Economy Ofeconomic Transition. PhD Thesis, SOAS (School of Oriental and African Studies) http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/13610 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Tanzania and Vietnam: A Comparative Political Economy of Economic Transition Hazel Sophia Gray Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Economics 2012 Department of Economics School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Declaration for PhD thesis I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the School of Oriental and African Studies concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination. Signed: ____________________________ Date: _________________ 2 Abstract This thesis explores the process of economic transition in two contemporary developing countries from a political economy perspective. Tanzania and Vietnam were at the forefront of the struggle to construct socialism in the twentieth century. Since the 1990s Tanzania and Vietnam have been championed by international development institutions as success stories of market liberalization, achieving growth rates above their regional averages. Yet both economies have also been associated with high levels of corruption under the continued control of the pre-reform ruling party. The pattern of economic growth cannot be adequately explained by New Institutional Economics. Instead, the thesis uses a Political Settlements framework for analysis. Features of the formative socialist political settlement were critical for the evolution of the political settlement under liberalisation. The thesis explores how the political settlement influenced processes of political redistribution, primitive accumulation and technology acquisition under liberalisation. These processes are examined through case studies of reform in public finance, land management and industrial policy. Tanzania and Vietnam both have cohesive party states based on consolidated political power within the party institutions. The distribution of power within the party and society and the relationship between political and economic power were critical determinants of economic transition. While each of these states were able to direct some resources centrally to new economic activities, informal processes outside the central political institutions played a more important role in determining the path of the key transition processes. Both countries largely failed to manage rents that could generate greater productivity growth. Further, the focus on market liberalisation and roll back of the state did not strengthened state capacities in these critical areas. This does not auger well for the longer term path of economic development in Tanzania and Vietnam. 3 Acknowledgements Invaluable assistance from a number of individuals and organisations made this research possible. I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Professor Mushtaq Khan who has been an excellent mentor, generous teacher and friend over the course of researching and writing this thesis. I was very fortunate to be awarded a SOAS Research Student Fellowship Bursary for which I would like to thank SOAS. I would also like to thank the University of London Central Research Fund for a grant to cover research trips to Tanzania in 2005 and Vietnam in 2006. Many people in Tanzania and Vietnam contributed in various ways to the completion of this PhD. I would particularly like to thank Chau Me and Vo Duy Anh for excellent translation assistance and To Van Nhat, Nguyen Dinh Tho and Jonathan Pincus for help in organising a research visit to Vietnam in 2006. I would like to thank my colleagues at the Ministry of Finance in Tanzania from 2000 to 2003. I would like to thank my sister-in-law Nuru Madati for generous hospitality during various research trips to Tanzania. I would like to express my gratitude to Stephanie Blankenburg for comments on the chapters and wise guidance over the years. I am very grateful to my father, Patrick Gray, for corrections to the full draft in the final stages and for sharing his knowledge of economic development in Russia. I would like to thank Chirashree Das Gupta, Tim Kelsall and Jonathan Pincus for taking the time to read and comment on various chapters of the PhD. I would like