“Roadmap to School Bus Parts” Catalog
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SUPREME COURT of NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Orlov V. Halifax Regional Municipality (Halifax Transit), 2018 NSSC 152
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Orlov v. Halifax Regional Municipality (Halifax Transit), 2018 NSSC 152 Date: 20180620 Docket: Hfx No. 386163 Registry: Halifax Between: Stanislav Orlov 2018 NSSC 152 (CanLII) Plaintiff v. The Halifax Regional Municipality, a body corporate duly incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nova Scotia c.o.b. under the name of Metro Transit and Joey Williams Defendants D E C I S I O N Judge: The Honourable Justice Christa M. Brothers Heard: December 13, 14, 18, 19, and 20, 2017, in Halifax, Nova Scotia Decision: June 20, 2018 Counsel: Wayne Bacchus and Igor Yushchenko, for the plaintiff Guy Harfouche and Brandon Knill, Articled Clerk, for the defendants Page 2 Brothers J.: Overview [1] On the afternoon of May 16, 2011, the plaintiff, Mr. Orlov, boarded a Metro Transit Bus instead of walking to work at Mount Saint Vincent University (“MSVU”), where he was employed as a Librarian. It was a rainy, wet day. Metro Transit Bus No. 971 (the “bus”) stopped at 357 Bedford Highway, headed towards Halifax when the plaintiff boarded. The plaintiff was an experienced bus passenger. While holding his wallet, a bag and a transfer, the plaintiff walked 2018 NSSC 152 (CanLII) toward the back of the bus, fell, and broke his ankle (the “accident”). The sole issue for determination is liability. Damages have been agreed to by the parties. [2] What caused the plaintiff to fall? The plaintiff advanced four theories of causation: 1. The speed of the bus leaving the stop was excessive; 2. The floor of the bus was worn and caused the plaintiff to slip; 3. -
Surplus Property Inventory
Pierce Transit Equipment to be Surplused EXHIBIT A 1/7/19 Vehicle # Year Make Model VIN # Lic# LTD Miles 195 2004 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC2LP194U027168 72925C 638,017 200 2004 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC2LP124U027173 A9780C 633,960 201 2004 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC2LP144U027174 72935C 664,068 202 2004 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC2LP164U027175 72938C 645,301 204 2004 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC2LP1X4U027177 72937C 665,863 213 2005 NEW FLYER C40LF CNG 5FYC4FP175C028046 75369C 642,634 2012 2007 CHEVROLET C1500 XC 1GCEC19047E562051 80836C 82,955 2023 2011 FORD F350 1FDRF3G64BEA47793 94718C 156,201 2024 2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 1GB3CZCG2CF228993 A2904C 137,634 2522 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYB 1FMCU49379KB00485 89148C 138,941 2523 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYB 1FMCU49399KB00486 89149C 175,408 2524 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYB 1FMCU49309KB00487 89180C 170,458 2525 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYB 1FMCU49329KB00488 89182C 123,724 2526 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYB 1FMCU49349KB00489 89181C 152,819 2816 2007 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN 1D4GP24E57B251304 80829C 160,398 4590 2001 FORD E350 1FBSS31L81HB58963 85117C 88,493 7001 2005 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN 2D4GP44L55R183742 B1623C 124,553 7009 2005 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN 2D4GP44L45R183750 B1624C 123,872 7216 2007 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 1GAHG35U071194408 C1642C 148,396 7256 2010 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 1GA2GYDG0A1106558 RS08275 127,703 7257 2010 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 1GA2GYDG0A1106737 RS08240 115,158 7259 2010 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 1GA2GYDG1A1106536 RS08274 113,460 7260 2010 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 1GA2GYDG1A1110327 RS08241 122,148 7261 2010 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 3500 -
Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS by MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008
Page 1 of 32 VEHICLE RECALLS BY MANUFACTURER, 2000 Report Prepared 1/16/2008 MANUFACTURER RECALLS VEHICLES ACCUBUIL T, INC 1 8 AM GENERAL CORPORATION 1 980 AMERICAN EAGLE MOTORCYCLE CO 1 14 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO 8 212,212 AMERICAN SUNDIRO MOTORCYCLE 1 2,183 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 4 25,023 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORP. 5 1,441 APRILIA USA INC. 2 409 ASTON MARTIN 2 666 ATHEY PRODUCTS CORP. 3 304 B. FOSTER & COMPANY, INC. 1 422 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE 11 28,738 BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY 12 62,692 BUELL MOTORCYCLE CO 4 12,230 CABOT COACH BUILDERS, INC. 1 818 CARPENTER INDUSTRIES, INC. 2 6,838 CLASSIC LIMOUSINE 1 492 CLASSIC MANUFACTURING, INC. 1 8 COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC. 8 5,271 COACHMEN RV COMPANY 1 576 COLLINS BUS CORPORATION 1 286 COUNTRY COACH INC 6 519 CRANE CARRIER COMPANY 1 138 DABRYAN COACH BUILDERS 1 723 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION 30 6,700,752 DAMON CORPORATION 3 824 DAVINCI COACHWORKS, INC 1 144 D'ELEGANT CONVERSIONS, INC. 1 34 DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. 