to thank Lindsay Whitfield for inviting me to participate in a seminar at the Danish Institute for International Studies in May 2011 where I presented some of the findings of the PhD and received useful feedback from the audience. Errors in the PhD are mine alone. Without the support of my parents, Patrick and Winifred Gray, finishing the PhD would have been impossible. My sisters Rosalind Gray and Elizabeth Rumler also gave me unfailing encouragement over the years. My children Adili, born in 2008, and Hugo, born in 2010, have provided joyful distraction from the PhD. I dedicate this PhD to my husband, Amani Kagungila, with heartfelt thanks for the advice, companionship, support and love he has given me at each step along the way. 4 Table of Contents Declaration 2 Abstract 3 Acknowledgements 4 Table Contents 5 List of Tables 8 Map of Tanzania 11 Map of Vietnam 12 Chapter 1: The Problematic 13 1.1 Introduction 13 1.2 Justifications for a Comparison of Tanzania and Vietnam 16 1.2.1 Constructing Socialism 16 1.2.2 Economic Growth Under Liberalisation 20 1.2.3 Political Institutions Under Liberalisation 39 1.3 Main Findings of the PhD 47 Chapter 2: The Analytical Framework 51 2.1 Introduction 51 2.2 New Institutional Economics 51 2.3 Heterodox Theories of the Role of the State 66 2.4 Political Settlements 71 2.4.1 Drivers of Economic Transition 75 2.4.2 The Formative Socialist Political Settlement 80 2.5 Conclusion 85 Chapter 3: The Political Settlement in Tanzania and Vietnam 87 3.1 Introduction 87 3.2 The Political Settlement Under Colonialism 87 5 3.2.1 Tanzania 87 3.2.2 Vietnam 93 3.2.3 Discussion 99 3.3 The Impact of Independence Struggles on the Political Settlement 101 3.3.1 Tanzania 101 3.3.2 Vietnam 104 3.3.3 Discussion 108 3.4 Constructing the Formative Socialist Political Settlement 110 3.4.1 Tanzania 110 3.4.2 Vietnam 115 3.4.3 Discussion 118 3.5 Conclusions 123 Chapter 4: Public Finance 125 4.1 Introduction 125 4.2 Tanzania 128 4.2.1 Public Finance Reforms 130 4.2.2 Impact of Reforms on Aid Flows 133 4.2.3 Ring Fencing of Tax Incentives for FDI 134 4.2.4 Public Finance and the Mining Sector 137 4.2.5 Grand Corruption and Public Finance 142 4.3 Vietnam 149 4.3.1 Outcome of Public Finance Reforms 152 4.3.2 Corruption Associated with On-budget Capital Expenditures 156 4.3.3 Off-budget Funds and the Relationship between SOEs and VCP 159 4.3.4 The Banking Sector 164 4.4 Discussion 168 Chapter 5: Land 178 5.1 Introduction 178 5.2 Vietnam 181 5.2.1 Historical Overview of Land Management 181 6 5.2.2 Land Reform Process Since Doi Moi 183 5.2.3 Corruption and Primitive Accumulation 186 5.2.4 Rural Land Transition 188 5.2.5 Industrial Zones 191 5.3 Tanzania 198 5.3.1 Historical Overview of Land Management 198 5.3.2 The Reform of the Land Laws 201 5.3.3 Title Recognition and Registration 202 5.3.4 Buying and Selling Land 204 5.3.5 Corruption and Primitive Accumulation 206 5.3.6 Land for Mining 208 5.3.7 Land for Agriculture 211 5.3.8 Urban Land, Manufacturing and Tourism 216 5.4 Discussion 219 Chapter 6: Industrial Policy 225 6.1 Introduction 225 6.2 Socialist Industrial Policy 228 6.2.1 Tanzania 228 6.2.2 Vietnam 235 6.2.3 Discussion 238 6.3 Industrial Policy Reforms 240 6.3.1 Industrial Policy Reforms and Privatisation in Tanzania 240 6.3.2 Industrial Policy Reforms and Equitisation in Vietnam 246 6.3.3 Discussion 250 6.4 Industrial Policy under Liberalisation 251 6.4.1 Tanzania 251 6.4.2 Vietnam 259 6.4.3 Discussion 267 Chapter 7: Conclusions 270 Bibliography 292 Annex One: Tables and Data 338 7 List of Tables Table Title Page 1.1 Comparison of National and Sectoral Average Growth 1986 – 24 1995 1.2 Comparison of National and Sectoral Average Growth 1996 – 24 2005 1.3 Percentage Share of Total Employment in Major Sectors in 25 Tanzania and Vietnam 2001, 2006 1.4 Agricultural Output Growth Vietnam - Selected Crops (million 26 tons) 1.5 Vietnamese export composition: 1995 – 2002 (percentages) 27 1.6 Growth across sectors in Tanzania 28 1.7 Production of Selected Manufactured Commodities 1990 – 2003 29 1.8 Contribution of the Mining Sector to the Economy 30 1.9 Value Added Per Worker in Manufacturing in Selected Asian 37 Countries (USD) 1.10 Comparison of the Institutions of the Party under Liberalisation

Load more