1 210 DUTCHMEN MANUFACTURING, INC 1 105 ELDORADO NATIONAL 1 173 ELECTRIC TRANSIT, INC. 1 54 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 1 40 E-ONE, INC. 1 3 EUROPA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 242 EXECUTIVE COACH BUILDERS 1 702 FEATHERLITE LUXURY COACHES 1 83 FEATHERLITE, INC. 2 3,235 FEDERAL COACH, LLC 1 230 FERRARI NORTH AMERICA 8 1,601 FLEETWOOD ENT., INC. 5 12, 119 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 60 7,485,466 FOREST RIVER, INC. 1 115 FORETRAVEL, INC. 3 478 FOURWINNS 2 2,276 FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION 27 233,032 FREIGHTLINER LLC 1 803 GENERAL MOTORS CORP. -
Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers*
Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers* Revised 04/21/2020 On-Road (Medium/Heavy Duty, Terminal Tractors) OEM Model Technology Vocations GVWR Type Altec Industries, Inc Altec 12E8 JEMS ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 1820 and 18E20 ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 4E4 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 6E6 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport ISX12N Engine Near-Zero Engine Truck > 33,001 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport L9N Engine Near-Zero Engine Refuse > 33,001 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered All American School Bus Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered Vision School Bus 4x2 Configuration Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New BYD Motors BYD 8Y Electric Yard Tractor Zero Emission Terminal Truck 81,000 New BYD Motors BYD C10 45' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 49,604 New BYD Motors BYD C10MS 45' All-Electric Double-Decker Coach Bus Zero Emission Transit Bus 45' New BYD Motors BYD C6 23' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 18,331 New BYD Motors BYD K11 60' Articulated All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus 65,036 New BYD Motors BYD K7M 30' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus, Transit Bus 30' New BYD Motors BYD K9 40' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission -
1983 Ketron Inc
DOT-TSC-U MT A -83-2 Wheelchair Lifts on U.S.Department of Transportation Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Prepared by: January 1983 Ketron Inc. H: 3 1 ~ 190 i EQUIPM ENT ENGlNEERING DEPARTMENT NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans portation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to th e object of this report. DOT-TSC-U tv'IT A-83-2 S.C.R. T.D. LIBRARY Wheelchair Lifts on U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transit Buses Transportation Administration Summary of U. S. Experience Prepared by: Ketron Inc. One Broadway Cambridge MA 02142 Office of Technical Assistance Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Washington DC 20590 0-7548 ~ .. PREFACE This project was conducted for the USDOT Transportati on Systems Center (TSC) and the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) by KETRON, Inc . - Cambridge Facility. The contract \vas initiated in September, 1980 betv1een TSC and Applied Resour ce Integration, Ltd. (ARI) of Boston - Contract r~o . DTRS57-80-C-00150 . In 1981 KETRON acquired ARI and t he project was continued and completed by the same project teom . The successful completion of t he project is attr ibutabl e to the cooperation of a large number of organizations and personnel representing t r ansit properties, bus manuf ac t ur Prs, lift su pp liers , and others concerned v1ith the problem of acccssi bil ity on public transit systems. -
Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated As of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC a C AMF a M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd
Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC A C AMF A M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd. by Skyline Motorized Div.) ACAD Acadian ACUR Acura ADET Adette AMIN ADVANCE MIXER ADVS ADVANCED VEHICLE SYSTEMS ADVE ADVENTURE WHEELS MOTOR HOME AERA Aerocar AETA Aeta DAFD AF ARIE Airel AIRO AIR-O MOTOR HOME AIRS AIRSTREAM, INC AJS AJS AJW AJW ALAS ALASKAN CAMPER ALEX Alexander-Reynolds Corp. ALFL ALFA LEISURE, INC ALFA Alfa Romero ALSE ALL SEASONS MOTOR HOME ALLS All State ALLA Allard ALLE ALLEGRO MOTOR HOME ALCI Allen Coachworks, Inc. ALNZ ALLIANZ SWEEPERS ALED Allied ALLL Allied Leisure, Inc. ALTK ALLIED TANK ALLF Allison's Fiberglass mfg., Inc. ALMA Alma ALOH ALOHA-TRAILER CO ALOU Alouette ALPH Alpha ALPI Alpine ALSP Alsport/ Steen ALTA Alta ALVI Alvis AMGN AM GENERAL CORP AMGN AM General Corp. AMBA Ambassador AMEN Amen AMCC AMERICAN CLIPPER CORP AMCR AMERICAN CRUISER MOTOR HOME Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 AEAG American Eagle AMEL AMERICAN ECONOMOBILE HILIF AMEV AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLE LAFR AMERICAN LA FRANCE AMI American Microcar, Inc. AMER American Motors AMER AMERICAN MOTORS GENERAL BUS AMER AMERICAN MOTORS JEEP AMPT AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION AMRR AMERITRANS BY TMC GROUP, INC AMME Ammex AMPH Amphicar AMPT Amphicat AMTC AMTRAN CORP FANF ANC MOTOR HOME TRUCK ANGL Angel API API APOL APOLLO HOMES APRI APRILIA NEWM AR CORP. ARCA Arctic Cat ARGO Argonaut State Limousine ARGS ARGOSY TRAVEL TRAILER AGYL Argyle ARIT Arista ARIS ARISTOCRAT MOTOR HOME ARMR ARMOR MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC ARMS Armstrong Siddeley ARNO Arnolt-Bristol ARRO ARROW ARTI Artie ASA ASA ARSC Ascort ASHL Ashley ASPS Aspes ASVE Assembled Vehicle ASTO Aston Martin ASUN Asuna CAT CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO ATK ATK America, Inc. -
INVESTOR PRESENTATION August 2019
INVESTOR PRESENTATION August 2019 NFI:TSX Who is NFI? Bus Design & Manufacture Part Fabrication Parts and Service North America’s largest bus and North America’s largest heavy-duty Captive fiberglass reinforced plastic motor coach parts distributor public transit bus manufacturer fabricator for MCI, New Flyer and ADL and the leader in Zero-Emission Bus (ZEB) transit Captive parts fabricator for New Flyer, UK’s leading bus parts distributor North American market leader in ARBOC and NFI Parts. Plans to and aftermarket service support motor coaches for both Public and KMG fabricate for MCI and ADL beyond network Private operators 2020 U.K.’s largest bus and motor coach Supports eMobility projects from manufacturer with leading share in start to finish Hong Kong and New Zealand and a growing global presence. North America’s first innovation North America’s disruptive low-floor lab dedicated to the exploration cutaway and medium-duty transit and advancement of bus and bus leader coach technology 2 Why Invest In NFI? Track Record Our Differentiators • Trusted business partner with over 300 years of combined bus • Market leading positions in US, Canada, UK, Hong Kong and and motor coach design and manufacturing experience New Zealand with strong portfolios in Singapore, Malaysia and Mexico • 5 year Q2 2019 LTM Revenue CAGR of 13.1% and Adj. EBITDA CAGR of 21.5% • Growing presence in Switzerland and Germany (gateway into continental Europe) • Peer Leading(1) 11.6% Q2 2019 LTM Adj. EBITDA margin • ~80% of revenue driven by public (i.e. government -
Download the Roadeo Program
August 2 - 5, 2019 BUILDING AMERICA’S ZERO EMISSIONS FUTURE Now Available! GILLIG’s new Battery Electric offering, powered by Cummins’ electrified powertrain. Partners you can trust. www.GILLIG.com Jerry Sheehan 510-329-0320 | [email protected] Summer Meeting & Roadeo Sponsor Sunday Bocce & Dinner Sponsor Passenger Assistance & Wheelchair Securement Sponsor Sunday Roadeo Awards Lunch Sponsor Roadeo & Summer Meeting Lanyard Sponsor Monday Membership Breakfast Sponsor Showcase Sponsors Roadeo Water & Snack Sponsors Key Locations Shuttles to Roadeo events on Saturday and Sunday will stop at both the Residence Inn (wait near the hotel’s rear entrance on Third Street) and Towneplace Suites (wait near the hotel’s main entrance on Church Street). Departure times are noted throughout the schedule. Residence Inn Williamsport 150 W Church Street, Williamsport, PA 17701 One of two host hotels for PPTA’s 2019 Roadeo & Summer Meeting. The rear entrance on Third Street is located directly across the street from the Michael Ross Event Center. Towneplace Suites Williamsport 10 W Church Street, Williamsport, PA 17701 The second of two host hotels for PPTA’s 2019 Roadeo & Summer Meeting. Located about two blocks from the Residence Inn & Michael Ross Event Center Michael Ross Event Center 3rd Floor, 144 W Third Street, Williamsport, PA 17701 The hub of all Roadeo & Summer Meeting Events. Registration, drivers’ and judges’ meetings, and Monday morning programs will be held here. Transit Drive 100 W Third Street, Williamsport, PA 17701 Location of Saturday events for drivers competing in the Roadeo. Located next door to the Michael Ross Event Center, Transit Drive sits behind RVT’s Trade & Transit Centre I. -
Town of Glastonbury Invitation to Bid Bid # Item
TOWN OF GLASTONBURY INVITATION TO BID BID # ITEM DATE & TIME REQUIRED GL-2019-32 Maintenance and Repair of February 26, 2019 @ 11:00 AM Fleet Vehicles & School Buses The Town of Glastonbury will receive Sealed Bids, in duplicate, for service and repair of the Town’s fleet vehicles and the Glastonbury Board of Education school buses. Bids will be received only at the Office of the Purchasing Agent, Town Hall (second level), 2155 Main Street, Glastonbury, CT 06033, Attention: Mary F. Visone, Purchasing Agent, no later than the time and date indicated above (local time), at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud. No late bids will be accepted. Bid Forms may be obtained from the Town’s website at www.glastonbury-ct.gov . The Town reserves the right to waive informalities or reject any part of or the entire bid when said action is deemed to be in the best interest of the Town. The Town of Glastonbury is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Minority / Women / Disadvantaged Business Enterprises are encouraged to bid. Mary F. Visone Purchasing Agent MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEET VEHICLES & SCHOOL BUSES GL-2019-32 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Invitation to Bid Table of Contents TC 1 Information for Bidders IB 1 - 3 Detailed Specifications DS 1 - 4 Bid Proposal BP 1 - 3 Attachment A (List of School Buses) Attachment B (Preventative Maintenance Schedule) TC-1 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEET VEHICLES & SCHOOL BUSES GL-2019-32 INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS 1. Sealed bids (one original and one copy) on the attached Bid Forms will be received at the Office of the Purchasing Agent, Town Hall, 2155 Main Street, Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 (second level). -
Top 10 School Bus Companies Blog
TOP 10 SCHOOL BUS COMPANIES Throughout the years, the task of making the best buses for school transportation has been handled by various companies. This article features 10 school bus companies which made a name for themselves, when it came to redefining the way we look at a school bus. #1 WAYNE CORPORATION Topping our list of companies is Wayne Corporation. Though the company declared itself bankrupt and discontinued operation in 1992, the Wayne Corporation had played a vital role in the development of safe buses for school children. They were the first and foremost to introduce the concept of school buses for schools. Their innovation predates the famous yellow coloured buses which are widely used these days. www.trackschoolbus.com They introduced the horse drawn carts, including kid hacks, which later evolved into automobiles which used full metal body chassis. Wayne Corporation introduced guard rails on the sides of all school buses, inboard wheelchair lifts, and even high-headroom doors. They were the first with a school bus based upon a cutaway van chassis, the Wayne Busette. This chassis design is still one of the most popular in North American markets even after more than 35 years. #2 BLUE BIRD An all time giant, the Blue Bird Corporation (formerly called Blue Bird Body Company) is clearly one of the top school bus manufacturing companies even today. Blue Bird's corporate headquarters and main manufacturing facilities are in Georgia. www.trackschoolbus.com It was in 1937 that the company began production of full-steel bus bodies. This innovation would soon replace the wooden bodies which were commonly used in the United States. -
SBMTC Procedure for Testing and Rating Automotive Bus Hot Water
PROCEDURE FOR TESTING AND RATING AUTOMOTIVE BUS HOT WATER AND HEATING AND VENTILATING EQUIPMENT National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services July 1996 Prepared by School Bus Manufacturers Technical Committee National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services 1 School Bus Manufacturers Technical Committee Members AmTran Corporation Blue Bird Corporation Carpenter Manufacturing, Inc. Ford Motor Company Freightliner Corporation Mid Bus, Inc. Navistar International Thomas Built Buses, Inc. 2 SBMTC - 001 Procedure for Testing and Rating Automotive Bus Hot Water Heating and Ventilating Equipment July 1996 © 1996 National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby given to copy and distribute this document without charge provided that each copy bears the copyright notice accompanied by the following: “Reprinted with express permission of the National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services.” Additional copies of this publication are available upon request from: National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services 116 Howe Drive Dover, DE 19901 1-800-585-0340 3 SCHOOL BUS MANUFACTURERS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE PROCEDURE FOR TESTING AND RATING AUTOMOTIVE BUS HOT WATER HEATING AND VENTILATING EQUIPMENT 1. SCOPE-- This recommended practice, limited to liquid coolant systems, establishes uniform automotive bus heater test procedures. Required test equipment, facilities and definitions are included. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 HEATER SYSTEM-- The system shall comprise an integral assembly having a core assembly, or assemblies, air moving device or devices and the integrally attached shell/housing which contains or attaches to these components. This Unit heater shall extend to the point of interface between the unit under test and its point of attachment to the vehicle, excluding all external ducts and ducting. -
Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality
Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same.